I appreciate you telling us the exact point "where it gets crazy", but I really need you to tell us exacrly when it STOPS being crazy too. For example, is it crazy right now? I think we deserve to know.
Life was easier pre internet, be grateful for instant messaging, and worldwide connection. even though the american's are spying on all phone calls, texts, and emails
I clicked on an intriguing triangular island and I got this! Of course Piri Reis wasn't a hoax. There was no hoax value in a Turkish admiral creating a map with real longitudes using projections that people didn't even understand at the time. And if that was the only evidence we had of ancient prehistoric civilizations then it would be easy to dismiss it. But all those megalithic structures all over the world didn't build themselves, and as much as we would like to attribute them to known civilizations, it's just not possible. Plus, we know that oceans were at one time much lower in many parts of the world because we can see underwater ruins that can only be explained by a rise in oceans at the end of the last ice age.
Why is it impossible for known civilizations to have constructed those monuments? For example, Egypt's pyramids. Why couldn't they have built it? Don't say "I can't imagine how they could, so it's impossible". That's a logical fallacy called "argument from personal incredulity". So you have to give something else. It's been demonstrated that simple techniques which would've been within the grasp of civilizations and societies of those times could have been used to do the construction, by countless experiments. Also, in the case of the Pyramids, which I just mentioned, remains of infrastructure to support the workers was found there, proving the Egyptians did, in fact, build them. It doesn't take super-technology to stack rocks. It just takes a little human ingenuity, and a lot of muscle power. Put those things together, and you can build some amazing monuments, and indeed, they did. We may not know the precise and exact method that was employed, but we don't need to: all we need to do is show that it would've been within their reach, and then there's no need to consider alternative hypotheses unless you have some kind of extra evidence to support or suggest them. Do you have such evidence? If so, you should present it here.
Historians say that the Turks actually followed Columbus and Some conquistadors to the new world so perhaps the Turkish might have mapped the Americas while the Spanish were taking over the Americas and The Caribbean.
It`ll be really funny when future conspiracy theorists find some old dungeons and dragons maps and make up wierd stories of hidden worlds and ancient societies.
Well, if you wanna know about weird stories and nonsensical shit, look no further than the Bible. I bet Jesus was like a Harry Potter and people believe that shit was real LOL.
ForbiddenFish See when people like you spit trash like that against The Bible..it highly discredits you. Why put down something you have no clue about? is it fear?
Maelyne Acoustic Fear? Nope, I used to follow that book, but then I realized that the only good thing about it is that it can be used as toilet paper. So no, it's not something that "I have no clue about", I simply realized it was bullshit. Unlike most Christians, I have actually read that silly book.
It's funny THEY haven't stumbled upon these videos yet, after 3 years and a half. Now over 1 million people know what they didn't want us to know... THEY aren't doing a very good job not letting us know what they don't want us to know...
zeb doz I agree w/ you on "trusting" everything on Google, but why believe our GPS system & satellites are accurate? I'm not trying to start a big debate lol just curious :)
Well I used to be a land surveyor for like 25years and am very familar with measurements and as well with GPS and gps is can be as accurate up to the hundreds of thousands of a square inch
What I am about to say might be hard for some people to read, but it is the truth. But before I say it, I want to say this. No matter what I write below, it does not diminish the fact that there may be ancient civilizations who were far more advanced than we realize. I personally believe there were. However, the three mentioned in the video cannot possibly be among them. The ancient civilizations with far more knowledge than it is classically taught that they had were most likely the Ancient Egyptians, Incans, Greeks, Minoans, and Chinese. In my opinion those five either had established global trade, or at the very least had a global trade network set up between them, even if they themselves didn't have full reign of the oceans. What I mean is Incans trading with Chinese and Egyptians. Egyptians trading with the Greeks. and Minoans. Greeks and Minoans trading with Egyptians and Chinese. Like basically each one individually might not have had global trade going on, but together their trade and thus knowledge of geography spanned the globe. We already know where Shangri La was. Archaeologists have been there. The civilization was primitive by today's standards... It was primitive by Ancient Roman standards. But it was far more advanced than any other civilization in the area at the time. Atlantis, as well as the story of Socrates, were cautionary tales made up by Plato, to discourage people from the path of science. Plato was a member of the crazy wackjob cult run by Pythagoras, and the entire religion believed that it's better to think about how the world might work than it is to do experiments to find out how it is. So Plato came up with Atlantis, saying that they sought knowledge and science, and were wiped out. Then there's Socrates, who was put to death for employing the scientific method. Lemuria is a fictional continent made up in the 19th century by a science fiction author. I am willing to reconsider my position on those three. However, verifiable evidence must be provided before I can reconsider. I have researched the hell out of Atlantis and Shangri La. My research on Lemuria was cut short by tracing the origins to a fiction novel, with absolutely zero mentions of it in any myths prior to that 19th century novel. I didn't stop there though, I also looked for evidence that there may have been a continent in middle of the the pacific and found that it's pretty much an impossibility as far as I can tell. Again, present me with evidence if you disagree. "I had a telepathic message from an Lemurian living in the Andromeda Galaxy" is not evidence of Lemuria because I cannot verify that you had such a telepathic message, no matter how much you believe you did, even if you are absolutely correct about it, I still can't verify it.
Jenny Tokumei Pay? That's beside the point. I get paid enough that I don't have to fill my days with baseless conspiracy ideations. There are real problems in the word, and if you're spending all this time "researching" said conspiracies, then you're wasting your valuable time far more than I'm wasting mine responding to silly UA-cam comments.
nyak63RUS Somehow you've embraced a logical disconnect when you can discern degrees of value in time wastage. How is it possible to waste time "far more" than to respond to a silly youtube comment? No need to respond, I'm just trying to spin your thinking gears.
Not exactly of "being watched", but I stumbled upon this series via the episode on DMT and it was late at night that day and it gave me this primal fear that I remember from childhood, where you're uncomfortable walking through unlit rooms and regularly want to check our back. I thought I had outgrown that for good, haha!
+Steven Kenniff The Antarctic Peninsula has an eastern shore and a western shore. Weddell Sea also has eastern and western shores - so does the Ross Sea, etc. Most people know next to nothing about Antarctica - they convince themselves that it's a big blob of ice and snow on a continent. Antarctica is not a continent. It's a group of island mountains, mostly covered by snow and ice which extends out over the sea water and connects with the ice and snow on the other islands, which creates the illusion that Antarctica is a continent. Greenland is also a group of island mountains covered by ice and snow. But all this is stuff they don't want you to know.
