1:35 You could walk from where you're standing to where some veterans of the Bulge are buried. My grandfather's brother Sgt. Edward Charnosky was a Purple Heart veteran of the Bulge, and he is buried at Indiantown Gap National Cemetery.
I am a Canadian History buff and I was in Bastogne last June. I drove from Luxembourg through to Bastogne and on through Belgium. Even after 75 years, the roads were narrow, the hills step and the valleys deep. Would have not expected a German assault through there.
Don't you just love how all youtubers are convinced we want SHORTER videos and feel like they have to cut things out to make us happier? I picked this video out of millions of alternatives. I want to see MORE of this shit if you've got it on film. If it's too long to watch in one go, I'll PAUSE the fucker and come back later.
TheLegendOf Arthur Absolutely! I enjoy all the effort they put into their background info and “sketches” and stuff, but I don’t think they grasp that we’re here fore and full most for an actual gaming battle report.
Good Show love "Chain of Command" and will be interested to see the comparison of CoC and "Disposable Heroes" . The attack on Foy is only one of the many things that Ambrose misrepresented in his book.
To understand where the name 'Two Fat Lardies' comes from, check out the old UK cookery show 'Two Fat Ladies'. Similarly, 'I ain't been shot mum' derives from the UK WW2 sitcom set in Burma 'It ain't half hot, mum'. They're all references to popular UK TV shows.
Found this channel the other night and I'm pretty excited on what I've seen so far. I like the variety of the games being played, Cold Wars interviews and even the rules review. As a big fan of Chain or Command, I especially enjoyed this video. I'm actually pleased with the format of the game play. I can follow on the game flow as I've played many of the game. Some folks who are not as savvy may want to see more of the game mechanic explained and/or played out. I like the cut ins with the players explain their vision, hopes and realities of their decision and how the game unfolded. One item I would recommend is showing what the force composition were. Example would be the American Airborne guys...from out of the core rule set, or a modified organization for this particular scenario? The German force structure - again out of the core rule booklet? What about the armor and the 88 Flak gun...which player controlled that team? Was there any special movement rules for moving through the snow and what about weather? These are just a few elements I think would add more to your video. I do have a few other questions; were the two forces balance out with the force morale points? What additional support options were bought...if any? Where can I find a copy of the order of battler you guys used? I would like to re-create the game you guys ran. Thanks and looking forward to your past and future vids. Oh...last thing I really enjoy this channel as you guys speak American English!!!
Thanks for the feedback. We could do a better job explaining force compositions in our videos, yes. That's an excellent suggestion and one we will keep in mind. But if you want to see the exact scenario we played, all the scenarios are available for free on our website under the "Free Stuff" page. Take about 10 seconds to sign up for it and then you get all the free downloads, bonus videos, behind the scenes stuff, etc.
Nice video. Speirs only was called in AFTER the Easy assault was bogged down and he went in with the final reserves (in the form of cooks, typists etc...). The battle actually lasted for 18 hours. The 88mm was a Pak 43, not a Flak 36. ;) Also, US communications were ordered radio silence because the mortar detachment suddenly got orders to STOP firing. After they sent a runner to Sink, he quickly realised their communications were compromised, making the assault an even bigger shitstorm. However, Dike being shot is nothing more than a rumor. I've heard it as well, but several veterans mentioned he just broke down and had to be replaced, the breaking down due to ... well, alot of the above. But again, a very nice and enjoyable video!
Yes I always felt that the treatment of Dike was a little unfair and troubled me in what was otherwise a generally thoughtful TV drama. If Dike really did break down, BoB gives a very unsympathetic portrayal of what was quite possibly a man suffering from what was termed 'combat fatigue' or PTSD as we'd call it today. Granted this put his command in extreme danger but the guy can hardly be blamed for a nervous reaction which he had no control over. The man was clearly not a coward, he advanced over an awful piece of open fire-swept ground leading his men pretty much from the front. It takes some guts to even attempt that; a mission which comes close to suicidal. I'm guessing the Germans probably had that area zeroed in too. Perhaps the answer for the scapegoating might be to deflect from the fact that Winters had ordered his men to into a needlessly risky manoeuvre which did not go to plan.
Our Historical group on Tuesday night showed up at Tabletop Hobbies in K.C. Kan. to fight and looking at the table layout and everybody said "FOY" from Band of Brothers ! It was a fun tactical battle which played pretty fast so we had time to change sides and play it twice before we had to go home (store closed and some had to go to work the next say ) !!! :-)
Agreed, a little more gameplay would be ace. Even a few sections illustrating the decisions and mechanics of a squad move, and the mechanics of the incoming fire for instance.
