Circular Motion - A Level Physics

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 28 жов 2024
  • Consideration of Circular Motion, orbital speed, angular speed, centripetal acceleration and force - with some worked example.

КОМЕНТАРІ • 328

  • @ReProjectSD
    @ReProjectSD 8 років тому +188

    Not all heroes wear capes...
    Thank you.

  • @TheFunnyGUYryan
    @TheFunnyGUYryan 10 років тому +177

    That's a very long sheet of paper.

  • @DrPhysicsA
    @DrPhysicsA  11 років тому +33

    Many thanks for your kind comments.

  • @chilekwamatsotso7236
    @chilekwamatsotso7236 11 місяців тому +6

    Who else find his teachings excellent after 10 years .thank you sir ❤

  • @DrPhysicsA
    @DrPhysicsA  10 років тому +60

    for some reason, you tube stops me from responding to some comments which are listed as "linked comment". But to answer the question about what is a level, A-levels are exams taken by students in the UK and elsewhere when they are aged 17-18 the results of which usually determine whether they can go on to study at university.

    • @noormuhammadmalik2482
      @noormuhammadmalik2482 10 років тому +2

      I REALLY appreciate your work sir! Keep it up! :)

    • @KirentherenRavindra
      @KirentherenRavindra 10 років тому +11

      You're the best DrPhysicsA , you have helped me alot in understanding classical mechanics which has made my life very much easier. Keep doing what you love

    • @uusm9168
      @uusm9168 9 років тому +1

      DrPhysicsA haha I think the youtube hates physics at all xD

    • @rahul0000nm
      @rahul0000nm 9 років тому

      in india it is called jee mains and the second level is JEE ADVANCED........ where JEE stands for joint entrance exams .......

    • @SaiTejaSriramagiri
      @SaiTejaSriramagiri 8 років тому +1

      +Rahul Kashyap Actually it's a 12th grade syllabus, in India as well.

  • @Gismho
    @Gismho 2 роки тому +2

    All your "lectures" are excellent. Thank you so much. As a 74 year old, I find your descriptions most informative and comprehensive.

  • @whateveryh2119
    @whateveryh2119 8 років тому +31

    Wow, these videos are so great. I don't study this in school, nor will this physics stuff ever benefit me but I still watch these videos cause they are so damn entertaining.

  • @14henrylover
    @14henrylover 10 років тому +40

    Right now im studying A levels in the caribbean and my teacher is lazy so I thank you for your videos sir

  • @davedass5340
    @davedass5340 11 років тому +3

    Thank you sooo much doctor! I started my A2 revision 2 months before everyone/school and your videos are like my teacher and they are amazing. Thanks again.

  • @DrPhysicsA
    @DrPhysicsA  11 років тому +4

    True. I think that at the time I referred to t I hadn't introduced the concept of the period T so I used the general t for time. On the loop the loop - good point. Didn't think of that. Hope its not too confusing for the students. I'm minded of Leonard Susskind's videos where he sometimes finds himself using the same letter in an equation for two different purposes.

  • @DrPhysicsA
    @DrPhysicsA  11 років тому +2

    If this is an experimental result it is probably because the string twists around the knife before it is cut. But the theoretical position is that if you cut the string then the ball will fly off tangentially.

  • @DrPhysicsA
    @DrPhysicsA  11 років тому

    For the purposes of this question, all we need to do is to equate the gravitational force mg with the centripetal force mv^r/2. There will of course be a force between the car and the rail. This is sometimes called the centrifugal force. In practice, of course, it is simply the result of Newton's first law where the car is seeking to travel in a straight line but is compelled to follow the track in a circle. That force and the equal and opposite reaction force are not needed in this problem.

  • @EriAirlangga
    @EriAirlangga 7 років тому

    Balanced speed and clear intonation make this perfect delivery easy to understand! I am over 40 by the way and enjoying your teaching! Surely I will recommend your videos to my 10th grade son. Thank you sir!

  • @DrPhysicsA
    @DrPhysicsA  11 років тому

    What we are saying is that if we swing the bucket at the frequency of 1 cycle every 2 seconds then the gravitational force will match the centripetal force needed to keep the water in the bucket. If we swing faster we make it even more likely that the water stays in the bucket. Any slower and water falls faster than the bucket and therefore falls out of the bucket.

  • @pearudo9455
    @pearudo9455 9 років тому

    A great revision video. I learned this 3 year ago and have forgotten some points. You bring it all back to me. Thanks.

