Potential ways to detect an ether wind | Special relativity | Physics | Khan Academy

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 15 гру 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 188

  • @keithmcgarrigle2653
    @keithmcgarrigle2653 2 роки тому +6

    I would like to see the Michensen Morley experiment with the apparatus use in the vertical rotation instead of the horizontal. I think if they find a phase shift the result might point towards that the atmospheric electrical field is use by light to propagate. ( light creating waves in the electrial field being the medium / aether). This electrical field is produced in the same way a capacitor or liden jar stores energy (in the dielectric). This electrical field is produced either in our atmosphere by the potential difference between +ve Ions in the ionosphere, and the -ve earth's potential , or by the potential difference between objects being suns planets moons galaxies excetra in space a vacuum (dielectric). This could be vacuum energy.

  • @BRJWON
    @BRJWON 5 років тому +2

    In the illustration of ether wind, There is no moving stream of the ether rather we ( the island) are moving. So, if a pebble is dropped in the water it should still have same waves in all directions. I don’t get the point of light speed being different if we are moving through ether.

  • @gritlup2089
    @gritlup2089 5 років тому +6

    A wave of WHAT?

  • @r2com641
    @r2com641 5 років тому +3

    Fundamental question... why either needs to have direction? Why it needs to be as a wind? What if it’s just medium without any direction?

    • @millej38
      @millej38 4 роки тому

      If there's no wind, but you ride a bike, it feels as though wind is hitting your face.

    • @salvatore.M77
      @salvatore.M77 Рік тому

      The æther, 5th subtle element of creation is finer than air and cannot be compared to it, it is totally different

  • @wesbaumguardner8829
    @wesbaumguardner8829 5 років тому +3

    You have it backwards. The earth moves because of the ether. If there is any movement of the earth relative to the ether, it is due to lag or hysteresis.

  • @gritlup2089
    @gritlup2089 5 років тому +4

    Check out Theoria Apophasis on UA-cam. That guy with discuss and explain the simplicity of Nature and the Universe so clearly your head with rip itself off your shoulder's and roll down the hall.

  • @-o-light8863
    @-o-light8863 3 роки тому

    We are moving in accordance to the ether

  • @LucTemetNosce
    @LucTemetNosce 5 років тому +7

    If the ether is like a substance through which light travels, you should consider that it is also moving *with* the galaxy, like water in a whirlwind. The same force that moves us moves the ether, so in that case it wouldn't move in an opposite direction. I think that could also explain the bending of the light, similar to the refraction effect of light in the water.

    • @starshiptrooper9979
      @starshiptrooper9979 3 роки тому

      THE AINCIENTS HARVESTED ETHER FROM THE ATHMOSHERE, THE OLD CATHEDRALS WE SEE EVERYWHERE WERE POWER PLANTS THAT HARVESTED ETHER. SEE MORE INFO ON VIDEO LHFE ON TELEGRAM CHANNEL @EWARANON

    • @TheCBC1984
      @TheCBC1984 3 роки тому

      etherists don't believe that light travels, rather the impotence of energy causes movement in the medium.

    • @WorksopGimp
      @WorksopGimp 2 роки тому

      @@starshiptrooper9979 And what did the they use the collected ether for, running ancet TV screens,washing machine,drills

    • @WorksopGimp
      @WorksopGimp 2 роки тому

      @@TheCBC1984 What is the light travelling trough? Sound needs air to travel through or you hear nothing Did you watch the video he did cover this

    • @eu29lex16
      @eu29lex16 2 роки тому

      @@TheCBC1984 Lol, what ? Well, that's actually not half-bad.

  • @TheCBC1984
    @TheCBC1984 3 роки тому +2

    what if the ether's natural state is stationary? or if the ether on earth is traveling with the earth?

  • @aeroscience9834
    @aeroscience9834 9 років тому +6

    Can't wait for relativity!

