Why Didn't History Record The "Rapture" In 66-70 AD? Pt 6

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 21 січ 2025

КОМЕНТАРІ • 203

  • @BecamePneuma
    @BecamePneuma 15 днів тому +2

    Those who truly believe in the significance of 70 AD and its purpose for knowing the rest of the Bible (Old and New Covenant) is so incredibly small. Thank God for giving us truth and wisdom! God Bless

    • @appointedaday
      @appointedaday 6 днів тому

      When did And the kings of the earth, the great men, the rich men, the commanders hid in caves telling the rocks to fall on them and hide them from Him who sits on the throne and from the wrath of the Lamb?

  • @deanfloyd8931
    @deanfloyd8931 16 днів тому +5

    If we're ever going to see the kingdom of God, it only happens thru the eyes of faith.

    • @MasonHarrison-t3n
      @MasonHarrison-t3n 12 днів тому

      Agreed., but tribulation has not taken place. If it had, then there would be an account of it in the bible as if it would have happened. It just common sense. Jesus account was very detailed and many things recorded.A full blown tribulation not recorded in the bible in 70 ad and it did not make the bible cut...Ludicrous. The bible talks about these things to come. God is all knowing and sovereign and he would have orchestrated the account of the tribulation in the bible if it had occurred.

    • @deanfloyd8931
      @deanfloyd8931 12 днів тому

      @MasonHarrison-t3n It's easy to say that, as we didn't experiencing the hellish conditions from a three and a half year Roman seige.

  • @BecamePneuma
    @BecamePneuma 15 днів тому +3

    I’d like to hear your thoughts on the 1000 year reign verse (Rev 20:4-6). I believe this is symbolic for the time we live in now and that those in the first century who were sealed are living and reigning with Christ now, as does Christ live and reign with those still alive in the flesh today (and everyday since 70 AD and into the future for as long as this earth remains). God Bless

    • @lindakerr9283
      @lindakerr9283 15 днів тому +2

      Pastor Gallagher has a 4 part series on “The Millennium of Rev. 20”. Go to Clayville Assembly. Search Sermons. God Bless your studies.

    • @BecamePneuma
      @BecamePneuma 15 днів тому

      @ Thanks!

  • @donnajagers4081
    @donnajagers4081 14 днів тому +1

    Matthew 24:14
    And this gospel of the Kingdom shall be preached in all the world for a witness unto all nations, and then shall the end come.
    Question: If all the witnesses of the good news of the kingdom were removed from this earth around 70 AD how could the good news be spread to all the nations?

    • @DannyFesperman
      @DannyFesperman 13 днів тому

      The context is the nations of the diaspora.

    • @777Fearnot
      @777Fearnot 10 днів тому

      Act’s chapter 2 this was fulfilled!

  • @derrickalexander458
    @derrickalexander458 16 днів тому +2

    Love the beginning rant hahaha!!

  • @mytwocents777
    @mytwocents777 15 днів тому +4

    Paul wrote in 51-52 A.D. that Christ would not come to gather the saints any time prior to the apostasy and the man of lawlessness being revealed. No notable Christian apostasy occurred and no man of lawlessness was revealed by 66-70 A.D.

    • @DannyFesperman
      @DannyFesperman 14 днів тому +1

      Now that's funny right there. You must have skipped history class that day. And you must not read the Bible much.

    • @BecamePneuma
      @BecamePneuma 14 днів тому +3

      Nero.

