China Delistings?

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 28 вер 2024
  • The United States and China appear to have reached a landmark deal that would allow Chinese companies to remain listed on US exchanges, halting the threatened delisting of about 200 stocks that trade in New York.
    The announcement by US and Chinese regulators is a breakthrough after a prolonged standstill. Beijing has not allowed foreign regulators to inspect Chinese company audits, citing a desire to protect state secrets. US law requires Chinese companies to leave American stock exchanges if they do not comply with the countries audit rules.
    The US Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, announced on Friday that it would have the power to select the companies, audit engagements and potential violations it inspects and investigates, without consulting Chinese authorities.
    Patrick's Books:
    Statistics For The Trading Floor: amzn.to/3eerLA0
    Derivatives For The Trading Floor: amzn.to/3cjsyPF
    Corporate Finance: amzn.to/3fn3rvC
    Patreon Page: / patrickboyleonfinance
    Visit our website: www.onfinance.org
    Follow Patrick on Twitter Here: / patrickeboyle
    Patrick Boyle On Finance Podcast:
    Spotify: open.spotify.c...
    Apple: podcasts.apple...
    Google Podcasts: tinyurl.com/62...
    Join this channel to support making this content:
    / @pboyle

КОМЕНТАРІ • 441

  • @PBoyle
    @PBoyle  2 роки тому +43

    Thanks to our growing list of Patreon Sponsors and Channel Members for supporting the channel. www.patreon.com/PatrickBoyleOnFinance
    : Marc De Mesel, Nate Stapleton,Timothy Baird, WIlam, Hernan Merino, Random Encounter, Nieuwsbrief Ikwil, Bee Positive Consulting, hyunjung Kim, John Cadena, Ian Tracey, Callum McLean, Oscar, Simon Pena, Ed, Pavle Obradovic, Erik Van Ekelenburg, David O'Connor, Pjotr Bekkering, Alex, Robert W Proudfoot, Robert Muller, Andre Michel, Ivan Iliev, Gopaljee Atulya, Mark Hooker, Artem Vasenin, P H, Sebastian, Michal Lacko, Peter Bočan, Michael Pierce, V Jordan, Gil, HalfwitHam, Mark Brophy, Patrick T, David Urdenata, Juan Valdez, Bruce Roberts, Chad Norman, Bruce Roberts, Shamikh Rana, Friday Guy, Marc De Mesel, Augusto Ramos, Soy Boomer Doomer, Bob Slartabartfast, Robert Feiler, Camil Dbouk, Erik Montesinos, Matthew Loos, Az Indragiri, Aman Bali, Lautaro Parada, Pratap, Deborah Joseph, Robin Sung, Kurt Johnston, Dominik Auerbach, Gurmeet Kaushal, John Hall, Dara Mo, Josef Goergen, Wilbert Cheng, Daniel Talero, Jaroslav Tupý, Trevor Lucey JB Weld, Alex, Carlos Figuera, Peter Pomelov, Null065, Rick Thor, MeBerzerk, Henry Nguyen, Sola F, The Collier, Carlos Mejia, J Wadia, Bitcoin OG, easy boekhouding, Albert, Eugene Jung, Daniel Cervini, Jonathon Yong, Iris Ji, Emil Nicolaie Perhinschi, Charles, Eli Auto, Excks, Michael Li, Par Hedman, Praveen Mishra, Gerard Scott, joel köykkä, Areeb Ahmed, David Wang, Yazan Qaraqish, Rodolfo Cornetti, Daniel Winroth, johnny, Nick Jerrat, Chris Houston, Alastair Currie, Robert Griffin, Andrei, zizi Golo, Fab Vida, Constantin Petrenco, pawel irisik, NotAScam, James Halliday, 22 Dust, Carsten Baukrowitz, Heinrich, Arron T, Ben Brown, Stephen Mortimer (to The Moon), Ryan B. Hicks, Liam, Logan Vrankovic, William Heaton, Paul McCourt, Daniel, Aaryan Koura, Steven, Christopher Boersma, Ulf Lundblad, Dorothy Watson, Greg Blake, Simon Bone, Livermores Quant, The Collier Report, Scott Gardner, The Man Koala, Brian McCullough, Daniel S. Smith, Finance Student, Julie, Mohammad Rehman, James Wallace, Daniel Poellmann, Edosa Odigie, Dixon Yuen, Marek Novák, Stamatis Drepaniotis Michael Smith, Ahmed Hamadto, Chris Davey, Mike Farmwald, Michael A. Mayo, Lachezar Georgiev, Kamet Batra, Bradley Johnson, Sagar Gudi, Michael Chessar, Kate ATL, Tong Cheung, Lady Dje, James Barnes, Chris Hall, Kurt Johnston, ICBM Catcher Juan Valdes, KernelSC, Linn Engström, Veltsh, Konrad P-kala, Pastacat, Adam Vorting, Matthew McQuade, Christopher Lesner, freebird, Kenneth WedMore Lund, erfective, Jason Young, Jonathan Kopnick, Peter Hendrickson, steel, Bastien, Tom Willett, Chris Whitehead, Anil Jason, JOJO, AS7, Greg Thatcher, Ezekiel Templin, MrLuigi1138 Grecia Bate, Leszek Frankowski, Nam Nguyen, Goutham, Karim THIBAULT, C, David R. Ingemi, Robert Wave, Dmitri Alexeev, Aaron Rose, Ethan Hernandez, Claude Chevroulet, Adrian, Stephan Marosvary, Louis Julien, Jan Lukas Kiermeyer, Gearoid O Connor, Fredrick Saupe, Subliminal Transformation, Alex McMahon, Adi, Ben, Kurt Mueller, Joaquin Madruga, Janusz Wieczorek, Federico Viscomi, Corgi, Mahdi, Burgerinn, Quinn Cone, QiKaiQian, Stephen, Joshua Rosenthal, Frank Yashar, Michael Smith, Emilian Marius Tudor, Julian Aßmann, Cormac, Ian Shearer, Theodosius the Elder, Michael Kopřiva, Tinni, Goran Milivojevic, chris, Joe Del Vicario, Alexandre Mah, ultima9, Norman A. Letterman, maRiano polidoRi, Stephan Prinz, Gary Yrag, Mattia Midali, Matthew Berry, Ann Williams, Jay T, Gabor, Florian Haas, Shivendra Saklani, Zachary Tu, Jeffrey, Lane Alan Deyoe, Chett Flynn Jonathan Horn, Mo Herbert, Lane Andrews, Justin Thuet, Olaf Thiele, Ivan Ilaev, Todd Gross, Douglas Caldwell, Wade Hobbs, Volodymyr Palii, James Hoctor, Gavotti SGP, Ryne Davis, Jean-Philippe Lemoussu, Keanu Thierolf, Grizzly Grey Bear, Muhammad, Michael Chow, Stefan Alexander, James Blandford, Miroslav Ognyanov, Scott Guthery, Vanya Davidenko, Arto Karhu, James Bache, Jason Harner, Dale Patch, Stefan Penner, Mischa Trunz, Arvid, Eric, Jonathan Metter, Junhong Low, John Way, Maria Baker, Luke Solomon, Sharath Vulupala, Keith Elkin, Chris Nicholl, Luis Carmona, Vinci Chan, Olivier, Yasha, James Yoh, Eduardo Martinez, Adi Blue, Swain Gant, georgejr, hyeora, Brian, old gambling art bag, Boussaken, Lukas Braszus, Vik, Chris Albertson, Sprite_tm, Keith, Anurag Kumar, matt f, Douglas Caldwell, Ryan Stewart-Gardnier, Adgn, Ronald London, Chris Rock, Tuan Nguyen Minh, Daniel Baak, Ida Sanchez, Jeremy King, Maria, Julien Debache, M1, Dougald Middleton, Tom, MrChaos42, Diarmuid Kelly, Subodh Kafle, Gregory Mahoney, Angelo Rauseo, Christopher De La Cruz, Kirsten Banuelos, Ryne Davis, Era, Anne Molphy, Ekaterina Lukyanets, Alfred, sugarfrosted, Okkie, rswaggs, Larry, Sarah, miilo, EatEmAll, Alexandre GUYAMIER-CROISSANT, Alex C, Dan Challas, Tobias Kunkel, Henk S, Pinky Liu, Noel Kurth, John Tran, Daniel Soderberg, Daniel Ralea, Jann Tucek, Steve Crotti, Micah Stott, Shaun Deanesh, Duy Tran, Jacob Ceferin, DaFlesh,Nathan McIntosh, Dominique Buri, Marcelo Melchionna Torres, Florian, B P, Bortolini Thomas, Manmeet Sheera, Stephen Walker, Richard Stagg, Bo Grünberger, Justin Sublette, Glasphemy, Zackk and Yoshinao Kumagai

