Angular momentum and cross product

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 13 січ 2025

КОМЕНТАРІ • 20

  • @CountGrishnakh
    @CountGrishnakh Рік тому

    Thank you! Might I add, your voice is very calming!

  • @hannakennedy3720
    @hannakennedy3720 6 років тому +6

    I just found your videos, they are amzing and I wish I found your youtube page sooner!

    • @yoprofmatt
      @yoprofmatt  6 років тому +3

      Thanks. Keep up with the physics!
      Cheers,
      Dr. A

  • @Khgxcji
    @Khgxcji 6 років тому +5

    This is very helpful. Thanks Dr.Anderson. May Allah bless you.

    • @yoprofmatt
      @yoprofmatt  6 років тому

      Thanks! Keep up with the physics.
      Cheers,
      Dr. A

  • @manuboker1
    @manuboker1 Рік тому

    The best Physics teacher in the World !!! 😎

  • @carultch
    @carultch 2 роки тому

    One explanation I've heard for why it is called L, is that it commonly is based on two perpendicular vectors (r and p), and L looks like two perpendicular vectors. One of the rare examples where the appearance instead of pronunciation, determines our letter choice. I've also seen H for Hamilton, when the writer wants to keep L available to stand for something else.

  • @jamesranawadia
    @jamesranawadia 4 роки тому +3

    holy shit, Ryan reynolds

    • @yoprofmatt
      @yoprofmatt  4 роки тому +3

      Khuzaim Ranawadia,
      Flattering, although a bit of a stretch.
      Thanks for the comment, and keep up with the physics!
      You might also like my new website: www.universityphysics.education
      Cheers,
      Deadpool

  • @NomanNazir-c3o
    @NomanNazir-c3o 4 місяці тому

    ❤❤

  • @Anteater23
    @Anteater23 6 років тому +2

    I don't get how L can be the cross product of these two vectors. Because the angular momentum will then be perpendicular to the linear momentum of the particle at a given time.

    • @carultch
      @carultch 2 роки тому

      It's a convention. There is no physical reason it has to be in that direction, just that we had to assign a direction, and directing it along the axis of rotation toward the "north pole" of rotation is the convention we agreed upon.
      The reason the angular quantities get a direction assigned along the axis of rotation, rather than a direction in the plane of rotation, is that it reduces the number of options to arbitrarily choose from to reduce 360 degrees worth of options, to just two options. We could've just as easily used a left-handed convention for angular quantities and defined the direction along the axis toward the "south pole" of rotation, but we opted for the north pole and a right-handed convention.

  • @PrabhjotSingh-kj8ey
    @PrabhjotSingh-kj8ey 2 роки тому

    that was very helpful, Thank You

  • @Dewon537
    @Dewon537 8 місяців тому

    Thank you sir

  • @stevedaguy9639
    @stevedaguy9639 4 роки тому +1

    Are you writing all of that mirrored????

    • @yoprofmatt
      @yoprofmatt  4 роки тому

      Steve,
      Not writing backwards (I'm not that talented). The board is called Learning Glass. You can check it out at www.learning.glass
      Cheers,
      Dr. A

  • @luislopez3198
    @luislopez3198 7 років тому

    i would like to set up an appointment for your office hours.

    • @yoprofmatt
      @yoprofmatt  7 років тому

      Come to San Diego and we'll work it out.
      Cheers,
      Dr. A

  • @ahmadsaeed4323
    @ahmadsaeed4323 8 років тому

    +Matt Anderson please do a video based on The equations of motions,love your work by the way

    • @yoprofmatt
      @yoprofmatt  8 років тому +1

      +ahmad saeed
      Thanks, this might help: ua-cam.com/video/CDM3dJTqTWc/v-deo.html
      Cheers, Dr. A