Jazz Theory 5 Chord Progressions You Need To Recognize and Be Able To Play
Вставка
- Опубліковано 13 чер 2024
- Analyzing Chord progressions is something we all do as Jazz Guitar players. We need to understand Jazz Harmony in order to play good solos and to improve our Jazz Comping.
Here's what most people seem to get wrong: Understanding the chords in the context of the song and not just looking at what type of chord it is.
The way we apply Music Theory to our harmonic analysis of a song decides how well we understand the chord progression and helps us play better solos.
In this video I will go over 5 types of progressions that if you can use to better understand the functional harmony that you find in a jazz standard.
🔴 Subscribe for more free Jazz Guitar Lessons and Videos: bit.ly/JensLessons
☑️ Support me on Patreon: / jenslarsen
✅DOWNLOAD A FREE E-BOOK with 15 II Valt I licks!
Sign up for my newsletter:
jenslarsen.nl/sign-up-for-my-n...
0:02 What we use Music Theory for in jazz
0:23 The II V I problem
1:21 What I want from Music Theory
2:08 Examples of why you want to think beyond "it's a II V I"
2:13 The III VI7 II V I
2:34 Cmaj7 and Em7 both Tonic
3:26 Why Modes fail in Jazz: Phrygian
3:46 IV IVm I and IV bVII I
4:25 Why group in functions?
4:53 V I and II V I progressions
5:36 "Turnaround" the II V I
6:19 Secondary Dom7th and Cadences
8:15 IVm progressions
9:01 Common IVm chords
9:28 The two uses of IVm chords
10:56 The #IV Progressions - The basics
11:31 How #IV progressions are treated in Jazz
11:58 The #IV resolving to a Tonic
13:29 The #IV resolving to IV or IVm
14:47 No Modulations?
15:09 Modulations!
16:03 Examples of songs that modulate
17:10 The point of this way of thinking
My name is Jens Larsen, Danish Jazz Guitarist, and Educator. The videos on this channel will help you explore and enjoy Jazz. Some of it is how to play jazz guitar, but other videos are more on Music Theory like Jazz Chords or advice on how to practice and learn Jazz, on guitar or any other instrument.
The videos are mostly jazz guitar lessons, but also music theory, analysis of songs and videos on jazz guitars.
Edited by Luciano Poli - Business Inquiries: polivideoedit@gmail.com
Facebook: / jenslarsenytlessons
Twitter: / jensljazz
Instagram: / jenslarsenjazz
My Book: Modern Jazz Guitar Concepts: geni.us/Y69J4
My Gear:
www.amazon.com/shop/jenslarsen
Music Notation: www.guitar-pro.com/#ae113
Clip-on Tuner: geni.us/FbPGZg4
Great Safe Gigbag: geni.us/1aH94
SonoCore Strings: 13-53 geni.us/nU3NA3V
Powered Monitor: geni.us/YB8z3X
Headphones: geni.us/fGDhHl
Audio Interface: geni.us/qFIfT
Camera: geni.us/s14DY9v
Lense 1: geni.us/GmM8
Lense 2: geni.us/GJ01Hv
Video Lights: geni.us/wQ8jhSy
Video Lights: geni.us/MWtU
If you want to check out which 3 Scales you need to know for Jazz then take a look here: ua-cam.com/video/NEvBZTD-f6s/v-deo.html 🙂👍
I have by no stretch mastered jazz, but of all the channels on this platform, this one is the best I've found.
Thank you very much! Glad you like the videos!
Absolutely 💯
Mr. Larsen...you, sir, are like an encyclopedia of all things related to jazz guitar. Thank you for this ! The kind of information you bring in such a concise, clear manner would cost thousands of dollars and hundreds of hours in a traditional music school. You are priceless. May you always be blessed with success and good fortune.
thank you for existing!
You're welcome, though it is hard for me to take credit for that, I'll pass it on to my parents! 😀
I’m just a country, folk, and rock player looking to broaden his horizons into jazz. You, sir, have given one of the best primers on functional harmony I’ve ever heard.
Jens...can't thank you enough for sharing your musical knowledge in this way. I find your lessons to be clear and concise. Thank you!
These videos are so good. Pretty much everything I know Jazz, I have from you
Great that you can put it to use! 🙂
Just want to say, you kick all the other guitar youtubers' butts IMO. Just joined on Patreon because I really want to improve and your content kicks butt
Thank you very much Stephen! I am really happy you want to support the channel! I will send you a welcome message on Patreon. Do join the FB group as well if you can 🙂
Hello Mr Larsen
I’ve been viewing your videos as inspiration for expanding my guitar playing past boring shred and cliched blues licks I’ve been playing basically since birth.
Please continue to produce content. You do a good job!
Thank you! Great that you like the videos 🙂
Jens, this lesson is guitar gold. Thanks.
Glad it was useful!
Hi jens, this demonstration is awesome... more of this please!!!!! Grouping chords into FUNCTION!!!
Glad you like it! 🙂
Many thanks for your input as always. Very educational and, more importantly, useful.
Glad it was helpful 🙂
Rare indeed are jazzers who speak (communicate verbally) as well as they play. You're one of them! You should be under UNISCO's protection...cheers!
