Firebase has SQL: Introducing Data Connect
Вставка
- Опубліковано 27 вер 2024
- Learn how you can now use relational data from Postgres Cloud SQL in your client-side applications with a type-safe auto-generated SDK by using Firebase Data Connect.
Sign up for Data Connect → goo.gle/fb-dat...
Speaker: David East
Watch more:
Check out all the Cloud videos at Google I/O 2024 → goo.gle/io24-c...
Check out out all the Firebase sessions from Google I/O → goo.gle/io24-f...
Check out all the Web videos at Google I/O 2024 → goo.gle/io24-w...
Subscribe to Firebase → goo.gle/Firebase
#GoogleIO
Products Mentioned: Cloud - Databases - Cloud SQL
Event: Google I/O 2024
![Beginner to T-SQL [Full Course]](/img/n.gif)
I cant wait for fireship take on this
Firebase, you’ve done it again!! 👏👏👏
Great release Firebase team you are on 🔥
SO EXCITED!!! Awesome job Firebase team, this is exactly what I felt like I was missing from Firebase.
It's like some weird version of GraphQL
I felt the same way at first. But the SDK generation + typesafety dev loop is so great.
In love with the new Firebase logo 😍😍
My goodness! Are Google Cloud pricing actually for real? Is this meant for anyone other than fortune 500 companies?
where did you saw the prices?
@@AlmightyPyro on the website in the description
@@AlmightyPyro On the pricing page, it shows there is a 3 month trial and then "Google Cloud" pricing. Which links to the Google Cloud SQL page.
@@jonathonchambers6460 they have a tone of different options. From $20 to $500/ month
You're either very poor, or looking at the wrong instance types. You can rent a SQL instance for a variety of prices. Compute I've gotten as low as like 5$ a month.
Just here to stay David is awesome
Impressed. Would like to see a price breakdown vs supabase now
Just get Supabase. The price is astronomically different, at least based on what I looked at about 2 months ago. I doubt they've changed, and then you're in vendor lock. I'd run away from Firebase TBH
@@jrhager84 I don't think so I've been using firebase for a product for 4 years and it still has lower monthly cost than Supabase's pricing.
That was true also for a startup that we sold for 6 figures.
I've been waiting for firebase to produce a postgres product for a while now - and have been mulling over how to move to supabase. Now that this is here, I'm much less likely to do so.
Either way, you're vendor locked. Supabase may be OS but all your code is still designed for Supabase so what does it really change?
Firebase, a supabase alternative
Read that joke many times since Fireship made it yesterday.
A hasura alternative...?
@@matthewbeardsley7004 Amplify alternative
A GraphQL alternative
@@cedricol cool
Well done again David!
🙏🙏🙏
Congrats, Firebase just discovered GraphQL.
Given how Google handled stopping the deep link feature and the current uncertainty surrounding the future of Flutter, Google appears to be an unreliable partner. Therefore, I prefer to use a traditional SQL provider that doesn't require a new way of implementation.
The learning curve is a little steep for a beginner like me but I am so excited to try this out
I think you'll find that it you can do quite a lot with just a little knowledge!
Often in engineering stuff looks more complicated than it is once you dive in and get your head around the basics. Good luck!
Firebase is literally complete now
Does it support GraphQl subscriptions?
Sounds fantastic. Wake me up when C# is supported.
The price seems very high though!
So much bleeding on the edge 😆 awesome stuff firebase
This is going to change the game!
Wow now is a strong option i wish have this two years ago 😂 future looks promising
Confused about pricing. The pricing page on firebase says "There is no cost for the default configuration of your Cloud SQL for PostgreSQL instance: 1 vCPU, 10 GB of storage, 628.74 MB of memory." But also says " .. at which point you will be billed according to Cloud SQL pricing". Can you clarify?
I just want to have an individual from the public select what data they want, pay, and then have a csv file of the data they selected. why is that so hard?
@Firebase ... so wait, how does this compare to Firestore and FirestoreRules? Because so far this looks superior to FS with FSRules in every possible way! Should we switch to this DataConnect thing?
finally something useful from firebase, maybe i will migrate back to firebase once again
Love it but would love to see more features in firestore !
How will this scale compared to the nosql database you have in firebase? Is there going to be a way to move your old firebase db over?
Auto-migration between these different data models is not planned, but you can write a custom migration with the APIs of course. And we do plan to eventually also connect to Firestore, which would make that even easier. firebase.uservoice.com/forums/948424-general/suggestions/48434618-cloud-firestore-datasource
It is a little different than NoSQL - you have a fixed size instance that handles as much traffic as its memory and CPU can handle. Cloud SQL can scale to really massive use cases, but it's not as automatic as you might be used to with e.g. Firestore.
No automatic tools to move between dbs, but this is a request I keep hearing from folks. We'll think about it more.
Ok they have brought SQL but not the experience of working with SQL, what's the point then ?
Does it support streaming for clients like in Cloud Firestore?