    • @OdaSwifteye
      @OdaSwifteye 2 роки тому +2

      You're going to run out of characters eventually.

  • @joeyjo-jojuniorshabadoo6827
    @joeyjo-jojuniorshabadoo6827 2 роки тому +128

    "...and I *was* human." -- Zuck. That gave me a chuckle.

    • @tsijr915
      @tsijr915 2 роки тому

      A bit creepy he said that without much content (was he talking about Metaverse?)

    • @antonystringfellow5152
      @antonystringfellow5152 2 роки тому +14

      @@tsijr915 No, this was a few years ago.
      "... but it is going to bother you because you're human and I was human ..." LOL!

    • @shaunoconnell9506
      @shaunoconnell9506 2 роки тому +5

      🐊

  • @nfuryboss
    @nfuryboss 2 роки тому +84

    There's nothing to prevent Chinese audit firms from selectively massaging/redacting financial data even with the deal
    The best way forward is to delist the firms from US exchange and let those who wish to take the risk to buy and trade on the HK exchange.
    On HK soil, PCAOB is unlikely to have the freedom or flexibility to look around if they have to validate or investigate some financial transactions/data further.

    • @dhirajmeenavilli5508
      @dhirajmeenavilli5508 2 роки тому +5

      That's a fair point except not everyone has access to HK exchanges and also the big firms like Alibaba, and Baidu that are getting audited have as their auditors big American Audit companies like PwC. It's just the Chinese arm of that firm. So do you believe that the Chinese arm of an American company will lie to the PCAOB if an audit occurs?

    • @Football__Junkie
      @Football__Junkie 2 роки тому +16

      Agreed. If you get their financial statements, it will be false information anyways.

    • @tsijr915
      @tsijr915 2 роки тому +1

      Yeah smart but not smart. No one is going to pay $200-600 a month to get data feed to trade on HK markets. So this would be voided if it happened (meaning it would be useless for international trade)

    • @MysteryKmt
      @MysteryKmt 2 роки тому +7

      @@Football__Junkie it's not like American market is the most transparent tbh

    • @Tounguepunchfartbox
      @Tounguepunchfartbox 2 роки тому +6

      @@dhirajmeenavilli5508 yes. Some of these companies don’t even trust their own Chinese arms lol.

  • @Mjsmecha
    @Mjsmecha 2 роки тому +56

    We'll see how this goes. I just don't see Chinese CCP officials being willing to tolerate U.S. based or employed auditors looking for bad accounting practices by Chinese companies. If a company in the U.S. like an Enron is exposed for shenanigans its a failure of that company's governance or its auditors. In an authoritarian regime where companies are seen as tendrils of the government, a bad finding is a mark against the CCP's facade of strength and knowing what's best for their citizens. This seems like an appeasement tactic to buy time for China while its economy is hurting. I don't see auditing standards improving while Xi is in charge.

