Lecture 18: Weight and Balance

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 21 гру 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 18

  • @abhimanyurai9206
    @abhimanyurai9206 3 роки тому +11

    Ms.Tina lectures are great starts from very basic concept.

  • @fardinjalat9882
    @fardinjalat9882 2 роки тому

    Good

  • @random_view-r
    @random_view-r 7 днів тому

    Shreya Ghoshal is good at this too 🙆🏻‍♂️🙆🏻‍♂️

  • @walter007
    @walter007 4 роки тому

    UCE PRESENTE

  • @y-kinghooks3883
    @y-kinghooks3883 3 роки тому +3

    Ms. Tina looking beautiful you and your smile..

  • @thecriss88
    @thecriss88 3 роки тому +2

    It's weird to see that such a serious school as MIT don't use metric system to calculate moments. Everyone on the world (except of the US) who graduated 7 or 8 classes of school knows that the unit of moment is Nm

    • @3rdworldgarage450
      @3rdworldgarage450 2 роки тому +2

      Its about communicating in a common language. In terms of flying a plane, that language is not engineering or science but piloting and what the FAA expects you to know. Using a different languauge would not let you communicate effectively with other pilots in the US.

    • @nikolasbaumann4070
      @nikolasbaumann4070 2 роки тому

      @@3rdworldgarage450 exactly!... its about communicating in a common language. So why doesnt the US use a sensible system of units (maybe the one everyone else uses since theres nothing wrong with it)?

    • @gopalgupta535
      @gopalgupta535 2 роки тому

      Weight and balance of Aircraft and CG Calculation
      ua-cam.com/video/issipoi1VkY/v-deo.html

    • @brucesummers4006
      @brucesummers4006 2 роки тому +2

      The weight & balance, performance, type certificate data were derived when the plane was certified and most units were US Customary System units. The POH (Pilot Operating Handbook) for the 172 is mostly in USC. So when you go to the chart to see if the plane is within the CG envelope, it's in inches aft of datum.

    • @ChristopherKelly-vt3tl
      @ChristopherKelly-vt3tl Рік тому

      @@nikolasbaumann4070 Because the common language isn't what you think it is when you're talking about aviation.