Thank you very much, Joseph! Really glad to hear that!
Excellent presentation; thank you for sharing.
Thank you very much Jon!
Thanks for laying it out in such a straightforward way, Jens. I think you are one the best jazz guitar teachers on UA-cam right now, especially for students who are a little more advanced and I am learning a ton from you. One thought about this lesson: a great example of the IV minor progression concept is found in Cherokee: the Ab dominant that happens in the 7th measure. It is proceeded by an Eb chord (the IV major). Everybody who solos on Cherokee quickly figures out by ear that the easiest way to accommodate that Ab7 is just to switch from Eb major to Eb minor. For me it’s a really good illustration of the concept and one that always unlocks it for my students.
Thanks James! The IV minor thing is very very common in Standards. The one in Cherokee is indeed very clear like the one in There Will Never Be, It Could Happen, But Not For Me, Stella By Starlight etc.
Excellent! Many thanks Jens!
You're very welcome Pertti! 🙂
This is really useful! Thanks!
Very glad you like it Gabriel!
It's a very good study.
Thank you very much.
You're very welcome! I am glad you like it! 🙂
Thanks Jens!!! You are always stretching me and helping me grow!
Glad to hear it! Keep at it! 🙂
Jume Mowery iii
Is this how you analyze chord progressions as well? Or is yours better? 🤔
Thank you Jens!
One question - so there is only one way to use chord progression?- when you improvise (playing solo) no need to play every chord, if you see chord progression you can improvize on root chord only? Is it possible to use chord progression as substitution of long lasting chord? For example I have |C|C| - can I easy replace it with |C Dm|G7C| or with |CFmaj|F#dimC|?
Very often I can see that jazz musicians sing along with playing (Andrea Oberg: ua-cam.com/video/QnITpsh42Ks/v-deo.html).
How to do it? How to get prehearing of what you will play in next second? Can you make video in this topic?
He surely knows this licks well and just recreates them (mby slightly changing) or/and sings what he hears from this guitar. This singing may be very helpful in other ways such as expression or satisfaction of the player.
@@satchrules101 You can play the E if you would like but Jens tends to navigate towards more interesting and more strongly defining notes.
Music. Ooo I can answer that: The 5th is not necessary to define a major or minor chord. Only the root, 3rd and 7th is necessary
Dude, you are awesome. Much thanks.
You're very welcome! I am glad you like it! 🙂
AMAZING INFO...BIG THANKS..🎸🎶✨🥂
Glad it was helpful!
I genuinely love watching your subscribers grow. You deserve it!! You are one of the best on UA-cam!
Thank you Chris! Very nice of you to say so! I am glad that people opt in to see more as well! 🙂
Jens, you are the Stephen Hawking of the guitar world and beyond :) So much information in all your videos and i just wish i had started when i was younger. Not so much time now to learn this immense amount but i soldier on :)
+mark robins Haha Thank you! I don't think my contribution is really find ingen new things as it is passing on what is already there. But I appreciate the compliment!
It is never too late to check out new things!keep at it! ☺️
I can’t believe I haven’t seen this video so far, being subscribed to this channel for a long while now!
Mr. Larsen, you have probably made THE best jazz progression video in the world here! This clarifies a lot of the confusion that beginner and intermediate jazz players face while looking at some songs.
Thanks very much for doing this.
Thank you very much! I made this study guide a while back, you might find that useful: jenslarsen.nl/how-to-analyze-songs-music-theory-and-functional-harmony/
I cannot thank you enough Mr. Larsen! You really put these concepts in ways that are understandable and not intimidating! Such a great teacher!
You're very welcome, Philip! Great to hear that you find the videos useful!
haha.......freaky .......just put on reading glasses and the blue letters were very 3D on that red back ground ...haha ha....very cool Mr Larsen .ps -the arps and triad stuff from your other vids is really helping ..thanks
😁 Thanks :)
Great lesson!
Thank you! :)
excellent video!
+renaud charbonneau ryffranck Thank you very much Renaud!
thnx for the lesson...
You're very welcome! I am glad you like it! 🙂
Thank you so much again, Jens. Riffs are spilling out of my guitar just listening to you play/speak for a few minutes. Please always keep doing what you're doing. You're an asset to the cause!
Thank you Daniel! I am glad you can convert it to music! 🙂
I don't think you would consider it music! But it's exciting to learn such new tricks. Utmost respect; you light the way.
Wouldn't have had the confidence to really start practicing jazz guitar without you Jens! You're single handedly one of the most positive things about the internet
Thank you, very much
You're very welcome! :)
Thanks!
Thank you for the support 🙂
Buenisima clase Saludos!!!
Thank you Andres Urrea I am glad you found it useful! 👍
Thanks Jens, great lesson. Impressed by the way you pulled out of your brain the tunes that exemplified the theory.
Thank you Ken! I guess it also has to do with how I learned the theory in the first place 🙂
Excelent excelent..!!i learn so much ..thank you for translation to spanish.!!saludos
You're very welcome! I am glad you like it! 🙂
really useful device to better understand what we play
Thank you! 🙂 Glad you like it!
Your videos are so helpful, really appreciate all of this knowledge!