  • @DrPhysicsA
    @DrPhysicsA  11 років тому

    I'll put it on the list. But the key point about 2D momentum is that momentum is conserved along both the x and y axis. This means that you have to calculate the component of the velocities in each direction.

  • @DrPhysicsA
    @DrPhysicsA  11 років тому +1

    Because once we have established the acceleration at a specific point and shown that it does not change we have determined centripetal acceleration for the entire cycle.

  • @DrPhysicsA
    @DrPhysicsA  11 років тому

    Yes they are. Its just that f is the number of cycles (or full circles in your case) per second, while w (omega) is the number of radians swept out per second. Since there are 2 pi radians in one full circle w = 2 pi f

  • @DrPhysicsA
    @DrPhysicsA  11 років тому

    I am using the principle, set out in more detail in a separate video on the manipulation of vectors. In order to find the difference between two vectors, you set them tail to tail and then the difference is the vector representing the distance between the two tips. For a constant speed, the vectors have the same length but they change direction. Since they have the same length, you can construct a circle where the vector length represents the radius. The arc length represents the difference.

  • @masterblade713
    @masterblade713 11 років тому

    what took you less then thirty minutes took my highschool physics teacher three weeks, and you made it make much more sense, thank you sir

  • @zamuxolomdebuka9802
    @zamuxolomdebuka9802 10 років тому

    I am Varsity and I am studying physics in the second year level and I am using your videos a lot. thank for making physics fun.

  • @DrPhysicsA
    @DrPhysicsA  11 років тому

    Yes indeed. I think I say that you would in practice have to build in some spare capacity. But as you say, I doubt any such rides rely entirely on this kind of approach, not least in case the car gets stuck when it is upside down.

  • @July-gj1st
    @July-gj1st 8 років тому +4

    I love this channel, Physics is my first career choice for university (I am in my 2nd year of high school) and so I'm participating in a competition to see if I really like it, and man your videos are fantastic, they are very well explained, thank you. (My second choice would be biochemistry)

    • @haneenrahmeh7441
      @haneenrahmeh7441 8 років тому +1

      +July17 really nobody cares

    • @July-gj1st
      @July-gj1st 8 років тому +9

      +haneen rahmeh well you do, I mean all the people who really didn't cared ignored me. You commented. So thank you.

    • @bellabelieber111
      @bellabelieber111 8 років тому +1

      you're lucky you have something planned!Goodluck 😊

    • @elianadiaz7435
      @elianadiaz7435 8 років тому

      +haneen rahmeh PWNED.

    • @abbsterjonesy
      @abbsterjonesy 6 років тому

      You still like physics?

  • @mohdfm
    @mohdfm 9 років тому +3

    The height of h in the roller coaster, if kept 2.5a, then as some energy does get converted to heat and sound energy, it wont even just stay but will fall off.......although the whole explanation cleared all my doubts about centripetal force and acceleration. Thank you +DrPhysicsA for the awesome explanation.

    • @Mobliz
      @Mobliz 9 років тому +1

      +Mohammed Motorwala Yes this is why he mentions that in RL it wold be safer to design it at 3.0a. (at 20:33)

  • @kwankunghkg
    @kwankunghkg Рік тому

    Thank you for the excellent explanation 🙏
    Circular motion is one of the most difficult to understand topic within A-Level syllabus , when differential calculus is not a pre-requisite !

  • @DrPhysicsA
    @DrPhysicsA  11 років тому

    If there is no gravitational force it will certainly go round the loop because there is no force pulling it off. In that case it is simply obeying Newton's First law. It attempts to travel in a straight line but the track forces it to go round in the circle.

  • @kwangtan3409
    @kwangtan3409 8 років тому +1

    Excellent explanation of the concepts of circular motion. Thanks, I learnt much.

  • @DrPhysicsA
    @DrPhysicsA  11 років тому

    Yes you are right. I am just getting ahead of myself by assuming that the small value will in due course become a differential.

  • @DrPhysicsA
    @DrPhysicsA  11 років тому

    It wasn't needed for this example which ignores friction and similar. All this example is intended to show is that the gravitational force is responsible for the centripetal force which keeps the car on the track.

  • @krishan
    @krishan 11 років тому +2

    For the loop d loop question. Shouldn't centripetal force at the top = Reaction force + Weight? How come you dont need the reaction force?

