Planned Parenthood v. Casey Summary | quimbee.com
Вставка
- Опубліковано 2 жов 2017
- A video case brief of Planned Parenthood v. Casey, 505 U.S. 833 (1992). For the full-text brief, visit www.quimbee.com/cases/planned...
Planned Parenthood (plaintiff) brought suit against Casey (defendant), the Governor of Pennsylvania, in federal district court for the purpose of challenging five restrictions on abortion under Pennsylvania law. Most significantly, the Pennsylvania statute required informed consent and a 24-hour waiting period for all women prior to undergoing the procedure. All minors seeking an abortion were required to obtain the informed consent of at least one parent, while a married woman had to show that she notified her husband of her intent to abort the fetus. The district court issued judgment for Planned Parenthood, but the court of appeals upheld all Pennsylvania provisions except the requirement of spousal notification. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.
Looking forward to the analysis of the recent opinion.
ty for explaining! this really helps out!
Great video and super clear! Thank you!
this is the FNAF sister location man and you cannot tell me otherwise
Perhaps this video should be updated...
I don't know. What do you think?
O’Connor, Stevens, Souter, Kennedy, Thomas, Scalia, White, Rehnquist, and Blackmun all on the court at the same time. Wow.
An undue burden on women's right to choose? What? No! Men do not have the authority to tell women what they can and can not do with their own bodies!
Viable fetus?? What's an unviable fetus?
A viable fetus can live outside the womb
@@aeonbollig666 On it's own, no machines attached, yes?
A baby about to be born
@@jameservin1333 why reply to this 3 years later with blatantly false information?
ROE V WADE HAS BEEN OVERTURNED
How about birth control
People do use it, what happens when it fails?
how about you get a vasectomy
Of course the right side is old men with views from before abortion was legalized.
Only law calls a child an "undo burden". Rape, incest, an unviable fetus*, or if the life of the mother is at stake are the only reasons to abort a pregnancy.
I've spoken with rape victims that had to abort. They're doomed either way. They abort the baby and feel guilty for the rest of their lives, or they keep the baby to raise and have to look at the eyes of the rapist for the rest of their lives or give it up for adoption AFTER having to carry the child to term. The physical, psychological and spiritual ramifications are more than what's on the surface. I can't imagine the pain that any of this costs.
*fetus is used as a medical term
The law should be her body her choice but should also be his wallet his choice
if the man wants a child, he can adopt or get a surrogate mother. His wife's body isnt the only body that can bear a child. It's also her physical and mental health that are challenged.
I think both partners should decide first if they want a baby. And if it happens accidentally, then the mother is the one to decide. Her body her choice.
Why would notifying the father be unconstitutional? It's just as much of his as of her.
Why shouldn't they have to notify their spouses, it's probably their child too.
Because what if the spouse is abusive? And worst case scenario we can have a dead woman and a dead baby too
People cheat, what a way to find out.
@@guiorey3355 If the spouse is abusive you just get a divorce. That's not a basis to hide information in an intimate relationship.
@@guiorey3355 Well you can't just hold back a fathers right to know just cause you think all men are abusive. And are out to kill an woman and their baby. Plus not all men are abusive and should have a say in the matter.
Roe has been aborted by Dobbs!
The 10 dislikes are from boomers
What dislikes ? UA-cam has blocked it
@@chandlerraines9972 that comment was from 2 years ago when you could still see the dislikes.
Blackmun should have recused himself from this case since, if memory serves, his daughter was a leader of Planned Parenthood in Orlando.
Orlando isn’t on Pennsylvania
This world is going to hell unless people turn from their wicked ways and repent.
you may be right. but the constitution says nothing about the world going to hell, and therefore, legally, it should do nothing to stop the descent.
@@subi_legacy the Bible says you must repent and turn from your wicked ways. If people don't repent that's where people go. I live by what the Bible says. Of course the constitution isn't going to say that. The bible is the only way to live if you want to be with Jesus.
who wrote the Bible? who wrote the constitution? who wrote the laws?
As a legal matter, I believe people in the U.S. have the right to NOT have an abortion. Therefore, under the equal protection clause of the 14th amendment, people in the U.S. have the right to have an abortion.
As a legal matter, I believe people in the U.S. have the right to NOT have incest. Therefore, under the equal protection clause of the 14th amendment, people in the U.S have the right to incest.
The scotus has never ruled on abortion as an equal protection issue. But your logic is very fuzzy. That would mean the Equal Protection Clause covers everything including gun ownership.
Back then they didn't know that abortion would be done right up to the point of birth and after the child is born and in the US since 1973 there has been 61,900.589.5 abortions
You can't have an abortion after birth. That's crazy talk. You would be talking about infanticide, which isn't a thing.
If infanticide isn't a thing, there wouldn't be a word for it.
@@benjamintryon813 Have you ever seen abortion video ? may be you should
@@dorisdady8758 why would I watch that? I know that it occurs.
@@benjamintryon813 No you don't and it now 62,459,868 abortins that been done since 1973 may be you should learn how they kill them. Here for you The Reality of 2nd Trimester Surgical Abortions - Dr Norman MacLean NZOM
The system can't tell you that you can and can't do with your body tell them that they don't and I mean don't have authority over man and woman the states have no say over me and you tell them there not god and there not your creator of life and mind there bisunness
David Parsons and learn there language so there can fight the way there wants to so there aren’t looked at as there idiot there are becoz there has no there grasp of their native language and there is stupid so there.
@Elliott Smith Abortion is not a constitutional right as it is not stated anywhere in the Constitution.
your grammar is awful
@@kentaromiurafanaccount5727 You know what else wasn't in the original constitution? Innocent until proven guilty, a jury of your peers, no taxation without representation, right to privacy to name few. The constitution is not the bible, and its words are made from humans, just doing trial and error. It's not perfect, and just because it isn't stated in the constitution doesn't mean you don't have a right to it. That's like saying that if the constitution didn't mention your right to free speech, then suddenly it isn't that which should be a fundamental ability for all human beings.