Thank you! That's really great to hear 🙂
exactly what I needed, great lesson here!!!
Thank you Wayne! Glad to hear that!
You are a brilliant teacher, thank you so much!
You are very welcome! I am glad you like the videos!
I know this isn't the subject of the video BUT, your guitar has Wonderful Intonation......
+The Erod1944 Channel Thank you! It's only when the strings are not worn out!
The best channel to learn jazz and more...thanks master Larsen.
Thank you very much, Enrique 🙂
I always watch your videos on speaker, so my wife is like, who is Jens Larsen?! lol😉👍👍
Really, thank you VERY much for all of your hard work!!😄👍👍
Haha! Hope I am not driving your wife nuts :)
this was a great video, been watching for awhile but just got back into learning a little more on jazz taking it piece by piece but gives a better understanding of some of the standards I've been working on ! (actually wrote everything down aha!) Thanks Jens!!
Thank you Curtis! I am glad you find it useful and can put it to use! That makes it worthwhile to make this stuff in the first place!
That was a very nice lesson Jens!! Get to learn a great deal from your videos :)
Thanks for doing what you do..
+Jerson Anthony Thank you Jerson! I am glad you found the video's useful!
BOOOOOOOOOOOO
Best Jazz Lessons on you tube so far .. but not for beginners. Great teacher !!
Thank you! 🙂
good one....
Thank you!
Gracias por traducir!!!
You're very welcome! I have Spanish translations of these videos: ua-cam.com/video/mLmuA3KNAq8/v-deo.html&list=PLWYuNvZPqqcEuDRNUmMFc5hqrxk6tP3fO&index=1
Share them and help me spread the word!
Your videos have helped me so much man. Thanks for your content.
So as I understand it:
There are different ways of getting back to the tonic other than II-V.
tonic: IM, iii7, vi7.
subdominant: ii7, IVM7, vi7.
dominant: V7, bII7
"IV minor": iv, bVII7, ii7b5, bVIM7 or bIIM7. These chords usually lead to dominants or tonic.
"#IV": biii dim, #iv dim, #iv7b5, vii7b5-IIIalt. These chords usually lead to tonics or subdominants.
Modulations: up M3, down M3 are common examples.
I appreciate this video and have just subscribed. I am trying to sharpen my ears and "hear the bigger picture" with chord changes and this is helpful to that end.
+emmoiv Yes! There are more ways to resolve to the tonic than through a dominant. Glad you like the video ☺️
I edited my post to include the tonic, subdominant and dominant functions. Are there any common chords that fill these roles that I left out?
Also: a bit more complicated:
What functions do year hear in bars 7-10 of "I Fall in Love too Easily"?
VII7-IValt / III7 / #ivm7b5-VIIalt / III7
Is this III7 sort of a tonic here?
I appreciate any response, thank you for your teaching.
+emmoiv Looks pretty ok. The VI chord can actually be both tonic and subdominant ☺️
You really gave me insight on my jazz guitar assignment from my instructor so I subscribed! You explained something at timeline 14:16 in your video. I have this assignment where i'm learning composition basics. I have to write a "melody" over patterns that my instructor uses often such as starting backwards with your end chord or root "C" for example and going to G-D-A-E-B-F# (BACKWARDS) to achieve the pattern. Played forward it is of course F#-B-E-A-D-G-C. We also talked about the use of tritones or b5. Can you or anyone here offer any insight as to what this is about? I kind of get it and I hear it. I'm trying to learn chord melodies and comping. Thank You very much.
I think the great thing you did in this video was link the changes to specific jazz standards. As soon as you played m7b5 m7 I thought “bridge, ‘Night and Day’ “ It’s really useful to be ‘hear’ the changes in the context of tunes rather than in the abstract
Great! That is exactly what it should be :)
Coming from someone who just plays and has no idea what Jazz actually is (too ignorant to assume to know the difference) all I know is that these concepts does not only apply to jazz but in generally all western music.
Your lessons in diatonic Chord progressions have been a godsend and is the only one I've seen so far that has M7/m7 progressions instead of the same major/minor ones, which led me here.
That said, I have a rather dumb question:
Why do the topics only cover Maj7? Is it pointless to talk about Minor chord progressions knowing that one can always substitute VI as the I for the minor version? Sorry for the dumb question.
Thank you 🙂 Because minor keys are more complex to an audience who have been spoonfed modes and chord scale theory.
Very good types of chords progressions brother.....excellent presentation!!!!
Thank you! Glad you like it1
Nice new thumbnail! Another great lesson, Jens. And you are right, there is quite a lot of material. I like the new video effects too.
+Dan Urbach Thank you Dan! Yes, I was trying to expand a bit on my video editing chops 😁
thank you very much. This information isnt easy to find if you dont know exactly what you're looking for.
You're very welcome! I am glad you like it! 🙂
I seen some/alot of your videos Jens, and wow! your awesome! Thanks a million! :D
You're very welcome, Allan! :)
thanks for posting. Your thought process on what to learn is really helping me build a better foundation on music and giving me a direction to improve as a guitarist. Thanks. From the Yukon Brian.
Very helpful, refreshing my theoretic knowledge after a few years and learning some new.