  • @TriPham-xd9wk
    @TriPham-xd9wk 3 роки тому

    This is the Holy grail of physics

  • @Theorica
    @Theorica 5 років тому +1

    Light has no speed. It has a rate of induction. Everything is based on capacitance and resistance or more precisely magnetic permeability and dielectric permittivity, and acceleration and inertia. Once we understand this, things like knowing why light's rate of induction or "speed" changes when travelling through a medium of glass and returns to its previous rate after leaving that medium then become trivial.

  • @stephen7774
    @stephen7774 2 роки тому +1

    Gravity is ether wind which pushes you down in the direction of the centre of the Earth. The Michelson and Morley experiment only tried to measure the ether in a horizontal plane. Now, if they inverted the interferometer to a vertical position they would have been more successful.

    • @keithmcgarrigle2653
      @keithmcgarrigle2653 2 роки тому

      I have added my thoughts which are in line with yours. I have read your comments after l sent mine.

  • @RushinVr6
    @RushinVr6 9 років тому

    So awesome to see people start to address the #EtherShield

  • @gumgumbegum
    @gumgumbegum 9 років тому +5

    this guy makes me like science. I'm doing master's degree in mechanical engineering and i'd rather watch him talk about all the random topics that are relatively useless for my education.

  • @rayrivera1830
    @rayrivera1830 9 років тому +5

    interesting stuff. I would think if you don't know what the ether actually is, you can't really assume it would affect the speed of light. Ether should be revisited with the strenght of modern quantum mechanics, with particles coming thru dimentions.

    • @AngraMainiiu
      @AngraMainiiu 9 років тому +2

      Well its not just quantum mechanics because the instruments we used to measure Ether were crap to say the least. The problem is if Ether were confirmed, it would force scientists to throw away almost everything we have learned these past 100 Years and reexamine the universe and our reality.

    • @AngraMainiiu
      @AngraMainiiu 9 років тому

      Joshua Bruton
      Everyone agrees that light's speed is constant but Ether has nothing to do with that.
      Take light slowing down in water for example, it's not because light's speed is slowing down, it's just that there is so much in the way of light that it gets delayed.
      So the problem with the Michelson-Morley experiment was that it was too tiny, it needed to be upscaled to a few hundred meters with more precise instruments.

    • @Ataensic
      @Ataensic 8 років тому +3

      There is no speed of light.
      What we call light is energy moving through the Ether medium. We're measuring the rate of induction (of energy through the medium), not the speed of a microscopic particle in a vacuum.
      I can assure you nothing is being shot out of your light bulbs & everyone knows that the rate of induction can be slowed by passing the energy waves through a prism/capacitor.

    • @Ataensic
      @Ataensic 8 років тому +2

      Light is dielectric-electromagnetic. How do you think energy is traveling from one point to another? What do you think electromagnetism is? What do you think 400 nm to 800 nm is a measure of? (ripples of Ether)

    • @AngraMainiiu
      @AngraMainiiu 8 років тому

      Ataensic
      To be fair light does have a speed much in the same way sound does. In fact I would compare it to the doppler effect in which the speed of sound isnt changed but rather the frequency of the sound is. However in Light's case an object's speed plays no factor if an object redshifts or blueshifts.
      Joshua Bruton Its not that Ether hasnt been proven per-se but rather it hasnt been explained. Light is literally the only thing we allow to lack any form of medium. Listen, there are all forms of waves be it Radiowaves, Microwaves, Infrared waves and then light rays... why is this? Sure we may not know exactly what propagates electromagnetic waves, but to utterly dismiss it? That is insane!

  • @matthewyoungsoonam
    @matthewyoungsoonam 9 років тому +34

    Does he have a Ph.D. In everything?

    • @shay9732
      @shay9732 9 років тому

      Masters in science i think

    • @bryannguyen8440
      @bryannguyen8440 9 років тому +3

      +Matthew Nam He has a Bachelor of Science degrees in mathematics, electrical engineering, and computer science in 1998, later getting his Master of Science in electrical engineering and computer science.Khan also holds a Master of Business Administration from Harvard Business School. -Forbes

    • @GottfriedLeibnizYT
      @GottfriedLeibnizYT 9 років тому +3

      +Matthew Nam ironically, he actually has a masters in electrical engineering and never made a video about it. he makes videos about things he's not specialized in like biology, history,....etc which takes lots of effort to research it.

