If the mass of both the concaved bat and traditional bat is the same, the momentum of the bat in a given shot will be the same, therefore giving the same momentum to the ball. Bigger edges will reduce how easily the bat rotates when hit nearer the edge of the blade making the ball more likely to go in the intended direction.
thats clever to explain force = mass * acceleration. which is correct. providing both bats have exactly the same mass (as you say weight) and have the same centre of gravity (sweet spot location). The only thing that is left is the transfer of energy from both the bats from 1) the centre 2) to off centre i.le edges... in the case of 1) the I'm not aware of any test done to say in either way, but in the case of 2) i know the concaving bat will retain its structural rigifty more in off centre shots. so for off centre shots its better. most those shots may not make bulk of the shots so is it worth it.
Zhafran Azhar not at all. My concaving is very gentle so not much difference in them but if you take the extreme concaving that many major companies do you have taken the majority of the guts out of the hitting area. That's why I've used my knowledge as a professional cricketer as a coach and put them in to my bat making skills
Thanks for this video Paul. Great explanation. I think the unfortunate thing is that it is only people that really think about their cricket that understand what you mean. I was speaking to a guy at cricket the other day, who had been playing cricket for years, you didn't understand why bulk made huge concaving was a bad thing.
A really good demonstration. Thanks.
If the mass of both the concaved bat and traditional bat is the same, the momentum of the bat in a given shot will be the same, therefore giving the same momentum to the ball. Bigger edges will reduce how easily the bat rotates when hit nearer the edge of the blade making the ball more likely to go in the intended direction.
thats clever to explain force = mass * acceleration. which is correct. providing both bats have exactly the same mass (as you say weight) and have the same centre of gravity (sweet spot location). The only thing that is left is the transfer of energy from both the bats from 1) the centre 2) to off centre i.le edges...
in the case of 1) the I'm not aware of any test done to say in either way,
but in the case of 2) i know the concaving bat will retain its structural rigifty more in off centre shots. so for off centre shots its better.
most those shots may not make bulk of the shots so is it worth it.
Excellent video .. great way of explaining the details Thank you very much
Thanks Paul. Very well explained and demonstrated video.
You nailed the shape.
Im not sure what are you trying to say, but that concave bat has more hitting area from the way you demonstrate it
Zhafran Azhar not at all. My concaving is very gentle so not much difference in them but if you take the extreme concaving that many major companies do you have taken the majority of the guts out of the hitting area. That's why I've used my knowledge as a professional cricketer as a coach and put them in to my bat making skills
Thanks mate.
Thanks for this video Paul. Great explanation.
I think the unfortunate thing is that it is only people that really think about their cricket that understand what you mean.
I was speaking to a guy at cricket the other day, who had been playing cricket for years, you didn't understand why bulk made huge concaving was a bad thing.
How did you get your brand name
Priyank Jain it’s my name
Aldred Cricket Bats I thought it was from Star wars