Re. Yates and striated glutes, they were striated - nobody came on stage with less fat and water than Dorian - what you’re seeing is 90s bodybuilders posing with their legs close together standing tall…current bodybuilders show their back while doing a half squat and squeezing their glutes together - it’s frankly ridiculous and there’s an old school Aussie IFFB pro who refers to it as taking a dump 😂…90s guys were mass monsters but still posed in a more classical way.
One thing I haven’t heard mention of is that Derek is leaning back significantly more than the others. It’s almost comical. You could say that this is good posing, but it also makes him look significantly wider and more tapered. I generally find him to look very wide yet flat compared to the others mentioned in the video. Last are flared out wide but he lacks thickness and three-dimensionality. When put up against Coleman he still lacks the width but gets completely destroyed in thickness.
Exactly this. Derek looks flat. Especially compared to Phil Heath who has a very 3D look and lots of detail. Derek looks wide, sure, but he's also flat. No 3D look to him, and less detail. I don't see how he wins just because of width when everything else is lacking.
@@dirtydard4870 yeah, not the best delts. Legs were for his time. In a couple of his vids though, he's been pretty unimpressed by his back double and lat spread, but I think they top tier. I dunno tho, maybe Im just a fan
For his era, best of all time. His overall shape is just too hard to beat. He nearly has the sweep shape of Derek, but without the oil, it was real muscle. So frame for frame, gotta go with samir and Ronnie. Followed by Phil for number 3.
@@paulcox2447"Without the oil" You guys are really desperate to take anything you can away from the guy. You have no proof of oil. On the other hand, you can clearly see that Lunsford was peeled to the bone from behind
Agree , this much muscle on such a short person just looks weird , samir beneut is even taller than Derek and is like 50 lbs lighter , His physique looks much better .
@uoiuo its a massive mistake that the 212 guys are flooding the open division, everyone is 5 6 now and it just looks off, no other way to put it. Classic guys shoukd move up into open, but there juat rly isnt an incentive for it, those classic guys look absolutely awesome and theyre not much less known than the open guys. That might be a good thing overall tho, but it definitely makes thr open less appealing for sure
@@finnmcpherson8717 Well that's your subjective opinion but is beside my point. It's simply not how they posed in earlier eras. Holding the feet together in mandatories and not constantly over flexing the glutes was the conventional standard. Wayne Demilia would tell the competitors, "gentleman FEET TOGETHER, front double bicep".
Standing akwardly isn't "better". Go look at Derek's front double bi, it looks stupid. It looks like a frog trying to stand up. Either way, it's their fault.. No, that's literally how the pose was done. When the announcer tells you to do it, you do it. You can often find them with one leg out. I like that variation If you prefer manlets with oil in their lats and think modern bodybuilding is actually good, I'm happy for you. At least you get to enjoy it. For the most part, stuff sucks now. The sport peaked in the 90's and 2000's. Since Phil it's been weak AF. @@Mo-kl4fb
@@lakeeriesailor2852 Dorian was 5'11, not 5'10. He was the same height as Lee Haney. Don't try and pull the "everyone is lying" game. There is no conspiracy.
@@granddaddyofthemall6320😂😂 Everyone thinks ronnie had the best back in fact, you actually discredited yr own bb credentials with that statement - as for op Haney shouldn’t be 3 but phil should, if not 2
Phill is the winner IMO 8:50 is nuts. Any width he is lacking in, he makes up with fullness, better lines/separation, and that crazy 3D aspect to him, which really is the best way to describe phil. Makes everyone look flat in comparison
Width - no point considering this really; it depends on the structure of the individual. Only muscular development should matter; this is displayed through proper conditioning. Yes, it’s also largely genetic, but the size and overall development of the muscle is what one trains for
@@timjones7336 I disagree i think its a combination of those things, AND who looks the best with it. It really is a pageantry in sense. I think the genetic frame it goes on is just as important factor as any other to win, realistically. The best bodybuilders usually have the biggest illusion, especially for phil who only ever weighed like 240 on stage, it was a factor for his success and having such a 3d look. Being narrow, he still is extremely genetically gifted structurally, and proportionally. Even his narrow chest and clavicle for example, is arguably his biggest weakness structurally, but also plays into the illusion of his craziest poses. hitting a hands clasped most muscular, adds to the illusion of the rest of him being so big in comparison
@@TheCalvinnnnn Phil won 7 olympia in a row where every competitor next to him had a wider back.. So it did work like that. Of course derek wins in total width, with an awesome lower body, and world class back, but phils back is winning on every aspect.. Thickness and muscularity, deep cuts all along his shoulder blades and traps, even his sillhowette and proportions from the back are beating derek.. Usually the wider guy has a better silhouette but not here.. Derek's silhouette is a lot more waist than back.. like his lats flair only is by his shoulder blades, while phils lats flair like one giant muscle belly from top all the way to bottom and also has the smaller waist
@@carlosgalaviz349 I don’t think anyone who actually knows about bodybuilding would ever call someone delusional for saying Dorian Yates had the best back of all time. That’s like calling someone delusional for saying tiger woods is the best golfer ever
@@Imperialbbuilding imo Phil can beat him in the bdb indeed, that detail is just crazy and he is shredded from top to bottom and nothing is lacking. It is not always just about width and overall mass.
