People need to remember who our country was founded on, who's laws, and who it is were suppose to be serving... That's God, God's Law..The Last Will and Testament of Jesus Christ
The defendant is the decedent, so it is easy once we know this is true. To write a letter and have it registered by mail does not cost that much does it once we understand the Justinian deception. Why employ, anyone, when it is only a letter to be sent in the first place? It's all about trust law?
factssssss! i charged family members for numerous chargers and the courts dismissed my claim because they are family members smh. seem the only way to receive justice agaisnt family members is through a restrining order smh
@@NJCOP747I saw where you can ask the judge to just for the record clarify on what points did he /she make the ruling or decision they did/ so it’s clear “for the record” this may wake them up that they overlooked some things, and nothing else, gets you ready for appeals
I'm not a lawyer but from what I've seen the US system is way better than the Australian system. As an ENTJ i appreciate the use of codes and clear definitions which the Australian legal system does not have.
You did an excellent job--boom, boom, boom. How would you motion for summ. judgmnt when due process of law was violated from the beginning, that after the viol of your due process, was then they found something in which to charge you with? How do you tackle that, telling court everything should be voided from moment your DP, was violated?
Will the judge give them another chance? Like how if one party doesn't show up in court the judge will give another court date.... Or once they miss the deadline will the judge rule in your favor?
In a partial summary judgement if the plaintiffs prove the defense broke the law , does the case goto damages or is that part of the case done and the rest goes to trial? There is professional misconduct involved in the partial summary motion.
Plaintiff always wins and we should never be defendant except in civil case, only if you harm another through violation of thier rights can or should you be a defendant
This question is deceptive. It's not your case. The only time it is your case is when it is your court. The only way you can be put in their case is when YOU consent. You consent when YOU accept the title assigned or simply neglect to respond. Non-responce is acquiescence. It's a game, people. Only YOU haven't been given the rules.
Because it’s based on game theory which is the social sciences. There’s a difference between positive and natural law. Also, we are dealing with public and private law. Game theory has to do with bias and prejudice.
Define fair. If you lost how were you right? Did the judge actually say to you that your were right but could not rule in your favor on grounds of sovereign immunity? Doubtful. I suspect your lawyer told you that.
Going through same thing but the sovereign immunity failed due to 14th amendment. City is claiming hard for immunity but not granted under the grounds which this case is based upon.
When a judge da an cops refuse one a case. Despite the mounting evidence. Against an person who has for 30 years. Tired to kill people. And use. Statue of limitations to prevent a trial. Can anything be done
The incompetent and children are wards of the state, basically employees of the state, under control of the state until they become competent enough to handle thier own affairs which you obtain through Christ
The public needs to know their rights
If you don't know your rights, you have no rights for ignorance of law which is public knowledge is no excuse according to Law
People need to remember who our country was founded on, who's laws, and who it is were suppose to be serving... That's God, God's Law..The Last Will and Testament of Jesus Christ
People need to find Jesus and serve God's Law if they want salvation and for kingdom of heaven to be here on earth as it is in heaven
Great lecture. This lawyer seems like someone I’d hire, and that’s saying something cause I DESPISE what lawyers represent.
The defendant is the decedent, so it is easy once we know this is true.
To write a letter and have it registered by mail does not cost that much does it once we understand
the Justinian deception. Why employ, anyone, when it is only a letter to be sent in the first place?
It's all about trust law?
Daunting yes! Its amazing how a family member can steal from you & the court not treat it as theft.
I think I know exactly what you're talking about. Sounds like something I went through and I'm still embroiled in but it went way off the rails.
factssssss! i charged family members for numerous chargers and the courts dismissed my claim because they are family members smh. seem the only way to receive justice agaisnt family members is through a restrining order smh
@@NJCOP747I saw where you can ask the judge to just for the record clarify on what points did he /she make the ruling or decision they did/ so it’s clear “for the record” this may wake them up that they overlooked some things, and nothing else, gets you ready for appeals
Like out of court settlement or gentlemens sgreements with mutal consents
Or out of court settlements
I love Learning Law! According to UCC codes. All debts are pre paid.