Just found this channel and what an amazing video. Not just a battle report but also a great history lesson. Awesome. I’ve hit the subscribe button and look forward to watching many more of your terrific videos. Regards James from across the pond. Cool Motörhead t shirt too. 🤘🏻
Maybe the Lieutenant got a worse rap than he deserved. As they said, the guy had just seen a hell of a lot of action shortly before Foy. That's alot of stress and you can be tough as nails, but a nail is gonna break if you put too much pressure on it. I think he just finally broke, but he broke at the worst possible time.
Had Capt. Sobel remained in command of Easy Co., this type of attack could very well have been experienced on D-Day itself. I respect Sobel's early training of Easy -- he toughened-up the guys way beyond what the men themselves thought possible -- but dislike his martinet-style leadership style.
If Dike really did fall apart then maybe it was Combat Fatigue? He had been in combat before & done well. It does happen. Other point is who ordered such a crazy direct charge across open ground - in the snow? Nuts methinks!
In a few cases, for a special or unique scenario. But for the most part guys in the club pick armies and eras that interest them generally, then they paint a large number of units for that era, allowing us to play a variety of scenarios.
If Dike failed making this attack, who was the genius who came up with the idea of launching an attack across an open field against a fortified enemy assisted by panzers? I would try maybe a night attack, or screen the attack with smoke, or sneak in along the side of the village, or call in heavy artillery to rubble the village...or almost anything other then what was attempted. Winters certainly beat up on Dike , but was the stupid attack plan thought up by Winters?
Hi guys great presentation. It is interesting that his contemporaries paint him as a coward yet his war record says something to the opposite. I see two possibilities. 1. Everyone has a breaking point no matter how bad ass they are and this was it for him. 2. He had broken a cultural taboo within the company and the results of those infernal politics drives the others to try to destroy his reputation. Statements like "pissed his pants" and others to me sounds like internal politics rather than what really happened. Although you need to play this scenario several times to arrive at the probable outcome the game you played suggests the US forces will stall just short of Foy. I knew commander may have been one way to get a stalled attack going again. That is that the boys will not risk their lives for a commander that they don't trust perhaps because he broke an internal taboo. Injecting a commander that they did trust would explain the sudden come back and the attack is on again. I am not claiming that this actually happened. I am suggesting another angle to consider. This was the first video of yours that I have watched and was very impressed with you presentation.
Thanks, James. Hope you'll watch some more! Both of your Dike explanations are certainly possible. I think a third viable explanation is that he was perhaps unpopular and disliked on a personal level by many of the men in the company. Could have been a simple personality conflict. Whatever the case was, it's an interesting look inside company-level politics.
What a strange idea to assault a town through an open field and not even trying to reach and seize the closest building but run diagonally through a 88 gun line of fire...
I wonder whether the real fault lies with those higher up the chain of command who ordered only a single company to take Foy with minimal support whilst the Germans were supported by tanks and a flack gun. Such an action would warrant a couple of companies, and more artillery and sniper support at least.
Thanks! I am much more a fan of CoC than IABSM, but we've played a number of the Lardies rules in the club over the years, including Sharpe Practice and Charlie Don't Surf.
The sad truth about the US in the war was that our Army commands were unimaginative strategically and coordination between armor and infantry was terrible as a rule. The result was massive percentage of casualties were unnecessary
Great vid. Amazing table and the minis all looked well painted. But I did not get a good sense of the size of the two opposing forces. Maybe next time a little better introduction of the two armies?
I suppose you could say the entire thing was mute as the Germans had zero chance of success winning the Battle of the Bulge. Without fuel, the attack was fated to fail. US fuel depots could not have refueled the German tanks in any reasonable amount of time before counter attacking divisions were showing up. 20/20 hindsight wouldn't change the overall result.
it was for the morale, if they could have splite the allied army in two maybe the half part stuck in the north will have surrender, they were trying to do the same as dunkirke
If we can make the logistics work, I think a few of the clubs from our club would be interested in coming down. We'll touch base with you to discuss it! The HAWKs do an incredible job at all the HMGS conventions and you guys always have great looking tabletops.
