DOCUMENTARY The End of the Scharnhorst

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 26 сер 2024
  • I do not own, nor do I or intend to profit from this content whatsoever. "Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use."

КОМЕНТАРІ • 100

  • @garyhill2740
    @garyhill2740 Рік тому +6

    Scharnhorst is described as Germany's last serviceable major unit in the video. Tirpitz was still serviceable in 1943. She did not become irreparably damaged until 1944.
    Strange that Scharnhorst was sent out on such a mission, but every time Tirpitz had an opportunity to intercept a convoy, Hitler ordered her back to anchorage.
    Had Tirpitz been present at North Cape under similarcircumstances, she might have survived.
    That said, this is a very enjoyable video and it's great that it's available for naval history nuts like me to view and enjoy.

    • @WojeLechistanu
      @WojeLechistanu Рік тому

      and Churchill had obsession of Tirpitz...

    • @canerguener8664
      @canerguener8664 Рік тому

      Any historic sources for Hitlers "tactic" ?

    • @Trek001
      @Trek001 Місяць тому +2

      _Scharnhorst_ *WAS* the only serviceable heavy unit - _Tirpitz_ was under repairs from the Operation Source attack on her on 22nd September of 1943 with the damage needing almost 7 months of stationary repairs

    • @CRAIGKMSBISMARCKTIRPITZ533
      @CRAIGKMSBISMARCKTIRPITZ533 Місяць тому

      Hitler's Ship's Were & Are Male's Not Females. My GrandFather's Served On KMS'S GNEISENAU,SCHARNHORST,BISMARCK & TIRPITZ 😃

    • @Trek001
      @Trek001 Місяць тому +1

      @CRAIGKMSBISMARCKTIRPITZ533 If he served on _Bismarck_ then it is highly unlikely he was on _Tirpitz_

  • @williamkz
    @williamkz Рік тому +5

    Breath takingly good documentary. Congratulations to everyone involved in making it.

    • @WojciechWachniewski-st1zm
      @WojciechWachniewski-st1zm Місяць тому +1

      Quite right, but please DO NOT FORGET the role of Polish mathematicians in breaking of the Enigma! They were but three, but their work was excellent. Their names were M Rejewski, J Różycki and H Zygalski. Only after their efforts the breaking of the Enigma at BP became possible. 😊🇵🇱🇬🇧♍

    • @williamkz
      @williamkz Місяць тому

      @@WojciechWachniewski-st1zm Good point. Thank you.

  • @Romulus980
    @Romulus980 3 роки тому +14

    Scharnhorst achieved one of the longest-range naval gunfire hits in history.

    • @KatyushaLauncher
      @KatyushaLauncher 3 роки тому +5

      The same as HMS Warspite, both of them landed a hit to a ship at the range of about 26,000 yards

    • @robertewing3114
      @robertewing3114 3 роки тому +3

      Only on a carrier crawling along with a captain holding a placard over the side of the bridge saying You can't miss mate!

    • @ashermccready
      @ashermccready 3 роки тому +5

      @@robertewing3114 meanwhile that shot isn't even the coolest thing warspite did lol, that ship was almost unbelievably tenacious.

    • @robertewing3114
      @robertewing3114 3 роки тому +2

      @@ashermccready Chamberlain said Cunningham has a great reputation as a fighter and I am sure he won't miss a chance. Cape Matapan, chance taken. Chamberlain ruled the waves, and effectively still does. Cunningham and Warspite, may they all be remembered with the respect they deserve, irrespective of the Battle Ensign not flying during that battle, Senior Service Moments!

  • @glebz7294
    @glebz7294 3 роки тому +10

    Wow! Really interesting documentary on Kriegsmarine's demise. Thank you for posting it online!

    • @thatnorwegianguy1986
      @thatnorwegianguy1986 2 роки тому +1

      And old Kriegsmarine veteran visited my small town many years ago he called Norway the grave of Kriegsmarine.
      First the germans lost the Blucher when they invaded after it was sunk by a land fort in the Oslo fjord, then the battle of Narvik that cost the German navy dearly, Scharnhorst and the Tirpitz all of these losses in Norway.

