IMPEACHMENT...Ayaw Mag Oath, Impeachable Offense??
Вставка
- Опубліковано 25 лис 2024
- IMPEACHMENT...Ayaw Mag Oath Impeachable Offense?? #LawyerExplains #AttorNEIL
DISCLAIMER:
My posts are purely for educational purposes and are not legal advice. If you need legal advice, please contact a lawyer directly.
#LIKE #SHARE #FOLLOW #COMMENT for more Legal Videos!
#VPSara #VPSaraDuterte #VPDuterte #SaraDuterte
#Impeachment
#ImpeachmentProcedure
#ImpeachmentTrial
#PoliticalLaw
#ConstitutionalLaw
#legaladviceph
#legaladvice
#legaltips
#legaltipsph
#legalconsultation
#legalconsultationph
Clarification para klaro.
1. Personally, hindi ako naniniwala na impeachable offense ang pag refuse sa pag take oath.
2. Ang may final say kung impeachable offense ba talaga yun is ang HOR pag 1/3 sa kanila ay boboto in favor na impeachable offense nga yun.
3. Therefore, ang personal opinion ko would not matter pag pagbotohan na yan at ma approve ng HOR.
4. Hindi ko kinakampihan ang HOR dito, ineexplain ko lang ang procedure ng impeachment provided by the constitution and decided cases by the SC.
Well para din klaro dahil ibinalik mo sa HOR ang bola at di mo sinagot directly yung mismong tanong mo, Saan ngayon sa mga nabanggit mong grounds pumasok yung act ni VP Sarah?
@@Egon_9182Exactly!
Pinaka Ka grounds politics inggit Banta sa mga nangarap maging presidente kaya pilit Ng pilayan si Sara Yan Ang totoo nagbato sila Ng marumi akala naman Silay malinis
Very well explained atty. Atleast meron naliwanagan paano mangyayare kung meron impeachment ....thank you atty.
Thanks Atty Neil...
Wala sa rules po yan atty ang pag take oath sa resources person sa hor.. kung sa supreme court merong cguro.. atty po yan si sarah at alam niya pinag aralan niya before po siya nag insist mag refuse to take oath
Tamalang hindi mag take oath lalona May nakahalong NPA sa congress🤬🤬🤬
The HOR can do everything they want whether it is an impeachable offense or not, Pag di ka kaalyado!
Bribery bakit hnd ps na impeach c romualdez dba my heavy luggage sya issue ng okada
Dapat tlga ma abolish na itong HOR karamihan nman dyan pamumulitika lang ang rason. Wla n tlga ang Pinas. Kawawang Juan dela Cruz.
Thank you po attorney .
Nasa rules nila atty. na ang witness lang ang entitled to take an oath and not a resource person and VP SARAH is a resource person according to their proceedings therefore VP Sarah has the right to refuse.
Otot mo problema mo
@@samdim3746hindi un isa kaya nga sinabi ni vp sarah kasi nasa rules un..lawyer si vp kaya alam niya
@@samdim3746 Wala yata sa rules nila na ang witness and resource person ay iisa lang!?
Halata naman walang mga abogado sa kanila ..walang alam sa batas. Paano magpka pareha ang witness at resource person. Malaking pagkaka iba yon ayon sa Supreme court..
Hi atty, I’m your new subscriber I like the way you explain in every situation
Honestly speaking, the law has too many branches meaning its always debatable becoz of various or different interpretations.
Atty. ginagawa na nilang Supreme Court ang Kamara😂 ayan ang nangyayari if ang tao bumuto ng artista at sikat na walang alam sa batas nagiging joke.
@@samdim3746or …, “HUWAD” committee.
Which means subject for trial by publicity... It's very crystal clear that those violation were orchestrated under the house of represent a thieves. Crocs gone wild.
