Group and Abelian Group

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 11 гру 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 104

  • @bilaljan321
    @bilaljan321 2 роки тому +72

    Home work question given at 10:13 is not a group as 3 + (-3) = 0 and 0 is not the Z'. So its not closed with addition operation.

    • @tesfayeyisahak
      @tesfayeyisahak 10 місяців тому +6

      -3 first of all is not in the set of z+, of course it satisfies closurity property, but the reason that it is not a group is because It does'nt have an identity element and inverse just as (N, +).

    • @niggachunibyo
      @niggachunibyo 9 місяців тому

      @@tesfayeyisahak

    • @18fatima15
      @18fatima15 8 місяців тому +8

      @@tesfayeyisahak the set used in the HW ques is Z* and not Z+ .

  • @123arskas
    @123arskas 2 роки тому +30

    Beautifully explained with such a direct approach. Loved it.

  • @luckieboy_logee
    @luckieboy_logee 2 роки тому +28

    Beautiful explanation ...In Closure property ,5-2=3

  • @NishithSavla
    @NishithSavla 2 роки тому +14

    Thanks a lot for this explanation. It was all going over my head while learning vector space. Now I'll be able to understand it all.

    • @shakirashaikh
      @shakirashaikh 2 роки тому +1

      then teach us vector spaces too @nishith sir please :)

    • @NishithSavla
      @NishithSavla 2 роки тому

      ​@@shakirashaikh Now, you've seen the same video and hence you can understand vector spaces yourself ma'am.

  • @ocular4755
    @ocular4755 2 місяці тому +3

    insanely good explanation

  • @valeriereid2337
    @valeriereid2337 2 місяці тому +1

    You did a fantastic job with this topic. Thank you.

  • @erolakkas6410
    @erolakkas6410 Рік тому +1

    Really smooth explanation. Understood with just one watch. 🥇🏆🏅

  • @photolab6712
    @photolab6712 5 місяців тому +1

    For the 1st time I understood this topic very well

  • @Sammie554
    @Sammie554 2 місяці тому +1

    Thankyouu so much sir for that cain short cut ❤ the whole video is amazing

  • @williesanape3900
    @williesanape3900 2 роки тому +7

    Very clearly explained, thanks so much!

  • @MdHumayun-pm2kp
    @MdHumayun-pm2kp 3 роки тому +22

    At 6:14, 5-2 must be +3

    • @asadahmed597
      @asadahmed597 2 роки тому +2

      Yes you are right it should be +3

  • @Chuyaxz
    @Chuyaxz Рік тому +2

    6:09 it should be 3 not -3. But it is good and comprehensible presentation 👏👏

  • @donthusravya2026
    @donthusravya2026 3 роки тому +5

    Sir your videos are really intelligible and I liked them very much .Could u please upload the videos in a faster rate? I am so eager to learn the whole subject

  • @denishnatiuk921
    @denishnatiuk921 Місяць тому

    very intuitive explaination

  • @shubhratbro7362
    @shubhratbro7362 2 роки тому +2

    Excellently explained ❤️

  • @shikha7873
    @shikha7873 Рік тому

    ❤❤❤ your explanation is excellent

  • @simpleandminimalmaybe
    @simpleandminimalmaybe Рік тому +1

    very well explained. thank you for all the help.

  • @nightmare399
    @nightmare399 6 місяців тому

    and i want more videos from you with fields odered fields because those are the concepts i am stuck with

  • @apsarakarunarathna9668
    @apsarakarunarathna9668 22 дні тому

    This is great... thankyou

  • @Sravani-n9r
    @Sravani-n9r 9 місяців тому

    Nice explanation sir

  • @ramashukla541
    @ramashukla541 Рік тому

    Wonderful explanation 😊

  • @himanshitangariya1275
    @himanshitangariya1275 Рік тому +1

    THANK YOU SIR❤

  • @DumolwenkosiVhumbunu
    @DumolwenkosiVhumbunu 6 місяців тому

    That was helpful...do one for binary operations

  • @AlessandroZir
    @AlessandroZir 2 роки тому +1

    very clear and useful!! many thanks; ❤️

  • @mohamedaminenadiri2853
    @mohamedaminenadiri2853 Рік тому

    thank you or this lovely explanation

  • @ExploringWorld100
    @ExploringWorld100 2 роки тому

    Excellent explained

  • @MohaMohamoud-r2d
    @MohaMohamoud-r2d Рік тому

    thank you so much it was an amazing explanation

  • @saeedsharif2463
    @saeedsharif2463 2 роки тому +1

    Sir the result of associative and commutave must be their in group or just need to get RHS=LHS

    • @Cartidise
      @Cartidise Рік тому

      we need to get just RHS=LHS

  • @sarithachavatapalli1560
    @sarithachavatapalli1560 2 роки тому

    Excellent sir very useful

  • @adhityaadhi9107
    @adhityaadhi9107 11 місяців тому +1

    Sir in closure property a=5 ,b=-2 then it is 3 not -3 sir...