  • @raspberryjam8563
    @raspberryjam8563 4 роки тому +7

    What do you call a ship with cruiser like guns, battleship like armor, destroyer like speed you call it scharnhorst

  • @JeffreyOrnstein
    @JeffreyOrnstein 3 роки тому +2

    Very good, thanks. This is a much better copy of the same video to be found elsewhere on UA-cam.

  • @benlaskowski357
    @benlaskowski357 4 роки тому +6

    A note on strategy: the U-Boats were supposed to force the merchant traffic to convoy, allowing the surface warships to attack them. The German surface fleet was, regretfully, too small to do much of the latter.

    • @apieceofdirt4681
      @apieceofdirt4681 Рік тому

      Regretfully?? You sound saddened that the German Navy didn’t have the surface combatants to challenge the Royal Navy to a successful fleet engagement. Luckily the Royal Navy DID have the resources to destroy what was left of naval Naziism.

  • @robertjones-eb4xo
    @robertjones-eb4xo 2 роки тому +1

    Have to raise an eyebrow, when Navy chief said "Regretted sinking Her , not pleasant" ! Oh dear.

  • @joypops1
    @joypops1 4 роки тому +2

    Absolutely Incredible.
    Thank You.

  • @pwelchster
    @pwelchster 4 роки тому +9

    Fantastic documentary! Thank you for posting.

  • @spencerderosier6649
    @spencerderosier6649 2 роки тому +3

    Scharnhorst will echo in eternity

  • @Firebird400
    @Firebird400 4 роки тому +5

    Think those ships would pass emissions testing lol ? Great video tho I really enjoyed it.

  • @scabbycatcat4202
    @scabbycatcat4202 4 місяці тому

    This documentary gives scant credit to the pivotal roll the DOY played. It was DOY phenomenal accuracy of her gunnery that was the deciding factor. Also after receiving considerable damage it looked for a while that she was actually going to escape and it was only a shell from DOY that hit her boiler room and slowed her to 20kts that allowed DOY and the cruisers to finish her off. To say she received 5 torpedo hits at the time they implied is simply mistaken. She only received those hits AFTER she had been slowed by DOY. Typical British production. We always give maximum credit to foreigners yet cannot manage to do the same for our own.

  • @sanjayawijenayake9851
    @sanjayawijenayake9851 4 роки тому +2

    Thank you

  • @thadtuiol1717
    @thadtuiol1717 3 роки тому +2

    Churchill might've been a great politician and leader, but as a military man he was an utter disaster.

    • @NashmanNash
      @NashmanNash 3 роки тому

      @Chong Li Well..Churchill is responsible for Gallipoli,...

  • @nicokern7615
    @nicokern7615 3 роки тому +6

    Scharnhorst and her sistership Gneisenau were no battlecruisers, they were battleships. The critical difference between battleships and battlecruisers was armour, not their main guns. Scharnhorst and Gneisenau were heavily armoured, some parts were even stronger than on the Bismarck class, and nobody would say the Bismarck and the Tirpitz were no battleships.

    • @jesse8381
      @jesse8381 3 роки тому +5

      Both Scharnhorst and Gneisenau was meant to be battleships but ended up being battlecruisers, yes they have preety good armor and guns however both ships cant fight a battleship on their own cause they both have only 11 inch guns,
      Plus her speed.

    • @peterson7082
      @peterson7082 3 роки тому +2

      @@jesse8381 They were battleships in name and doctrine, regardless of armament.