Following a lot of the same patterns as EdgeDB, and I was just wishing there was a BaaS with a database like EdgeDB. Great stuff. Good luck making this competitively priced though
Impressive! Now firebase is the alternative of supabase
Very interesting. Will it support migration for the underlaying PostgreSQL database in case if you want to move out like in Supabase?
Data Connect works with a Cloud SQL for PostgreSQL database, so you can connect to it using any tool that can talk to Postgres.
Now the real question, whats the pricing for this?
During the gated preview it's all free to use. We're really just looking forward for your feedback at this stage.
Cloud SQL has established pricing, although we're adding a free trial period to it.
Data Connect itself will use pay-as-you-go pricing with a *generous* free tier.
Exact details are still being worked out, and will be announced when we go to public preview later this year.
Is there a way to migrate from firestore to data connect?
Can I just connect directly to the database when server side?
Yes, you can connect directly to the Cloud SQL database from a server, you can also issue arbitrary GraphQL queries to Data Connect from the server (but clients can only issue predefined queries).
Can I use it in Android studio in Java language?
Hi. Cool Project! I'm trying out the embeddings locally. In the video, I believe it describes when you run a local embedding with a mutation it will create a mock vector. I am trying this locally and it keeps giving me this error `unable to resolve SQL param $1: failed to build http client for calling Vertex. Error failed to setup an oauth for making Vertex AI embedding requests. Error google: could not find default credentials`. Is there a way to avoid having to call Vertex AI and even in production is it possible to use an open source embedding model?
It supports DML too?
this is so amazing
How would this work for B2B?
Impressed !!! Love it.
love it
amazing! can we expect data connect inside firebase emulators?
Oh yeah! It already is! I was using the local Data Connect emulator with a local postgres DB before I deployed to prod.
@@DavidEast awesome. emulators are great for e2e testing and local dev iteration
Cannot find experiment dataconnect
Did this SQL is "Pay as you go" ?
wow 😃
Easy question: for a new project what would be better in terms of scalability and maintenance? SQL or Firestore?
It's hard to say without using it more.
But my guess is firestore may be slightly easier still since you don't need to define backend stuff.
But in terms of maintenance I think SQL will be better. Changing your data generates migrations and since you aren't binding your data model to your views in a denormalized database you don't have to refactor a bunch because you changed how you view your data. Some tasks are also easier, like searching text fields.
In terms of scalability postgres scales for quite a while before you need to denormalize/duplicate/cache some data. I think the scalability arguments people use are over-hyped. I've written dozens of apps for people that never needed denormalization. The few that have, it was very minor things like one field. Granted if you become the next Facebook or something you may need more, but that's a good problem to have, and is something you can add then
One thing I missed is this is backed by cloudsql. So it probably doesn't have automagic for scaling instance size, at least that I know of.
So firestore is probably easiest and best at scaling. There's still a lot of reasons I'd rather use this if it's any good though, which mostly relate to limitations and challenges in firestore. If your database is difficult or annoying to denormalize that's a great reason to use this.
keren 👏
One of the reasons that we use SQL instead of NoSQL is transactions and isolation levels but I haven't heard about these futures in your presentation, do we have them or not?
Everything within a single query / mutation is performed inside a transaction, and we'll likely introduce some additional features for transactional mutations in the future.
This is crazy far out!!
how does this support for mobile app game development?
Where's my Fireship video on this?
Some concepts are similar to SAP CDS
isso tudo da um nó na cabeça!!!!
This got heated up quickly, if I said that you have SQL now just use SQL why do u add all of this hassle
World is coming back to wait Rails give me 10 years a go! i am happy i am using Rails
WOAHHHHHH
Great 👍
Does Data Connect support realtime functionality? How about optimistic updates to data?
Not yet, but you can vote for realtime capabilities on our roadmap here: firebase.uservoice.com/forums/948424-general/suggestions/48434600-realtime-query-updates
What’s the lowest cost cloudsql instance? Are there plans to support generating flutter clients with data connect?
Great question: cloud.google.com/products/calculator?hl=en&dl=CiRkNDc3NmFiYi00YjI4LTRjNjQtOThlOC04NWIzMGY3M2E1MzMQBxokNTdBODYwRTUtQjQ3RC00ODYzLUJBNTItNzEzNUEwQjMzQkU3 So a bit over 9 dollars.
And yes, generating Flutter SDKs is planned - and will be available before/with the public preview later this year. DM me if you want to help me test it earlier :-)
@@Frank_van_Puffelen Hi, I'm a flutter dev that would LOVE to help the Flutter SDK earlier ; )
looks awesome! but the main unanswered question for me is: can I use another 3rd party sql tool to read that data? or will be only accessible through a firebase layer request?
Yes you absolutely can. You have full access to the underlying Cloud SQL instance!
So they already use idx 🤔
I use IDX for everything!
@@DavidEast so you Google developers have early access to every product?
I love the tooling!
Are you going to open source these stuff?
😂😂😂😂😂😂
@@portalteam5832 obviously i was being sarcastic
I think the curve will be little steep
Please sign up for the preview! We have spent a ton of time designing the dev loop to be simple and to provide tooling to help along the way. We'd love to hear your feedback.
