फ्री वैदिक लाइब्रेरी : www.veducation.world/library Veducation App Free : play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.veducation&pcampaignid=web_share All Veducation Books : www.veducation.world/store/books या फिर Amazon से पाइए👇🏼 B.O.S.S Hindi : amzn.to/3zCsgQi B.O.S.S Eng : amzn.to/3sz9kiP Vedic Dincharya : amzn.to/40J9gLG ••• 0:00 शास्त्र बदल क्यों गए? 0:28 शास्त्र कभी नहीं बदले, न कभी बदलेंगे 0:49 युगधर्म क्या होते है? 1:10 त्रेतायुग में यज्ञ कैसे होते थे? 1:31 सोने के 6 प्रकार 3:13 कौन एक से अधिक पत्नियाँ रख सकता है? 4:30 स्त्री को क्या चाहिए होता है? 5:47 पुरुष का कर्तव्य क्या है? 6:38 मॉडर्न पुरुष अधिक विवाह क्यों नहीं कर सकते? 7:10 कृष्ण भगवान ने अपनी बहन का विवाह ऐसे करवाया था 7:55 विवाह में Sex प्राथमिक नहीं है 10:00 भविष्यमें होगा ही 10:52 यदि अधिक विवाह नहीं लाए तो क्या होगा? 11:37 संस्कारी स्त्रियों के साथ अन्याय न हो 12:02 विवाह कब नहीं करना चाहिए? 12:50 परिवार के मोक्ष की ज़िम्मेदारी किसकी? 13:46 Equality जैसी कोई चीज़ नहीं होती 15:18 शास्त्र को सुगरकोट न करें 15:52 नया नज़रिया मिला 🙏🏻
prabhuji apki library mein books ke pages ka ZOOM IN kar ne ka option available kar do mere Grandfather ko book padhne mein dikkat aa rahi hai please Hare Krishna
Shree ram ko bhul gaye unhone 1 hi vivah Kiya hai Unke bhaiyo ko bhul gaye aap dashrath ji ka name lo per shree ram ne to nahi Kiya unka udaharn bhi lelete
MATLAB Aapke anusar arar ek admi monthly jyada kamarahahae or physically strong hae Woh ek patni rahetahae BHI dusri sadi karsakte yehi hae na . Aaj kal koi BHI ledki ek purush ko nehin sadi karegi jiska pehele se ek patni hae Toh yeah bakbazi mat karo
@@samirasamira1902didi mtlb samji Vedic yug mein sakht mana tha polygamy lekin baad mein jab hamare dharm ko budhist muslimon dwara khatam kar Diya gaya tha, kyunki baaki panth kaafi choot dete the aadmi ko jese polygamy wagarah, isliye hamare dharm guruon ne dharm ka patan rokne ke liye ye sab jor diya, ab yeh hamari jimmedari hai ki hum yeh sab khatam Karen jese is bhai ne bola hai 😊
वंदे मातरम् प्रभु जी! मैं संजय! उत्तराखण्ड के अल्मोड़ा जनपद से हूं, मुझे यूट्यूब से आपके विषय में जानकारी प्राप्त हुई, आपको राष्ट्र हित और जन कल्याण हेतु धर्म का कार्य करता देख अत्यंत प्रसन्नता होती हैं, प्रभू जी, मुझे भी ब्रह्मचर्य पालन कर अपना जीवन देश और अपने माता पिता को समर्पित करना है लेकिन मुझे कहीं इस तरह का माहौल नही मिल पा रहा है अतः मेरा आपसे विनम्र निवेदन है कि आप मुझे भी अपने प्रोजेक्ट गोल्डन बर्ड में सेवा का मौका प्रदान करें ।
bandhu pehle poori ramayan padhlo vaise to sab prabhu ki leela hi hoti hai aur vo leela unhone us samay ki praja to santusht krne k liye ki thi as he is a king and as a king has the formost duty to satisfy the commoners with their mindset aur unhe to poorna vishvaas tha maata sita ki pavitrata pe lekin unhone isliye kiya taki tum jaise jhandu aur baaki log unpe ungli na utha sake aur jab pareeksha mata ne di to prabhu ne bhi di thi as laxinarayan is not a man and woman like us vo anant kaal se ek hai jab maata ko praja ke kaaran vanvaas jaana pada tab prabhu ko bhi bahut kasht tha so please dont ever dare to blame Lord rama for his decisions kyunki hum aur tum bahut tuccha hai aur buddhiheen hai unke samaksh jo unki leelayein samajh sake
This man is a revolution (mahapurush hai yeh vyakti.. Bhagwan inko lambi umar de aur hamesha kush rakhe duniya ko roshni ki taraf leke jaane ke liye shukriya prabhu ji)
सत्य वच् न , ❤क्या कहे , आप धन्य हो, बात जरा कटू हैं, लेकिन यह एकदम सत्य है. जो purushottama h, उन्हें एक् se jyada patniya karne ka purna adhikar h. Wo purush, jo janata ho, स्त्री को क्या चाहिये, सुरक्षा हो, अन्न, वस्त्र, निवारा हो, और पती का प्रेम हो, फ़िर पती और कितनी पत्नीया रखे, इस् से कोई problem नही
ky gandugiri chal rhi hai , me inko follow krta tha aaj tak?? dharm k naam pe kuch bhe?? me apne bachi ka shadi kisi normal middle class purush se krwana chhahunga jo usse pyer kare wo khush reh saki naaki 10 wife wale ambani se jo unko sirf provide kr sake..
Prabhu can u make a book stating that how sanatana Dharma is not a mythology. Please help the upcoming youth, as many people depend on your books and value them. Hare Krishna.
No need..... Hazaro proofs aur videos already hain par jisko interest ni hai ya jisko maannaa nahi hai vo ni maanega isliye faltu me pareshaan mat karo Prabhu Ji ko
Firstly, we can't prove anything other than mahabharat because most recent ramayan some crore years ago. Mahabharat places are still found like ahicchatra and kans Kila which was taken over by kushan empire.
Agressive hokar Jai ShreeRam bolke jo log nahi kar pate aap bo dhirshtir rahkar Jai ShreeRam bolke kar dete ho.. Yahi apke khasiyat hai. Apka bhut bhut dhanyavaad.. 🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻 Jai ShreeRam.. 🙏🏻
Ek pati apne ek patni ko achhe se pyar,security samman de shakta hai ek se jada honge to yea kabhi nehi ho payega pratically soche to aur ahi praman Ramayan me Ram chandra ne diya tha unke pita k 3 patni k baja se hi unko vanbas me jana pada tha,Ram ji wohi neeti tod ek adarsh vivah ka example diya tha isiliye Ram chandra ko hi purushottom Ram kaha jata hai jo har yug k liye adarsh hai jinhe har insan ko follow karna chahiye.
After watching the video i can agree to some points but i also disagree to many. First, in ancient vedic period the 4 ashrams were followed. You may get marry or you may not get married its completely your choice. The 4 ashramas are there. Both men and women were allowed to have their choices because we find many brahmacharis as examples. Now, i completely disagree that their was any hierarchy in Dharma. Everyone had to do their part as a human being to attain God be it man or women. There was mention of many Vidushis who were equally given right to education and read vedas to pursue God. I would not say that there is any hierarchy among man and woman. Both are equally important. That's why the wife is called the ardhanagini. We worship Ardhanarishwar. Shiv and Shakti. And we say that Shiv and Shakti cannot exist without each other. We worship Devi personified as woman. But of course there is division of responsibilities for both. Although souls donot have any gender,The body you are born with is tied with some responsibilities and you can't escape it. We see Devi Maa fulfilling every responsibility as a wife and mother but still perform her other duty as the protector by killing the demons. The grihasta ashram is associated with marriage only for the sole cause of creating the next generation. To form a better environment for the next generation. Our Dharma don't encourage polygamy. Secondly, polygamy was allowed in that period because the male was capable of taking the responsibility equally and its also because of many societal and political reasons. That doesn't mean it is right. We can see Ram had only one wife while Krishna had many. But both are avatars, purushottam. Ram never encountered any circumstances where he had to marry anyone else. He promised mata sita. While Krishna face many circumstances where he had to marry so many wives. But he was equally available to each of them at the same time. He took many forms and was there with each of his wives at the same time as per Bhagwat puran.Although it seems like polygamy but it was monogamy since bhagwan Krishna knew the importance of being one on one in marriage. Again if we see those 16108 wives are the form of the same Mata Lakshmi. So where is the polygamy? So, bhagwan Ram and Bhagwan Krishna are out of question. Many kings marry for many reasons. But one thing thing is very important to know that those kings are equally available and responsible for all their wives. Its not out of lust but its out of duties. However, this is kalyug, many kings in the history do have many wives, they do took their responsibilities seriously but i doubt that their personal lives were peaceful. Because in Kalyug, neither the male nor the females have the same qualities as the people of other yug. So, its best to have monogamy in kalyug to have a peaceful and developed family life.
