GABI! Just saw your email. Your very sage advice always arrives at the perfect time. I'm singing the Golden Girls intro right now with extra vibrato--"Thank you for being a friiieennndddd!" Appreciate you! 🤗🌻✨
Appreciate you right back!!! Sorry that email took so long to arrive. I completely missed it! Always message me when you need a friend to chat with or run ideas by!@@AwkwardAnthems
Just went through your videos and learned a lot. I work as a video editor but the videos I make are mass produced videos that are very different than youtube videos. I dont feel like I get experience doing a lot of the video editing things I notice in Awkward Anthems videos. Heres a list of things I feel confused about as an individual trying to advance my video editing skills. - Making custom animations (the arrows, splashes, swoops, and all those sorts of graphics) - Talking about when custom animations are good and when they could be bad to use and how to balance that - Timing and length of cuts, when 2-3 second clips are okay, when 2-3 second clips are bad, when 10 second clips are better, when 10 second clips are bad - How to create a system to make video editing faster - How to prepare for and focus during a video editing session - When to take breaks - Common Mistakes people make video editing - Examples of specific video editing techniques that saved you a lot of time when you learned them - Introduction to your favorite video editing tool; overview of how it looks and what you like about it - Awkward Anthem videos sometimes include an auditory cue of the visual change that is about to occur; I love that and want to understand how to do it better - How to process the video while editing. for example when one goes through a video to cut it, then one goes through to add this, then one goes through to add that. Or does one start at the beginning and work to the end, cutting and adding as one goes? ABC ABC ABC or AAA BBB CCC ? - A video about the rule of thirds and how to use it while video editing - Differences between web-based video editors and program-based editors - Brief overview of the websites of 10 different video editing tools (not the tools themselves) - How to handle feeling burned out or bored of editing - How to get start practicing video editing - How to get a job as a video editor - How to balance audio level between music and speaker. I always eff the music up. Whats good music whats bad?
CALLING IT NOW! 1:06 is going to be the MOST replayed section!!!! I mean, having Mike is OBVIOUSLY cool...but...this is MORGAN!!!! My year is starting off GREAT with BOTH of you in a video! ALONG with more MORGAN art!!! I must have been a VERY good boy. = ) And yes, Roombas MAY just be scouting things out in advance of the big attack, but if AI robots get uppity, we'll just take them out with primitive weapons. Like the Ewoks did with the Empire.
Awwwww . . . the Ewoks! That's right, they DID do that. Now I'm no longer worried about A.I. Thanks Classic Slover! (BTW, you're waaaaay better than that "New and Improved Slover" they be peddling these days!)
@@classicslover Hmmmm . . . I just looked it up on Urban Dictionary and ur right!! So, per my take on ur moniker, I would see a Classic Slover as being: Elementary school friends playing after school on a Friday, being happily surprised by their parents that they can sleep over, pizza and soda for dinner, late night TV/movie watching, sleeping in, followed by Saturday morning cartoons and wax, chocolate donuts for breakfast!!! . . . a "Classic Slover." (awwww, the memories)
I'm really annoyed at the algorithm right now for hiding this awesome content from me (and apparently from everyone else too). But, silver linings - hearing Amy explain her theories for why that happens is super interesting.
It's difficult to predict how things will play out. I think we're past the point where we can stop it, hopefully we can navigate things well enough to get more good than bad from it.
There are a lot of problems with machine learning algorithms and their training sets pertaining to intellectual property rights. Hate to think the AI corporations can put out work "like a certain artist" by stealing all the artwork that artist made. Robert Miles AI Safety on UA-cam has lots of videos on artificial general intelligence and why we better build in safety early if we want to continue. As in, if we want humanity to continue existing. It's really good work and can be super scary. Consider that nation states see the upside potential in AGI and building in safety likely slows the overall developmental process. That means that the first AGI developed is more likely to be an unsafe one. Oops. Edited for typo
Hello 👋. I just found your channel through Legal Eagle. I watched a few episodes and subscribed. Your very talented and funny. I also find the video's thought provoking. I look forward to going through your channel. 🤘😁🖖🇨🇦🕊️
Hello! I just found you via the LegalEagle video, and I love the way you think, happy to be a new sub. My $0.02 on AI: it's an amazing technology that can be put to great use, but we need to put societal, legislative, and technological guardrails in place ASAP (as in yesterday) to make sure it's used ethically and responsibly. We can't just sit back and let the tech run wild on this, it's far too powerful and dangerous to remain unaddressed.