I think Phil and Dorian are right there with him in their respective aspects, Dorian with his granite conditioning and Phil with his incredible roundness and bubblyness, at the end of the day Ronnie would probably win the overall because he was just so huge he'd merc them both on size and freak factor, especially the side chest would display the huge difference in total mass, but I don't think his back alone is better than theirs, thicker perhaps but not better.
Anyone who thinks Derek has the best back, knows absolutely NOTHING about bodybuilding! And no disrespect to him (cause I absolutely admire his work ethic and he does seem like a genuine nice guy), but he will probably forever be known as one of the weakest Mr O's period! The only thing he has going, is his impressive X frame cause of how super wide he is, but that's it! Look at most previous Mr O pics after they won, and we all looked on admirably, thinking now that's a Mr O physique! We did it with Heath (before bubble gut creeped in), Rhoden, Brandon (even with his small legs), Ramy and Choopan! This year when we saw picks of Derek after winning, we saw a bodybuilder with crazy width, but lackluster EVERYTHING else not to mention SOFT and almost none existing calves!!!! And those who think otherwise, are just fan boys who cannot separate themselves from being sycophants and think objectively! Anyways, rant over😂
It’s Derek X frame. We’ve had big guts or a wide waist for 25 years with the exception of Rhoden and Dexter. We never get to see small waists in open. Hadi was descent but I wouldn’t consider his waist small.
The biggest lackluster feature in Drek is the (almost) complete lack of oil and very bad/flat lighting of the stage, both of them clearly taking from his otherwise very good back.
Those giant lumps of oil in Lunsford's lats are unforgivable, and they should've been enough to keep him out of the top 4 if not 5. The fact that he won the last Olympia just blows my mind.
Derek's back is very impressive but let's face facts. He's loading SEO in the Teres major/minor muscles. But esp the Teres major. Because so it's adding inches to his width. Dorians back is easily the most impressive when you take into consideration that Dorian always showed up on stage not only peeled front to back but also flat. If Dorian competed today he'd come in fuller and rounder and his back would be absolutely mind boggling. He'd also pose like the guys do today and it would be insane.
Yea that’s what many people fail to realize about Dorian. If he came in full he’d look like those black and white pics and there wouldn’t even be need of a comparison of who’s back was best.
His lats/teres are much too separated to be full of oil from the back, I think that width is real but he just pins too much in his lats so they are inflamed
Dorian's back in 1997 is relatively what he would show up with if he competed nowadays. highly underrated version of Yates that totally gets overshadowed by his torn tricep and distention in the midsection. I encourage everyone to watch the 1997 Mr Olympia posing routine and tell me that back isn't one of the freakiest things we've seen on stage
i HATE the way todays bodybuilders do the back double - squatting their legs and leaning way back to give the illusion of a wider back. stand up straight and more asthetic like Arnold did and lets see your back.
Derek definitely has the most overhyped back in history! Yeah he is wide but no 3D look and in my honest opinion should not even be in the conversation for top 5 Olympia
Thanks for the comparison, however in my opinion the flow, the proportions and overall impact is much better for Samir, Dorian and Ronnie. Derek is damn good though without a doubt but not the best back as yet, at least in my opinion.
Fan Request: 4-way matchup between 2022 Derek & Hadi and 2023 Hadi & Derek. Itt would be interesting to see how these packages stack against each other
I honestly don’t think anyone can beat Derek in the back double bi that is just freaky even if there is a little synthol involved he used it well, back lat spread however gotta give to Dorian or Ronnie
but ... marx max muscle, you made derek the same height as flex in that bdb. He should be much shorter because he's "bending at the knees" and leaning back.
one point that the old bb's have against them is the posing itself, they usually squished the traps together unlike nowadays, for dorian specially modern posing would make a huge difference
I disagree Dorian didn't know how to pose his back. His posing routines weren't riveting (it was almost the same thing every year) but he actually was one of the bodybuilders that knew how to hit mandatory poses. It's part of the reason we have such fantastic back shots even with the crappy 90s quality video. *_He held the pose well, kept STILL, and didn't lean backwards_* which HIDES lower back detail.
@@MattGaetzOnAWhiteFordBronco I don't mean he don't know how to hit a pose, but I mean that the posing changed over the years, if he hit it like nowadays he would be more competitive against Dereck, just like if Dereck tried hitting it like in the 90 the display would change and he would have less width and a lesser vtaper
@@luizansounds - that's why we have the lat spread pose, to assess width and taper 🙃 I get what you're saying, but Derek's style suits him because while he is more aesthetically pleasing, he's shorter. Legs spread wide to showcase his muscle development (glutes) and create an X-frame.
Derek looked better in 212. He went overboard with the synthol when he went into the open class. Too many guys don’t wanna take the time to put on size nowadays. They want overnight improvements.
If Dorian was young and competing today he'd just nix those last few weeks of conditioning and come in with greater structure and at least equal conditioning to everyone else.
