'Sovereign citizen' questions BC police over traffic stop in viral clip
Вставка
- Опубліковано 29 сер 2024
- A traffic stop in B.C.'s Fraser Valley earlier this month is gaining traction after the footage was uploaded online, showing the driver claiming the violation of his rights.
“I don’t consent to this, you are creating a non-consensual security agreement on the side of the road without right,” the driver said.
As Cassidy Mosconi reports, both police and lawyers say the argument doesn't hold up.
For more info, please go to globalnews.ca/...
Subscribe to Global News Channel HERE: bit.ly/20fcXDc
Like Global News on Facebook HERE: bit.ly/255GMJQ
Follow Global News on Twitter HERE: bit.ly/1Toz8mt
Follow Global News on Instagram HERE: bit.ly/2QZaZIB
#GlobalNews #BC #Traffic #RulesoftheRoad
His wife and children were in the car when he was removed. He made them all walk home after their car was towed, and refused a drive home when police offered.
@Rocksteady246 are you non receptive? Yeah he has a point, point basically is even if guy Is right or not he still effected his family by being some type of way.
@@noahsavillehaha, worry rather about blackface affecting badly millions of families in canada... his family was fine.
Did he hold his breath until he turned blue, too?
JUST CALL A TAXI.😢😮.COPS OFFERED A RIDE HOME.NICE.THX.😊
@@pilgrimsnest592lol what are you even babbling about?
He tried using American make-believe laws in Canada. Double whammy. It’s like citing the 80th Amendment of the US Constitution to police in Canada. It means nothing, in either country.
America's law and constitution is very much real and valid. Sad if you can't understand its reasoning is simply to protect you from corruption of power that is getting so much more reaching
how do you know?
@@noahsaville Just does not apply in Canada where this took place.
Sovereign Citizen movement is much more vast than just the United States to doop.
@@Jay_Force_One Yes, these delusional people may be found in Canada, Australia, New Zealand, the UK, and Germany as well.
Sovereign Citizen, cuz flat earthers need someone to laugh at too.
best comment yet
The driver has a flat earth hoodie... he wears it on his channel 😂😂😂
@@realalbertan Wow, that's a double whammy.I'm betting the first digit in his double digit IQ is a 6.
😂😂😂
Don’t insult flat-earthers
This guy is an embarrassment to Canadian citizens who exercise our rights and freedoms peacefully
I love when they say, "I don't consent". Who cares? What criminal "consents" to the law being enforced against them? Should Al Capone have said, "I don't consent", or John Gotti, or Manson, and be given a free pass?
In other words, "I don't consent to be held accountable."
These people just don’t want to have responsibilities… they don’t care about everyone else’s safety … I mean if they want to be “free” then go hang out on an ice sheet in the Arctic where you can’t really hurt anyone
@Rocksteady246 is it really though? They smash into you on the road whos taking care of you … not his insurance.
@Rocksteady246 how so 246th?
@Rocksteady246 It's quite true.
@Rocksteady246 Its called reality. It's called irresponsible. It's called childish. It's called a traffic violation.
The last thing it is is an assumption.
@Rocksteady246 That is your assumption, not the reality. Your childish rant id unbecoming of an adult.
Now my assuming your an adult is an assumption. Try and learn the difference.
Go build your own roads sovereign citizen.
they did, through gas tax, and taxes paid buying that vehicle, repairs and parts, and paying for property taxes and sales taxes, and registration fees - ...one day you'll wake up and realize you're being taxed to death.
its a scam
@@peterlongprong7521 Sovereign or not? If you are sovereign you don't pay taxes.
Maybe sovereign only when it suits them.
@@peterlongprong7521 One day you may wake up but I doubt it.
@@peterlongprong7521 Go move to a place that doesnt have/enforce taxes, like Somalia or South Sudan.
