Because it was the shallowest part of the river crossing. The water was clear and you could see it from the riverbank. Otherwise we usually wade through, if the depth is unclear and the crossing appears to be deep. Some of them e.g. in Estonia turned out to be extremely deep in the centre. So it's definitely recommendable to check, before playing captain submarine 😉
@@RTWriders That was to be a short conversation between two people. A joke about the permanent wheelspin. 😉 I had a giggle thinking about whether the front and rear wheels would have different service intervals when the front did so significantly fewer kilometres than the rear.
Looks so much fun 👏😍
It was, haha 😃🤣
Really nice trails! Good work! 👍
Thanks
Missed booth best TET branches in Latvia :) I suppose excuse to go back :) In Latvia its either dry and easy or wet and muddy, you got second part.
Latvia was really cool, we definitely want to go back 😃 what parts are the best?
Mud roads and you is a good combination 😉
Well, it's fun as long as you don't have to sleep in a tent completely soaked the whole night.
...und noch einen weils echt nice war
Danke dir 🤗😃😉
I must admit that I prefer boring gravel roads instead of mud baths :)
Come on - nothing is better than a proper mud bath. It's really good for your skin ;-)
Cheers from Indonesia 🇮🇩 😍😍
Thank you! Cheers in return from Argentina!
Yep, mud is always a challenge. 🤙
Mud and deep soft sand is always challenging with that much luggage. It's still fun, if one's not in a hurry.
Why did you choose such a path for the river crossing (9:30)? Any tips for crossing such barriers?
Because it was the shallowest part of the river crossing. The water was clear and you could see it from the riverbank. Otherwise we usually wade through, if the depth is unclear and the crossing appears to be deep. Some of them e.g. in Estonia turned out to be extremely deep in the centre. So it's definitely recommendable to check, before playing captain submarine 😉
"How many kilometres did you go in Latvia?" "Do you mean the front or the rear wheel?"
Should have been around 750km. Sorry - but we don't understand your second question.
@@RTWriders That was to be a short conversation between two people. A joke about the permanent wheelspin. 😉 I had a giggle thinking about whether the front and rear wheels would have different service intervals when the front did so significantly fewer kilometres than the rear.
@@zweispurmopped Ah ok, we got it now 🙂Yeah, we got quite some rear wheel spinning there.
Einen für den Algorithmus
🤣🤗🤗 Danke