    • @NashmanNash
      @NashmanNash 3 роки тому +2

      @@kms_scharnhorst Well,Nassau is a dreadnought...Even developed BEFORE HMS Dreadnought^^

    • @NashmanNash
      @NashmanNash 3 роки тому

      @@kms_scharnhorst congratulations,you played yourself...According to your speed requirement,the South Carolinas weren't dreadnoughts either.According to your armament requirements,neither were...Basically everything that came after the Bellerophons.
      Nassau had a uniform main battery of twelve 11inch guns,the 150mm did not count as an intermediate caliber as for example the 24cm guns Wittelsbach carried for example

    • @NashmanNash
      @NashmanNash 3 роки тому +1

      @@kms_scharnhorst Actually i have only shown that the armament and speed requirements you have given are...not exactly the best...I didn't even go into Nassaus earlier designs because quite frankly,i was too lazy to look it up again.
      At this point you would actually have to make an argument why South Carolina is a dreadnought and Nassau isn't(Speed) or why Nassaus 150mm and 88mm guns disqualify her because of "the lack of a uniform main battery" Those calibers where not considered intermediate,and most dreadnoughts and super dreadnoughts carrier a secondary battery roughly in this range

  • @bloodrave9578
    @bloodrave9578 4 роки тому +4

    How prophetic Raeder was.

  • @jomon723
    @jomon723 4 роки тому +3

    Great Overkill" All those young men deep inside"

  • @YINGYANGPOLARBEAR
    @YINGYANGPOLARBEAR 4 роки тому +4

    Great documentary, but I'd ask whoever is in charge of the music to slow down on the cocaine

  • @GUNCHEECHEE
    @GUNCHEECHEE 3 роки тому

    living in milton keynes its weird to go past blechley park knowing the history of it

  • @kenlowe3673
    @kenlowe3673 2 роки тому +3

    Not bad, except that a number of times in the commentary, the Scharnhorst & Gneisenau are referred to as 'pocket battleships'. This of course is wrong, - they were full-sized ones. The pocket battleships were the much smaller Deutschland, Admiral Hipper and Admiral Graf Spee.

    • @Trek001
      @Trek001 Місяць тому

      They would have been using the terms used by the RN at the time - BBC rules on this subject were very clear

  • @trevorday7923
    @trevorday7923 Рік тому

    ...And the Lancasters which sank the Tirpitz were from 617 Squadron, The Dam Busters

  • @WojciechWachniewski-st1zm
    @WojciechWachniewski-st1zm Місяць тому

    What do you think, friends, of naming some modern German warships with traditional names like 'Scharnhorst' or 'Gneisenau'? Both men have their well-deserved places in the military history of the country; so far, thre were four Gneisenaus and three Scharnhorsts with three German navies. Strangely enough, the famous names first appeared on the bows and sterns of... small passenger vessels under the flag of the NDL. One 'Scharnhorst', with the gross tonnage of ca. 18.200 register tonnes, entered the German maritime history as the first big passenger ship ever built in the 3rd Reich. Her career was a strange one, as she ended up under... Japanese colours, converted into a carrier (!) Her flight deck proved too short, to allow modern aircraft to land on it. The planes starting from the 'Shinyo' had to find bigger ships with longer decks to land on... ♍🇵🇱👍🇯🇵👍

  • @cvan7681
    @cvan7681 2 роки тому

    Can anyone else hear the Star wars music tracks playing in the background?

  • @MichaelOnRockyTop
    @MichaelOnRockyTop 2 роки тому +1

    What of the destroyers that dispatched to find the convoy?

  • @davy1458
    @davy1458 2 роки тому

    I think the term "wonder weapons"......would be more appropriately defined as "wacky weapons"

  • @windborne8795
    @windborne8795 3 роки тому +3

    The context here is wrong in so many ways. Good enough for anyone who isn't a naval buff. However, so many details here are all wrong...

  • @isilder
    @isilder 3 роки тому

    The explanation of how difficult enigma was totally messed up. With 26 letters in the alphabet, a repeat of one key press (eg of K's) encoding to the same encoding letter (G then G ) , was most likely within 20 presses of K away ... nothing like millions of millions... What there are millions of millions of are settings, so that even if you have an enigma machine, you can't test out all the settings in the month that they used the same settings..This was due to the settings of the rotors and plug boards.