Just my two cents here. I am a avid wargamer and I find it hard to belive that the german guns would have fired as late as they did. I know from the comments that this was a game system thing. But still that is not how it should work at all. If your in the open and units are in a buliding observing the field then there should be no reason at all they are not firing right then and there.
Each phase represents just a few seconds of action so guns would take time to prepare and fire. Officers and nco's need to get the gun into action, the weather conditions may mean the gun might need de-icing, the ammunition may not have been placed close to the gun and so take time for rounds to be moved, the gunners may need time to get into position after the action begins, the gunners are under fire and trying to keep under cover while operating the gun. There are hundreds of reasons why the gun could be late getting into action especially given the time scale each phase is supposed to represent. Chain of Command are not to everyone's taste but they represent the chaos of action and the difficulties of command very well. There are a plenty of rules that allow players to what they want when they want but Chain of Command isn't one of them. I've been wargaming since the 70s and played loads of WW2 rule sets in that time but CoC is without doubt the best of the lot balancing period feel, in game tactics and fun perfectly.
Biggest blunder? That should fall into either German hands for falling for all those Soviet ruses, or to Japans for not blowing up those fuel depot in Pearl Harbor.
"Captain" Dike..."Lieutenant" Dike. The U.S. Army has posts. The Navy and Air Force have 'bases". You folks still make interesting content, and thanks for that.
3 times the manpower and fire superiority 6:1 the book says otherwise you don't make it. If they got away with it that means Germans with a low morale level which is understandable if you realize the war is all but lost.
I personally believe it was one of, if not, the worst failure's of military intelligence in American military history, but on the German end of things, it was (obviously) initially successful, but in the end, nothing really happened to the German's benefit in the outcome of the war. So I consider it a massive failure. Maybe not Barbarossa levels of failure, but one of their larger blunders during the war for sure (all my opinion).
I found this to be quite entertaining. I believe that there are some valuable history lessons as well as some leadership decision to be learned from these exercises. On the other hand, I was disappointed to hear the repetitive comments deriding a soldier in battle, regardless of the sources quoted. I am not confident that the players depicted in this episode have spent much time in a boxing ring, let alone in combat. They even seem to be a bit stressed over the flow of the game...a game. To besmirch a man who has done in real life what others only experience vicariously is certainly a human frailty in my opinion.
To Keith Stine. You typed and asked me what I was "going on about". Well, it seems clear that you understood, precisely what I wrote, you pitiful fuck. Until I watched this video, I had no idea as to who the Army officer was who is referred to in such a derogatory manner. The comments made by the fantasy warriors did nothing to honor the man's service to our country. The folks depicted in this fantasy video look and act like stereotypical nerds who grab their junk when they think about taking an RPG up their ass. What in the hell has kept you guys from going to get a piece of the current long war...ya know, slots are still available. Go down next week and sign up to be a Grunt. To those among you who have claimed combat experience, not just Cold War service, perhaps you will consider toning down your antics. You should know that criticizing anyone who has actually had their knees in the breeze is beneath you...especially when they are not able to beat your ass in case you are wrong. Yeah, just like you might feel if Hillary Clinton blamed a specific Marine for losing Fallujah the first time...and then laughed about it.
Nice battle report and overall video. Would you like to use Combat Patrol as one of your sets of rules to compare? If so, let me know, and I can send you copy. See www.bucksurdu.com/Buck_Surdu/Combat_Patrol.html and facebook.com/CombatPatrol/?ref=bookmarks
Interesting that your "Allied Military Planners" @114 photo was a grop of US generals only.... But I forget, the US won WW2 all on its own (of course)!
Lt spears is a bad as* he taken over command get the job done with the squad if I had to pick someone who can follow orders and get the job done it’s spears
1:35 You could walk from where you're standing to where some veterans of the Bulge are buried. My grandfather's brother Sgt. Edward Charnosky was a Purple Heart veteran of the Bulge, and he is buried at Indiantown Gap National Cemetery.
I am a Canadian History buff and I was in Bastogne last June. I drove from Luxembourg through to Bastogne and on through Belgium. Even after 75 years, the roads were narrow, the hills step and the valleys deep. Would have not expected a German assault through there.
Would you say you wouldn't have expected it...twice?
enjoyed Steve's humour in this. "I'm going to miss Hans and Gunther," was a classic.
“Bolt Action” could’ve been a good choice as well. It’s a little closer to company level.
We'll be using Bolt Action for a scenario this year on the channel!