Thank you Hans! 🙂 Gald you found it useful!
I enjoy your teaching style. Is that a Yamaha SA2000? Beautiful tone. I see the SG2000 on the wall.
Thanks Tim! It's an Ibanez AS2630., but the one on the wall is indeed a Yamaha, though it is an SG1000 🙂
Good
Thank you 🙂
Please do a video about how to internalize theory so you can play freely. To free yourself from theory once you have learned it..... How to train your ear to play intuitively to be able to react to cords while soloing without having to think about theory... Hope you understand what I'm getting at. Thx
That's pretty simple. You don't think about theory when you play, you do that while you practice. Once you know the piece you improvise over you don't have to think about the theory.
funny how the background noise stops at 15:09.
nice video! thnx for sharing
Thanks! That's the fan in my lights that go on and off. I have since found a noise-reduction plugin that fixes that issue (well almost..)
Could you please do a series on this? I am intrigued but all this is still not clear to me in terms of the groupings and how to treat them what to play and what not to play.
Maybe I will, though the best way to really learn this is to learn and analyze songs. That way you really learn in the real context that it exists, so if you know a lot of songs then analyze them and if not: start working on learning songs 🙂
Hi Jens,
Can you make a lesson to talk more about #VI progression?
+Yau Cheuk Fai I think I already have a few if you search the channel ☺️
Hi jens, I subscribe to your analysis of hearing function and applying chord or target notes based on that!!! Love your ear/ mind approach. Would love to know your thoughts on Diads. Understanding them better? Any thoughts you would have?
Diads? They are even more context sensitive than chords and can only be analyzed in a context.
Hello Mr. Larsen Thank you for sharing your knowledge. God Always Bless you.
You are very welcome
I am absolutely shocked that you are giving this away for free. Thank you, sir.
No worries Jay! Make some music and make the world a better place :)
This lesson is especially helpful, speaking personally since I am a chord guy. I find that if I can find my way through a tune with the chords I can generally find the melody within the chords.
Jens - thanks for another great discussion. The only place I differ with you is in the #4 category. I would call virtually all diminished chords in standards chromatic passing chords. Almost all provide chromatic root movement between chords a major second apart (IM: #1dim: iim7 or iim7:#ii dim: iiim7) or between the root of one chord and a chord with a non-root in the bass (IVM: #4 dim: IM/5 in bass). Some of them have a #IV in the chord, and some don't. I've seen the ones that move up chromatically called Dom7 b9 with the root removed, and the 3rd in the bass, which makes sense (C# dim = A7 b9), but that doesn't account for the examples that don't go up a major 2nd.
Maybe I think of it this way because it's so similar to using dim chords to harmonize non-chord tones in arranging. And since we're talking about function categories, I don't see any functional significance to the #IV - it just happens to show up in some cases, as does the b III. Obviously, if it works for you, there must be something to it - just a different way to see the same thing.
Sure! You're very welcome!
A few thoughts on this:
- Does it make sense to say a chord that covers a whole bar (and a whole phrase of the melody) is the same as the chord that is inserted when harmonizing a non chord tone in an 8th note line, and then conclude that it has no function?
- Calling something a chromatic passing chord is not giving it a function, it can be any type of chord resolving up or down
- The #1 dim chord is a dominant (as you say yourself) the #IV dim chords are the ones that are not dominant..
- the bIII dim is a #IV in inversion
- If you want to hear #IV then listen to the 2nd bar of I Remember You or the original chord in the beginning of Stella.
Could you please try to say this phrase out loud: " I don't see any functional significance to the #IV - it just happens to show up in some cases, as does the b III."
and then replace the #IV with V and the bIII with V of V, then you can hear how it sounds to me 😀
Jens - first, there's no reason to get snippy with your responses. I've made a musical point, which may be right or wrong, but I did so in good faith, to engage with your commenters and yourself.
That being said, when I said that I don't see any functional significance in the #4, I'm referring to the #4 interval of the major key. My point is that in a symmetrical chord like the diminished, it can be inverted without changing the function. Thus, a #4 diminished chord is at the same time a 6 dim, and a 1 dim, and a b3 dim.
Regarding whether or not a chromatic passing chord has a function or not, you must have a different understanding of the word function than I do. In C-C#dim-Dm7 or Dm7-Ebdim-Em7 or FM7-F#dim-G7 or any of those progressions in descending order, the dim chord serves a function - it adds color to the progression and provides chromatic movement in the bass line. This is the standard use of the dim chord in popular song writing through much of the 20th century. To pick out the F#dim chord in the third progression above and call it a different function than the first - which has no #4 in it - makes no sense to me. It's usage that defines function, not theory books, and this is, in fact, how the dim chord has been used in hundreds of songs. While the particular 4-#4-1 progression is a rare one, and fits perfectly into my function group - the #4 root moves chromatically to the 5 of the tonic chord.
Thanks for reading and responding.
Sorry, I was just trying to be clear, not offend you?
A function in harmony is usually that the chord belongs to a group of chords that sound and act similar, so in C major, C, Em and Am are all tonic (in most cases anyway) and G7 and Bdim are dominant.