Lol...I so fuckin love reading the comments section. Its so many undiscovered comedians in this world man I swear. Gets me every time....Had a bad day..Just go to UA-cam and read the comments..Shit is actually more entertaining than the fucking videos..lol
Not sure to what you meant by the squirrel comment...But I dont do online shit bruh and I dont argue, especially with men. So...If you have some beef or issue with what I have stated and feel the need to want to vent...Do so as a man in my face and from behind the mask by yourself. If not, then you are indeed a coward and your statement is the exact reason I said that the comments section is entertaining.
Jahsire Williams u laugh at ppl like me and my ilk, so i laugh bk. i responded to ur vent/attack! u ever think the mask serves a purpose? all those ppl marching and for what…
Oh, ok..I thought that was meant in a negative way. Thats why I dont like messages without speaking to a person because sometimes it has no tone. Lol. So if you didnt mean it in a negative way, you know the squirrel shit, then ill apologize for the other statement that I said as a man. But yes..I laugh every day at the comedians online. People are very funny and some dont even know it.
Conspiracy is not a theory, it is a proven fact. Conspiracy exists, on many levels. The question is: How deep does the rabbit hole go? And do we really want to know? Or will our atrophied minds balk when confronted with truth which shatters our preconceived notions?
conspiracy is indeed not a theory. but a conspiracy theory is. it is just a theory. and the fun with theories is that it has no limits or boundaries. the rabbit hole can go as deep as your imagination allows it to.
+Chris Barreira They had no technology back then - everybody knows that - so what if ancient texts around the world describe their technologies - so what if the ancient Babylonians had a furnace that could be turned up seven times its normal setting - so what if they had aircraft, so what if they could slice through mountains all across this Earth and transport gigantic boulders and erect the boulders in geometrically-precise positions... they were primitive people.
@@WhirledPublishing what I think is we’ve been on the planet for longer then documented , and every so often we get wiped out by a natural event. Only few survive and have to start over again inventing new technologies because all was lost during the catastrophe. That’s why Elon musks idea of multi planetary is good to preserve our species. Maybe in the past we’ve already became multi planetary and those alien crafts we see are other humans from millions of years ago. They’ve just kept evolving. Anything could happen. Anything’s possible
Stuff They Don't Want You To Know- THESE VIDEOS ARE ADDICTIVE! I have spent 5 straight hours watching these videos. I'm supposed to be looking for a job.
Our earlier ancestors having better navigational knowledge and travelling vast distances across the oceans is widely accepted, we know that the Austronesians started criss crossing the Pacific as early as 10,000BC and possibly even later. We know Bronze Age Europeans traded across the whole of the Mediterranean and further and that the Vikings crossed the Atlantic regularly, its no stretch to imagine that there might be some truth to some of these maps.
+Tusk Bilasimo And fairy tales are reliable too... all those wonderful stories about non-humans wanting to "marry" the virgin maiden... Beauty and the Beast... the Frog Prince... 100 years ago, an illustrator depicted the "beast" as a green lizard... a very reliable source of information...
It shows the northern shore of antarctica? Where's the southern shore then? I would understand someone referring to the western or eastern shore, but you may as well replace the phrase "the northern shore of antarctica" with "the shore of antarctica."
Could be...but here's some food for thought. The map of the world taught in school up until say...the year 2000 was......wrong. Look up Mercator vs Gall-Peters.
Gary Brown, why not? how about, Peters vs Mercator maps,,?? very true, if you research.. and we are only talking about distorted content here,, why not could there be maps showing more than what we are shown now? en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gall%E2%80%93Peters_projection
@Gary Brown: That would be impossible, since today's maps are constructed from direct satellite imaging, which gives THE TRUTH as to the geography of the Earth, and if you compare these maps with the current satellite maps, and are _Honest_ about the comparison, you'll find they do in fact differ, meaning the earlier maps are wrong. Find it funny that the map that supposedly shows "Antarctica" also _fails_ to show the east coast of North America correctly! I think the "skeptics" are right here, and as usual, the "conspiracy theorists" are wrong. Someone said "What do you call 'alternative medicine' that's been proven to work? Medicine." I'd suggest: "What do you call 'conspiracy theories' that have been proven true? History." Tise Ignite That would require some very extensive geological change in the past 2,500 years, which is pretty much impossible. You can't move continental plates that fast. The friction would melt the entire crust. Nothing would be alive on Earth today. Contrary to what some people popularly believe, the crust of the Earth does not float atop liquid, but instead sits upon "rock wax". That's what the mantle is like: a waxy *solid*, not a liquid. Besides, there's no source of energy that would accomplish such a movement. Finally, there's no trace of such change in the geological record.
@mike4ty4 Todays maps are often marine navigation maps, period,, scientist use different kind of maps depending on the info they need, (surface info, navigation info etc)... Its not that one is false and the other is more accurate,, its that the representation of what earth looks like is a rendering, not an actual depiction of earth,, so maps are always (even when mapped trough satellite photo) an illustration of reality,, unless youve been into space, (or on some very good spacestation footage) no one knows how earth really looks like.. its an aprochimation... I was shocked to see that landmasses look different according to which maps (computation, scales etc) where used ... yet this distorted reality has been promoted as if it was the truth and only truth .. The question and main topic remains,, how could this old PR map, contain near satellite accurate info?
In regards the Piri Reis map. Yes the map does imply that the bottom coast is Antarctica , but if you have a moment and read Dr Hapgood's theory on Earth crust Displacement (a key premise of the film 2012). One of the small islands is the Falkland islands. Along with what is now Nova Scotia, that has significantly moved from Besides Florida in the map (look for the key's not the Fallious! However my best guess is that it's still south America. Given that it's curved around.
the graphic ''Triangle Map'' shown is very likely an aerial photo of a USA military island base from the era between WW2 [when radar became ouvert] & 1980 [when satellites covered the same ground]. Such remote sea bases could consist of only a "radar shack" + 2 or 3 short airstrips fitted onto a tiny atoll. See 'Kwajelain Atoll' for the largest of these.
Here are the facts: I ate 5 pounds of suicide hot wings, they make my eyes water, and they give me heart burn. With drool pouring out of my mouth like a water fountain. Which makes me sweat like I'm having a heart attack. Here's where it gets crazy: My colon couldn't bare the build up of gas, so I ran to the bathroom to take a huge mondo dump. I was screaming in pain as my asshole burns. While sitting on the jon for 1 hour yelling "bloody Jesus, Mary, and Joseph!" I tried flushing the toilet and it over flowed. I told my parents that ISIS did this.