Behind Omaha would also be appropriate, but it's more vehicle centred.
“I wish we had more time in this video”. 😂😂😂 if only there were a way you could’ve lengthened it.
Don't you just love how all youtubers are convinced we want SHORTER videos and feel like they have to cut things out to make us happier?
I picked this video out of millions of alternatives. I want to see MORE of this shit if you've got it on film. If it's too long to watch in one go, I'll PAUSE the fucker and come back later.
TheLegendOf Arthur Absolutely! I enjoy all the effort they put into their background info and “sketches” and stuff, but I don’t think they grasp that we’re here fore and full most for an actual gaming battle report.
@Skyler Case But it only took them seconds to hack you!
Good Show love "Chain of Command" and will be interested to see the comparison of CoC and "Disposable Heroes" . The attack on Foy is only one of the many things that Ambrose misrepresented in his book.
History proves Ambrose was highly dishonest
To understand where the name 'Two Fat Lardies' comes from, check out the old UK cookery show 'Two Fat Ladies'. Similarly, 'I ain't been shot mum' derives from the UK WW2 sitcom set in Burma 'It ain't half hot, mum'. They're all references to popular UK TV shows.
“I really hope my kids aren’t watching this,”-Tom
Found this channel the other night and I'm pretty excited on what I've seen so far. I like the variety of the games being played, Cold Wars interviews and even the rules review. As a big fan of Chain or Command, I especially enjoyed this video. I'm actually pleased with the format of the game play. I can follow on the game flow as I've played many of the game. Some folks who are not as savvy may want to see more of the game mechanic explained and/or played out. I like the cut ins with the players explain their vision, hopes and realities of their decision and how the game unfolded. One item I would recommend is showing what the force composition were. Example would be the American Airborne guys...from out of the core rule set, or a modified organization for this particular scenario? The German force structure - again out of the core rule booklet? What about the armor and the 88 Flak gun...which player controlled that team? Was there any special movement rules for moving through the snow and what about weather? These are just a few elements I think would add more to your video. I do have a few other questions; were the two forces balance out with the force morale points? What additional support options were bought...if any? Where can I find a copy of the order of battler you guys used? I would like to re-create the game you guys ran. Thanks and looking forward to your past and future vids. Oh...last thing I really enjoy this channel as you guys speak American English!!!
Thanks for the feedback. We could do a better job explaining force compositions in our videos, yes. That's an excellent suggestion and one we will keep in mind. But if you want to see the exact scenario we played, all the scenarios are available for free on our website under the "Free Stuff" page. Take about 10 seconds to sign up for it and then you get all the free downloads, bonus videos, behind the scenes stuff, etc.
@@LittleWarsTV Awesome! Will do. Thanks.
I loved the “gap”, spent time there attending the NCTC free courses as a CID agent.
Would love to have seen this using Battlegroup by Plastic Soldier Company
Nice video.
Speirs only was called in AFTER the Easy assault was bogged down and he went in with the final reserves (in the form of cooks, typists etc...). The battle actually lasted for 18 hours.
The 88mm was a Pak 43, not a Flak 36. ;)
Also, US communications were ordered radio silence because the mortar detachment suddenly got orders to STOP firing. After they sent a runner to Sink, he quickly realised their communications were compromised, making the assault an even bigger shitstorm. However, Dike being shot is nothing more than a rumor. I've heard it as well, but several veterans mentioned he just broke down and had to be replaced, the breaking down due to ... well, alot of the above.
But again, a very nice and enjoyable video!
All Hero’s in my book really we all have our moments
Military records indicate Dike earned a Purple heart that day!
Yes I always felt that the treatment of Dike was a little unfair and troubled me in what was otherwise a generally thoughtful TV drama. If Dike really did break down, BoB gives a very unsympathetic portrayal of what was quite possibly a man suffering from what was termed 'combat fatigue' or PTSD as we'd call it today. Granted this put his command in extreme danger but the guy can hardly be blamed for a nervous reaction which he had no control over. The man was clearly not a coward, he advanced over an awful piece of open fire-swept ground leading his men pretty much from the front. It takes some guts to even attempt that; a mission which comes close to suicidal. I'm guessing the Germans probably had that area zeroed in too. Perhaps the answer for the scapegoating might be to deflect from the fact that Winters had ordered his men to into a needlessly risky manoeuvre which did not go to plan.