Paubaya nalang na atin sa mga Crocs
May credibility ba yang House of RepresentaTHIEVES? Sila sila nga ang nakikitaan ng mga tao na halagang miyons and bilyons ang mga suot nilang relo, gown at alahas and yung kay Abante worth 18M na Cadillac na sasakyan? For me sila ang nagwawaldas ng budget
So its all political‼️
Parang number games ito at hindi na nagma.matter masyado ang legalities.
Kung may numero ang HoR (which is very obvious kc politically kalaban nila si Sara) ay masimulan tlga nila ang impeachment.
...kaya lng may Senado pa palang pgdadaanan.
So kailangan ni Sara ang numero sa Senado coming election 2025.
Good observation.
Bat pa pala tayo nagkakaroon ng eleksyon kung ang HoR ay may absolute power pagdating sa impeachment?. Sila nalang mag elect ng VP at President total lahat naman yan politika. Makatipid pa tayo sa pondo. Sila na rin nagbubudget, sila naman nag aaprove ng lahat. Honorable naman lahat sa HoR hindi naman masunod yung bumoto na taong bayan.
May logic po kayo maam… nakakagigil ang congress ngayon
Good observation.
@@gubs_siramsana Oo nga nman👍👍👍.
Sana may mabago sa sistemang to.🤔🧐
Pero kahit political issue po, hindi parin masupersede sa HOR ang grounds given in the Constitution. Why should SC wash it's hands when the issue is a matter of Constitutionality? Mayroon ba power ang HOR to add anything in the Constitution as regards this or other matters other than what are clearly stipulated or defined po? Can SC redefine or be selective in doing it's mandate?
Kung pagbobotohan ng hor yan ay sigurado impeachable yan kasi ang hor almost 90% hawak ni HS na kalaban ni VP.
paanu nman yung mga congress? kasi sa ngaun sila na mismo ang lumalabag sa mga batas at karamihan dyan mga crocs.
True
10years nalang magiging atty, narin ako dahil sa channel na ito, hehehe
35million na bumoto impeach lng ng mga iilang huwadcom?WTF
Dapat ang ma impeach ay ang Pangulong Marcos at si House Speaker, akala nila sila na ang nagmamay-ari ng Plipinas
si BBM kaya pwedw eh impeach binudol kami
Ang vangag ni BabyM noh 😅
😂😂😂 dami ko tawa
😂😂😂😂 wag ka'ng mag alala marami tayong nabudol.
Dapat ang ma impeach si Romualdez at si Bongbong
New subscriber po atty.
Mababaw n dahilan yan para sa Impeachment......
Nasa rules ng hor a resource person will not take oath
Hello Po atty.new subscriber po
Hi Atty. So si PBBM pwedeng i-impeach on the grounds of GRAFT & CORRPUTION PLUS BETRAYAL OF PUBLIC TRUST, for the numerous issues involving his involvement in dr*gs and failure regarding the flood control? or do these need to be proven in court or HOR or Senate level lang? and does he still enjoy immunity being the President of the Philippine?
Abolish HoR 🦾
Kung numbers game lang ang basehan para saan pa ang grounds for impeachment? Kaya may grounds of impeachment para ma determine if impeachable offense yung hindi nya pag oath eh. Eh hindi naman pumatak ni isa sa mga impeachable grounds yung ginawa nya as vp only followed what the committee rules na witness lang mag oath wala naka saad sa rules na pati resource persons are need to take oath.
Kung numbers games anytime if super majority sila they can file impeachment complaint kahit wala grounds but ofcourse kung wala probable cause at wala nag fall sa grounds eh mamamatay din yung complaint.
So i think hindi siya numbers game based parin sa grounds of impeachment.. magiging numbers game lang pag nag fall na sa grounds of impeachment then botohan na
Hindi naman probable cause hinahanap ng Constitution when it comes to impeachment. An impeachment proceeding is not for purposes of imposing a criminal, civil or admin liability, but merely for the removal from office of an impeachable officer. That is the decision of the SC in a case involving former CJ Corona filed by his widow.