  • @EdrisKhan-w1u
    @EdrisKhan-w1u Рік тому

    Thanks a lot 🎉

  • @farmygaming9609
    @farmygaming9609 Рік тому +1

    homework question , initially , + is not binary operation on Z*

  • @adithibhat7277
    @adithibhat7277 Рік тому

    i love this. Thank you so much

  • @aswanthajay3034
    @aswanthajay3034 2 роки тому +5

    Sir, 5+(-2) = 3 ...

  • @aayrakumari7816
    @aayrakumari7816 2 роки тому

    Thank u so so much sir ♥️♥️♥️♥️

  • @anishaa3557
    @anishaa3557 2 роки тому

    Sir...N is not a group under addition and multiplication ...is it correct

  • @genjishimada3767
    @genjishimada3767 Рік тому

    Love you very clear uni explanation terrible yours good

  • @mahadihassanriyadh
    @mahadihassanriyadh 4 місяці тому

    damn, too good presentation & explanation man, please keep up the good work.

  • @gursheenkaur9586
    @gursheenkaur9586 Рік тому +2

    i feel like teacher is not same as in c programming and preposition logic

  • @nehachhetri7115
    @nehachhetri7115 3 роки тому

    Thank you so much sir!!!☺️

  • @nightmare399
    @nightmare399 6 місяців тому

    yeah bro thanks according to me the question you gave at last is z(binary operation), +) is it a group
    soln (according to me i think it is right)
    CAIN - closure - yes a,b (belongs to )P a*b (belongs to )P yes
    associative subtraction is not associative so i stopped here it self so it is not an group that's all !

  • @arnavsrivastava7763
    @arnavsrivastava7763 2 роки тому

    how is 5+(-2)=-3??? {at 6:02}

  • @aakashjason803
    @aakashjason803 Рік тому +2

    Hw answer
    Z+ --> set of positive integers
    Identity -->0 ( identity elmt in addition)
    Consider inverse property..
    Since z+ consists of all positive integers, obviously sum of any two elements won't give identity elmt 0. So each element in z+ does not have a corresponding inverse ---> violation of CAIN ---> hence { Z+ , +} not a group

  • @shaiksameer1890
    @shaiksameer1890 Рік тому

    Thanks sir

  • @kvenkataraju
    @kvenkataraju Рік тому +1

    (Z*, +) is not a group as it does not satisfy inverse.

  • @sravanthikumarapu4640
    @sravanthikumarapu4640 Рік тому

    it was just excellent

  • @stacydevries4241
    @stacydevries4241 11 місяців тому +1

    (z*,+) is not a group because no 0 exists, eliminating the identity criteria.

  • @kalpalatha4463
    @kalpalatha4463 Рік тому +1

    Hi
    Z+ means positive integers know bro
    I hope

  • @VivekSingh-vs2ex
    @VivekSingh-vs2ex 2 роки тому

    Thankyou ❤️

  • @selvamathik8982
    @selvamathik8982 Рік тому

    Please put videos for subgroup and normal subgroup

  • @ayesharanijahangeerkhan210
    @ayesharanijahangeerkhan210 Рік тому

    Thanku sir

  • @rajeshprajapati4863
    @rajeshprajapati4863 2 роки тому +33

    Answer to H.W :
    Z* = {... -3, -2, -1, 1, 2, 3 ...} under Addition.
    Closure => Any Two Numbers : -1, 1 ∈ Z* but -1 + 1 = 0 ∉ Z*
    Since, one of the property out of CAIN is not satisfied. Hence, (Z*, +) is not Group. Right ?

    • @Anonyymous818
      @Anonyymous818 Рік тому +2

      Z is denoted as an integer and an integer is a set of positive and negative numbers including 0 hence Z,+ is satisfied and it is an abelian group

    • @koolkoolkoopa
      @koolkoolkoopa Рік тому +2

      @@Anonyymous818 Careful, that Z* is all integets but 0. Doesn't satisfy.

