I think Intel should have added two P-cores across the i9, i7 and i5 '14th gen' plus at least a 50% Cache size increase to answer the AMD '3D' variant CPUs. The engineering for copy / paste would not have been that overwhelming and the consumers would have gobbled them up!
.. I'm keeping my i9-13900K but I'm replacing it once Nvidia's next GPU is released i.e. 'RTX 5090.' I worded it that way because the next Nvidia GPU isn't being released until 2025. So that would leave me with a Toc (16th) gen Intel CPU. Probably the Arrow Lake Refresh (ARL-R).
@@DJaquithFL I’m thinking that the current process architecture could not handle the additional P-cores with the power draws and heat that the 13th and 14th gens create.. that is an excellent plan in terms of upgrade timelines as a consumer! Skip the most likely unstable new architecture and chipsets and get the refinement of the refresh along with a nice new GPU generation as well. I am thinking
I think Intel should have added two P-cores across the i9, i7 and i5 '14th gen' plus at least a 50% Cache size increase to answer the AMD '3D' variant CPUs. The engineering for copy / paste would not have been that overwhelming and the consumers would have gobbled them up!
.. I'm keeping my i9-13900K but I'm replacing it once Nvidia's next GPU is released i.e. 'RTX 5090.' I worded it that way because the next Nvidia GPU isn't being released until 2025. So that would leave me with a Toc (16th) gen Intel CPU. Probably the Arrow Lake Refresh (ARL-R).
@@DJaquithFL I’m thinking that the current process architecture could not handle the additional P-cores with the power draws and heat that the 13th and 14th gens create.. that is an excellent plan in terms of upgrade timelines as a consumer! Skip the most likely unstable new architecture and chipsets and get the refinement of the refresh along with a nice new GPU generation as well. I am thinking
@@techtoniksystems .. There's plenty of room left on the die so it's Intel being cheap and lazy.