Bates Stamp Review / HowTo (Bates Numbering Machine)

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 27 лип 2022
  • The Bates Numbering Machine, commonly called the Bates Stamp, invented in the 1890s. Mine is probably from around the 1940s.
    This is episode 62 of my video series about old calculating devices.
    End song inspired by "Hotter than a Molotov" by The Coup.
    Chris Staecker webarea: cstaecker.fairfield.edu/~cstae...
    #batesstamp

КОМЕНТАРІ • 71

  • @Pallethands
    @Pallethands Рік тому +63

    This review had everything, ORIGINAL paraphernalia, BONES, history, missing stylus. What more could you ask for?

    • @Alex-qq1gm
      @Alex-qq1gm Рік тому +2

      A visit to the Bates Manufacturing Company factory perhaps?

    • @unspeakablevorn
      @unspeakablevorn Рік тому

      There was a distinct lack of melonheads.

    • @yep_2431
      @yep_2431 Рік тому +1

      And broom splints!

  • @thomasr.jackson2940
    @thomasr.jackson2940 Рік тому +32

    For those not aware “sperm oil” refers to a once common lubricant derived from sperm whales. It had important industrial uses in the US until it was outlawed by the Endangered Species Act in the 1970s.
    Best to go with other lubricant options these days.

    • @capolaya
      @capolaya Рік тому +1

      It was also used as a fluid in car automatic transmissions.

  • @rzul
    @rzul Рік тому +9

    An outstanding example of engrossing storytelling.

  • @jathbr4113
    @jathbr4113 Рік тому +5

    Wake up babe, a new video from Professor Staecker just dropped!

  • @jimlassiter749
    @jimlassiter749 Рік тому +4

    We used the List Finder for our telephone directory back in the 70s.
    I always thought it was the coolest thing & now some 45 years later thanks to you, I now know what it was & who made it and found a pic of it to bring back faded memories....
    Thank you....

  • @circle9nerd
    @circle9nerd Рік тому +6

    Moral ambiguity and the question of double spending intellectual property by Edwin G. Bates. Lol. Love this series and the "trifecta of originality" in this episode! Thanks Chris!

  • @CheaddakerT.Snodgrass
    @CheaddakerT.Snodgrass Рік тому +2

    That's an incredible photo of Edwin Bates from the 1940s

  • @trillman1111
    @trillman1111 Рік тому +4

    A Chris Staecker certified kids toy

  • @felixecho
    @felixecho Рік тому +12

    I am so glad I found your videos. Now when I'm at estate sales I look for neat math devices. I got an ARITHMA with *original* instructions, and *original* stylus! No broom splints.

  • @pypes84
    @pypes84 Рік тому +14

    Print industry still uses stamps almost identical to this on "crash numbering machines" which are generally used to number multi-part / carbonless stationary that have been printed using a process that doesn't allow for variable data. It's called "crash numbering" because it'll "crash" through all the pages of a multi-part set. You can get type-height sized ones that will mount directly onto a letterpress too.
    Even stuff that's printed digitally will sometimes pick a 'grungy' typeface to emulate crash-numbering.

  • @IONATVS
    @IONATVS Рік тому +13

    There’s a term for when a Trademarked name is used so frequently it stops being trademarkable-genericization-and it’s a nightmare scenario for a lot of companies. You can’t trademark the regular everyday term for something, so if your trademark is so associated with something people call it that regardless of brand, a judge can rule it’s become the new generic term for it and your trademark is henceforth invalid. “Hoover” was genericized in Britain, so any vaccuum cleaner there can call its product a hoover whether it is made by Hoover or not. And for a Us example Webster’s was genericized for dictionaries, so the legal successors to the original Webster’s dictionary had to rebrand to Merriam-Webster at some point to keep brand recognition.
    It’s also the reason why Google *really* doesn’t want folks saying they google things and are desperate to get it OUT of the the Merriam-Webster and Oxford dictionaries. Or Coke doesn’t like midwesterners calling sprite a type of coke. Or Kleenex doesn’t want you calling generic tissues kleenex.

    • @ChrisStaecker
      @ChrisStaecker  Рік тому +6

      Yes- see privacyandiplawblog.com/2010/10/have-we-lawyers-genericized-bates-numbers/

    • @MattMcIrvin
      @MattMcIrvin 7 місяців тому +1

      The Lego company is particularly insistent about this. They're rabid about defending the IP they still hold (mostly trademarks, and the copyrights to particular sets) because the patents to most of their toys all expired many decades ago and they can't stop anyone from making functionally exact knockoffs of Lego bricks. They keep trying to just use trademark law to somehow stop that from happening and they always lose, because that's not what it's for, but fighting back can be expensive.