His upper lat flare might be the best in terms of width but I'm not sure I'd call his back the best, he doesn't have the extreme hardness of a Nick Walker (In the back itself mind you, lower half is impressively hard), he doesn't have the superior cuts and detail of a Michal Krizo and he doesn't have the impressive thickness of a Samson Dauda or Hadi Choopan, with those lower lats hanging of like massive slabs of meat. He is very very good, of that there is no doubt, but I'm hard pressed to call him the best, even of the current top 10. I also don't like the concave shape of the flare itself as opposed to the more straight or convex shape we generally see from just about anyones elses lat spread, makes it look there's an empty space just covered with skin between upper lats and lower lats where a good deal of meat should be. I'm probably being nitpicky as hell but hey, he's the mr.Olympia so I guess it's his turn.
Ronnie has almost Sampsons height and frame with thickness at or above Hadi. Standing next to Derek, Derek would look like the 202 competitor that he is. 5'5 235 standing bow legged vs a 5'11 300lb guy standing straight up. Then the 300lb guy has more detail to boot lol. the quality is just very different with a lot of these guys (worse). Krizo at least comes in with dry, hard, shapely muscle. Gotta give him that.
😂all these big guys would still lose to Dorian, nobody has the combination of size with conditioning with symmetry. Only part I see Dorian losing are quads and hamstrings, but then he brings those monster calfs nobody has. I see so many muscle fibers in the back.
The Dorian photos are hilarious. He’s further away. Put derek against the best Dorian- the black and white photos. Ur comparing Derek’s current best against Dorian not at his best. Apples To oranges. Derek would get laughed off stage against any of those 3. Would never win
The black and white photos from 95 are classics. Kudos who decided to shoot it like that. Everybody was in better shape than what you'd see on the video.
I'm tried of people using the terrible 1995 pictures, 1995 was arguably as conditioned as 1993 if you use the right pictures. Also dorain is most definitely wining in both back poses.
Everybody from that era says that dorian was may more impressive in Person than on pictures. I really like the comparisons, but the guys standing in person next to another would be a whole lot different.
Bro, Dorian, Phil, Ronnie DEMOLISH Derek The Lump! huR DuR hE's WiDE, come on man. He has no 3d effect, no striations or grainy hard muscle in the back and not nearly as much separation. What are you smoking MMM
It's good to see some sensible people on here giving Derek his props for having one of the best back of all time and for people recognizing Ronnie back was overrated and sloppy. Ronnie is sloppy he looks like a woman, high waist like a woman, over developed glutes like a woman, he couldn't pose he was uncoordinated like a woman. Phil and Derek has the best backs of all times, big and sloppy don't make you have best back i.e. Ronnie.
Stop the foolishness. Derek has the widest back but not the best back. It's about volume and detail as well. And stop with glutes nonsense too causes they didn't need to flex them in the past.
Lunsford has a lot of flaws. Smooth front dbl bi and Without peaks No lower lats tied in Small calves Back pose here he arches shoulders towards judges Legs are too short for body and poses like riding a horse Imo not a pleasing physique
Hes got alot of width and thickness, but those high lat insertions give his back a concave shape in the lower lat. Compared to dorian it makes his back look
Its a weird thing with Lunsford, he gets really shredded from the back comoared to his soft front and usually that's the really difficult part about conditioning, not the conditioning from the front but from the back. He has a great back, no doubt, but he must be penalized from the front thanks to those lumps in the lats...
@@housesports000 I wanted Lunsford to win but I just couldn't see him winning, I mean it was close , really close, but Chopan won most poses imo, I think that politics were the decisive factor, Lunsford becoming more popular and the difficulties they have with dudes like Ramy and Chopan promoting the business...
I dont understand lets say thats oils synthol injections or whatever why do it? it literally looks better without and plus if a guy as genuinely decent as Derek would do that then how many others do it to and again what's the point ?
@@danielhicks4826 Well, Ramy and Chopan were doing it before Lunsford at the open level and they got rewarded three years in a row, so for whatever reason Lunsford is doing i nowt, to improve weaker parts, to look bigger or who knows, I think the real problem is the judges not punishing it...the minute the judges started punishing the bubble gut, dudes began to check it and keep it under control. I mean, you even got Cbum, the supposedly aesthetic representation of this era, with very suspicious looking shoulders and lumps on his quads, and he still gets rewarded...
