The Problem with 4 Sets (and 2 ways to solve it)

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 4 гру 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 32

  • @avi12
    @avi12 3 роки тому +17

    9:31 Such a wonderful connection between Set Theory and Pascal's Triangle

    • @Ramisa2316
      @Ramisa2316 Рік тому

      shouldn’t the last row be 14441?

  • @talia9018
    @talia9018 4 роки тому +2

    You are a God sent ! Thank you so much for this brilliant justification

  • @dineshmathsclasses2514
    @dineshmathsclasses2514 4 роки тому +4

    Nice way of explaining a relatively difficult concept .Thank you so much for your effort.

  • @dominicyiadom735
    @dominicyiadom735 11 місяців тому +1

    This guy is the second Albert Einstein 😮 I understood as if I just started school, learning my ABC,,,😊 THANK YOU

  • @jaycee9490
    @jaycee9490 6 років тому +26

    "what happens when we do four" *world explodes*

  • @antpop1
    @antpop1 4 роки тому +9

    This didn't help me improve my bench press at all but I am a bit smarter now

  • @JosephSullivan777
    @JosephSullivan777 2 роки тому

    Love your content. You're quite a teacher. Subscribed and looking forward to learning more.
    And, yeah, it's an old video. I guess I wanted to show that I appreciate the effort you've put into this channel over the years.

  • @TisNano
    @TisNano 4 роки тому +5

    Everyone gangsta till a quintuple Venn diagram comes along

  • @thexonexandxonly9144
    @thexonexandxonly9144 2 роки тому +1

    You helped me so much since my school book doesn't give much explanation i come to you and you explain everything perfectly!

  • @jenniferc5944
    @jenniferc5944 4 роки тому +5

    This video saved me. Thank you.

  •  3 роки тому +2

    Connecting Venn diagrams and Pascal's triangle is cool, but there's a much easier way to show why it doubles: For each old region, there is now one with D and one without D, so you double the amount of regions.

  • @vodkastrats
    @vodkastrats 3 роки тому +1

    Not what I was looking for, but I loved the video.

  • @dissuasive5256
    @dissuasive5256 4 роки тому +4

    I wish I have you as my math teacher 😔

  • @khoolimchunkee4673
    @khoolimchunkee4673 6 років тому +1

    Absolutely brilliant

  • @vilmaminicovski5112
    @vilmaminicovski5112 2 роки тому

    Incrível, espetacular e sem mais comentários.

  • @saranont
    @saranont Рік тому

    Why did you put the small whiteboard on the larger whiteboard?

  • @gauravjoshi6725
    @gauravjoshi6725 3 роки тому +2

    O my god it's the Pascal's triangle 😅

  • @brunoherrera2574
    @brunoherrera2574 4 роки тому +2

    I enter here thinking he would talk about workout sets.

  • @jtac8
    @jtac8 6 років тому +1

    What If I have two circles on the diagram and it doesn't have a connection
    A and B are connected but D and C aren't connected

  • @mddjvz
    @mddjvz 3 роки тому +1

    Five?... and further?

  • @karmmark888
    @karmmark888 Рік тому

    Can we go 3d and add another sphere to 3 spheres making a tetrahedral like arrangement. Could that work? Thank you.

  • @calculotv1
    @calculotv1 7 років тому +1

    Excelente.

  • @atc_nth
    @atc_nth 4 роки тому +4

    is there a reason you couldn't just go to the third dimension and have overlapping spheres instead of two-dimensional overlapping circles? or is the goal here to keep everything 2D?

    • @navier668
      @navier668 4 роки тому +3

      averageteencuber have fun drawing that quickly in an exam

    • @keremkelleboz6959
      @keremkelleboz6959 3 роки тому +1

      You can, but the challenge here is to do it 2D. Also the 3D case may be harder. Also also, there no reason not to try this in 4D, 5D and so on. After that most mathematicians will ask which dimension number is the ''best''

  • @KenPlaysYT
    @KenPlaysYT 3 роки тому

    Thank youuuuu

  • @dayandnight5720
    @dayandnight5720 6 років тому

    Thanks

  • @AaVictor
    @AaVictor Рік тому

    OH MY GOD!!!!!!

  • @tutuuo
    @tutuuo 6 років тому +1

    Graciaso Chinito