Archeologists have found homo sapiens remains in France which are almost 300.000 yo, that means that the modern human have been around for at least that long. Our civilization is only 8000 yo. What humans did 290.000 years? It is totally reasonable to imagine that multiple civilizations have risen and fall before us.
I'm not sure where you found that homo sapiens have existed in Europe 300,000 years ago, could you point to a source? I found only that a population of homo sapiens may have been around southern France for only a roughly 40 year period around 80,000 years ago. These remains of homo sapiens found in Europe only prove that they had *once* existed there, not that they had *continuously* existed there. Homo sapiens as a species, if I'm not mistaken, are only 300k yo themselves. I'm sure plenty that is lost to history has happened over the full breadth of human existence, but much of that existence was that of a hunter-gatherer. I'm not asserting this was your implication, but they certainly didn't waste 290,000 years of history; they had their own cultures and histories, and left us some wonderful remnants of both! Could there be crazier stuff we haven't scratched the surface of? Sure! But what was left behind as we understand it is itself incredible.
Where do you think we got the tech from and if they had all that knowledge back then, why didn't have it a century ago and why did we 'forget' so much knowledge? These are things people don't question. If it was ancient people, what happened to the tech? It was taken from us, forgotten by later generations, and now they hide the truth from us. Yes, true evil does exist in human form. They want to keep us dumbed down and in the dark about everything they know. Don't believe in non-terrestrial beings...see only what THEY want you to see. That's just what they want. We aren't alone, never will be, and will never be. There's too much evidence to the contrary that says there are non-terrestrials and they have visited this world and taught many cultures about many things. Start the research. It WILL change your mind.
What is wrong with aliens it doesn't necessarily mean Little Green Men we have a massive solar system you honestly believe that we are the only intelligent beings there is no way we could have done it you just have to accept that😊
I am a super huge "Ancient High Technology" person and this video is nothing short of a revelation. AHT doesn't mean "aliens" it means "We dont' know, yet." There is SO much stuff here that stretches and challenges my mind. This is nuts. Dammit. They did this, and yet this is still only scratching the surface
@spacedaddy5517 I spent 9 months living in Egypt studying the ancient sites and I didn't see ANY evidence of what you show here, over there, is what I mean, sorry
Im a dude with decades of history in c theories like aliens, ancient advanced technonolgy, but over time im finally getting the wisdom in this space , thevtruthbisbprobably somewhere in the middle , not in flat earthers side not in "experts" side, both are wrong , the common sense side is some where in the middle. Common sense says if egyptian had precision cutting technology and high technology in general, they would have depicted the "technology" on stones , advanced tools , advanced boats , even more advanced writting letters ,nowhere they are found but having melting skills or geopolymer skills existing along those primitive tools theyve depicted on stones makes more sense , bcuz fire existed, the sun existed to use to melt stones with solar lens, the ability to mix certain soils to make geopolymer existed , and such a civilization would have had primitive boats for example without any machinery inside and it doesnt contradict the melting and geopolymer theories. But ancient advanced tech is against common sense , bcuz common sense says as time passes we get more advanced bcuz we discover new perspective on world , thus for the past world we need the simplest explainations instead of complicating theories like advanced past that make us totally unable to speculate at all, its like we make a new invisible realm that we dont access and no matter how much we try we would stay in darkness bcuz those times are gone and we dont have time travel machine to discover their unique alien like techs and life
I absolutely applaud the depth you have gone into researching these hanan pacha sites and the knowledge you have shared is incredible. For every 10 videos on these ancient sites there's 1 that puts forth truly useful and insightful information. We only build on the shoulders of giants and you are a giant whose work has brought us closer to a clear image of what capabilities these cultures were able to create. I have never heard anyone state the chupa towers could equate to industrial furnaces and from your analysis seems so obvious. Just outstanding communication of the Inca history and compelling arguments overall. 👏 👏👏👏👏👏 after seeing this, I believe the mushroom courtyard could have been a workshop for creating curved metalworks on large scale and for a variety of curvatures eg. Shields, headware, ornaments. I'm honestly blown away. Another piece of the puzzle strongly set in place. 🙏
Thank you tairynngatai7095, your comment was incredibly thoughtful. This video was a collection from most of the knowledge that I've learned while traveling to these ancient places over the years. I've toured with local guides and have talked to their elders about the stories & legends they hold about these places. I've also toured with people from the History & Discovery Channel. I have also read the book The Travels of Pedro de Cieza de León who was a conquistador who traveled to Peru 500 years ago and documented any knowledge of these places & the Inca civilization as well. From all of this, these stones tell a much bigger story. I believe our ancient ancestors were much smarter than what we perceive they are today. They have also created monuments and structures that either are in ruins, are still buried, or have been destroyed throughout time.
@@TheVoyagerTV I can't state how critical it is for people with such a strongly invested interest such as yourself to put forth this significant information so the true history of these sites are brought to light, as there is still such a small community around the world that see the importance of these sites and the knowledge they hold. You are helping change the perception of the ancient past and the inconsistencies that we have been taught in so many conventional formats. I hope to visit some of these sites and build on this knowledge as well and thank you for the book reference I will find a copy so I can be further enlightened on this subject.
The oxalate observation I've made myself a few years ago. While reducing birch sap to make beer I noticed that when I skimmed the top with a spoon the material I banged out on a rock had a caustic reaction with the stone. Chaga, which grows only on birch trees, has the highest oxalate count of any other living organism. It was very satisfying to me to hear of this observation from others.
very earthy, lol. I reduced about 100 gallons of sap down to 5 gallons of syrup and added yeast. Birch sap has a rather violent fermentation.@@jthepickle7
@@dukeofthedance8062he's got Ole Willie over I think. He's past 90 years old and looks every day lol. He made it a few years ago so it was good beer.
If they did have the ability to make stone like cement, then they probably would have used a mold to pour the mixture into. In this case all the stones would be the same size.
There was no need for uniformity. I'm sure many of their buildings were uniformly built but not of them still stand except from the BASE of the non-uniform megalithic ones. Which obviously means they did this on purpose, in order to last. It's also much easier and faster to just place random sized pieces on top of eachother. The previous pieces have already hardened and the next ones will simply sit on top of them and take their shape. Easy. No need for alignment or proper fitment.
The exterior side we see could have been make of cloth or tightly woven matt used in the molds. That would account for the bulged out appearance. The flat joins part of the mold could have been made of wood or stone.
Stone (Granite, Diorite, Feldspar etc.) cannot be 'melted' unless kept in a temperature controlled vacuum, why? When certain types of rocks or minerals are heated to a high temperature and then rapidly cooled, they can turn into a non-crystalline, amorphous solid known as glass. This process is called vitrification. The rapid cooling prevents the atoms in the material from arranging themselves into a crystalline structure, resulting in the formation of a non-crystalline, transparent or translucent material. This is how volcanic obsidian, for example, is formed when molten rock cools rapidly. Also because the other component minerals in the stone react with available Oxygen in the air causing Oxidation. Try making an autoclave, a Vacuum Chamber, big enough to hold a 100 ton block of granite, it would be absolutely HUGE!!
I believe at 00:38:45 and further into the video, it's mentioned that the Sillustani towers in Peru may have been primitive autoclaves for this process.
I also noticed this. There is a guy on youtube who was melting obsidian and trying to cast primative weapons. He blew out his kiln and several crucibles trying to do it. He wanted to see if ancient people might have made sand cast weapons with melted obsidian. They key is to have it cool really quickly. That is how obsidian forms from volcanos. It cools quickly and becomes like you said glasslike and Vitrified. I did fire a simple rock in my kiln from some decorative gravel for landscaping. I fired it in a ceramic box and this stone was just like obsidian after, when I opened the box. However it fused to the inside of the box. Like a glaze would do. It went into the kiln, rough, geometric, and grayish blue. It came out rounded and like black glass. Was shocking tbh. I have fired other lava rock and such, in the same temperature range but it didn't change at all.
That could be the magic though, building something big enough to do it on 100 ton blocks. Whatever they had it was more advanced than anything we have now.
I think the better question is why do we find the same building megalithic methods all around the world? Peru, Italy, Egypt, Spain, Bolivia, Easter Island. I thought there was no contact between them?
I don't know, maybe because they're the same species. I mean hell, why do people develop languages or build huts even though there's no contact between them. It's called natural instinct, explained by evolutionary psychology.
Because we came here on ships built as cities. YES WE as humans. Like our modern day cruise ships but bigger. The schools instilled the same building techniques because of the technology they brought and understood. It is obvious that if you were going to other planets, you would use technology to build protection and shelter with an abundant resource on all planets. STONE.
I always thought that the stones looked like cement. If they pulverized the stone, then it could be carried to the place they wanted and pored into forms. This would eliminate the need to move multi ton blocks of stone.
Perhaps both large stones and pulverized stone were transported to the site. The large stones were shaped and chiseled into their basic shape, and then a geopolymer outside finish was placed onto the stone. This could explain why all H-shaped blocks are very similar, but the dimensions are all different as if they were handmade and not by a cast.
@@somewhereinhawaii3663 Yeah. Sure. You nailed it. Look at the shapes. Those shapes are obtained because of existing stone shapes. You peck away at the surface on both stones to create seamless interfacing of the stone. It is impossible to crush stone, put it on a mold and come out with solid stone afterwards. Presume you’re correct though. How do you create exact molds to fit existing stone surfaces? Think it through.
And they were made using the metric system. Using a laser they are 1 meter and a tiny fraction of a millimeter tall. The horizontal gap between the vertical H lines was 22 cm and a tiny fraction of a millimeter. Those millimeter fractions are attributed to weathering. Weird... If you are interested the Funny Olde World channel has a great documentary where they measure them along with other ancient sites all over the world. It is called Builders of Ancient Technology.
The ancient writings tell us, the ancient people used a plane based paste form of hydro-floric acid as a mortar, that softened the surface to a stone to the softness of paste, and when the hydrogen evaporated, it left the stones as hard as they were before the procedure. With joints are so perfect that nothing can go between the stones. The knobs were electric discharge nodes to draw off the natural electric charge of the earth from places people frequent.
they did not use it as mortar, nor was it some acid. looking at various sites, its clear that various techniques were deployed which all made use of chemical softening in sometimes, particularly in egypt, it was combined with mechanical cutting. there are site in south america that look like they liquified rock faces that were left in the ground and just reshaped into a useful form, such as stairs. for the polygonal walls, there are stone left over that are bent, which clearly tell us that they soaked the entire rock in a liquid that made it soft, and it was previously cut into a roughly fitting shape, and then after it was soft, it was placed on top of others, where it settled into its place, filling the corners perfectly under its own weight and pressure. too smooth it, they applied the liquid afterwards, and then scraped the rock flat. you can see this on the casing stones of the pyramids that have unfinished ones left, and also on rock in some wall in the Osirion, where you can clearly see rough stone and smooth stone above on the same stone, like someone went over it with something that flattened it like a paste while the rocks where already in place.