    • @killersalmon4359
      @killersalmon4359 7 років тому +1

      It may be because he likes learning new stuff - plus, if he has a masters in electrical engineering, he may so sick of it, he breaks out in hives even thinking of it.

    • @WeissXO
      @WeissXO 6 років тому

      @@GottfriedLeibnizYT I hope you realize he is literally a part of the SAT people... His videos arent just made by him theyre part of the standardized education in the entire country, the SAT people make these videos and hes the narrator of them

  • @nadayabiznas3618
    @nadayabiznas3618 7 років тому +1

    it's like measuring the flow of a river by only measuring across it from bank to bank.

  • @suumcuique2271
    @suumcuique2271 11 днів тому

    The etheric wind is easy to detect by the change in the weight of the weight of a precision scale (in the middle latitudes of the Northern Hemisphere). The ebb and flow of the tides are the result of the influence of the etheric wind.

  • @The_North_Meng
    @The_North_Meng 3 роки тому +1

    the earhis a giant magnet and creates a bubble in the ether, this could account for the lack of the wind on the planet.maybe they can try the experiment again away from the magnetic field of the planets and sun.

  • @Chefmaddix
    @Chefmaddix 9 років тому

    ahh i couldnt find the next video. just realized it was put up today. cant wait for the next

  • @QuantumPeter
    @QuantumPeter 4 роки тому +1

    I think what they imagined as eather is spacetime continuoum itself.And "eather wind" is practicaly gravitational waves which were actually discovered by the LIGO experiment. The two experiments are very very similar.
    I mean come on.What is spacetime? Has anyone observed it? Why did we take it for granded in Einstein's Theory?
    I think LIGO observed gravitational waves which prove that there is actualy spacetime!

    • @thetheoreticalphysicist2407
      @thetheoreticalphysicist2407 3 роки тому +1

      Right.. I have also been thinking the same.. I think space-time fabric, gravitational constant, ether, and dark energy are all the same...

  • @Shimulnath96
    @Shimulnath96 5 років тому

    Thank you

  • @anthonyowen6204
    @anthonyowen6204 11 місяців тому

    How long was the experiment run for or did they do it multiple time's ?

  • @beyzasila1033
    @beyzasila1033 9 років тому

    thank you so much

  • @мир-н3л4х
    @мир-н3л4х Рік тому +1

    Hello everyone!!! is the sun moving around the center of the galaxy?????

  • @atheistaetherist2747
    @atheistaetherist2747 3 роки тому

    No MMX has ever been null, the aether never died, & Michelson believed in the aether for ever. Google Demjanov's twin media (air & carbondisulphide) MMX done in Obninsk on 22 June 1970 which showed an aetherwind of 140 km/s min & 480 km/s max during a day (this was the horizontal projection of the background aetherwind which is approx 500 km/s south to north blowing approx 20 deg off Earth's spin-axis). This genius 1st order MMX was 1000 times as sensitive & accurate as the oldendays 2nd order MMXs.

  • @TriPham-xd9wk
    @TriPham-xd9wk 3 роки тому

    So without ether or of ether change light speed must change or time must change

  • @nu.wa.n
    @nu.wa.n 9 років тому

    Khan should get the Nobel peace prize

  • @titaniumdiveknife
    @titaniumdiveknife 3 роки тому

    Nice.

  • @cyndimouse827
    @cyndimouse827 9 років тому +1

    Very interesting I wish I was as interested in math the I'd have a better race probably

    • @DivergentDroid
      @DivergentDroid 5 років тому

      No need to be good in math. Just pop out as many babies as possible in your lifetime and teach them well.

  • @tobysource
    @tobysource Рік тому

    What are your thoughts on Ruyong Wang's 2004 experiment, which linearized the Sagnac effect? What do you think linearization means for the Michelson-Morley experiment?