    • @mytwocents777
      @mytwocents777 14 днів тому

      @@BecamePneuma Nero was the initiator of the first of the historically-recognized ten general persecutions of Christians carried out by Roman emperors.
      Nero's formal, organized persecution constituted _the beginning_ of the paradigm of great tribulation that Jesus foretold, in Matthew 24, Mark 13 and Luke 21, would exist by the time that Jerusalem would be surrounded by armies and that would continue until immediately prior to his return to gather the elect.
      History has proven Jesus' forecast to have been accurate, as Nero began that first general persecution just prior to the siege of Jerusalem. Moreover, persecutions of Christians have continued to the present day, being carried out by agents of the mystery of iniquity under various names, including the Roman Papacy, Islam and Marxism.
      *Nero, however, was not the man of lawlessness* . To believe that he was is to disregard scripture's characterization of that "man".
      Firstly, Christians understand the man of lawlessness and the antichrist to be the same entity.
      Secondly, there are numerous passages in the New Testament which make clear that the man of lawlessness, the final antichrist, would be an _apostate Christian ecclesiastical leader_ ; not a pagan tyrant. Two of these are the following:
      2 Thessalonians 2 informs us that he would be enthroned in the midst of the Christian populace (i.e., which is repeatedly defined in scripture as the temple of God in the Christian era), exhibiting himself as though he were God.
      1 John 2:18-19 informs us that the singular antichrist who was coming would arise _according to the manner in which_ [ _καθὼς_ ] many antichrists had already emerged by John's time of writing: via apostasy from among Christianity.

    • @mytwocents777
      @mytwocents777 14 днів тому

      @@DannyFesperman 1 John 2:18-19, in which John describes a singular _coming antichrist_ as one who would arise in the same way that many antichrists had already arisen (by apostasy from within the Christian populace; _not out of Paganism_ ), is acknowledged by scholars to have been written between 80 and 95 A.D.
      A careful study of scripture, history _and mathematics_ is helpful for understanding that the antichrist could not have emerged by 70 A.D.

    • @mytwocents777
      @mytwocents777 14 днів тому

      Nero was the initiator of the first of the historically-recognized ten general persecutions of Christians carried out by Roman emperors.
      Nero's formal, organized persecution constituted _the beginning_ of the paradigm of great tribulation that Jesus foretold, in Matthew 24, Mark 13 and Luke 21, would exist by the time that Jerusalem would be surrounded by armies and that would continue until immediately prior to his return to gather the elect.
      History has proven Jesus' forecast to have been accurate, as Nero began that first general persecution just prior to the siege of Jerusalem. Moreover, persecutions of Christians have continued to the present day, being carried out by agents of the mystery of iniquity under various names, including the Roman Papacy, Islam and Marxism.
      *Nero, however, was not the man of lawlessness* . To believe that he was is to disregard scripture's characterization of that "man".
      Firstly, Christians understand the man of lawlessness and the antichrist to be the same entity.
      Secondly, there are numerous passages in the New Testament which make clear that the man of lawlessness, the final antichrist, would be an _apostate Christian ecclesiastical leader_ ; not a pagan tyrant. Two of these are the following:
      2 Thessalonians 2 informs us that he would be enthroned in the midst of the Christian populace (i.e., which is repeatedly defined in scripture as the temple of God in the Christian era), exhibiting himself as though he were God.
      1 John 2:18-19 informs us that the singular antichrist who was coming would arise _according to the manner in which_ [ _καθὼς_ ] many antichrists had already emerged by John's time of writing: via apostasy from among Christianity. John wrote that some time between 80-95 A.D. Nero was already dead in 68 A.D.

  • @garycarlton3877
    @garycarlton3877 16 днів тому +2

    Commendable, Great Awesome!

  • @barbaraferron7994
    @barbaraferron7994 15 днів тому +3

    If all the true believers were raptured in 70 AD. Then how could Christianity have grown? There wouldn't be any true believers left to evangelize to people.

    • @gregmcauley2919
      @gregmcauley2919 15 днів тому

      Intriguing question. Would be interested in a discussion on this point.

    • @DannyFesperman
      @DannyFesperman 14 днів тому +1

      Two things.
      1. That's why Jesus emphasized the great commission before he left, and why Paul said that the gospel had been preached everywhere.
      2. The Bible was completed, collected, and canonized by 64AD. Jesus prayed in John 17 for everyone who would believe on him through the apostles' word. That's what everyone since then has done to be saved.