@@sshreddderr9409what is the name of that Site in South America with the faces seemingly softened & molded/reformed into stairs? Sounds really interesting and surprising to witness
the ancients might have not used electricity to cut stone but instead used Energy, frequency and vibration in away to not just make stone easier to cut but also to move, vibration makes sound and sound makes energy which in turn makes vibration frequency can be turned into magnetism electricity or heat
Great job with your videos bro! Love that edit in the beginning where you are standing in the window lol. Where is the opening scene shot, Sacsayhuaman? The GLOBAL polygonal stone builders are easily one of the most fascinating mysteries of all time. I totally agree with you about your perspective on precision, Ben over at UnchartedX also focuses on the precision aspect because it is truly remarkable. Once you've worked with stone yourself, you see structures like these and finally understand the actual gravity and astonishing awe of what they accomplished. Thanks for making these and getting more great shots of these important historical sites! Rock on dude ~
Thank you so much for your comment and the opinion on my work, it means a lot to hear. Yes the introduction is from Sacsayhuaman in Cusco, Peru. I know it seems like I could've just filmed and created that scene but that one section was currently blocked off. Yes I completely agree that the global polygonal stone builders are incredibly fascinating. You can find all different types of polygonal stone walls and the quality of the construction method ranges. Ben at UnchartedX has done an incredible amount of research and I find his videos to be very compelling by challenging the type of technology used during the ancient past. I would love to see his research done on other ancient artifacts from around the world as his work is unique to this field of research. As always, thank you for the view and it's a passion of mine to show everyone and to talk about these ancient achievements during antiquity. 🗿🤘!
You're doing a great job bro. Because you're going against the grain, lots of haters will come at you. Like those guys picking on your use of the digital microscope in a previous video's comments. I think that kind of thing you are doing is awesome, of course it's not some kind of lab grade thing, but at least it's something! At least you showed up, and took it! Never let them get to your head dude. Keep on keeping on and be yourself! Questions guide us closer to the truth. If no one had ever questioned the status quo, we'd still think the Earth is the center of the solar system, and the list goes on and on. Sometimes it can even cost you your life! Asking questions is never wrong, no matter if the answers end up being no. Even knowing that moves you closer to the truth. Rock on!@@TheVoyagerTV
21 день тому
@@TheVoyagerTV unchartedx may have visited/studied these things but has zero answers, soooo
Thank you 4trahasis! I greatly appreciate your comment, your time watching the video, and all of the viewers of my channel. You and the viewers are the true heroes giving me motivation to create these videos.
A very comprehensive collection of theorys. Ive been interested in ancient peruvian stonework for years now. And love hearing new ideas to how this could have been done. One phrase i always try to keep in my head. Is an awnser to a simple question: "why did they take the time and expend so much effort to create this stonework?" Well ... its only logical to assume it was not such a monumental task for them. Its a problem when we view ancient civilizations... while looking through a pinhole sized keyhole. So to speak. There is so much we can not see.
You said " even after trying to polish with a softer stone " . You need a harder stone to scrape , shape or polish a softer stone . Like 911 they used cutting charges behind a pyrotechnic fireball and had to add in an image of 3D grapics of a softer metal and plastic passenger airplane because aluminum and plastic cannot even scratch the huge steel pilkars made from steel as thick as the front door of a house . Steel plates that were approximately 40mm or one and a half inches thick . But the principle is the same . Butterknife cuts butter , but butter does not cut butterknife .
That's not true about cutting the stone. You can 100% scrape down a stone with a softer stone, it just takes time and extra softer stones when it degrades.
@gregorydahl I have hiked along paths in Yellowstone, Arches NP, and other oft visited places with various types of stone where the stone is shiny and polished by all of the oily hands that touched the surface over the years. Millions of visitors touching those rocks along the path made them smooth. So, skin (soft) polishing stone (hard). And it is not oily residue left behind. I have sat and studied these surfaces and explored the same stone below and above to see what they were like where they were not touched. Rough and jagged. These Shiny spots on surfaces that the narrator said were obsidian looked a lot like rocks polished from constant abrasion. Has that black stone been tested to determine that it is obsidian? He seemed to state it emphatically as melted obsidian.
Some people don’t like the idea ancient cultures knew more about stonework than modern humans do today, yet we have lost the knowledge how to go to the moon and return safely back to earth, a knowledge that took only 50 years to disappear.
We did not lose the knowledge of how to go to the moon. The people who claim that are cherry-picking quotes and are usually trying to sell you something.
Some people may not like the idea, but I think most do like the idea that ancient cultures knew more than us, which gives us incentive to forge ahead. The fact is that the governments are the ones that like us to believe that we are the epitome of all knowledge, so that we will sit back in complacency, not knowing that the government has hidden technology from us which is way ahead of what we as a society have access to.
we know how to go to the moon, we just dont have a positive cost-benefit plan that keeps us going there for the moment, it's cheaper to use satelites to study it and rovers to collect and send sample data instead of manned modules, if we want to build on the moon first we need to be able to build everything with drones on earth, the lower gravity is another issue.
Also had this idea. To me it makes sense architects that were so talented and smart to make all these structures that last thousand of years they would be smart enough to start molding building blocks.
The more I see and learn about megalithic sites, the more I'm convinced of a prehistory, advanced civilization existing! To have seen these places at their height would have been quite the experience to say the least! I hope an answer is found in my lifetime, so they better hurry up because I'm 60!
Scientists have analyzed the blocks of Sacsaywaman and they discovered they have the same chemical composition as limestone, but the structure was different from limestone. One of the scientist that took part in the test, said the blocks in Sacsaywaman came from a limestone quarry, but was crushed to fine powder, then it was made into a mixture and molded into blocks. Natural limestone consists of organic material like shells. In the blocks of Sacsaywaman they could see it was pulverized. This is not the case un the natural limestone.
haha...They must have used a gazillion "different" molds then, because almost all ancient stone-work sites (all over Earth) used "different" sized stones. You would suffer much difficulty finding even 2 stones of das exact same proportions und size at any ancient site. Even das sites that look like they used same size stones? When you measure them every stone ist much different, so they were not made from a same mold. Auf Wiedersehen :-)
@@ivankaleoniefuchs333 I am referring to what a scientific analysis in a scientific report shows regarding blocks in Sacsaywanan, not the entire world. How they moulded the blocks, was not part of the analasys. The analysis showed that the particles in the Sacsaywaman blocks were much smaller than what they measured in the limestone quarry. According to the scientist, the limestone would have had to be crushed to powder form in order for the particles to be so small.
Seashells are calcium carbonate and not organic. The stones are limestone and worked by hand that’s why they are all different. If the stones were poured they would have needed moulds that were each the final shape you see today. As beautiful as they are this just exhibits a low technology level not high. This is product of immense physical effort and skill at shaping and working each stone as they built. What’s far more impressive are the flat granite stones with 90 degree corners and angles. Even there no hidden aliens are magic involved just enormous levels of skill and effort.
@@phillipbox7957 I am referring to Geophysicist Andrey Verianov. He was interviewed on the youtube channel of Giacomo Longato. I also made a video on my channel where I read threw the report out load, with all the details.
Romans could hardly be considered barbarians. It was burned accidentally when Caesar burned the Egyptian fleet in the harbor. And most of the books were not entirely lost, they were copies. Most of the books were lost due to purges of pre-christian literature by Christians.
Heard vatican got a lot a it. Peter Peterson had an interview where he described the vatican library with a ton of different type of tablets and book made out of fabrics while working on sumerian writing
Thank you MarkA-rz8mv, l greatly appreciated your comment and how you felt about this video!! It took a lot of time to gather this video content and a lot of time to put it all together. Thanks again!
For those saying a molded approach would use standard shapes, think about molding in-place. You just create a mold off of the prior pours. Much more versatile and the fitment is automatic.
When the evidence shows a decline in technology to a point were the method is lost, there is only one explanation: The technique did not start and evolved in that population but was given by another civilisation and the details gradually lost. A clear example of this devolution is the embalming method in Egypt.
I've heard this claim made before and it could be true. During 00:23:20 in this video, you can see the difference between the ancient stonework and the Inca stonework off to the side. If you'd like to learn more about this mysterious cave, I created a video about it which I included right below. ua-cam.com/video/O2JUiMbiOuA/v-deo.html
The fact a lot of less-technologically advanced modern cultures are next to useless when it comes to archaeology without more 'western' assistance has unfortunately had the knock on effect of a lot of western cultures assuming that every modern less-technologically advanced culture is useless and that they all need help and oversight. Many of them know exactly what they're doing and we don't listen to them because we've tarred them all with inferior comprehension brush. It's annoying how bad we are at contextualizing. So many places in the world do need someone else to do it because they're too useless and bone idle, in other cases though some places know what's going on but no one will listen to them.
Es tan difícil creer que fue creado por nativos americanos? Tuvo que ser un hombre blanco ? Aun teniendo pruebas en las narices se rehusan a creer e inventan teorias rebuscadas
I think sometimes the stone was plugged into a advanced technology that melts the stones together like marshmallows in the oven fusing them together and the nubs that you see in some of the stones are where the device was unplugged leaving the nubs like the bottom of a glasss piece when you break it off when its still soft.
People would rather believe in the so called miracles of the bible than the truth. Truth is just too tedious, too boring, and too hard to find and understand.
You mean the same Bible that talks about the same antediluvian civilizations (including giants) that built these ancient structures? Also, other ancient texts talk about things like the vimana as well, the gods of Greek mythology are similar to the fallen angels of Enoch, etc.
Figuring out history will be like the ending of the Truman Show. "Now what?..." People act as if finding out old stuff will unlock the secret to world peace. Let's say they find Atlantis and prove the pyramids are 12,000 years old. What changes in 2024? Do you not have to go to work anymore? Will war end? People put so much weight on finding out things that really don't matter, just so they can be right about something. That's all it is. People want to say "see, I told you Atlantis was real!".... and then go to bed, and go to work tomorrow, and nothing changes. It's just shit to argue about. "I'm too smart to believe what THEY tell us". Nobody who ever asserts crazy theories has to ever be responsible for them. Making predictions and claims about things that will most likely never be figured out 100% is pretty safe to do. You never have to take criticism for being wrong.
thats a bit out of touch, dont you think? at one point it was the only story people had. at one point it was the way out of darkness. it got us to where we are ("you mean on youtube?"). it could also be argued that religion is a process of fact interpretation, a way of seeking truth. you might even say that its the human condition to wonder which cause us to not be able to just accept things, to disregard what might be truth and look for deeper meaning there-by creating the superstition of religious beliefs(like ken said). earths history and human history are different and yet inseparable. this is like the term "man-made" vs "natural"... you Are nature. maybe better words could be used... sustainable vs unsustainable, in harmony vs intrusive, respectful vs wasteful... beyond that, the storys of ancient civs tell a very different tale under certain light, one which makes thing very clear to me that they werent talking of gods as we know them but they spoke of the very planets which bare the names of those gods. there were plasma phenomena in the ancient sky deep into space and surrounding the other plants in our solar system. the evidence comes from plasma science labs and world wide cave paintings, clay tablets, scrolls, tapestry/imagery/text and of course religious teachings from every age and era. all thru out history the story and warning of a great comet was preserved and prophesied to return... because it already happened once. the stories took on a magic for sake of dramatization because its more important that the story stick and you remember the truth of it than to quibble over details. sure, it turned into "the finger of god" but the truth is a person could never imagine the horror of a 'nuke strike' that would be caused by a meteor let alone planets cascading space lightening and hurling material at each other. that shit mustve been absolutely WILD! no wonder they called them gods.