  • @jrc734
    @jrc734 5 років тому +2

    What if the ether is stationary?

    • @PlasmaSnake369
      @PlasmaSnake369 5 років тому +1

      That's basically the premise, that we are supposed to be moving relative to the ether.

  • @tucsonguy62
    @tucsonguy62 7 років тому +6

    Be careful. The jump to an assumption that the ether has space like qualities may not be true. So his whole talk may be wrong.

    • @jesusdiazzz6369
      @jesusdiazzz6369 6 років тому

      just watch a video about ether. ua-cam.com/video/Hzr0-uboVRQ/v-deo.html - even nikola tesla believed in this

    • @MythosMachine369
      @MythosMachine369 5 років тому +1

      didn't Michelson Morley experiment conclude the earth is stationary?

    • @noneofyourbusiness5451
      @noneofyourbusiness5451 5 років тому

      ether IS space

    • @noneofyourbusiness5451
      @noneofyourbusiness5451 5 років тому

      @@MythosMachine369 The Michelson Morley experiment really only detected no differential between the hypothetical ether and the earth. The experiment is predicated on the assumption the earth moves through the ether and not with it.

    • @noneofyourbusiness5451
      @noneofyourbusiness5451 5 років тому

      The haefele-keating experiment may have proven the ether does exist.
      the prominent result of tat experiment is that the experiment caused a clock to slow down.
      There is an assumption made that the clock slowed down because time slowed down
      In fact the only observable result is that the clock ran slower
      I don't think any investigation was made in that experiment into other reasons the clock slowed down
      inertia and mass are interchangeable
      a moving clock would have more mass relative to a stationary clock
      if the mass of the clock increased without a corresponding increase in the energy driving the clock of course the clock would slow down.
      it doesn't matter what kind of clock was used mechanical or atomic.
      the clock still has mass
      mass and gravity are qualities of space just as magnetism is a quality of space itself and not a quality of a magnet
      magnetic materials experience a force of magnetism by space and also create magnetic fields in space
      remove the magnet and the field remains fixed in space. The field is a quality of space itself and not the magnet
      a moving clock would experience more contact with the ether than a stationary clock
      Hypothetically this is related to some relationship between mass and space that is not understood
      the relationship expresses in such a way that an increase in mass by an increase in inertia is only relative to gravity when the direction of movement is aligned with the alignment of gravity.
      in relation to other phenomenon and outside of an alignment with gravity inertial mass is interchangeable with mass measured by weight.
      This is evident in the theory why matter cannot be accelerated to the speed of light
      as you accelerate an object it's mass increases. this is inertia.
      the more the mass increases the greater the force required to accelerate it
      this is exponential it is not a linear equation.
      as you approach the speed of light the mass and the energy required to accelerate it approach infinite
      thus you can get closer and closer but never get there or go beyond
      that theory changed when E=MC^2 was discovered showing the conversion relationship between matter and energy

  • @cgdahlin
    @cgdahlin 4 роки тому +1

    For those wishing to look into this further, bypass the Michelson-Morley experiment and jump straight into Dayton Miller's suppressed research on the Ether wind. Really brings up alot of pervasive questions in regards to mainstream physics.

    • @alienwarex51i3
      @alienwarex51i3 2 роки тому

      @nehem Y'all publish papers on this subject or something?

    • @alienwarex51i3
      @alienwarex51i3 2 роки тому

      @nehem Wait, so what do you base your beliefs about the aether on? If you disregard papers, do you perform experiments yourself?

  • @ryansanders1333
    @ryansanders1333 9 років тому

    what program do you use

  • @daroniussubdeviant3869
    @daroniussubdeviant3869 Рік тому

    frame dragging in a fluid medium.

  • @youeladamas7840
    @youeladamas7840 6 років тому +1

    if the universe is full of aether and matter it might be galaxies are aether whirlpools so the matter and the aether move with each other matter being mostly empty and just force structural-ized aether bit/charges/lol1&-1

  • @judcitizen706
    @judcitizen706 8 років тому

    Hint: Just say "Ether." You don't have to stumble over "Luminiferous" every time. It's like always saying "www." Unnecessary.

