the problem with goal oriented intelligence is that eventually they are achieved. how long can you sit on a mountain top? what good is intelligence after you have succeeded in the ultimate ambition? perhaps this is the answer to the fermi paradox... high intelligence reaches a limit where it realizes all of this and ceases to create new goals.
But what if we've come to have the goals that we hold through a entirely calculable process with a fixed formula . Would that not mean then that even our pursuit of any goal is just another occurence in this cosmic automata ?
Wolfram talks about computational irreducability. In his view what happens in the world is a calculation but the most efficient way to calculate the result is by the world/universe to perform the calculation. We may know the world formula but the fastest way to know that something happens is that it happens.
does he know how to upload consciousness to a computer or inside a virtual environment ? .I think people that are involved into AI must try to create artificial conscious intelligence and find methods to verify that the program has genuine emotional responses they must input some sensors that will make the system react in ways that will be instinctive like fear fight or flight responses it is just an opinion I have on how to test this
@@preenan5123 if AI has real emotions it will be self aware every form of intelligent life that has emotions especially fear and anger are certain to have self awareness .If we could code emotions into AI and somehow trigger a genuine potent emotional response then it will be very possible that the machine is conscious .The AI must have a robot body with sense of touch and pain that’s how the responses can be triggered
@@kokomanation In accordance with Complexity Theory, A direct upload of a particular consciousness to a computer is irriducible...it can't be done because the brain is a complicated system that requires the years that made it into what it is today to be part of that computation. However one can make a computer itself conscious through complexity theory by just basic understanding of how simple systems become complex ones using very basic rules that define relationships between elementary elements, and then let this simple rule go through a computation that could take maybe as long as regular ol'natural brains grow. Neural Networking is the start of this really...but the problem is trying to control it...it is of my opinion, that we can not control it. Chaos theory shows us we can't predict it so what makes us believe we can control it let alone even predict what it's behaviors will be?
i believe the universe is completely reducible. thats the only thing that logically makes sense and supports wolframs theories. a non reducible universe would contain truly random properties, but the laws of the universe cannot contain randomness?
All of physics says this, not just you. Everything exists in a configuration where energy is minimized (assuming allowed by qm), hence maximum efficiency. Metastable configurations exist but are only temporary and will invariably return to their lowest energy configuration.
BAD TITLE given his ideas on cellular automata and computational irreducibility ... and what he states here ... there is a VAST amount of stuff that is not automatable.
Goal are important, and achieving them are important not the means, if reaching the goal can be automated then why not? This video makes sense compared with other fear-mongering video about AI, which are there in the public domain. Please see the full picture from 35K feet above, not from where they are present. Use critical thinking. We can't solve a problem with the same level of thinking we used when we created them.
the background music is noise and it's irritating.
the backround music is so annoying!
Music is too distracting. Literally unwatchable.
DeDodgingEse
Please, can you bring me this kind of music in that video ?
the problem with goal oriented intelligence is that eventually they are achieved. how long can you sit on a mountain top? what good is intelligence after you have succeeded in the ultimate ambition? perhaps this is the answer to the fermi paradox... high intelligence reaches a limit where it realizes all of this and ceases to create new goals.
You have a limited imagination.
This person invented WolframAlpha
That Background Music 🎶
But what if we've come to have the goals that we hold through a entirely calculable process with a fixed formula . Would that not mean then that even our pursuit of any goal is just another occurence in this cosmic automata ?
he says the environment can change your goals. your circumstances. Its not so much as the formula but executing the formula
Wolfram talks about computational irreducability. In his view what happens in the world is a calculation but the most efficient way to calculate the result is by the world/universe to perform the calculation. We may know the world formula but the fastest way to know that something happens is that it happens.
soo.... goals are un-automatable... is creativity a goal?
saltyturkey . I'd say its more of a necessary applied method for reaching a goal. Ya?
... Stable diffusion, dalle 2, midjourney etc.
does he know how to upload consciousness to a computer or inside a virtual environment ? .I think people that are involved into AI must try to create artificial conscious intelligence and find methods to verify that the program has genuine emotional responses they must input some sensors that will make the system react in ways that will be instinctive like fear fight or flight responses it is just an opinion I have on how to test this
Say it in different words
@@preenan5123 if AI has real emotions it will be self aware every form of intelligent life that has emotions especially fear and anger are certain to have self awareness .If we could code emotions into AI and somehow trigger a genuine potent emotional response then it will be very possible that the machine is conscious .The AI must have a robot body with sense of touch and pain that’s how the responses can be triggered
@@kokomanation In accordance with Complexity Theory, A direct upload of a particular consciousness to a computer is irriducible...it can't be done because the brain is a complicated system that requires the years that made it into what it is today to be part of that computation.
However one can make a computer itself conscious through complexity theory by just basic understanding of how simple systems become complex ones using very basic rules that define relationships between elementary elements, and then let this simple rule go through a computation that could take maybe as long as regular ol'natural brains grow.
Neural Networking is the start of this really...but the problem is trying to control it...it is of my opinion, that we can not control it. Chaos theory shows us we can't predict it so what makes us believe we can control it let alone even predict what it's behaviors will be?
i believe the universe is completely reducible. thats the only thing that logically makes sense and supports wolframs theories. a non reducible universe would contain truly random properties, but the laws of the universe cannot contain randomness?
But what about the goal of making humans a multiplanetary?
Yes - the creative ability of humans is why we exist. We were made in Gods image
So is he saying that the most efficient possible simulation of reality is reality itself? I haven't heard anyone else say this besides me :D
All of physics says this, not just you. Everything exists in a configuration where energy is minimized (assuming allowed by qm), hence maximum efficiency. Metastable configurations exist but are only temporary and will invariably return to their lowest energy configuration.
that's right
Asimov explicitly says this in one of the Foundation novels, while it is subtext in the earlier ones.
@@lightninghell4 thermal death has not come yet, open your eyes
Why is he being interviewed in a club on a Friday night?
Wait, playing video games all day isn't some sort of existential ideal ? Ok boomer.
BAD TITLE
given his ideas on cellular automata and computational irreducibility ... and what he states here ... there is a VAST amount of stuff that is not automatable.
Robots aren't irrational enough to want to conquer and exterminate us
Desire to conquer has nothing to fo with irrationality
@@goyonman9655 because they need all that oxygen and water and can't just go into space to get away from us
glaringly lacking: creativity, insights, curiosity, disruptive action.
Tell me you don't know anything about this person without telling me ...
Amazing
Goal are important, and achieving them are important not the means, if reaching the goal can be automated then why not? This video makes sense compared with other fear-mongering video about AI, which are there in the public domain.
Please see the full picture from 35K feet above, not from where they are present. Use critical thinking. We can't solve a problem with the same level of thinking we used when we created them.
You just know he’s British by looking at his teeth
he's jewish
DarkestOne7 British jew
The background music is horrible. Daily Dot - blocked...
This music is a terrible decision I hope whoever did it is fired by now