  • @MrCoolahhead
    @MrCoolahhead 16 днів тому

    I'm tracking with everything so far.
    At some point will you speak about what portions of eschatological scripture if any apply to us today?

    • @DannyFesperman
      @DannyFesperman 16 днів тому +3

      There is nothing unfulfilled. We are living in the new covenant gospel age of Rev 21 and 22.

  • @soteriology400
    @soteriology400 16 днів тому +1

    Josephus caught them fleeing on April 10, AD70. The next day began the 1260 days of revelation 12:6. This was the fulfillment when the “two sticks” became one of Ezekiel 37. This was also the fulfillment of the “time, times and half a time” which applied to their Yom Teruah. The 1260 days ended perfectly to the “half a time” which was day 5 out of 10 of the 10 day feast of their last Yom Teruah. This ended up being September 22, AD73. This was their last day and was the day 1 Thessalonians 4:16 was fulfilled.

    • @DannyFesperman
      @DannyFesperman 16 днів тому

      You are way off. The 3.5 years was 66-70AD.

    • @soteriology400
      @soteriology400 16 днів тому

      @@DannyFesperman There are numerous prophecies that were fulfilled, which one were you referring too?
      These are the dates I came up with;
      9 Prophecies fulfilled in the first century (what days did they occur?).
      1.` Revelation 12:14
      2. Daniel 12:7
      3. Daniel 12:11-13
      4. Revelation 11:2
      5. Revelation 11:3
      6. Revelation 11:9-11
      7. Revelation 12:6
      8. Revelation 13:5
      9. Daniel 7:25
      1. Time: September 3 thru September 12, AD69. Times: August 15 thru August 24 AD68, August 28 thru September 6, AD67. Half a time: September 6 thru September 11, AD66.
      2. Time: September 22 AD70 thru October 1, AD70. Times: September 12 thru September 21 AD71, August 30 thru September 8 AD72, half a time: September 18 thru September 22 AD73
      3. 1290 days: August 15, AD66 to February 25, AD70. 1335 days: August 15, AD66 to April 10, AD70.
      4. February AD67 to August 31, AD70.
      5. October 30, AD66 to April 11, AD70.
      6. April 11 to April 15, AD70. Exactly 40 years to the day after Jesus’ death, burial, resurrection, and discovery of empty tomb in the Hebraic calendar.
      7. April 11, AD70 thru September 22, AD73.
      8. November AD64 thru June 8, AD68.
      9. Time: Tishri 1-10 AD64, Times: Tishri 1-10 AD65 & AD66, Half a time: Tishri 5, AD67 or September 30, AD67.
      I have back checked this, using software to verify travel times (by foot and by boat, depending on where from and where they were going) etc. It all worked out perfectly.
      You must think Josephus is not a reliable eyewitness based on your response?

    • @DannyFesperman
      @DannyFesperman 16 днів тому

      @soteriology400 Great tribulation was 64-66AD. Wrath of God on Jerusalem was 66-70AD. Christ's appearing and the resurrection occurred between those two.
      Matt 24:29. Immediately after the tribulation of those days shall the sun be darkened, and the moon shall not give her light, and the stars shall fall from heaven, and the powers of the heavens shall be shaken:
      30 And then shall appear the sign of the Son of man in heaven: and then shall all the tribes of the earth mourn, and they shall see the Son of man coming in the clouds of heaven with power and great glory.
      31. And he shall send his angels with a great sound of a trumpet, and they shall gather together his elect from the four winds, from one end of heaven to the other.

    • @rm19660
      @rm19660 15 днів тому

      Christ has already had the thousand year reign? And a thousand years ago was the great white throne judgment. So the city has come down from God in heaven and this is now the new Earth?

    • @soteriology400
      @soteriology400 15 днів тому

      @@rm19660 Have you looked at the Old Testament and observed how "a thousand" was used in every instance?