    • @jpjay1584
      @jpjay1584 2 роки тому

      it's simple as this: Chinese will do everything not to pay tax. so every book is cooked to the max.
      second: they will inflate numbers if necessary (also to the max)
      on a waaaaay more extreme level that the Western world. (even Chinese don't trust Chinese)
      any audit will be flawed as there is no tomorrow. if one thinks the audits can be trusted one would be very naive.

    • @Glitter_H_Hoof
      @Glitter_H_Hoof 2 роки тому

      what about the continued existence of amway?

  • @mmytacist
    @mmytacist 2 роки тому +1

    well done explanation. the only podcaster where I don't increase the playback speed

  • @bjorn6084
    @bjorn6084 2 роки тому +2

    notice the "stonks man" figurine in the bottom right-hand corner of the video on his shelf.

  • @glennchartrand5411
    @glennchartrand5411 2 роки тому +4

    Every company in China is required to have a CCP member on the board of directors who can unilaterally over-rule the board of directors.
    That includes the auditing firms.
    So when Xi Jinping sets economic goals...those numbers get met.
    Everything in China is high risk because you have no idea whats really going on.

  • @BladeTheWatcher
    @BladeTheWatcher 2 роки тому +2

    Come on, why would it be different this time? Did anything change? If anything, relations are even worse!
    The Chinese are just stalling. Look at what happened to Evergrande investors and don't invest in China if you want to get any money back!

    • @davianoinglesias5030
      @davianoinglesias5030 2 роки тому

      atleast the state will compensate them, who compensated the losers of the 2007/2008 real estate crash in the US?

  • @rogerbritus9378
    @rogerbritus9378 2 роки тому +8

    What a quality and outstanding content you put out through this channel. Excellent work!

  • @billybaaa2871
    @billybaaa2871 2 роки тому +2

    Awesome analysis

  • @cosmokramer7708
    @cosmokramer7708 2 роки тому +2

    PCAOB - the auditor’s auditor 😎

    • @Mikster_Mindo
      @Mikster_Mindo 2 роки тому

      Fraud the PCAOB? So you have chosen death.

  • @davidwelty9763
    @davidwelty9763 2 роки тому +40

    I am guessing this is just a stalling tactic. It is unlikely they will be able to audit what they want.

    • @samsonsoturian6013
      @samsonsoturian6013 2 роки тому +7

      Mass delistings will ensue.

    • @asdisskagen6487
      @asdisskagen6487 2 роки тому +5

      Exactly - this is a common tactic for the CCP.

    • @GUNNYCANUCK
      @GUNNYCANUCK 2 роки тому

      @@samsonsoturian6013 When, after another decade of fraud?

    • @Random_dud31
      @Random_dud31 2 роки тому +1

      @@asdisskagen6487 Is delisting chinse stocks from foreign market really that common?

    • @Nick-rr3pv
      @Nick-rr3pv 2 роки тому +4

      I've been living in Beijing for 6 years now. I have a fiend who's father retired few years ago. He worked as an auditor for one very powerful branch of finance ministry. He was responsible of auditing largest Chinese companies. All of them government owned off course. Oil company, construction companies, banks and so on.
      When my friend was getting married, he had to provide complete list of the guests who will attend the wedding to his boss so that no one gives them bribe disguised as wedding gifts.
      When he retired he had to give his passport to the government so that he is unable to travel abroad. Because someone could bribe him, kidnap him or lure him in any other way to give in the secrets of their economy. And since he worked in very powerful branch he knows all the details about their financial state.
      So he is in his mid 60s and prohibited from leaving anywhere. And of course he cannot trade on Chinese financial markets.
      This short story tells you a lot how they operate.

  • @agripinamanchures7211
    @agripinamanchures7211 2 роки тому

    Happy bday to my responsible and loving husband 😛😛😛more good health and more bday to come..simple message lng ako no drama...😁😁 happy bday and godbless. LV u♥️♥️♥️😘😘

  • @cases2939
    @cases2939 2 роки тому +5

    Isn't agreeing to this deal just a symptom of Chinese desperation for Capital? Grab what investment they can, and take the money and run?

    • @cases2939
      @cases2939 2 роки тому +2

      What assurance can we possibly have that they will follow through on their side of the agreement?

    • @samsonsoturian6013
      @samsonsoturian6013 2 роки тому +1

      People can skip town, countries can't.

    • @cases2939
      @cases2939 2 роки тому +6

      @@samsonsoturian6013 You assume the CCP is playing by the same rule book as the rest of the world.

    • @samsonsoturian6013
      @samsonsoturian6013 2 роки тому

      @@cases2939 yes, but a country's predatory behaviors work much differently than an individual's

  • @Fr.VeniceLAI
    @Fr.VeniceLAI 2 роки тому +3

    Opine, with all evidences gathered, the conclusion can only be : Invest in CPC-China's companies' equities & bonds, at one's own peril. The warning signs and signals are all present, only the Risk - Seeking continues ...

  • @mattanderson6672
    @mattanderson6672 2 роки тому

    Thanks Patrick

  • @HectorChamizo11
    @HectorChamizo11 2 роки тому +183

    |

    • @richardcole2432
      @richardcole2432 2 роки тому

      I'm just shocked you mentioned Expert Margaret thought am the only one trading with her

    • @richardcole2432
      @richardcole2432 2 роки тому

      I was so surprised how she recovered my huge losses

    • @cutesparkle3228
      @cutesparkle3228 2 роки тому

    • @wilsoncharles3990
      @wilsoncharles3990 2 роки тому

    • @Felix-qe3nr
      @Felix-qe3nr 2 роки тому

      Wow I know Mrs Margaret I met her at a conference in carlifornia 2019 where she introduced us her business strategy, she helped me cover my student loans

  • @rainy_wish_studios
    @rainy_wish_studios 2 роки тому +2

    Maybe they should let Razzelkhan do the auditing as part of her work release?!