Why would a "sovereign citizen" even pull over if they believe the police have no jurisdiction over them? Or go to court when they receive a notice? If I believed the police and courts could not tell me what to do, then I would just go on about my business no matter what. They are delusional.
the cop creating an emergency where none exists. then commits fraud against the man, and attempts to access the security account to charge the FICTION WITH PRECRIMES.
no injured party here either to affi a loss or harm.
essentially the system drums up business as they see fit and creates one way adhesion contracts.
it's all fraud
however to answer your question... people pull over when they have honour to avoid dishonour. if a man wants to create an unprovoked controversy that's fine however if someone were to get injured due to reckless abandon full liability would be incurred therefore wise people submit under duress to a)not be disalived
b)protect occupant safety
c)protect public safety
This is not the USA and that sovereign citizen stuff doesn't work here. Grow up.
It doesn't actually work all that well in the USA either.
It doesn’t work anywhere. Lol
obey the law , how simple is that.
posting video clips on SNS does not make you immune.
@Rocksteady246 you sovereign citizen gang member
Probably pretty complicated for your average ape.
...fk human laws that protect and serve the Gov, instead of the people.
why have insurance $ that disappears into thin air - if you get into an accident, deal with it in court if it ever comes - the insurance cartels are screwing everyone _ but oh, wait, they are the ones that lobbied the Gov to make coverage MANDATORY instead of voluntary ! does that sound like 'freedom' ?
@@jumbome7420 figured
@Rocksteady246 what are you on about?
Driving with no insurance. lol. Anyone defending this driver is an absolute clown.
in my state in the US - the Insurance cartels have lobbied the Gov to make it mandatory not only for each person to pay for THEIR OWN insurance per vehicle, but also to pay an additional "non-insured driver" insurance in case someone runs into them doesn't have insurance - (so we pay twice the amount) ~ now explain how crazy that is!
There once was a time.. long, long, ago.. insurance wasn’t law and world was all and all. Insurance is the biggest scam know to the modern world.
Spot on!
then you must be a government pawn lol
Some people lose there drivers license over 2 beers and still have to get to work
Sovereign Citizen Compilations are some of the most entertaining merr'kan entertainment!
Merr'kan? Sounds like Klingon.
@@MadAlhazred It's merr'kan.
@@MadAlhazredred necks are pretty alien to the rest of us 😂
What you have here is a tax dodger. Won't pay for anything but expects to use roads and hospitals that we pay for....
Um, well then i got a fine for no registration (it was one day late) for no reason? Sorry bud, you've just cost yourself a whole lot more than the cost of insurance and registration.
Driving without insurance is a terrible idea. If you get in an accident you'll have no way of paying lawyers and or damages. You are a liability and a risk to every other person on the road.
It's the way of life in Brampton.
dont worry, he is a good driver.
They never drive a Prius, do they?
I see what you’re getting at 😂
Everyone need insurance to drive on a public roadway.
Play stupid games win stupidity prizes.
Robbing a bank but not getting caught doesn't mean its legal to rob a bank.
@Rocksteady246hope you're a quick learner when your stupid prize shows up
@@brunogardoz3360 texes are robbery and you still pay them
@Rocksteady246 Till you get pulled over I guess. Good luck to ya but I know you well enough by now, I have reasonable doubt you drive anywhere but the basement for dinner lol.
@Rocksteady246 That is so childish, so immature, and irresponsible. Disgusting.
Another guy talking when he should have been listening.
"A non-consensual security agreement"... lol, stop making stuff up dude. You want to enjoy the rights and freedom of this country, that has a small price. You don't like the price, pack up and move.
Another little boy in a pick up truck. 😂
@Rocksteady246
No? But apparently I've hurt yours?
😂
@Rocksteady246dude the guy is literally laughing and you do seem annoyed though 😂 are you typing this from your cute little truck?
@Rocksteady246dude you’re literally the one who got triggered and upset enough to make a mean comment. Way to project tho 😂😂😂. ❄️
You know what I think those “sovereign citizens” should do? Go live on an island where there literally are no rules; ‘Lord of the Flies’ style. Then, you legally are, a sovereign citizen.
You must like the taste of RCMP boot leather…
That island would be a successful. Would make us all jealous of thier lifestyle. Then we would go their as outsiders and ruin it just like immigrants ruined canada.
@Rocksteady246 no argument here…
Do you have directions to this hypothetical isle of liberty & abolitionism that you speak of? Humans cannot be free & own themselves if there's nowhere that they can realistically go without some armed gang ruling every tiny detail of their lives at gunpoint using the threat of offensive violence. I (an individual with inherent rights) never consented to be their chattel slave.