@Nicole Jessica you're probably just another "protect UNBORN babies but let the old folks die of coronavirus!" Smh when you get an abortion they're sucking out something without a BRAIN OR A HEART YET. But ya don't protect actual living breathing human beings because they're old anyway right?. Smh the republican agenda is a sick one. You all sound so uneducated thinking the fetus is actually living and breathing when they abort it.
When it's His fetus TOO;
why was/is the husband denied A Right to know about her about taking place‽?‽
I'm NOT on The Far Right but DAMN!
because the male partner does very little work. his body is not involved in the baby's developmental process whatsoever. the only entity that should be making a definitive choice on whether or not to keep the baby growing inside is the one who is being directly physically affected by the pregnancy.
@@grace-gr3vr The husband was the one who gave his wife’s egg his own sperm though, so he has 50% contribution to the pregnancy happening.
@@jakewilliams2308 okay?
@@grace-gr3vr Well sure you can argue woman takes up the burden of the child development before birth. But have you thought about the responsibility the man will have when the kids BORN? raising, feeding and providing for the little man/woman? why is the husband being notified and having a say in the matter be unconstitutional? It is just as much of him as of her. So why is the husband being notified about his kid unconstitutional? And the part of the argument I see no pro-choicers talk about is. A woman has the right to abortion alright, but does a man have the right to an abortion? A woman can easily say "I want an abortion" and get an abortion go through the whole process and wipe her hands clear of all responsibilities of rising a kid. But what if the woman is baby crazy can a man do the same and say "I'm not ready to raise a kid yet" and wipe his hands clean? That's the part I don't hear anyone talk about.
This issue really needs to be revisited. The current framework allows for too much bad interpretation, and thus, killing of unborn babies.
If its unborn it's not a baby, it's a fetus and it has no rights that trumps that of a BORN LIVING citizen. Can't kill something that isn't a baby
Why is it allowed to kill innocent baby’s? At least bring the kid to the shelter but don’t kill it 🤯
Most people who say that don't think about the child well being and Mental health. People who say that (in my opinion) are just ignorant. Most children who end up in ophan homes, doesn't even get taken care of well. And most likely when they turn 18 will be kicked out and jobless. If you actually care, go to an orphan center or whatever and help the kids who are in need out and stop worrying about Women's bodies/ unborn fetuses.
Honestly, USA who doesn't care for their homeless and the poor and has even given tax money to the top 10%, have NO RIGHT to ban abortion. They only care about the fetus when it's in the mother's belly but after that, it's on their own! Government's right to someone's body already is a ridiculous thing, but it's even more ridiculous when you ban abortion and don't even offer GOOD safety net and free healthcare for the born child and the family, INSTEAD they give a hefty bill in the hospital for having a baby and now they're in debt. The poverty in that country is something they should be focusing on instead of if a woman has a right to their own body.
It's not killing because it's a fetus, not a baby. It's not a human. You guys never think through before saying dumb shit like this. As if carrying a child for 9 months is easy, especially if you DONT want it. Moreover shelters are overfilled and majority of kids there get abused
@@iiFallenWish so in your logic it’s better to kill the baby so it doesn’t grow up in bad conditions? A baby has a heartbeat within 3-5 weeks in the womb. It’s a human but for satanists it’s just flesh to sacrifice we already understood it but thanks for the explanation.
Could there be a middle ground where abortion is only allowed if a child is conceived by rape?
Talk to somebody who was conceived out of rape and I guarantee you will change your mind!
No Wayan,
If what's in the womb is a human life (as science confirms) there are no justifications for taking that innocent life.
We don't execute a child for the sins of his or her father.
@@user-ct4cl2fj7n Right!
That doesn't mean the baby has any less of a right to live. Either we think it's a baby and all abortions are wrong, or we think it's not a baby and and abortions are not wrong.
Why don’t we ever talk about killing the rapist? That’s justice
Psalm 106:38 And shed innocent blood, even blood of their sons and of their daughters,/; and polluted the land with blood. Proverbs 6:16, 17... These six things doeth the Lord hate: yea, seven are an abomination unto him: A proud look, a lying tongue, and hands that shed innocent blood
Religion shouldn't really be in laws in my opinion. Not everyone is religious or have the same religion as you. "My body, My choice"
I don't care about your religious, my body, my choice
@@happyvibeo_kido4732 Vaccinations?
@@happyvibeo_kido4732 finally someone said it 🤦🏼♀️
I'm sorry but I disagree with it all. It's a man's right to be a parent right? So shouldn't that be equal? If so why does a woman get to kill a man's kid? Completely unconstitutional.
@Adam Hillier That's not what the provision stated.
The provision stated that the husband must be "notified", not that he has to sign off on an abortion. The "it's her body argument" is mostly a strawman in that regards. I mean, I'm pro-choice, but I do think that if you're married, and supposedly one, you should tell your husband that you're having an abortion...especially if you want him to take care of your child when you do have one. You're either in this thing called a marriage together or you're not.
@@jeviosoorishas181 The my body, my choice argument went out with COVID per liberals. They are looking for a new slogan with bumper sticker depth.
Because it’s not a kid yet. Abortions happen pre-viability, meaning before it’s formed enough to even potentially breathe air on its own.
My issue is what if it’s not the husbands child? What if the couple is separated? What if this decision was made with the biological father (who is not the woman’s husband). There are so many ‘what if’s’.
It would seem silly to require a man to get his wife’s acknowledgment or as a prerequisite to do anything health related.
@@m3driver245 So do you imply that life begins at viability with that comment?