when the Big Bang Theory was proposed, the general consensus still believed in the Bible, so the whole ''Let There Be Light'' fed into the Big Bang Theory and it stuck. from the first Galilean Optical scope at Palomar to the James Webb Observatory, our technology has advanced, our theories of the Universe need to, also.
As clear as the evidence is for stars forming along the Birkland filaments, cosmologists would rather invoke ANY other mechanism than electromagnetic in nature. It will take a highly respected theoretical heavyweight that is too intimidating for the followers to question to change the direction of thought from the exotic, unobservable theories to something simpler that can be understood by people without advanced degrees in mathematics. Job security for the high priests of theoretical physics lies in keeping the theories mystical and obscure to the average student. If science was their first priority, they would do it.
I have heard Anton refuse to use the term Birkland Filaments, as it is defined by EU, and he tries so hard to draw a line in the sand. He says things like magnetic web, magnet bubble, magnetic filaments. He's got some people in his pocket, who are attempting to separate the EU filament from the one they are going to define. His comments always start with some like, "This strange and unknow mystery has scientists hard at work trying to figure out what this is." And then refuses to talk about scientist who already have been pondering the idea for decades.
Bingo. Standard model is crap but scientists are severely dogmatic. They don't like to let go of "established" ideas, regardless of how ridiculous they may be
We could say we know the standard models are false at least. Now this is good support for EU model, but must always keep our minds open and not make the same mistake as they did, which was to stick to one theory only, leading to linear thinking.
damn, such insane detail when including near infrared and the jwst resolution, combined with the familiar hubble type images = just perfect natural reality based art i'd say.. 😍
Big Bang my little pink ..... nose! I would be ecstatic to learn of anything REAL to put that terrible theory where it belongs! Thankyou JWT for just a glimmer of hope. 👻🚀
I though that when the scatter of micro meteors shot it up after the first month or so. "Unpredicted rare event." The thing is screwed up but we working around it.
Scientific discoveries are happening in real time, and being propagated world-wide in real time. So everything we thought we knew is changing in real time. This fact should probably discourage anyone from drawing conclusions and focus on discovery.
@@wesbaumguardner8829 if you are replying to me you have misconstrued my point. I am a fan of Halton Arps work, and he is for me the best example of new paradigm suppression within the astronomy mainstream.
What we will see going forward and looking deeper into the universe is more of the same galaxies. Everywhere we have looked, and at every increase of magnification we have seen more distant galaxies. The result will be (and has been) that Cosmology moving the goal post and the age of the universe back further to reconcile their failed hypothesis (aka the big bang theory). In reality, its a dirty dirty universe (this is the second law of thermodynamics in action: a tendency toward maximum entropy) filled with intergalactic dust that blocks and/or diminishes the light from the most distant galaxies. Our local cluster of the Milkyway has been said to be traveling through a particularly dusty region of the galaxy, but this is not the whole truth. When examined holistically, that dusty region isn't merely terrain on our path, its an intrinsic part of our arm of the galaxy (literally the underlying scaffolding that holds the entire arm together).
Getting really tired of this attitude that only those with a PhD in physics may have an opinion on our universe. Most especially as we are told of an increasing number of "invisible" explanations like black holes dark energy dark matter anti matter ***spooky woo woo noises***
Great work - hopefully we can start building a new and comprehensive cosmology on sound foundations again, soon. And at least, remove the big embarrassment to science which is the ΛCDM.
Perhaps stars in a galaxy rotate in many sub cycles (smaller clusters that rotate quicker with respect to the overal galaxy rotation), where the total galaxy rotation is just the biggest one. If so, then a galaxy changes in appearance slowly, sometimes it is like a disk with evenly distributed stars, sometimes showing clear spiral arms. I don't know if this idea is correct, but it seems logical.
I have a question. Since galaxies travel in space time as they cross the universe, emitting light along the way, then we should be able to observe the same galaxy at different places in the sky, different places in the life of the galaxy and universe, by figuring out the direction of the galaxy and its speed, then mapping the universe forward and backward in spacetime and making observations there. IN OTHER WORDS, as an example, If Galaxy A is observed to be 1 billion light years away when the telescope aims at in say in Andromeda, and we could extrapolate or guess which way it came and/or which way it is going then we could find it elsewhere in the sky, say at 2 billion years ago, and half a billion years ago. WHERE IS THIS WRONG? It would make the Universe smaller and with 'less' galaxies than we have presumed. Looking at the same question from a different hypothesis. Say the universe rotates about an axis, meaning galctic clusters rotate around a (galactic center or gravitational center), then like looking through a revolving merry go round (through a kaleidoscope, lol) we actually see the same galaxies in different “places” in our “night sky”. The rotation could be more of a galactic tug of war compared to the metronome of our solar system so the riders on the merry go round get to change to adjacent horses in between coming into our view.