  • @DrPhysicsA
    @DrPhysicsA  11 років тому

    Well the body which is travelling in a circle around some central object (whether the earth around the sun - by gravity or a ball circling your hand on a string) is accelerating inwards (otherwise it would fly off tangentially because of Newton's 1st law - as indeed it would if you cut the string). So there must be a force acting inwards called the centripetal force. Some people think the force acts outward (the so called centrifugal force). But this is really just Newton's 1st law again.

  • @DrPhysicsA
    @DrPhysicsA  11 років тому

    You can work out the orbital speed of the earth more easily than I did by saying that the earth completes one revolution (2πr) in 1 year. The radius is about 93 million miles. Convert a year to hours and then circumference/time will give you the solution in miles per hour. I think it comes to about 67,000 miles per hour which is equivalent to 30km/sec.

  • @Zishanthechotobai
    @Zishanthechotobai 5 років тому

    I m a professional teacher and got lots of help from you. Thanks and God bless you..

  • @riccardot2540
    @riccardot2540 7 років тому

    Your series is awesome! best one ive come across online :D thanks for all the effort!

  • @Dyslexic-Artist-Theory-on-Time
    @Dyslexic-Artist-Theory-on-Time 11 років тому +1

    Good video!
    This is an invitation to see an artist theory on the physics of light & time.
    Based on:
    1. The quantum wave particle function Ψ or probability function represents the forward passage of time itself with the future unfolding photon by photon.
    2. Is that Heisenberg’s Uncertainty Principle ∆×∆p×≥h/4π that is formed by the w-function is the same uncertainty we have with any future event within our own ref-frame that we can interact with turning the possible into the actual!

  • @arjunchauhan7339
    @arjunchauhan7339 8 років тому

    Dr. physicsA Hats off to your awesome dedicated video.

  • @PhantomPhoenix133
    @PhantomPhoenix133 9 років тому

    Your videos are great! I haven't learned this before but you make it easy to understand.

  • @DrPhysicsA
    @DrPhysicsA  11 років тому

    Strictly w is radians per second. frequency is revolutions per second.

  • @chriscross1152
    @chriscross1152 11 років тому

    Hello Doc. Another great job and others thanks from me to you.
    Two small comments if i may :
    - I should have used the letter T (instead of t) when you defined the velocity, (v=2 pi R/t) because this time t is, as you said, the duration of the journey of one cycle, it's then the period T by definition.
    - In your loop the loop example, i should have used another letter than a for the radius of the loop just to avoid the confusion with the acceleration you just defined before.

  • @raeesmustafa8763
    @raeesmustafa8763 9 років тому

    Superb Work sir, I am an avid lover of physics, and thanks to your channel, I can supplicate it with wealthy knowledge you share, absolutely amazing. - a Secondary School student admirer from Manchester.

  • @kashishkhandelwal9592
    @kashishkhandelwal9592 8 років тому

    If only all teachers were this good!

  • @malishyanga1075
    @malishyanga1075 9 років тому

    DrPhysicsA you are simply the best. i need one of your latest A level physics book.

  • @rmcfarland1743
    @rmcfarland1743 7 років тому

    I have a test on this tomorrow and this really helped! Thanks

  • @AkamiChannel
    @AkamiChannel 5 років тому +1

    5:30 Shouldn’t it be w = 2 Pi / T, as in capital T as in period? Seems like a mistake. If omega were dependent only on time that would be a little strange wouldn’t it?

  • @dipayanchakraborty4751
    @dipayanchakraborty4751 7 років тому

    what you explained is awesome. very nice. But sir, I think, while explaining the loop the loop problem, you could have talked about the pseudo Centrifugal force here (although, both of the centripetal and centrifugal forces have the same magnitude) because it has just the opposite direction of action w.r.t the centripetal one and then we can equate that to the weight (mg) which is acting down . Thank you sir. Your explanation was too beautiful to watch.

  • @paulcohen6727
    @paulcohen6727 7 років тому +3

    At the top of the Loop the Loop, you said that the centripetal force is provided by gravity at the top of the loop, but what centripetal force is drawing the car toward the center during the rest of its circuit? I suppose that for the upper half of the loop there is some component of gravity directed toward the center, but not for the lower half of the loop. Does a component of the normal force of the car on the loop contribute some centripetal force also? Is there a normal force at the top of the loop?

    • @User-ts2jj
      @User-ts2jj 6 років тому

      GPE

    • @yudishjunior3840
      @yudishjunior3840 6 років тому +1

      at the top of the loop, the car must have a minimum speed in order to stay in contact with the track.Thus by setting the speed =0 the Weight= Centripetal force .