Is it just a fringe conspiracy? Is it really violent terrorists planning to overflow everyone's toilets? Or is it something, that they _don't want you to know..._
Cartographers were highly specialized and protected people in the ancient world, and they rarely collected their own data. Rather, they spoke with ship navigators and other cartographers to source their were so the large amount of 'hearsay' made for a very relative definition of 'good maps'. ALSO, maps were the state secrets of their time, the best maps were kept to the government and their friends and at sea the navigator and ships captain were the only ones who had access. When the ship was compromised the maps were the first things destroyed before they surrendered/scuttled their vessel...so not many old maps remain.
I don't like the "spooky" narration. Plus I've watched other vids from this channel, and usually there is a lot of unconfirmed "facts" and disproven evidence that they feature because it is interesting
WuCurdy it gets annoying because they hook you in and THEN once you're hooked they reveal to you that it was a false i.e. pranks, no evidence, disproved theory... it's very aannoying
From Wikipedia: Dyslexia is difficulty in learning to read fluently and with accurate comprehension. This includes difficulty with phonological awareness, phonological decoding, processing speed, orthographic coding, auditory short-term memory, *language skills/verbal comprehension*, and/or rapid naming.
Look at it this way: in almost all religious texts, as well as a huge number of authentic and important historical records, there exists legends of an advanced or utopian society: Atlantis, the Garden of Eden, etc. Given, it may not be that there was once a civilization that technically speaking, was more advanced or perfect than ours, but the existence of so many legends from all over the world about similar societies, to me, definitely shows that there were some advanced cities in the past.
Mr. God no its not, because if you choose to leave (aka be a coward/retreat to more enemies than you can handle) a battle then there is no winner, or loser. if you choose not to play a game then you cant win or lose. simple as that. most the time its written by the victors yes, but not every time.
Sadyh Von Schattig why because you cant deny this truth? so you can just be one of the people who always thinks that people on youtube are wrong when sometimes their right?
abdulrsno1 that is true, however i have an example, you could argue that they lost, but they became history, thus shattering the theory that victors always write history(this was true with the greeks and romans and such, but nowadays it isnt): the jews in the holocaust who survived. they survived, yeah they lost everything and you could argue they were losers, but still became history, and a big part of that timeline. the diary of ann frank a person who died obivously was one of the majors, yet despite her dying still became history.
Love this channel. Thought I had subscription but it must have been the other channel. The best part not included in the video. "True life really is STRANGER than fiction." If you don't believe me, just stay alive for awhile longer. "Not far, Yoda not far." Amazing things are just the other side of the horizon.
All conspiracy theorists just see what they want and ignore the rest, it's really frustrating. If they didn't do this, then there would far fewer conspiracy theories, but with a stronger and more credible set of evidence. Then people might take them a bit more seriously.
"All conspiracy theorists" *and* people who make sweeping generalizations by placing people into artificial categories do not help us very much. It is very human to see "just what we want to see." Ignoring the levels of mercury in lakes and rivers that lead to locally caught fish being unsafe to eat is one example of how people "only see what they want to." Nobody is ranting about coal being a "conspiracy" - because there is no need to distract people who are not paying attention to begin with.
Jonny Harding Nope. Never been much into herd mentalities of any kind. Interesting to study from aloof, but not usually going deep enough in the pursuit for personal understanding. Both have their place. Just like any data we come into contact with, it ultimately gives us the greatest gift when we learn something from it. Testing the limits of what we can see & know, allows us to better approximate the "big picture" in terms of probabilities. Many of our personal convictions come down to a position that we find ourselves taking on one side of a probability. I am not a "conspiracy" theorist but when I hear a good story, I will sometimes take a look. Look at how much has been covered up in the past, in our recent past and the ancient past. There have always been major disconnects between the "playing field" known to different classes of citizens; their database of current on-goings would not put them in a position to make informed judgments or decisions as those at the top 10% or less- and as long as secrets are easily kept, there will be hidden things revealed. But there is a lot of complete garbage and bullshit out there that I wish I had known more about a long time ago.
I watch a lot of conspiracy videos myself, however always find them to be based on solely speculative evidence which is presented as fact- and with this I do mean all the time. That's what annoys me if more arguments were based on sound or at least credible evidence, then voices would be heard more and there wouldn't be any kind of grouping of conspiracy theorists either.
Jonny Harding Exactly. There are valid finding which do raise important questions, but people are more interested in making money (ATTN: ancient aliens) and making outlandish claims. Sometimes I hope that more honest researchers will continue to ask questions (and they are, in regards to things such as the dating of the Sphinx), but the sad part is there is so much time & energy put towards supporting their "agendas" instead of simply following the evidence where-ever it leads. It is truly frustrating and holding us back!
* * * Great videos, if you can, try to take pauses to give us viewers time to let it sink in and wrap our minds around the ideas. Other than that, keep up the good work!! * * *
There are actually a surprising number of maps with "anomalies". There's more than 1 map showing "atlantis" at exactly that location, of of them was found in south america. However, there are even more maps showing the detailed shore (under the ice) of antarctica.
The stuff they don’t want you to know is that the Piri Reis map was only one of several ancient maps that show the Western Hemisphere. Columbus followed some of these maps when he crossed ocean.
The advantage of a fiat currency is in theory to match the expansion of the money supply with the expansion of economic output rather than having the money supply expand arbitrarily whenever a Yukon Cornelius strikes gold. This helps prevent unwanted inflation from rapid, unexpected changes in the money supply. The gold standard can become deflationary during a time of economic expansion due to its inelasticity and ultimately put a damper on growth
You forgot to mention how the Piri Reis map was actually cross-checked by the Navy in the early 1950's, and it was shown to be a quite accurate depiction of what the land under Antarctica would have looked like....
I've seen a few Medieval maps of the known world with Latin references to cold temperature zones in both the north and the south and couldn't help but to wonder how could they have known this without having sailed to Antarctica. When you think of what was known during this era, one would imagine maps showing warmth as one travels south. These maps only consisted of the Middle East, Europe, Eurasia, and Northern Africa, yet they had reference to a frigid zone in both the north and the south!
Actually, the fed is subject to congressional oversight. In fact, back in the days of gold standard, there was a major economic collapse every few years, there have only been 3 since the introduction of federal banking
with our current form of media and information that is available people seem to forget that in those old days being objective about anything was not common. this leads to everything written and drawn being a work of its author with his interpretation about something, and when he didn't know a certain thing he would probably just have made it up.
The fact you define our society as advanced just proves how much you really know about the truth about how advanced we really are. The elites prevent us from that luxury.