  • @thomaskeenan2208
    @thomaskeenan2208 2 роки тому

    The renewal PR , like this video, on differences on audits is good. Investors should be aware! Label the products accordingly. Caveat emptor.

  • @ecstokes1
    @ecstokes1 2 роки тому

    You mentioned companies looking for a market IPO with weak corporate governance, you may recall the Toronto exchange in the 80s and early 90s. Might make a good video.

  • @jacobstein4676
    @jacobstein4676 2 роки тому +1

    Do you do this all in one take? Lol takes a real man to do that

  • @davedimitrov
    @davedimitrov 2 роки тому +1

    State capitalism is an oxymoron. Capitalism requires that capital is held in private entities. You''d be better served by calling it fascism, since all corporations in China are owned by the state

  • @crispycaveman9164
    @crispycaveman9164 2 роки тому

    this channel slaps

  • @pamelahomeyer748
    @pamelahomeyer748 Рік тому

    Chinese companies need to get off of US exchange and there should be full disclosure of Chinese companies because so many people have been hurt by their products or their business systems

  • @fredcdobbs823
    @fredcdobbs823 2 роки тому

    I prognosticate the coin flip to be 95% no pudding proof...

  • @johnpatrick1588
    @johnpatrick1588 2 роки тому +2

    Oh boy, we have the PCAOB in addition to the other wonderful agencies like the SEC, CFTC, FBI, DOJ, IRS, etc. We are in good competent hands I'm sure.

    • @1MinuteFlipDoc
      @1MinuteFlipDoc 2 роки тому

      and it does (like the others) absolutely nothing!

  • @vlaframboise
    @vlaframboise 2 роки тому

    Please, bring your own equipment to analyse ink age on the documents

  • @Dethfeast
    @Dethfeast 2 роки тому

    This is going to be 2013 all over again. They should just delist the Chinese companies, and end this nonsense.

  • @lisalove6327
    @lisalove6327 2 роки тому

    One band one sound 🤝

  • @midgetydeath
    @midgetydeath 2 роки тому

    Back when regulators first stonewalled our auditors, the correct response would have been to tell the CCP that those regulators either hadn’t been told to allow the audits or were trying to undermine the CCP. It would put the commies into a position of either pretending the regulators hadn’t been informed (as a way out) or punishing them for following orders. If they didn’t, then it would embarrass the CCP on the international stage for making a deal and then immediately violating it in such a public way. It’s image being something the CCP cares about greatly.

  • @hwfranjr
    @hwfranjr Рік тому

    LL B.S.,LOL THEY ALREADYMAGREED AND NEVE HELD TO IT,LOL😂😂😂😂😂😂

  • @pal333
    @pal333 2 роки тому +1

    I attempted to cover these topics in 2 videos spanning over an hour and you've just done it succinctly in 15min :D my writing needs to improve

    • @pal333
      @pal333 2 роки тому

      This feedback is invaluable. Thank you so much for putting in the time to provide this :)

    • @pal333
      @pal333 2 роки тому

      For accountability I will note that I aim to improve my enunciation, flow including transitions, any credibility issues, aims and goals, all of which can be improved through better planning.

  • @marshalepage5330
    @marshalepage5330 2 роки тому +1

    What did Zuckerberg mean by he was human?

  • @kunalseth6437
    @kunalseth6437 2 роки тому +1

    👍

  • @kristopherrobin4001
    @kristopherrobin4001 2 роки тому

    Nice

  • @peterwaksman9179
    @peterwaksman9179 2 роки тому

    I appreciate your content but you should know that your deadpan humor is even better.

  • @awdrifter3394
    @awdrifter3394 2 роки тому +7

    Of course Zhou Baiden would allow Chinese companies stay listed.

    • @samsonsoturian6013
      @samsonsoturian6013 2 роки тому +1

      He has no say in the matter

    • @sko1beer
      @sko1beer 2 роки тому +1

      Baiden doesn’t run anything he is just a puppet.
      Nancy the queen has more say

    • @samsonsoturian6013
      @samsonsoturian6013 2 роки тому

      @@sko1beer shut up

  • @katjaofdenmark1246
    @katjaofdenmark1246 2 роки тому

    🙏

  • @tananga1523
    @tananga1523 2 роки тому

    🇺🇦❤️🇺🇦❤️🇺🇦❤️🇺🇦❤️🇺🇦❤️

  • @roaminromer
    @roaminromer 2 роки тому +33

    I feel China is just stringing them along for as long as possible. No way they are gonna look at the books

  • @vlaframboise
    @vlaframboise 2 роки тому

    Please, bring your own equipment to analyse ink age on the documents

  • @Coxman
    @Coxman 2 роки тому +7

    Delist them anyway. They will still hide the truth. Just complete inspections and then delist anyway You can always cite some discrepancy which contravene the PCAOB rules.
    Job done.

  • @slimjimjimslim5923
    @slimjimjimslim5923 2 роки тому +191

    Didi’s financial statement was full of red flag, the Chinese gov did everyone a favor with didi. Any value investor would have spotted didi as a highly speculative company with no real return. But normal folks got fooled because they imagined didi as a Chinese Uber

    • @kevinbarry71
      @kevinbarry71 2 роки тому +65

      Sounds like you did a great job of defining Uber.

    • @mitchtherighteous
      @mitchtherighteous 2 роки тому

      American Chinese investors dont care, they trust their money with Chinese people more than any other race.

    • @SLee-vj4px
      @SLee-vj4px 2 роки тому

      If DiDi is not Chinese Uber, what is DiDi's business? "no real return" - you mean DiDi does not have enough people to user their service in China to be lucratively profitable?