@@deeznutz3958 You can criticize the operations of the police (systemic racism, policing violence, etc) without indulging the self-important insanity of the sovereign citizen movement lmao
This right here, is the definition of F around and find out. Who else would like to try this? lol
This is the message to solvent citizens. If you don’t agree, please leave the country.
This Sovereign citizen stuff is the craziest thing I’ve ever heard! Do they not realize how much worse they make it on themselves! Just comply with the law! And these things wouldn’t escalate. I understand there are some cases where the law is out of line but almost every single stop I’ve seen the officers are completely in the right. They simply give an order, get out of the car and the person doesn’t listen. And then people scream police brutality. Which quite frankly is an insult to those who have actually experienced police brutality. Getting you out of the car forcefully is not brutality when you didn’t listen or comply to orders. Especially when the people are trying with everything to not be cuffed. What do they expect? Stay still and comply and they won’t rough house you into cuffs.
I guess you wear triple masks and do what ever you’re told
Lmao just comply! The government has your best interest in heart!
@@sierravortec2494 I don’t know about your best interest but … if you don’t screw with them they won’t screw with you
@@jodiforrester7 so we’ve completely thrown the idea that government works for the people not the other way around out the window I guess eh?
@@sierravortec2494 you didn’t say works for the people. You said they had your best interest at heart; they don’t have a heart. I believe there are people that work For the government that care. But not the government itself. American values and ethics and foundation in God is WAY out the window. It flew out the window, hit the road and rolled down the street, into a river that took it … oh i don’t know … the swamps of Louisiana. On its way out to the Ocean to be forever lost.
😂😂🤣 he thought he can drive around without insurance
The driver was watching too much American Reels. lol
MAGA Canadians. MCGA?
He wasn't 'driving'. He was 'traveling'.
Driving, not traveling. Operating a motor vehicle is driving.
All I see here is an officer doing his job.
Thank you officer 🫶🏻💙
Boot leather must be tasty to you
I love how these dummies think they are above or outside the law somehow
@Rocksteady246 Yeah, criminals, anarchists and mindless sovereign citizen bother me.
They would hurt my feelings if I cared about them but they aren't worthy.
@Rocksteady246 NO, you are the dummy, criminals are dummies and, well they are simply common criminals.
So why do you hate our constitution?
@@oddball_2887 who writes "the law"?
He would have made a great Freedumber Trucker Protester.
Criminal: I'm a sovereign citizen. 🙄
"I demand to see your supervisors"
"Okay, here they are, Captain Taser..."
ZZZZZZZZZAP!
".......and Cheif Nightstick"
WHACK!
what an embarrassment, if you break the law and get caught, just accept it.
imagine Germany 1940 - just obey the law! never question the government they are never wrong.
@@codywohlers2059 Nazi Germany can't be compared to modern day Canada....
@@codywohlers2059lmao comparing not having car insurance and reg to nazzzzzzi Germany is the lamest strawman argument ever made 😂😂😂
Thanks officer 🫡.
Next time; just walking or riding horse buggy
State and counties build the roads and they established rules to use their roads. One of those rules is to have a proper state issued license in order to use their roads. If you do not wish to comply then travel how you want, but don't use someone's else property.
Thank you, no license. No registration, no license plate. Jail
Pick up truck with attitude 😂😂😂..Joker!
These same sovereign citizens also claim they are not obliged to repay their debts citing a bunch of nonsensical jargon which has no legal standing. They have no issue spending the money, when they do they don’t want to pay what they legitimately owe. We ought to have zero tolerance for these people.
the world should fear your hate speech
@@EarthAngelFire777you ok bro? 😂
@@kateashby3066 remember what they say about scoffers. good luck you're gonna need it
This is Canada not the USA. We have no Constitution.
We do actually though it is not one single document like the US Constitution.
It consists of the Constitution Act, 1867 (formerly the British North America Act, 1867), the Constitution Act, 1982, and a few other pieces of legislation that amended those documents.
I take it you were not around in 1982.
no rights no freedom.
@@Francois_Dupont You might want to try reading the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms before you open your mouth and insert your foot in the future.