You are right...I too was not able to accept this didactic system of hierarchy as he claims are in shahtras.... I am happy to see your stand point...and I totally agree 💯 👍
प्रभू आपके १०८००० गुरुकुल के लिये एक छोटासा दक्षिणा. आपको बताना चाहुंगा की मे महाराष्ट्र राज्य के एक छोटेसे गाव से हू. हमारे गाव के मेरे कूछ युवा मित्र ऑर मे मिलकर निधी जमा करते हे, ऑर छत्रपती शिवाजी महाराज के नाम से मोहीम चलाते हे जिसमे हम गरीब पारिस्थिती वाले लोगोंकी मदत करते हे, वृध्दाश्रम, रुग्णालयो मे अन्नदान करते हे. प्रभू अभी सिर्फ शुरुवात की हे, घर से इतना सहकार्य नही मिलता क्यो की आयु कम है फिलाल ११ वी मेही हू. लेकीन मेरा मानना हे की पढाई भी करेंगे, ऑर हरी नाम भी लेंगे ! || हरी बोल... जय श्री कृष्ण || *जय शिवराय जय भवानी 🚩🚩🚩
Are isne bohot mahino se bol rakha tab se isne ek bhi Naya gurukul nahi banaya hai 12 pe hi iska number atka hai kab ka aur mujhe to nahi lagta ki ye pure 108000 gurukul bana paega is speed se Kam Kiya to
Har yug k niyam alag hote hain, like Satyug- dhyan, Treta- yagya, Dwapar- Vigrah Pujan & Kalyug- Naam jap🙏 Wese hi pehle k yugo kliye possible tha 1 se adhik vivah krke sabko saman roop se sath leker chalna... Is Kalyug me to 1 wife k sath b jiwan thik se ni chlta logo ka, bhagwat sewa bhakti, suraksha etc to dur k baat hai... To 1 se zyada wife rakhenge to har ghar kurukshetra ka maidan ban jayega🙆 jo b thodi bahut shanti hai kuch families me wo b bhang ho jayegi😅 So better hai k SiyaRam ji k jese 1 pati, 1 patni shanti se rahein...& Apne kartavyo ka sahi se palan krte hue Prabhu k Shri charno k dhyan k sath bhakti sewa karne k koshish karein😌🙏
उन्होंने यह कैसे सोच लिया कि चार-पांच शादियां होंगी तो परिवार सुखी रहेगा और कोई भेदभाव नहीं होगा, अन्यथा राम स्वयं एकविवाहित रहने का निर्णय नहीं लेते।राजा दशरथ सक्षम थे, लेकिन परिवारों में आंतरिक भेदभाव , उनके परिवार में राजनीतिक कलह थी, कृष्ण की कई शादियों के बावजूद असमानता थी, उनके बेटे और बेटियां उनकी अवज्ञा करती थीं, उनकी पत्नियाँ उनकी अवज्ञा करती थीं, इसलिए निर्णय की आवश्यकता वहां थी जहां दोनों समान हों।
Ram is regarded as Maryada Purushottam, the most ideal man. His reign is called Ram-Rajya, an ideal statehood and administration. Ram remained loyal to only one wife, Sita, in her presence or absence. We follow his ideals. In most of the civilised societies, polygamy is prohibited. We also forbid it on grounds of morality, equality, legality, stability, liberty. Leave religion for a second, would you be happy if your father had multiple wifes? Would your mother be happy? Yeah some people back then used to marry multiple wife, but thats not ideal; Ideal is what Shree Rama does, rest are just hearsay.
@@Veducation jai jai narayan sir Lekin aapki iss tark se ki saksham purush k adhik patniya rakhni chahiye, toh shree rama ji ne adhik patniya kyu nhi rakhi? Wo toh saksham the, wo toh pati k liye poore sansaar mei sabs uttam the, toh sirf ma sita ko hi kyi chuna? Kya shree rama ji ko nhi pata tha aapke tark k bare mei? Aur kya unhone anek vivah na karne k karan ek uttam kaam karne mei vifal hue? Jai Narayan 🙏
@@VeducationGood luck with fulfilling your fantasy of marrying multiple girls, let's see which girl marries u lol. No decent family will give their girl to a guy who wants to have multiple wives.
@@Walkie-Talkie-zz9ck shree ram ne adhik patniya krsna roop me rkhi tou hai bhai, ab tu kya khna chahra hai ki bhagwat gita bolne vale param bhagwaan shri krsna ko dharma ka gyan nhi tou shri ram and shri krsna dono ek hi hai and dono hi shi hai kutark krne vala topic nhi hai ye, sanatan has multiple paths, jisme ek path hai ki agr purush apni ek patni se bhot prem krta hai tou vo use vada krta hai ki ham dusri patni nhi layenge its vrata of husband(maryada purshottam) its about sweet lovely relationship between couples( its ideal for normal mens) , secondly shri ram param bhagwaan the unhe pta tha aage sita tyag hoga tou agr shri ram ki anek patniya hoti tou sb khte ki ram tou ek bhogi vyakti tha jisne sita ko tyag diya kyunki uske paas aaur striyo ki kami nhi thi bhai ek advice hai meri trf se ya tou tu sanatani ho jaa ya fir so called western ho jaa ye beech ka path mt le jab shastra agya kr rhe hai hai saksham purusho( kings,rishis,wealthy peoples) ko anek vivah ke liye tou zayada dimaag mt chla, shri krsna ne bhi kiya na vo glt tha kya nhi na, shri ram also has madhurya rasa leela in his dham, secondly agr kaliyuga is worst yuga agr yha koi cheez promote ho rhi voo automatically wrong hai phle multiple wives rkhte the and ab rkhne ka dam nhi tou issi se pta lgta hai phle ke log hi shi the because satyuga,treta,dwapar people are more intelligent and less lusty than today if still tehy are keeping multiple wives then even logically they are right
बहुत अच्छे से आपने इस बात को समझाया और मैं पूरी तरह सहमत भी हूं किंतु जैसा अपने कहा युग बदलते है तो कुछ पद्धतियां भी बदलती हैं इसलिए शायद आज के परिप्रेक्ष्य में बहु विवाह को उचित नहीं माना जा रहा
.….vedo me ek se adhik patni rakhne Ka virodh💛 🛑*ऋग्वेद के मंत्र 10.105.8 के अनुसार एक से अधिक पत्नियों की मौजूदगी से अनेक सांसारिक आपदाओं का जन्म होता है। 💚*ऋग्वेद १०.१०१.११ कहता है:- दो पत्नियों वाला व्यक्ति उसी प्रकार दोनों तरफ से दबाया हुआ विलाप करता है, जैसे रथ हांकते समय उस के अरों से दोनों ओर जकड़ा हुआ घोड़ा हिनहिनाता है। 💜*ऋग्वेद १०.१०१.११ के अनुसार दो पत्नियां जीवन को निरुदेश्य बना देती हैं। 💓*इसी तरह अथर्ववेद ३.१८.२ में प्रार्थना है कि 'कोई भी स्त्री सह-पत्नी के भय का कभी सामना न करे। 🧡*अथर्ववेद मंत्र ७.३६.१ के अनुसार पति-पत्नी परस्पर कामना करते हैं- .मुझ को ह्रदय में स्थान दो, जिस से हम दोनों का मन भी सदा साथ रहे।' 💜*अथर्ववेद ७.३८.४ में पत्नी की यह हार्दिक अभिलाषा व्यक्त की गई है कि 'तुम केवल मेरे हो अन्य स्त्रियों की चर्चा भी न करो।' 💚अथर्ववेद के एक अन्य मंत्र ३.३०.२ तथा १४.२.६४ में पति और पत्नी को परस्पर समर्पित तथा एकनिष्ठ रहने की हिदायत दी गई है। 💙*ऋग्वेद के तीनों मंत्र १.१२४.७, ४.३.२ तथा १०.७१.४ वर्णित करते हैं:- .जाया पत्य उशासी सुवासा' अर्थात विद्या विद्वानों के पास उसी प्रकार आती है जैसे एक समर्पित हर्षदायिनी पत्नी सिर्फ अपने पति को ही प्राप्त होती है।' 'जाया' तथा ‘पत्य’ क्रमशः पत्नी तथा पति का अर्थ रखते हैं। ⬇️*ऋग्वेद मंत्र संख्या १.३.३ में परमात्मा को पवित्र और उच्च आचरण वाली समर्पित पत्नी की उपमा दी गई है, जिसमें एक पत्नीत्व का आदर्श भी अन्तर्निहित है। 💤*ऋग्वेद मंत्र संख्या १०.१४९.४ में भगवन और भक्त के मध्य प्रेम की तुलना समार्पित पत्नी और पति के प्रेम से करता है। 🧠*ऋग्वेद मंत्र संख्या १०.८५.२० में वधू के लिए निर्देश है कि वह अपने पति के लिए सुख की वृद्धि करे। 🖤*ऋग्वेद मंत्र संख्या १०.८५.२३ में पत्नी और पति को सदैव आत्म-संयम के पालन की शिक्षा दी गई है। विवाह से संबंधित सभी मंत्र द्विवचन सूचक शब्द दंपत्ति को संबोधित करते हैं, जो एक ही पत्नी और एक ही पति के रिश्ते को व्यक्त करता है। जिस के कुछ उदाहरण ऋग्वेद १०.८५.२४, १०.८५.४२ तथा १०.८५.४७ में मिल जाएंगे। अथर्ववेद के लगभग सम्पूर्ण १४वें कांड में विवाह विषयक वर्णन में इसका उपयोग हुआ है। प्रायः मंत्रों में जीवन पर्यंत एकनिष्ठ रहने के संबंध में प्रार्थना की गई है।
Capable men deserve capable women like Durga and Shiva ... srishti me dono k hona jaruri hai ..ha stree shararik roop se thodi weak hogi pr duniya me shararik roop se mazboot purush unhi se aate hai ...