There are maps that show the outline of Antarctica that are hundreds of years old (at least) and the actual mapping of Antarctica was not done until a few decades ago because of the ice that covers the land. Such information comes from civilizations that are no longer around on this planet, but they were at one time. The evidence comes from deep within the earth, coal mines and such, and these artifacts tell of what once was on our planet, and what will happen again someday...destruction.
Even if there are lost civilizations. who were quite advanced back in the day, how does this affect us in the here and now? Sure it's unfortunate that ancient industrial age civilizations could have existed and most all evidence of them could have been wiped out. but why would anyone withing academia (or in any position of power) want to cover that up?
They would still have the stone structures we built, mount rushmore, stonehenge, plastic water bottles, strip mines, etc. It would be really really difficult to erase all of the evidence of us.
I for one do believe there was a Ancient civilisation or civilisations that existed thousands of years ago that had travelled most of the known world, but I wonder whatever had happened to them?, I'm still kind of skeptical about it but it is very interesting.
I have an explanation for the map: it was dated inaccurately. Constantinople was conquered by Turks a little later than we think, only after the conquista. The Greeks had maps from the Spaniards showing the America they had just discovered and conquered.
Of all of these, I'm most inclined to believe the Piris Reis map because it could fit into biblical history. After the Flood, the frequent volcanic activity created a perpetually cool climate due to all of the soot in the atmosphere. Warm oceans, a result of the Flood, evaporated and deposited moisture on the land. This caused a buildup of ice and lowered sea levels, potentially even exposing land bridges between continents. This would aid humans in recolonizing Earth after the Flood.
People need to take into consideration that the earth is constantly though very slowly changing. Hawaii is a chain of volcanic islands that is moving north, in some places land got swallowed up by rivers or oceans, continents pull away or smash into each other. Perhaps these "strange maps" were what the earth use to look like at that time but has changed since then.
Within the "accepted" age of human beings on this planet capable of making maps, the earth has not changed that much - something capable of producing such earth shaping change in such a short geological period would have probably been disastrous for humanity, such as a global flood of biblical proportion.
The trouble with most of humanity in general is that we believe what we want to believe, and this is no exception with anybody. Society wants to believe that we are more advanced than we ever have been in the past, so the ones that control the knowledge we have are repeatedly squashing anything that could prove that we're no better than we were in the past. That's pretty much why society isn't making any massive advancements with its attitudes towards issues and knowledge that we don't agree with.
I have this freaky feeling that we as civilization have been around far longer than we anticipated or that we're at least missing an important part. It would explain isolated areas having similar knowledge and seems a bit mor likely than aliens to me for some reason.
These old stories are what got me hooked on youtube. Where did this narrator go? His voice is missed.
I appreciate you telling us the exact point "where it gets crazy", but I really need you to tell us exacrly when it STOPS being crazy too. For example, is it crazy right now? I think we deserve to know.
😆
Maybe it becomes crazier? LoL 😂
"The Northern Coast of Anarctica"?
Uhm, it is all northern.
+NoggleBaum
LOFL. No Shit.
+NoggleBaum Antarctica is in the Southern Hemisphere smart ass
+Spencer Smith That is his point, all of the coastline would be to the north of the south pole.
The Antarctic peninsular has east and west coasts.
You beat me to it by 7 months
I like how this guy's voice is so lively and animated, makes me want to watch the entire video
Every time
I love the narrater's voice, and the music is perfect as well.
They dont want us to know but these videos are still on youtube.
Don't think you learn that much here, otherwise it'd be taken down.
Woah... I just noticed that at the very beginning of the intro, the houses' "address" is 1984. Pretty clever reference there.
Oh come on, even for 2011, 240p just isn't acceptable guys.
***** You might need to clean up your computer or get off Dial-up, since dsl can load faster than 240p.
Life was easier pre internet, be grateful for instant messaging, and
worldwide connection.
even though the american's are spying on all phone calls, texts, and emails
I clicked on an intriguing triangular island and I got this!
Of course Piri Reis wasn't a hoax. There was no hoax value in a Turkish admiral creating a map with real longitudes using projections that people didn't even understand at the time. And if that was the only evidence we had of ancient prehistoric civilizations then it would be easy to dismiss it. But all those megalithic structures all over the world didn't build themselves, and as much as we would like to attribute them to known civilizations, it's just not possible. Plus, we know that oceans were at one time much lower in many parts of the world because we can see underwater ruins that can only be explained by a rise in oceans at the end of the last ice age.
"Of course Piri Reis wasn't a hoax"? please show me your evidence for your mislead beliefs.
Why is it impossible for known civilizations to have constructed those monuments? For example, Egypt's pyramids. Why couldn't they have built it? Don't say "I can't imagine how they could, so it's impossible". That's a logical fallacy called "argument from personal incredulity". So you have to give something else.
It's been demonstrated that simple techniques which would've been within the grasp of civilizations and societies of those times could have been used to do the construction, by countless experiments. Also, in the case of the Pyramids, which I just mentioned, remains of infrastructure to support the workers was found there, proving the Egyptians did, in fact, build them.
It doesn't take super-technology to stack rocks. It just takes a little human ingenuity, and a lot of muscle power. Put those things together, and you can build some amazing monuments, and indeed, they did.
We may not know the precise and exact method that was employed, but we don't need to: all we need to do is show that it would've been within their reach, and then there's no need to consider alternative hypotheses unless you have some kind of extra evidence to support or suggest them. Do you have such evidence? If so, you should present it here.
mike4ty4 Right on sir. Couldn't of said it better myself.
Historians say that the Turks actually followed Columbus and Some conquistadors to the new world so perhaps the Turkish might have mapped the Americas while the Spanish were taking over the Americas and The Caribbean.
Which Text-to-Speech program did you guys use for this video?
arbitterm a talent one
how abouth you try to find this program for you videos
It`ll be really funny when future conspiracy theorists find some old dungeons and dragons maps and make up wierd stories of hidden worlds and ancient societies.
Next on History HD: Wizards and the dragons they fought in dungeons. And Pokemon fossils finally discovered under the Arctic ice shelf. :lol
omg this makes total sence maybe the things like ancient alien drawings is just an ancient game if tic tac toe.
Well, if you wanna know about weird stories and nonsensical shit, look no further than the Bible. I bet Jesus was like a Harry Potter and people believe that shit was real LOL.
ForbiddenFish See when people like you spit trash like that against The Bible..it highly discredits you. Why put down something you have no clue about? is it fear?
Maelyne Acoustic Fear? Nope, I used to follow that book, but then I realized that the only good thing about it is that it can be used as toilet paper. So no, it's not something that "I have no clue about", I simply realized it was bullshit. Unlike most Christians, I have actually read that silly book.