@@blackprince7510 BY freedom, people like that mean that they can do whatever they want without consequences. That isn't freedom, it's anarchy.
@@frankw7091 I know what they mean.
But occasionally you run into one that hasn't gone so far down the rabbit hole that thy cannot be reasoned with or at least convince others not to follow.
Very good. This right to travel, baisically means the right to be a passenger in a car, and the driver has to be insured, registered and licensed. No exceptions!
It's little wonder the BC police are stumped, they never heard this guy's delusions. I mean he is spouting utter nonsense in place or reality.
These particular RCMP officers may not have heard such nonsense before personally but I suspect they have heard of this nonsense. These sorts have been arrested, convicted, fined, and jailed in Canada for at least a couple of decades.
But they didn't look very stumped to me.
@blackprince7510 Good point. It's not the first encounter fir the RCMP.
@Rocksteady246 That is a joke right?
I mean even if you didn't mean it to be a joke, it is a joke.
@Rocksteady246 Do you realize what will happen if you disband your national police force? The very idea is stupid.
Not possible to be a sov. citizen in Canada.. This land is owned by the crown.
Good point!
Not possible to be a 'Sovereign citizen' in any democratic country, grow up and stop playing MAGA.
The earth and the increase that it yields was promised to neither the crown nor sovereign citizens.
They call themselves "Freemen of the Land" in Canada
@@derekflegg2670 If you think YOU can go through Life on your own Terms and that Laws do not apply to you, then you need to grow up and act like an Adult.
LEOs should be trained on how to put a stop to the sovereign script! If these criminals refuse to comply, don't waste time, just immediately arrest them!
I don't think they particularly cared what he said. After all his truck was towed and he won't be getting it back without jumping through a some hoops requiring him to, among other things, pay some fines, pay some impound lot fees, and get his truck licensed and insured.
Sovcits is a lost cause. Always will be. End of.
Notice how he said everyone is equally "responsible" to follow the law. He didn't say "required" and under what authority.
Arguing that the cop said "responsible to" rather than "required to" won't prevent the courts from fining the driver and the truck won't be released until he gets valid plates and insurance. Since you cannot get valid plates without valid insurance (insurance agents are the ones who hand you your new plates in BC), he won't be driving his truck out of the impound lot without both.
Try reading _Meads v. Meads,_ 2012 ABQB 571 for an analysis of common "sovereign citizen" arguments and how they are viewed in Canada by the courts.
The cops have no right to tow the truck
They have every right to tow the truck since it is unregistered and not insured. Provincial law requires you register your vehicle and insure that vehicle before using it on public roads. In fact, you actually obtain insurance from the Insurance Corporation of BC at the same time you register your automobile in BC. You cannot really do one without doing the other.
Since his truck is not registered or insured, it is not allowed on BC roads.
It's impossible to be a "sovereign citizen". You can be one or the other.
In Canada if you are operating a motor vehicle the police an ask for you license, registration and insurance at any time. But if you are a pedestrian they then need to have reasonable suspicion or evidence of a crime.
These types of people that film private property, video police and Security are complete dumb.
They read the Canadian Charter of rights and think they know everything and start harassing police and even other citizens too.
Also asking the officers for their name and identification badge number, then they refuse to give out their names and want the officers name. Technically hiding their private information but giving out the officers private information.
Even though these people aren't in Law enforcement or have a license or a certificate of the law.
I see that they are completely dismissive behaviour, harassment, and sometimes even verbally abusing the police and starting conflict that way. It honestly makes me mad at those people that think they know everything and are above the law and above the police too.
Nature has no written charters nor laws!!!🎉❤😊ps:no taxes either.😊
Nature has laws
In Canada under the constitution and upheld by the Canadian Supreme Court their is no expectation of privacy in public. And yes the police MUST give you their name and number when asked.
On the walls in his mom's basement, he has pictures of Tim McVeigh Ted Kaczynski, and Andrew Tate.
.
@Rocksteady246 You should stop watching FAUX 'NEWS'. Trump won, AMIRITE?
And roofpizza's walls are covered with Justin Trudeau, Joe Biden, and Jacinda Ardern : (
So does 100 million other people, so get with the program, well Andrew anyway
You cut out the tow truck driver... he's the best part of the video!