Our Historical group on Tuesday night showed up at Tabletop Hobbies in K.C. Kan. to fight and looking at the table layout and everybody said "FOY" from Band of Brothers ! It was a fun tactical battle which played pretty fast so we had time to change sides and play it twice before we had to go home (store closed and some had to go to work the next say ) !!! :-)
Motorhead T-shirt - hell yeah !! :D
Another great video chaps. If I had one wish it would be a bit more game play in the videos.
Feedback like this is much appreciated! We are certainly interested in ways to make the videos better.
Little Wars TV id like to see a lot more gameplay and maybe make a seprate video on just the game play
Agreed, a little more gameplay would be ace. Even a few sections illustrating the decisions and mechanics of a squad move, and the mechanics of the incoming fire for instance.
Just found this channel and what an amazing video. Not just a battle report but also a great history lesson. Awesome. I’ve hit the subscribe button and look forward to watching many more of your terrific videos. Regards James from across the pond. Cool Motörhead t shirt too. 🤘🏻
1958..additional smoke rounds on the roofs of the buildings, possible incendiary effects, "smoke out" German MG and rifles in cover.
2:34 the tank hasn't smashed the tree ? SOOO anticlimatic XD
Another great video! Love the history lessons as well
“Bugler, Blow Assembly”.... Good Lord, I love this channel!
Honestly these videos would not be worse if they were double the lenght... This feels like a tiny tease at best.
Great video gents, really enjoyed the format!
Great video.
Glad you liked the Gap.
Visit the museum when you get a chance. It's by the modern BLC barracks in preserved ww2 barracks block.
Would like to see a Disposable Heroes 2 gameplay, if possible! There's not a single battle report on UA-cam about that game!
Great video guys! Looking forward to the rules comparisons!!
Great job! I really like your format. Could add a bit more gameplay but it’s still awesome!
Maybe the Lieutenant got a worse rap than he deserved. As they said, the guy had just seen a hell of a lot of action shortly before Foy. That's alot of stress and you can be tough as nails, but a nail is gonna break if you put too much pressure on it. I think he just finally broke, but he broke at the worst possible time.
Great video and awesome miniatures!
The shooting part, totally blocked by youtube ad of next video. I really hate they do that.
I wish I was in your war club it would be a dream to do war games with you guys
This is so much fun I miss playing with my soldiers.
Had Capt. Sobel remained in command of Easy Co., this type of attack could very well have been experienced on D-Day itself. I respect Sobel's early training of Easy -- he toughened-up the guys way beyond what the men themselves thought possible -- but dislike his martinet-style leadership style.
First time I've ever watched one of these board games quite interesting I'm a ww1 ww2 modeler myself
Love that winter table
also, been a table top figure war gamer for years....
Very enjoyable watch and a game I plan to recreate any the club and at home.
You could t drop the mortars he shells on top of the 88 and MG? Or did you just have smoke? Or did I miss something in the vid?
@@IronIvanKeith White phosphorous would have been a good alternative. Let 'em burn!
@@tasupa6992 White phosphorous and smoke are the same thing. So yes, good point. Two advantages for the price of one shell.
If Dike really did fall apart then maybe it was Combat Fatigue? He had been in combat before & done well. It does happen. Other point is who ordered such a crazy direct charge across open ground - in the snow? Nuts methinks!
You didn't mention one major factor and that was the supplies stockpiled in Leige.
Great video!
Another rules set I would recommend is Bolt Action by Warlord Games
We will be playing Bolt Action for an episode this season!
Awesome! Can’t wait to see it!
Enjoyed the history lesson. I agree with some of the other comments, gameplay could be at least 10 minutes longer. Regardless keep up the great work
11:33 half french half english pronounciation, interesting.
Is that Orson Welles narrating the film clip.
Do you guys pick your scenarios and then build and paint the armies for that game?
In a few cases, for a special or unique scenario. But for the most part guys in the club pick armies and eras that interest them generally, then they paint a large number of units for that era, allowing us to play a variety of scenarios.
If Dike failed making this attack, who was the genius who came up with the idea of launching an attack across an open field against a fortified enemy assisted by panzers? I would try maybe a night attack, or screen the attack with smoke, or sneak in along the side of the village, or call in heavy artillery to rubble the village...or almost anything other then what was attempted. Winters certainly beat up on Dike , but was the stupid attack plan thought up by Winters?
Hi guys great presentation. It is interesting that his contemporaries paint him as a coward yet his war record says something to the opposite. I see two possibilities.