  • @ChurchOfThought
    @ChurchOfThought Рік тому +5

    The number goes up, that's what numbers do! 🚀

  • @mixer0014
    @mixer0014 Рік тому +6

    When visiting Tallinn last month I stopped by an antique shop to get a peek through the display window. There was a bunch of cool engineering-related stuff like a slide rule, an optical theodolite (no electronics) and, on a little table in the back, one of these amazing, hand-cranked mechanical calculators. It was a tiny one, probably 20x20cm, but seemed to have some additional functions based on the number of levers/switches. What a shame that the shop was closed at that time!

    • @someonespadre
      @someonespadre Рік тому

      In the US we call a telescopic instrument with visible angle plates and verniers a Transit, they usually have A and B verniers on opposite sides of the circle. If the angles are read through a little eyepiece (Wild, Zeiss, and Kern were the most common makers) then we call it a Theodolite. They are both theodolites and they are both transits (the telescope can be “transited” all the way around the horizontal axis without hitting anything) but Transit is understood to be the older instrument and theodolite is understood to be the internal reading instrument.

  • @jaapsch2
    @jaapsch2 Рік тому +1

    I've just bought such a machine, probably from the 1950s, but it's a different brand (GEMS). It has a switch to select the number of duplicates with the options 1, 2, 3, 4, or infinity. Amazingly enough I found that the German company Reiner still makes almost identical "Numeroteurs" today.

  • @NickSayers
    @NickSayers Рік тому +12

    Fun fact: My uncle had a Designer List Finder as his address book when I was a kid. I thought it was super cool! It still is.
    Thanks for another great video. I love your presentation style. It’s very ORIGINAL!

  • @baileykeller288
    @baileykeller288 Рік тому +4

    I wish I had one, but if I did I'd only use it a few times then forget about it in storage. A good piece of engineering deserves use.

  • @deathtotruthers1
    @deathtotruthers1 Рік тому +3

    What was unique about the Bates stamping for the legal world was not the consecutive numbering, but the "duplicate" option. I'm a lawyer and I have one of these too just for my shelf - if you switch that arrow to "duplicate", it will stamp the same number twice before increasing the number. This is because we lawyers produce documents a lot in discovery. In order to do that, we need two identical copies of the documents. One to send to the other side, and one to keep for ourselves. This is why the legal industry adopted Bates numbering. And you're right, we still use it today. But we don't stamp. The stamp stopped being used in the 80's. Cool video.

    • @EnjoyCocaColaLight
      @EnjoyCocaColaLight Рік тому

      Funny.

    • @BCThunderthud
      @BCThunderthud Рік тому

      I have one of these on my desk at work, I work in electronic discovery so it's kind of a totem of the industry.

    • @deathtotruthers1
      @deathtotruthers1 Рік тому +1

      @@BCThunderthud They're cool - a bit of legal history. Can't imagine the time when you had to physically stamp 15 boxes of docs with one of these.

    • @rockinbones8508
      @rockinbones8508 Рік тому

      @@deathtotruthers1 15 boxes? How about hundreds? Working in the legal photostat / photocopy industry in the 60's- 80's this was common. You would split boxes up in series, so you can have multiple people Bates Stamping.

    • @deathtotruthers1
      @deathtotruthers1 Рік тому +1

      @@rockinbones8508 Sounds like a nightmare! These days we just produce hundreds of thousands of pages in PDF and post them to something like Dropbox or Box. Can't imagine. I started in the law right as the move to computers was happening. Don't envy you that job back then!

  • @chrisbell1878
    @chrisbell1878 Рік тому +1

    I'm a new viewer. Your delivery is priceless - made me laugh out loud. Thank you!

  • @antiphlex
    @antiphlex Рік тому

    Oh man, your sense of humor is just so on point. I love these videos.

  • @jamiehardt3061
    @jamiehardt3061 Рік тому +4

    If you dig this you should find an Acmade edge coder. It’s a machine that does this except it prints ascending numbers on every foot of film in a reel.

  • @Vallee152
    @Vallee152 Рік тому +1

    yet another masterpiece of a video about a masterpiece of a machine

  • @BokBarber
    @BokBarber Місяць тому

    Well now I'm buying a Bates numbering machine. I've been looking for this exact thing but apparently my google-fu wasn't strong enough. Thanks Chris Staeker!

  • @reneejones6330
    @reneejones6330 Рік тому +4

    You are both informative and entertaining and I love your videos about old technology. Thank you and keep it up!

  • @someonespadre
    @someonespadre Рік тому +1

    The list finder was commonly used for names and phone numbers, a contact list. Like a Rolodex. Those have been around my entire life.

    • @someonespadre
      @someonespadre Рік тому

      Deeds are commonly recorded in books called a Liber.