Top 7 BEST backs: 7.- Derek Lunsford 6.- Franco Columbu (taking into consideration his era) 5.- Lee Haney 4.- Kai Greene 3.- Phil Heath 2.- Dorian Yates 1.- King Coleman
Dorian has the best back of all time why do all these people think it's just the standard thing to say that Ronnie Coleman is the best Dorian was 9 and 0 versus Ronnie Coleman Coleman never wins anything if Dorian doesn't retire I just don't understand what these people are seeing Jay Cutler should have beaten Ronnie like four times they just wouldn't give it to him Cutler had him beat three or four times and they didn't give it to him
@@zolni3rz you need to check yourself into a mental hospital I would say 75% of the bodybuilding world says Dorian has the best back yet you idiots on these comments sections come on here and kiss Coleman's ass all the time Evan Jay Cutler said that Ronnie's back couldn't touch dorian's this is Jay Cutler saying that so did Chris aceto so did Kevin levrone so did Chris Cormier
@@Jsizzle6809 exactly and the other thing people forget is that Dorian beat Ronnie every time he ever went against him and let's say in 98 it had been closed and Dorian had won again and Coleman and came out looking like that Dorian would have known the next year to come out not so trimmed down and he would have bought himself up to that level and crushed Coleman all you need to do is look at those black and white pictures where dorian's bigger than Ronnie was ever big that's all you got to do Dorian could have showed up on stage like that and just devastated the competition he still was almost just as dry and he would have destroyed Coleman's best it wouldn't even have been closed Dorian easily could have came to the stage like that
Derek looked like he was back in 212 when Ronnie came out 😂
Re. Yates and striated glutes, they were striated - nobody came on stage with less fat and water than Dorian - what you’re seeing is 90s bodybuilders posing with their legs close together standing tall…current bodybuilders show their back while doing a half squat and squeezing their glutes together - it’s frankly ridiculous and there’s an old school Aussie IFFB pro who refers to it as taking a dump 😂…90s guys were mass monsters but still posed in a more classical way.
One thing I haven’t heard mention of is that Derek is leaning back significantly more than the others. It’s almost comical. You could say that this is good posing, but it also makes him look significantly wider and more tapered. I generally find him to look very wide yet flat compared to the others mentioned in the video. Last are flared out wide but he lacks thickness and three-dimensionality. When put up against Coleman he still lacks the width but gets completely destroyed in thickness.
Exactly this. Derek looks flat. Especially compared to Phil Heath who has a very 3D look and lots of detail. Derek looks wide, sure, but he's also flat. No 3D look to him, and less detail. I don't see how he wins just because of width when everything else is lacking.
Exactly, flat back. Phil made that evident.
Horrible traps as well.
Leaning way back, horrible.
Gotta have the illusion when you lack the actual muscle
What's with the rating of Sammir's back recently? I thought he did amazing next to Derek here.
Small legs from behind and really undersized shoulders, but yeah his back double is nearly perfect
@@dirtydard4870 yeah, not the best delts. Legs were for his time. In a couple of his vids though, he's been pretty unimpressed by his back double and lat spread, but I think they top tier. I dunno tho, maybe Im just a fan
For his era, best of all time. His overall shape is just too hard to beat. He nearly has the sweep shape of Derek, but without the oil, it was real muscle.
So frame for frame, gotta go with samir and Ronnie. Followed by Phil for number 3.
@@paulcox2447"Without the oil" You guys are really desperate to take anything you can away from the guy. You have no proof of oil. On the other hand, you can clearly see that Lunsford was peeled to the bone from behind
Yes Samir is more aesthetic and has better insertions, but this is open bodybuilding so Derek being twice as big should count for something at least.
To be honest I prefere pretty much every Back you showed compared to Derek's.
Agree , this much muscle on such a short person just looks weird , samir beneut is even taller than Derek and is like 50 lbs lighter , His physique looks much better .
I agree that the conditioning and dryness just isn't there with Derek
@uoiuo its a massive mistake that the 212 guys are flooding the open division, everyone is 5 6 now and it just looks off, no other way to put it. Classic guys shoukd move up into open, but there juat rly isnt an incentive for it, those classic guys look absolutely awesome and theyre not much less known than the open guys. That might be a good thing overall tho, but it definitely makes thr open less appealing for sure
Dereks upper body conditioning is softer than all the greats. Phil, Flex, Dorian, Samir
Samir Bannout - unbelievable back
You should've taken into account that Derek bows his legs out and flexes his glutes super hard which older BBs didn't do.
So he’s better at posing?
@@finnmcpherson8717 Well that's your subjective opinion but is beside my point. It's simply not how they posed in earlier eras. Holding the feet together in mandatories and not constantly over flexing the glutes was the conventional standard. Wayne Demilia would tell the competitors, "gentleman FEET TOGETHER, front double bicep".
@@doublem1975x Their bad for not optimizing their posing to portray the best X shape
meh not really cuz it was not mandatory to do that at their time
@@Mo-kl4fb
Standing akwardly isn't "better". Go look at Derek's front double bi, it looks stupid. It looks like a frog trying to stand up. Either way, it's their fault.. No, that's literally how the pose was done. When the announcer tells you to do it, you do it. You can often find them with one leg out. I like that variation
If you prefer manlets with oil in their lats and think modern bodybuilding is actually good, I'm happy for you. At least you get to enjoy it.
For the most part, stuff sucks now. The sport peaked in the 90's and 2000's. Since Phil it's been weak AF. @@Mo-kl4fb
Dorian was 257 in 93 and Derek was 235 in 23
Also height of 5’10”, not 6’
@@lakeeriesailor2852 Dorian was 5'11, not 5'10. He was the same height as Lee Haney. Don't try and pull the "everyone is lying" game. There is no conspiracy.