Yes, polygamy is completely a legit thing as per Vedas, there are so many examples, Dasharath maharaj, Janak maharaj, Arjun, Bheem etc., and also some of the great saints like Gora kumbhar, Annamalai had more than one wife. 🚩🙏
Draupadi ka example kyu nahi Diya fir yaha pe, wo bhi bhagvan Krishna ne valid bataya tha to ladkiya bhi zyada pati rakhe? Dharma sirf shadi karne ka naam he, ek se zyada shadi karke hi dharm ka palan hota he, kuch bhi concept leke bas bol do
@@nisha77788nahi. Mata druapadi ke Panch pati ki katha puri padhiye. Usme akshep ka nivaran devo ne swayam akar kiya hai. Polyandry keval kuch kul me allowed hai.
स्री को किसी के protection की जरुरत नहीं है, वो खुद काली है, शिव का गुस्सा है शक्ति, शक्ति का एक ही पती है शिव और शिव की एक ही पत्नी है शक्ति. बनाने वाले ने खुद आकर कभी नहीं बताया के औरत पुरुष के उपर डिपेंड है, हा प्रेम जरूर हो सकता है पर डिपेंड नही.
mere mann me yeh aa raha hai ki aaj se 10-15 saal pehle itna gyaan ya knowlege kyun nhi thi bharat desh main ek dum se sab badal gya hum sabhi sanatanio ko sahi mayine main hindutatav kya hai ab pata chal raha hai
aapse poocha kisne hai jisne valmiki ramayan tk nhi pdhi hogi vo shri ram chandra ki jai likhr apne aap ko gyani smzh rha hai ye hai kaliyuga ke murkh log 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
@@radhashyamsundar_m bhi ladka hu mujhe to nahi lagta ki kuch galat h, mardon ko aurton milingi to unhe kya padi h strongly disagree seriously how u are different from muslims then
@@radhashyamsundar_ kyon valmiki ramayan mein likha h kya ki ek dharmik purush ke liye kai striyon se vivah krna aawasyak h , tum pdhe ho n jara doubt clear kro ..
@@realme9pro959 ok then shri krsna,shivaji maharaj,maharana pratap and thousands of more kings were a muslim okay ? bhai yaar thoda shastra pdhliye hote tou pta hota ki kyu multiple wives rkhte the strong mens, sbko nhi krni chaye ek se zayada shadi but kuch logo ko krni chaiye ye shastra agya krta hai vrna aaj ke jaise napunsak generation paida hogi
Sir I'm here to break your perception and I totally deny the conclusions you made above. Let me provide you some critical points. 1. I saw you in the above video that you are very comfortable in saying incapable males over and over again. But I haven't heard you saying incapable females. Incapability is not owned by males, if you want to make the right conclusion, incapability should not be associated with males or either females, both genders can fall in that category. I say this because your reason for polygamy is the incapability of male, but you need to be very clear that females can also be incapable. This game of capability and incapability still does not decide whether polygamy should be accepted or rejected by society. You are in an assumption that 50 out of 50 females will be capable . But you are very clear in making the assumption that 47 out of 50 males are incapable. That is a flaw. 2. Suppose I assume that we have a small sample of 50 males and 50 females. If only 1 male stands out the criteria of being a capable male set by you,are you concluding that 50 females will be married to single capable men? And all other 49 males will be dumped down into the dustbin? If you think like this, this is serious administration failure and a pathetic sense of understanding vedas and Dharma. Each and every individual has the right to get married whether it's male or female and putting 49 males into the dustbin is a serious loophole in your perception. And for the matter of fact, did you try to find the capability of 50 females? Because I'm dead sure that not all these 50 females will be capable of marrying that single man. So why don't you say- it is not good to marry an incapable girl with a capable man, since their children will be weak... As you said in the video.... 3. As a teacher of Vedic science and education, you should not be talking about incapabilities, you should have been talking about capabilities. Marrying 50 girls to a single capable man and putting others of no use or vice versa still won't change the society. Making 47 incapable males capable is the solution by providing the education of Sanatan Dharma . Even if you give multiple examples from the past including Dashrath, Maharana Pratap and Shivaji for polygamy, you cannot justify polygamy because these are special cases. They were kings, some of them married because they were not having children to take their empire as a Successor, or some of them had to marry other girls due to some situational reasons. Before you say polygamy is okay, you should have an insight about what was the ratio of men and women at that time and what is the ratio of men women today before providing any conclusion. Krishna married multiple girls not only because he was capable. Do you think he was just capable of 16108 wives ? He can marry all in this world, and still he is capable of more wives without any limit . In fact when he came, no other man was capable enough in front of him. He married these girls because in past lives, all these women were sages and devotees of God and all of these girls wanted pleasure to have Krishna as their husband. To make the wishes of their devotees true, Krishna accepted all in a single Avataar. If he would have married 1 girl , then other 16107 would have to wait Krishna for his next cycle and this would have resolved if Krishna would have appeared 16108 times in different yugas and it would have been more complex. So he married all in single go. 4. A true capable man will not wait for multiple women to come to him. He is capable because he is beyond girls. He has a big purpose to marry. But his purpose is not only to marry. And if a capable man marries multiple girls, then his capability will be completed in just satisfying his multiple wives and he will no longer be left as capable in future. Lord Rama was capable of everything, still he married only to Mata Sita.
Forget about polygamy if this right or wrong. This is kalyug, we're witnessing so much Adharm these days. We need strong morals to improve the situation. So just follow the path of Mariyada Purushottom Shree Ram. Husband should be Patnivrat, Wife should be Pativrata and both should be a good human and complimentary to each other. Simple! Ram Ram..
Krishna's all wives were the incarnation of the same goddess i.e mahalaxmi mata as per shrimad bhagwatam. Krishna was the incarnation of Narayan bhagwan and all his consorts were only maa laxmi. Even all the Gopis of Vrindavan, Shrimati Radha ji were also the same goddess Mahalaxmi. When we read the Ramayan's jayant story where he( Jayant) tried to hurt maa Sita ji, Ram said to maa Sita that in treta yug or in this avatar he was unable to perform the divine RasLeela, so he will perform the Leela in his next birth or incarnation along with maa Sita( Radha, Gopis, queens of dwarka) and Sita will take many forms( shahastra or thousands of forms) to please Ram in Krishna avtar. That's why Krishna had many wives in dwapar yug who were the incarnation of the same goddess. If we look at purans then we'll get to know that Krishna also took many many forms and lived with his queens. He also took 16108 forms and took care of his queens. So, the conclusion here is that he wasn't living with his queens in one form but he took many many forms for his wives and he followed the patnivrata Dharma. Jai Laxmi Narayan ji 🙏
To all ur qstns there's jst one simple answer that is Women r born with value and men have to create their value which is why our elders used say that women should preserve their value where as men has to attain their value....