  • @KaliFissure
    @KaliFissure 3 роки тому

    We can detect ether wind because space itself is the ether. Everything is made of curled up space. We don't move through an ether, we are the ether.

    • @eu29lex16
      @eu29lex16 2 роки тому

      That stupid nonesense, ether is not space, space is just nothing, it's not something, stop freakign saying space is something, it doesn't even exist like we do.

  • @ondrobaco
    @ondrobaco 5 років тому

    Ether wind idea would work unless the physical world itself is a form of disturbance of the ether.

  • @floppy-disko2378
    @floppy-disko2378 4 роки тому +2

    But you are assuming that this ether is static, what if it is accelerating from gravity like everything else?

    • @millej38
      @millej38 4 роки тому

      I think it is traveling at the same speed as light.

    • @eu29lex16
      @eu29lex16 2 роки тому

      The ether itself is static, but requires the attraction of matter for it to move to form gravity ! And the ether requires some source of energy to make light/photon waves.

    • @eu29lex16
      @eu29lex16 2 роки тому

      @@millej38 Ether "particles" are transmitting energy from one particle to another, in it's own huge field, at the speed of light.

  • @jovanreyes5953
    @jovanreyes5953 9 років тому

    I will like to know which program do you use to make your videos! I believe it is and excellent study tecnique

    • @leoramos9772
      @leoramos9772 4 роки тому

      it is UA-cam, is a new plataform
      Enjoy!

  • @TriPham-xd9wk
    @TriPham-xd9wk 3 роки тому

    I currently experiencing the failure of number theory or the counting is not working

  • @lien3729
    @lien3729 2 роки тому

    Michelson-Morley failed to detect luminiferous aether, LIGO successfully found it, now they call it "space-time"

  • @jondonnelly3
    @jondonnelly3 4 роки тому

    why does light, speed up after it has finished traversing though a medium. Where does the energy come from that speeds light back up to what it was before.

    • @The_North_Meng
      @The_North_Meng 3 роки тому

      smae reason why sound speeds up when it travels into a denser medium like the ground.

  • @TriPham-xd9wk
    @TriPham-xd9wk 3 роки тому

    Without or change of ether all consciousness change even human intelligent change too and ultimately all thing

  • @FEV369
    @FEV369 3 роки тому

    You can't test the ether because it's not just moving around you... It's like being in the ocean, you are in it's current. It's like being in a rushing river... you are in it's current... You don't stand still, like a poll in either, why would you in the ether?

  • @millej38
    @millej38 4 роки тому

    Can you slow or speed light? Perhaps the aether is traveling at the same speed as light. So due to relativity neither has an effect on the other.

    • @The_North_Meng
      @The_North_Meng 3 роки тому

      yes, light slows down through different mediums like glass and water. there is no speed of light, it depends on the medium

    • @eu29lex16
      @eu29lex16 2 роки тому

      Matter speeds down light cuz it has a big structure of particles ! While an "aether" field has FEWER particles in one UNIT of space, so light has an easier time trying to pass through that, which is why light has the speed it has, but it's also the aether "particles" which give light it's huge, but finite, speed.

  • @TriPham-xd9wk
    @TriPham-xd9wk 3 роки тому

    If faster we goes without sight

  • @space_mmx_now_please
    @space_mmx_now_please 2 роки тому

    What if Michelson-Morley was done with ether drag/entrained ether in mind?

  • @evanrutherfordlazyahole9079

    Ether wind is a cooler name.

  • @commonsense1103
    @commonsense1103 5 років тому +1

    Smart as owls with wide open eyes you are all but your eyes are closed and that makes you blind

  • @johnfoyer_alianna_el
    @johnfoyer_alianna_el 5 років тому

    Well then this luminosity creates a barrier field of resistance to our motion through space. So then nothing relatively is true and thus everything is permitted correct

  • @brianthompson2089
    @brianthompson2089 4 роки тому

    Main stream physics : the aether does not exist.
    Super secret Lockheed Skunkworks physics : the aether does exist!