In your progression the F# dim is working as a (secondary) dominant so it is not a #IV chord. In fact you don't have any #IV dim chords in there, they are all dominants and resolving like dominants.
Maybe that is the difference you don't see/hear: the #IV resolves differently since it can resolve directly to I or down to a IV chord (as bIIIdim to II)
It's like this: F#dim G7 is really just V I. But F#dim Fm6 is #IV IVm and F#dim C is #IVdim I The last two are very different from the first one to my ears? And surely just as common, in fact dim chords in jazz are not that often dominant and much more often subdominant now that I think about it.
Jens Larsen This was a very interesting thread to me, for two reasons. To begin with, the question and subsequent exchange I found quite useful in understanding how even accomplished and experienced musicians may differ in their understanding and use of some fundamental terms, such as "function". For example, being new to guitar and music theory but having immersed myself in the latter over the past year, whenever I read the word "function" in a discussion like this, my mind immediately goes to "functional harmony". This exchange usefully underlies a conclusion I had already come to, after watching countless theory tutorials: musicians often use the same words to mean different things...Sometimes the difference is trivial and other times it is more fundamental and doesn't always lead to good things (or feelings). Like you, I interpreted the word "function" as relating to "functional harmony" and therefore read your reply as a simple clarification, free of any disrespectful connotation. So reading the reply, and reaction, surprised me until I understood the more generic use of the term "function" implied but later explained by the person asking the question and everything fell into place...you both presumed a "common usage" which wasn't quite there. Learned from the two of you, as I understood both pov's. Your last answer will definitely send me to my desk to make sure my grasp isn't purely that of a student blindly agreeing with his teacher.
Jens - First, thank you for sharing! I always learn something from you. Now, here’s a touchy question: Assuming it’s copyrighted, would you be averse to analyzing and explaining your tune “Top Dog”? I really like the tune, and would like to know how you went about composing it.
Thanks! That's not really a touchy question I guess? Top Dog is of course copyrighted :) I could probably analyze it but I can't tell you how I wrote it because I don't remember, it was in 2002 or 2003 when I was still studying. I remember bringing it to a gig with a band and we only played it once because it was too difficult.
I am not sure that an analysis of a tune like that makes too much sense? It is in a key, but it is out of the key as much as it is in it?Most of my music is actually like that.
Hi Jens, is there a reason why you write «Eb dim» and not «Eb o»? Same with «Cmaj7» and «CΔ»?
Those symbols are often not included in the font in my video editor. So they are not that easy to get to
I am terrible at theory, but I love your videos because I know when I get to this point I will have a great video to go back over these ideas. I can already tell that you speak very well about this topic which you know a lot about. Thank you for the great explanations.
Thank you so much! I am really glad that you find the explanations useful! 🙂
I agree.
I sincerely thank u for your great efforts and time on those so many tutorial lessons!
But I wanna ask u one question here regarding the IVm chord type, I just don't understand how to formulate it since I saw FMaj7 can go to Fm7 or Bb7 or AbMaj7, but why? Could u pls explain it more specifically? Thx so much first!
It is about the leading notes, A going to Ab to G.
Instead of looking for theoretical way of understanding you will probably get more out of recognizing it in the songs you know and play 🙂
Hi, Jens. Nice video (as always)! I just did not understand the reason you called IVm progression and not just Im progression, since most chords proposed (Bb7, Abmaj7, D°, etc) belongs in Cm but not in Fm. Thanks.
That is because they are subdominant chords, not tonic chords 🙂
Hi Jens. I love your videos. I’m trying to improve my Jazz Theory a little more So a question on the #IV bit. When you say that the progression FMAJ7/ Bm7b5/ E7b9/ FMAJ7 is a minor II-V on the #IV I’m a little puzzled. When you say minor II-V are you meaning from F minor? (Harmonic/Melodic/Natural??) I can see by raising the IV to B from Bb we can create a Bm7b5 from F Melodic Minor but where does the E7b9 come from? In all F minor scenarios, the G is natural meaning the third of E7 is wrong? Please forgive me if I’m completely barking up the wrong tree 🤯
Hi Matt, I mean Minor II V as in IIø V7(b9). It has nothing to do with F melodic minor. It is a reharmonized G# or Ab dim chord, and the scale you would use over that would be A harmonic minor which is also the scale that is associated with the II V.
Thanks Jens. But where or what is the #IV? I understand that Bm7b5 then E7b9 is II -V in A Harmonic minor but where does that come from. What’s it getting at? This is Key of F right. Again, apologies for my confusion..
Isn't the #IV in this video? #IV is a B something chord in F.
Hi Jens. Sorry I don’t understand your last reply.
So are you saying that the Bm7b5 is the #4 chord in F? Because if you move a fourth up in F, it’s Bb? I’m just struggling to understand why we borrow min II-V from A Harmonic minor.. Thanks for your patience 🙂
Hi! You said 3,6,2,5
But you played A7 not Am7.
I recognize that this is a common Jazz alteration, however, let’s consider the Em7 in this context (key of C);
If you consider as diatonic, you would play Phrygian
If you consider it as part of a ii,V in (temporarily) D, you would play Dorian
If you consider it as a ii/ii to V/ii you would play Dorian flat 2
Aarrgh!!!