    • @admiral_xanadu
      @admiral_xanadu 6 років тому +1

      Hi there, yes you are absolutely correct. Think about it, the reason why the cart is moving up along the circular track, instead of in a straight line, is because the circular track is there. So the contact force by the track causes the cart to move in that particular direction, which is in circular motion (not uniform though). At every position, the magnitude, the direction of the contact force by the track on the cart differs!
      Only at the precise moment where the cart is directly on the top of the loop, then this contact force is zero. Here, the sole contributor to the centripetal acceleration of the cart is its own weight.

    • @kevinortiz9893
      @kevinortiz9893 6 років тому

      The frictional force would be the net force acting towards the center because if there was no friction the car would just continue straight. friction force always acts opposite of the desired motion so as the car travels in a circle it would want to drift in a straight line but the static friction force is the centripetal net force that keeps it in its circular path

  • @EagleLogic
    @EagleLogic 8 років тому +1

    When you were doing the loop the loop problem, where did you get F = (mu^2) / (a) from? Thanks for the help teach.
    edit: Ahh I see. So a = v^2 / r. So we place that for a in F=ma.

  • @rosegirl1239
    @rosegirl1239 8 років тому

    Why is the acceleration for the bucket of water g? While we are swinging it on earth, shouldn't the centripetal acceleration depend on the centripetal force? Just a little confused, your response is greatly appreciated.

  • @mehleenis
    @mehleenis 11 років тому +2

    Thank you so much sir, the questions at the end were so helpful for application

  • @spandansaha168
    @spandansaha168 8 років тому

    darun guru darun .A+ video . I want it to get 10000000000 likes and 1million $ . keep it up . keep helping weak students like us . Thanks........... Don Icy Rhymez.

  • @EpicEditsBySaz
    @EpicEditsBySaz 11 років тому

    These videos look so amazing! Hopefully I can take a level physics next year in college, if so, i'm going to be using these video A LOT. Thank you so much in advance! :D

  • @douaaalnu3imy321
    @douaaalnu3imy321 8 років тому

    A car starts from rest and travels on a circular track whose radius is 85 m. The car’s tangential acceleration
    is a constant 6.8 m/s
    2
    . After the car has travelled a distance of 90 meters, calculate:
    the tangential and radial components of the acceleration, and the total acceleration
    please answer me

  • @princesarraf0314
    @princesarraf0314 Рік тому

    Video is well for students

  • @MrShapronForU
    @MrShapronForU 9 років тому +2

    very understandale , thanks for your lesson , it helped me very much!

  • @mscrazy1423
    @mscrazy1423 11 років тому

    Hi sir, how are u doing? Really thnx a lot for making this video sir, I'll sure be sharing this video with my friends, Once again thnx and really a awesome video

  • @pasanpawan1834
    @pasanpawan1834 11 років тому

    best physics teacher ever

  • @kudzaizvikwende9600
    @kudzaizvikwende9600 6 років тому

    Sir if I manage to become an architect...I'm gonna buy you a car...its people like you that produce the intelligent people of the future....

  • @xXxBladeStormxXx
    @xXxBladeStormxXx 11 років тому

    I just wanted to ask this about the Loop D' Loop. You saw that a centripetal force must be provided for it to have circular motion and this force is provided by gravity but even if there was no gravitational force acting on it, shouldn't it still go around as it is moving on a track and not in free space, thus there is the normal force which is providing the centripetal force. Also, we never considered the normal force in the equation to get the 2.5 * radius. Shouldn't it also play a role?

  • @natashajoyy4223
    @natashajoyy4223 3 роки тому

    Thank You! are we expected to know all this for A-level?

  • @benarjisai3869
    @benarjisai3869 8 років тому

    After a long time, I saw a good video.Really, friends, it's a good video and this helped me also

  • @anjalidutta8471
    @anjalidutta8471 6 років тому

    At 0:30 I also thought that the motion of the earth around the sun is governed by Kepler's Laws...and it has an elliptical orbit...so..it has a minor and a major axis as well..moreover...the one part of the orbit is closer to the sun and so the earth gets a little bit accelerated here....thanks..man...I really love the way you teach physics.. b.t.w. I am from India under ICSE board...