It's funny THEY haven't stumbled upon these videos yet, after 3 years and a half. Now over 1 million people know what they didn't want us to know... THEY aren't doing a very good job not letting us know what they don't want us to know...
And 8 years later the video is still up lol
well with satellites as well as GPS, i think that kinda rules out inaccurate maps nowadays huh?
google the peter projection map, thats the only true map in my books
i do not trust anything from Google
zeb doz
Yet you are on youtube ...
zeb doz I agree w/ you on "trusting" everything on Google, but why believe our GPS system & satellites are accurate? I'm not trying to start a big debate lol just curious :)
Well I used to be a land surveyor for like 25years and am very familar with measurements and as well with GPS and gps is can be as accurate up to the hundreds of thousands of a square inch
That stoopid doorbell at the beginning of the vid actually made me go check my door..
Lol xD
ha ha !
Sooooo....the doorbell was stupid?
That droning, hypnotic voice...take me to your leaders...
Cool video! There used to be shows like this on TV ... thanks for making the video.
What I am about to say might be hard for some people to read, but it is the truth. But before I say it, I want to say this.
No matter what I write below, it does not diminish the fact that there may be ancient civilizations who were far more advanced than we realize. I personally believe there were. However, the three mentioned in the video cannot possibly be among them. The ancient civilizations with far more knowledge than it is classically taught that they had were most likely the Ancient Egyptians, Incans, Greeks, Minoans, and Chinese. In my opinion those five either had established global trade, or at the very least had a global trade network set up between them, even if they themselves didn't have full reign of the oceans. What I mean is Incans trading with Chinese and Egyptians. Egyptians trading with the Greeks. and Minoans. Greeks and Minoans trading with Egyptians and Chinese. Like basically each one individually might not have had global trade going on, but together their trade and thus knowledge of geography spanned the globe.
We already know where Shangri La was. Archaeologists have been there. The civilization was primitive by today's standards... It was primitive by Ancient Roman standards. But it was far more advanced than any other civilization in the area at the time.
Atlantis, as well as the story of Socrates, were cautionary tales made up by Plato, to discourage people from the path of science. Plato was a member of the crazy wackjob cult run by Pythagoras, and the entire religion believed that it's better to think about how the world might work than it is to do experiments to find out how it is. So Plato came up with Atlantis, saying that they sought knowledge and science, and were wiped out. Then there's Socrates, who was put to death for employing the scientific method.
Lemuria is a fictional continent made up in the 19th century by a science fiction author.
I am willing to reconsider my position on those three. However, verifiable evidence must be provided before I can reconsider. I have researched the hell out of Atlantis and Shangri La. My research on Lemuria was cut short by tracing the origins to a fiction novel, with absolutely zero mentions of it in any myths prior to that 19th century novel. I didn't stop there though, I also looked for evidence that there may have been a continent in middle of the the pacific and found that it's pretty much an impossibility as far as I can tell.
Again, present me with evidence if you disagree. "I had a telepathic message from an Lemurian living in the Andromeda Galaxy" is not evidence of Lemuria because I cannot verify that you had such a telepathic message, no matter how much you believe you did, even if you are absolutely correct about it, I still can't verify it.
Get a job.
nyak63RUS Have one. Pays better than yours I'd wager. At least it doesn't involve the words "would you like fries with that?"
Jenny Tokumei
Pay? That's beside the point. I get paid enough that I don't have to fill my days with baseless conspiracy ideations. There are real problems in the word, and if you're spending all this time "researching" said conspiracies, then you're wasting your valuable time far more than I'm wasting mine responding to silly UA-cam comments.
nyak63RUS
And who exactly are you to dictate what I can and cannot do for a hobby?
nyak63RUS
Somehow you've embraced a logical disconnect when you can discern degrees of value in time wastage. How is it possible to waste time "far more" than to respond to a silly youtube comment? No need to respond, I'm just trying to spin your thinking gears.
Not exactly of "being watched", but I stumbled upon this series via the episode on DMT and it was late at night that day and it gave me this primal fear that I remember from childhood, where you're uncomfortable walking through unlit rooms and regularly want to check our back. I thought I had outgrown that for good, haha!
You Monotone delivery doesn't make script seem more important or serious, it makes it rather boring. Also your phrasing is a tad run on.
Darrin Funk
If that is the case, no wonder it's annoying.
+Old Man from Scene Twenty Four The voice was so annoying, I stopped half-way through. And that is not a computer voice.
+Darrin Funk no man, that's Ben.. that's how they did all their older videos. At least it's not just words on a screen.
Aren't all shores of Antartica NORTHERN shores?
+Steven Kenniff The Antarctic Peninsula has an eastern shore and a western shore. Weddell Sea also has eastern and western shores - so does the Ross Sea, etc.
Most people know next to nothing about Antarctica - they convince themselves that it's a big blob of ice and snow on a continent.
Antarctica is not a continent. It's a group of island mountains, mostly covered by snow and ice which extends out over the sea water and connects with the ice and snow on the other islands, which creates the illusion that Antarctica is a continent.
Greenland is also a group of island mountains covered by ice and snow.
But all this is stuff they don't want you to know.
I swear the the tone in this guys voice is more monotone than siri
oh, typo, my mistake.. I wanted to see "strange mops"
The voice is awesome!
Lol...I so fuckin love reading the comments section. Its so many undiscovered comedians in this world man I swear. Gets me every time....Had a bad day..Just go to UA-cam and read the comments..Shit is actually more entertaining than the fucking videos..lol
+Jahsire Williams yes, yes, u just want to be entertained……SQUIRREL
Say what? Wzup though?
Not sure to what you meant by the squirrel comment...But I dont do online shit bruh and I dont argue, especially with men. So...If you have some beef or issue with what I have stated and feel the need to want to vent...Do so as a man in my face and from behind the mask by yourself. If not, then you are indeed a coward and your statement is the exact reason I said that the comments section is entertaining.
Jahsire Williams u laugh at ppl like me and my ilk, so i laugh bk.
i responded to ur vent/attack!
u ever think the mask serves a purpose? all those ppl marching and for what…
Oh, ok..I thought that was meant in a negative way. Thats why I dont like messages without speaking to a person because sometimes it has no tone. Lol. So if you didnt mean it in a negative way, you know the squirrel shit, then ill apologize for the other statement that I said as a man. But yes..I laugh every day at the comedians online. People are very funny and some dont even know it.
Well howstuffworks just went down a notch on my book
That voice made me sleepy....
same.. im barely awake
leave me alone. leave my son alone
"From UFOs, ghosts to psychic powers, the world is riddled with unfounded bullshit claims". There, fixed it for you.