Lastly, even if sabihin ng Committee on Justice na walang sufficient basis, pwede ioverturn ang committee report by 1/3 vote of all members of the HOR since the Plenary power of Congress is absolute.
@@attorneil So kahit sabihin na wala basis kasi wala naman nag fall sa grounds of impeachment kaya ma overturn dahil sa boto lang? Bakit pa ginawa yung grounds of impeachment? Parang waste of time and money dahil gusto lang ng 1/3 of congress na politically harass an impeachable officer eh kaya nila so power trip tlaga ang congress.. at attorney pag nag trip na sila mang impeach ng impeachable officer, pera ba ng bayan ang gagamitin para simulan ang proceedings?
hinde impeachable offense kasi dumulog siya as a 'resource person'. baguhin muna nila ang rules of HOR tungkol dyan that clearly says pwedeng hinde mag oath ang resource person.. - ctto
Nasa mga kamay ng mga xongresmen ang lahat na yan. Siguro na mailcpeach
Everything happens for a reason.
Amoy tambaloslos😅😂😂
Paano masasama sa grounds yung hindi pag oath ni vp sara? Ang sabi kasi sa rule ng hor na witness lang ang pwedeng mag oath at hindi resource person.
So ang nakakabahala pla sa kasong ito baka,,,kumiling din anv mga senador at kumampi sa mga Crocs?
ehh atty...kamusta naman po ang presidente natin di po ba impeachable syang lalo...just asking
Atty mag debate kayo ni atty libayan dahil sa kanya d Yan pasok sa impeachment yong d pag oath
Korek korek korek....natumbok mo lods.. 😂😂😂😂😂..NAPASUBO SI TORNEY....😂😂😂
Wala naman ako sinabi na automatic impeachable offense agad siya.
Ang sabi ko, based on decided cases ng SC at Constitution, pag ma-approve ng 1/3 ng all members ng HOR lahat ng nilagay nila, considered an impeachable offense na yun.
At the end of the day, hindi ako or ibang private practicing attorney ang may power to determine what is an impeachable offense, HOR ang may power nun.
hello sir.. pwede po ba mag tanong? anu po ba ang sanctions ng HOR pag na prove na may abuse of discretion.. ? pwede po bang makulong yung mga members ng quadcom .. or minor disciplinary actions lang? thank you atty? God bless
C pbbm dapat dyan sa impeachment
Nagmagaling si erwin tulfo
Ang tanong po, may convicted guilty sa case na kidnapping na representative pero laya pa rin, bakit ganun?ano po paliwanag sa tanong na ito🤔,pasagot naman po , salamat po
Most likely naka appeal pa ang kaso, therefore wala pang finality ang judgment of conviction.
@@attorneilSabi ni vp Sara convicted na kaya nga Hindi sya makapaniwala na kaharap nila at nagtatanong sa kanya.
May immunity Yan c Castro Kasi andyan pa sa congress..pag Wala puede nang ikulong Yan.
Yan
Bakit hnd mo binanggit ang reason kung bkt hnd nag.oath c vp sara??? un po sana ang ineexplain ninyo kung impeachable b ung hnd nya pagtake ng oath na wala nmn sa rules ng commitee na magtake ng oath ung resourcce person...
Si atty libayan lang po ang nakaka explain nang maayos niyan... ehhehehehe...
Mag kano bigayan
Sorry Atty but in your other video, you said that VP's refusal to take oath as a resource person was just righteous based on the rules of the HOR. It doesn't make sense why you think now that her refusal to take oath as a resource person "could be a cause of impechment (depeding on the congressmen's votes)" if based on HOR's rules it was never a violation. That, even to us ordinary people, would appear so clearly unconstitutional. Voting for what? To suddenly turn a not violating act into a violation. Napakalinaw na panloloko niyan. Papanigan po ba ng batas natin ang panloloko?