Pound for pound he was heavier than Dorian
@@NikosNikos-dr7wv and more watery as well
In the back double samirs back looked better sure he was smaller but his back condition looked crazy especially for that era
Sammir's quality and separation was the best, regardless of weight
Best Olympian backs: 1. Ronnie 2. Dorian 3. Haney 4. Phil 5. Samir (honorable mention Dex and Franco)
👍👍👍 100% agree
Great list actually. Derek has a very good chance to make the Mt. Rushmore but needs just a lil’ more of something
You don't know what you are talking about Ronnie back was sloppy. Best backs are Phil, Derek, and then the rest!
ua-cam.com/video/8ExsNaU194g/v-deo.html
@@granddaddyofthemall6320😂😂 Everyone thinks ronnie had the best back in fact, you actually discredited yr own bb credentials with that statement - as for op Haney shouldn’t be 3 but phil should, if not 2
Phill is the winner IMO
8:50 is nuts. Any width he is lacking in, he makes up with fullness, better lines/separation, and that crazy 3D aspect to him, which really is the best way to describe phil. Makes everyone look flat in comparison
I gotta agree. Complete in every aspect. To think his back was a weak point at the start of his pro career.
Width - no point considering this really; it depends on the structure of the individual. Only muscular development should matter; this is displayed through proper conditioning.
Yes, it’s also largely genetic, but the size and overall development of the muscle is what one trains for
No you can’t lack in width when talking about back. Doesn’t work like that you need width and thickness. Phil heath does not win.
@@timjones7336 I disagree i think its a combination of those things, AND who looks the best with it. It really is a pageantry in sense. I think the genetic frame it goes on is just as important factor as any other to win, realistically. The best bodybuilders usually have the biggest illusion, especially for phil who only ever weighed like 240 on stage, it was a factor for his success and having such a 3d look. Being narrow, he still is extremely genetically gifted structurally, and proportionally. Even his narrow chest and clavicle for example, is arguably his biggest weakness structurally, but also plays into the illusion of his craziest poses. hitting a hands clasped most muscular, adds to the illusion of the rest of him being so big in comparison
@@TheCalvinnnnn Phil won 7 olympia in a row where every competitor next to him had a wider back.. So it did work like that. Of course derek wins in total width, with an awesome lower body, and world class back, but phils back is winning on every aspect.. Thickness and muscularity, deep cuts all along his shoulder blades and traps, even his sillhowette and proportions from the back are beating derek.. Usually the wider guy has a better silhouette but not here.. Derek's silhouette is a lot more waist than back.. like his lats flair only is by his shoulder blades, while phils lats flair like one giant muscle belly from top all the way to bottom and also has the smaller waist
Dorian’s back from 1995 Olympia is GOAT
ua-cam.com/video/8ExsNaU194g/v-deo.html
Nahh, Ronnie 2003 is better
@@SureBone99 nah too soft compared to Dorian’s.
@@Jsizzle6809lmao enjoy your delusions we won’t intervene
@@carlosgalaviz349 I don’t think anyone who actually knows about bodybuilding would ever call someone delusional for saying Dorian Yates had the best back of all time. That’s like calling someone delusional for saying tiger woods is the best golfer ever
Ronnie has the best back shots in the history of bodybuilding. No one is even close
Lat spread yes, Phil beats him in the back double
Pause
ua-cam.com/video/8ExsNaU194g/v-deo.html
@@Imperialbbuilding imo Phil can beat him in the bdb indeed, that detail is just crazy and he is shredded from top to bottom and nothing is lacking. It is not always just about width and overall mass.
I think Phil and Dorian are right there with him in their respective aspects, Dorian with his granite conditioning and Phil with his incredible roundness and bubblyness, at the end of the day Ronnie would probably win the overall because he was just so huge he'd merc them both on size and freak factor, especially the side chest would display the huge difference in total mass, but I don't think his back alone is better than theirs, thicker perhaps but not better.
Anyone who thinks Derek has the best back, knows absolutely NOTHING about bodybuilding! And no disrespect to him (cause I absolutely admire his work ethic and he does seem like a genuine nice guy), but he will probably forever be known as one of the weakest Mr O's period! The only thing he has going, is his impressive X frame cause of how super wide he is, but that's it! Look at most previous Mr O pics after they won, and we all looked on admirably, thinking now that's a Mr O physique! We did it with Heath (before bubble gut creeped in), Rhoden, Brandon (even with his small legs), Ramy and Choopan! This year when we saw picks of Derek after winning, we saw a bodybuilder with crazy width, but lackluster EVERYTHING else not to mention SOFT and almost none existing calves!!!! And those who think otherwise, are just fan boys who cannot separate themselves from being sycophants and think objectively! Anyways, rant over😂
Agreed. I hope he loses the title next year.
Right said. Worst dominant Mr. Olympia.
Horrible arms as well.
I've been saying it, he does not belong in the Open Class as well.
It’s Derek X frame. We’ve had big guts or a wide waist for 25 years with the exception of Rhoden and Dexter. We never get to see small
waists in open. Hadi was descent but I wouldn’t consider his waist small.
If Derek gets more depth to his back i think he'll be in conversation, but for now theres a few ahead of him
1 Ronnie 2 Phil 3 Dorian, 4 Haney 5 Samir 6 Kai 7 Dexter 8 Franco and maybe u could put Derek at 10 yes Ik im missing 2 spots
you're just hating rn bro 😂
Dorian had better back than Ronnie.