Would love your opinion.
Also, would love to see a video detailing a variety of common jazz cadences ( back door ii V, secondary dom, etc) several songs that use them and the chord scale relationships which are commonly used for each cadence.
Thank you.
Great channel!
Phrygian is a horrible way to describe the III chord in major. That is just not how it sounds. If you want to hear phrygian then play a sus4(b9) chord, that is a completely different sound.
I have a few videos on common progressions:
There is a section in my latest video: ua-cam.com/video/msmdbxsjmvI/v-deo.html
But also a lot in this video: ua-cam.com/video/NEvBZTD-f6s/v-deo.html
@@JensLarsen yes! That first video was amazing (already saw it) Would love to see an extended version including standards/application for each cadence and their chord/scale relationships. Is there a resource you would recommend for this? Thanks!🇨🇦
@@anthonysilva5312 Actually, if you want to benefit from that, then you really need to learn the songs. If it superficial it is not going to be very useful, and you will learn 1000x as much if you check out the songs and get them into your system. It would also free you from all the chord/scale nonsense that you seem to be stuck in, that is just not where the music is 😁
@@JensLarsen thx
Great explanation of the #IV stuff. (And I like the fact that that #IV is showing up as a hash tag on the video description, lol. )
How would you approach Yesterday...which goes from F major to Em ..to the A7 to Dm to Bb finally...he ( Mc Cartney ) seems to use little 11 V 1's like in You Never Give Me your Money.
Can you reference some pop that uses jazz as a bridge to higher level jazz that you know?
Yesterday just has a cadence to VI, hardly far out? McCartney listened a lot to show tunes which are also the foundation of jazz standards.
I don't know what you mean with higher level jazz and pop music?
@@JensLarsen I mean I don't know it Jazz....but I see the walk up and was curious about the bit.approaching and improv over them_ From Em to A7 to Dm...to finally Bb the IV
I've learnt the song for covers but not to improv over.
I see what you say now with Showtunes and Jazz similarities.
One of the things I have learned from your videos is there is a lot to learn. However I am trying to break it down to the simplest elements and learn one concept at a time.
Inspired by this video I have been considering the chord progressions of the few standards I can play more closely. Would the diminished chord in the turnaround of Donna Lee be considered as a #IV? Furthermore, as the root features in the diminished chord of the #IV, is it helpful or not to consider these chords as simply the diminished chord of the root?
Hallo Jens.
Hi Peter :)
I like the contextual approach, that's very helpful to think like that. But the neapolitan subdominant (minor chord with b6 in the bass) killed me :)
Thanks Jan! Glad you liked it!
So in a song like Lady Bird where it goes Cmaj Fm Bb7 back to the tonic are you saying you don't think of the Fm Bb7 as a modulation to Ab but that your still thinking of playing in Cmaj?
+Phil Lenowsky I take it you mean Eb? Playing another scale is not the same as modulating. It isn't a modulation in Cmaj7 A7b9 Dm7 G7 either.
Sometimes called the “Backdoor ii-V” or “Backdoor Turnaround.”
This was a really lovely lesson! I got a bit lost on the #IV discussion, but I'll be watching that a couple times again to see if I can get it.
Thank you very much Regi! Glad to hear that. You're right the #IV stuff is often not really recognized so it can be a bit hard to figure out.
If you play the Harmonic MAJOR...it'll help.
Lets say you're over A minor as a guiding tonic.
A Lydian b3....( A melodic minor with #4)
If you play II. V I ...from A lydian b3
B7...Emaj7...A min..
You can also play the A as FULL diminished or E as Augmented.
The #4 turns the B into a dominant ( mix b2)
D# locrian bb7....F# dorian b5
or you can play II, V, I in A melodic minor
B min....E7...A min...
You can still play the G#, C. E as augment
Modulate to A harmonic or into A natural minor
You can also modulate from the E Harmonic Major to C# harmonic minor
Then it'll just be D# Locrian maj6
Play C dim or C augment into C# minor or C# melodic minor.
Play the D# as Minor or ( dorian b2).lmao into E MAJ maj7 or Augments...
Then play the C# as harmonic minor b2 or melodic minor b2
Play the D as Maj. Maj7. Dominant or dim.lmao
D min...G7 into C minor.....melodic minor
Dmin....G7 into C MAJOR...lol
If you play C min....F7 G7
You can play the F7 as lydian dominant or (mix #2, #4)
I hope that makes sense...why I chose F hungerian MAJOR
You can alter that chord from Maj or min via the A harmonic minor
Now. it'll simply turn it into a DOMINANT as well....
You can still play FULL diminished from it too....
1, #2, #4, 6 is still all minor intervals.
while in C MAJOR...
If you barr at the 10th fret...D . G. C...
keys are just pitch E, A, D.....V, I. IV or I. IV V
at the nut or 12th fret.
The II is perfect 5th from the V...
it gets inverted.
Anyway...warping the Lydian
Lydian #2
Lydian b3
Lydian b7
Lydian #2, b7 ( hungarian MAJOR)
Dorian #4
Dorain b2, #4
Ion...#5
ion...#4. #5
Ion #2, #4, #5
Ion b3 #5
The last mode of Hangerian major is....Ion #3. #4, #5..lmao
The II mode is locrain b4, bb6, bb7
The III mode is Hamonic minor b5
The double harmonic minor is - harmonic minor #4
If you align these 5 parallel scales from the minor count or A as the tonic.
