It’s funny how people don’t understand the difference between Overpriced and underrated 😂🤦🏾♂️ Caicedo has been the most consistent midfielder all season and nobody’s talking about it
100%. When he plays well everyone says that that's what they payed for, meanwhile if he plays poorly (Which he rarely does) they say that they can't believe he's a 115 million pound player. Can't win
Your price tag surely correlates to how people rate you? If Harry Maguire had cost 5m nobody would really care how he played. If Kante had cost Leicester 120m then he'd have been rated differently. Pretty much how it works
Rivals pretend Chelsea are the only ones who wanted him. Liverpool bid the same amount Chelsea did for Caicedo and offered even bigger wages but he still choose Chelsea
@@bookclub5021 exactly my point. Chelsea had refused to go past 90m. Liverpool caused the mess by splashing 110m without even agreeing with the player first. Now, their fans are hating on the same player they were willing to break their record for if he hadn't rejected them. Funny guys😂😂
@@footballgospel1342 naah i am fine with Ryan and Alexis for 70 mils :) you hold to Moises and the injury prone Lavia , no problem :) Only 160 mils for both of them ? :) Seems like a bargain :D :D
It was his debut game in which he gave away a penalty that ruined his reputation. He's been dropping consistently 7-8 out of 10 performances since than.
How are people in the comments getting confused by the word ‘underrated’ just because he cost £115 million? 🤣 underrated means he’s better than the rating most people are giving him. It has nothing to do with how much he cost.
Bhavs said he isn’t a 6 because of the game he played against United in a semi final. He lost the ball ‘bare’ times. Lost possession 10 times and 9 of those were from progressive passing. Please watch football with your eyes before painting stupid narratives. Caicedo is. 6/8 hybrid
Yea these lots know nothing about our team They blame Enzo for caicedo's errors last season Lavia x caicedo is not working for us. Enzo will be back soon People don't understand his importance .
@DRSportsClips are they? Surely you rate things based on how much they cost. If you buy a car for £100 and one for £150,000 you expect the more expensive one to be better.
@@magikarpsplashy doesn't mean the expensive car can't receive praise though... just because Caicedo costs a lot doesn't mean you can't praise him when he's playing well....
Learn the use of words then come back with your question. He's been the best midfielder in the Prem this season but gets no praise because of his price tag
You realise the only reason he cost so much was cos Liverpool jumped in and offered 110 without an agreement with the player when Chelsea had decided not to go beyond 90 so it wasn’t really his fault or Chelsea’s fault, Liverpool just came to mess up the settings
@@magikarpsplashy yeah they did, otherwise they risk losing the player to Liverpool cos Brighton was gonna accept the higher offer even though the player and Chelsea had an agreement. Yes, they didn’t have to but they needed to if they wanted the player
@itiswhatitis2767 right, so you wrote that entire comment just to say what I said 😂 they agreed to pay that amount therefore he's judged by that amount 🤷
@@magikarpsplashy No, he’s not, cos the player has nothing to do with his valuation. You can choose to judge him by the amount paid, that’s your choice. As for me, the market isn’t always been dictated by the quality of the player and like I said, Chelsea thought he was worth 80 at most, Brighton pushed for 90 which they eventually agreed to and then Liverpool came and messed it up by offering over 100m, that has nothing to do with the player, that’s the market inflating his value due to competition. Sure, Chelsea can walk way and he would be with Liverpool right now, they didn’t want that, so they paid the fee, that doesn’t mean that’s his value, it’s merely his price and I hope you understand the difference
Nobody is underrating Caicedo hes a very good DM/Midfielder but Chelsea paid the most rediculous amount of money to purchase him. Brighton won the lotterry and then some.
Bhavs said he isn’t a 6 because of the game he played against United in a semi final. He lost the ball ‘bare’ times. Lost possession 10 times and 9 of those were from progressive passing. Please watch football with your eyes before painting stupid narratives. Caicedo is. 6/8 hybrid
It’s funny how people don’t understand the difference between Overpriced and underrated 😂🤦🏾♂️ Caicedo has been the most consistent midfielder all season and nobody’s talking about it
100%.
When he plays well everyone says that that's what they payed for, meanwhile if he plays poorly (Which he rarely does) they say that they can't believe he's a 115 million pound player. Can't win
Your price tag surely correlates to how people rate you? If Harry Maguire had cost 5m nobody would really care how he played. If Kante had cost Leicester 120m then he'd have been rated differently. Pretty much how it works
I’ve gone through the comments and I can’t believe the amount of people that don’t understand.
@@magikarpsplashy Couldn't have said better 👏
Gravenberch is better , chill mate ...
Chelsea heritage:
Makelele - Essien - Kante - Caicedo
Ramirez and Obi-Mikel underrated
@@Iamwhatyousayiam Matic as well. Lavia if he stays fit could be with these players
Rivals pretend Chelsea are the only ones who wanted him. Liverpool bid the same amount Chelsea did for Caicedo and offered even bigger wages but he still choose Chelsea
Arsenal bid 70m and Liverpool bid 110m. He's baller, all the top clubs and their fans knew it.