  • @mattymcdonnell
    @mattymcdonnell 10 років тому

    At the top of the loop, shouldn't you consider the reaction force from track pushing down as well as gravity? And if it is 'centrifugal force' as you say, how do you know that balances the reaction force?

  • @doctorkimcruises
    @doctorkimcruises 11 років тому

    If you take your pen or pencil, balance it on its tip, and let go. It falls over. How fast in m/s is the other end of the pen or pencil going when it hits the table, assuming the tip doesn't slip?
    Hint: Does the total energy of the pencil change if the tip doesn't slip?
    Details and assumptions:
    Model the pen/pencil as a uniform one dimensional rod of length 15 cm.

  • @Thetarget1
    @Thetarget1 11 років тому

    Fascinating. Great vid!

  • @mattymcdonnell
    @mattymcdonnell 10 років тому +1

    When deriving centripetal acceleration, How come you could use v as radius?

    • @DrPhysicsA
      @DrPhysicsA  10 років тому

      I am using the fact that the magnitude of the velocity remains the same but the direction changes. Using the rule about subtraction of velocities (see separate video) I can construct a circle using the magnitude of the velocity as the radius.

  • @amit3786
    @amit3786 11 років тому

    i liked this video very much the topic which i suffered most is almost clear! Thank you drPhysicsA :D

  • @kamilazdybal
    @kamilazdybal 9 років тому

    Awesome video! I have a question to the Loop the Loop example. You said that the centripetal force is provided by gravitational force at the highest point on the loop. But how is centripetal force provided at any other point on that loop? Especially, when a car is a quarter circle further from the highest point, where gravitational force is perpendicular to the direction where the centripetal force should be?

    • @DrPhysicsA
      @DrPhysicsA  9 років тому +2

      +Kamila Zdybał There will still be a component of the centripetal force provided by gravity except where the car is at the 3 and 9 o'clock positions where for an instant it is in free fall or ascent. But the component of gravity will kick in again moments later.

    • @kamilazdybal
      @kamilazdybal 9 років тому

      +DrPhysicsA Thanks, that's what I wanted to find out!

  • @jordanbartlett3836
    @jordanbartlett3836 10 років тому

    Any chance you could cover some questions from the OCR G485/G484 syllabus. Some past paper questions would be stellar; your explanations are very precise.

  • @boodywolverine
    @boodywolverine 10 років тому +1

    An Artillery gun and. A missle are adjusted for a training tasks
    A. What's the angle needed to acheive the greatest horiznotal range of the gun?
    B. What's the velocity of the projected missile if it reached maximum distance of 2000m when projected angle 60 degrees to the horizontal ?
    C. If the velocity of the missle on projection is 800 m/s what is its velocity 10 secs later when the gun makes an angle of 10 degrees to the vertical ?
    Please help me with this.

    • @DrPhysicsA
      @DrPhysicsA  10 років тому

      Have you seen my video on Projectile Motion - A Level Physics

    • @boodywolverine
      @boodywolverine 10 років тому

      DrPhysicsA yes, but question C was quite difficult

    • @jackinthebox4934
      @jackinthebox4934 10 років тому

      Wouldn't be 45 degrees?

  • @AutumnInsane123
    @AutumnInsane123 11 років тому

    i think in that example he is finding the min.h required w.r.t. a like what he had stated in the video, thus he considers N to be 0 when the car is just in contact with the loop. correct me if i am wrong.

  • @natureandchange
    @natureandchange 8 років тому

    why is the centripetal force is provided by the gravitational force of the car?. that's the logic behind it. please anser (at 19:22)

  • @bayanmorad7235
    @bayanmorad7235 7 років тому

    when calculating gravitational potential (phi) of a rocket for example, do we take the radius as the distance from the centre of mass of the planet or do we use the radius as the distance between the rocket till the surface of earth?

  • @ahmedal-ebrashy3691
    @ahmedal-ebrashy3691 7 років тому

    Thank you sir a lot for your time to teach. We need more people like you but if I can give a light criticism please never use a as radius it is so darn confusing. I keep reminding myself all the time that that is radius and not acceleration :)

  • @studywithsingh5065
    @studywithsingh5065 8 років тому

    will u please expalin me with practical example why angular displacement is not vector quantity

  • @carmelpule6954
    @carmelpule6954 8 років тому

    Very neat indeed, Congratulations.