One of those examples of "I just know it's right!", literally, is the self-defining explanation of Virtual Work taught in Engineering 101, it is exactly what e-Pi-i sync-duration connectivity function is in Fluxion-Integral flash-fractal recognition of an Absolute Zero-infinity entangled truth without words implies. So when you realise how static mechanics of relative-timing ratio-rates Perspective Principle represents the potential "lawful statement" of AM-FM time-timing Actuality, winding Mathematical Measurement Disproof Methodologies back by reversed logic of QM-TIME Completeness Quantum Operator Logic potential Reciprocation-Resonance Oscillation.., the resulting picture is of a Virtual Work power source, ie the operator e-Pi-i 1-0-infinity instantaneous trancendental i-reflection sync-duration existence frozen phase-locked coherence-cohesion objective-aspects of ONE-INFINITY Singularity. Ie probability ONE-INFINITY Singularity Correspondence in Principle, vanishing-into-no-thing. What an awesome video report! Only concept to be integrated is the re-evolution circularity quantization cause-effect of probabilistic wave-particle packaging of log-antilog Condensate = statements as prime-cofactor frequency resonances. (Wow, JWT sees Sublimation-Tunnelling parallel linear-scalar coexistence 0-1-2-ness dimensionality)
@@cynicalskeptic stable diffusion. It has taken a little bit of time to wrap my head around how it works. Some of the images in the previous video I did which were images of Einstein and Newton were also created using it.
They always say that the superdense universe was extremely hot, but this does not make sense to me. In order for the matter to be condensed below the wavelength of a photon, it would be cold, not hot. Thus, after seeing a video title analyzing superconductors, I had an idea: I propose that the universe sublimated into existence really fast. Here's how: As the surface layers sublimated, the expansion heated up and then sent energy back toward the singularity, increasing the speed of sublimation untill it created the effects described in the big bang model. Here is where superconductors come in. As the energy was released in the outer edges, its electrons flowed back through to enhance chemical reactions, producing the fireball that we call the big bang, but much slower than has been assumed. The slower, but greater reactions (due to great releases of electron flow) would allow these fledgling galaxies to form almost immediately. The huge differences in temperatures present would allow the galaxies to swirl and combine sooner than later and in much greater numbers. As the galaxies coalesce, they heat up, rather than cool down. We see that heating up in the red spectrum, since they do not yet have the energy for the ultraviolet spectrum that would hide them from JWST.
@@wesbaumguardner8829 Nobody likes a nitpicker that doesn't know how to interpret imperfect, but easily understood phrasing. I don't need a personal editor.
@@Dismythed I was not editing you. I was pointing out a flaw in your logic. It is the same flaw in logic that the mainstream "scientists" have. The universe cannot have a beginning because change requires time and time is a property of the universe. To say that the universe had a beginning is to say that time itself had a beginning, but for time to have a beginning would mean that time itself would have had to occur before time itself actually could occur which is a circular reference fallacy. Also, I do not give a damn if you or anyone else likes me.
Someone posted a comment that I reported because I thought he was just randomly advertising a channel (Fractal Girl). I now know he meant to guide me to her "My Ether Model" video which discusses a Bose-Einstein Condensate before the big bang. Though I do not necessarily agree with where she goes from there. The fact is, BEC only affects bosons (e.g. photons), not fermions (electrons) or hadrons (protons). In order to have that state of matter, you need many particles that already exist. Together they create a larger particle with spin 0 just as quarks work together to make protons and neutrons. The smaller particles do not lose their identity within the larger particle as she seems to assume. They simply act together as one. However, as soon as they heat up, they separate. Now here is the real problem with her model besides her assumption about particles losing identity. She assumes that the circular motion of particles comes from the vortices created by the evaporating condensate. If that were where their spin comes from, then it would quickly dissipate as it gets lost in competition with other vortices and cools off as it moves away from the hyperactivity. Besides this, she seems to confuse spin for the spiral movement of particles. The spiral pattern of forward movement needs to be intrinsic to the particle's existence. It cannot be caused by the motion of other particles or vortices in an ether.