    • @skyak4493
      @skyak4493 2 роки тому

      Didi IS the Chinese uber -a no profit scam based on breaking all pertinent laws and regulations.

    • @slimjimjimslim5923
      @slimjimjimslim5923 2 роки тому +28

      @@kevinbarry71 lol hence why Uber stock is crap. Most people doesn’t realize just because you see a company’s logo all over the street, doesn’t mean that company is profitable.

  • @altonriggs2352
    @altonriggs2352 2 роки тому +14

    Decouple China from Wall Street money. Invest in America..put Americans to work.

    • @lavs8696
      @lavs8696 2 роки тому +6

      𝙐𝙎 𝙣𝙚𝙚𝙙𝙨 𝙩𝙤 𝙙𝙚𝙡𝙞𝙨𝙩 𝘾𝘾𝙋 𝙘𝙤𝙢𝙥𝙖𝙣𝙞𝙚𝙨 𝙛𝙧𝙤𝙢 𝙖𝙡𝙡 𝙤𝙪𝙧 𝙚𝙭𝙘𝙝𝙖𝙣𝙜𝙚𝙨, 𝙘𝙤𝙣𝙛𝙞𝙨𝙘𝙖𝙩𝙚 𝙖𝙡𝙡 𝙡𝙖𝙣𝙙 𝙤𝙬𝙣𝙚𝙙 𝙗𝙮 𝘾𝙝𝙞𝙣𝙚𝙨𝙚 𝙞𝙣𝙫𝙚𝙨𝙩𝙤𝙧𝙨, 𝙖𝙣𝙙 𝙨𝙩𝙧𝙖𝙣𝙜𝙡𝙚 𝙩𝙝𝙚𝙞𝙧 𝙖𝙘𝙘𝙚𝙨𝙨 𝙩𝙤 𝙤𝙪𝙧 𝙘𝙖𝙥𝙞𝙩𝙖𝙡. 𝘾𝙝𝙞𝙣𝙖 𝙞𝙨 𝙬𝙞𝙣𝙣𝙞𝙣𝙜 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙘𝙖𝙥𝙞𝙩𝙖𝙡 𝙬𝙖𝙧, 𝙖𝙣𝙙 𝙞𝙩 𝙞𝙨 𝙖 𝙣𝙖𝙩𝙞𝙤𝙣𝙖𝙡 𝙨𝙚𝙘𝙪𝙧𝙞𝙩𝙮 𝙧𝙞𝙨𝙠 𝙛𝙤𝙧 𝙪𝙨 𝙩𝙤 𝙖𝙘𝙩 𝙗𝙚𝙛𝙤𝙧𝙚 𝙞𝙩'𝙨 𝙩𝙤𝙤 𝙡𝙖𝙩𝙚.

    • @aravindpallippara1577
      @aravindpallippara1577 2 роки тому +1

      I mean in that case shouldn't apple be one of the first casualties?
      They dont majorly use American labour for their hardware manufacturing division at all, relying on Chinese, Taiwanese, Mexican and Indian companies to outsource that?

    • @samsonsoturian6013
      @samsonsoturian6013 2 роки тому

      Weird priority, since virtually all US based large caps are global firms. Americans collectively own half the planet.

    • @sko1beer
      @sko1beer 2 роки тому

      @@aravindpallippara1577 I don’t even think most Tesla cars are made in America anymore

  • @Football__Junkie
    @Football__Junkie 2 роки тому +14

    What does it matter? They will just make up lies about the numbers. So, not getting the data and getting the wrong data are both worthless.

  • @phil20_20
    @phil20_20 2 роки тому +10

    I'll believe it when I see it. It's amazing that the SEC allowed these companies in the first place. Somebody really needs to bust some heads over there.

    • @1MinuteFlipDoc
      @1MinuteFlipDoc 2 роки тому

      with stooge boys like Gary Gensler in charge at the SEC, Wall Street (Goldman, etc) will continue to have their way.

  • @mbg9650
    @mbg9650 2 роки тому +33

    Can China aspire to be an economic behemoth without developed chinese capital markets? For me, the answer is obvious.

    • @tokyomilmil
      @tokyomilmil 2 роки тому

      @Lawofimprobability I can’t help but laugh hard at your comment. oh plz Jack Ma deserves what he gets by all means ! He’s brining THE WORST OF AMERICAN CAPITALISM to China. AKA unscrutinized solicitation of money-lending practice (HAVEN’T WE BANKRUPT ENOUGH PPL ALREADY IN AMERICA ALONE W/ THAT DISGUSTING SUBPRIME MORTGAGE & THE CLASSIC “CREDIT CARD” TRAP?!? ... btw lo & behold!!! now they even have the shame to put out that monstrous atrocity of so-called “pre-pay” service!? I pray this greedy monster would be dead in America ASAP so don’t even think about spread this virus to other nations!!!)

    • @jaydee6268
      @jaydee6268 2 роки тому +2

      @Lawofimprobability He under went a sonic lobotomy so Ma is an entirely compliant citizen now.

  • @guydreamr
    @guydreamr 2 роки тому +60

    Audited or not, anyone investing in a closed, authoritarian country like China is taking a huge risk, pure and simple.

    • @WalterWhiteFootballSharing
      @WalterWhiteFootballSharing 2 роки тому

      Chinese don't invest their life savings into stocks the way Americans do with funds and retirement accounts. They buy 2-3-4th homes. IF CHINAS own people don't trust China's stocks, you're on crack to trust your own retirement on that crap.

    • @WalterWhiteFootballSharing
      @WalterWhiteFootballSharing 2 роки тому

      When American companies lie on the books you get Enron, Worldcom, big news. When Chinese companies lie; good luck with that.

