I prefer a light. I have a 1500 lumen light on my pistol that allows me to see my sights at night and it allows me to have impressive affect on my target before I even get a round off. Although lasers are helpful, lights are where it's at in terms of tactical use. Plus, if we're talking about a conflict in the dark (home invasion, theatre shooting, etc.) you should and have to be able to see your target to shoot it. And with a powerful enough light, not only can you completely immobilize someone by temporarily blinding them with light, but you'll know who you're about to put a round off on. For legal reasons, that's very important.
@@geetsfeetgaming859 Agreed, although I'm not big on the whole eye blinding light unless you are using it on a rifle. The blinding effect is way overrated, a person can still shoot you by just targeting the light spot (has happened many times in force on force training). 200 lumen is perfectly fine for me out to 50 yards. I don't have legal justification to shoot much beyond 15 yards anyways. Even the Army only specified like sub 300 lumen for their M17 handgun weapon system. My handheld is 1000 lumen though, to search a wider range.
Of course. You'd think more people would "get it". I've had Crimson Trace Laser Grips on my M&P's forever.
I prefer a light. I have a 1500 lumen light on my pistol that allows me to see my sights at night and it allows me to have impressive affect on my target before I even get a round off. Although lasers are helpful, lights are where it's at in terms of tactical use. Plus, if we're talking about a conflict in the dark (home invasion, theatre shooting, etc.) you should and have to be able to see your target to shoot it. And with a powerful enough light, not only can you completely immobilize someone by temporarily blinding them with light, but you'll know who you're about to put a round off on. For legal reasons, that's very important.
Me to man love my 2.0...
@@geetsfeetgaming859 Agreed, although I'm not big on the whole eye blinding light unless you are using it on a rifle. The blinding effect is way overrated, a person can still shoot you by just targeting the light spot (has happened many times in force on force training). 200 lumen is perfectly fine for me out to 50 yards. I don't have legal justification to shoot much beyond 15 yards anyways. Even the Army only specified like sub 300 lumen for their M17 handgun weapon system. My handheld is 1000 lumen though, to search a wider range.
My walther p22 does have any real mounting system for a red dot...so I've been thinking about a green dot laser...this video has me sold
Lasers for home defence!
In a real world scenario use your x-ray vision to look through walls hahaha!!!
Yup, right on point !! Hide and shoot !!
So why did he have to tell the lady to use both hands with the laser when the guys didn’t??
What is with the weird grip, with the weak hand finger almost inside the trigger guard?
Moses Fridman the lady obviously doesn’t shoot much at all...
@@rec0il_179 Could it be no one showed her how to shoot and hold a gun? You can tell she is holding high if you look at the video.
Acceptable but could be better all in the A zone
I hope you all realize how rigged this is, lasers don't just magically make you a better shot, if they did everyone would use them.
I'm sorry you think this was rigged. What you see is what we filmed.
How don’t lasers make people better shooters? You don’t think something assisting you in seeing exactly where your shot is going to go doesn’t?
In a life or death situation, you'll be thankful to have every bit of sight assistance you can get rather than relying solely on your eyesight.
Rigged? Are you stupid??
*looks at the price of lasers*