The super massive black holes is what they are going to go for, isn't it? Solves all problems. Wish I had one in my life, it's be such a good solution to all those little annoying things
Big bang shown to be nonsense again. I highly recommend the book The Matter with Things by Ian McGilchrist to understand the people who invented that idea
These galaxies are the oldest of the original primordial galaxies that didn't go (super)nova and start the rest of the second, third, etc galaxies and higher periodic table of elements from thermonuclear fusions. These are further proofs that the background microwave radiation is NOT the primordial remnants of the original universal matter - but this is (from any viewpoint across the cosmos) it is the very aether and reactive quantum foam between the dark energies and forces and that of the physical universe.
Why would you say something that exists shouldn't? Physics works. Physists are the variable. One minute, they don't know why gravity is so weak. Now it's a sinkhole in space? Contradiction of physical properties? You can't see light in space. Heat can be felt, and you can see its effect in a mass. Shimmering heat waves. Pressure of force. Heat waves in space are not visible but their effects are. Light is absorbed as heat. Light is heat in resistance to atmospheres. Distance is reduced by resistance. Physics works. Gravity doesn't. Vibrations settle into the weakest point of resistance. Magnetic fields of greater mass are weaker than micro magnetic fields. Greater magnetic fields control the alignment of smaller magnetic fields to unification unidirectional flow cycling towards the weakest point of resistance. Earth is our greatest mass of neutralized weakest resistance. We vibrate towards it in unification of flow.
You unsubbed from a channel in which you fundamentally disagree with the main thesis of its content? Why would you subscribe to a channel that only covers topics that you believe are wrong? Your comment is so transparently disingenuous and your grammar is atrocious. You barely have a grasp of basic linguistic skills and you're lecturing PHD Scientists on astrophysics. The irony is kind of hilarious.
As Wal Thornhill predicted, when asked what the JWT would reveal - "Filaments everywhere."
when the Big Bang Theory was proposed, the general consensus still believed in the Bible, so the whole ''Let There Be Light'' fed into the Big Bang Theory and it stuck. from the first Galilean Optical scope at Palomar to the James Webb Observatory, our technology has advanced, our theories of the Universe need to, also.
As clear as the evidence is for stars forming along the Birkland filaments, cosmologists would rather invoke ANY other mechanism than electromagnetic in nature.
It will take a highly respected theoretical heavyweight that is too intimidating for the followers to question to change the direction of thought from the exotic, unobservable theories to something simpler that can be understood by people without advanced degrees in mathematics. Job security for the high priests of theoretical physics lies in keeping the theories mystical and obscure to the average student. If science was their first priority, they would do it.
I have heard Anton refuse to use the term Birkland Filaments, as it is defined by EU, and he tries so hard to draw a line in the sand. He says things like magnetic web, magnet bubble, magnetic filaments. He's got some people in his pocket, who are attempting to separate the EU filament from the one they are going to define. His comments always start with some like, "This strange and unknow mystery has scientists hard at work trying to figure out what this is." And then refuses to talk about scientist who already have been pondering the idea for decades.
Technically, the discoveries do not break the universe, they just break the present erroneous standard model.
💥🤯 Spot on
They expand the universe.
Well said.
Bingo. Standard model is crap but scientists are severely dogmatic. They don't like to let go of "established" ideas, regardless of how ridiculous they may be
Agreed and even the advanced JWST does not “see” all there is out there. Open eyes and open minds come here to learn. See The Pattern rocks!
Electric Universe theories further vindicated, I'd say.
Yes, Birkeland currents showing up😉👍
We could say we know the standard models are false at least. Now this is good support for EU model, but must always keep our minds open and not make the same mistake as they did, which was to stick to one theory only, leading to linear thinking.
4:04 Eric Lerner was first discovered by me during my college years when his book “The Bog Bang Never Happened” could be found at Borders Books.
Borders Books has unfortunately gone where the Big Bang should've gone instead.
This again shows that red shift does not equal recessional velocity.
damn, such insane detail when including near infrared and the jwst resolution, combined with the familiar hubble type images = just perfect natural reality based art i'd say.. 😍
Our door of the new Paradigm is opening to show all! Thanks Gareth for all you hard indepth work. You are a major credit to the Electric Universe!