  • @vuuvovuuv
    @vuuvovuuv Рік тому +2

    that vanilla ice reference was 😙👌 chef's kiss

  • @rodanvsandrew
    @rodanvsandrew Рік тому +1

    That's a great photo of Edwin

  • @chrisbell1878
    @chrisbell1878 Рік тому

    BTW, I forgot to say that I used to work in the Australian Customs Service and we had heaps of these for numbering import documents and receipts. Some had dates or day numbers on them, and you'd inevitably forget to change them for the new day!

  • @luserdroog
    @luserdroog Рік тому

    My mother, who is an attorney, used these into the 90s and early 2000s.

  • @roseblitz1439
    @roseblitz1439 Місяць тому

    I have a Bates Numbering Machine Serial No. D464641, 6 wheels and STYLE E. It was made in Hackettstown, NJ. I guess this was from Bates' second company. It is definitely stuck. It stamps but the numbers don't change. I thought it was funny that you used Bates from Downton Abbey. 😂

  • @Matthew-ju3nk
    @Matthew-ju3nk 9 місяців тому

    Dude... I love your style!

  • @TNAv102
    @TNAv102 Рік тому +1

    Likes go up. That's what likes do. Kiitos.

  • @rumpbuns
    @rumpbuns Рік тому +5

    The bones to pads ratio is WAY off on that Amazon listing

  • @vincentkuijpers9219
    @vincentkuijpers9219 10 місяців тому

    would love a conclusion of some sort at the end. But entertaining video for sure

  • @thebudgetbee9694
    @thebudgetbee9694 Рік тому

    New subbie. Very cool video! I didn't know you could still buy Bates ink! And I'm so happy to see HOW to get the inky pad door open. TFS!

  • @MaxSolar-dd5wq
    @MaxSolar-dd5wq 2 місяці тому

    Lol it took me a whole year to notice the Bates joke at 0:42

  • @ct92404
    @ct92404 Рік тому

    I want one! I have no idea what I would really do with it...but I want one!! 😂

  • @nashvillain171
    @nashvillain171 Рік тому +1

    Great video! 😃👍

  • @deborahpowell5564
    @deborahpowell5564 4 місяці тому

    I used a pencil for mine. Worked perfectly. But, you can only move the numbers from one side.

  • @unspeakablevorn
    @unspeakablevorn Рік тому +2

    I want to see the innards of this thing that lets it do duplicate mode

    • @ChrisStaecker
      @ChrisStaecker  Рік тому +3

      This was disappointing to me- you can see screws on the face plates but the front plate can’t be easily removed because of the little knob on there. You can take off the back plate, but there’s really nothing visible on the inside.

  • @Mural
    @Mural Рік тому +2

    Only one! For eight bones!

  • @Nivlactollrj
    @Nivlactollrj 10 місяців тому

    My dad has one. Somehow the pin was removed. Do you have recommendations on how to place the pin back in with the spring?

  • @starga-fr7qx
    @starga-fr7qx Рік тому +1

    I don't really need one
    but I WANT one

    • @ct92404
      @ct92404 Рік тому

      I *must* have one!
      Not sure why, I don't know what I would really do with it...but I must have one.

  •  Рік тому

    Are you sure about that Bates image at 0:44? :-)

  • @math1183
    @math1183 Рік тому

    Hmm... I think I recognize that John (Edwin) Bates?

  • @MrKhaos79
    @MrKhaos79 7 місяців тому

    How do you sink numbers that you don't want? For example if you just want to stamp a number like 001?

    • @ChrisStaecker
      @ChrisStaecker  7 місяців тому

      Gotta use the wooden stylo to turn it to the number you want. Not very satisfying.

  • @mcrsit
    @mcrsit Рік тому +1

    Yoooo

  • @jjcc8379
    @jjcc8379 Рік тому +1

    I was expecting a joke about a "Master" series of the numbering machine.
    Or him getting an apprentice , so it would be referring to him as "Master" ... Bates.
    :( The internet has ruined me .

  • @Mj323_bb
    @Mj323_bb Рік тому +1

    That's not Edwin Bates, that's John Bates ; )

  • @EnjoyCocaColaLight
    @EnjoyCocaColaLight Рік тому +1

    WHY AM I WATCHING THIS VIDEO

  • @ChurchOfThought
    @ChurchOfThought Рік тому +3

    Too bad you can't just use a broom splint

  • @amoledzeppelin
    @amoledzeppelin Рік тому

    TFW E.G. Bates invented something more useful and longer-lasting than B. Gates.

  • @theshuman100
    @theshuman100 8 місяців тому

    youd think the guy selling a product used for people handling legal documents would know better than to pull a stunt like that

  • @dancoroian1
    @dancoroian1 10 місяців тому

    I'm sorry, refined sperm??

  • @AlRoderick
    @AlRoderick Рік тому +7

    A machine so old they recommend lubricating it with whale oil. 🐋🛢️