The #IV is LOCRIAN bb7.....from the A lydian b3 or VII of E harmonic MAJOR
The bV = ion #3. #4, #5........from the A harmonic minor b5 or F hungarian MAJOR
The b VI is lydian #2
Then it pushes up to Maj VI = aeo b5 or dorian b5
Then the bvii mixolydian
Then LEADING tone modes ( 4 ea)
Locrian b4, bb7
locrian b4
phrygain b4
locrian b4, bb6. bb7
+OneEyE Monster That's a very long post, I am not sure those are very helpful? Did you realize that in this context #IV is something else?
#4 is just a tritone...what context are you referring to?
KEYS are just PITCH
from C to F#....i can play F# aeo b5 or F# dorian b5
The #IV chord of A lydian b3 is D# locrian bb7
or F# locrian bb7 into G Harmonic Major. from C lydian b3
what other # 4 chord are you speaking of????
WHERE are YOU COUNTING FROM as a reference to make it a #4
#4 from WHAT.... the TONIC ?????
When you use ROMANS...it's from the TONIC
WHAT #4 chord are there from the TONIC????
The #4 from the double harmonic minor????
Whole Tone , aux FULL DIMINISHED (WH/HW) or Messiani modes ???
I am referring to the context of the video. The #IV is not an interval there, it is a group of chords. All your scale references are completely off topic.
Fascinating concepts covered in this video! I will continue to hash through iiVI's for now and I think soon enough get to the Secondary Dominant idea.
I found this week's video very interesting. I didn't really start thinking about harmonic progression within songs in relation to a key centre or 'home' until I'd been playing standards for some years. Mostly I just looked at a chord and thought, "Oh a VI7. So I'm in II major. Noodle noodle noodle. Oh, a II7. So I'm in V major. Noodle noodle noodle.." This approach treated each chord as a kind of isolated unit, and while it was useful, and functional, it was also somewhat limiting. Partly this came from traditional SATB exercises, and partly -- I'm sorry to say -- from the Abersold catalogue, which seemed to be telling me there was a 'correct' scale for every chord and you only had to learn them and run up and down them to play jazz. Noodle noodle noodle.
I would also say that things really expanded harmonically for me when I started doing more transcriptions and noticing how other musicians were navigating the structure of a tune; where they were 'in' or 'out' in relation to a chord or a block of II-Vs and where they were 'in' or 'out' in relation to the key centre. Dexter Gordon was a master at this - always finding exactly the right wrong notes!
Anyway, I really like Jens' Monday morning explanations. This is really clear and straight forward. Jazzers, take note! :-D
I think it is true that a lot of us learn our CHord-Scale relationships and then start trying to understand music and progressions later.
Glad you like the Monday videos :)
This is a really deep video. Do you have any videos that spend more time on the minor IV progression and how we can play over it and think about it?
Thanks Joel! Most of the thinking is covered in this video, but I do have a video on modal interchange that also discusses this topic in more detail
Jens Larsen thanks! I also just watched the one you did like 5 years ago. It’s cool-I had never seen before how the backdoor and that iv are so similar.
Hello Jens, thank you for all your informative videos. What is the source of the scores published in your videos ? Are they from the "real book" ? Which one ? Thanks for your reply.
Can you give me a time in this video? Then I can have a look :)
Thanks. Good lesson. Will you get a chance to put this lesson in a readable form-pdf? I'm working my way through Mark Levine's Jazz Theory Book (which is excellent), so it's good to have your lessons to mix in with that book. Helpful.
+Corey B Glad you like it Corey! ☺️ I would like to write a theory book, but I doubt I will have the time soon. But I am of course flattered that you ask!
Thank you! I am a bassist really helpful?
No problem!
The #iv° could be seen as :
-A rootless V/V borrowed from the dominant key resolving to either V, V(c) or I(b). It could then be extended to be a dim7, or a min7(b5) chord if we either want the V/V chord to have a minor or a major 9th.
-The diminished two of a minor ii°-V-I, resolving to the the iii of a given major scale, or elsewhere if justified by voice leading. One could also resolve it to the I instead of the iii, since it implies doing a ii°-V-bVI in the key of the iii.
It could then be extended as a min7(b5) chord.
This is also a less obvious way to harmonize the vii degree of a major scale than considerating it as the leading tone of the V resolving to the tonic.
-A rootless b9 dominant chord built either on the 2nd degree (as mentionned above), or on the iv, bvi or vii degrees, if the #iv is extended as a dim7 chord. Each note of a diminished 7th chord can be the leading tone of a dominant chord, which results in the list above.
Then, these rootless dominant chords can resolve as expected, or resolve elsewhere by voice leading such as going from iii to #ii dim7 (which is the enharmonic of #iv dim7) to ii. Here the #ii dim7 is a rootless VII dom7(b9), but instead of resolving to the iii as expected, it goes by voice leading to the ii (which would be the bVII in the key of the iii).