Maybe it wasn't melted. There is a clay in England that was discovered that had insect dropping in it that had turned the clay into stone. During regular daily excavation of the clay the clay stayed soft. When the crew/s stopped for winter to return in the spring they expected to resume work but they found that the clay had hardened into stone. The discovery was the now exposed clay had been infested by some form of insect and through the insect droppings the clay was hardened. Apparently the chemicals in the insect droppings were a catalyst that caused the clay to harden just like rock. I seems to me the article was posted about 8 years ago. I wouldn't know where to find it.
@@NextWorldVR If people of today's age can accidentally find a way to convert clay to stone... exactly. Scientists finally found the Romans built "better concrete than we normally use.Their secret ingredient was salt. Lime (a key in some concrete) gets warm with just the right amount of water. If the lime is heated enough to become what is called "quick lime" it can become reactive meaning if held under pressure it will get hot enough to rupture/explode. I recently found out that powdered magnesium, a health supplement, which is mixed with water for consumption, will get hot if it isn't mixed with enough water. There was a warning on the bottle of the powdered magnesium. Why can't today's builders make structures like the did in the past? Probably because we haven't learned what chemistry the ancients were using. Imagine pouring a stone house on top of a stone basement one bucket at a time. Except for the windows and doors it would be practically tornado or hurricane proof.
@@harrywalker968 There were hundreds of tons that had to be moved yet as ;you say it is a guess. there were thousands of people who built those walls and if they knew the chemistry which their shape indicates was not natural. Iron and lime were in the walls as well showing man made construction indicating engineering not chiseling. A catalyst is a reasonable approach. yes that is another poke at a guess. What are a couple of yours?
@@dustinpotter8312 Engineering...that takes advanced geometric and mathematical skills. These people weren't using chisels and stone mallets to carve these things. That takes advanced knowledge. So who stole all that knowledge away and set us back into the stone age? We've been trying to crawl up the tech scale ever since and now we're at a point the military industrial complex is hiding knowledge from us yet again.
Could have used a old sort of 'Snatch Block' with several ropes and a small team of men. 1 man can move 100 ton stones with the right setup of Snatch Blocks and Ropes. Just sayin...
Amazing the further you go back in time, you find advanced building methods, much of today's mathematics are from thousands of years ago, and complex languages were used. We had a great start then messed it up. One can only wonder how advanced human society would be by now if we listened.
They used thick red clay mined from acidic hot springs applied between the stones and left for some weeks, repeatedly lifted and refitted with incremental chiseling of the softened layer each time.
They used hydrofloric acid to melt the stones to the constacistancy of play dough, that's why the seams are so tight. The same Floride used in tooth paste and city drinking water.
Ancient civilizations had more advanced technologies than we do and our civilization makes the biggest mistake when we think we’re the top of the crème… Stone would change its color to a dark charcoal if melted and it would become porous and brittle. What the Ancients did is Use Sound to change the molecular arrangement of stone and mold it to any shape they wanted like when a high frequency note is played next to a crystal wine cup and if you slow down that FPS (frames per second), you can observe the crystal structure vibrate along and bend with the sound waves and if the frequency is amped, it will break. Sound properly ‘modulated’ has the power to restructure any material, Lift its weight by reducing it “mass weight” so it can be handle and transported and Sound can cut like a laser beam although is not visible to the naked eye just like a dog whistle that only a dog can hear but is imperceptible to the human ear. That’s how the pyramids got built and many other monoliths and construction wonders around the world and yes, the Sound Catalysts Tools were of Alien Origin.
24:56 Perhaps these walls once had a beautiful obsidian coating that is mostly worn away now? Or maybe it was applied in certain areas for a certain effect, weather cosmetic, or cosmic?
With the amount of ancient places throughout the region that have this obsidian coating on the stones, I believe so. If it did have a purpose besides it being aesthetic, it would have been very creative and useful.
@@TheVoyagerTV it’s pretty amazing that it’s there at all, and in so many places…what a strange idea! Unless it was easy to do, they probably wouldn’t have done it. It probably was a sight to see in original times.
@@Tom_Emody: I disagree with the part where you suggest that only if it is easy to wpuld they have done it. Because these were done out of purpose, seeming really rather important to these people. .....And time? What else did they have???? Generations of only time and caring labor. Other than that though, I completely agree with ya! And if I misread what you meant then I am sorry.
Who ever and how ever they did it , it must have been very very easy and quick and with very very high technology not permeative tools and techniques. One can work on any small material given the years of time but to make what they have which we see all over the world is just impossible even with current technologies!
Excellent video. The enigma of the blue obsidian on the stones deserves some XRay fluoresce analysis. The blue color of the melted obsidian (a glass silicate) could arise from a copper silicate. Isn't that suggesting you they used some natural CuFeS2 ore during the thermal process? SiO2 (obsidian) is not so difficult to melt.
it is quite a step forward, but leaves mäny questions open. Would be interesting to find out how the "scoop marks" had been produced (as they can be found all over the world). This must have been done with a kind of "normed" tool (as they all look the same) and by smoothening the stone, so they could just remove it like butter. But we should be able to find some chemical traces on the surface of the stone. Until now I know nobody who came up with a plausible explication. You are the first - kind of
To me they look like scoop marks, yes. They also look like where someone has pounded out a hollow, then moved along a bit and pounded out another; and another. But why, how, who, and when I leave to (a) educated experts (b) opinionated guessers, or (c) religious fruitcakes (any brand). Surely this chicken could be laid to roost simply enough? (Yes, I know ...economics, and the funding thereof.)
There's a very interesting 'throwaway' mention in the book "Exploration Fawcett" you might find relevant. (If you can find a copy, a wee bit out of print now, I'd say.) Good luck ...
@tomemody6685 Yep. Heat & speed both = moving molecules. As when they spin steel cylinders so they can turn the tops in to make gas bottles, like spinning clay to make pots. No "heat" on the steel needed, just a fast spin...
@tomemody6685 Glad you find welding fascinating! I'm sometimes afraid I'm a nerdy welding bore! ...Maybe by using the same principle? Getting the molecules to momentarily separate, then let them re-fuse? You know how when you heat granite all the grains separate out, because the differently coloured ones expand at different rates, & you end up with something like a heap of demerara sugar on the floor. They won't stick back together. But other substances do ... Water after its been boiled, metal after its been forged, lava after its been heated and cooled (with or without resultant vitrification.) Supposing something was used to oscillate the molecules of this stone till they began to separate, after sprinkling the surface with monatomic gold to make it weightless, the resulting loose stone~cloud could be pushed or blown through the air to where it's wanted then the monatomic gold layer scooped off & the stone let settle back into shape, in place. This would also explain why the stones have a "poured" quality, as they'd have the opportunity to settle & sag into spaces, leaving no gaps. (Although if old enough, non-crystalline stone will sag anyway, as does other unlikely materials --- see sags in glass after a few hundred years.) There could of course be simpler metaphysical explanations, such as someone using telekinesis to move and meld the stone.
viper tv sumerian tablets. . they hold a cone, & have a bag for it.. was this a weapon,,or tool.. seeing there the aliens that made man,, . some dick, said, '' if they were so advanced, why did they use gigantic stone for everything''.. i said. ITS STILL THERE.... .
I have been totally thinking the same "melting" concept for years...no idea how they would have done this, but when thinking about all the "hows" melting was always at the top of my list. Of course my friends all think I'm nuts.
I think the ancients had a special cement formula mix with volcanic Ash or soil and used wood boxes to make mould to allow it to set. The tool marks are there to finish off some imperfections. Also the large bolders that seem to have perfect melted joints are just irregular cement blocks that is placed on site with no mold required. 😅
At 19:00 It looks like they POURED concrete into molds. Obviously, they had a high-strength recipe for concrete. It also looks like the "stones" that are not formed are simply left over slumps of this "concrete". This could also explain how they built pyramids, no more guessing how they "lifted" great sizes of stones into place, they simply poured into forms in place.
Nothing was melted. Sand was placed on top of a stone, and another stone was placed on that sand. Then the top stone was slid back and forth until the sand carved both the top and bottom rocks into matching pieces. It required a lot of labor, which is easy if your civilization is founded on slave labor (which took on many forms in pre-Columbian South America).
@@BigGuyWhoKills Not so. You're saying a rough and immense stone was ground down to fit another stone under it, which would take decades to achieve per stone, with a material hard enough to wear down the top stone but not wear down the bottom stone. It won't work.
@@oldmanjoe6808 It is literally how surface plates were first made. The difference is that surface plates are made with 3 stones, repeatedly paired until a flat surface is achieved. The medium may need to be something other than sand, but quibbling about that is pedantry.
@@AdamHowellProvo All wrong. Mechanical properties can not be changed by human imagination... I have no need to "pedantry" about mechanical properties, just to rather correct the unlearned.
@@oldmanjoe6808 What mechanical properties do you claim I am wishing to alter? I may be wrong, but here's a guy doing exactly what I described (albeit to a MUCH greater precision): ua-cam.com/video/iIQrVQs8luU/v-deo.htmlsi=sI68Fl5U6Yyca3mO&t=449 Also, you claim I said: "wear down the top stone but not wear down the bottom stone", when in reality I said pretty much the opposite: "Then the top stone was slid back and forth until the sand carved both the top and bottom rocks into matching pieces."
Plasmoids. A mixture of electricity sound etc. They knew the earth and the magnetics make sense. They did indeed melted stone or made it soft enough to be scooped/molded. Then when the electricity is turned off, it locks the shape in place. How they lifted? Same thing, using the electricity and the holes theyd use copper rods and a plate one positive one negative to essentially levitate the rocks. The legends notes this that people would shape the rocks then float them into place.
Too much supposition especially in the drill holes. That vibration method doesn’t match the drill striations. Good info but too much “could it” in the layout. Next take the proposed “dates”. Dating stone is pretty difficult and using other methods assumes the stones were placed/worked at that same time instead of being discovered or re-used.
Your theory is a fact... ancient people, used melted rocks and sands, and used molding patterns to form stone blocks. How they carried the stones and stock them on top of one another? It was easy for ancient people and builders. It was being performed by this man who posted in his YT channel how to move huge stone blocks..
I have some friends from Mexico and from what they told me the rock that you are looking at was formed in a molten state like concrete today but very thick and heavy,it was carved like woodcarving . The stuf in between was to make it harden up fast like salt in concret during the winter.
any plans, written records, drawings, of this.. no.. man did not build this. like the pyramids, if man built them as they say, they still wouldnt be finished..
Kind of makes sense. This is why bronze ties were used. They would be not be needed to hold magaton stone together but would help to hold clay-like bricks together while drying. Drying clay-like composites would have shrinkage and so open up joints.
why would they make a false door? because its not false. if they knew how to do this then they knew how to do other things. if anyone was found doing this irl they would vanish. Our owners dont want us using such things. Gold is very dense it is non reactive chemically so it resists corrosion its rare its pretty it conducts electricity its dielectric (moves away from magnetic fields) i agree it must have some quality we are not aware of perhaps. great video btw you sound as good as preveen mohan and he has over a million subs. you sound great and have good insights.