Hare Krishna...! I have few questions १) नएं भक्त होतो नाम जप करे या कोई मंत्र का जप करे, अगर नाम जप करना है तो जो ygnopavit नही हे वो किसका नाम करे और कोनसा मंत्र जप करे, कितनी माला करनी और कुछ विधि short में उदाहरण सहित समझाए २) सदगुरु की आइडियोलॉजी सनातन शास्त्र क्यूं मान्य नहीं करते अंतर समझाए ३) पक्व शास्त्र कब आयेगी प्रभु और दूसरी किताबे अब इंतजार नहीं हो रहा ४) कोर्स कब लॉन्च कर रहे हो ?
Hare Krishna Prabhuji 🙏🏼 Please caste system pe video bnao aise he property explain kro Shastro me caste system ke baare me kya diya hua hai , kya misconception hai . Hmare Santana Dharma ko bas ese ne badnaam kiya hua hai
Ramchandra ji toh ek hi patni ko apnaya the...sita ji k alava kisi ko nahi chahe....aur ve toh maryada purushottam hai....sach me controversial hai prabhuji🤔🙏🏻😨
@@oreo12469हे बहना, आपको सबसे पहले समझना होगा कि असल मे कही भी कोइ भी भगवान नही है, ये सब हमारे पूर्वज ज्ञानी, दार्शनिक, ऋषि-मुनी, महात्माओ ने हमे प्रकृति मे घटने वाली घटनाओं को देखने का एक दर्शन और सिद्धांत दिया है, असल मे हम मानव है और हमारा जो मन है वो जब इन घटनाओं को देखता है तो ढेरों सारे प्रश्न पूछने लगता है और जो अज्ञान और अहंकार से ग्रसित होता है वो बेतुके उत्तर से एक काल्पनिक व्यक्ति पर सारी जिम्मेदारियो को थोप देता है जिसे हम भगवान कह देते है, और जो आत्मज्ञान से परिपूर्ण और मुक्त पुरुष होता है वो उन घटनाओं का अर्थ बडी सहजता और आत्मनिरीक्षण कर प्राकृतिक चक्र को समझ जाता है और देख कर आनंद उठाता है। हमे समझना होगा की हमारे जितने भी देवी देवता है वो हमारे जीवन के हमारे चारित्र के उत्तर के केंद्र है अर्थ है। हमारी आंतरिक जगत की एक तालाश है जिसको पाने के लिये हम यूही भटकते रहते है, आपका आत्मज्ञान, आपकी प्रकाशीत वृत्तीया से भगवान का स्वरूप है, इसलिये आप अपने आप को और इस जगत को समझिये, यहा आपका अनेको अहंकारी पुरुष घूम है आपको मूर्ख बनाने के लिये आपका मानसिक शोषण करने के लिये। इसलिये (अपो दीपो भव:)
Kalyug mai people want multiple partners, & no marriage. I.e they want unlimited enjoyment but no responsibility. So for society sake some do one marriage n do enjoyment elsewhere. I don't think there are men in kalyuga of that potential n calibre to take responsibility of many wives with dharma n duties in center... Dharma n shatras r ideal. But as you say, it changes as per audience, this audience hardly can manage for monogamy.. that's only good for this time.
Forget about polygamy if this right or wrong, if this is Dharm or Adharm. The main thing is that we need to walk on the path of Mariyada Purushottom Shree Ram in this kalyug. Husbands should be Patnivrat, Wives should be Pativrata, and both should be a good human and complimentary to each other. Simple! Ram Ram..
भारत के सबसे महान वैदिक ऋषि जिन्होंने साक्षात यजुर्वेद संहिता का एक भाग ईश्वर से ग्रहण किया उस महर्षि याग्यवाल्क्य की मैत्रेयी और कात्यायनी नाम की दो बीवीयां थी, एक सनातनी व्यक्ति की दो बीवियां होना उसे बुद्धिमान नरों में सर्वश्रेष्ठ बनाता है, इसलिए कम से कम दो बीवीयां तो एक साथ एक घर में होनी ही होनी चाहिए
फ्री वैदिक लाइब्रेरी : www.veducation.world/library
Veducation App Free : play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.veducation&pcampaignid=web_share
All Veducation Books : www.veducation.world/store/books
या फिर Amazon से पाइए👇🏼
B.O.S.S Hindi : amzn.to/3zCsgQi
B.O.S.S Eng : amzn.to/3sz9kiP
Vedic Dincharya : amzn.to/40J9gLG
•••
0:00 शास्त्र बदल क्यों गए?
0:28 शास्त्र कभी नहीं बदले, न कभी बदलेंगे
0:49 युगधर्म क्या होते है?
1:10 त्रेतायुग में यज्ञ कैसे होते थे?
1:31 सोने के 6 प्रकार
3:13 कौन एक से अधिक पत्नियाँ रख सकता है?
4:30 स्त्री को क्या चाहिए होता है?
5:47 पुरुष का कर्तव्य क्या है?
6:38 मॉडर्न पुरुष अधिक विवाह क्यों नहीं कर सकते?
7:10 कृष्ण भगवान ने अपनी बहन का विवाह ऐसे करवाया था
7:55 विवाह में Sex प्राथमिक नहीं है
10:00 भविष्यमें होगा ही
10:52 यदि अधिक विवाह नहीं लाए तो क्या होगा?
11:37 संस्कारी स्त्रियों के साथ अन्याय न हो
12:02 विवाह कब नहीं करना चाहिए?
12:50 परिवार के मोक्ष की ज़िम्मेदारी किसकी?
13:46 Equality जैसी कोई चीज़ नहीं होती
15:18 शास्त्र को सुगरकोट न करें
15:52 नया नज़रिया मिला 🙏🏻
ye ladki kon hai
Library me sri anu geeta kab ayegi
prabhuji apki library mein books ke pages ka ZOOM IN kar ne ka option available kar do mere Grandfather ko book padhne mein dikkat aa rahi hai please Hare Krishna
Shree ram ko bhul gaye unhone 1 hi vivah Kiya hai Unke bhaiyo ko bhul gaye aap dashrath ji ka name lo per shree ram ne to nahi Kiya unka udaharn bhi lelete
Bhai library Mai khuch nhi Chal rha Hai Kya kare😊😮😊
धर्म का सही प्रकार से अध्ययन कर आप हमेशा सही बाते सामने रखते हो ... आपको मेरा प्रणाम
Hare Krishna 😊
@@sangitayadav9720hare Krishna 🙏
MATLAB Aapke anusar arar ek admi monthly jyada kamarahahae or physically strong hae Woh ek patni rahetahae BHI dusri sadi karsakte yehi hae na .
Aaj kal koi BHI ledki ek purush ko nehin sadi karegi jiska pehele se ek patni hae
Toh yeah bakbazi mat karo
@@samirasamira1902 unhone iss chiz ko compulsory nahi kaha hai...but if you interested for it then become a man who is capable of it..
@@samirasamira1902didi mtlb samji Vedic yug mein sakht mana tha polygamy lekin baad mein jab hamare dharm ko budhist muslimon dwara khatam kar Diya gaya tha, kyunki baaki panth kaafi choot dete the aadmi ko jese polygamy wagarah, isliye hamare dharm guruon ne dharm ka patan rokne ke liye ye sab jor diya, ab yeh hamari jimmedari hai ki hum yeh sab khatam Karen jese is bhai ne bola hai 😊
वंदे मातरम् प्रभु जी!
मैं संजय! उत्तराखण्ड के अल्मोड़ा जनपद से हूं, मुझे यूट्यूब से आपके विषय में जानकारी प्राप्त हुई, आपको राष्ट्र हित और जन कल्याण हेतु धर्म का कार्य करता देख अत्यंत प्रसन्नता होती हैं,
प्रभू जी, मुझे भी ब्रह्मचर्य पालन कर अपना जीवन देश और अपने माता पिता को समर्पित करना है लेकिन मुझे कहीं इस तरह का माहौल नही मिल पा रहा है
अतः मेरा आपसे विनम्र निवेदन है कि आप मुझे भी अपने प्रोजेक्ट गोल्डन बर्ड में सेवा का मौका प्रदान करें ।
Pandav sena se jud jaen. Aapka samay aane par contact karenge.
Join Pandav Sena :
forms.gle/qTPVQFmYmgiAwfdK9
Best Video ever about explanation polygamy in our Sanatan Dharm 🥇
मैं तो मर्यादा पुरुषोत्तम श्री राम को आदर्श मानता हुं इसलिए इक पत्नी का ही वरण करूँगा , यही उचित हैं l
tumhare icha ho tabhi tum kar nhi sakte hai Aaj ke saame mein .😂
❤apke liye ek like banta hai
मर्यादा पुरुषोत्तम??
