Prevent Collisions in Autodesk Fusion with Machine Simulation
Вставка
- Опубліковано 28 чер 2024
- Machine Simulation in Autodesk Fusion has become an extremely valuable tool to many users, especially those doing multi-axis machining. By helping users detect collisions, this functionality brings a new level of confidence to the table.
Detecting collisions is just one way Autodesk Fusion helps users make better toolpaths and programs. Its benefits now extend to tool type and length selection, part positioning on the table, and the confidence that the setup, tools, and toolpaths chosen are going to perform as planned.
Collision detection in Fusion can check for collisions between tools, the machine, model components, in-process stock, tool holders, and fixtures. This video focuses on milling, but collision detection is available for lathes and other machines.
One thing to note is that, currently, linking moves between toolpaths are not collision checked. This is something we are still working on.
If you find the content of this video useful, please hit the LIKE button so we know to make more videos like it! Also, make sure to subscribe so you don't miss what's new and next in Autodesk Fusion.
Learn how Machine Builder works in this video: • Learn How Machine Buil...
Learn how Machine Simulation works in this video: • How to Use Machine Sim...
Time Stamps:
00:00 - Prevent collisions in Autodesk Fusion with Machine Simulation!
01:52 - Simulate before calculations are completed
02:27 - Introduction to the Simulation timeline
03:21 - See your NC code during simulation
03:25 - Linking the simulation, timeline, and NC code
►FREE TRIAL | autode.sk/3Wtfi20
►SUBSCRIBE | autode.sk/30njGGX
►GET STARTED | autode.sk/30k2DWh
►TRY AN EXTENSION | autode.sk/3EOUidW
CONNECT with Fusion on social media:
INSTAGRAM | autode.sk/2Enzh8P
TWITTER | autode.sk/45cIYTK
LINKEDIN | autode.sk/3UyieZS
FACEBOOK | autode.sk/3WaaZLb - Наука та технологія
The Tool Library could be further advanced.
There is no need for scripts to create a tool holder to carry out simulations, more detail in the tool holder simulations, being able to choose the driven tool holder for Lathe, more power of choice when creating a lathe tool.
In the Drills section in the speed and feed category, you can save the default peck.
Being able to create subcategories for feed and speed of different machines.
Be nice if cam softwares would also simulate the posted gcode as we'll to make double sure posted code is good
NX and hypermill can do this.. I cant imagine to trust only toolpath simulation without simulating real posted Gcode with all movements, pre-positioning etc..
Could you please make a current instructions video about the machine builder?
I have four five-axis and two four-axis machine models, that I created when the module was still brand new.
After Update, I have problems with the cooling M-commands.
It would also be interesting to see how a machine like the DMGMorie Evo series can be configured. Because of its 45 degree swivel system
Have you watched their recent videos on the topic? They've posted a couple over the last month.
@@ScottMoyse
Yeah, i looked at them.
But for someone how is using the machine builder for some time now, it doesn't really help.
It's more like a beginners Guide.
I need an advanced Video.
For Machines like the DMG Evo Series.
I know Fusion can simulate it.
Here a video: /5aUU8mRD2Ig?si=WjqiRgEPb8bVCFeN
The axis of this machine are not 90 degrees to each other.
My other problem is:
I want to use through spindle coolant.
Machine is setup with spindel coolant in the machine builder.
In the Post Processor the Coolant is setup as well.
If I Post the code i get the correct Coolant.
But while Programming, Fusion reminds me with every procedure, that the currently selected maschine does not support spindle coolant.
Not with every maschine i have, but with some of them.
Oh no my flex tokens expired after only a year. My punishment for giving Autodesk too much money is needing to give them even more money...
MultiAxis and the token paywall model is too expensive but we all know Autodesk doesnt care about customers. Im even willing to pay but not at those price points.
if you have a 5 axis its not rlly expensive
3 + 2 axes offer you everything a hobbyist needs.
If you need full 5-axis capabilities, good luck finding software at a better price point that can do everything Fusion can do.
If you're serious about CAM programming, $1000 a year isn't really much.
We use 2 CAM software at my workplace.
During the VIRUS, I was able to program from home without much fuss.
My colleague tried using remote desktop tools and almost went crazy because of the lag.
(Physical Dongle systems are still a thing with a lot of the softwares)
The other software costs $6,500 per year and lacks many of Fusion's features.
The adaptive cleaning logic of Fusion is also one of the best.
@@glamenz I learned 5 axis machining with the pocketnc making rest tool paths, it was really really easy for me to understand. Fusion used to have 5 axis machining enabled then Autodesk decided to be greedy. I loved it then. I recently got back to it and discovered the douche paywall autodesk put up so I was like WTF!
@@strongme80 I can undersand your pain.
I relly really really hate subscription models.
Fusion is the only exception for me.
Development of this tool takes a lot of work and the market is not as big.
As long as Fusion reinvests the money they make in constatly upgrding the system, im ok with paying.
Im using Autosek server server capacity for remote working.
Im getting constant free tutorial videos for the new stuff.
Features are getting added for free, that cost 1000$ in other systems.
But if you want to use a 5-Axis Maschine, the 3+2 is still free.
The ceapest fully synchronous 5 axis at my workplace is 250K, so the addet cost for the full Multi Achses Feature is not that big of a deal for me.
For a Hobbyist its not really worth it.
@@strongme80
I can undersand your pain.
I relly really really hate subscription models.
Fusion is the only exception for me.
Development of this tool takes a lot of work and the market is not as big.
As long as Fusion reinvests the money they make in constatly upgrding the system, im ok with paying.
Im using Autosek server capacity for remote working.
Im getting constant free tutorial videos for the new stuff.
Features are getting added for free, that cost 1000$ in other systems.
But if you want to use a 5-Axis Maschine, the 3+2 is still free.
The ceapest fully synchronous 5 axis at my workplace is 250K, so the addet cost for the full Multi Achses Feature is not that big of a deal for me.
For a Hobbyist its not really worth it.