Today is the first time I have listened to your contents of your show and I'm very impressed the work you've done had to be tedious putting this video together I have the subscribed to your channel and look forward to more other videos thank you
Thank you PatrickcWinter! It meant a lot to me to read your comment and for you to subscribe to my channel. You're correct; it was tedious and took some time to complete this video. What took the most time was traveling to these places multiple times over the years to research them and to film them. I promise to keep creating more videos!
Sakrete! They filled cloth sacks with their geopolymer mix and braced the outside to form the shape they wanted. The glaze on the outside is easily attained today by using smooth plastic sacks. I would think the same glazing can be achieved by oiling/greasing the sacks smooth before pouring them with the geopolymer.
???... so,, where are the remains of the sacks,??,, this means, you fill the sack, place it, wait till it dries, remove it, take the sack off, then re place it,, fkn bs..
Jonathon you are correct, read in the bible the making of the tower of bable, the used mudbrick and they found something in the area, this something was oil, with wich they made the bricks waterproof, it became to be this glazing layer
@@miller2675 I am a contractor and i build walls with hammers and other tools .But you do not do it with 100 or 1000 ton stones you can't and you don't know what you are talking about.
Yeah i got beat for telling my teachers stuff like this when i was a kid - And now to see more people have finally been working on this publicly fkn love it
As I am an artist , I have been working with cement, /concrete lately. Then I began to wonder….. what if monolithic stones were created by melting or making a more sophisticated concrete structures. I’m not buying the Ancient alien hypothesis., on megalithic stones. , it’s an easy out for those that wish to cover up a faults historical storyline. I have wondered about many of the same details you have focused in the video. The human race has a far more technological history than those that have written history would want us to believe. I believe we are what was left of the beginning. Something catastrophic happened 13-10,000 years ago which drove us back into a “Stone Age” and much information was lost. If we were to know the truth we would question everything we in western society believe to be true. The Bible would be a book of fables, as would the Koran. Then those that have power would no longer have power over hearts and souls.
The premise that drystacked masonry structures were poured in molten stone is the most moronic horseshit clickbait on social media. It shows a lack of comprehension of the history of masonry, and also of the foundry processes that are proposed.
This was just one of many methods that these ancient builders used. What's so wrong with using one of these methods? The ancients didn't use just geopolymer. Check out my video Ancient Andean Cement for more information & evidence on this one method that was used in South America. ua-cam.com/video/LacJ326yYws/v-deo.html
"Ancient humans melted stone." And then they crafted many thousands of individual forms with different dimensions to put the molten stone into for making building blocks. That's not very efficient. Why would they even do that?
They would do that because these construction methods were easy for them to handle. The materials used were not scarce, and the type of labor was widely known. These ancient sites were also created from either multiple construction methods or mainly one with only some other techniques. Puma Punku was mainly a geopolymer, while Sacsayhuaman was a mixture of multiple ancient stone construction methods. The part about melting is the outside finish they included a lot of these polygonal shaped blocks, which I explain in the video, along with including photographs from a digital field microscope.
@@TheVoyagerTVSo why is there no evidence at all for the forms constructed to shape the molten polymer blocks? And no local tradition for making such forms. A lot of textiles have survived, so why not the construction forms? Your theory lacks evidence.
I've always figured that the stones (world-wide) were melted into place. The consistently-found beveled edges should be a clue for us. Your idea that it was somewhat chemical in nature is not quite what I was thinking, but it's interesting at least.
@@pyotrberia9741 I don't believe this is necessarily true. Perhaps for very high temperatures it is, but I assume that if someone could melt large quantities of stone, they could control the temperature fairly carefully. All of this being said, I am hardly an expert on the behavior of various rocks at high temperatures.
@@AltonMoore If you can melt and then form rock into whatever shapes you want, why bother with all these odd shapes, and dont tell me its for earth quake prevention because the shapes are random. Also if they melted the rock, why are some of the sides rough. On top of this the amount of energy to melt stone into basically lava would be incredible. A lot of these locations do not have the energy source. Unless aliens of course, but why would freaking aliens travel the vastness of space just to come build some crappy stone structures. This is all just more bullshit theories, people just need to recognize that we don't know for sure how these things were built but instead our ancestors were very ingenious people.
Great video. Humans from early times have always demonstrated a great ability to learn, and demonstrate much prowess for engineering and creativity. We just have to discover their methods.
Thank you for your comment kermitefrog64 and I completely agree with you. They were smart and used very clever but primitive methods to create their stone structures from only what was available around them.
If you got the faces hot enough before setting the stone in place it would press into the proper shape and tolerance without needing precision cuts. 🤔 Those "H" blocks though, geopoolymer makes more sense.
@@harrywalker968 Have a think about it before you naysay my friend ✌️ One simple solution would be to ignite thermite between the two surfaces before setting them. It was merely a thought experiment. 👍
stone isn't butter, they don't necessarily simply soften from heat. some just get brittle. ¿and thermite in a time before metallurgy? good luck refining the bauxite into aluminum to begin with.
The obsidian is a nice find. What you found is what's left of what they originally looked it. Yes we're talking about hundreds of thousands of years of normal weathering, or thousands of years of INTENSE weathering. Take your pick. Either way, all these megaliths are heavily weathered. All of them. I also strongly believe that especially those scattered and irregular pieces that make no sense, are leftovers from VERY old structures that got destroyed. And anything you see that has indentations on it, be certain that something was fitted in it. Something that's long gone. Probably machinery.
This is the most reasonable proposal for the construction method. A solvent welding mortar, or a melted obsidian layer between stacked rocks. Along with decent masonry and or geopolymers, that would make sense.
I have a sewing instructions DVD narrated by a Chinese lady and the manner of speaking and accent is the same lol. So well pronounced and carefully spoken lol. Very entertaining 😁
These people had nothing but time and no modern distractions. They got skilled in their craft, handing down techniques to their kids, and put in the time and labor.
Ok this is something I have been working on. Have you guys seen the man who melts all kind of things rocks and metals using the rear screen from an old rear projector tv. He made a frame and used to focus sunlight, like all of us did with a magnifying glass when we were children. This set a light bulb moment, obviously they didn’t have rear projector tv but they did have crystals and crystals were something they had access to and used. I have been able to melt rock using crystal and the sun. I am not able to cut anything accurately but it works. If this interests anyone let me know and I can give you more information. Pls accept my English it’s not my first language.
Archeologists have found homo sapiens remains in France which are almost 300.000 yo, that means that the modern human have been around for at least that long. Our civilization is only 8000 yo. What humans did 290.000 years? It is totally reasonable to imagine that multiple civilizations have risen and fall before us.
the planet is old enough for multiple races to have evolved, build things, die off have the remains turn to dust, be swallowed by oceans and magma.
It's only logical. 🖖
I'm not sure where you found that homo sapiens have existed in Europe 300,000 years ago, could you point to a source? I found only that a population of homo sapiens may have been around southern France for only a roughly 40 year period around 80,000 years ago. These remains of homo sapiens found in Europe only prove that they had *once* existed there, not that they had *continuously* existed there.
Homo sapiens as a species, if I'm not mistaken, are only 300k yo themselves. I'm sure plenty that is lost to history has happened over the full breadth of human existence, but much of that existence was that of a hunter-gatherer. I'm not asserting this was your implication, but they certainly didn't waste 290,000 years of history; they had their own cultures and histories, and left us some wonderful remnants of both! Could there be crazier stuff we haven't scratched the surface of? Sure! But what was left behind as we understand it is itself incredible.
With the right frequency you can do anything.
Like you said risen n fallen
So nice to hear explanations that don’t involve Aliens, thank you.
Some of the ancient pyramids were blocks with pieces of sea shells. A type of cement we are beginning to understand.
Where do you think we got the tech from and if they had all that knowledge back then, why didn't have it a century ago and why did we 'forget' so much knowledge? These are things people don't question. If it was ancient people, what happened to the tech? It was taken from us, forgotten by later generations, and now they hide the truth from us. Yes, true evil does exist in human form. They want to keep us dumbed down and in the dark about everything they know. Don't believe in non-terrestrial beings...see only what THEY want you to see. That's just what they want. We aren't alone, never will be, and will never be. There's too much evidence to the contrary that says there are non-terrestrials and they have visited this world and taught many cultures about many things. Start the research. It WILL change your mind.
Project Blue Beam
@@stevemckennon5995 no
What is wrong with aliens it doesn't necessarily mean Little Green Men we have a massive solar system you honestly believe that we are the only intelligent beings there is no way we could have done it you just have to accept that😊
I am a super huge "Ancient High Technology" person and this video is nothing short of a revelation. AHT doesn't mean "aliens" it means "We dont' know, yet." There is SO much stuff here that stretches and challenges my mind. This is nuts. Dammit. They did this, and yet this is still only scratching the surface
@spacedaddy5517 I spent 9 months living in Egypt studying the ancient sites and I didn't see ANY evidence of what you show here, over there, is what I mean, sorry
mate the idea is bull and has been debunked repeatedly.
This is not what "debunking" looks like@@tommyfred6180
Im a dude with decades of history in c theories like aliens, ancient advanced technonolgy, but over time im finally getting the wisdom in this space , thevtruthbisbprobably somewhere in the middle , not in flat earthers side not in "experts" side, both are wrong , the common sense side is some where in the middle.
Common sense says if egyptian had precision cutting technology and high technology in general, they would have depicted the "technology" on stones , advanced tools , advanced boats , even more advanced writting letters ,nowhere they are found but having melting skills or geopolymer skills existing along those primitive tools theyve depicted on stones makes more sense , bcuz fire existed, the sun existed to use to melt stones with solar lens, the ability to mix certain soils to make geopolymer existed , and such a civilization would have had primitive boats for example without any machinery inside and it doesnt contradict the melting and geopolymer theories.
But ancient advanced tech is against common sense , bcuz common sense says as time passes we get more advanced bcuz we discover new perspective on world , thus for the past world we need the simplest explainations instead of complicating theories like advanced past that make us totally unable to speculate at all, its like we make a new invisible realm that we dont access and no matter how much we try we would stay in darkness bcuz those times are gone and we dont have time travel machine to discover their unique alien like techs and life
ua-cam.com/video/_KbSFphHCZY/v-deo.html
I can't wait till someone demonstrates this method of stone work..