Very good video.... What program you use? is fantastic...!!!
I would like to never hear that narrator ever again.
+Paul Stefanini Never watch anymore of their videos! "Problem" solved!
Yeah, you're 'clever'. 9.9
is that a troll thing or ?
+Mario Wendorf it's a troll
+Paul Stefanini I second that
why is this video not longer?? Is that it, this was like a sampling of some good knowledge !
"The northern shores of Antartica."
... Doesn't really narrow it down, just sayin.
That is what I thought when I heard that. All shores of Antarctica are northern shores. LOL
The northern shore of Antarctica? Wouldn't all Antarctica shores be northern?
Conspiracy is not a theory, it is a proven fact. Conspiracy exists, on many levels. The question is: How deep does the rabbit hole go? And do we really want to know? Or will our atrophied minds balk when confronted with truth which shatters our preconceived notions?
conspiracy is indeed not a theory. but a conspiracy theory is.
it is just a theory.
and the fun with theories is that it has no limits or boundaries. the rabbit hole can go as deep as your imagination allows it to.
Very intriguing and informative I like the body of ancient maps contrast to the present
some old maps even show ocean depths before sonar times
+Chris Barreira They had no technology back then - everybody knows that - so what if ancient texts around the world describe their technologies - so what if the ancient Babylonians had a furnace that could be turned up seven times its normal setting - so what if they had aircraft, so what if they could slice through mountains all across this Earth and transport gigantic boulders and erect the boulders in geometrically-precise positions... they were primitive people.
Yes. Saw it
@@WhirledPublishing what I think is we’ve been on the planet for longer then documented , and every so often we get wiped out by a natural event. Only few survive and have to start over again inventing new technologies because all was lost during the catastrophe. That’s why Elon musks idea of multi planetary is good to preserve our species. Maybe in the past we’ve already became multi planetary and those alien crafts we see are other humans from millions of years ago. They’ve just kept evolving. Anything could happen. Anything’s possible
@@b-rare Do not even talk to me.
@@WhirledPublishing lol okay . Turn off notifications princess
@ HowStuffWorks ~ Thank you so much for bringing this to us! Namaste!
The narrator sounds like a machine.
Stuff They Don't Want You To Know- THESE VIDEOS ARE ADDICTIVE!
I have spent 5 straight hours watching these videos. I'm supposed to be looking for a job.
Oops! I seem to have wondered into the crazy part of town!
Dude you just blow my mind i just watched 2 of your vids crazy man finally some one else thinks beyond of what there keeping from us
oh god.. another video that " they dont want you to know" shit??
yet here you are just to comment, adding to their view count. smart move ...
Purge More individuals need to comment like yours..
LOL
Christopher Spohr Indeed.
Colton Hooke I think the point is the ignorance of the comment in the first place.
Our earlier ancestors having better navigational knowledge and travelling vast distances across the oceans is widely accepted, we know that the Austronesians started criss crossing the Pacific as early as 10,000BC and possibly even later. We know Bronze Age Europeans traded across the whole of the Mediterranean and further and that the Vikings crossed the Atlantic regularly, its no stretch to imagine that there might be some truth to some of these maps.
OMG, the droning, monotone narration made this too difficult to watch. I need coffee now.
I actually find his voice relaxing.
oral tradition is actually very reliable.
Esp. when embedded in ritual, like folk music yes, think of nursery rhymes ;-)
Or first hand accounts. There would be multiple witnesses all telling the same story and correcting each other.
+Tusk Bilasimo And fairy tales are reliable too... all those wonderful stories about non-humans wanting to "marry" the virgin maiden...
Beauty and the Beast...
the Frog Prince...
100 years ago, an illustrator depicted the "beast" as a green lizard... a very reliable source of information...
It shows the northern shore of antarctica? Where's the southern shore then?
I would understand someone referring to the western or eastern shore, but you may as well replace the phrase "the northern shore of antarctica" with "the shore of antarctica."
You are saying that a map from the 1500s is more accurate than tadays ? behave
Could be...but here's some food for thought. The map of the world taught in school up until say...the year 2000 was......wrong. Look up Mercator vs Gall-Peters.
Gary Brown, why not? how about, Peters vs Mercator maps,,?? very true, if you research.. and we are only talking about distorted content here,, why not could there be maps showing more than what we are shown now? en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gall%E2%80%93Peters_projection
I think this is going into the direction of a conspiracy haha
@Gary Brown: That would be impossible, since today's maps are constructed from direct satellite imaging, which gives THE TRUTH as to the geography of the Earth, and if you compare these maps with the current satellite maps, and are _Honest_ about the comparison, you'll find they do in fact differ, meaning the earlier maps are wrong.
Find it funny that the map that supposedly shows "Antarctica" also _fails_ to show the east coast of North America correctly! I think the "skeptics" are right here, and as usual, the "conspiracy theorists" are wrong. Someone said "What do you call 'alternative medicine' that's been proven to work? Medicine." I'd suggest: "What do you call 'conspiracy theories' that have been proven true? History."
Tise Ignite That would require some very extensive geological change in the past 2,500 years, which is pretty much impossible. You can't move continental plates that fast. The friction would melt the entire crust. Nothing would be alive on Earth today. Contrary to what some people popularly believe, the crust of the Earth does not float atop liquid, but instead sits upon "rock wax". That's what the mantle is like: a waxy *solid*, not a liquid. Besides, there's no source of energy that would accomplish such a movement. Finally, there's no trace of such change in the geological record.
@mike4ty4 Todays maps are often marine navigation maps, period,, scientist use different kind of maps depending on the info they need, (surface info, navigation info etc)... Its not that one is false and the other is more accurate,, its that the representation of what earth looks like is a rendering, not an actual depiction of earth,, so maps are always (even when mapped trough satellite photo) an illustration of reality,, unless youve been into space, (or on some very good spacestation footage) no one knows how earth really looks like.. its an aprochimation... I was shocked to see that landmasses look different according to which maps (computation, scales etc) where used ... yet this distorted reality has been promoted as if it was the truth and only truth .. The question and main topic
remains,, how could this old PR map, contain near satellite accurate info?
In regards the Piri Reis map. Yes the map does imply that the bottom coast is Antarctica , but if you have a moment and read Dr Hapgood's theory on Earth crust Displacement (a key premise of the film 2012). One of the small islands is the Falkland islands. Along with what is now Nova Scotia, that has significantly moved from Besides Florida in the map (look for the key's not the Fallious! However my best guess is that it's still south America. Given that it's curved around.