सीता को जलने के लिए भेज दिया 😂😂
bandhu pehle poori ramayan padhlo vaise to sab prabhu ki leela hi hoti hai aur vo leela unhone us samay ki praja to santusht krne k liye ki thi as he is a king and as a king has the formost duty to satisfy the commoners with their mindset aur unhe to poorna vishvaas tha maata sita ki pavitrata pe lekin unhone isliye kiya taki tum jaise jhandu aur baaki log unpe ungli na utha sake aur jab pareeksha mata ne di to prabhu ne bhi di thi as laxinarayan is not a man and woman like us vo anant kaal se ek hai jab maata ko praja ke kaaran vanvaas jaana pada tab prabhu ko bhi bahut kasht tha so please dont ever dare to blame Lord rama for his decisions kyunki hum aur tum bahut tuccha hai aur buddhiheen hai unke samaksh jo unki leelayein samajh sake
@@GoodMan98rfRamayan padhi bhi hai tumne 🤣🤣🤣
This man is a revolution (mahapurush hai yeh vyakti.. Bhagwan inko lambi umar de aur hamesha kush rakhe duniya ko roshni ki taraf leke jaane ke liye shukriya prabhu ji)
वो दूसरे युग थे जिसमे कई पत्नियां होती थी, आज होगा तो बर्बादी का कारण होगा।कलयुग में सब कुछ अलग है।अभी समाज बहुत जटिल हो चुका है।
Raja Jo rajisthan Gujrat aur dusre area m hote the aaj se 100 sal phle un sabhi ki 3_4 se Jada hoti thi. Maharaja Pratap ki 16 wife thi.
कब कलियुग नहीं था ?
Isi yug me 100 sal pahle kai bengaliyo ki 40 patniya hoti thi.
Are Bhai नियम आज भी same है तुम सक्षम हो उन सभी स्त्रियों का भरण पोषण और सुरक्षा देने के लिए तो तुम कर सकते हो
मै तो 2 शादी करूंगा 🍃🍃
@@BackbiteOfficialAbe tu barbad ho jayega 😂😂
Pranam Prabhuji I was just watching some of your podcast and thinking about this same question ( just 1hour ago ) 😅
What a coincidence
हम आपके बात से पूर्ण सहमत हैं
सत्य वच् न , ❤क्या कहे , आप धन्य हो, बात जरा कटू हैं, लेकिन यह एकदम सत्य है. जो purushottama h, उन्हें एक् se jyada patniya karne ka purna adhikar h. Wo purush, jo janata ho, स्त्री को क्या चाहिये, सुरक्षा हो, अन्न, वस्त्र, निवारा हो, और पती का प्रेम हो, फ़िर पती और कितनी पत्नीया रखे, इस् से कोई problem नही
ky gandugiri chal rhi hai , me inko follow krta tha aaj tak?? dharm k naam pe kuch bhe??
me apne bachi ka shadi kisi normal middle class purush se krwana chhahunga jo usse pyer kare wo khush reh saki naaki 10 wife wale ambani se jo unko sirf provide kr sake..
Hare Krishna prabhuji 🙏, so so nice..
Prabhu can u make a book stating that how sanatana Dharma is not a mythology.
Please help the upcoming youth, as many people depend on your books and value them.
Hare Krishna.
Iska already Aisa book 📚 published hai check ✔️ on Google
@@gauravpandey5897name pls
No need..... Hazaro proofs aur videos already hain par jisko interest ni hai ya jisko maannaa nahi hai vo ni maanega isliye faltu me pareshaan mat karo Prabhu Ji ko
Firstly, we can't prove anything other than mahabharat because most recent ramayan some crore years ago. Mahabharat places are still found like ahicchatra and kans Kila which was taken over by kushan empire.
जो श्री राम के नहीं वो किसी काम के नहीं बोलो जय श्री राम ❤❤❤
जिसने यह सेलफोन बनाकर दिया है, वह बड़ा रामभक्त था
Jay Shree Ram 🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏
Prabhuji mene aapki purani vali live dekhi thi usme mujhe laga ki aap ye kya bol rahe ho par aaj aap ne ekdum badiya explain kiya 🙏🙏🙏
Agressive hokar Jai ShreeRam bolke jo log nahi kar pate aap bo dhirshtir rahkar Jai ShreeRam bolke kar dete ho.. Yahi apke khasiyat hai. Apka bhut bhut dhanyavaad.. 🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻 Jai ShreeRam.. 🙏🏻
Ek pati apne ek patni ko achhe se pyar,security samman de shakta hai ek se jada honge to yea kabhi nehi ho payega pratically soche to aur ahi praman Ramayan me Ram chandra ne diya tha unke pita k 3 patni k baja se hi unko vanbas me jana pada tha,Ram ji wohi neeti tod ek adarsh vivah ka example diya tha isiliye Ram chandra ko hi purushottom Ram kaha jata hai jo har yug k liye adarsh hai jinhe har insan ko follow karna chahiye.
Bilkul sahi 💯
Kuch logic iss baat ka kuch nhi
Dharm tumari icchao pe nhi chalta
हर हर महादेव 🕉️🚩🙌
हम आपके साथ हैं🙏🏼
Sach mein shastron ke adhyayan dwara hi itni neer ksheer vivekpurna buddhi prapt ho sakti hai. Saadar pranaam.
After watching the video i can agree to some points but i also disagree to many. First, in ancient vedic period the 4 ashrams were followed. You may get marry or you may not get married its completely your choice. The 4 ashramas are there. Both men and women were allowed to have their choices because we find many brahmacharis as examples. Now, i completely disagree that their was any hierarchy in Dharma. Everyone had to do their part as a human being to attain God be it man or women. There was mention of many Vidushis who were equally given right to education and read vedas to pursue God. I would not say that there is any hierarchy among man and woman. Both are equally important. That's why the wife is called the ardhanagini. We worship Ardhanarishwar. Shiv and Shakti. And we say that Shiv and Shakti cannot exist without each other. We worship Devi personified as woman. But of course there is division of responsibilities for both. Although souls donot have any gender,The body you are born with is tied with some responsibilities and you can't escape it. We see Devi Maa fulfilling every responsibility as a wife and mother but still perform her other duty as the protector by killing the demons. The grihasta ashram is associated with marriage only for the sole cause of creating the next generation. To form a better environment for the next generation. Our Dharma don't encourage polygamy. Secondly, polygamy was allowed in that period because the male was capable of taking the responsibility equally and its also because of many societal and political reasons. That doesn't mean it is right. We can see Ram had only one wife while Krishna had many. But both are avatars, purushottam. Ram never encountered any circumstances where he had to marry anyone else. He promised mata sita. While Krishna face many circumstances where he had to marry so many wives. But he was equally available to each of them at the same time. He took many forms and was there with each of his wives at the same time as per Bhagwat puran.Although it seems like polygamy but it was monogamy since bhagwan Krishna knew the importance of being one on one in marriage. Again if we see those 16108 wives are the form of the same Mata Lakshmi. So where is the polygamy? So, bhagwan Ram and Bhagwan Krishna are out of question. Many kings marry for many reasons. But one thing thing is very important to know that those kings are equally available and responsible for all their wives. Its not out of lust but its out of duties. However, this is kalyug, many kings in the history do have many wives, they do took their responsibilities seriously but i doubt that their personal lives were peaceful. Because in Kalyug, neither the male nor the females have the same qualities as the people of other yug. So, its best to have monogamy in kalyug to have a peaceful and developed family life.
Made sense even without reading shastra
💯💯💯💯💯👍👍👍👍👍
Exactly 👏💯💯
You are right...I too was not able to accept this didactic system of hierarchy as he claims are in shahtras.... I am happy to see your stand point...and I totally agree 💯 👍
@@shrutitripathi5105 Bhagwad Geeta never said anything about hierarchy among humans and as Geeta is the Brahm Gyan we should follow it.
प्रभू आपके १०८००० गुरुकुल के लिये एक छोटासा दक्षिणा.
आपको बताना चाहुंगा की मे महाराष्ट्र राज्य के एक छोटेसे गाव से हू. हमारे गाव के मेरे कूछ युवा मित्र ऑर मे मिलकर निधी जमा करते हे, ऑर छत्रपती शिवाजी महाराज के नाम से मोहीम चलाते हे जिसमे हम गरीब पारिस्थिती वाले लोगोंकी मदत करते हे, वृध्दाश्रम, रुग्णालयो मे अन्नदान करते हे. प्रभू अभी सिर्फ शुरुवात की हे, घर से इतना सहकार्य नही मिलता क्यो की आयु कम है फिलाल ११ वी मेही हू. लेकीन मेरा मानना हे की पढाई भी करेंगे, ऑर हरी नाम भी लेंगे !
|| हरी बोल... जय श्री कृष्ण ||
*जय शिवराय जय भवानी 🚩🚩🚩
Jay Jay Shivray ☀️
Are isne bohot mahino se bol rakha tab se isne ek bhi Naya gurukul nahi banaya hai 12 pe hi iska number atka hai kab ka aur mujhe to nahi lagta ki ye pure 108000 gurukul bana paega is speed se Kam Kiya to
Plz support gurukus & iskcon... Hari bol... I'm also from Maharashtra
Bahot kuch sikhne ko mila, bahot bahot dhanyawad guruji.