I absolutely applaud the depth you have gone into researching these hanan pacha sites and the knowledge you have shared is incredible. For every 10 videos on these ancient sites there's 1 that puts forth truly useful and insightful information. We only build on the shoulders of giants and you are a giant whose work has brought us closer to a clear image of what capabilities these cultures were able to create. I have never heard anyone state the chupa towers could equate to industrial furnaces and from your analysis seems so obvious. Just outstanding communication of the Inca history and compelling arguments overall. 👏 👏👏👏👏👏 after seeing this, I believe the mushroom courtyard could have been a workshop for creating curved metalworks on large scale and for a variety of curvatures eg. Shields, headware, ornaments. I'm honestly blown away. Another piece of the puzzle strongly set in place. 🙏
Thank you tairynngatai7095, your comment was incredibly thoughtful. This video was a collection from most of the knowledge that I've learned while traveling to these ancient places over the years. I've toured with local guides and have talked to their elders about the stories & legends they hold about these places. I've also toured with people from the History & Discovery Channel. I have also read the book The Travels of Pedro de Cieza de León who was a conquistador who traveled to Peru 500 years ago and documented any knowledge of these places & the Inca civilization as well. From all of this, these stones tell a much bigger story.
I believe our ancient ancestors were much smarter than what we perceive they are today. They have also created monuments and structures that either are in ruins, are still buried, or have been destroyed throughout time.
@@TheVoyagerTV I can't state how critical it is for people with such a strongly invested interest such as yourself to put forth this significant information so the true history of these sites are brought to light, as there is still such a small community around the world that see the importance of these sites and the knowledge they hold. You are helping change the perception of the ancient past and the inconsistencies that we have been taught in so many conventional formats. I hope to visit some of these sites and build on this knowledge as well and thank you for the book reference I will find a copy so I can be further enlightened on this subject.
The oxalate observation I've made myself a few years ago.
While reducing birch sap to make beer I noticed that when I skimmed the top with a spoon the material I banged out on a rock had a caustic reaction with the stone. Chaga, which grows only on birch trees, has the highest oxalate count of any other living organism. It was very satisfying to me to hear of this observation from others.
Sweet, hows the beer?
Is this similar to the chemical etchings that native tribes in the American southwest used to leave petroglyphs?
So....how did the beer turn out?
very earthy, lol. I reduced about 100 gallons of sap down to 5 gallons of syrup and added yeast. Birch sap has a rather violent fermentation.@@jthepickle7
@@dukeofthedance8062he's got Ole Willie over I think. He's past 90 years old and looks every day lol. He made it a few years ago so it was good beer.
If they did have the ability to make stone like cement, then they probably would have used a mold to pour the mixture into. In this case all the stones would be the same size.
Not true. The different sizes and shapes make it stronger. Our ancestors understood the volatility of earth and built to last.
@@somewhereinhawaii3663 It's 3:00.in the morning here. I guess it is afternoon in Hawaii.
There was no need for uniformity. I'm sure many of their buildings were uniformly built but not of them still stand except from the BASE of the non-uniform megalithic ones. Which obviously means they did this on purpose, in order to last. It's also much easier and faster to just place random sized pieces on top of eachother. The previous pieces have already hardened and the next ones will simply sit on top of them and take their shape. Easy. No need for alignment or proper fitment.
The exterior side we see could have been make of cloth or tightly woven matt used in the molds. That would account for the bulged out appearance. The flat joins part of the mold could have been made of wood or stone.
Yes it would be common sense to repeatedly use the same mould size. It would be a lot less work.
Stone (Granite, Diorite, Feldspar etc.) cannot be 'melted' unless kept in a temperature controlled vacuum, why?
When certain types of rocks or minerals are heated to a high temperature and then rapidly cooled, they can turn into a non-crystalline, amorphous solid known as glass. This process is called vitrification. The rapid cooling prevents the atoms in the material from arranging themselves into a crystalline structure, resulting in the formation of a non-crystalline, transparent or translucent material. This is how volcanic obsidian, for example, is formed when molten rock cools rapidly.
Also because the other component minerals in the stone react with available Oxygen in the air causing Oxidation.
Try making an autoclave, a Vacuum Chamber, big enough to hold a 100 ton block of granite, it would be absolutely HUGE!!
I believe at 00:38:45 and further into the video, it's mentioned that the Sillustani towers in Peru may have been primitive autoclaves for this process.
Shhh.. stop noticing.
Do you really want to bring science into this?
I also noticed this. There is a guy on youtube who was melting obsidian and trying to cast primative weapons. He blew out his kiln and several crucibles trying to do it. He wanted to see if ancient people might have made sand cast weapons with melted obsidian.
They key is to have it cool really quickly. That is how obsidian forms from volcanos. It cools quickly and becomes like you said glasslike and Vitrified.
I did fire a simple rock in my kiln from some decorative gravel for landscaping. I fired it in a ceramic box and this stone was just like obsidian after, when I opened the box. However it fused to the inside of the box. Like a glaze would do. It went into the kiln, rough, geometric, and grayish blue. It came out rounded and like black glass. Was shocking tbh.
I have fired other lava rock and such, in the same temperature range but it didn't change at all.
That could be the magic though, building something big enough to do it on 100 ton blocks. Whatever they had it was more advanced than anything we have now.
I think the better question is why do we find the same building megalithic methods all around the world? Peru, Italy, Egypt, Spain, Bolivia, Easter Island. I thought there was no contact between them?
I don't know, maybe because they're the same species. I mean hell, why do people develop languages or build huts even though there's no contact between them. It's called natural instinct, explained by evolutionary psychology.
Who said there was no contact? There was ancient chaman body found with different drugs around the world. It shows that they knew about each other.
Because we came here on ships built as cities. YES WE as humans. Like our modern day cruise ships but bigger. The schools instilled the same building techniques because of the technology they brought and understood. It is obvious that if you were going to other planets, you would use technology to build protection and shelter with an abundant resource on all planets. STONE.
I always thought that the stones looked like cement. If they pulverized the stone, then it could be carried to the place they wanted and pored into forms. This would eliminate the need to move multi ton blocks of stone.
Perhaps both large stones and pulverized stone were transported to the site. The large stones were shaped and chiseled into their basic shape, and then a geopolymer outside finish was placed onto the stone. This could explain why all H-shaped blocks are very similar, but the dimensions are all different as if they were handmade and not by a cast.
Why would you create so many different shaped “forms?” Any society who uses or has used forms have created a universal design.
@@frankedgar6694because it's stronger.
@@somewhereinhawaii3663 Yeah. Sure. You nailed it. Look at the shapes. Those shapes are obtained because of existing stone shapes. You peck away at the surface on both stones to create seamless interfacing of the stone. It is impossible to crush stone, put it on a mold and come out with solid stone afterwards.
Presume you’re correct though. How do you create exact molds to fit existing stone surfaces? Think it through.
they are volcanic or appear to be so andersite is a very hard rock comes from deep in the earth has a lot of gas at times in it
Those H blocks from Bolivia absolutely look like poured & formed concrete.
And they were made using the metric system. Using a laser they are 1 meter and a tiny fraction of a millimeter tall. The horizontal gap between the vertical H lines was 22 cm and a tiny fraction of a millimeter. Those millimeter fractions are attributed to weathering. Weird...
If you are interested the Funny Olde World channel has a great documentary where they measure them along with other ancient sites all over the world. It is called Builders of Ancient Technology.
Yes they do. Wonder what the molds were made from. The rabbit hole just got deeper.
If they could form the stones wouldn't they have formed them more uniformly
@@andrewpatricknelson They were artists at heart.
Well, they're not.
The ancient writings tell us, the ancient people used a plane based paste form of hydro-floric acid as a mortar, that softened the surface to a stone to the softness of paste, and when the hydrogen evaporated, it left the stones as hard as they were before the procedure.
With joints are so perfect that nothing can go between the stones. The knobs were electric discharge nodes to draw off the natural electric charge of the earth from places people frequent.
they did not use it as mortar, nor was it some acid. looking at various sites, its clear that various techniques were deployed which all made use of chemical softening in sometimes, particularly in egypt, it was combined with mechanical cutting. there are site in south america that look like they liquified rock faces that were left in the ground and just reshaped into a useful form, such as stairs. for the polygonal walls, there are stone left over that are bent, which clearly tell us that they soaked the entire rock in a liquid that made it soft, and it was previously cut into a roughly fitting shape, and then after it was soft, it was placed on top of others, where it settled into its place, filling the corners perfectly under its own weight and pressure. too smooth it, they applied the liquid afterwards, and then scraped the rock flat. you can see this on the casing stones of the pyramids that have unfinished ones left, and also on rock in some wall in the Osirion, where you can clearly see rough stone and smooth stone above on the same stone, like someone went over it with something that flattened it like a paste while the rocks where already in place.
@@sshreddderr9409what is the name of that Site in South America with the faces seemingly softened & molded/reformed into stairs? Sounds really interesting and surprising to witness
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🙉🙉🙉🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤷🤷🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤪🪒
Hog wash
Lol electrical discharge nodes? The examples in the video are valid
This is a priceless timeless offering to the world. I can’t even imagine the work and education that’s gone into it. We thank you deeply.
the ancients might have not used electricity to cut stone but instead used Energy, frequency and vibration in away to not just make stone easier to cut but also to move, vibration makes sound and sound makes energy which in turn makes vibration frequency can be turned into magnetism electricity or heat
Great job with your videos bro! Love that edit in the beginning where you are standing in the window lol. Where is the opening scene shot, Sacsayhuaman? The GLOBAL polygonal stone builders are easily one of the most fascinating mysteries of all time. I totally agree with you about your perspective on precision, Ben over at UnchartedX also focuses on the precision aspect because it is truly remarkable. Once you've worked with stone yourself, you see structures like these and finally understand the actual gravity and astonishing awe of what they accomplished. Thanks for making these and getting more great shots of these important historical sites! Rock on dude ~
Thank you so much for your comment and the opinion on my work, it means a lot to hear. Yes the introduction is from Sacsayhuaman in Cusco, Peru. I know it seems like I could've just filmed and created that scene but that one section was currently blocked off.
Yes I completely agree that the global polygonal stone builders are incredibly fascinating. You can find all different types of polygonal stone walls and the quality of the construction method ranges.
Ben at UnchartedX has done an incredible amount of research and I find his videos to be very compelling by challenging the type of technology used during the ancient past. I would love to see his research done on other ancient artifacts from around the world as his work is unique to this field of research.
As always, thank you for the view and it's a passion of mine to show everyone and to talk about these ancient achievements during antiquity.
🗿🤘!
You're doing a great job bro. Because you're going against the grain, lots of haters will come at you. Like those guys picking on your use of the digital microscope in a previous video's comments. I think that kind of thing you are doing is awesome, of course it's not some kind of lab grade thing, but at least it's something! At least you showed up, and took it! Never let them get to your head dude. Keep on keeping on and be yourself! Questions guide us closer to the truth. If no one had ever questioned the status quo, we'd still think the Earth is the center of the solar system, and the list goes on and on. Sometimes it can even cost you your life! Asking questions is never wrong, no matter if the answers end up being no. Even knowing that moves you closer to the truth. Rock on!@@TheVoyagerTV
@@TheVoyagerTV unchartedx may have visited/studied these things but has zero answers, soooo
Top notch video.
Been curious about so many of these details, and here you brought science, geology, geographical exploration and more.
Instant sub.
Thank you 4trahasis! I greatly appreciate your comment, your time watching the video, and all of the viewers of my channel. You and the viewers are the true heroes giving me motivation to create these videos.
A very comprehensive collection of theorys. Ive been interested in ancient peruvian stonework for years now. And love hearing new ideas to how this could have been done.