@@davideast4360 Finally!!! Today I have been added to Firebase Data Connect Gated Preview Insiders. can't wait to migrate my old SQL to DataConnect, for now Im going to write my tests. 🔥
Interesting, but this video would be more useful to me if it gave a little context up front: pros and cons of Data Connect vs Firestore for different scenarios.
Pros are you don't have to use a denormalized document based database with certain limitations because all queries have to be highly performant queries because you pay per query.
Cons are you have to use a relational database and have a bit more effort to define things up front, and may need to manage scaling a bit more and have more upfront cost (it's backed by a cloudsql instance? So idk if it can auto scale the same).
What theeeee.....
🤯🤯🤯
Feels to me as Hasura
Yeah but how does firebase handle Role Base Access Control vs Supabase? The deal killer
Data Connect has a novel security model that allows for a combination of RBAC and ABAC and can be used to secure at both row and column level. It's one of the most exciting features of the product to me 🙂
@@michaelbleigh8737 can we get a comparison to supabase RBAC?
Does it also build documentation?
Not yet, but it's definitely in the realm of possibility to do so. What would be your ideal form of generated documentation?
I hope there is an migration tool from firestore to data connect😅
This is nice, really nice, but why not 2 months earlier 😅
This looks like hasura on steroids aka llm rag ❤🎉
is this comming for mysql also?
It's not currently on our roadmap, but I'd encourage you to suggest it here: firebase.uservoice.com/forums/948424-general
well done, but it hasnt free tier and the cheaper is 9 usd per month. Not suitable for a starting hacker proyect, although they say they give me 3 months for free.
There was a lot of jargon thrown around in this video... I have no clue what they are... And ive been developing wih firebase for quite a number of years.
A lot of it was graphql jargon, or normal SQL jargon.
So if you haven't used either of those it makes sense it'd sound unfamiliar.
Queries, mutations, migrations, so on.
There was also some ai jargon I wasn't familiar with myself. The embedding stuff.
👍
Let's go GCP Linus
I'm disappointed... the queries don't even feel like sql.
we can use that with golang?
Yup, I have the same question
Our admin API is wire-compatible with GraphQL, so you can likely use a GraphQL library in Go to talk to it. We're still thinking about how we want to do Admin SDKs for Data Connect.
While incredibly cool, I'm not going to lie, the query CONSTANTLY shaking up and down as you write it and then pause and then write and then pause, is beyond frustrating.
You're telling me. We didn't have much time to get the production done on this and all videos have to be done really early. This was a current bug and it's been fixed since then.
Great but pricing…
Its SQL not Sequel!
No. Its squeeeel
you said postgress you said graph ql you said new mechanism so complex. why do i have to learn new process now.
understand your users are end users even they love simplicity i even after having good experience in tech industry though this is so complex and the reason is i dont want to learn new think just to use firebase db either keep graphql or keep sql keep it simple when i dont have to invest my whole time to learn this new thing we developers love now things but dont expect us to learn new things every thime you launch everything.
Firebase the supabase alternative
Finally I can stop using Hasura
why ?
hahahaha before, from asking AI is supabase have onAuthChange to is firebase had RLS and RPC 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
If we’re all getting replaced by ai who exactly are you making this for
Why does the studio look like a preschool
Honestly firebase outs everyone
Sorry, Supabase better :)
Oh wow, thanks, I hate it. 🥰
great now I only need web3 options and I would have everything in Firebase
sounds like GraphQL rip off
The end result is much different then graphql. Because it uses some graphql things, but it makes it easier at the cost of making the API exposed to clients not be graphql. Since you use graphql to define queries in advanced, clients can only call predefined queries much like a typical rest API.
@@ChaseAnderson5k ok so it uses GraphQL for API definitions but gives you REST endpoints?
@@JH-bb8in more or less. The Data Connect API is wire-compatible with GraphQL but only takes operationName and variables instead of also taking the query document itself. We then execute the predefined query of that name and return the results.
Can't see this being around for too long. Nightmare for data security as natural language isn't as easy to interpret and convert to practical. It would have been better if they kept to known coding language to help adoption. All this conversion and constant online connectivity requirement can be a burden for users expecting a rapid response.
SUPABASE always will and always been greater than you
I'm glad that they finally got relational database support, but I don't like the approach using GraphQL. Overall it seems overengineered.
I really hope you'll give it a try and I think you'll see that the dev loop is designed to be simple rather than over-engineered.
I think they chose graphql because it's a flexible way for us to query what we want.
In many ways graphql is great for clients and difficult for the API developer but in this case, firebase is the API developer and we are the client.
But we do define our queries in advance in the backend. They forego the advantage of clients defining whatever query they want to make security easy. Which is a worthwhile trade, by having only certain queries available in advanced it's no more limited than a typical rest API.
This looks very interesting
There should be an automaic migration from firestore to data connect postgresql
Sounds promising !
This remember me the time Angular migrated to Typscript. GraphQL is no more dead 😅