1. Everyone has a breaking point no matter how bad ass they are and this was it for him.
2. He had broken a cultural taboo within the company and the results of those infernal politics drives the others to try to destroy his reputation. Statements like "pissed his pants" and others to me sounds like internal politics rather than what really happened.
Although you need to play this scenario several times to arrive at the probable outcome the game you played suggests the US forces will stall just short of Foy. I knew commander may have been one way to get a stalled attack going again. That is that the boys will not risk their lives for a commander that they don't trust perhaps because he broke an internal taboo. Injecting a commander that they did trust would explain the sudden come back and the attack is on again.
I am not claiming that this actually happened. I am suggesting another angle to consider.
This was the first video of yours that I have watched and was very impressed with you presentation.
Thanks, James. Hope you'll watch some more! Both of your Dike explanations are certainly possible. I think a third viable explanation is that he was perhaps unpopular and disliked on a personal level by many of the men in the company. Could have been a simple personality conflict. Whatever the case was, it's an interesting look inside company-level politics.
@@LittleWarsTV Totally agree. Exploring it as part of the game made it that much more interesting.
Great production guys!
Looks like the map from Red Orchestra Darkest Hour.
What a strange idea to assault a town through an open field and not even trying to reach and seize the closest building but run diagonally through a 88 gun line of fire...
I wonder whether the real fault lies with those higher up the chain of command who ordered only a single company to take Foy with minimal support whilst the Germans were supported by tanks and a flack gun. Such an action would warrant a couple of companies, and more artillery and sniper support at least.
3:58 The legend top right shows - Bastogne January 1944. But still good stuff, ty.
Just found you guys - this is brilliant. Keep up the good work.
Well thank you very much! Hope you stick around for more!
Chain of Command is a fun system. Even their I Ain't Been Shot Mum (IABSM) is fun. Good video...😁
Thanks! I am much more a fan of CoC than IABSM, but we've played a number of the Lardies rules in the club over the years, including Sharpe Practice and Charlie Don't Surf.
The sad truth about the US in the war was that our Army commands were unimaginative strategically and coordination between armor and infantry was terrible as a rule. The result was massive percentage of casualties were unnecessary
Hindsight is 20/20.
Great vid. Amazing table and the minis all looked well painted. But I did not get a good sense of the size of the two opposing forces. Maybe next time a little better introduction of the two armies?
Absolutely, this has been a popular suggestion. We intend to spend extra time on the armies, OOBs, and miniatures in the next season.
Quality gentlemen well done
I suppose you could say the entire thing was mute as the Germans had zero chance of success winning the Battle of the Bulge. Without fuel, the attack was fated to fail. US fuel depots could not have refueled the German tanks in any reasonable amount of time before counter attacking divisions were showing up. 20/20 hindsight wouldn't change the overall result.
it was for the morale, if they could have splite the allied army in two maybe the half part stuck in the north will have surrender, they were trying to do the same as dunkirke
Lt. Sobel: "Malarkey's slang for bullshit, isn't it?"
Why did they not go around the village and flank it.
What is your opinion of Avalon Hill Squad Leader 1977
Great table. I have to agree about Disposable hero,s they have been our go to rule set for our 20mm ww2 games for over 10 years now.
Great episode thank you :)
Love to see a DH Battlerep. Have always been interested in picking it up.
very enjoyable video
Would you consider coming to Barrage to report on the HAWKs’ two day convention. It is 28-29 September. See www.hawks-Barrage.org.
If we can make the logistics work, I think a few of the clubs from our club would be interested in coming down. We'll touch base with you to discuss it! The HAWKs do an incredible job at all the HMGS conventions and you guys always have great looking tabletops.
Really? Do you not have Winter Camo Minis?
Steve ya better grow a beard man, it'll keep ya 2 degrees warmer, guaranteed
Bolt action minis?
Nice H.G. Wells reference.
Keith, the living rule writing legend.
Getting some coffee, Oh yeah you buying? No.
Agreed that Spiers was a badass but he was also a war criminal.
It's interesting to think about is the Germans would have had all those men and all that equipment to defend the Rhine
what model company do you guys use in this video? or do you use multiple?
Those look like Artizan miniatures.
Love the humor
Indeed, it is pronounce 0:36
good show
Really cool!
Just my two cents here. I am a avid wargamer and I find it hard to belive that the german guns would have fired as late as they did. I know from the comments that this was a game system thing. But still that is not how it should work at all. If your in the open and units are in a buliding observing the field then there should be no reason at all they are not firing right then and there.