One phrase i always try to keep in my head. Is an awnser to a simple question: "why did they take the time and expend so much effort to create this stonework?" Well ... its only logical to assume it was not such a monumental task for them.
Its a problem when we view ancient civilizations... while looking through a pinhole sized keyhole. So to speak. There is so much we can not see.
Very well said. Thank you for your insight.
You said " even after trying to polish with a softer stone " .
You need a harder stone to scrape , shape or polish a softer stone .
Like 911 they used cutting charges behind a pyrotechnic fireball and had to add in an image of 3D grapics of a softer metal and plastic passenger airplane because aluminum and plastic cannot even scratch the huge steel pilkars made from steel as thick as the front door of a house . Steel plates that were approximately 40mm or one and a half inches thick . But the principle is the same . Butterknife cuts butter , but butter does not cut butterknife .
So much of the work shows real art, which only comes from advanced civilizations and really no one knows how long ago.
That's not true about cutting the stone. You can 100% scrape down a stone with a softer stone, it just takes time and extra softer stones when it degrades.
@gregorydahl I have hiked along paths in Yellowstone, Arches NP, and other oft visited places with various types of stone where the stone is shiny and polished by all of the oily hands that touched the surface over the years.
Millions of visitors touching those rocks along the path made them smooth.
So, skin (soft) polishing stone (hard). And it is not oily residue left behind. I have sat and studied these surfaces and explored the same stone below and above to see what they were like where they were not touched. Rough and jagged.
These Shiny spots on surfaces that the narrator said were obsidian looked a lot like rocks polished from constant abrasion.
Has that black stone been tested to determine that it is obsidian?
He seemed to state it emphatically as melted obsidian.
Some people don’t like the idea ancient cultures knew more about stonework than modern humans do today, yet we have lost the knowledge how to go to the moon and return safely back to earth, a knowledge that took only 50 years to disappear.
We did not lose the knowledge of how to go to the moon. The people who claim that are cherry-picking quotes and are usually trying to sell you something.
Some people may not like the idea, but I think most do like the idea that ancient cultures knew more than us, which gives us incentive to forge ahead. The fact is that the governments are the ones that like us to believe that we are the epitome of all knowledge, so that we will sit back in complacency, not knowing that the government has hidden technology from us which is way ahead of what we as a society have access to.
we know how to go to the moon, we just dont have a positive cost-benefit plan that keeps us going there for the moment, it's cheaper to use satelites to study it and rovers to collect and send sample data instead of manned modules, if we want to build on the moon first we need to be able to build everything with drones on earth, the lower gravity is another issue.
Many more knowledge like the Roman concrete far superior to our modern concrete or the greek fire
Or we never went to the moon 😂
Also had this idea. To me it makes sense architects that were so talented and smart to make all these structures that last thousand of years they would be smart enough to start molding building blocks.
The more I see and learn about megalithic sites, the more I'm convinced of a prehistory, advanced civilization existing! To have seen these places at their height would have been quite the experience to say the least! I hope an answer is found in my lifetime, so they better hurry up because I'm 60!
Our ancient ancestors where alchemists. An art that is practically lost in modern times.
u'r so stupid...
Scientists have analyzed the blocks of Sacsaywaman and they discovered they have the same chemical composition as limestone, but the structure was different from limestone. One of the scientist that took part in the test, said the blocks in Sacsaywaman came from a limestone quarry, but was crushed to fine powder, then it was made into a mixture and molded into blocks. Natural limestone consists of organic material like shells. In the blocks of Sacsaywaman they could see it was pulverized. This is not the case un the natural limestone.
haha...They must have used a gazillion "different" molds then, because almost all ancient stone-work sites (all over Earth) used "different" sized stones. You would suffer much difficulty finding even 2 stones of das exact same proportions und size at any ancient site. Even das sites that look like they used same size stones? When you measure them every stone ist much different, so they were not made from a same mold. Auf Wiedersehen :-)
@@ivankaleoniefuchs333 I am referring to what a scientific analysis in a scientific report shows regarding blocks in Sacsaywanan, not the entire world. How they moulded the blocks, was not part of the analasys. The analysis showed that the particles in the Sacsaywaman blocks were much smaller than what they measured in the limestone quarry. According to the scientist, the limestone would have had to be crushed to powder form in order for the particles to be so small.
Seashells are calcium carbonate and not organic. The stones are limestone and worked by hand that’s why they are all different. If the stones were poured they would have needed moulds that were each the final shape you see today. As beautiful as they are this just exhibits a low technology level not high. This is product of immense physical effort and skill at shaping and working each stone as they built. What’s far more impressive are the flat granite stones with 90 degree corners and angles. Even there no hidden aliens are magic involved just enormous levels of skill and effort.
What scientist.
@@phillipbox7957 I am referring to Geophysicist Andrey Verianov. He was interviewed on the youtube channel of Giacomo Longato. I also made a video on my channel where I read threw the report out load, with all the details.
There is no doubts that these are works influenced by intelligent species from other worlds other planets. It's as simple as that.
How do you account for all the different shapes?
Super interesting! Keep it coming!
Congratulations 👏🏼
Although there are many mysteries still to unveil it's an amazing research you have done 👍🏼
The answers to all ancient mysteries could have been found in the Library of Alexandria. Sad that barbarians burned it all up.
Barbarians or humanitarians who knows what evil could have been. Just imagine the power to unlock the atom during an early archaic age.
The Alexandria Library was burned by Fundamentalist Christians allegedly,A problem that is very apparant now with islam.
Romans could hardly be considered barbarians. It was burned accidentally when Caesar burned the Egyptian fleet in the harbor. And most of the books were not entirely lost, they were copies. Most of the books were lost due to purges of pre-christian literature by Christians.
Heard vatican got a lot a it. Peter Peterson had an interview where he described the vatican library with a ton of different type of tablets and book made out of fabrics while working on sumerian writing
The catholics burned it.
This was a truly magnificent video. Just showed it to some homies. We all found it enlightening and almost therapeutic.
Thank you Saveriomastrianni1726! I tend to make my videos in that type of tone to make it easier to listen to on the ear and soul.
It’s not actually melting (heat), using certain frequencies it is possible to “liquify” materials.
Been saying this for years. It's how they made the blocks for the pyramids as well.
Love the content and length of this video you posted! So interesting and hope to see more like this! I subscribed and hope to see more videos!!!!!
Thank you Travismosier4936!!! I appreciate you watching this video, your comment, and I'm grateful for your subscription! Thank you for watching!
@@TheVoyagerTV
Has anyone contemporary tried to soften stone ?
Ancient humans didn't melt stone the giants did who were offspring of the nephelim(fallen angels) who were in possession of a higher knowledge.
Evidence?
Very beautiful, Intriguing Images and articulation of Well put hypothesis 🫡🤌💯🥳🤗🙏🏾💚💚💚✊🏾🫂🕊🐦⬛🎉
Thank you sirtko, that means a lot! Thank you for watching and leaving a comment!
Truly an amazing video. I’ve never said this before but that’s maybe the best video I’ve seen. Everything you say makes so much sense. Thanks 🙏
Thank you MarkA-rz8mv, l greatly appreciated your comment and how you felt about this video!! It took a lot of time to gather this video content and a lot of time to put it all together. Thanks again!
I’m glad I found your channel!
Thank you very much, and I'm glad you did! Thank you for watching!!
For those saying a molded approach would use standard shapes, think about molding in-place. You just create a mold off of the prior pours. Much more versatile and the fitment is automatic.
@YellowLab-c4g... Right. That's an in-place mold.
When the evidence shows a decline in technology to a point were the method is lost, there is only one explanation: The technique did not start and evolved in that population but was given by another civilisation and the details gradually lost. A clear example of this devolution is the embalming method in Egypt.
the inca have always said the didnt build any of that the inca did stack small rough stones in some areas..
I've heard this claim made before and it could be true. During 00:23:20 in this video, you can see the difference between the ancient stonework and the Inca stonework off to the side. If you'd like to learn more about this mysterious cave, I created a video about it which I included right below.
ua-cam.com/video/O2JUiMbiOuA/v-deo.html
The fact a lot of less-technologically advanced modern cultures are next to useless when it comes to archaeology without more 'western' assistance has unfortunately had the knock on effect of a lot of western cultures assuming that every modern less-technologically advanced culture is useless and that they all need help and oversight. Many of them know exactly what they're doing and we don't listen to them because we've tarred them all with inferior comprehension brush. It's annoying how bad we are at contextualizing. So many places in the world do need someone else to do it because they're too useless and bone idle, in other cases though some places know what's going on but no one will listen to them.
The ancient Egyptians travelled to South America and made the structures we goggle at today.
Es tan difícil creer que fue creado por nativos americanos? Tuvo que ser un hombre blanco ?
Aun teniendo pruebas en las narices se rehusan a creer e inventan teorias rebuscadas
Have heard similar stories about ancient egypt.
I dont think they 'melted' stone, i think they built with a softened stone composite so that it could be formed and moulded, like clay
I think sometimes the stone was plugged into a advanced technology that melts the stones together like marshmallows in the oven fusing them together and the nubs that you see in some of the stones are where the device was unplugged leaving the nubs like the bottom of a glasss piece when you break it off when its still soft.
I believe religion stops us from knowing the truth about Earths history.
People would rather believe in the so called miracles of the bible than the truth. Truth is just too tedious, too boring, and too hard to find and understand.
You mean the same Bible that talks about the same antediluvian civilizations (including giants) that built these ancient structures? Also, other ancient texts talk about things like the vimana as well, the gods of Greek mythology are similar to the fallen angels of Enoch, etc.
Figuring out history will be like the ending of the Truman Show. "Now what?..."
People act as if finding out old stuff will unlock the secret to world peace.
Let's say they find Atlantis and prove the pyramids are 12,000 years old. What changes in 2024? Do you not have to go to work anymore? Will war end?
People put so much weight on finding out things that really don't matter, just so they can be right about something.
That's all it is. People want to say "see, I told you Atlantis was real!".... and then go to bed, and go to work tomorrow, and nothing changes.
It's just shit to argue about. "I'm too smart to believe what THEY tell us". Nobody who ever asserts crazy theories has to ever be responsible for them.
Making predictions and claims about things that will most likely never be figured out 100% is pretty safe to do. You never have to take criticism for being wrong.
@@Jv9569 Yes, people DO like a good campfire story, don't they?
thats a bit out of touch, dont you think? at one point it was the only story people had. at one point it was the way out of darkness. it got us to where we are ("you mean on youtube?"). it could also be argued that religion is a process of fact interpretation, a way of seeking truth. you might even say that its the human condition to wonder which cause us to not be able to just accept things, to disregard what might be truth and look for deeper meaning there-by creating the superstition of religious beliefs(like ken said). earths history and human history are different and yet inseparable. this is like the term "man-made" vs "natural"... you Are nature. maybe better words could be used... sustainable vs unsustainable, in harmony vs intrusive, respectful vs wasteful...
beyond that, the storys of ancient civs tell a very different tale under certain light, one which makes thing very clear to me that they werent talking of gods as we know them but they spoke of the very planets which bare the names of those gods. there were plasma phenomena in the ancient sky deep into space and surrounding the other plants in our solar system. the evidence comes from plasma science labs and world wide cave paintings, clay tablets, scrolls, tapestry/imagery/text and of course religious teachings from every age and era. all thru out history the story and warning of a great comet was preserved and prophesied to return... because it already happened once.
the stories took on a magic for sake of dramatization because its more important that the story stick and you remember the truth of it than to quibble over details. sure, it turned into "the finger of god" but the truth is a person could never imagine the horror of a 'nuke strike' that would be caused by a meteor let alone planets cascading space lightening and hurling material at each other. that shit mustve been absolutely WILD! no wonder they called them gods.