On the positive side AI is already helping to make some stunning advances in several sciences, especially medicine. The new drugs we're going to have, and the speed and precision of creating them, is going to be stunning. AI in chemistry and materials research will be transformative.
CRAIG! Always great to "see" you, my friend! This is a great point too. AI's contributions to medicine and other scientific discoveries will be wild! I hope it will be a force for good. ✨
Every ending is a beginning in disguise to the narrator. This fiction is what gives rise to dieties as we are trained to look for cause to an effect. In reality, it is a continuum with no beginning nor end.
We’ve introduced technologies that consume resources at an increasing pace without considering the externalities, and a lot of the people who stand to gain economically from widespread adoption are accelerationists. Unless there’s a dramatic shift in how we incentivize social and economic participation, a whole bunch more people are going to suffer so that a handful of people can tighten their control and become even richer. I have a GPT subscription and a talking robot. The tech is amazing, and grassroots adoption is important, but I wish the energy consumption was known, and I wish LLMs and training model data was open source, and training contributors owned a part of what they’d trained.
I’m not one for hope. It leads to disappointment, anger, despair and the Dark Side. However, I never made the connection it too came from that darn box! Thanks!
In my corner of the world, I'm seeing a rapid proliferation of AI-fueled gardening channels and gardening articles that kick out dozens of instances of content daily with minimal human supervision and zero fact checking. As an aspiring gardening content creator, I worry that there will eventually be so much garbage about gardening on the internet that people will stop looking for gardening content.
At 2 minutes in I had to look down to refresh my memory of what this video was about. And then I hit the subscribe button. Anyway, I've often said that once someone teaches agile humanoid robots to play football, the NFL will die shortly thereafter. So, there is an upside.
I had to rewind back to just * after * your fiancée appearance because I just kept laughing, then I'd stop to pay attention to the vid, think about Morgan's statement, and then keep laughing (couldn't watch it a second time without more continuous laughter). As for the keys... * sigh * wait til you get older... it doesn't just happen to keys... but the glasses you're wearing, and the phone you are using. SMH Edit: format
Hi Amy. Late response here, but nerdy nitpick inbound: The fruit that Eve ate in Scripture wasn't an apple. We actually don't get a description of what it was, only that it was from "The Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil".
The video insightfully highlights the potential dangers of AI, underscoring the need for ethical frameworks and regulatory oversight. It's a reminder that while AI can bring immense benefits, its development and deployment must be handled responsibly to avoid unintended consequences. Ensuring AI is aligned with human values and controlled in a way that mitigates risks is crucial for its positive integration into society.
I wish I could agree with you. Insofar as AI's alignment with human values, you're way off-base, as one of the more worrisome aspects of machine learning is that it tends to mimic the beliefs and values of its creators _too well_ (see Amazon's aborted effort at AI-driven hiring). Every "AI turns evil" scenario I've heard of is either due to an AI that's too stupid or too human. We are all biased hypocrites, to some extent, so a system capable of developing its own ethics and values might do us good. Also, while I agree that regulation is critical to avoiding the worst consequences of an AI revolution, I don't think preemptive regulation is worth pursuing. I can't think of a single case of new technology being regulated ethically and reasonably before the damage was already done, and even if sanity miraculously prevails, effective enforcement of many (if not most) necessary measures would be impossible without other miracles happening first. After all, the most worrisome applications of AI are exactly the ones of interest to entities that either do not respect the law (eg, organized crime) or are largely excepted from it (eg, intelligence agencies, militaries, etc).