  • @Ataensic
    @Ataensic 8 років тому +6

    You're misunderstanding the nature of Ether. Ether is counterspace. i.e. Not a field in space but the primer-field prior to disturbance (agitations which result in different effects that lead to measures of space over a period of time).
    Gravity is not an 'extra' force but is incoherent acceleration towards the Ether nexus. i.e. What we would call incohesive magnetic attraction. (falling towards lowest pressure area)
    A rubber ducky orbiting around the drain in the bathtub as the water flows down and around is moving due to the medium, not in spite of it.
    Essentially you've asked us to measure the movements of the cosmic bodies against the pressures that are responsible for moving them.
    Modern physics just renamed the Ether 'spacetime' or 'quantum fluid', but it's basically the same thing. We know the planets are 'connected' to the Sun (and rest of the galaxy). Modern physics postulates that enormous mass warps space, which of course means that space can't be an empty vacuum and must have properties that can be 'distorted'. (Ether)

    • @georgibaldjiev4469
      @georgibaldjiev4469 7 років тому +2

      You are right, but confidential science doesn't want to reveal the mistakes in some basic laws(such as Einstein's relativity). Many incredible scientists like Nikola Tesla have been nearly "deleted from the books" because of their "uncomfortable" discoveries.

    • @substantivalism6787
      @substantivalism6787 7 років тому +2

      георги балджиев Is that why nothing in this "true" physics (ether) hasn't made any discoveries since then. Except attract conspiracist theorists like you.

    • @georgibaldjiev4469
      @georgibaldjiev4469 7 років тому +1

      Justin Orosz I am not taking about conspiracy theories. I just say that many things in physics aren't perfectly defined. I am not trying disprove those things. I just mentioned some facts about today's science. In fact I hope someone will develop a theory that explains the missing parts in physics.

    • @WeissXO
      @WeissXO 6 років тому

      This isnt a singular person, hes part of the SAT, these are literally the people that standardize the countrys education

    • @siddharthnandi3995
      @siddharthnandi3995 3 роки тому

      If ether is the so called "true physics", then why have not made any discoveries or accomplishments since they were first debunked?
      Also, where do these claims about the nature of the Aether come from?

  • @nikhilsomvanshi9960
    @nikhilsomvanshi9960 4 роки тому

    Why does the ether has to be "flowing" like a "wind" ? Could this ether not be like water in a static pond ? I don't see why it needs to have a direction, like a wind has.

  • @jovanperic4214
    @jovanperic4214 4 роки тому +1

    This is based on the assumption that the "Eather Wind" is moving. What if this element is stationary in relationship to us or everything around us?

    • @need2know739
      @need2know739 4 роки тому

      Good point, I see the aether as a constant with the ability to be manipulated. Maybe its the source of Connectivity of Energy when applied to it. Action to opposite reaction concept.
      What potentially derives from it is merely equal to the amount of energy thats applied. If that make any sense?

    • @alienwarex51i3
      @alienwarex51i3 2 роки тому

      This is touched on at the beginning of the video. The odds of the "Ether" being stationary relative to everything around us is essentially 0.

  • @stephen7774
    @stephen7774 2 роки тому

    You have made the same mistake as Michelsen and Morley. You have assumed that the island is stationary relative to the ether. This is not the case. The Earth and all the planets are pushed by the ether wind. That's why they all travel at the same relative speed according to Kepler's 3rd law of planetary motion.

  • @CrudOMatic
    @CrudOMatic 9 років тому

    Revolving around the sun, not rotating...

  • @drevialzerathustra5336
    @drevialzerathustra5336 9 років тому

    quintessence,...

  • @CrudOMatic
    @CrudOMatic 9 років тому

    How to detect an ether wind? Find god. Ask him if he farted. If yes, go around the universe sniffing for a godfart.