I love the ones from Canada that are coming out of people stating American laws😂 in Canada the cops can pull you whenever they want for no reason to breathalyze you.
driving's not a right and insurance/registration is the law so
Ontario doesn't even need to have reasonable articuable suspicion to ID you.
Good luck "Sovereign Citizens"...
does make for some entertaining video however :)
Yes, yes it absolutely does lmfao Carding has been illegal in Ontario since I was in Highschool mate
@@user-pf8nj5li4d Not according to the Canadian Civil Liberties Association.
There are three general circumstances during which the police are allowed to stop you and demand identification:
1. If they suspect that you have committed a crime
2. If they see you committing a crime
3. If you are driving
@@blackprince7510This is correct if you’re in public, walking around etc.
But, if you’re driving a motorized vehicle on a public road/highway, the cops can pull you over and ID you with zero suspicion of a crime or probable cause, unlike the US where you would have to break a law in order to be lawfully pulled over and ID’d.
@ Strictly speaking, Canadian police officers still require a legitimate reason for pulling you over but that reason can be as simple as performing a safety check of your vehicle, making it very easy to justify the traffic stop. But the cop must still be able to articulate that reason.
There have still been incidents where the reason given for the stop was not accepted as valid by the court. There was a case heard by the Supreme Court of Canada, _R. v. Harrison,_ 2009 SCC 34 (CanLII), [2009] 2 SCR 494, in which an Ontario police officer pulled over a rental van for not having a front licence plate. The van was registered in Alberta and did not require a front plate. The officer, upon realizing this, chose to continue the detention though he did not articulate a valid reason to do so later in court. He determined the driver's licence was suspended and, during a subsequent search of the van, discovered 35kg of cocaine. The trial court convicted the driver and the appeals court upheld the conviction. But the Supreme Court ruled that the officer had committed a serious Charter violation by continuing the detention once he realized the van did not require a front licence plate and ruled the cocaine evidence from the search was excluded as a result.
Another instance in 2015 was the stop by a Kelowna RCMP officer of an automobile because the passenger had thrown his hands up in the air at the officer after some poor driving on the officer's part. The officer pulled over the automobile and, when challenged by the driver, told her he was performing a licence and insurance check. But video of the incident showed he had really pulled over the car to berate the passenger for the gesture because it upset him. The officer was subject to an internal investigation for the incident. The officer can be clearly heard to admit he had been distracted and that the gesture by the passenger had made him mad.
There is also a rather funny Ontario court ruling, _R. v. Duncan,_ 2013 ONCJ 160 (CanLII), which involved a supposed turn signal use violation, refusal to produce a driver's licence, and subsequent altercation that led to the driver being charged with allegedly assaulting a police officer. The reason for the stop was rejected by the court as not valid and the charges dismissed. The decision is not funny because of the ruling but rather how the judge wrote up his decision.
The only thing that holds us together as a society is the law. Thank goodness for our legal system in Canada!
Try and file a complaint about the RCMP and find out how much they are required to "obey' their self's or the law.
No accountability.
No Rights.
IF you want to be treated like a human being, you need to get a job in the overlord class.
Everybody is held to the law except trudeau....right rcmp?
Whether or not Trudeau is guilty of some violation of Canadian law is completely irrelevant to what is happening in this video.
You don't want Trudeau to be PM. Galvanize support against the Liberal Party for the next election. Not that Polievre would be much of an improvement.
@@blackprince7510 wrong
This notion that we live in a free country is a huge misconception, Canada is a country with privileges that can and will be taken away. A citizen must be aware of and abide by the laws of the area in which they live.
omg...and you are absolutely fine with that aren't you? seems a bit like dictatorship then democracy
@barbarella2691 What are you so twisted about?🤔
Let's take a breath and reread that, It was simply a statement of facts, the reality of the world we live in, and this is nothing new. There have been laws in some form or another for as long as human beings have been living communal settlements they are the moral standard people live by, and that is how society works. Canada is not remotely close to a dictatorship.
I hope your day gets better 😊
@@Fisher221and that's exactly how long we've been slaves. there are ways to achieve liberty if we trust in god.