But that is not how it sounds or how it voice-leads so it is not a very good description.
@@JensLarsen Hello Jens ! Thanks for your videos which helps me learn a lot :)
Could you tell me about which of the 3 uses of the #iv° you are takling about ? Sorry but i did post the comment before finishing it so i modified it by places :)
@@martialpanyvino No worries! It is the same for all of them. The problem is that you want to explain them as something that doesn't fit with how they act in the music, and how they sound. Forcing everything to be V I is anyway boring (if you think about it). Don't be afraid of a subdominant chord, those do exist 😁
@@JensLarsen I know there are perfect gestures being :
V - I (Perfect cadence)
bII - I (Tritone Sub)
bVII - I (Backdoor cadence)
And plagual gestures such as :
IV - I (plagual cadence)
iv - I (minor plagual cadence)
iimin7 - I
iimin7(b5) - I
And i know any of these gestures could resolve to other chords that the I, either respecting the movements implied by notes like the leading tone or not.
So when analysing a chord progression i always try to find these gestures wether the chords are diatonic or borrowed, because then i understand how the harmony functions.
However i know harmony doesn't have to function ! In modal harmony, such strong gestures are avoided to prevent establishing a clear sens of tonality. Is it what you are thinking about when telling me everything doesn't have to be a V - I ?
Also, even when analysing predominant chords such as vii° - iii - vi - ii, the fifths relation between their roots mirorrs the V - I gesture.
There are surely other examples which would miror other gestures but then i don't see what is wrong with using such gestures as a tool to analyse when it is possible ?
@@martialpanyvino You are trying to listen with your eyes and not taking into consideration how this works in the songs. That is what I am telling you. This is not a description of the music.
If it is a subdominant tonic resolution then it is weird to go out of your way to invent stuff to force it to be a V I. Especially when it means inventing sounds that don't really exist in the music like a V of V with a b9 in a major key. That is pretty rare(I can't even think of an example) in the songs.
So if you really want to learn theory then learn a lot of songs and explain what is in the songs, don't look at a single chord and try to imagine how it works.
I going, to be honest, I'm ok on guitar but my ear sucks .I;m not a young man but I still have the drive and want to learn about chords and how to hear them when I'm breaking down songs .i still can't hear it right but even tho I'm not that good I keep getting better every year. I guess one day I won't be able to move my fingers but right now I still can. What should I do so I can just hear a chord and know where and what to play?Sorry for bothering you,but I would like to have a better more workable ear.
Hi Tony,
That's difficult to answer in a UA-cam comment, there are many ways. If you are expecting just to hear great lines that you then can play then, that is never going to happen. You will always feel like you worked for what you play in some way or other.
That said. Keep trying to play. Spend time composing lines, that way your ear has time to find the notes and you can figure out if you need to work on other things in order to be able at hearing better lines.
And then do the other stuff like singing from sheet music with only the root note as a reference, transcribing songs and solos etc.
Hope that helps a bit 🙂
Well organized and enjoyable. Question/recommendation: Add a staff, in addition to the notes in letters. It helps to see the big picture, imo.
+Yves Le Goff Thank you Yves! I will keep that in mind, though my editing skills are somewhat limited ☺️
Hey, thanks a lot ! I'm not really a beginner neither in theory and jazz but I never realized that the F∆ Bb7 C∆ was in fact a classic F F- C, wich seem to be quite obvious for me now. New sbuscriber ! :D
+Adrien Bidal Thank you Adrien! I hope you find more stuff you can use ☺️
Hi,
What about molldur? Because I learned in my classes that the Fm in C is actually a molldur scale?
Grt
Evrim
That is the IVm chords I talk about in this video.
@@JensLarsen Yes I see and that's why I asked. Because you don't name it as a molldur. It's not a big deal maybe how it's called :). By the way I am really gratefull to have response from you. Best regards. Grt
@@baglama00 That is a German name, as far as I know, it is only used in Germany and Sometimes the Netherlands (the expression makes sense in German, but not in English, Dutch, French etc)
@@JensLarsen Yes it was in the Netherlands. But anyway. Thanks a lot. 🙏🏻
@@baglama00 Then you see why I don't use that name right?
Brilliant lesson, Jens. It seems to me the #IV is similar to a secondary dominant, i.e. more like a secondary tritone... and still often essentially just a passing chord to some subdominant, or maybe to the tonic. It seems different from the VIm, which can flow to the V7 in a way that's really nice - i.e. different. The #IV somehow just sounds like a chromatic passing chord, like a dim or something. Great food for thought! :-)
Thanks Philip. I guess the #IV is essentially a passing chord in the same way the IVm or a V is or not? The only reason you don't take the #IV to a V chord is that then it is an auxiliary dominant and not a subdominant.
Maybe check out some songs that it is in and get used to hearing it. that will probably make you more able to hear it for what it is and not a passing chord?
Would you consider a song with the A part in Em and the B part in G major to be a modulation? (My instinct is that even though the key signature the the same, the tonal center has moved)
That depends on how you hear it. Sometime it really sounds like a modulation and sometimes it just sounds like the song is moving around in the diatonic chords. There are often more than one way to analyze something like that.
👍👍👍