Har yug k niyam alag hote hain, like Satyug- dhyan, Treta- yagya, Dwapar- Vigrah Pujan & Kalyug- Naam jap🙏
Wese hi pehle k yugo kliye possible tha 1 se adhik vivah krke sabko saman roop se sath leker chalna... Is Kalyug me to 1 wife k sath b jiwan thik se ni chlta logo ka, bhagwat sewa bhakti, suraksha etc to dur k baat hai... To 1 se zyada wife rakhenge to har ghar kurukshetra ka maidan ban jayega🙆 jo b thodi bahut shanti hai kuch families me wo b bhang ho jayegi😅
So better hai k SiyaRam ji k jese 1 pati, 1 patni shanti se rahein...& Apne kartavyo ka sahi se palan krte hue Prabhu k Shri charno k dhyan k sath bhakti sewa karne k koshish karein😌🙏
Great answer to this question ♥️♥️❣️❣️..
Hari bol 🙌🏻🍁
Hare Krishna prabhuji 🙇🏻♀️🙏😇 thank you for this amazing video 🙏✨🌺🙌
Aaj apse mulakat hui Prabhu jii..🙏🙏hare Krishna 🙏
उन्होंने यह कैसे सोच लिया कि चार-पांच शादियां होंगी तो परिवार सुखी रहेगा और कोई भेदभाव नहीं होगा, अन्यथा राम स्वयं एकविवाहित रहने का निर्णय नहीं लेते।राजा दशरथ सक्षम थे, लेकिन परिवारों में आंतरिक भेदभाव , उनके परिवार में राजनीतिक कलह थी, कृष्ण की कई शादियों के बावजूद असमानता थी, उनके बेटे और बेटियां उनकी अवज्ञा करती थीं, उनकी पत्नियाँ उनकी अवज्ञा करती थीं, इसलिए निर्णय की आवश्यकता वहां थी जहां दोनों समान हों।
Ram is regarded as Maryada Purushottam, the most ideal man. His reign is called Ram-Rajya, an ideal statehood and administration. Ram remained loyal to only one wife, Sita, in her presence or absence. We follow his ideals.
In most of the civilised societies, polygamy is prohibited. We also forbid it on grounds of morality, equality, legality, stability, liberty.
Leave religion for a second, would you be happy if your father had multiple wifes? Would your mother be happy?
Yeah some people back then used to marry multiple wife, but thats not ideal; Ideal is what Shree Rama does, rest are just hearsay.
Yes. Lord Ram's father had 703 wives (3 being major), he equally treated all of them like his own mothers.
Narayan 🙏🏻
@@Veducation jai jai narayan sir
Lekin aapki iss tark se ki saksham purush k adhik patniya rakhni chahiye, toh shree rama ji ne adhik patniya kyu nhi rakhi?
Wo toh saksham the, wo toh pati k liye poore sansaar mei sabs uttam the, toh sirf ma sita ko hi kyi chuna?
Kya shree rama ji ko nhi pata tha aapke tark k bare mei? Aur kya unhone anek vivah na karne k karan ek uttam kaam karne mei vifal hue?
Jai Narayan 🙏
@@Veducation his father was not perfect purush. So his example is totally waste and illogical.
@@VeducationGood luck with fulfilling your fantasy of marrying multiple girls, let's see which girl marries u lol. No decent family will give their girl to a guy who wants to have multiple wives.
@@Walkie-Talkie-zz9ck shree ram ne adhik patniya krsna roop me rkhi tou hai bhai, ab tu kya khna chahra hai ki bhagwat gita bolne vale param bhagwaan shri krsna ko dharma ka gyan nhi tou shri ram and shri krsna dono ek hi hai and dono hi shi hai kutark krne vala topic nhi hai ye, sanatan has multiple paths, jisme ek path hai ki agr purush apni ek patni se bhot prem krta hai tou vo use vada krta hai ki ham dusri patni nhi layenge its vrata of husband(maryada purshottam) its about sweet lovely relationship between couples( its ideal for normal mens) , secondly shri ram param bhagwaan the unhe pta tha aage sita tyag hoga tou agr shri ram ki anek patniya hoti tou sb khte ki ram tou ek bhogi vyakti tha jisne sita ko tyag diya kyunki uske paas aaur striyo ki kami nhi thi
bhai ek advice hai meri trf se ya tou tu sanatani ho jaa ya fir so called western ho jaa ye beech ka path mt le jab shastra agya kr rhe hai hai saksham purusho( kings,rishis,wealthy peoples) ko anek vivah ke liye tou zayada dimaag mt chla, shri krsna ne bhi kiya na vo glt tha kya nhi na, shri ram also has madhurya rasa leela in his dham, secondly agr kaliyuga is worst yuga agr yha koi cheez promote ho rhi voo automatically wrong hai phle multiple wives rkhte the and ab rkhne ka dam nhi tou issi se pta lgta hai phle ke log hi shi the because satyuga,treta,dwapar people are more intelligent and less lusty than today if still tehy are keeping multiple wives then even logically they are right
Hare Krishna Prabhu Ji....🙏🙏🙏
Koti koti pranam aapko....🙏🙏🙏
Jai Shrila Prabhupad Ji....🙏🙏🙏
ये बात ठीक है कि अयोग्य वर से कन्या का विवाह नहीं करना चाहिए पर इसका ये मतलब भी नहीं कि जो विवाहित है उसे अपनी कन्या दे दी जाए।
प्रत्येक मनुष्य की केवल एक पत्नी होनी चाहिए।
Best podcast ever 👍
Hari bol prabhu ji❤
HARe KRISHNA prabhuji dandvat pranam 🙇
Hare Krishna prabhuji ❤
बहुत अच्छे से आपने इस बात को समझाया और मैं पूरी तरह सहमत भी हूं
किंतु जैसा अपने कहा युग बदलते है तो कुछ पद्धतियां भी बदलती हैं इसलिए शायद आज के परिप्रेक्ष्य में बहु विवाह को उचित नहीं माना जा रहा
❤સત્ય સનાતન ધમૅ ની જય હો❤
Recently I was thing about this 😂 and I got this video of your prabhu ❤
🚩 जय श्री हरिवंश 🚩
🚩🚩Ram krishan Hari🚩🚩🙏🙏
Jai shree Ram 🚩🚩
Dada hare Krishna 😊
एक स्त्री भी अनेक पुरुषों से विवाह करती थी। ऐसे कुछ उदाहरण भी मिलते हैं शास्त्रों में। इसके बारे में भी आपको बताना चाहिए था।
Maharani Draupadi ke bare mein suna hai maine baki kon the.