    • @VikashYadav0067
      @VikashYadav0067 Рік тому +1

      yup it's not a group but a semi group cuz it satisfies closure and associative property.

  • @mohdazeem3260
    @mohdazeem3260 3 роки тому

    Thanku a lot sir

  • @ankitsajwan6685
    @ankitsajwan6685 2 роки тому

    Thankyou

  • @aayrakumari7816
    @aayrakumari7816 2 роки тому

    Thank u....

  • @tiny_jam7897
    @tiny_jam7897 2 роки тому

    Where did 5 in closure came from??

  • @S.Vanlalchhana
    @S.Vanlalchhana 2 роки тому +1

    Sir, can you please solve this problem Prove that G is a abelian if b^{-1}a^{-1}ba=e for all a, b€G

  • @JaySE_25
    @JaySE_25 Рік тому

    O thank you!

  • @NFECTUS1
    @NFECTUS1 2 роки тому +57

    (Z*,+) is not a group

    • @omkar6649
      @omkar6649 Рік тому +4

      It's a ring

    • @A-ONE991
      @A-ONE991 Рік тому +9

      Yes because inverse element is not exist in z+

    • @Shoya_Ishida_69
      @Shoya_Ishida_69 Рік тому +3

      ​@@A-ONE991doesn't*

    • @gulzerhossen9608
      @gulzerhossen9608 9 місяців тому +1

      ​@@omkar6649😂

    • @rihanawab7438
      @rihanawab7438 8 місяців тому +4

      It's a group
      Because
      0 is the identity element for addition we are not talking about whether it is belongs to integers or not.
      And same as for 1.
      Yes when it comes to multiplication then it's not a group.

  • @pittakumar2612
    @pittakumar2612 Рік тому

    Sir always we take identity element is zero

  • @mihirmathur5855
    @mihirmathur5855 2 роки тому

    No, it is not a group since closure property not satisfied

  • @Hans_Magnusson
    @Hans_Magnusson Рік тому

    Sorry lads but I haven’t got the patience!
    Y’all gotta find someone else

  • @asjedits2311
    @asjedits2311 2 роки тому +24

    (Z* +) is not a group sir

    • @NoobROHIT20
      @NoobROHIT20 2 роки тому

      How

    • @michaellee7933
      @michaellee7933 2 роки тому +1

      @@NoobROHIT20 i believe it failed the inverse and identity element

    • @xinpingdonohoe3978
      @xinpingdonohoe3978 Рік тому +1

      @@michaellee7933 it fails all except associativity.
      a+(-a)=0, but 0 is not in the group and hence can't act as an identity, meaning that there is nowhere for an inverse to map to.
      This means it's not closed, it's got no identity and from having no identity can have no inverses.

    • @comradenikolatesla1998
      @comradenikolatesla1998 Рік тому

      @@xinpingdonohoe3978 how 0 is not in Z

    • @xinpingdonohoe3978
      @xinpingdonohoe3978 Рік тому +1

      @@comradenikolatesla1998
      The set Z* is defined as Z\{0}

  • @IslombekNematov-f5s
    @IslombekNematov-f5s Рік тому

    ❤❤❤

  • @MarionBesterMaganga
    @MarionBesterMaganga 9 місяців тому

    it is not a group since there is no identity element which is zero in that set

  • @bennyhood9122
    @bennyhood9122 Рік тому

    Eduphile??

  • @pinkysingh6147
    @pinkysingh6147 2 роки тому

    verryyyy nice

  • @harshitkumawat4987
    @harshitkumawat4987 2 роки тому

    calculation for closure is wrong not -5

  • @MSSSashwathanS
    @MSSSashwathanS Рік тому

    is it me or does he sound like chris griffin ?

  • @tejask6854
    @tejask6854 2 роки тому

    💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥

  • @johnstfleur3987
    @johnstfleur3987 Рік тому

    "L."

  • @tiny_jam7897
    @tiny_jam7897 2 роки тому

    Gulo n'yo naman. Edi hindi group yan?

  • @Sagardeep_Das
    @Sagardeep_Das Рік тому

    No inverse property unsatisfied.

  • @Rohit_Singh7091
    @Rohit_Singh7091 Рік тому

    Very good explanation

  • @IslombekNematov-f5s
    @IslombekNematov-f5s Рік тому

    ❤❤❤

  • @jeevajeeva-c2b
    @jeevajeeva-c2b 9 місяців тому

    (Z+,+) is not a group