👍👍👍
pinapanigan po depende sa bayad 😂 example na lang po ung heavy luggage issue po, per storytellers, kamasa daw po SC sa nabribe 🤔 ok lang po sa kanila maging kahiyahiya ang pinas sa ngalan ng pera.. OA na kagahaman yan
That is a good point of view.
Do take note that I personally do not consider the refusal to take an oath as an impeachable offense.
However, my personal opinion wouldn't matter if 1/3 of the HOR will vote in favor of it since that act of the HOR, according to SC in the case I mentioned, is a political question. Thus, even if we don't agree, we cannot question it in court.
That's why I emphasized that despite the SC directive regarding the substantive aspect on what constitutes an impeachable offense is a political question, a concerned citizen still has another remedy, and that is by guarding and making sure that the procedure provided by the constitution was fully complied with.
Just an addition, the case I cited was a 2003 case. The Justices sitting in the SC now are different from the ones sitting in 2003, thus, there is a chance that if we do reach that point of impeachment, then the SC can decide towards another direction in relation to the issue of "what constitutes an impeachable offense".
@@attorneil Thank you, Atty. However it's still so sad that it appears these lawmakers wouldn't be accountable for taking such action. Kasi it's a clear scam yung mangyayare at taong bayan ang ini-scam nila. Malinaw na panggagago iyan.
Pano pag nag disagree ang senate?
Ang Senate ang may final say since sila ang magiging trial court. If hindi 2/3 of all Senators ang mag vote in favor, walang impeachment na mangyayari.
Paano mag disagree ang Senate. Meron isa dyan hungry for power. Assuming Sara is impeached - sino ba papalit? Dream come true na nya. Sara is right in the end. Everything is being orchestrated. If you look closely mismo sila mga taga Congress di nag follow ng rules nila.
Lagi naman pasok sa congress yan dahil 99 out of 100 boto dyan ...taugan ba naman lahat e
Lawyer polpol
pero sabi mo dun sa isang video mo Atty na tama ang ginawa ng VP na hindi pag oath dahil wala silang specific na rules sa congress na ganun?
Yes, pero tulad ng inexplain ko sa video, if 1/3 ng HOR mag vote in favor na "impeachable offense" yun, wala tayo magagawa since na sa kanila ang power as provided by the Constitution.
LOL
Atty nasa rules namanpo nila eh na ang witness lang ang mag take ng oath. Pero nagbigay naman ng example si GMA yung sinabi ni Senator Miriam. Tsaka alam ng taumbayan na possible at malaki chance na makaka kuha talaga nga 1/3 yan na vote sa Congress mga tao yun ni tambaloslos eh! Kaya ang kailangan bantayan ng taumbayan ang sobra nilang pamumulitika kasi yun ang maliwanag .
Napasubo kah torney sa mga tanong..?? 😂😂😂😂😂
Hindi naman.
Sir it is not about sanction or punishment to an offense but rather of what hor house rule stipulate. U are making issue out of context.
I never said tama ang HOR in relation to witnesses vs resource person as to the oath issue, as a matter of fact, I actually favored with VP Sara's refusal as I have thoroughly explained in my previous video.
In this vide, the issue is what constitutes an "impeachable offense", and the answer to that is if 1/3 of the HOR votes in favor that a certain act is an impeachable offense, then that is considered an impeachable offense regardless of my opinion since that is the power given to the HOR by the Constitution.
Atty. Kapag nasa senate na, di ba magkaka-hearing? Sino ang lalabas na judge?
Yes, lahat sa Senate maging judge. Sila ang magiging trial court.
Hindi ako abugado atty., anong silbi ng sinasabi ng cons about the grounds for impeachment kung congress lng pala ang may discretion to determine what constitute its meaning? Wow!
Parang may mali kayo Atty...ang ndi pag auth ni VP Sarah ay ndi po required ksi isa po syang Resource Person at ndi po witness
Plunder Muna Para no bail sunod MALVERSATION of fund
my nalalaman kapang impeachment.c castro nga na convicted bakit d nakakulong.cge anu masabi mo kasi abogado ka