  • @CarmineFragione-u1t
    @CarmineFragione-u1t 15 днів тому +3

    There is an element of mystery, no one seems to want to talk about . But the Judaism Jews of today have no idea whatever became of the Sadducee Jews who were the Sons of Zadok, being of the House of Phinehas, of Aaron to whom God said to these priests , "You have no share in Israel, You are mine, Myself, I AM YOUR SHARE". So in Moses Law, Moses said the Priests could not own the land of Israel and could not inherit the wealth of the land of Israel, though they were given houses to live in freely, that the Sole Inheritance of the Devout Priest is GOD HIMSELF. That means God is being used as a TITLE to reward the Priest who is devout and of the Korbanot Temple Israel services, including Passover, that such a Priest, like Jesus was, who dies as a devout priest, making himself a Propitiation for Sin , and dying, then being that there is really such a GOD OFHEAVEN ABOVE, outside of Time and Space, an ETERNAL MATTER that rules, such authority as a SPIRIT OF GOD raised the Priest who died , and he rises up to receive his reward, then Jesus INHERITED TITLE of GOD HIMSELF. That is the legal wrangle of Moses Law based on what God said to Aaron , the Priest is not able to own land or inherit the land, he can only die and rise to inherit GOD HIMSELF, as God said to Aaron "I AM YOUR SHARE". So the Sons of Zadok who were the Sadducee Priests of Temple Israel , two thousand years ago, virtually DISAPPEARED from the EARTH and from all History that there is this CLOUD OF MYSTERY, and the Jews of Judaism , they are not Temple Israel and they have no idea whatever happened to the legitimate Priests, including Jesus, that it seems a RAPTURE of the SAINTS did happen in that time, 70 A.D. or earlier, that People actually disappeared and are gone , without any TRACES, and this means Jesus rose form the dead and inherited GOD HIMSELF , which is a CONDITION OF INHERITANCE for a priest who is devout , dies and rises from the dead.

    • @CarmineFragione-u1t
      @CarmineFragione-u1t 15 днів тому +1

      So you see the reasoning of the Law. If the Jews wanted a mortal man to be King of Israel, the Way of the Lord to finally get to this juxtaposition of Law, is to first qualify a Priest of Temple Israel who is devout to become a Priest in the Order of Melchizedek, branching out to Many Nations, from SHEM, now the Priest of Temple Israel gives himself as a Propitiation for Sin and dies, then the ACT OF GOD IN HEAVEN must prevail, The acts of men cease to have merit, the moment of exaltation of the Priest who died, he must be RISEN from the dead, which requires the TRUTH OF GOD as the CAUSE of such Mysticism. Then the Priest who has risen from the dead, acquiring under Moses Law equity to the Title of God, "HIS SOLE INHERITANCE IS GOD HIMSELF". Then the Risen Messiah Priest, must come a SECOND TIME in a moment of HISTORY relevant to the issue of all the Promises of a restored or final ISRAEL who has a KING who is equal to GOD in TITLE. That is the progressive revelation of Jesus who rises and enters Glory and returns with legal standing of a "TITULAR HONORARIUM" or TITLE OF GOD applied to him , by the WITNESSES who must INHABIT HEAVEN ABOVE, the HEAVEN is of a singular Spirit of God but inside the Realm of Heaven are pluralized issues of Persons, Places and Things, which the Spirit has observed in History and taken those Memorial Events and put them in Heaven , as God acts as a Conservator of Data, a Living ENTITY with MEMORY , to conserve past events selectively and write HIS BOOK . 3=1

    • @deanfloyd8931
      @deanfloyd8931 12 днів тому

      @@CarmineFragione-u1t Fabulous point Carmine. You are saying His second coming was the time of judgement in the first century....is that correct?