Maybe it wasn't melted. There is a clay in England that was discovered that had insect dropping in it that had turned the clay into stone. During regular daily excavation of the clay the clay stayed soft. When the crew/s stopped for winter to return in the spring they expected to resume work but they found that the clay had hardened into stone. The discovery was the now exposed clay had been infested by some form of insect and through the insect droppings the clay was hardened. Apparently the chemicals in the insect droppings were a catalyst that caused the clay to harden just like rock. I seems to me the article was posted about 8 years ago. I wouldn't know where to find it.
Like the Guano in this stone! Ammonia...
@@NextWorldVR If people of today's age can accidentally find a way to convert clay to stone... exactly. Scientists finally found the Romans built "better concrete than we normally use.Their secret ingredient was salt. Lime (a key in some concrete) gets warm with just the right amount of water. If the lime is heated enough to become what is called "quick lime" it can become reactive meaning if held under pressure it will get hot enough to rupture/explode. I recently found out that powdered magnesium, a health supplement, which is mixed with water for consumption, will get hot if it isn't mixed with enough water. There was a warning on the bottle of the powdered magnesium. Why can't today's builders make structures like the did in the past? Probably because we haven't learned what chemistry the ancients were using. Imagine pouring a stone house on top of a stone basement one bucket at a time. Except for the windows and doors it would be practically tornado or hurricane proof.
theres millions of tons of stone walls.. i dont think insects were resposible for this.. keep guesing..
@@harrywalker968 There were hundreds of tons that had to be moved yet as ;you say it is a guess. there were thousands of people who built those walls and if they knew the chemistry which their shape indicates was not natural. Iron and lime were in the walls as well showing man made construction indicating engineering not chiseling. A catalyst is a reasonable approach. yes that is another poke at a guess. What are a couple of yours?
@@dustinpotter8312 Engineering...that takes advanced geometric and mathematical skills. These people weren't using chisels and stone mallets to carve these things. That takes advanced knowledge. So who stole all that knowledge away and set us back into the stone age? We've been trying to crawl up the tech scale ever since and now we're at a point the military industrial complex is hiding knowledge from us yet again.
There is NO explaining how some of these VERY heavy stones were moved .
Could have used a old sort of 'Snatch Block' with several ropes and a small team of men. 1 man can move 100 ton stones with the right setup of Snatch Blocks and Ropes. Just sayin...
Problem with melting stone is that stone will never go back to the same composition like it was before. They may have had a way to soften stone.
Dude that is such an awesome video you blew my brain away with the music
I apologize. While editing the video, I had issues with some of the audio tracks. On some devices, it doesn't seem as loud.
Amazing the further you go back in time, you find advanced building methods, much of today's mathematics are from thousands of years ago, and complex languages were used. We had a great start then messed it up. One can only wonder how advanced human society would be by now if we listened.
21:20 that shot of the valley i was like… “i knew it. super 😊saiyens.”
They used thick red clay mined from acidic hot springs applied between the stones and left for some weeks, repeatedly lifted and refitted with incremental chiseling of the softened layer each time.
That entrance was old school fire! Love it
Thank you Danieldanton1129! That's the exact style I'm going for 😎
They used hydrofloric acid to melt the stones to the constacistancy of play dough, that's why the seams are so tight.
The same Floride used in tooth paste and city drinking water.
8:30 -ish same “scoop” marks as the unfinished obelisk in Egypt
Ha!! He eventually brought up my point about the obelisk in Aswan!
No he didn't @@AnthonyAnthony-tk4ye
Ancient civilizations had more advanced technologies than we do and our civilization makes the biggest mistake when we think we’re the top of the crème… Stone would change its color to a dark charcoal if melted and it would become porous and brittle. What the Ancients did is Use Sound to change the molecular arrangement of stone and mold it to any shape they wanted like when a high frequency note is played next to a crystal wine cup and if you slow down that FPS (frames per second), you can observe the crystal structure vibrate along and bend with the sound waves and if the frequency is amped, it will break. Sound properly ‘modulated’ has the power to restructure any material, Lift its weight by reducing it “mass weight” so it can be handle and transported and Sound can cut like a laser beam although is not visible to the naked eye just like a dog whistle that only a dog can hear but is imperceptible to the human ear. That’s how the pyramids got built and many other monoliths and construction wonders around the world and yes, the Sound Catalysts Tools were of Alien Origin.
🤣 🧢
24:56 Perhaps these walls once had a beautiful obsidian coating that is mostly worn away now? Or maybe it was applied in certain areas for a certain effect, weather cosmetic, or cosmic?
With the amount of ancient places throughout the region that have this obsidian coating on the stones, I believe so. If it did have a purpose besides it being aesthetic, it would have been very creative and useful.
@@TheVoyagerTV it’s pretty amazing that it’s there at all, and in so many places…what a strange idea! Unless it was easy to do, they probably wouldn’t have done it. It probably was a sight to see in original times.
@@Tom_Emody: I disagree with the part where you suggest that only if it is easy to wpuld they have done it.
Because these were done out of purpose, seeming really rather important to these people.
.....And time? What else did they have???? Generations of only time and caring labor.
Other than that though, I completely agree with ya! And if I misread what you meant then I am sorry.
@@shaneculkin7124feel free to share more idea’s whenever you want. I enjoy that you are a deep thinker.
or maby it was a big lego monster that made a popi
Who ever and how ever they did it , it must have been very very easy and quick and with very very high technology not permeative tools and techniques.
One can work on any small material given the years of time but to make what they have which we see all over the world is just impossible even with current technologies!
Excellent video. The enigma of the blue obsidian on the stones deserves some XRay fluoresce analysis. The blue color of the melted obsidian (a glass silicate) could arise from a copper silicate. Isn't that suggesting you they used some natural CuFeS2 ore during the thermal process? SiO2 (obsidian) is not so difficult to melt.
it is quite a step forward, but leaves mäny questions open. Would be interesting to find out how the "scoop marks" had been produced (as they can be found all over the world). This must have been done with a kind of "normed" tool (as they all look the same) and by smoothening the stone, so they could just remove it like butter. But we should be able to find some chemical traces on the surface of the stone. Until now I know nobody who came up with a plausible explication. You are the first - kind of
To me they look like scoop marks, yes.
They also look like where someone has pounded out a hollow, then moved along a bit and pounded out another; and another.
But why, how, who, and when I leave to (a) educated experts (b) opinionated guessers, or (c) religious fruitcakes (any brand).
Surely this chicken could be laid to roost simply enough? (Yes, I know ...economics, and the funding thereof.)
There's a very interesting 'throwaway' mention in the book "Exploration Fawcett" you might find relevant. (If you can find a copy, a wee bit out of print now, I'd say.) Good luck ...
If you can vibrate stone fast enough, it will melt. That’s how heat works. I’m guessing that long ago, vibration was well understood. ….Tom
@tomemody6685
Yep. Heat & speed both = moving molecules. As when they spin steel cylinders so they can turn the tops in to make gas bottles, like spinning clay to make pots. No "heat" on the steel needed, just a fast spin...
@@cisvaughan6937 it’s amazing to watch friction welding.
But how to melt stones efficiently?
@tomemody6685
Glad you find welding fascinating! I'm sometimes afraid I'm a nerdy welding bore!
...Maybe by using the same principle? Getting the molecules to momentarily separate, then let them re-fuse? You know how when you heat granite all the grains separate out, because the differently coloured ones expand at different rates, & you end up with something like a heap of demerara sugar on the floor. They won't stick back together. But other substances do ... Water after its been boiled, metal after its been forged, lava after its been heated and cooled (with or without resultant vitrification.)
Supposing something was used to oscillate the molecules of this stone till they began to separate, after sprinkling the surface with monatomic gold to make it weightless, the resulting loose stone~cloud could be pushed or blown through the air to where it's wanted then the monatomic gold layer scooped off & the stone let settle back into shape, in place.
This would also explain why the stones have a "poured" quality, as they'd have the opportunity to settle & sag into spaces, leaving no gaps.
(Although if old enough, non-crystalline stone will sag anyway, as does other unlikely materials --- see sags in glass after a few hundred years.)
There could of course be simpler metaphysical explanations, such as someone using telekinesis to move and meld the stone.
viper tv sumerian tablets. . they hold a cone, & have a bag for it.. was this a weapon,,or tool.. seeing there the aliens that made man,, . some dick, said, '' if they were so advanced, why did they use gigantic stone for everything''.. i said. ITS STILL THERE.... .
I have been totally thinking the same "melting" concept for years...no idea how they would have done this, but when thinking about all the "hows" melting was always at the top of my list. Of course my friends all think I'm nuts.
Nice work good video buddy
I think the ancients had a special cement formula mix with volcanic Ash or soil and used wood boxes to make mould to allow it to set. The tool marks are there to finish off some imperfections. Also the large bolders that seem to have perfect melted joints are just irregular cement blocks that is placed on site with no mold required. 😅
Its great to see quality work like this catch on. This video was very well made and narrated. A lot of thoughtful observations.
would have been better if he didnt claim this was his footage when, in fact, none of it is
@@chrisguess4344 a lot of it is his footage from his trips
@@chrisguess4344 All of the footage (videos and photographs) of these ancient sites are taken by me during my expeditions there.
I suspect that they used sound vibration. The note high C can break a crystal glass. Everything in the universe vibrates.
Is that the original 432 hrtz or the modern 440 hrtz 🤔
@@Acension43 No idea. Be careful with that note especially when you are walking on the sidewalk.
Excellent narration and editing.
Thank you tablescissors for watching and your comment, I appreciate it!
At 19:00
It looks like they POURED concrete into molds. Obviously, they had a high-strength recipe for concrete. It also looks like the "stones" that are not formed are simply left over slumps of this "concrete". This could also explain how they built pyramids, no more guessing how they "lifted" great sizes of stones into place, they simply poured into forms in place.
Big assertions require big proof. I'm from Missouri, show me how it was done.
Nothing was melted. Sand was placed on top of a stone, and another stone was placed on that sand. Then the top stone was slid back and forth until the sand carved both the top and bottom rocks into matching pieces. It required a lot of labor, which is easy if your civilization is founded on slave labor (which took on many forms in pre-Columbian South America).
@@BigGuyWhoKills Not so. You're saying a rough and immense stone was ground down to fit another stone under it, which would take decades to achieve per stone, with a material hard enough to wear down the top stone but not wear down the bottom stone. It won't work.