First a bottle of valium then voice-over a video XD
the graphic ''Triangle Map'' shown is very likely an aerial photo of a USA military island base from the era between WW2 [when radar became ouvert] & 1980 [when satellites covered the same ground]. Such remote sea bases could consist of only a "radar shack" + 2 or 3 short airstrips fitted onto a tiny atoll. See 'Kwajelain Atoll' for the largest of these.
dude, might be interesting but we'll never know, your monotone is killer
I love this series. I think I've watched every episode.
Here are the facts:
I ate 5 pounds of suicide hot wings, they make my eyes water, and they give me heart burn. With drool pouring out of my mouth like a water fountain. Which makes me sweat like I'm having a heart attack.
Here's where it gets crazy:
My colon couldn't bare the build up of gas, so I ran to the bathroom to take a huge mondo dump. I was screaming in pain as my asshole burns. While sitting on the jon for 1 hour yelling "bloody Jesus, Mary, and Joseph!" I tried flushing the toilet and it over flowed. I told my parents that ISIS did this.
Is it just a fringe conspiracy? Is it really violent terrorists planning to overflow everyone's toilets? Or is it something, that they _don't want you to know..._
That triangle island map/photo is one of the islands we took from Japan WWII. It is from then and only about 80 years old.
Where are my"reply to" and "show comment" links this sucks! Not good UA-cam!
UA-cam done goofed...
Cartographers were highly specialized and protected people in the ancient world, and they rarely collected their own data. Rather, they spoke with ship navigators and other cartographers to source their were so the large amount of 'hearsay' made for a very relative definition of 'good maps'. ALSO, maps were the state secrets of their time, the best maps were kept to the government and their friends and at sea the navigator and ships captain were the only ones who had access. When the ship was compromised the maps were the first things destroyed before they surrendered/scuttled their vessel...so not many old maps remain.
Was the narrator incredibly bored with the subject matter , or just stoned off his ass?
I don't like the "spooky" narration. Plus I've watched other vids from this channel, and usually there is a lot of unconfirmed "facts" and disproven evidence that they feature because it is interesting
WuCurdy it gets annoying because they hook you in and THEN once you're hooked they reveal to you that it was a false i.e. pranks, no evidence, disproved theory... it's very aannoying
Driveby Nerfing i do like their spooky style
From Wikipedia: Dyslexia is difficulty in learning to read fluently and with accurate comprehension. This includes difficulty with phonological awareness, phonological decoding, processing speed, orthographic coding, auditory short-term memory, *language skills/verbal comprehension*, and/or rapid naming.
you could do without the cheesy alien music
And the monotone voice putting me to sleep
Stephen LeFevre
and getting on my nerves. Perhaps it's my autism, but i couldn't even hear the info b/c of it.
Also learn how to correctly pronounce foreign words and names...
Stephen LeFevre I'm going to put this on my headphones in bed tonight,should have the deepest sleep I've had for a long time.
the music is just fine, what does it scare you little baby.
Look at it this way: in almost all religious texts, as well as a huge number of authentic and important historical records, there exists legends of an advanced or utopian society: Atlantis, the Garden of Eden, etc. Given, it may not be that there was once a civilization that technically speaking, was more advanced or perfect than ours, but the existence of so many legends from all over the world about similar societies, to me, definitely shows that there were some advanced cities in the past.
Has this narrator got the most boring voice in the world? I was falling asleep within seconds of watching this.
He sounds.. TOO serious.. I think if he tried, he could put himself to sleep
Geoff Worner Cure to insomnia found -- see, one person's problem is an other person's solution. :)
go to bed then
they are probably hoping to hypnotize you ...it's one of the only ways they might convince anyone with this shit lol
what about the mercator map? if i remember right, it depicts antarctica with mountains, streams, grass and such.
I wonder who pays this guy.
1:36 Where is this? It looks like a section of the St. James Cathedral complex.
history is not written by the victors, its written by the survivors.
Mr. God no its not, because if you choose to leave (aka be a coward/retreat to more enemies than you can handle) a battle then there is no winner, or loser. if you choose not to play a game then you cant win or lose. simple as that. most the time its written by the victors yes, but not every time.
shut up
Sadyh Von Schattig why because you cant deny this truth? so you can just be one of the people who always thinks that people on youtube are wrong when sometimes their right?
TheHellblazer117 Yeah but if you're not involved in the battle you wouldn't know the small details that the victors might want to change.
abdulrsno1 that is true, however i have an example, you could argue that they lost, but they became history, thus shattering the theory that victors always write history(this was true with the greeks and romans and such, but nowadays it isnt): the jews in the holocaust who survived. they survived, yeah they lost everything and you could argue they were losers, but still became history, and a big part of that timeline. the diary of ann frank a person who died obivously was one of the majors, yet despite her dying still became history.
Love this channel. Thought I had subscription but it must have been the other channel. The best part not included in the video. "True life really is STRANGER than fiction." If you don't believe me, just stay alive for awhile longer. "Not far, Yoda not far." Amazing things are just the other side of the horizon.
All conspiracy theorists just see what they want and ignore the rest, it's really frustrating. If they didn't do this, then there would far fewer conspiracy theories, but with a stronger and more credible set of evidence. Then people might take them a bit more seriously.
"All conspiracy theorists" *and* people who make sweeping generalizations by placing people into artificial categories
do not help us very much.
It is very human to see "just what we want to see."
Ignoring the levels of mercury in lakes and rivers that lead to locally caught fish being unsafe to
eat is one example of how people "only see what they want to."
Nobody is ranting about coal being a "conspiracy" - because there is no need to distract people
who are not paying attention to begin with.
Conspiracy theorist then?
Jonny Harding Nope. Never been much into herd mentalities of any kind. Interesting to study from aloof, but not usually going deep enough in the pursuit for personal understanding. Both have their place. Just like any data we come into contact with, it ultimately gives us the greatest gift when we learn something from it. Testing the limits of what we can see & know, allows us to better approximate the "big picture" in terms
of probabilities. Many of our personal convictions come down to a position that we find ourselves taking on one side of a probability. I am not a "conspiracy" theorist but when I hear a good story, I will sometimes take a look. Look at how much has been covered up in the past, in our recent past and the ancient past. There have always been major disconnects between the "playing field" known to different classes of citizens; their database of current on-goings would not
put them in a position to make informed judgments or decisions as those at the top 10% or less- and as long as secrets are easily kept, there will be hidden things revealed. But there is a lot of complete garbage and bullshit out there that I wish I had known more about a long time ago.