And the govt is supposed to pay our bills.
And negotiable instruments can be used to pay "bills"
According to what? Nothing says this. Courts will rule against you if you bring that up. @@blessedexpress4476
I'm not a lawyer but from what I've seen the US system is way better than the Australian system.
As an ENTJ i appreciate the use of codes and clear definitions which the Australian legal system does not have.
Thank you for sharing this information so comprehensively. This is excellently described...
Thank you so much for the resourceful information!!
Sokath! His eyes open! Darmok and Jalad in the ocean.
Great Episode with The Captain
You did an excellent job--boom, boom, boom. How would you motion for summ. judgmnt when due process of law was violated from the beginning, that after the viol of your due process, was then they found something in which to charge you with? How do you tackle that, telling court everything should be voided from moment your DP, was violated?
Outstanding! Just what I needed. 👍🏻
I am surprised that you did not cover the defending parties fails to enter a timely answer, resulting in Default and Default Judgment
Will the judge give them another chance? Like how if one party doesn't show up in court the judge will give another court date....
Or once they miss the deadline will the judge rule in your favor?
Great job at explaining.
New sub, I need to watch more of your videos because I have cases in court for violations of my first amendment.
In a partial summary judgement if the plaintiffs prove the defense broke the law , does the case goto damages or is that part of the case done and the rest goes to trial? There is professional misconduct involved in the partial summary motion.
Thank you
Everything is contractual. He's saying you're being sued for breach of contract. " What contract?" YOU ask. The one i just explained.
Can you tell me more about posting bonds?
I've been sued and judges ruled in favor of plaintiff...I'm in process of appeal
Plaintiff always wins and we should never be defendant except in civil case, only if you harm another through violation of thier rights can or should you be a defendant
When you respond as the "Decedent" you always lose.
@@peterthompson6651 💯
This question is deceptive. It's not your case. The only time it is your case is when it is your court. The only way you can be put in their case is when YOU consent. You consent when YOU accept the title assigned or simply neglect to respond. Non-responce is acquiescence. It's a game, people. Only YOU haven't been given the rules.
Statements of council in brief or argument are not sufficient for summary judgment Trensy vs Paglario
You can do a private administrative process and then take it to arbitration. Why even bother with court if you don't have to?
I proved my case, but didn't win because I was suing a sovereign entity,
I was right, it's not fair
Because it’s based on game theory which is the social sciences. There’s a difference between positive and natural law. Also, we are dealing with public and private law. Game theory has to do with bias and prejudice.
Define fair. If you lost how were you right? Did the judge actually say to you that your were right but could not rule in your favor on grounds of sovereign immunity? Doubtful. I suspect your lawyer told you that.
Was it a state?
Going through same thing but the sovereign immunity failed due to 14th amendment. City is claiming hard for immunity but not granted under the grounds which this case is based upon.
Now I do believe that has changed according to case law
When a judge da an cops refuse one a case. Despite the mounting evidence. Against an person who has for 30 years. Tired to kill people. And use. Statue of limitations to prevent a trial. Can anything be done
Thank u xplain good
These people deal with fiction. It's seriously unfair.
These people include you! Deal with Fiction! Money us fake, Clock Time ⏰ 🤪 is Non- Admissible
So we are Slave's ! BS Taxs.
The reply with a claim of your own based on Facts of the Matter according To Law
The incompetent and children are wards of the state, basically employees of the state, under control of the state until they become competent enough to handle thier own affairs which you obtain through Christ
You either serve man aka man's law. Or you Serve God and God's Law
What case?
Another version of Andria Rodriguez my ex girlfriend
😆😅😂🤣 Don't Fall for this FICTIONAL SYST-'EM OF LIE$ AND DIS-EASE