@@markae0 Universal Basic Income - it's inevitable, actually, as automation is taking away more and more low-skilled jobs, and already even some higher skilled ones. If we reach a point where automation is capable of supplying everyone's physical needs, there will no longer be any need for people to work to pay for things. At that point, the main challenge in life will be to look for and engage in activities that inspire us.
@@davidjorgensen877 some comedy . Agent Smith "Did you know that the first Matrix was designed to be a perfect human world? Where none suffered, where everyone would be happy. It was a disaster. No one would accept the program. Entire crops were lost
@@davidjorgensen877 As nice of the idea of universal basic income is, it wont work with how large our current population is. If such a society like you are describing would exist then a significant amount of the human population would die out due to poverty/starvation before it would ever happen. Not an ideal situation.
@@pegasusactua2985 I didn't say it was coming in our lifetime. But look at the advance of automation - jobs are disappearing at an exponential rate. The biggest obstacle to UBI is the accumulation of wealth at the top 1%, which is also growing exponentially - the average CEO in 2023 made 246 times the average worker they employed - insane! The people who most need the available resources in the world are denied them because unfettered capitalism is accumulating virtually all the wealth in the hands of those who have more than they can ever use. How does it make any sense on a societal level to legally permit that ridiculous imbalance to continue? If those same resources were distributed equitably amongst the entire population, there would be no starvation in the world today - fact! We already have the resources needed to feed the world and eliminate unnecessary suffering. The only thing preventing it is human greed ... and society's willingness to accept the status quo by continuing to vote for representatives who support it. Gene Roddenberry had this all figured out in the 60s, and he wasn't wrong. Only time will tell if his very correct vision for the future can actually be realized. If not, we're probably just doomed.
Ubiquitous 32-inch flat-screens, computerized diets, frozen meals, microwave prep. I mean, that's not a bad score for guessing 40-years down the road (though it's even closer in 2024 than in 2000).
Ah, the year 2000, I remember it fondly. The tiny people that lived in my appliances went on strike in June, but I offered to keep the cat out of the kitchen, and they were back to work within a few hours.
I like the assumption that people in the future would love having bulky machines with conveyor belts in their kitchens as if turning our house interior into a food factory is the cool way of living.
Its why I get a laugh when I hear people tell me that in just 20 years we will have advanced robots that will look real. Like buddy, if you go back 100 years ago they thought that by now we'd have robots, everyone would be driving flying cars and that we'd have apartments on the moon. We don't have any of that, yet you believe in 20 years we'll have the realistic robots???
I like that the person who captioned this thought 190 came after 120.
It sounds like he’s just counting down from 120, or two minutes in seconds, saying “one-twenty, one-nineteen…”.
Funny enough, it was technology that got that number wrong. 😆
That kind of counting error never would have happened in the year 2000.
Technically, 190 does come after 120. (Just trolling. I know what you meant.)
If you want a vision of the future, imagine eating microwaved frozen food every day, forever
Learn to cook, its cheaper.
I see what you did there
Factor meals
Or meals delivered and reheated in a programmable toaster oven. That's a new level of pathetic.
All the cooking is automated but Mommy still does it all
That's because she doesn't have a job.
@@GDuncan8002☕️
Yeah, that was a bit of an issue in 2000, but women gained the right to vote 2001, so it all kind of evened out.
Damn.... seeing this be so futuristic, it almost feels like in 2024, we have actually gone back in time.
so much regression :(
"...a society rich in leisure..."
Yeah, right. 😂
how you make money in a world rich in leisure?
@@markae0 Universal Basic Income - it's inevitable, actually, as automation is taking away more and more low-skilled jobs, and already even some higher skilled ones. If we reach a point where automation is capable of supplying everyone's physical needs, there will no longer be any need for people to work to pay for things. At that point, the main challenge in life will be to look for and engage in activities that inspire us.
@@davidjorgensen877 some comedy . Agent Smith "Did you know that the first Matrix was designed to be a perfect human world? Where none suffered, where everyone would be happy. It was a disaster. No one would accept the program. Entire crops were lost
@@davidjorgensen877
As nice of the idea of universal basic income is, it wont work with how large our current population is. If such a society like you are describing would exist then a significant amount of the human population would die out due to poverty/starvation before it would ever happen. Not an ideal situation.
@@pegasusactua2985 I didn't say it was coming in our lifetime. But look at the advance of automation - jobs are disappearing at an exponential rate. The biggest obstacle to UBI is the accumulation of wealth at the top 1%, which is also growing exponentially - the average CEO in 2023 made 246 times the average worker they employed - insane! The people who most need the available resources in the world are denied them because unfettered capitalism is accumulating virtually all the wealth in the hands of those who have more than they can ever use. How does it make any sense on a societal level to legally permit that ridiculous imbalance to continue? If those same resources were distributed equitably amongst the entire population, there would be no starvation in the world today - fact! We already have the resources needed to feed the world and eliminate unnecessary suffering. The only thing preventing it is human greed ... and society's willingness to accept the status quo by continuing to vote for representatives who support it. Gene Roddenberry had this all figured out in the 60s, and he wasn't wrong. Only time will tell if his very correct vision for the future can actually be realized. If not, we're probably just doomed.
Ubiquitous 32-inch flat-screens, computerized diets, frozen meals, microwave prep. I mean, that's not a bad score for guessing 40-years down the road (though it's even closer in 2024 than in 2000).
- Screens = Video calls
- Digital menu = WhatsApp or some app for write things
- Food appearing from some place = Food delivery
if you have extra money food will come from delivery otherwise you will cook your own
They detected AI, The Computer will decide what you should eat.
Ah, the year 2000, I remember it fondly. The tiny people that lived in my appliances went on strike in June, but I offered to keep the cat out of the kitchen, and they were back to work within a few hours.
I like the assumption that people in the future would love having bulky machines with conveyor belts in their kitchens as if turning our house interior into a food factory is the cool way of living.
It's not cheeseburgers! It's people!!!!!
I've been hearing and seeing that futuristic instant food crap (not frozen foods) for fifty years. Even as a kid it never made sense.
If everything is stored frozen and warmed by microwave, whats will all the pots and pans at the end?!
they will go to a dishwasher
. . . pretty close!
Chocolate pudding, it comes in a cup. It's only a buck. From Molly's kitchen, it's a labor of love.
Mary Tyler Moore will serve you something that could be considered food.
Eat the bug cubes with your family of 3 house hold
pretty much....then again, who can afford a house today?
Was this video made before or after Soylent Green?
Before. Soylent Green came out in 1973.
So, pretty much the house from There Will Come Gentle Rains?
Fully automated kitchen and husband still can't feed himself 😂
real life jetsons
Lol. Disposable dishes. How could you?
Baaaased
And in the future, the woman's place is still in the home
Its why I get a laugh when I hear people tell me that in just 20 years we will have advanced robots that will look real. Like buddy, if you go back 100 years ago they thought that by now we'd have robots, everyone would be driving flying cars and that we'd have apartments on the moon. We don't have any of that, yet you believe in 20 years we'll have the realistic robots???
We totally have the technology for this 🤔
"daily menus on the nutritional needs"
well, that didn''t happen. :)
No. The computer will bog down, because Microsoft & Apple want you to buy a new PC every two years. 😅
Techno lunacy is just like religious lunacy. Just as laughable as predicting the end times.
They didn't factor in that instant food would be necessary in the year 2023 because women aren't traditional anymore and don't want to cook.
Don't worry, the trad wife movement will have that all worked out by 2040. :)