But pound for pound, Derek is the biggest
The biggest lackluster feature in Drek is the (almost) complete lack of oil and very bad/flat lighting of the stage, both of them clearly taking from his otherwise very good back.
Those giant lumps of oil in Lunsford's lats are unforgivable, and they should've been enough to keep him out of the top 4 if not 5.
The fact that he won the last Olympia just blows my mind.
Derek's back is very impressive but let's face facts. He's loading SEO in the Teres major/minor muscles. But esp the Teres major. Because so it's adding inches to his width. Dorians back is easily the most impressive when you take into consideration that Dorian always showed up on stage not only peeled front to back but also flat. If Dorian competed today he'd come in fuller and rounder and his back would be absolutely mind boggling. He'd also pose like the guys do today and it would be insane.
Yea that’s what many people fail to realize about Dorian. If he came in full he’d look like those black and white pics and there wouldn’t even be need of a comparison of who’s back was best.
His lats/teres are much too separated to be full of oil from the back, I think that width is real but he just pins too much in his lats so they are inflamed
could also be swolen lymph knots
He does have the best midsection
Dorian's back in 1997 is relatively what he would show up with if he competed nowadays.
highly underrated version of Yates that totally gets overshadowed by his torn tricep and distention in the midsection.
I encourage everyone to watch the 1997 Mr Olympia posing routine and tell me that back isn't one of the freakiest things we've seen on stage
i HATE the way todays bodybuilders do the back double - squatting their legs and leaning way back to give the illusion of a wider back. stand up straight and more asthetic like Arnold did and lets see your back.
i was thinking about this the other day. his back is wider than phil, although not as thick. hes really competitive in the back.
actually almost everyone has a wider back than Phil, that in itself is not really a point for derek.
@@GC-by6izhe's Probaly as wide as Ronnie in the bdb tho
Should've used Dorian's back of 1997, it was the biggest that year
Definitely 💯 His back was INSANE in '97
Derek definitely has the most overhyped back in history! Yeah he is wide but no 3D look and in my honest opinion should not even be in the conversation for top 5 Olympia
you blind?
Probably a Hadi meat rider
@@lilcups18 he is not top 5 back
@@gabriellr1986 you blind?
@@senex_rl9390 no 3D look just wide with a striated ass, just like any Asian guy
Thanks for the comparison, however in my opinion the flow, the proportions and overall impact is much better for Samir, Dorian and Ronnie. Derek is damn good though without a doubt but not the best back as yet, at least in my opinion.
That Flex Wheeler back double bi is nuts… so aesthetic!
The calves!!!!!
Derek's back looks softer to me than every single other back featured in this video, idk why people say he's peeled
Fan Request: 4-way matchup between 2022 Derek & Hadi and 2023 Hadi & Derek. Itt would be interesting to see how these packages stack against each other
Dereks glutes are INSANE
I honestly don’t think anyone can beat Derek in the back double bi that is just freaky even if there is a little synthol involved he used it well, back lat spread however gotta give to Dorian or Ronnie
but ... marx max muscle, you made derek the same height as flex in that bdb. He should be much shorter because he's "bending at the knees" and leaning back.
Dorian the best back, front lat spread, back lat spread and a good back double too. Quality and with count. Ronnie is big but not better back.
one point that the old bb's have against them is the posing itself, they usually squished the traps together unlike nowadays, for dorian specially modern posing would make a huge difference
I disagree Dorian didn't know how to pose his back. His posing routines weren't riveting (it was almost the same thing every year) but he actually was one of the bodybuilders that knew how to hit mandatory poses. It's part of the reason we have such fantastic back shots even with the crappy 90s quality video. *_He held the pose well, kept STILL, and didn't lean backwards_* which HIDES lower back detail.
ua-cam.com/video/8ExsNaU194g/v-deo.html
@@MattGaetzOnAWhiteFordBronco I don't mean he don't know how to hit a pose, but I mean that the posing changed over the years, if he hit it like nowadays he would be more competitive against Dereck, just like if Dereck tried hitting it like in the 90 the display would change and he would have less width and a lesser vtaper
@@luizansounds - that's why we have the lat spread pose, to assess width and taper 🙃 I get what you're saying, but Derek's style suits him because while he is more aesthetically pleasing, he's shorter. Legs spread wide to showcase his muscle development (glutes) and create an X-frame.
EXACTLY, Look at how Derick stands, he's legs are bowed out and he's literally standing wider, it's stupid to even try and compare
Lunsford’s back poses, he’s always leaning towards the judges/audience giving an optical illusion of greater size. Smart posing, actually
this is nothing compared to my Uncle Rico, back in 1982, he would have thrown a Football over some Mountains and won Mr. Olympia too.
what about my muscles Mick? at least you had some muscles...
Derek looked better in 212. He went overboard with the synthol when he went into the open class. Too many guys don’t wanna take the time to put on size nowadays. They want overnight improvements.
No,not even close! Dorian shape and details matched or unrivaled almost 30 years later!!
He has good width but not a lot of depth. Also think he needs to bring his lats up to match the teres major
Big Lenny’s back is as wide as a swimming pool
Let's see Dale's back
@@EpicZadranididn’t respond to the diet
If Dorian was young and competing today he'd just nix those last few weeks of conditioning and come in with greater structure and at least equal conditioning to everyone else.