You fail to comprehend that a citizen is a legal term for slave . A living man is born free sovereign but the govt turns them into corporations so they can tax you and fine you. It’s crazy how many people have fallen for this deception that legal is lawful and worse you defend it like a good slave to his master.
The policemen done his job. Show respect, call in a staff sergeant. Can't be any more professional than anyone ask of them.
Jesus ! Did the media just learn about “ sovereign citizens” 🤦♂️
Jesus is busy with real people. Leave a message at the beep.
Cops need to be trained to stop saying “…ok?” when they end a sentence. It implies a choice, asking permission, etc. for no real reason.
Or simply looking for some comprehension of what is about to happen on the part of the driver.
They may not have been quite so polite if his wife, who is also a sovcit type, and his children weren't with him.
So much of this rubbish comes out of America and is spread on the internet. It has come to the UK as well.
There is only one law in Banada, you have top do what ever the crown says; OR ELSE.
They are the ones with guns so, figure it out.
The law applies to you just like it applies to everyone else. Something that I suspect the driver of the pickup has yet to figure out.
@@blackprince7510 obviously, you know nothing about it, because that is just a marketing gimmick. ALL crown agents have unchecked discretion. That is why Im not a real human being, and dont actually have any rights of any kind in the mighty culture of HMK
Kieran Devine v HMK
T-2060-22
This isnt something I just imagined up. THIS IS WHAT THEY SAY!!!
Kieran Devine V HMK
T-2060-22
They used their unchecked discretion to determine Im not a human being, so cant have any kind of human rights. How can you constitutionally challenge unconstitutional laws when you don't have any constitutional rights??
Am I missing anything?????
This isnt something I just imagined up. THIS IS WHAT THEY SAY!!!
Kieran Devine V HMK
T-2060-22
How can I constitutionally challenge unconstitutional laws when I don't have any constitutional rights??
Am I missing anything?????
You really cannot do that in Canada
I need to find the other OZ video with the mum and daughter.
"I don't consent." Translation, "I'm delusional."
You do realise that pretty much the whole 'freedom convoy ' movement thinks this way.
Proof, please. There may have been a very small minority, if a handful of people. If you only had an ounce of their conviction to stand up for what what is right. That's why they were all arrested. Go spout your lies somewhere else!
@@disgruntledcanuck The SovCit movement, aka Freemen on the land, are part of the libertarian camp. It's no different in principle from the freedom convoy. They flout the laws, believing that the government doesn't, or should not have, jurisdiction over their lives. I'm sure the two posters supported them, if only in principle.
Look at the 'Queen of Canada' She's just another SovCit who had attachments to the convoy.
@@user-pf8nj5li4d To a SovCit, everthing is. Sorry to trigger ya. Notice how this SovCit calls into question the police and authority? That's exactly what the convoy does.
And we think you love Trudeau
@@lrmguitars1224Prove me wrong kids. All you do is cause chaos within Canadian society. The law applies to you too. Live by it.
I. would to have seen the entire video
You can’t be a souvenir citizen 😂 you can’t be both
Driving is not a priviledge. You take a test, pass the test, so therefore it is earned. We pay heavily priced insurances and gasoline. Does any of that sound priviledged. Stupid cop.
Ya that's meets the definition. It's a special right because u have to pass a test
The look on the cops face says everything
Driving without insurance and people in the car 😂 you can only shake your head at this stupidity
If he truly doesn’t believe that he needs a license to drive (0:14) … why did he get one in the first place? 🤔 No insurance and _wrong_ license plates? Tow the car and sell it at auction. Yup.
Lol bye
fascinating comment.
Create a sovereign country somewhere nobody wants.
Tell them there's a state of war and they should return to their country. Hinted ' or else '.
Law is law, so people can escape?
No the law in for the poor others Trudeau would none in jail, that’s really, actually another stupid complainant Canadian
Now law is land air war, 3 jurisdictions. Law of the land is superior to law of the sea which is LEGAL aka commerce law. Its not about escaping its about knowing your rights and not consenting to their fake contracts and unlawful acts.
Umm..he had no insurance! That's illegal and could impact someone else negatively if an accident occurs.
You think legal is lawful 🤓 and tou believe insurances will cover you 😂😂 clearly you’ve never made a claim on you dmv insurance, you have to fight to get any reimbursement..