A thousand new questions.
Very Excellent!! Thank you again for an information packed but concise video.
Curiouser and curiouser.....
Tks from Brazil.
Big Bang my little pink ..... nose! I would be ecstatic to learn of anything REAL to put that terrible theory where it belongs! Thankyou JWT for just a glimmer of hope. 👻🚀
They more interested in a theory than actual observations. Very linear thinking that they cannot further science without this one theory!
@@Bobany Couldn't agree more! Thanks for dropping in. Cya! 🚀
Great Channel. Are you in touch with the Thunderbolts Channel by any chance? Society for Interdisciplinary Studies?
Yes I produce some of the videos on the Thunderbolts channel
@@SeethePattern Cool beans. So you are on Intersect. I didn't recognize you. Duh on me.
You'll know the JWT was getting too close to paradigm busting when it has an unfortunate disastrous and debilitating mishap.
I though that when the scatter of micro meteors shot it up after the first month or so. "Unpredicted rare event." The thing is screwed up but we working around it.
I’ve come to the realization that galaxies are not giant groups of stars. And something else entirely
Amazing
Always interesting, keep up the good work. Cheers.
_As above, so below..._
Good on ya m8!
Keep it up!
They are just super duper black holes surrounded by super duper amounts of stars, with extra duperist superist amounts of the darkiest of dark energy.
They also to discover dark matter to dark matter to explain the normal dark matter's structure. Science knows no bounds!
Next week I will probably be prepared to accept that up is down, black is white, and Hollywood make good movies!
It could tell us the foundation of the big bang theory has been CRUSHED. And the Electric Universe Theory was right, once again.
Thank you.
Hmm. maybe...maybe... Big Bang never happend, ups.
Scientific discoveries are happening in real time, and being propagated world-wide in real time. So everything we thought we knew is changing in real time. This fact should probably discourage anyone from drawing conclusions and focus on discovery.
Yes but as always the mainstream and it’s associated funding and control of peer review works as a gatekeeper to suppress any new paradigms.
So we should just pile all of the discoveries in the basement and not think critically about them at all until we stop discovering?
@@wesbaumguardner8829 if you are replying to me you have misconstrued my point. I am a fan of Halton Arps work, and he is for me the best example of new paradigm suppression within the astronomy mainstream.
@@skipintroux4444 I was replying to the original poster and am unable to see your prior response at all.
@@wesbaumguardner8829 thanks for the tag :)
hi! How can I contact you by email? I would like to share with you my theory.
Many thanks 👍👍🙏🙏
What we will see going forward and looking deeper into the universe is more of the same galaxies. Everywhere we have looked, and at every increase of magnification we have seen more distant galaxies.
The result will be (and has been) that Cosmology moving the goal post and the age of the universe back further to reconcile their failed hypothesis (aka the big bang theory).
In reality, its a dirty dirty universe (this is the second law of thermodynamics in action: a tendency toward maximum entropy) filled with intergalactic dust that blocks and/or diminishes the light from the most distant galaxies.
Our local cluster of the Milkyway has been said to be traveling through a particularly dusty region of the galaxy, but this is not the whole truth. When examined holistically, that dusty region isn't merely terrain on our path, its an intrinsic part of our arm of the galaxy (literally the underlying scaffolding that holds the entire arm together).
They truly are a new wonder.
Getting really tired of this attitude that only those with a PhD in physics may have an opinion on our universe. Most especially as we are told of an increasing number of "invisible" explanations like black holes dark energy dark matter anti matter ***spooky woo woo noises***
Especially since the foundations of most physics knowledge was not discovered, nor written by, anyone with a PhD.
Then whatever said it shouldn't exist would be wrong.
Beautiful comparison!
The world will shift because of JWST
Thank you Gareth for the amazing work.
Great work - hopefully we can start building a new and comprehensive cosmology on sound foundations again, soon. And at least, remove the big embarrassment to science which is the ΛCDM.
Haha, that sidestepping phrase "just intrinsically red" . . . Now that's Science! Yeh . . ahem n'kay riiiight . . .