@@oldmanjoe6808 It is literally how surface plates were first made. The difference is that surface plates are made with 3 stones, repeatedly paired until a flat surface is achieved. The medium may need to be something other than sand, but quibbling about that is pedantry.
@@AdamHowellProvo All wrong. Mechanical properties can not be changed by human imagination... I have no need to "pedantry" about mechanical properties, just to rather correct the unlearned.
@@oldmanjoe6808 What mechanical properties do you claim I am wishing to alter?
I may be wrong, but here's a guy doing exactly what I described (albeit to a MUCH greater precision): ua-cam.com/video/iIQrVQs8luU/v-deo.htmlsi=sI68Fl5U6Yyca3mO&t=449
Also, you claim I said: "wear down the top stone but not wear down the bottom stone", when in reality I said pretty much the opposite: "Then the top stone was slid back and forth until the sand carved both the top and bottom rocks into matching pieces."
Plasmoids. A mixture of electricity sound etc. They knew the earth and the magnetics make sense. They did indeed melted stone or made it soft enough to be scooped/molded. Then when the electricity is turned off, it locks the shape in place. How they lifted? Same thing, using the electricity and the holes theyd use copper rods and a plate one positive one negative to essentially levitate the rocks. The legends notes this that people would shape the rocks then float them into place.
Its a fact that they knew something we dont.
What a vague and useless point.
Too much supposition especially in the drill holes. That vibration method doesn’t match the drill striations. Good info but too much “could it” in the layout.
Next take the proposed “dates”. Dating stone is pretty difficult and using other methods assumes the stones were placed/worked at that same time instead of being discovered or re-used.
Your theory is a fact... ancient people, used melted rocks and sands, and used molding patterns to form stone blocks. How they carried the stones and stock them on top of one another?
It was easy for ancient people and builders.
It was being performed by this man who posted in his YT channel how to move huge stone blocks..
I have some friends from Mexico and from what they told me the rock that you are looking at was formed in a molten state like concrete today but very thick and heavy,it was carved like woodcarving . The stuf in between was to make it harden up fast like salt in concret during the winter.
any plans, written records, drawings, of this.. no.. man did not build this. like the pyramids, if man built them as they say, they still wouldnt be finished..
Kind of makes sense. This is why bronze ties were used. They would be not be needed to hold magaton stone together but would help to hold clay-like bricks together while drying. Drying clay-like composites would have shrinkage and so open up joints.
You're close.
why would they make a false door? because its not false. if they knew how to do this then they knew how to do other things. if anyone was found doing this irl they would vanish. Our owners dont want us using such things. Gold is very dense it is non reactive chemically so it resists corrosion its rare its pretty it conducts electricity its dielectric (moves away from magnetic fields) i agree it must have some quality we are not aware of perhaps. great video btw you sound as good as preveen mohan and he has over a million subs. you sound great and have good insights.
Excellent and awesome vid and info! Thanks!
Today is the first time I have listened to your contents of your show and I'm very impressed the work you've done had to be tedious putting this video together I have the subscribed to your channel and look forward to more other videos thank you
Thank you PatrickcWinter! It meant a lot to me to read your comment and for you to subscribe to my channel. You're correct; it was tedious and took some time to complete this video. What took the most time was traveling to these places multiple times over the years to research them and to film them. I promise to keep creating more videos!
Sakrete! They filled cloth sacks with their geopolymer mix and braced the outside to form the shape they wanted. The glaze on the outside is easily attained today by using smooth plastic sacks. I would think the same glazing can be achieved by oiling/greasing the sacks smooth before pouring them with the geopolymer.
???... so,, where are the remains of the sacks,??,, this means, you fill the sack, place it, wait till it dries, remove it, take the sack off, then re place it,, fkn bs..
Jonathon you are correct, read in the bible the making of the tower of bable, the used mudbrick and they found something in the area, this something was oil, with wich they made the bricks waterproof, it became to be this glazing layer
Unlikely
Well done, I have always given this theory a good amount of weight and this is highly compelling. No pun intended.
Do you know how long it would take to build using these junk tools. They would still be working on them today.They had something else .
I do. I build ponds and stone walls just like this.
You do not know what you are talking about.
@@miller2675 I am a contractor and i build walls with hammers and other tools .But you do not do it with 100 or 1000 ton stones you can't and you don't know what you are talking about.
Clearly!💯
For sure, they wouldn't have had time to watch TV or play playstation
Thank you, professor
A very underrated channel.
Thank you Jester Green! I appreciate your comment!
Great video, lots of fantastic evidence.
So much we don’t know. Thanks.
Yeah i got beat for telling my teachers stuff like this when i was a kid - And now to see more people have finally been working on this publicly fkn love it
Because school isn’t meant to educate you. It was always designed to keep people in line.
You should have listened to your teachers
Dick farmers
@@davedoogan6650😂
As I am an artist , I have been working with cement, /concrete lately. Then I began to wonder….. what if monolithic stones were created by melting or making a more sophisticated concrete structures. I’m not buying the Ancient alien hypothesis., on megalithic stones.
, it’s an easy out for those that wish to cover up a faults historical storyline. I have wondered about many of the same details you have focused in the video. The human race has a far more technological history than those that have written history would want us to believe. I believe we are what was left of the beginning. Something catastrophic happened 13-10,000 years ago which drove us back into a “Stone Age” and much information was lost. If we were to know the truth we would question everything we in western society believe to be true. The Bible would be a book of fables, as would the Koran. Then those that have power would no longer have power over hearts and souls.
@zandanforth1326
Yeps
The premise that drystacked masonry structures were poured in molten stone is the most moronic horseshit clickbait on social media. It shows a lack of comprehension of the history of masonry, and also of the foundry processes that are proposed.
This was just one of many methods that these ancient builders used. What's so wrong with using one of these methods? The ancients didn't use just geopolymer. Check out my video Ancient Andean Cement for more information & evidence on this one method that was used in South America.
ua-cam.com/video/LacJ326yYws/v-deo.html
"Ancient humans melted stone." And then they crafted many thousands of individual forms with different dimensions to put the molten stone into for making building blocks. That's not very efficient. Why would they even do that?
They would do that because these construction methods were easy for them to handle. The materials used were not scarce, and the type of labor was widely known. These ancient sites were also created from either multiple construction methods or mainly one with only some other techniques. Puma Punku was mainly a geopolymer, while Sacsayhuaman was a mixture of multiple ancient stone construction methods. The part about melting is the outside finish they included a lot of these polygonal shaped blocks, which I explain in the video, along with including photographs from a digital field microscope.
@@TheVoyagerTVSo why is there no evidence at all for the forms constructed to shape the molten polymer blocks? And no local tradition for making such forms. A lot of textiles have survived, so why not the construction forms? Your theory lacks evidence.
The Best video I've ever seen on this mystery in my 62 yrs Great job
Thank you 2slowlola2b for watching and leaving your feedback! It was a lot of work & time filming this video content in South America
I think there should be a rule: if someone is whispering, they’re full of ….
Magnetic molds like in aluminum casting would work for iron rich material. Do the magnetic fields of these stone blocks align?
AL is only weakly magnetic. Try again.
I've always figured that the stones (world-wide) were melted into place. The consistently-found beveled edges should be a clue for us. Your idea that it was somewhat chemical in nature is not quite what I was thinking, but it's interesting at least.
Melted rock becomes glassy, like obsidian. How would they turn this back into natural stone?
@@pyotrberia9741 I don't believe this is necessarily true. Perhaps for very high temperatures it is, but I assume that if someone could melt large quantities of stone, they could control the temperature fairly carefully. All of this being said, I am hardly an expert on the behavior of various rocks at high temperatures.
@@AltonMoore If you can melt and then form rock into whatever shapes you want, why bother with all these odd shapes, and dont tell me its for earth quake prevention because the shapes are random. Also if they melted the rock, why are some of the sides rough. On top of this the amount of energy to melt stone into basically lava would be incredible. A lot of these locations do not have the energy source. Unless aliens of course, but why would freaking aliens travel the vastness of space just to come build some crappy stone structures. This is all just more bullshit theories, people just need to recognize that we don't know for sure how these things were built but instead our ancestors were very ingenious people.
Great video. Humans from early times have always demonstrated a great ability to learn, and demonstrate much prowess for engineering and creativity. We just have to discover their methods.
Thank you for your comment kermitefrog64 and I completely agree with you. They were smart and used very clever but primitive methods to create their stone structures from only what was available around them.
I subscribed ❤😌 keep it up
If you got the faces hot enough before setting the stone in place it would press into the proper shape and tolerance without needing precision cuts. 🤔 Those "H" blocks though, geopoolymer makes more sense.
wrong.. go try it, fkng around with 50t melted crap, have fun....
@@harrywalker968 Have a think about it before you naysay my friend ✌️ One simple solution would be to ignite thermite between the two surfaces before setting them. It was merely a thought experiment. 👍
stone isn't butter, they don't necessarily simply soften from heat.
some just get brittle.
¿and thermite in a time before metallurgy? good luck refining the bauxite into aluminum to begin with.
The obsidian is a nice find. What you found is what's left of what they originally looked it. Yes we're talking about hundreds of thousands of years of normal weathering, or thousands of years of INTENSE weathering. Take your pick. Either way, all these megaliths are heavily weathered. All of them. I also strongly believe that especially those scattered and irregular pieces that make no sense, are leftovers from VERY old structures that got destroyed. And anything you see that has indentations on it, be certain that something was fitted in it. Something that's long gone. Probably machinery.
This is the most reasonable proposal for the construction method. A solvent welding mortar, or a melted obsidian layer between stacked rocks. Along with decent masonry and or geopolymers, that would make sense.
Take forever to do but o.k.
@@rexyoshimoto4278 I mean, it would take a long time, but if you could do a layer every day or five it wouldn't be absurd.
so far the best documentary about those stones!
imho, I think they used maybe some lava heat source? then added components?
I like that he poses questions rather than getting crazy with it.
The narrators voice is so perfect! 🌟⭐ Is it a human or ai?
And the content is amazing 💛
I have a sewing instructions DVD narrated by a Chinese lady and the manner of speaking and accent is the same lol. So well pronounced and carefully spoken lol. Very entertaining 😁
It is 100% human by my own voice. Thank you for watching and listening tsetse!
These people had nothing but time and no modern distractions. They got skilled in their craft, handing down techniques to their kids, and put in the time and labor.
Ok this is something I have been working on. Have you guys seen the man who melts all kind of things rocks and metals using the rear screen from an old rear projector tv. He made a frame and used to focus sunlight, like all of us did with a magnifying glass when we were children. This set a light bulb moment, obviously they didn’t have rear projector tv but they did have crystals and crystals were something they had access to and used.
I have been able to melt rock using crystal and the sun. I am not able to cut anything accurately but it works.
If this interests anyone let me know and I can give you more information.
Pls accept my English it’s not my first language.
Well done! In a very crowded field, most enjoyable video, best presentation on this subject .
Thank you crashingtiger. I appreciate you watching my content that I filmed and created, along with your comment!
0:57 Hey whats up guys, Scarce here
Very cool! Just what i was asking for! Now comes the difficult part. What now? I wont stop wondering.