I watch a lot of conspiracy videos myself, however always find them to be based on solely speculative evidence which is presented as fact- and with this I do mean all the time. That's what annoys me if more arguments were based on sound or at least credible evidence, then voices would be heard more and there wouldn't be any kind of grouping of conspiracy theorists either.
Jonny Harding Exactly. There are valid finding which do raise important questions, but people are more interested in making money
(ATTN: ancient aliens) and making outlandish claims. Sometimes I hope that more honest researchers will continue to ask questions
(and they are, in regards to things such as the dating of the Sphinx), but the sad part is there is so much time & energy put towards supporting their "agendas" instead of simply following the evidence where-ever it leads.
It is truly frustrating and holding us back!
*
*
*
Great videos, if you can, try to take pauses to give us viewers time to let it sink in and wrap our minds around the ideas. Other than that, keep up the good work!!
*
*
*
please change the tone it's impossible to listen!
Veronica Cioaric - how about you just shut up?
There are actually a surprising number of maps with "anomalies". There's more than 1 map showing "atlantis" at exactly that location, of of them was found in south america. However, there are even more maps showing the detailed shore (under the ice) of antarctica.
I would like to have a proper and complete documentation, could you get me a list of must-read and watch please ?
The stuff they don’t want you to know is that the Piri Reis map was only one of several ancient maps that show the Western Hemisphere. Columbus followed some of these maps when he crossed ocean.
The advantage of a fiat currency is in theory to match the expansion of the money supply with the expansion of economic output rather than having the money supply expand arbitrarily whenever a Yukon Cornelius strikes gold. This helps prevent unwanted inflation from rapid, unexpected changes in the money supply. The gold standard can become deflationary during a time of economic expansion due to its inelasticity and ultimately put a damper on growth
You forgot to mention how the Piri Reis map was actually cross-checked by the Navy in the early 1950's, and it was shown to be a quite accurate depiction of what the land under Antarctica would have looked like....
are you watching primarily the "...don't want you to know" vids or the "how stuff works" vids? So far, I've stuck to the STDWYTK playlist.
All of the adverts I've seen are blank screens with no audio. Finally youtube is messing up in a good way!
@1:23, where is this place? In Istanbul?? Can anyone tell me where it is specifically, thanks.
you are good in making up good sci-fi stories. you should go into film directing or star writing books
I've seen a few Medieval maps of the known world with Latin references to cold temperature zones in both the north and the south and couldn't help but to wonder how could they have known this without having sailed to Antarctica. When you think of what was known during this era, one would imagine maps showing warmth as one travels south. These maps only consisted of the Middle East, Europe, Eurasia, and Northern Africa, yet they had reference to a frigid zone in both the north and the south!
Almost like they had satellites.
Can anyone tell me what this triangle shape island is? At start and at 1:41? Thanks.
Actually, the fed is subject to congressional oversight.
In fact, back in the days of gold standard, there was a major economic collapse every few years, there have only been 3 since the introduction of federal banking
with our current form of media and information that is available people seem to forget that in those old days being objective about anything was not common. this leads to everything written and drawn being a work of its author with his interpretation about something, and when he didn't know a certain thing he would probably just have made it up.
I believe I read about this map in the book called "secrets of the lost race" by Rene Noorbergen
Pretty mind blowing stuff!
The fact you define our society as advanced just proves how much you really know about the truth about how advanced we really are. The elites prevent us from that luxury.
So...does the Piri Riess map show Antarctica or South America,both coastlines,while somewhat similar are`nt the same.
There are maps that show the outline of Antarctica that are hundreds of years old (at least) and the actual mapping of Antarctica was not done until a few decades ago because of the ice that covers the land. Such information comes from civilizations that are no longer around on this planet, but they were at one time. The evidence comes from deep within the earth, coal mines and such, and these artifacts tell of what once was on our planet, and what will happen again someday...destruction.
Even if there are lost civilizations. who were quite advanced back in the day, how does this affect us in the here and now?
Sure it's unfortunate that ancient industrial age civilizations could have existed and most all evidence of them could have been wiped out. but why would anyone withing academia (or in any position of power) want to cover that up?
there could be allot of reasons why powerful people cover things up.. With power comes corruption. Not saying that the maps we see today is not real.
They would still have the stone structures we built, mount rushmore, stonehenge, plastic water bottles, strip mines, etc. It would be really really difficult to erase all of the evidence of us.
also on the Piri Reis map, the Falklands are shown and they were said to be filled with monsters!
It sounds almost monotone, there's little emphasis or pause, and it sounds slightly altered, either digitally or physically.
I for one do believe there was a Ancient civilisation or civilisations that existed thousands of years ago that had travelled most of the known world, but I wonder whatever had happened to them?, I'm still kind of skeptical about it but it is very interesting.
I have an explanation for the map: it was dated inaccurately. Constantinople was conquered by Turks a little later than we think, only after the conquista. The Greeks had maps from the Spaniards showing the America they had just discovered and conquered.
Of all of these, I'm most inclined to believe the Piris Reis map because it could fit into biblical history. After the Flood, the frequent volcanic activity created a perpetually cool climate due to all of the soot in the atmosphere. Warm oceans, a result of the Flood, evaporated and deposited moisture on the land. This caused a buildup of ice and lowered sea levels, potentially even exposing land bridges between continents. This would aid humans in recolonizing Earth after the Flood.
What do you mean by "stronger consciousness"?
People need to take into consideration that the earth is constantly though very slowly changing. Hawaii is a chain of volcanic islands that is moving north, in some places land got swallowed up by rivers or oceans, continents pull away or smash into each other. Perhaps these "strange maps" were what the earth use to look like at that time but has changed since then.
Within the "accepted" age of human beings on this planet capable of making maps, the earth has not changed that much - something capable of producing such earth shaping change in such a short geological period would have probably been disastrous for humanity, such as a global flood of biblical proportion.
The map is not the territory
The trouble with most of humanity in general is that we believe what we want to believe, and this is no exception with anybody. Society wants to believe that we are more advanced than we ever have been in the past, so the ones that control the knowledge we have are repeatedly squashing anything that could prove that we're no better than we were in the past. That's pretty much why society isn't making any massive advancements with its attitudes towards issues and knowledge that we don't agree with.
I have this freaky feeling that we as civilization have been around far longer than we anticipated or that we're at least missing an important part. It would explain isolated areas having similar knowledge and seems a bit mor likely than aliens to me for some reason.
Anyone know the name of the background music?
The narrator of this video talks like a 9th grader unwillingly presenting his Powerpoint presentation to the class.
Here's where it gets crazy....
At :50 is that Grace Jones on the left?