Damn right! If he came in full like everyone else, he’d be freakin huge
basically 1997 without the tears
Stand up straight so we can have a fair comparison
Phil, Ronnie, Dorian, Kai and prolly several more are better
His upper lat flare might be the best in terms of width but I'm not sure I'd call his back the best, he doesn't have the extreme hardness of a Nick Walker (In the back itself mind you, lower half is impressively hard), he doesn't have the superior cuts and detail of a Michal Krizo and he doesn't have the impressive thickness of a Samson Dauda or Hadi Choopan, with those lower lats hanging of like massive slabs of meat. He is very very good, of that there is no doubt, but I'm hard pressed to call him the best, even of the current top 10.
I also don't like the concave shape of the flare itself as opposed to the more straight or convex shape we generally see from just about anyones elses lat spread, makes it look there's an empty space just covered with skin between upper lats and lower lats where a good deal of meat should be. I'm probably being nitpicky as hell but hey, he's the mr.Olympia so I guess it's his turn.
Ronnie has almost Sampsons height and frame with thickness at or above Hadi. Standing next to Derek, Derek would look like the 202 competitor that he is. 5'5 235 standing bow legged vs a 5'11 300lb guy standing straight up. Then the 300lb guy has more detail to boot lol. the quality is just very different with a lot of these guys (worse). Krizo at least comes in with dry, hard, shapely muscle. Gotta give him that.
@@paulcox2447 Got nothing to object agaist here. Yeah, Krizo def. underrated, don't get why he gets so much flack, the guy has a great physique.
dereks rear lat spread looks so odd
He falls short by not having a very good looking back.
😂all these big guys would still lose to Dorian, nobody has the combination of size with conditioning with symmetry. Only part I see Dorian losing are quads and hamstrings, but then he brings those monster calfs nobody has. I see so many muscle fibers in the back.
casual
No Joel stubbs? Come on man I thought you were a bodybuilding historian!
The most oil in his lats, you mean!
?
Dorian looks so much more lean compared to derek
The Dorian photos are hilarious. He’s further away. Put derek against the best Dorian- the black and white photos. Ur comparing Derek’s current best against Dorian not at his best. Apples
To oranges. Derek would get laughed off stage against any of those 3. Would never win
Should have put Regan up against him dude has great back
The black and white photos from 95 are classics. Kudos who decided to shoot it like that. Everybody was in better shape than what you'd see on the video.
I'm tried of people using the terrible 1995 pictures, 1995 was arguably as conditioned as 1993 if you use the right pictures. Also dorain is most definitely wining in both back poses.
Dorian, Ronnie and Phil are definitely the top 3 best backs ever. Derek is number one if it comes to most overrated Mr Os of recent times lol.
Brandon Curry is 😂
Marx always roots for the underdog. I give Martin the front lat and the an and thigh. Every other pose is Nicks.
Derek has atleast a top 2-3 back with SHIT lighting.
Imagine if you gave him the same lighting as the 90's olympians.
he is not complete and did not win mandatories sad day to see him win...!
u shoulda used 1996 german prix dorian not 1993 olympia
Derek has a top Bdb Pose
1 Phil
2 Ronnie
3 Dorian
4 Derek
Agree
Everybody from that era says that dorian was may more impressive in Person than on pictures. I really like the comparisons, but the guys standing in person next to another would be a whole lot different.
Left out a lot of good backs. Lee Haney, Kai Greene, Flex Lewis, just to name a few
Great video. But where is Lee Haney on this? Always gets overlooked.
For the record on Backs...
1. King
2. Shadow
3. Lee
Bro, Dorian, Phil, Ronnie DEMOLISH Derek The Lump! huR DuR hE's WiDE, come on man. He has no 3d effect, no striations or grainy hard muscle in the back and not nearly as much separation.
What are you smoking MMM
Seems like he wants to 'smoke' Derek.
He lost every single one of these comparisons. I dont even think he has the best back currently much less of all time.
You are just talking out of your ass you don't believe what you said.
It's good to see some sensible people on here giving Derek his props for having one of the best back of all time and for people recognizing Ronnie back was overrated and sloppy. Ronnie is sloppy he looks like a woman, high waist like a woman, over developed glutes like a woman, he couldn't pose he was uncoordinated like a woman. Phil and Derek has the best backs of all times, big and sloppy don't make you have best back i.e. Ronnie.
I’m guessing you wrote this comment at 0:00
Stop the foolishness. Derek has the widest back but not the best back. It's about volume and detail as well. And stop with glutes nonsense too causes they didn't need to flex them in the past.
love your videos. Keep being you❤
Lunsford has a lot of flaws.
