You are upscaling Midjurney , but taking default from leonardo, u upscale midjerney becouse midjerney default images ratios very small and combined,,why are you compare upscaled Midjerney and Default Leonardo?, u should use upscale lenardo too for correct comparation.
Thanks for your suggestion. We will definitely cover that out.. but for this comparison the output images that you get after writing prompts were compared, no parameters and tweaks whatsoever .. but we will definitely test this out that you’ve suggested
Absolutely right 1. Lenardo on free version 2. Not upscaling lenardo images VS 1. Midjourney on paid version. 2. Upscaled midjourney images. Make fair comparison
If you actually know what you're doing, the difference between the 2 is barely noticeable. After thousands of image generations in each,you can get equivalent results from both. I have dozens of images where the difference is impossible to tell. Bottom line, the technology is advancing so rapidly that it's silly to pick one over the other. Try them all, swap them out. By the time you get hooked on one, another is updating new features.
I love the Leonardo upscaler and use it on all images, even from other AI sources. Every time you compared the two images and said that the Leonardo one had less detail, I was facepalming because you used the Midjourney upscale tool, but not the Leonardo upscale tool. Not a fair comparison at all. Other than that, I appreciate the comparisons. Very nice images!
In Ultra Realism, Stable Diffusion does much better than both together. But at the same time, is harder to get some results without having an ultra-realism-pre-trained model ready to go. And costs are much lower if you choose some Cloud Pc's services, in 'pay as you go' style.
This comparison is so biased. You're comparing the paid version with upscale to the free version without it. Plus, you totally ignored the important aspect of the interface-it's pretty obvious that Leonardo is way ahead in that department.
I would say that the lighting in Leonardo is more real world, whereas the Midjourney lighting has more of a photoshop tweaked magazine look. All depends on which suits your purpose better!
Leonardo AI offers all these features in the first 150 credits for a new signup… Try signing up with your new google account and you’ll be able to access all those features
This video is NOT A FAIR comparison at all @SkillCurb The least you could have done was compare output based on same price. How can you compare a PAID $10 subscription of Midjourney vs FREE Leonard option when they're both offering $10 subscriptions? There are bad ass features the $10 subscription in Leonardo would have unveiled that'd have made this a balanced analysis. Common!! Do a more balanced comparison Anyway, thanks for the effort.
You are upscaling Midjurney , but taking default from leonardo, u upscale midjerney becouse midjerney default images ratios very small and combined,,why are you compare upscaled Midjerney and Default Leonardo?, u should use upscale lenardo too for correct comparation.
Thanks for your suggestion. We will definitely cover that out.. but for this comparison the output images that you get after writing prompts were compared, no parameters and tweaks whatsoever .. but we will definitely test this out that you’ve suggested
Absolutely right 1. Lenardo on free version 2. Not upscaling lenardo images VS 1. Midjourney on paid version. 2. Upscaled midjourney images. Make fair comparison
If you actually know what you're doing, the difference between the 2 is barely noticeable. After thousands of image generations in each,you can get equivalent results from both. I have dozens of images where the difference is impossible to tell. Bottom line, the technology is advancing so rapidly that it's silly to pick one over the other. Try them all, swap them out. By the time you get hooked on one, another is updating new features.
I love the Leonardo upscaler and use it on all images, even from other AI sources. Every time you compared the two images and said that the Leonardo one had less detail, I was facepalming because you used the Midjourney upscale tool, but not the Leonardo upscale tool. Not a fair comparison at all. Other than that, I appreciate the comparisons. Very nice images!
yes, i agree
In Ultra Realism, Stable Diffusion does much better than both together.
But at the same time, is harder to get some results without having an ultra-realism-pre-trained model ready to go.
And costs are much lower if you choose some Cloud Pc's services, in 'pay as you go' style.
This comparison is so biased. You're comparing the paid version with upscale to the free version without it. Plus, you totally ignored the important aspect of the interface-it's pretty obvious that Leonardo is way ahead in that department.
leonardo is great with motion clips if you work around its limitations :-)
I would say that the lighting in Leonardo is more real world, whereas the Midjourney lighting has more of a photoshop tweaked magazine look. All depends on which suits your purpose better!
how are you using leonardo alchemy for free?
Leonardo AI offers all these features in the first 150 credits for a new signup… Try signing up with your new google account and you’ll be able to access all those features
when you use for first time like the first month is for free.
Good job!
This video is NOT A FAIR comparison at all @SkillCurb
The least you could have done was compare output based on same price.
How can you compare a PAID $10 subscription of Midjourney vs FREE Leonard option when they're both offering $10 subscriptions?
There are bad ass features the $10 subscription in Leonardo would have unveiled that'd have made this a balanced analysis.
Common!! Do a more balanced comparison
Anyway, thanks for the effort.