    • @CarmineFragione-u1t
      @CarmineFragione-u1t 12 днів тому

      @@deanfloyd8931 There was evidence of some saints rising from the dead in the Gospel of Matthew chapter 27 verse 51 and 52. bodies of many "Holy People" rose, after Jesus' resurrection". This only works to attach to Moses Law for the Devout Priests, who follow after Aaron , in the House of Phinehas, he Sons of Zadok and called the SADDUCEES, in the time of Jesus. It seems this point of history was quieted down and suppressed, but it seems to rely on Moses saying the Sole Inheritance of the Devout Priests ( HOLY ONES) i.e. Aaron and the posterity of his title, had risen when Jesus was risen. So some strange event occurred , the SHINING ONES appeared at the tomb, many tombs were opened and Holy Ones were raised when Jesus was raised. And these appeared to many people, including the appearing of Jesus to many people who were then witnesses to a very strange series of events. So, you can find good reason to suspect there was a Rapture in those days, but a fulfillment of a Covenant Law can be repeated many times, for a good reason . Solomon said "There is nothing new under the Sun ,what will be is what has been before. " So these Signs are repeated, and so a future Rapture is available based on the conditions that require such strange things to happen, happen yet again.

  • @KiKaBi
    @KiKaBi 12 днів тому

    There is another UA-cam creator named JT follows JC that has put out videos on his research into the past. His research agrees with what you are saying.

  • @russelljones2305
    @russelljones2305 7 днів тому

    Even though we have Scriptures and yet Gentiles are ignorant of the history of the canonisation of Scripture in the first and second centuries. It is mind blowing that the Early writings are ignored of what they believed about the second coming of Christ.
    Interesting none of the modern eschatological views are supported back then and theologians are prepared to use historical revisionism and use circular reasoning to justify their position.
    I recognise the Historic Millennialist position is superior in Scriptural and historical evidence, most modern eschatological debates can not match the overwhelming historical documented evidence.

    • @DannyFesperman
      @DannyFesperman 7 днів тому

      Scripture was canonized by 64AD, when Peter completed the NT with his second epistle.

    • @russelljones2305
      @russelljones2305 6 днів тому

      @ wrong!

    • @DannyFesperman
      @DannyFesperman 6 днів тому

      @@russelljones2305
      Right!

    • @russelljones2305
      @russelljones2305 6 днів тому

      @ this the chronological order by date of when written: New Testament Books In Chronological Order
      Luke - 58-65 A.D.
      John - 80-95 A.D.
      Matthew - 50-65 A.D.
      Mark - 55-65 A.D.
      Acts - 61-64 A.D.
      James - 44-49 A.D.
      Galatians - 49-50 A.D.
      1 Thessalonians - 49-51 A.D.
      2 Thessalonians - 49-51 A.D.
      1 Corinthians - 55 A.D.
      2 Corinthians - 55-56 A.D.
      Romans - 56-58 A.D.
      Philemon - 57-62 A.D.
      Colossians - 60-62 A.D.
      Ephesians - 60-62 A.D.
      Philippians - 60-62 A.D.
      1 Timothy - 62-66 A.D.
      Titus - 64-65 A.D.
      1 Peter - 60-65 A.D.
      Hebrews - 61-69 A.D.
      2 Timothy - 66-67 A.D.
      2 Peter - 65-68 A.D.
      Jude - 60-80 A.D.
      1 John - 85-95 A.D.
      2 John - 85-95 A.D.
      3 John - 85-95 A.D.
      Revelation - 94-96 A.D.

    • @DannyFesperman
      @DannyFesperman 6 днів тому

      @@russelljones2305
      Nothing was written after the great tribulation 64-66AD.

  • @faithhope7777
    @faithhope7777 16 днів тому

    Your right we all owe Jesus more than we can ever repay...! Jesus returns in this generation. He is not talking about a single man generation. The rapture has been going on since the rising of Christ... We are in the tribulation. And the final sign for us that has already been put into the works is the force mark of the beast...! Go with God

    • @squishmellow3178
      @squishmellow3178 16 днів тому

      When you say, "He is not talking about a single man generation," what passage of scripture are you referring to?
      If you believe what you're saying and would like others to believe the same thing, what passage of scripture or scriptures are you referring to that teach it?