  • @ramansb1213
    @ramansb1213 11 років тому

    loop de loop example was very good, thank you for the video sir

  • @RABBITAxANNIE
    @RABBITAxANNIE 11 років тому

    why the teachers in youtube so good compared to university prof. who claimed their self professionals anyway thank you

  • @markgromala5900
    @markgromala5900 11 років тому

    You say that if you cut the string it will travel in a line tangential to the circle at the point it is cut, but my teacher told me that it will not do that. I was told and in fact have tried this experiment and found the object will fly off in a direction that is at an angle of about 45 degrees above the tangential direction. Can you elaborate on this for me please? Thank you.

  • @cnu9948
    @cnu9948 10 років тому

    Sir,, i have a question? a particle moves in a circle in such a way that its tangential decelaration is numerically equal to its radial accelaration .if the intial velocity of the particle is 'u'. find the variation of its velocity with time t ?
    (hint: Radius is R)

  • @vijaykumarpanchal1532
    @vijaykumarpanchal1532 9 років тому +3

    pl. contine ur work god bless u

  • @yourfriend6692
    @yourfriend6692 6 років тому

    this video is really helpful... thank you very much

  • @mattymcdonnell
    @mattymcdonnell 10 років тому

    And finally in the bucket example, how come plugging in acceleration and radius and working out the corresponding omega and frequency values mean that, that is the frequency for the water to stay in?

  • @Zishanthechotobai
    @Zishanthechotobai 5 років тому

    Sorry I forgot to tell you are the no. 1 professor of the world...

  • @aitchisoniantutor1625
    @aitchisoniantutor1625 3 роки тому

    Wonderful work dear

  • @austinfahrenheit3191
    @austinfahrenheit3191 11 років тому

    When deriving the acceleration, what allows you to label the angle, arc length and time as rates of change? Thank you

  • @raniellabiancacoronado5318
    @raniellabiancacoronado5318 11 років тому

    Why are both the centripetal acceleration and centripetal force always directed inward the circle? I know that wherever direction the force is applied the the body will accelerate towards the same direction. But why inward? Please help me. Thank you!

  • @vincegredo
    @vincegredo 11 років тому +1

    you know what else runs in a circular motion ...... happiness

  • @baxtercohen
    @baxtercohen 5 років тому

    Gravitational force? Isn't it actually following the warp in space-time caused by the sun's mass?

  • @crickendeav
    @crickendeav 8 років тому

    Hi
    Firstly your videos are if great help. Thank you for that secondly i have a question there seems to be so maby formulas how is possible to get my head around all of them....

  • @HacBe
    @HacBe 7 років тому

    hello,
    how do you know that in the loop loop problem Fz=Fg ? (mu^2/a=mg)?

  • @chriscross1152
    @chriscross1152 11 років тому

    Also i should have mentionned that , in the loop the loop example, friction forces were disregarded. There are frictions on the railway and of course in the air so that an amount of potentiel energy is lost during the motion so that the minimum height should be much higher. Nowadays a high initial velocity is also provided at the higher point so that is no more necessary to build very high structures.

  • @leehauyuan
    @leehauyuan 11 років тому

    Why is the acceleration of the bucket the same with the gravitational acceleration??

  • @talhakhan8334
    @talhakhan8334 11 років тому

    alevel physics seems easy but scoring marks in exam are very hard .Alevel math seems hard but once practiced scoring marks are very easy

  • @denizkalkan2750
    @denizkalkan2750 9 років тому

    i love this guy, however i feel it will be better if you actully used figures also like an example of the theory.

  • @Anubis10110
    @Anubis10110 6 років тому

    You are amazing teacher.

  • @041Mgiga
    @041Mgiga 11 років тому

    When constucting the vector triangle can you use sin or cos rules to work out the unknown side?

  • @husseinbasim5994
    @husseinbasim5994 7 місяців тому +1

    yup

  • @Spirit-Consciousness
    @Spirit-Consciousness 11 років тому

    your lectures are alwayysss awesomee

  • @Kezzzler
    @Kezzzler 11 років тому

    why do you only consider the centripetal acceleration for example 2, but not for example 1??

  • @Zaxomio
    @Zaxomio 10 років тому

    how is the centripetal acceleration=g in the second example. If the bucket was above your head wouldn't the water accelerate downwards with the centripetal force and the gravitational force? What i don't understand is why the bucket doesn't fall down easier the faster it is swung.

    • @DrPhysicsA
      @DrPhysicsA  10 років тому +2

      The water in the bucket does indeed fall down. But it also has a sideways motion. The combination of the two means that it goes round in a circular orbit.