Perhaps stars in a galaxy rotate in many sub cycles (smaller clusters that rotate quicker with respect to the overal galaxy rotation), where the total galaxy rotation is just the biggest one. If so, then a galaxy changes in appearance slowly, sometimes it is like a disk with evenly distributed stars, sometimes showing clear spiral arms. I don't know if this idea is correct, but it seems logical.
I have a question. Since galaxies travel in space time as they cross the universe, emitting light along the way, then we should be able to observe the same galaxy at different places in the sky, different places in the life of the galaxy and universe, by figuring out the direction of the galaxy and its speed, then mapping the universe forward and backward in spacetime and making observations there. IN OTHER WORDS, as an example, If Galaxy A is observed to be 1 billion light years away when the telescope aims at in say in Andromeda, and we could extrapolate or guess which way it came and/or which way it is going then we could find it elsewhere in the sky, say at 2 billion years ago, and half a billion years ago. WHERE IS THIS WRONG? It would make the Universe smaller and with 'less' galaxies than we have presumed.
Looking at the same question from a different hypothesis. Say the universe rotates about an axis, meaning galctic clusters rotate around a (galactic center or gravitational center), then like looking through a revolving merry go round (through a kaleidoscope, lol) we actually see the same galaxies in different “places” in our “night sky”. The rotation could be more of a galactic tug of war compared to the metronome of our solar system so the riders on the merry go round get to change to adjacent horses in between coming into our view.
One of those examples of "I just know it's right!", literally, is the self-defining explanation of Virtual Work taught in Engineering 101, it is exactly what e-Pi-i sync-duration connectivity function is in Fluxion-Integral flash-fractal recognition of an Absolute Zero-infinity entangled truth without words implies.
So when you realise how static mechanics of relative-timing ratio-rates Perspective Principle represents the potential "lawful statement" of AM-FM time-timing Actuality, winding Mathematical Measurement Disproof Methodologies back by reversed logic of QM-TIME Completeness Quantum Operator Logic potential Reciprocation-Resonance Oscillation.., the resulting picture is of a Virtual Work power source, ie the operator e-Pi-i 1-0-infinity instantaneous trancendental i-reflection sync-duration existence frozen phase-locked coherence-cohesion objective-aspects of ONE-INFINITY Singularity.
Ie probability ONE-INFINITY Singularity Correspondence in Principle, vanishing-into-no-thing.
What an awesome video report!
Only concept to be integrated is the re-evolution circularity quantization cause-effect of probabilistic wave-particle packaging of log-antilog Condensate = statements as prime-cofactor frequency resonances. (Wow, JWT sees Sublimation-Tunnelling parallel linear-scalar coexistence 0-1-2-ness dimensionality)
Well someone has been having too much fun lately with an AI image generator! 😁
Yup
@@SeethePattern which one did you use, if I may ask? 👀
@@cynicalskeptic stable diffusion. It has taken a little bit of time to wrap my head around how it works. Some of the images in the previous video I did which were images of Einstein and Newton were also created using it.
They always say that the superdense universe was extremely hot, but this does not make sense to me. In order for the matter to be condensed below the wavelength of a photon, it would be cold, not hot. Thus, after seeing a video title analyzing superconductors, I had an idea:
I propose that the universe sublimated into existence really fast. Here's how:
As the surface layers sublimated, the expansion heated up and then sent energy back toward the singularity, increasing the speed of sublimation untill it created the effects described in the big bang model.
Here is where superconductors come in. As the energy was released in the outer edges, its electrons flowed back through to enhance chemical reactions, producing the fireball that we call the big bang, but much slower than has been assumed. The slower, but greater reactions (due to great releases of electron flow) would allow these fledgling galaxies to form almost immediately.
The huge differences in temperatures present would allow the galaxies to swirl and combine sooner than later and in much greater numbers. As the galaxies coalesce, they heat up, rather than cool down. We see that heating up in the red spectrum, since they do not yet have the energy for the ultraviolet spectrum that would hide them from JWST.
"I propose that the universe sublimated into existence really fast." The universe is existence. How did it sublimate into itself?.
@@wesbaumguardner8829 Nobody likes a nitpicker that doesn't know how to interpret imperfect, but easily understood phrasing. I don't need a personal editor.
@@Dismythed I was not editing you. I was pointing out a flaw in your logic. It is the same flaw in logic that the mainstream "scientists" have. The universe cannot have a beginning because change requires time and time is a property of the universe. To say that the universe had a beginning is to say that time itself had a beginning, but for time to have a beginning would mean that time itself would have had to occur before time itself actually could occur which is a circular reference fallacy. Also, I do not give a damn if you or anyone else likes me.