@@prasoonpandey835
मैंने एक और उदाहरण के बारे में सुना है, एक ऋषिका ने १०/११ ऋषि के साथ विवाह किया था।
आपातकाल धर्म मे।
अगर एक ल़डकि multiple पति रखेगा तो उस ल़डकि के उप्पर सेक्सुअल trauma बड़ने का चांस बहुत ज्यादा है।
.….vedo me ek se adhik patni rakhne
Ka virodh💛
🛑*ऋग्वेद के मंत्र 10.105.8 के अनुसार एक से अधिक पत्नियों की मौजूदगी से अनेक सांसारिक आपदाओं का जन्म होता है।
💚*ऋग्वेद १०.१०१.११ कहता है:- दो पत्नियों वाला व्यक्ति उसी प्रकार दोनों तरफ से दबाया हुआ विलाप करता है, जैसे रथ हांकते समय उस के अरों से दोनों ओर जकड़ा हुआ घोड़ा हिनहिनाता है।
💜*ऋग्वेद १०.१०१.११ के अनुसार दो पत्नियां जीवन को निरुदेश्य बना देती हैं।
💓*इसी तरह अथर्ववेद ३.१८.२ में प्रार्थना है कि 'कोई भी स्त्री सह-पत्नी के भय का कभी सामना न करे।
🧡*अथर्ववेद मंत्र ७.३६.१ के अनुसार पति-पत्नी परस्पर कामना करते हैं- .मुझ को ह्रदय में स्थान दो, जिस से हम दोनों का मन भी सदा साथ रहे।'
💜*अथर्ववेद ७.३८.४ में पत्नी की यह हार्दिक अभिलाषा व्यक्त की गई है कि 'तुम केवल मेरे हो अन्य स्त्रियों की चर्चा भी न करो।'
💚अथर्ववेद के एक अन्य मंत्र ३.३०.२ तथा १४.२.६४ में पति और पत्नी को परस्पर समर्पित तथा एकनिष्ठ रहने की हिदायत दी गई है।
💙*ऋग्वेद के तीनों मंत्र १.१२४.७, ४.३.२ तथा १०.७१.४ वर्णित करते हैं:- .जाया पत्य उशासी सुवासा' अर्थात विद्या विद्वानों के पास उसी प्रकार आती है जैसे एक समर्पित हर्षदायिनी पत्नी सिर्फ अपने पति को ही प्राप्त होती है।' 'जाया' तथा ‘पत्य’ क्रमशः पत्नी तथा पति का अर्थ रखते हैं।
⬇️*ऋग्वेद मंत्र संख्या १.३.३ में परमात्मा को पवित्र और उच्च आचरण वाली समर्पित पत्नी की उपमा दी गई है, जिसमें एक पत्नीत्व का आदर्श भी अन्तर्निहित है।
💤*ऋग्वेद मंत्र संख्या १०.१४९.४ में भगवन और भक्त के मध्य प्रेम की तुलना समार्पित पत्नी और पति के प्रेम से करता है।
🧠*ऋग्वेद मंत्र संख्या १०.८५.२० में वधू के लिए निर्देश है कि वह अपने पति के लिए सुख की वृद्धि करे।
🖤*ऋग्वेद मंत्र संख्या १०.८५.२३ में पत्नी और पति को सदैव आत्म-संयम के पालन की शिक्षा दी गई है।
विवाह से संबंधित सभी मंत्र द्विवचन सूचक शब्द दंपत्ति को संबोधित करते हैं, जो एक ही पत्नी और एक ही पति के रिश्ते को व्यक्त करता है। जिस के कुछ उदाहरण ऋग्वेद १०.८५.२४, १०.८५.४२ तथा १०.८५.४७ में मिल जाएंगे। अथर्ववेद के लगभग सम्पूर्ण १४वें कांड में विवाह विषयक वर्णन में इसका उपयोग हुआ है। प्रायः मंत्रों में जीवन पर्यंत एकनिष्ठ रहने के संबंध में प्रार्थना की गई है।
@@prasoonpandey835unhe shrap th 😮
Mujhe iss topic pe bhut dino se doubt tha thanku prabhuji aaj apne clear krr diya
श्री सीताराम 🙏🏻🍁
Hare Krishna kitna wait kr na hoga new video ke liye
Jai shree Krishna prabhuji ❤
Hare Krishna Hare ram
Capable men deserve capable women like Durga and Shiva ... srishti me dono k hona jaruri hai ..ha stree shararik roop se thodi weak hogi pr duniya me shararik roop se mazboot purush unhi se aate hai ...
Hamara dharm (Sanatan) mahan
Thanku so much bhaiya g,aapne hamare jaise ka galat dharna wala mindset change kar dete ho !
You are always right vadil 🙏🏻
Veducation app ke liye dhanyabad ❤❤❤
Hare krishna ❤
Sahi baat prateek bhai ke sath
Yes, polygamy is completely a legit thing as per Vedas, there are so many examples, Dasharath maharaj, Janak maharaj, Arjun, Bheem etc., and also some of the great saints like Gora kumbhar, Annamalai had more than one wife. 🚩🙏
वेद में एक पति, एक पत्नी विधान है।
polygamy को ठीक नहीं माना गया लेकिन इसको क्रिमिनल offence भी माना नहीं गया।
Lol tum log khud confuse ho
Monogamy ya polygamy 😂
Draupadi ka example kyu nahi Diya fir yaha pe, wo bhi bhagvan Krishna ne valid bataya tha to ladkiya bhi zyada pati rakhe? Dharma sirf shadi karne ka naam he, ek se zyada shadi karke hi dharm ka palan hota he, kuch bhi concept leke bas bol do
@@GoodMan98rfboth are allowed but monogamy is praised.
@@nisha77788nahi. Mata druapadi ke Panch pati ki katha puri padhiye. Usme akshep ka nivaran devo ne swayam akar kiya hai.
Polyandry keval kuch kul me allowed hai.
Jai shree Ram 🙏🚩
Very nice concept ❤
Agreed, Nothing is equal and that inequality must be balanced out with kindness.
Ajj ke samy mein toh ek bhi shadi bekar hai 😂😂 kyuki bas hwas or swarth hai 😢😢😢😢
For real bro 😂
The truth is , some impotent people who couldn't produce , provide and protect criminalized it because they got no balls 🤣🤣🤣🤣
Prabhu ji
Aapne mera thought process zinmedaari ke maamle mae bahut uncha badhaa diya !!!!
Thank you so much
Jay Shree Krishna❤
Hare Krishna prabhuji ❤❤
Thank you for this lesson
जय श्री राम
स्री को किसी के protection की जरुरत नहीं है, वो खुद काली है, शिव का गुस्सा है शक्ति, शक्ति का एक ही पती है शिव और शिव की एक ही पत्नी है शक्ति. बनाने वाले ने खुद आकर कभी नहीं बताया के औरत पुरुष के उपर डिपेंड है, हा प्रेम जरूर हो सकता है पर डिपेंड नही.
Jai shree Ram
Prabhuji 14:00 pr ek detailed video banaiye ye jaanna Aaj bohot zaruri hai ki kaise ye modern system bogus hai
Bahot sunder 😊🙏
I am full happy
mere mann me yeh aa raha hai ki aaj se 10-15 saal pehle itna gyaan ya knowlege kyun nhi thi bharat desh main ek dum se sab badal gya hum sabhi sanatanio ko sahi mayine main hindutatav kya hai ab pata chal raha hai
Jai Sanatan Dharma 🔱🚩
Sir aap ne bohot sari dute clear kar diya ❤😊 or bohot si bate sikh me aaj 🤞💯😌 💫
Jay shree radhe krishna ❤❤
Awesome Explanation Bro
Strongly disagree
Raja ramchandra ki jai
aapse poocha kisne hai jisne valmiki ramayan tk nhi pdhi hogi vo shri ram chandra ki jai likhr apne aap ko gyani smzh rha hai
ye hai kaliyuga ke murkh log 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
@@radhashyamsundar_m bhi ladka hu mujhe to nahi lagta ki kuch galat h, mardon ko aurton milingi to unhe kya padi h strongly disagree seriously how u are different from muslims then
@@radhashyamsundar_ kyon valmiki ramayan mein likha h kya ki ek dharmik purush ke liye kai striyon se vivah krna aawasyak h , tum pdhe ho n jara doubt clear kro ..
@@realme9pro959 ok then shri krsna,shivaji maharaj,maharana pratap and thousands of more kings were a muslim okay ?
bhai yaar thoda shastra pdhliye hote tou pta hota ki kyu multiple wives rkhte the strong mens, sbko nhi krni chaye ek se zayada shadi but kuch logo ko krni chaiye ye shastra agya krta hai vrna aaj ke jaise napunsak generation paida hogi
😂😂😂@@radhashyamsundar_
Prabhu ji, ek saval hai - "1 purush ke anek patni ho sakti hai par 1 stri ke anek pati kyu nahi..... कृपया मार्गदर्शन करें।🙏🏼🙏🏼 जय सिया राम 🔥⚡🚩
Bagwan alag he insan alag he
Abhi ka time me 1 shadi karna hi teek he
बहुत सुंदर कार्य करते हो आप ..
Namaskaram prabhu ji🙏🏻
राधा राधा राधा राधा राधा राधा राधा ❤
Thank you prabhuji 🙏
Hare Krishna Prabhu ji
Sir I'm here to break your perception and I totally deny the conclusions you made above. Let me provide you some critical points.
1. I saw you in the above video that you are very comfortable in saying incapable males over and over again. But I haven't heard you saying incapable females.
Incapability is not owned by males, if you want to make the right conclusion, incapability should not be associated with males or either females, both genders can fall in that category. I say this because your reason for polygamy is the incapability of male, but you need to be very clear that females can also be incapable. This game of capability and incapability still does not decide whether polygamy should be accepted or rejected by society. You are in an assumption that 50 out of 50 females will be capable . But you are very clear in making the assumption that 47 out of 50 males are incapable. That is a flaw.