    • @NashmanNash
      @NashmanNash 3 роки тому

      Also,the capturing and decoding of Enigma,atleast for the U Boat warfare is slightly overstated in my eyes...The Naval Charts captured were nearly as important..for example,what can you do if the information that U 1234 is to go do Square BD4359,if you dont have a german naval map to actually find out where that is

  • @davy1458
    @davy1458 3 роки тому

    Pindi was a brave fool....I give him that

  • @doszymona81
    @doszymona81 Рік тому

    I wonder if ever Brits will admit, that Enigma secrets was broken by Poles...

    • @cliffrightmove1527
      @cliffrightmove1527 Місяць тому

      Now don’t tell me your Polish 🤣🤣🤣🤣

    • @doszymona81
      @doszymona81 Місяць тому

      @@cliffrightmove1527 who cares who Am I?

    • @cliffrightmove1527
      @cliffrightmove1527 Місяць тому

      @@doszymona81 absolutely right WHO CARE NELLY 👍

    • @doszymona81
      @doszymona81 Місяць тому

      @@cliffrightmove1527 Ignorance is only one step away from stupidity, as you prove beautifully. Be happy you "five o'clocker" that you don't have to speak German...

  • @themightywookie351c3
    @themightywookie351c3 Рік тому

    Fell asleep……

  • @carstensh.3112
    @carstensh.3112 4 роки тому +4

    Scharnhorst was a a battleship and not a battlecruiser !

    • @bloodrave9578
      @bloodrave9578 4 роки тому

      Technically a Battlecruiser on her speed and guns

    • @listigerfuchs9806
      @listigerfuchs9806 4 роки тому +2

      @@bloodrave9578 but officially she was a battleship that's why she was called schlachtschiff scharnhorst so battleship scharnhorst

    • @benlaskowski357
      @benlaskowski357 4 роки тому +3

      German battlecruisers traded firepower for armor; British ones traded armor for speed. I like calling this ship a battlecruiser, have since I first read about it (I was five), since it fits the German ideal thereof, but if everybody calls it a battleship I won't argue!

    • @raspberryjam8563
      @raspberryjam8563 4 роки тому

      Ben Laskowski nice attitude, I say this because I’ve seen people start ww3 on these sorta things

    • @benlaskowski357
      @benlaskowski357 4 роки тому

      @@raspberryjam8563 Huh?

  • @agemartinussen8141
    @agemartinussen8141 4 роки тому +5

    The Brits would not stand a chance against Germany had`nt it been for the americans:)

    • @KatyushaLauncher
      @KatyushaLauncher 3 роки тому +2

      Lol, I do wonder who was the country that operated from the Atlantic, Pacific, Mediterranean, Norway Sea, Indian Ocean and even in the Australian sea

    • @robertewing3114
      @robertewing3114 3 роки тому

      Roosevelt was given a chance by the UK, and he acknowledged it by telegram to Chamberlain, Good man.

    • @kairopalmer5109
      @kairopalmer5109 3 роки тому +4

      Not true at all. Dalt we would be able to capture France by ourselves and supply Russia at the same time. But Germany could never have invaded UK. There navy was to weak.

    • @Zakalwe-01
      @Zakalwe-01 3 роки тому +2

      Of course. We were totally helpless. That’s why we swatted ALL the German ships that came out of port, or bombed them into oblivion at their moorings, and then sank all their U-Boats.

    • @pablo19136
      @pablo19136 3 роки тому +1

      Very true Äge we would have starved and the RN relocated to Canada. If it wasnt for the Russians we would have lost the war.

  • @NorceCodine
    @NorceCodine 3 роки тому

    Nine British ships against Scharnhorst. It was a fair fight.

    • @TxRattPack
      @TxRattPack 3 роки тому +1

      There were 13 ships vs the Scharnhorst.

    • @michaelhart7569
      @michaelhart7569 3 роки тому +1

      ...and the biggest boy, The Duke of York, didn't actually do anything. It might have contributed some fear, but by this account it was not at all credited with the Scharnhorst's demise. It was the little ships wot dunnit.

    • @reymiguelperez6643
      @reymiguelperez6643 Рік тому

      @michael hart To be fair, HMS Duke of York hit Scharnhost's boiler. Denying the Scharnhorst's chances to escape.