Dumbledore is assuming facts not in evidence yet lack the truth. Dumbledore had the answer to the vexing question: "Who betrayed James, and Lily?" Snape knew, and could answer the question.
Dumbledore only exacerbate the situation by acting without any proof that Sirius commited the crime, only an assumption. Nice, not even close to reasonable suspicion just a hunch. Reverting back to the use of a Star Chamber. Frank ask a critcal question to Dumbledore with Dumbledore response being " I was not present when the Fidelis was cast." Back to a hunch.
Due to Dumbledore indifference, he defamed both Sirius, and Remus by causing the duo to accused of kidnapping Harry, and betraying James, and Lily. The defense to defmation per se is the truth.
Dumbledore is assuming facts not in evidence yet lack the truth. Dumbledore had the answer to the vexing question: "Who betrayed James, and Lily?" Snape knew, and could answer the question.
Dumbledore only exacerbate the situation by acting without any proof that Sirius commited the crime, only an assumption. Nice, not even close to reasonable suspicion just a hunch. Reverting back to the use of a Star Chamber.
Frank ask a critcal question to Dumbledore with Dumbledore response being " I was not present when the Fidelis was cast." Back to a hunch.
Due to Dumbledore indifference, he defamed both Sirius, and Remus by causing the duo to accused of kidnapping Harry, and betraying James, and Lily.
The defense to defmation per se is the truth.
Ron should be resorted to Slytherin, his conduct has malefic intent towards Harry based upon an assumption with no proof.