    • @faithhope7777
      @faithhope7777 16 днів тому

      @@squishmellow3178 That is a good question. It not a single verse, no one can hen peck there way for this, you must study... Start with Daniel, then the New Testament. It all starts with the Persians, then the Greek, I'm sorry I do not remember the third one name right now, then Rome... Just as this is our last world changing chance, this is also our last generation. Our first world was man in a perfect garden, and we mass that up, so, Jesus made us go to work, but still being free of Disease and wars. And we mass that up. So, Jesus pulls out all stops and step back a step from us. That when Jesus released the four horsemen... You know every foreign historic tale can be explained just by know where it all came from...! The Tower of Babble...! I hope I did not make this too simple, but with research you can put it together... Go with God www.oillamplight.org

  • @WalkingTemple-ws2si
    @WalkingTemple-ws2si 16 днів тому +4

    Your misunderstanding of Scripture is not authoritative. If the rapture happened already it creates more problems then the one you are trying to resolve. You need to think this through,
    The dead in Christ never rose in the first century.
    The Antichrist never entered into the temple and proclaimed himself to be god. We never entered into the time of Jacob's trouble. We never entered into our eternal incorruptible bodies.
    Cor 15

    • @DannyFesperman
      @DannyFesperman 16 днів тому +4

      Who is "we"? You were neither alive nor dead in 70AD, so, of course, none of that happened to you. That's why it wasn't talking about you. But it did happen to them.

    • @squishmellow3178
      @squishmellow3178 16 днів тому

      When you make the accusation that someone is misinterpreting scripture and you haven't provided an interpretation of your own, doesn't that seem hypocritical to you?
      I suggest you provide your own interpretation and let others cross examine it first before accusing others of misinterpreting scripture.
      The fact that you're not a 1st century old covenant jew should speak volumes.
      You're replacing the people in the bible and putting yourself in their place, why?

  • @appointedaday
    @appointedaday 15 днів тому +2

    You have 2 things you cannot fit so therefore it cannot have happened
    1 When did the son of perdition, 4 who opposes and exalts himself above all that is called God or that is worshiped, so that he sits as God in the temple of God, showing himself that he is God?
    2 When did And the kings of the earth, the great men, the rich men, the commanders hid in caves telling the rocks to fall on them and hide them from Him who sits on the throne and from the wrath of the Lamb?

    • @DannyFesperman
      @DannyFesperman 15 днів тому +2

      That all happened during the Roman destruction of Jerusalem.

    • @appointedaday
      @appointedaday 15 днів тому +1

      @ oh that’s easier to say
      But you have to prove it that’s your problem. When did these things happen? How was it fulfilled

    • @DannyFesperman
      @DannyFesperman 15 днів тому

      @@appointedaday First, you don't believe the Bible. Second, you can study Josephus and the life of Nero on your own. Third, I know that you will do neither.

    • @appointedaday
      @appointedaday 15 днів тому

      @ I absolutely believe the Bible
      And I have study those things
      And none of it fulfills the scriptures
      It’s on you be specific where and how exactly with the scriptures fulfilled
      I’m not gonna let you off that easy

    • @appointedaday
      @appointedaday 15 днів тому

      @@DannyFesperman I’ll hold my breath while you get some specifics
      When you get back, I’ll be the little blue boy in the corner

  • @ChrisMusante
    @ChrisMusante 16 днів тому

    Because RAPETURE (intentionally misspelled) is about the RELATIONSHIP that someone has with God. Then as a 'bride' you will 'bare good fruit'. This is why Jesus will judge our works and say, "I didn't KNOW you." So as to say that their works were prideful and divisive vs. humble and unifying.