Each phase represents just a few seconds of action so guns would take time to prepare and fire. Officers and nco's need to get the gun into action, the weather conditions may mean the gun might need de-icing, the ammunition may not have been placed close to the gun and so take time for rounds to be moved, the gunners may need time to get into position after the action begins, the gunners are under fire and trying to keep under cover while operating the gun. There are hundreds of reasons why the gun could be late getting into action especially given the time scale each phase is supposed to represent. Chain of Command are not to everyone's taste but they represent the chaos of action and the difficulties of command very well. There are a plenty of rules that allow players to what they want when they want but Chain of Command isn't one of them. I've been wargaming since the 70s and played loads of WW2 rule sets in that time but CoC is without doubt the best of the lot balancing period feel, in game tactics and fun perfectly.
Great video , sub'd
Bois Jacques = JAMES Wood 😉
Awesome series btw 👍🏼👍🏼👍🏼
Mortars and WP smoke for the Paratroopers..
I used to be told I had a gay face, which was hurtful as Im not gay. Once I ditched the glitter eye shadow it decreased a lot.
Biggest blunder? That should fall into either German hands for falling for all those Soviet ruses, or to Japans for not blowing up those fuel depot in Pearl Harbor.
1. What soviet ruses? And 2. I severely doubt that wouldve made any difference in the long run.
Dont think nazis think....wermacht? I dont think i was a ss panzer division at foy was it?
TV is real, shut up Keith!
"Captain" Dike..."Lieutenant" Dike. The U.S. Army has posts. The Navy and Air Force have 'bases". You folks still make interesting content, and thanks for that.
3 times the manpower and fire superiority 6:1 the book says otherwise you don't make it. If they got away with it that means Germans with a low morale level which is understandable if you realize the war is all but lost.
Or maybe they were just that good.
I personally believe it was one of, if not, the worst failure's of military intelligence in American military history, but on the German end of things, it was (obviously) initially successful, but in the end, nothing really happened to the German's benefit in the outcome of the war. So I consider it a massive failure. Maybe not Barbarossa levels of failure, but one of their larger blunders during the war for sure (all my opinion).
You've wasted half the video on shoulda woulda coulda.
Patton was the only one who predicted the German offensive
I found this to be quite entertaining. I believe that there are some valuable history lessons as well as some leadership decision to be learned from these exercises. On the other hand, I was disappointed to hear the repetitive comments deriding a soldier in battle, regardless of the sources quoted. I am not confident that the players depicted in this episode have spent much time in a boxing ring, let alone in combat. They even seem to be a bit stressed over the flow of the game...a game. To besmirch a man who has done in real life what others only experience vicariously is certainly a human frailty in my opinion.
To Keith Stine. You typed and asked me what I was "going on about". Well, it seems clear that you understood, precisely what I wrote, you pitiful fuck. Until I watched this video, I had no idea as to who the Army officer was who is referred to in such a derogatory manner. The comments made by the fantasy warriors did nothing to honor the man's service to our country.
The folks depicted in this fantasy video look and act like stereotypical nerds who grab their junk when they think about taking an RPG up their ass. What in the hell has kept you guys from going to get a piece of the current long war...ya know, slots are still available. Go down next week and sign up to be a Grunt.
To those among you who have claimed combat experience, not just Cold War service, perhaps you will consider toning down your antics. You should know that criticizing anyone who has actually had their knees in the breeze is beneath you...especially when they are not able to beat your ass in case you are wrong. Yeah, just like you might feel if Hillary Clinton blamed a specific Marine for losing Fallujah the first time...and then laughed about it.
Band of Brothers is a great TV show, but fundamentally flawed historically.
Don't call it. fight down to the last man lol
I also hope my kids weren’t watching this.
Stop saying Nazis..
Nice battle report and overall video. Would you like to use Combat Patrol as one of your sets of rules to compare? If so, let me know, and I can send you copy. See www.bucksurdu.com/Buck_Surdu/Combat_Patrol.html and facebook.com/CombatPatrol/?ref=bookmarks
Interesting that your "Allied Military Planners" @114 photo was a grop of US generals only.... But I forget, the US won WW2 all on its own (of course)!
Lt spears is a bad as* he taken over command get the job done with the squad if I had to pick someone who can follow orders and get the job done it’s spears