Smooth front dbl bi and
Without peaks
No lower lats tied in
Small calves
Back pose here he arches shoulders towards judges
Legs are too short for body and poses like riding a horse
Imo not a pleasing physique
IFBB HALL OF FAME TOP 6 BACKS
💥THE REAL LIST💥
1. Ronnie
2. Phil
3. Derek
4. Dorian
5. Haney
6. Samir
@@immensepowerr You're wrong, but Ok 👌🏼
Hes got alot of width and thickness, but those high lat insertions give his back a concave shape in the lower lat. Compared to dorian it makes his back look
Its a weird thing with Lunsford, he gets really shredded from the back comoared to his soft front and usually that's the really difficult part about conditioning, not the conditioning from the front but from the back. He has a great back, no doubt, but he must be penalized from the front thanks to those lumps in the lats...
we'll see in the next oncoming Olympias, to be honest I did not see Derek winning this year considering he has a lot more room to improve
@@housesports000 I wanted Lunsford to win but I just couldn't see him winning, I mean it was close , really close, but Chopan won most poses imo, I think that politics were the decisive factor, Lunsford becoming more popular and the difficulties they have with dudes like Ramy and Chopan promoting the business...
I dont understand lets say thats oils synthol injections or whatever why do it? it literally looks better without and plus if a guy as genuinely decent as Derek would do that then how many others do it to and again what's the point ?
@@danielhicks4826 Well, Ramy and Chopan were doing it before Lunsford at the open level and they got rewarded three years in a row, so for whatever reason Lunsford is doing i nowt, to improve weaker parts, to look bigger or who knows, I think the real problem is the judges not punishing it...the minute the judges started punishing the bubble gut, dudes began to check it and keep it under control. I mean, you even got Cbum, the supposedly aesthetic representation of this era, with very suspicious looking shoulders and lumps on his quads, and he still gets rewarded...
Didnt cbum have a torn quad though maybe that's why they look strange@@davidzambrano448
Ronnies peaks are just unreal
I really like this channel, and things of this nature
Haney might not be as conditioned, but his lats might be the fullest
What about Joel Stubbs?
Very fanatic of ripped glutes 😢 Derek can't defeat Dorian yates,even in back poses...
Top 7 BEST backs:
7.- Derek Lunsford
6.- Franco Columbu (taking into consideration his era)
5.- Lee Haney
4.- Kai Greene
3.- Phil Heath
2.- Dorian Yates
1.- King Coleman
Dorian wipes the floor with Derek 😂😂😂 what you looking at man 😂😂😂😂
No hate to Derek but I think his 2022 package was more special
Derek is very beatable gifted mr o.
No one is noticing the massive imbalance in ronnie's Backdouble?
Dorian has the best back of all time why do all these people think it's just the standard thing to say that Ronnie Coleman is the best Dorian was 9 and 0 versus Ronnie Coleman Coleman never wins anything if Dorian doesn't retire I just don't understand what these people are seeing Jay Cutler should have beaten Ronnie like four times they just wouldn't give it to him Cutler had him beat three or four times and they didn't give it to him
Check yourself into a mental hospital.
@@zolni3rz you need to check yourself into a mental hospital I would say 75% of the bodybuilding world says Dorian has the best back yet you idiots on these comments sections come on here and kiss Coleman's ass all the time Evan Jay Cutler said that Ronnie's back couldn't touch dorian's this is Jay Cutler saying that so did Chris aceto so did Kevin levrone so did Chris Cormier
2nd best... and possibly best upper traps of all time. No shame to lose to Coleman.
Coleman’s back was soft compared to Dorian’s. Coleman had better upper traps but overall Dorian at his peak had the best back ever
@@Jsizzle6809 exactly and the other thing people forget is that Dorian beat Ronnie every time he ever went against him and let's say in 98 it had been closed and Dorian had won again and Coleman and came out looking like that Dorian would have known the next year to come out not so trimmed down and he would have bought himself up to that level and crushed Coleman all you need to do is look at those black and white pictures where dorian's bigger than Ronnie was ever big that's all you got to do Dorian could have showed up on stage like that and just devastated the competition he still was almost just as dry and he would have destroyed Coleman's best it wouldn't even have been closed Dorian easily could have came to the stage like that
Beating Dorian!? 😂 Marx Max’s medication has been spiked with Fentanyl.
Considering the only shot of the back between Arnold and Derek, Derek's back was beated by EVERYONE on this video.
????
Flex looked better
Dorian looked better
Ronnie forever better
Too small to compare with the past greats
You sound silly Derek is bigger than all of them meaning he has more muscle mass on his bones than them that's how bodybuilding is judged.
Forgetting Momo I see
Nick walker back underrated
No, he doesn't
Dorian smoke all of them
Take a shot every time Marx says the phrase "Things of that nature."
Look at all the bodybuilders calves back in the day, it should be mandatory these days.. I expect to see amazing calves on olympia winner!
Wide doesnt make "best"..Derek lacks a lot over all from the back to front and top to bottom. Not a fan at all..
Where is Flex Lewis? baby please...
As you already mentioned, Derek is as tall as Sandow trophy. With all due respect, he is midget and that is handicap. Bodybuilding regressed.
Spotted the tall insecure little cry-baby boy mad and pounding sand because shorter men dominate tall goofy dudes on stage, you are pathetic.
I always laugh when Mark talks as if he was one of us in the comments. "bUt mArk mArX mUscLe" lol
Dorian 1993
Agreed but I prefer 1995 back even more. The point is……DORIAN
I like dereck but his lats are full of oil .