  • @BecamePneuma
    @BecamePneuma 15 днів тому

    If people want more on this topic, please follow Chuck Baldwin with Liberty Fellowship MT. God Bless

  • @MasonHarrison-t3n
    @MasonHarrison-t3n 16 днів тому +1

    We are living in The Generation of Israels rebirth. Does this not sound significant???? God's word did not have time to be preached throughout the word as mentioned in the bible. 30 to 40 years to preach the Gospel throughout the world???... This guy is a false teacher

    • @ChrisC1776
      @ChrisC1776 16 днів тому

      The gospel was preached to everybody in their world. Paul says that the gospel was preached to everybody in the world.
      Colossians 1:23 You must, of course, continue faithful on a firm and sure foundation, and must not allow yourselves to be shaken from the hope you gained when you heard the gospel. It is of this gospel that I, Paul, became a servant-this gospel which has been preached to everybody in the world. It is clear. This preacher is right according to the bible and history of the Jewish War of 66-73. It was 7 years of complete destruction in history.

  • @rm19660
    @rm19660 15 днів тому

    A stopped clock is right twice a day. So one day there will be a last generation that thinks they are the last generation and they really turn out to be right😊

  • @MasonHarrison-t3n
    @MasonHarrison-t3n 16 днів тому

    This whole debate is when John wrote revelations....Most scholars believe 95-96 ad

    • @DannyFesperman
      @DannyFesperman 15 днів тому +1

      Let me fix that for you.
      "Most people who have already decided to have a futurist belief repeat Irenaeus, who has serious credibility problems".
      There. I fixed it for you.

  • @Jeaux_Bleaux
    @Jeaux_Bleaux 15 днів тому +3

    It's amazing people fall for false teachers like this guy. The Bible predicted it in the end times.

    • @DannyFesperman
      @DannyFesperman 15 днів тому +2

      Jesus promised to return in the first century.

    • @Jeaux_Bleaux
      @Jeaux_Bleaux 15 днів тому

      @DannyFesperman He didn't say that. He infact said "this generation" which is THE CHURCH this generation that we're in. We're in the church generation. Don't let Satan fool you.

    • @Jeaux_Bleaux
      @Jeaux_Bleaux 15 днів тому

      @DannyFesperman I hear you, man! It's not that. He was speaking to the church...why do you think it's been around for 2k years? The time is now. Good loves you, dude! So do i!

    • @Jeaux_Bleaux
      @Jeaux_Bleaux 15 днів тому

      Look at Biblical timeline. 4k years to christ. 2k years since christ. 6k years total right?

    • @DannyFesperman
      @DannyFesperman 15 днів тому

      @@Jeaux_Bleaux You not only have to change the meaning of "generation" to believe that, but you also have to ignore how "this generation" is used everywhere else in the Bible. In short, you are deceived.

  • @nathanielradtke7590
    @nathanielradtke7590 15 днів тому +1

    Uhh, because it didn't happen - yet.

    • @DannyFesperman
      @DannyFesperman 15 днів тому

      Jesus promised to return in the first century.

    • @KingNoor2007
      @KingNoor2007 14 днів тому

      Look around you, you don’t believe we are in a time of deception?
      We have been in the little time of Satan since 1526, the midpoint being 1776, and the endpoint 2026

  • @jamesadams8064
    @jamesadams8064 16 днів тому

    The trinity and rejection of god's name in baptism was invented by the Catholic church in the third century. This man is just another under cover/covert Catholic.

  • @Minecat140
    @Minecat140 15 днів тому

    By reading the Bible - IN TOTAL - and BELIVING IN IT, IN ITS CORRECT CONTEKST - futurism are the - ONLY logical way yo understand this. You guys have taken the liberty to allegorize Huge parts of the Bible - that clearly are not alegorical - in order to keep holding this position. Oh, my o my!

    • @DannyFesperman
      @DannyFesperman 14 днів тому +1

      Jesus promised to return in the first century. The apostles taught that Jesus would return in the first century. There are over 100 verses in the NT that prove it. You have to do a LOT of explaining away to avoid it.