To the lady speaking around the @1:18 mark... PLEASE LOSE THE VOCAL FRY! Hard to take you serious when you speak like that
Sovereign citizens are nuts, but I have to say that if i were in from out of town I'd have difficulty believing those guys were cops. They look like out of work baseball players
That attorney is cute. I’d want her on my case.
It's better just to run and get into a high speed pursuit
Remember they have these rules for the common folk , if you don't like them ,run for government and change them.
Why was he originally pulled over ..?
Did you not watch the video? It clearly tells you why!
Take a look at the fake plates on his truck. Do you think they would be really obvious to a cop driving by, as happened in the video?
Fake plates he had made. He put his passport number as the plate number 😂, also they were red plates with white characters on them. Legit red plates in BC & Ontario are used by embassy and consulate vehicles.
@@blackprince7510 I think he made them red to make it look like an embassy/consulate plate.
@@realalbertan Which would indicate he knew exactly what he was doing was illegal and making a deliberate attempt to avoid being caught.
Instead of getting to see the video clip I have to watch these bores giving their opinions
It is available elsewhere on UA-cam, like the Van Balion channel.
You will get to see the "freeman on the land" in all his ignorant glory.
Of course it's a pickup truck.
Well, sovcits sure provide a lot of entertainment on You Tube! lmao
Who's heir 'sovereign' anyway? King Charles is in England! 😅
Dude got pulled over by Ricky from the Trailor Park Boys.
So many drive without insurance in the lower mainland due to excessive fines , accidents, high insurance premiums they can’t afford etc. happens in the USA as well.
That is fair, yeah
You are ignoring other laws we have rights God gave them. I am not anyones property but the one
Your god did not give you the right to use public roads free from laws enacted by the elected representatives of your fellow citizens in a state or provincial legislative assembly.
You may not be anyone's property but you don't have to be to be subject to laws governing the use of the property of others.
Lawyer is hot
You are either sovereign under (English) The Bill of Rights 1689 (sometimes known as the Bill of Rights 1688). This legislative body is still in effect within **ALL COMMONWEALTH REALMS** most of you are just ignorant…you are a CITIZEN standing under corporate codes & statutes. CANADA IS A A CORPORATION REGISTERED AS A FOREIGN GOVERNMENT ON EDGAR & THE SEC. Do your research.
Bc cops dint like alberta people simple
To the best of my knowledge, the guy lives in Abbotsford, BC.
I always wonder what is the true theists sovereign citizens vs atheists sovereign citizens ratio???
Since they believe that it is possible to drive a car without proper training, then when these idiots do repairs at home, companies should be prohibited from sending licensed electricians, plumbers and construction equipment drivers to them, and sending unskilled workers from the labor exchange to them, and when the house falls apart or is demolished by an excavator driver who is sitting driving it for the first time, the court will take into account the contractor's argument "I don't consent!" and will refuse compensation for damages to sovereign citizen!!!😂😂😂
What about the shady RCMP unlawfully and continually questioning drivers in routine traffic stops? Lets talk about that?
l am not saying drive without insurance or license, please drive with them. But why should RCMP get the benefit of the doubt when they harrass ppl charter of rights and freedoms everyday on the road without due suspicion? Police already get to breath test anyone they feel like driving, why shouldnt police themselves be held accountable for their misgivings on the road?
The man had a fake licence plate on his truck. That gives the police probable cause to stop him. They have the authority to demand identification from the driver and the driver is obligated by law to produce it.
That the RCMP or other Canadian police forces may overstep their authority in some instances has no bearing on what you see in this video.
Beyond producing valid ID or identifying himself and producing valid registration/insurance paperwork, the driver is under no obligation to answer questions asked by the officers. But he is a typical sovereign citizen/freeman on the land type who just can't keep his mouth shut, desperately wanting to show his supposedly superior knowledge of Canadian and BC law.
@@blackprince7510 For every one instance liked this, there are 10-20 normal traffic stops. Normal traffic stops, that during the citation - the officer freely asks questions.
And when you say, I dont have to answer that, the officer gets annoyed. lt never occurred to the lousy officer, that he is annoying and unduly delaying the person on the road.