Next. 😒
Someone posted a comment that I reported because I thought he was just randomly advertising a channel (Fractal Girl). I now know he meant to guide me to her "My Ether Model" video which discusses a Bose-Einstein Condensate before the big bang. Though I do not necessarily agree with where she goes from there. The fact is, BEC only affects bosons (e.g. photons), not fermions (electrons) or hadrons (protons).
In order to have that state of matter, you need many particles that already exist. Together they create a larger particle with spin 0 just as quarks work together to make protons and neutrons.
The smaller particles do not lose their identity within the larger particle as she seems to assume. They simply act together as one. However, as soon as they heat up, they separate.
Now here is the real problem with her model besides her assumption about particles losing identity. She assumes that the circular motion of particles comes from the vortices created by the evaporating condensate. If that were where their spin comes from, then it would quickly dissipate as it gets lost in competition with other vortices and cools off as it moves away from the hyperactivity.
Besides this, she seems to confuse spin for the spiral movement of particles. The spiral pattern of forward movement needs to be intrinsic to the particle's existence. It cannot be caused by the motion of other particles or vortices in an ether.
The super massive black holes is what they are going to go for, isn't it? Solves all problems. Wish I had one in my life, it's be such a good solution to all those little annoying things
I believe Sound Garden wrote a song about this. (lol)
Big bang shown to be nonsense again. I highly recommend the book The Matter with Things by Ian McGilchrist to understand the people who invented that idea
Universe is a huge matrix and all matter are discrete machines. And that can be shown.
gareth you are looking like a chad in the thumbmail
7:40, the fossilized chambers of a nautilus shell.
These galaxies are the oldest of the original primordial galaxies that didn't go (super)nova and start the rest of the second, third, etc galaxies and higher periodic table of elements from thermonuclear fusions. These are further proofs that the background microwave radiation is NOT the primordial remnants of the original universal matter - but this is (from any viewpoint across the cosmos) it is the very aether and reactive quantum foam between the dark energies and forces and that of the physical universe.
the filaments are also part of the many Birkeland currents and other pathways of energies and forces that flow across the cosmos.
Scientists again baffled... lol
That's a lot to infer from 100 pixels.
Sorry, keine Überraschung jederzeit 😂
No matter what those galaxies are made of, they are just so beautiful to look at.
so is the Milky Way spinning clockwise or counter?
more cosmic psychobabble
"There is something fascinating about science. One gets such wholesale returns of conjecture out of such a trifling investment of fact."
and maybe... there wasn't Big Bang at all???.... 😀
Hoyle is lol.
Why would you say something that exists shouldn't? Physics works. Physists are the variable. One minute, they don't know why gravity is so weak. Now it's a sinkhole in space? Contradiction of physical properties? You can't see light in space. Heat can be felt, and you can see its effect in a mass. Shimmering heat waves. Pressure of force. Heat waves in space are not visible but their effects are. Light is absorbed as heat. Light is heat in resistance to atmospheres. Distance is reduced by resistance. Physics works. Gravity doesn't. Vibrations settle into the weakest point of resistance. Magnetic fields of greater mass are weaker than micro magnetic fields. Greater magnetic fields control the alignment of smaller magnetic fields to unification unidirectional flow cycling towards the weakest point of resistance. Earth is our greatest mass of neutralized weakest resistance. We vibrate towards it in unification of flow.
And they have not yet even explained inter-galactic filaments. The standard interpretation is dead.
Love your posts but HELL NO to supporting A.I. Generated Art.
Don’t you see the need to show people why it is a more powerful statement in doing something with our hands…
Will you PLEASE stop using google translate, the title and description is complete gibberish.
Еven citing Eric Lerner , the proven science charlatan. My goodness
Unsubsribed. This was ur 5th video i saw that has desinformation in it.
This is the 1st time I noticed your comment had 4 spelling error in it.
You unsubbed from a channel in which you fundamentally disagree with the main thesis of its content? Why would you subscribe to a channel that only covers topics that you believe are wrong? Your comment is so transparently disingenuous and your grammar is atrocious. You barely have a grasp of basic linguistic skills and you're lecturing PHD Scientists on astrophysics. The irony is kind of hilarious.