    • @MSportsEngineering
      @MSportsEngineering 2 роки тому +8

      Black and white thinking. Yes, it is all a risk, BUT some risk is greater than others. Live in the grey my friend.

    • @guydreamr
      @guydreamr 2 роки тому +10

      @@MSportsEngineering Which is exactly what I said, so I'm not sure what your point is. "Risk" is the *possibility* of loss of capital in varying degrees, so by definition it is not black or white, but on a continuum. In other words, risk comes in varying shades of grey. And the Chinese stock market, because it operates in an opaque and arbitrary environment, is greyer than most (but not entirely black). Live to understand definitions my friend.

    • @Zatanley
      @Zatanley 2 роки тому

      A delaying tactics and time waster. Lol. Even a fool can see that. Let Trump deal with that and not Biden..a bad video in my opinion not worth the tape it is recorded on.

  • @seubsangp2241
    @seubsangp2241 2 роки тому +8

    Imagine being invested in tutoring business stocks when the Chinese authorities shut them down overnight. That alone should make you think twice about investing in Chinese stocks when you have access to many more transparent makets.

  • @calvincoolidge6627
    @calvincoolidge6627 2 роки тому +42

    An audit requires testing of management’s statements. I don’t see how getting audit papers from state run Chinese auditing partnerships in China will increase the testability of Chinese companies financial statements. Sounds like PR.

    • @Cheeseatingjunglista
      @Cheeseatingjunglista 2 роки тому

      Exactly, it doesnt, essentially its just a big freestanding carboard cut out of Xi, with large speech bubble, "Trust me" it reads

    • @tetleydidley
      @tetleydidley 2 роки тому +6

      Not at all. Regulators looking at audit working papers would allow them to determine if the requirements set out in the International Standard on Auditing have been followed by the auditors themselves. The client says they have a million dollars. The auditor verifies that the million dollars really do exist at the moment the client says they exist and then document their work in the AWP. Finally the regulators verify that the auditors have indeed found enough and good quality evidence to support that assertion. Some auditors get lazy and skip the part where you have to keep the client's bank statements on file before confirming a client's assertion.

    • @metrolights9112
      @metrolights9112 2 роки тому

      @Lawofimprobability It's not about investigating China, it's about equal sharing of information for all companies. The Swiss if anything is a lot more secretive. Whereas a couple hackers were able to get access to 1 Billion records from Shanghai police dept, China is not that secretive.

  • @theIdlecrane
    @theIdlecrane 2 роки тому +13

    "China Agreed", they don't deliver though, just consistently unreliable.

    • @davianoinglesias5030
      @davianoinglesias5030 2 роки тому

      😅😅considering they the worlds factory your statement doesn't make sense

  • @Monsterpala
    @Monsterpala 2 роки тому +4

    I don't hold chinese papers and at least EY known to be toothless if not criminal. But if a audit that does its job and gets the real books I would sell everything before their report comes out. Seeing the real world images of millions of book wealth of chinese real estate gives me a good idea how chinese business makes its fantastic numbers.

  • @rkirby7183
    @rkirby7183 2 роки тому +2

    I don't see how a real audit can be conducted without being able to go on-site to check inventories and other items on the financial statements. Just looking at the papers in Hong Kong is no different that if they just scanned and emailed the documents anywhere in the world. There has to be real-world verification, including looking at plant and equipment and spot-checking warehouses (for example). Otherwise you're just believing the statements at the outset, the opposite of auditing.

  • @cloudyblaze7916
    @cloudyblaze7916 2 роки тому +137

    With inflation running at a four-decade high, a Recession is now the ‘most likely outcome for the economy. How can I grow my portfolio to outpace inflation and maintain a successful long-term strategy? I have been reading of investors making about $250k profit in this current crashing market, and I need ideas on how to achieve similar profits.

    • @albacus2400BC
      @albacus2400BC 2 роки тому +4

      There are a lot of strategies to make tongue-wetting profit especially in this down market, but such sophisticated trades can only be carried out by proper market experts...

    • @legacymedia8468
      @legacymedia8468 2 роки тому +2

      @@albacus2400BC True, the idea of a portfolio-coach used to sound generic, but a new study by investopedia actually found that demand for portfolio-coaches sky-rocketed by over 41.8% since the pandemic and based on firsthand encounters, I can say for certain their skillsets are topnotch, I've raised over $700k from an initially stagnant reserve of $150K all within 14months.

    • @legacymedia8468
      @legacymedia8468 2 роки тому +1

      @@stevensmiddlemass2072 My adviser is “THEDA HELENE JACKSON” You can easily look her up. She has years of financial market experience and she is also FINRA & SEC verifiable.

  • @polecabo
    @polecabo 2 роки тому +3

    That's why my Didi ride never came. I clicked the app and picked the nearest Luckin coffee place. I thought it was because I didn't remember my alipay password

  • @kleetus88
    @kleetus88 2 роки тому +10

    I really can't see the difference between Chinese companies that are "state-run" and non state-run. The CCP has their hooks in all firms of any significance. We have to treat all listed companies the same.

    • @johnwright9372
      @johnwright9372 2 роки тому

      A fundamental tenet of the Chinese mindset is resentment and suspicious of everything foreign. The CCP is not a communist party. It is an authoritarian, nationalist state.

  • @EZAZPI
    @EZAZPI 2 роки тому +4

    Are they agreeing to future audits just to stop the bleeding today? Kicking the can down the road to offer any bit of stability they can cling to.

    • @samsonsoturian6013
      @samsonsoturian6013 2 роки тому +1

      They did that last time, I don't know about this time

  • @ahhu.
    @ahhu. 2 роки тому +3

    "...and I was human"..!

