Glorification of end results in repetivimanner and far far too lenghtly is infuriatingly BORING. Atleast this was not a 'non-story' per se as much as they often turn out like, you know, where nothing likes of conflict ever gets described to detail by events each not really shownig strugle or changes of failure of goal or temporary failures on the way, but these encyclopedia + peaceful agenda propagandistic style writing, like out of a bad text book, which barely mentions some challenge, opposition or such and smooths it out by barely namig it was solved likely in some unbelievably peaceful a manner. Sincerely, still sounds like AI when it goes on and on as if not realizing italready ended and focuses on self evident lists ofhowsomething got to beall amazingly right or someentities became oh so famous. Influential... who cares. It is oftenadvised that a writer, especiallyon caring too much about getting reader fully up to speed, should coldly clip off entire firstpage to full chapter depending on how long their unnecessary info dump lasts having even no logical reason fit to the actual narrative toget discussed at all in thebegining because set characters know already, and if they do not, neither the ignorant character nor the reader just simply NEED to know. Readers bother to continue reading only, if the begining will trap them into wanting to know what happens and if they both like and above all, get involved with the character... essential list of facts WILL NOT do that. And list offantastically lovely end results glorifying all the results will also make the reader colse the book before the pages aka waist of perfectly good paper ends.
Glorification of end results in repetivimanner and far far too lenghtly is infuriatingly BORING. Atleast this was not a 'non-story' per se as much as they often turn out like, you know, where nothing likes of conflict ever gets described to detail by events each not really shownig strugle or changes of failure of goal or temporary failures on the way, but these encyclopedia + peaceful agenda propagandistic style writing, like out of a bad text book, which barely mentions some challenge, opposition or such and smooths it out by barely namig it was solved likely in some unbelievably peaceful a manner. Sincerely, still sounds like AI when it goes on and on as if not realizing italready ended and focuses on self evident lists ofhowsomething got to beall amazingly right or someentities became oh so famous. Influential... who cares. It is oftenadvised that a writer, especiallyon caring too much about getting reader fully up to speed, should coldly clip off entire firstpage to full chapter depending on how long their unnecessary info dump lasts having even no logical reason fit to the actual narrative toget discussed at all in thebegining because set characters know already, and if they do not, neither the ignorant character nor the reader just simply NEED to know. Readers bother to continue reading only, if the begining will trap them into wanting to know what happens and if they both like and above all, get involved with the character... essential list of facts WILL NOT do that. And list offantastically lovely end results glorifying all the results will also make the reader colse the book before the pages aka waist of perfectly good paper ends.