I do not know whether I can go to Delhi or not in my life time. But this man in grey is a fading gem. He should be preserved. Like the way he explains the things It's beyond any remark. This is from West Begnal. Sir take love 🎉 and Anand Prakash sir is also another gem. If I could deal of their stagnancy in exchange of anything.#mephistopheles
This lecture is misguiding and very subjective... The lecturer gives statements and opinions without any facts. Whilst it is true that the Modernist movement is controversial, in its core lies the concept of a look into our inner world, rather than the outer one - a world which until then was masked by unquestionable dogmas and rules. What one felt, what one did, was seen through the lens of religion, of good and evil. Human behavior, therefore, was rigidly classified as either good or evil, without a grey area of any kind. The man-governed world, which was firstly created through mythology and then indoctrinated by religions, was now collapsing. Freud's psychoanalysis turned the attention from the external world which is conceptually governed by god, to the internal world which in fact governs our lives - our consciousness, our choices and values, our thoughts and emotions. I completely disagree with Barthes' 'Death of the Author', but I do acknowledge that attention must be paid to texts, their structure, form, figurative and narrative techniques, but of course, the author cannot be simply disregarded. In addition, stating that Nietzsche's 'the death of God' concept simply meant that 'god has abandoned us' is way too vague and misleading. I am not his supporter, but I believe he posed some fundamental issues that until then society turned a blind eye to.
The first sentence of your comment seems to be affected by prejudice of self-praising. It means you are trying to grab the attention of viewers that is why you wrote a comment against the lecturer. One more thing that i would like to attend your attention i.e, you started your comment from criticizing him that shows your ignorance and incapibility to comprehend the thing. You like to learn not analyze the thing. That shows your level of understanding.
He sgares his education and experience with regard to modern movement ,he has documented fact in his history books with due references,yes ,blind religiosity too is anti science and reason ,we should respond to criticism clearly and reasonably and avoid indulging in mutual recrimination,at this age he makes efforts to accord first hand knowledge about a turbulent,less discussed age , notorious for wars 🙏🙏.
Slow, repetitive, mechanical, uninspiring, juvenile, parochial, disconnected. Can't understand all the praise. This guy didn't do ANY justice to this awesome topic. Get someone with knowledge and real scholarship.
I do not know whether I can go to Delhi or not in my life time. But this man in grey is a fading gem. He should be preserved. Like the way he explains the things It's beyond any remark. This is from West Begnal. Sir take love 🎉 and Anand Prakash sir is also another gem. If I could deal of their stagnancy in exchange of anything.#mephistopheles
Great summary of history of English literature
A lecture fantastically arranged is really worth-listening. Abundance thanks to you sir! from Pakistan
Inka B.A Hamari PHD
Thank you for providing these lectures... God bless.
I Really enjoyed these Sessions!
A lecture worth remembering the whole. Attractive presentation.
Literature is beautifully designed with history
thank you this is just absolute gold! THANK YOU from Germany :)))
Bundle of thanks and respect for you sir
Very significant lecture.
❤❤❤ Simple & Innocent manner
Wish to have lectures on Masculinity Studies
How can I get his new history of english literature. I am from Pakistan.
Excellent speech Sir🙏🙏
You are the best
Thanks for modernist movement
Nice literature. 👌👌
What Is that name of the woman author who remarked on the 1st world war
Willa Cather
Greetings from Sindh
Thanks
Series is very useful
Prof Dahiya is an institution in himself.
Good👍
good
i no longer unstand to modern philosophic thinking?
In abroad nhi hota hai ma'am
You noticed that!
@@binukj7970 yes
Where are you from ?
Can be listend at the speed of 2
This lecture is misguiding and very subjective... The lecturer gives statements and opinions without any facts. Whilst it is true that the Modernist movement is controversial, in its core lies the concept of a look into our inner world, rather than the outer one - a world which until then was masked by unquestionable dogmas and rules. What one felt, what one did, was seen through the lens of religion, of good and evil. Human behavior, therefore, was rigidly classified as either good or evil, without a grey area of any kind.
The man-governed world, which was firstly created through mythology and then indoctrinated by religions, was now collapsing. Freud's psychoanalysis turned the attention from the external world which is conceptually governed by god, to the internal world which in fact governs our lives - our consciousness, our choices and values, our thoughts and emotions.
I completely disagree with Barthes' 'Death of the Author', but I do acknowledge that attention must be paid to texts, their structure, form, figurative and narrative techniques, but of course, the author cannot be simply disregarded. In addition, stating that Nietzsche's 'the death of God' concept simply meant that 'god has abandoned us' is way too vague and misleading. I am not his supporter, but I believe he posed some fundamental issues that until then society turned a blind eye to.
IT IS NOT WISE TO SAY THAT HE IS MISLEADING. BUT I AGREE WITH YOUR OBSERVATIONS MENTIONED IN LATER PART
The first sentence of your comment seems to be affected by prejudice of self-praising. It means you are trying to grab the attention of viewers that is why you wrote a comment against the lecturer.
One more thing that i would like to attend your attention i.e, you started your comment from criticizing him that shows your ignorance and incapibility to comprehend the thing. You like to learn not analyze the thing. That shows your level of understanding.
@@tinkuverma1846 but is she (tania) right? Or not?
He sgares his education and experience with regard to modern movement ,he has documented fact in his history books with due references,yes ,blind religiosity too is anti science and reason ,we should respond to criticism clearly and reasonably and avoid indulging in mutual recrimination,at this age he makes efforts to accord first hand knowledge about a turbulent,less discussed age , notorious for wars 🙏🙏.
Slow, repetitive, mechanical, uninspiring, juvenile, parochial, disconnected.
Can't understand all the praise.
This guy didn't do ANY justice to this awesome topic.
Get someone with knowledge and real scholarship.