  • @yorgosprotogeros3541
    @yorgosprotogeros3541 2 роки тому +7

    You should do a video about the fake gurus. Most of them are hiding now 😅

  • @HugeCann0n
    @HugeCann0n 2 роки тому +10

    Great video with detailed contents! I would say Patrick has a better and clearer understanding about the deal than many Chinese nationals. Btw, does anyone have the link to the report from Goldman Sachs regarding the 50% chance of delisting? I am not looking for the news article but the link to the actual report in pdf format. Would be great if PB could attached the link below the video, greatly appreciate it.

  • @johnpatrick1588
    @johnpatrick1588 2 роки тому +6

    First, we have to trust the auditors. Plenty of reasons why that may not be possible.

    • @1MinuteFlipDoc
      @1MinuteFlipDoc 2 роки тому

      The auditors want to be future wall street bankers, so not much is going to change. hahah

    • @samsonsoturian6013
      @samsonsoturian6013 Рік тому

      This America. The auditors have auditors.

  • @dl6860
    @dl6860 2 роки тому +54

    Thank you Patrick! Great analysis as always. Your words invariable advocate for continuous improvement in transparency, scrutiny, and building reasonable mechanisms for assessment.

    • @metrolights9112
      @metrolights9112 2 роки тому

      The point about being bi-partisan doesn't make it objective. Trump started a new red scare in America, and Biden, and Pelosi have unwittingly fallen into the White Nationalist's agenda.

  • @alphafox400
    @alphafox400 2 роки тому +60

    If U.S. investors and regulators fall for this one it will be another Charlie Brown trying to kick a football held by Lucy moment. I agree with Kyle Bass that investment managers who place client funds in Chinese instruments need to be held accountable for breach of fiduciary duty if not out right fraud. Are you listening Ray Dalio? As a retired lawyer I cannot help consider returning to the profession. I can smell the sweet oder of treble punitive damages.

    • @alesh2275
      @alesh2275 2 роки тому +4

      Sue these villains!

    • @dhirajmeenavilli5508
      @dhirajmeenavilli5508 2 роки тому +9

      Well I'm not an ex-lawyer so maybe it really is a breach of fiduciary duty, but I think if a fund manager genuinely believes that Chinese equities is the place to get the best deals for their clients wouldn't that trigger their fiduciary duty to invest there given they adhere to the risk management and portfolio construction norms of the industry accounting for the possibility of their Chinese positions to go to 0. Like I just think it can't be a breach of fiduciary duty to buy speculative assets as a manager because if so derrivatives, crypto, and pretty much any non traditional non developed market asset with strong binary outcomes such as biotech would probably breach fiduciary duty. I don't know obviously if those are false equvilances I'm drawing but that's my opinion. Also weren't there managers who money in Russian stocks? In your opinion should they be sued by their investors for a breach of fiduciary duty?

    • @polecabo
      @polecabo 2 роки тому +4

      As long as the explain to the clients that they aren't really buying that company with a big name and just a shell company in an island that is worth really nothing, then there's no breach

    • @MysteryKmt
      @MysteryKmt 2 роки тому +6

      @@dhirajmeenavilli5508 people have opinions like farts. Rise above the narrative. You are asking all the right questions with clear common sense answers. We're staring at a very likely once in lifetime deal, or an epic rug pull that would cost china, a culture all about saving face and respect, all credibility just as they're getting started. This reset thing is happening

    • @polecabo
      @polecabo 2 роки тому

      @Lawofimprobability that's lawyer language :)

  • @goon5544
    @goon5544 2 роки тому +7

    I'm avoiding China stocks all together. Why bother when you can buy US stocks.

    • @TBasianeyes
      @TBasianeyes 2 роки тому +1

      US consumer market is saturated but the Chinese market is not. Getting a cut of a growing market sounds like a good idea.

    • @samsonsoturian6013
      @samsonsoturian6013 2 роки тому

      US companies are globally diversified

    • @sko1beer
      @sko1beer 2 роки тому

      @@TBasianeyes not everyone is looking for low PE and high growth shares.
      Maybe he just like to hold stuff like Tesla

    • @goon5544
      @goon5544 2 роки тому +1

      @@sko1beer They dont want other countries profiting. China sees their businesses as an extension of the government. It adds a ton of risk i dont want, on top of questionable business practices being the norm. No thanks.

  • @stuartegrin7543
    @stuartegrin7543 2 роки тому +2

    So unless I’m mistaken people on the inside create regulations then they go work on the outside as a hired gun to represent entities so they can get around the rules they put in place Sounds like a racket to me

  • @jarnMod
    @jarnMod 2 роки тому +4

    They spend a year+ to work on financial labyrinth so they can lie to investor just a while longer. They need money now as their own liquidity market were forced to focus on real estate, so foreign investment is critical and they will do anything to get/keep them.

  • @TheBupsta
    @TheBupsta 2 роки тому +3

    Crazy that they allowed state run corporations list without audits

  • @johnwright9372
    @johnwright9372 2 роки тому +2

    There are two main reasons China would not agree to audits of Chinese public companies in foreign markets :
    1. To hide continued fraudulent accounting
    2. To maintain state control of Chinese boards.

    • @samsonsoturian6013
      @samsonsoturian6013 Рік тому

      There's also the laziness principal. US consumer protection is strict and there's a lot of paperwork and fact checking. Many foreign banks won't even do business in America for this reason, which is why traveler's checks exist.

  • @ServoSambo
    @ServoSambo 2 роки тому +29

    Thanks Patrick. My 2 cent? Chinese stocks and bonds remain un-investable regardless of where they’re listed. They’re speculative only at this point in history.

    • @sprague49
      @sprague49 2 роки тому

      Even the Chinese won't invest in Chinese stocks. That's why 70% of mainlander's wealth is tied up in real estate.