  • @Wafflefries30
    @Wafflefries30 16 днів тому

    Jesus returned in 70ad bringing Armageddon; the thousand year reign followed that; we are now in the little season of Revelation 20 and the Gog and Magog war; the real year is somewhere in the neighborhood of 1325 ad; roughly 700 years were added to our timeline. Gunnar Heinsohn's
    work shows this wrong timeline.

    • @DannyFesperman
      @DannyFesperman 15 днів тому

      You are way off.

    • @KingNoor2007
      @KingNoor2007 14 днів тому

      I think at least 400-450 years were added

    • @DannyFesperman
      @DannyFesperman 14 днів тому

      @@KingNoor2007 No years were added. We actually have history that actually happened.

    • @KingNoor2007
      @KingNoor2007 14 днів тому

      @@DannyFesperman they had to have been because why is there a 400 year gap between the fall of Jerusalem and the fall of the Roman Empire?

    • @DannyFesperman
      @DannyFesperman 14 днів тому

      @KingNoor2007 Because it lasted 400 more years.

  • @johncrookston6111
    @johncrookston6111 15 днів тому

    The New testament does not agree with itself
    Jesus contradicts himself but then again Jesus never existed
    Those occultists who wrote the NT are the culprits
    Tough guy "pastor" lol

  • @johncrookston6111
    @johncrookston6111 15 днів тому

    The whole New Testament is garbage and blasphemy

  • @WalkingTemple-ws2si
    @WalkingTemple-ws2si 16 днів тому +1

    Answer; Because it never happened!!

  • @MasonHarrison-t3n
    @MasonHarrison-t3n 15 днів тому +2

    We are living in The Generation of Israels rebirth. Does this not sound significant???? God's word did not have time to be preached throughout the word as mentioned in the bible. 30 to 40 years to preach the Gospel throughout the world???... This guy is a false teacher

    • @DannyFesperman
      @DannyFesperman 15 днів тому +1

      Paul said it was. You don't believe the Bible.

    • @KingNoor2007
      @KingNoor2007 14 днів тому

      The world back then wasn’t literally the WHOLE WORLD.
      In Romans 1:8
      the word for “world” is “oikoumene”, emphasizing the spread of the faith across the inhabited world or the known world at that time, particularly the Roman Empire or the civilized parts of the earth known to the Greeks and Romans. It can also be translated as “the inhabited earth.”

    • @MasonHarrison-t3n
      @MasonHarrison-t3n 12 днів тому

      King James version Romans 1:8 said the faith is spoken of throughout the whole world, but to me this does not mean it was brought to all people groups as Jesus spoke in Math 24:14. Paul to me is saying that the seed has been planted for all to hear the word, and we are living in the time that the word is being brought to the world.
      That is getting ready to change pretty soon. Tribulation will be upon us soon. if the end came in 70 ad then what are we still doing here.....Why does the word still need to be preached??? bring the word to all and then the end......sure does not seem like the end to me. same problems 70 ad are present now.... Does not fit what Jesus said

    • @KingNoor2007
      @KingNoor2007 12 днів тому

      @ Revelation 20 is where you’ll find the answer. We are in Satans season

    • @MasonHarrison-t3n
      @MasonHarrison-t3n 12 днів тому

      @@KingNoor2007 sure it was. Jesus included all, not a cherry-picked world. Also, some people may have been on the fence about Christianity and needed more time to figure it out. Jesus would not accelerate the preaching of his gospel. Im not sure what the end means to you, but things seem the same as 70 ad. and probably worse... Jesus in Math24:14 said the end would come after preaching the gospel and for 2000 years same things happening... No end has occurred. open your eyes....ever read a book that said the end and behind that you had another 2000 pages??? It also figures with Genesis and that we will be on earth for 6000 years before the 1000 year millennium. approaching 6000 year time frame before the end and Jesus return