1 - Traffic stop. Present Driver ID, registration, proof of insurance. Write the ticket or get a warning. See you off, bye. That is it.
2 - The mischievous officer instead derails the traffic stop, and starts asking you questions, that after the first one you already said, I dont talk to police without a lawyer or I dont answer questions. But they continue.
3 - Warn the officer immediately. Badge number, name, constabulary you report to. I am filing a complaint for harassment, undue detainment while not being detained, disregarding your actionable charter of rights. Depending on the officer demeanor, pass on to your attorney too.
Everyone needs to follow the law. Everyone. Everyone is accountable for not following it.
@@demetrioshristovski4518 While you don't have to answer questions unrelated to the traffic stop, there is absolutely no need to be an utter dick in your interaction with the police officer.
The information you are insisting on getting from the police officer is all on the traffic citation you will receive.
But if that is how you feel you need to respond to a simple traffic stop, then you do you.
@@blackprince7510 lts not rudeness. Never be rude with an officer. But direct, concise, lawful - yes. Dont have to answer questions, at all. Related to anything. You ask why you were stopped, but not common since most officers will open with ''do you know why l have stopped you this day'' anyway, and you say, ''no please tell me'' And he will. No further answers to that reply, neither confirm nor deny. No sudden movements, keep your hands on the drivers wheel, seatbelt always on. Ask the officer, ''may l take off my belt, may l reach to my glove box and retrieve my car papers to present to you'' He will comply of course. Give the officer your license, registration, promoted insurance. While the officer is running everything, and possibly writing a citation, he may ask ''so where you coming from'' he may ask you ''you coming back from dinner or was out with friends?''
The officer isnt looking to be polite. He is fishing for clues and hunches, on other fiddlesticks. Fiddlesticks, frankly none of his business. Dont answer police questions. Immediately inform him, ''officer, please, not trying to be rude, but l dont talk to strangers. I dont answer questions without representation'' This is 1st and final warning. The warning is free. Say, ''officer, please get back to traffic violation, that is why you stopped me yes?'' If he further detracts and deflects, and says ''why are you being jumpy? Are you hiding something?'' Immediately, you reply, ''okay officer, please what is your badge number, your name, what constabulary you report to?'' I require this information for my complaint. I require this information for my attorney. I may possibly consider legal action. No further questions, roll up your window to 1inch, and say you await the traffic ticket. He can slip it through. Drive off. If he further talks to you, and imposes as demand for breath test, and he may - to irritate you, comply. Take the test. Immediately after you are let off from the police stop, phone your attorney. Schedule a session. Lay charges against the police for harrassment, undue detainment, no reasonable grounds, unprofessional conduct. The amount of 250,000k cases simply because of this is unreal.
@@demetrioshristovski4518 Do you always engage in fantasies about your encounters with the police and then feel the need to tell others no matter how disinterested they may be.
I really don't gaf about your your silly advice to "lay charges against the police for harassment".
You don't talk to strangers? What are you? Prepubescent?
I thought SovCits were called "Freemen On The Land" in Canada.
They often call themselves that.
The Canadian courts generally call them Organized Pseudo-legal Commercial Argument (OPCA) litigants, a term coined in an analysis of such people found in Alberta Associate Chief Justice JD Rooke's decision of _Meads v. Meads,_ 2012 ABQB 571. An analysis that has been cited in over 200 Canadian court decisions rejecting arguments such as those of the man in this video.
Go to Brampton find out how many are driving without a license or insurance 😊 the cops would make enough money to pay our deficits 😊
Lol 😂😂😂 and the truck got towed
No insurance. $5k fine
I've seen two of your videos and wonder why they both are from the cameras of the person being stopped. Why?
The police don't upload their bodycam footage of these idiots, if it exists, very often. They often feel they don't have much to gain from doing so.
I know of one instance however of a "sov cit" uploading phone footage starting just before the cops broke the driver's window and arrested both the driver and his wife. The driver claimed he had done nothing wrong and the cops smashed the window within a few minutes of his being pulled over.
The police department in question then released their in-car camera and body cam footage on UA-cam showing the breaking of the window did not occur until close to half an hour into the traffic stop. The couple had absolutely refused to get out of the car. Turned a simple traffic stop for not wearing seat belts into an arrest.