2. Suppose I assume that we have a small sample of 50 males and 50 females.
If only 1 male stands out the criteria of being a capable male set by you,are you concluding that 50 females will be married to single capable men? And all other 49 males will be dumped down into the dustbin? If you think like this, this is serious administration failure and a pathetic sense of understanding vedas and Dharma. Each and every individual has the right to get married whether it's male or female and putting 49 males into the dustbin is a serious loophole in your perception. And for the matter of fact, did you try to find the capability of 50 females? Because I'm dead sure that not all these 50 females will be capable of marrying that single man. So why don't you say- it is not good to marry an incapable girl with a capable man, since their children will be weak... As you said in the video....
3. As a teacher of Vedic science and education, you should not be talking about incapabilities, you should have been talking about capabilities. Marrying 50 girls to a single capable man and putting others of no use or vice versa still won't change the society.
Making 47 incapable males capable is the solution by providing the education of Sanatan Dharma . Even if you give multiple examples from the past including Dashrath, Maharana Pratap and Shivaji for polygamy, you cannot justify polygamy because these are special cases. They were kings, some of them married because they were not having children to take their empire as a Successor, or some of them had to marry other girls due to some situational reasons.
Before you say polygamy is okay, you should have an insight about what was the ratio of men and women at that time and what is the ratio of men women today before providing any conclusion.
Krishna married multiple girls not only because he was capable. Do you think he was just capable of 16108 wives ? He can marry all in this world, and still he is capable of more wives without any limit . In fact when he came, no other man was capable enough in front of him. He married these girls because in past lives, all these women were sages and devotees of God and all of these girls wanted pleasure to have Krishna as their husband. To make the wishes of their devotees true, Krishna accepted all in a single Avataar. If he would have married 1 girl , then other 16107 would have to wait Krishna for his next cycle and this would have resolved if Krishna would have appeared 16108 times in different yugas and it would have been more complex. So he married all in single go.
4. A true capable man will not wait for multiple women to come to him. He is capable because he is beyond girls. He has a big purpose to marry. But his purpose is not only to marry. And if a capable man marries multiple girls, then his capability will be completed in just satisfying his multiple wives and he will no longer be left as capable in future.
Lord Rama was capable of everything, still he married only to Mata Sita.
Awesome explanation 🙏🙏
Forget about polygamy if this right or wrong. This is kalyug, we're witnessing so much Adharm these days. We need strong morals to improve the situation. So just follow the path of Mariyada Purushottom Shree Ram.
Husband should be Patnivrat, Wife should be Pativrata and both should be a good human and complimentary to each other. Simple! Ram Ram..
Krishna's all wives were the incarnation of the same goddess i.e mahalaxmi mata as per shrimad bhagwatam.
Krishna was the incarnation of Narayan bhagwan and all his consorts were only maa laxmi. Even all the Gopis of Vrindavan, Shrimati Radha ji were also the same goddess Mahalaxmi.
When we read the Ramayan's jayant story where he( Jayant) tried to hurt maa Sita ji, Ram said to maa Sita that in treta yug or in this avatar he was unable to perform the divine RasLeela, so he will perform the Leela in his next birth or incarnation along with maa Sita( Radha, Gopis, queens of dwarka) and Sita will take many forms( shahastra or thousands of forms) to please Ram in Krishna avtar. That's why Krishna had many wives in dwapar yug who were the incarnation of the same goddess. If we look at purans then we'll get to know that Krishna also took many many forms and lived with his queens. He also took 16108 forms and took care of his queens. So, the conclusion here is that he wasn't living with his queens in one form but he took many many forms for his wives and he followed the patnivrata Dharma.
Jai Laxmi Narayan ji 🙏
To all ur qstns there's jst one simple answer that is Women r born with value and men have to create their value which is why our elders used say that women should preserve their value where as men has to attain their value....
Jay shree Krishna
Hare Krishna 🙏 dandavat pranam pravuji 😊
Hare Krishna...!
I have few questions
१) नएं भक्त होतो नाम जप करे या कोई मंत्र का जप करे, अगर नाम जप करना है तो जो ygnopavit नही हे वो किसका नाम करे और कोनसा मंत्र जप करे, कितनी माला करनी और कुछ विधि short में उदाहरण सहित समझाए
२) सदगुरु की आइडियोलॉजी सनातन शास्त्र क्यूं मान्य नहीं करते अंतर समझाए
३) पक्व शास्त्र कब आयेगी प्रभु और दूसरी किताबे अब इंतजार नहीं हो रहा
४) कोर्स कब लॉन्च कर रहे हो ?
Kaha se ate hain yeh log
Jai shree Ram ❤❤❤❤
Hare Krishna Prabhuji 🙏🏼
Please caste system pe video bnao aise he property explain kro
Shastro me caste system ke baare me kya diya hua hai , kya misconception hai . Hmare Santana Dharma ko bas ese ne badnaam kiya hua hai
Caste system nahi, class or group system.... railway group A post, group B post, group C post, group D post
Apni library me buy karne ka option bhi dal dijiye agar Aap dal sake to please concentrate bhi nhi hota he aur Aankh me bhi dard hota he please ❤❤
आपकी बात सुन नीतू अंबनी के पसीने छुट रहे होगें।
બરોબર છે!🔥✨👍😊
Ramchandra ji toh ek hi patni ko apnaya the...sita ji k alava kisi ko nahi chahe....aur ve toh maryada purushottam hai....sach me controversial hai prabhuji🤔🙏🏻😨
@@vedic_aryavarta this only made me to comment
@@oreo12469हे बहना, आपको सबसे पहले समझना होगा कि असल मे कही भी कोइ भी भगवान नही है, ये सब हमारे पूर्वज ज्ञानी, दार्शनिक, ऋषि-मुनी, महात्माओ ने हमे प्रकृति मे घटने वाली घटनाओं को देखने का एक दर्शन और सिद्धांत दिया है, असल मे हम मानव है और हमारा जो मन है वो जब इन घटनाओं को देखता है तो ढेरों सारे प्रश्न पूछने लगता है और जो अज्ञान और अहंकार से ग्रसित होता है वो बेतुके उत्तर से एक काल्पनिक व्यक्ति पर सारी जिम्मेदारियो को थोप देता है जिसे हम भगवान कह देते है, और जो आत्मज्ञान से परिपूर्ण और मुक्त पुरुष होता है वो उन घटनाओं का अर्थ बडी सहजता और आत्मनिरीक्षण कर प्राकृतिक चक्र को समझ जाता है और देख कर आनंद उठाता है।
हमे समझना होगा की हमारे जितने भी देवी देवता है वो हमारे जीवन के हमारे चारित्र के उत्तर के केंद्र है अर्थ है। हमारी आंतरिक जगत की एक तालाश है जिसको पाने के लिये हम यूही भटकते रहते है, आपका आत्मज्ञान, आपकी प्रकाशीत वृत्तीया से भगवान का स्वरूप है, इसलिये आप अपने आप को और इस जगत को समझिये, यहा आपका अनेको अहंकारी पुरुष घूम है आपको मूर्ख बनाने के लिये आपका मानसिक शोषण करने के लिये।
इसलिये (अपो दीपो भव:)
गुरु जी जो हर हर महादेव कहे या हरि हरा महादेव बोले
Kalyug mai people want multiple partners, & no marriage. I.e they want unlimited enjoyment but no responsibility. So for society sake some do one marriage n do enjoyment elsewhere. I don't think there are men in kalyuga of that potential n calibre to take responsibility of many wives with dharma n duties in center... Dharma n shatras r ideal. But as you say, it changes as per audience, this audience hardly can manage for monogamy.. that's only good for this time.
Forget about polygamy if this right or wrong, if this is Dharm or Adharm. The main thing is that we need to walk on the path of Mariyada Purushottom Shree Ram in this kalyug.
Husbands should be Patnivrat, Wives should be Pativrata, and both should be a good human and complimentary to each other. Simple! Ram Ram..
जय श्री राधे रानी
भारत के सबसे महान वैदिक ऋषि जिन्होंने साक्षात यजुर्वेद संहिता का एक भाग ईश्वर से ग्रहण किया उस महर्षि याग्यवाल्क्य की मैत्रेयी और कात्यायनी नाम की दो बीवीयां थी, एक सनातनी व्यक्ति की दो बीवियां होना उसे बुद्धिमान नरों में सर्वश्रेष्ठ बनाता है, इसलिए कम से कम दो बीवीयां तो एक साथ एक घर में होनी ही होनी चाहिए
सनातन धर्म मे बीवी नही होती, पत्नी होती है
Aur fir wo dono biwiyan tujhe roj dande se kutte 10vi to pass nahi kr pate aur do biwi chahiye .
Pehle yagyawallk to ban jayo jo ki tum million births me bhi nahi ban sakte
Har har Mahadev namo buddhaye ,