  • @AadityaSaraf69
    @AadityaSaraf69 3 роки тому

    Well, why can't aether be at rest. Like universal rest, with everything moving relative to it.

  • @gemjourney5210
    @gemjourney5210 3 роки тому

    "Lucifereous👹Ether!"
    Nefarious!
    For his 👹name means
    "The Angel of Light!"...he travels as "Prince of the airwaves" thru "Mediums!"

  • @noneofyourbusiness5451
    @noneofyourbusiness5451 5 років тому

    You wouldn't be able to detect the ether like that if it was the movement of the ether causing the motion of the earth and the sun

    • @ajaxprimedq2191
      @ajaxprimedq2191 5 років тому

      Gravitational field is causing the motion of earth and sun tho

  • @andrewbodor4891
    @andrewbodor4891 2 роки тому

    No such thing. The aether is stationary. WE MOVE TOO SLOW TO DETECT THE RELATIVE "WIND". MUST MOVE CLOSE TO SPEED OF LIGHT TO SENSE THE "WIND".

  • @batuamparh
    @batuamparh 9 років тому +1

    i visit his channel just for the calculus and stuff cuz i study engineering but then... ether wind.... omg

  • @johnfoyer_alianna_el
    @johnfoyer_alianna_el 5 років тому

    The pursuit for the truth has led me here, the aether. The place between worlds. Between the particle mass of the physical and the cosmic background radiation of unformed particle mass that is the metaphysical lies the ethereal plane. It exists like a veil of the universe offering shelter from the ethereal winds. When we die our neural synaptic receptors shut down but the leftover life force energy that has been there all our life ensuring the beat of our heart and is the energy source of our thoughts. That electric charge does not die but detaches from the body and flows back into the universe. But there is a place and those that usher us back and forth to it. They come and collect the detached energies and transfer us through the tunnel into the shores of Avalon, the Duat, Hades, the Astral Plane, the Ethereal realm, the spiritual realm. It has many names and many descriptions all those were various descriptions and quotes from across history all describing what you unraveling here now. But its bigger than what your seeing. What your mathematical equations are pointing at is only the outer edges of what can be called a micro cosmic universe and like looking across the universe with Hubble you must finely tune the lenses properly to see within it and those we once knew that dwell within

    • @shayanmoosavi9139
      @shayanmoosavi9139 5 років тому

      Sounds like pseudoscience nonsense. It's impossible to take it seriously with those videos of yours.

    • @johnfoyer_alianna_el
      @johnfoyer_alianna_el 5 років тому

      @@shayanmoosavi9139 you must look beyond the veil of nonsense with your own understanding of it. See not what they are trying to explain. If you already possess knowledge in the subject merely amplify your knowledge through their image thus bringing a clearer message to those confused by stuff like this. It's what I do when I'm bored. Plus it allows me to correct my own misunderstandings and deepen my own knowledge on a subject

    • @shayanmoosavi9139
      @shayanmoosavi9139 5 років тому

      @@johnfoyer_alianna_el typical answer and totally predictable. Care to actually backing your claims up with actual scientific papers and studies instead of personal experience and pseudoscience?

    • @johnfoyer_alianna_el
      @johnfoyer_alianna_el 5 років тому

      @@shayanmoosavi9139 you smelly troll I fart in your general direction💨 ?👃? 👹🤮

    • @johnfoyer_alianna_el
      @johnfoyer_alianna_el 5 років тому

      @@shayanmoosavi9139 ua-cam.com/video/fhelSuCKlMs/v-deo.html

  • @Charles-xw2wy
    @Charles-xw2wy 6 років тому

    I thought that special relativity only functions without aether? I don’t want to waste 7 mins to watch, lol!

