The 1970's Chronograph REVIVAL You Won't Want to Miss!

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 13 гру 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 30

  • @christiantosumbung5791
    @christiantosumbung5791 7 місяців тому +2

    I think you forgot getting an ST1901 powered chronograph. As long as you don’t mind a manual wind. The Omega moon-watches are also in the same boat.

    • @EscapementWatch
      @EscapementWatch  7 місяців тому +3

      I bought a seagull 1963 with the st19 last year, solid choice

  • @Antonio_CN
    @Antonio_CN 4 місяці тому +1

    I have the blue dial and I love it

  • @BenMwatches
    @BenMwatches 7 місяців тому +3

    That’s a fantastic looking watch

  • @AmcoAutoGlass
    @AmcoAutoGlass 7 місяців тому +1

    this chrono is epic! thanks

  • @tcapd
    @tcapd 7 місяців тому +1

    Thank you for this very thorough review!

  • @RedwoodAggie
    @RedwoodAggie 5 місяців тому

    I had missed this video when it came out. This is a fantastic looking watch. It's not quite as fantastic as the green TAG Heuer glassbox chrono, but it is 42% of the cost. I think Vulcain in general is priced at a bit more of a premium price point than other small independents, but I think historically they were somewhat premium. I think the size looks great on your wrist in the far away shot.

    • @EscapementWatch
      @EscapementWatch  5 місяців тому +1

      I'm wearing it today actually. It's 👍

  • @HaonProductions
    @HaonProductions 7 місяців тому

    12.6 thick including the crystal or at the case?

  • @AX7razor
    @AX7razor 7 місяців тому +6

    It's a good looking watch! But at this price I expect a vertical clutch for a column wheel. The use of Genuine leather for a 2000$ watch was not something that I expected. Good watch but I prefer the Baltic Tricompax (same movement) or I would just save my money for a Seiko SQ series chronograph, which uses a vertical clutch! Anyway, Great video!

    • @petermartin9494
      @petermartin9494 6 місяців тому +1

      "The use of Genuine leather for a 2000$ watch was not something that I expected." What? Why?

    • @EscapementWatch
      @EscapementWatch  5 місяців тому +2

      he said that because "genuine leather" means its of the lowest possible quality. When you buy a leather strap look for "real leather" or "true leather labels"

    • @keefw361
      @keefw361 2 місяці тому

      Ye it's a rebrand basically a glorified micro brand. Vulcains history died decades ago. I buy a Hanhart 417 Es for the same money and that's a genuine classic by a heritage brand. Steve McQueens favourite watch too

  • @NicoBeaucrane
    @NicoBeaucrane 7 місяців тому +1

    very good chronograph, very classy and not very thick compared to sports chronographs. I have the panda version also in limited version. I'm almost tempted to buy another color. plus I bought it for 1700 euros instead of the current 2600.

    • @Caesar-ww3yp
      @Caesar-ww3yp 7 місяців тому

      How did you buy it at that price?

    • @NicoBeaucrane
      @NicoBeaucrane 7 місяців тому

      @@Caesar-ww3yp sales

  • @Mhmad-h4d
    @Mhmad-h4d 7 місяців тому +1

    Wow very nice 😍😍😍

  • @mattsmiley8156
    @mattsmiley8156 7 місяців тому +2

    That strap is a spit in the face. Love the domed crystal, but the design isn’t special.

  • @petermartin9494
    @petermartin9494 6 місяців тому

    That watch is just not competitive. And no display back = no deal.

    • @Therealgdoesgshit
      @Therealgdoesgshit 5 місяців тому +1

      They’re making vintage like watches/reissues why care about display backs ? That’s not a thing of the past , when you seek elegance you seek size fit case design domed crystals etc no display backs

  • @nathanmagnuson2589
    @nathanmagnuson2589 5 місяців тому

    Vulcains releases have consistently been overpriced imo, nice watches that look great but I cant justify spending the money

  • @darkdad55
    @darkdad55 4 місяці тому

    2k for a printed dial. Nah pass