@@bookclub5021 exactly lol they all act like he's not a baller but all their clubs were putting down money for him as well lol...
@@bookclub5021 exactly my point. Chelsea had refused to go past 90m. Liverpool caused the mess by splashing 110m without even agreeing with the player first. Now, their fans are hating on the same player they were willing to break their record for if he hadn't rejected them. Funny guys😂😂
@@footballgospel1342 naah i am fine with Ryan and Alexis for 70 mils :) you hold to Moises and the injury prone Lavia , no problem :) Only 160 mils for both of them ? :) Seems like a bargain :D :D
It was his debut game in which he gave away a penalty that ruined his reputation. He's been dropping consistently 7-8 out of 10 performances since than.
How are people in the comments getting confused by the word ‘underrated’ just because he cost £115 million? 🤣 underrated means he’s better than the rating most people are giving him. It has nothing to do with how much he cost.
I'm a West Ham fan and saw Caceido completely dominate Declan Rice when we played Brighton.
Why do Other clubs who cant do Transfers and stay profitable, fires shots on our Transfer dealings. I smell envy!!
Bhavs said he isn’t a 6 because of the game he played against United in a semi final. He lost the ball ‘bare’ times. Lost possession 10 times and 9 of those were from progressive passing. Please watch football with your eyes before painting stupid narratives. Caicedo is. 6/8 hybrid
We never played United in a semi final so I don’t know what he’s talking about
@ I think he’s talking about United playing Brighton in the 22/23 season
Enzo has been found out is hilarious
Save the energy u had last season when talking about chelsea players. I've kept alllllll receipts.
underrated ?
Why he's done fckall and still not one of the top 5 in the league let's all stop this sillyness becouse Chelsea beat Noah ffs
Caicedo >>>>>Rice
Yeah coz arsenal ate are a top side give a rest 😂😂
Yea these lots know nothing about our team
They blame Enzo for caicedo's errors last season
Lavia x caicedo is not working for us. Enzo will be back soon
People don't understand his importance
.
Lavia x Caicedo isn’t working? It’s our best pairing by far.
yeah, you clearly don't watch the games
What are you on about?
clearly you smoked crack b4 commenting.
Enzo is passive in midfield.
Underrated is a word unsuitable for someone who cost 116M euros
Underrated and undervalued are two different things
underrated in terms of the praise he should be getting from the media not his price tag...
Then you don't know what the word underrated means.
@DRSportsClips are they? Surely you rate things based on how much they cost. If you buy a car for £100 and one for £150,000 you expect the more expensive one to be better.
@@magikarpsplashy doesn't mean the expensive car can't receive praise though... just because Caicedo costs a lot doesn't mean you can't praise him when he's playing well....
he was fucking 120M, how underrated?
underrated in terms of praise not price tag...
Do you even know what underrated means?
Learn the use of words then come back with your question. He's been the best midfielder in the Prem this season but gets no praise because of his price tag
Liverpool bid the same amount for him. Obviously a top top player
Still salty coz he rejected Liverpool 😂
If he's underrated and he cost 115m he must be a mixture I'd Zidane and Makelele 😂
You realise the only reason he cost so much was cos Liverpool jumped in and offered 110 without an agreement with the player when Chelsea had decided not to go beyond 90 so it wasn’t really his fault or Chelsea’s fault, Liverpool just came to mess up the settings
@itiswhatitis2767 Chelsea didn't have to pay 115m though so that excuse is shocking
@@magikarpsplashy
yeah they did, otherwise they risk losing the player to Liverpool cos Brighton was gonna accept the higher offer even though the player and Chelsea had an agreement.
Yes, they didn’t have to but they needed to if they wanted the player
@itiswhatitis2767 right, so you wrote that entire comment just to say what I said 😂 they agreed to pay that amount therefore he's judged by that amount 🤷
@@magikarpsplashy
No, he’s not, cos the player has nothing to do with his valuation. You can choose to judge him by the amount paid, that’s your choice. As for me, the market isn’t always been dictated by the quality of the player and like I said, Chelsea thought he was worth 80 at most, Brighton pushed for 90 which they eventually agreed to and then Liverpool came and messed it up by offering over 100m, that has nothing to do with the player, that’s the market inflating his value due to competition. Sure, Chelsea can walk way and he would be with Liverpool right now, they didn’t want that, so they paid the fee, that doesn’t mean that’s his value, it’s merely his price and I hope you understand the difference
115 mil underrated 😂😂😂😂
So many people like you who don't actually know what underrated means. You do realize there's a difference between undervalued and underrated right?
Everybody knows he was over priced. But his performance especially as been going unnoticed
Nobody is underrating Caicedo hes a very good DM/Midfielder but Chelsea paid the most rediculous amount of money to purchase him.
Brighton won the lotterry and then some.
You have poor ball knowledge tbh
Would you have said the same if Liverpool ended up getting him over 100m?
@@Iamwhatyousayiam 100%
Bhavs said he isn’t a 6 because of the game he played against United in a semi final. He lost the ball ‘bare’ times. Lost possession 10 times and 9 of those were from progressive passing. Please watch football with your eyes before painting stupid narratives. Caicedo is. 6/8 hybrid