@@yawlusergroup I meant to commend the YAWL implementation, because when you say the pattern is not directly supported in YAWL, I assume a complex workaround is needed.
I'm glad that you say that. In fact I wasn't quite so sure if this implementation is the best you can get. This pattern was much harder than most of the others.
simple and effective!
Thanks, but are you referring to the pattern itself or the BPMN implementation?
@@yawlusergroup I meant to commend the YAWL implementation, because when you say the pattern is not directly supported in YAWL, I assume a complex workaround is needed.
I'm glad that you say that. In fact I wasn't quite so sure if this implementation is the best you can get. This pattern was much harder than most of the others.