    • @dhirajmeenavilli5508
      @dhirajmeenavilli5508 2 роки тому

      The term univestable is interesting though don't you think? Like it by defenition connotes low prices. That is like the place where alpha lives. Take for example the often cited, "Death of Equaties", best time to buy equaties or after the depression when you could pick things up for 3x earnings that were growing cash generation capacity, and taking market share. That's my 2 cents however

    • @hypothalapotamus5293
      @hypothalapotamus5293 2 роки тому

      2 cent or tencent(TCEHY)? 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

    • @ServoSambo
      @ServoSambo 2 роки тому

      @@hypothalapotamus5293 you were the only one who got it i think…😀

  • @shakeypudding6563
    @shakeypudding6563 2 роки тому +15

    Smoke and mirrors. Sadly, I don’t think anything close to an audit of Chinese company will ever happen.

  • @raideurng2508
    @raideurng2508 2 роки тому +1

    Anyone who says transparency is not acceptable is not something you want to trust or invest in.

    • @samsonsoturian6013
      @samsonsoturian6013 Рік тому

      Not always. Sometimes there's nukes involved.
      But yeah, don't invest with someone who can't tell you what they do with your money.

  • @nikiriy
    @nikiriy 2 роки тому +1

    Props for refusing to jump on the meta thought enforcement train 👍

  • @ronnieeubanks6559
    @ronnieeubanks6559 2 роки тому +2

    How much you wanna bet their records will be putting Madoff's financial records to shame.

  • @alexleung842
    @alexleung842 2 роки тому +2

    China should be open to their companies raising capital abroad. This is basically bringing loads of foreign money to help build up China.

    • @CHR1SZ7
      @CHR1SZ7 2 роки тому +2

      They would rather keep their secrecy at any cost, and rely on whatever money they can get from risk-tolerant investors who are prepared to funnel money into companies whose performance can’t be measured

  • @MysteryKmt
    @MysteryKmt 2 роки тому +2

    As we start QT theyll begin QE. Seems like an orchestra don't it? ☯️

  • @davidt3296
    @davidt3296 2 роки тому +2

    Exactly why I sold Bio, and baba

  • @k98killer
    @k98killer 2 роки тому +1

    Zuckerborg saying "I was human" is pretty great.

  • @merlingeikie
    @merlingeikie Рік тому +1

    All Chinese 'audit' work needs a lot of creativity and imagination.
    Communists need the West, the West does not need communism.

  • @lidiasantoro3098
    @lidiasantoro3098 2 роки тому +1

    Audited and checked by?
    Who can trust the numbers?🎉

  • @swchang8660
    @swchang8660 2 роки тому +2

    Most of them hv 2 sets of accounts. Retail investors were burned so badly when all these s-chips were listed on the stk exch of Singapore. When investigated suddenly there is fire in the office, someone stole whatever in the office,just too many excuses.

  • @stuartegrin7543
    @stuartegrin7543 2 роки тому +1

    So where did all the money from the DD rideshare IPO and up? Perhaps in the coffers of the CCP? Upon further analysis it looks like it was a scam

  • @TheMrFishnDucks
    @TheMrFishnDucks 2 роки тому +3

    Very nice and informative video. Looking forward to the long term consequences of this. Keep up the good work.

  • @BestDividendStocks
    @BestDividendStocks 2 роки тому +2

    Cool video 💥🔥💰

  • @markepping1410
    @markepping1410 2 роки тому +1

    Need to stop dancing with these guys and delist them. Enough is enough! We look like the idiots and butt kissers we are!!

  • @stareagle5000
    @stareagle5000 2 роки тому +4

    What happens to us shareholders of these companies when the company is delisted?

  • @iamBANGMARTIN
    @iamBANGMARTIN 2 роки тому +5

    You have a great program here!

  • @eroskaw5423
    @eroskaw5423 2 роки тому +1

    these big 4 auditors have chinese employees who were trained by the ccp to be cadres

  • @DecemberNames
    @DecemberNames 2 роки тому +1

    Thank you for another great video

  • @Kowalex
    @Kowalex 2 роки тому +8

    Hi Patrick. Great job, Great content

    • @Kowalex
      @Kowalex 2 роки тому

      Hi Patrick, why do you want me to WhatsApp you???

  • @ashishpatel350
    @ashishpatel350 2 роки тому +2

    beijing biden wont let that happen.

  • @peterbenko9395
    @peterbenko9395 2 роки тому +24

    Great work ... as a banker or better "Risk-Manager" for 15 years: love Your videos!!!

  • @tinolino58
    @tinolino58 2 роки тому +1

    Only fools believe the chineese will honor the contract.

  • @AphelionImprint
    @AphelionImprint 2 роки тому

    Great video thank you :)

  • @stewlfcplayer13
    @stewlfcplayer13 2 роки тому

    Hey Patrick great video! Are you able to provide a couple sources regarding the previous deal reached back in 2014 that you mentioned in your video? Thanks

  • @superperformance
    @superperformance 2 роки тому +1

    BTW, the short clip tells us that Mark Zuckerberg is no longer human

  • @ruanof7
    @ruanof7 2 роки тому +5

    If you trust them on China not cooking the books and if you lose American $ then you deserve it ! don't we have good enough American companies to invest on? ???????????

  • @DONGXiiTheChinaOpportunity
    @DONGXiiTheChinaOpportunity 2 роки тому

    VIE structures are a non-issue to me. They are a legal construct like any other, to allow to be compliant with legislation. If you don't trust VIE, also don't trust in marriage or other contracts, simple as that.

  • @VernaSelander
    @VernaSelander 2 роки тому +1

    I feel smarter after every single video presentation! Thank you Patrick 👌

  • @marcgerges1380
    @marcgerges1380 2 роки тому +2

    Hey Patrick great work, thank you!

  • @okunrin3
    @okunrin3 2 роки тому

    So if a British business is controlled by the Uk 🇬🇧 government, we won’t be allowed in the US? I thought we were partners!