    • @Information_Seeker
      @Information_Seeker 5 років тому

      break the idea of aether down to the most basic part, "a medium through which light propogates in a vacuum", the only thing it can be would be spacetime itself, which explains why gravitational effects such as waves caused by black hole mergers, and light itself both travel at C

  • @SwedishNeo
    @SwedishNeo 8 років тому +1

    If it where an ether, why wouldn't it be affected by the sun's gravity in the same way as the earth and thus move simultaneously with our planet? Because by the sound of the video the ether would fixated in space unaffected by all the objects that causes both the sun and the earth to move.

    • @Ataensic
      @Ataensic 8 років тому

      You're right.. his example is flawed.
      Ether would not be moved by gravity because gravity is basically just a 3 dimensional Ether sink. (everything falling towards the null zone)
      i.e. Gravity is just an Ether pressure, the pressures that are responsible for moving the cosmic bodies.

    • @DallonJ
      @DallonJ 8 років тому

      I came to this conclusion and it fits with everything. I am amazed how thousands of others have come to the same conclusion and it is not the mainstream theory yet. CONSPIRACY COUGH COUGH COUGH.

    • @jesusdiazzz6369
      @jesusdiazzz6369 6 років тому

      gravity is just electromagnetic energy. ua-cam.com/video/vzY06MRzwPE/v-deo.html

  • @bargluftnationalism1054
    @bargluftnationalism1054 3 роки тому

    The earth does not move, thats the solution.

  • @engineerahmed7248
    @engineerahmed7248 6 років тому

    Doesn't Red shifting being analogs to Doppler effect clearly proves that sound has fixed velocity mach 1 in air light must have fixed velocity C in Aether. If we accept it all Einstein's theories become redundant. But Aether velocity was proved incorrect bcz they assumed aether to be fixed to sun which is not the case. But they r willing to accept Einstein's time & mass dilation assumption. Ridiculous. Aether can be a datum & the values Morley experiment found shows where the datum exist . It exist closer to earth than sun . Which then also explains y Axis of evil lines up closely with earth axis at 23 deg tilt.

    • @Information_Seeker
      @Information_Seeker 5 років тому

      cmon, think it through, break down the theory to it's most basic part, "a medium for light to propogate through in a vacuum" what's the one thing that exists in a vacuum that is affected by the existence of matter or energy, and travels at C just like light does?

  • @mebawubeshet6729
    @mebawubeshet6729 9 місяців тому

    it just nonsense how u prove the ether is moving?
    i do not get the point

  • @lambda4931
    @lambda4931 6 років тому +1

    Quite an assumption to think the ether moves in a uniform direction.

  • @tuusnullorum
    @tuusnullorum 7 років тому +1

    This is pretty dumb. Given how fast we're moving and how long we've been moving we would have come to a stop by now if the aether were both detectable and moving in opposition to the Earth. It makes much more sense if you consider the aether as integral to inertia and moving exactly as anything moves within it. If there were any relative motion to detect it would likely be some distance from the Earth (i.e. like a pressure wave in front of your hand moving through a pool.) Likewise you wouldn't see a difference in the propagation of light save for experiments of induced aether drag, like the Fizeau experiment.

    • @Mateus.007
      @Mateus.007 2 роки тому

      We are not moving, the Earth is the Center.

  • @wizzard211
    @wizzard211 3 роки тому

    You’re committing soo many fallacies here. Measure the ether against speed of light? You can’t measure water with water. Speed of light is the rate of inductions of ether itself. Light is not what IS, light is what DOES. Light is not the subject, light is the ATTRIBUTE

  • @donnacabot3550
    @donnacabot3550 6 років тому

    The laws of the universe r the same for the mind and conscience. Look into it.

  • @shellyhooper2125
    @shellyhooper2125 5 років тому

    Please, Dont use the metric system to measure distance.

  • @KonsiAimee
    @KonsiAimee 5 років тому +1

    there’s no ether

  • @gemjourney5210
    @gemjourney5210 3 роки тому

    YOU CANNOT DELETE THE TRUTH FOR YAH SHALL DELETE YOU FOR DOING SO!
    PROPHECY!
    COUNT ON IT!

  • @starshiptrooper9979
    @starshiptrooper9979 3 роки тому

    LIE! EARH IS FLAT!