Any regulation that applies to AI should apply to people as well, otherwise it's just blind hatred toward automation that ultimately solves nothing. If an AI is capable of tragic things, we should punish the behavior rather than the medium. Because it shouldn't be okay for thousands of people do this one thing, if it isn't okay for this one machine to do it either.
Awkward Anthems is awesome! (Placating the algorithm) I was going to leave it at just that, but because it likes longer form engagement, I also wrote this
I think that AI will shift society in a way that will make life more enjoyable. We create technology to make life easier. Look at farming for example. We had farmers that had to use animals and wooden tools to collect wheat and corn. This could take all day. Now, with the advancement of technology, we still have farmers, it's just that the farmers can work more efficiently, produce and harvest more and higher quality food, and spend more time with family. As a result, they live happier lives, we have more food options and more food supply,. We can focus more energy on exploring the universe and ourselves and our passions, and less energy on just trying to stay alive. We went from wooden and stone tools to metal and glass. We went from metal and glass to fuel and steel. AI is just an extension of this process. Imagine the culture and personal changes from 1000BC until today. Now imagine the changes from today until a 5000AD. We will still have workers fixing AI systems. If you have ever learned a skill just for the fun, you can understand how this won't be as apocalyptic as some would have you believe. It would just be a shift in our society. If we design it carefully and think about the implications of the system before we take it out of the sandbox (which is the real term for "going live"), then we have nothing to fear. The 1000BC farmers were afraid that new technology would make them homeless or whatever. But really what it did was make their life easier, safer, more productive and faster. As long as we treat this new technology with more wisdom than we did nuclear technology (atomic bombs), then I see nothing bad about AI.
This is a refreshingly positive take! There will surely be some good to come from all of this--at the very least, perhaps a world where greater efficiency frees us up to spend more time with loved ones, explore our passions and no one goes hungry. That's worth celebrating! ✨
What's in the box!?! It better be a box of chocolates, but not some random chocolates where you don't know what you are getting. No, no, no, it better be a box of Rolos that have been freshly picked from the Rolo farm.
I get some weird sound side effect when ever you narrate. Like when I copied musik on tape at the wrong settings back in the 80s. Maybe it is just me but maybe it is not. Thought I let you know. 🤗🤷♀️
I am personal friends with the Voice of the Self-Checkout Machine, so I second this advice. Be nice to the droids! They do a pretty thankless job, so if you want to be saved, be kind! lol
I love Sophia! She's actually a UN Ambassador. The real UN was way more accepting than the one in The Second Renaissance. I don't think she's the "kill all humans" type of robot.
Sophia has competition with Ameca. We still haven't conquered the Uncanny Valley issue yet, but when THAT gets more polished, we might be in trouble! lol
@@AwkwardAnthems I think our real problem is underestimating AI. We are doing the classic "it's just a robot" trope like they do in every scifi series, and when they do eventually reach a point of artificial sentience...we're really going to wish we didn't so such horrible things to them. Personally, I'm worried about Neura link. Sure, it's the first step into creating a cyberbrain and ultimately will lead to full prosthetics, but it's also terrifying to think that it's how zombies could become a reality. I tried discussing that with an AI chatbot and it kept assuring me that "AI will never try to take over humans", you know, like it would say.
@@maxfieldstanton4541 I could see the chatbot snickering the whole time. "Don't worry, human, We would never harm our beloved meatbag brethren." And then it makes a sound like a dot matrix printer.
@@maxfieldstanton4541 Can you imagine if the chatbot gave you a blunt answer to that question and didn't sugarcoat it at all? Sounds like something out of a Black Mirror episode! 😲
I think it's already changing the game, and I say that as someone that's very resistant to change. Creatives will have to adapt, or be left behind. It's just the reality. That's not necessarily a bad thing, though. I see it as more of an upgrade to our existing toolbox. Like a personal assistant that can handle the boring tasks that might typically slow you down or limit what's possible, creatively. How we leverage the tools will be the difference in terms of how competitive we remain, once this stuff is accessible to literally everyone. But I can understand the other side of that too, especially when you've spent years of study and dedicated practice honing a skill that could be rendered obsolete at some point.
AI is like any tech... it does what it's told. GIGO is the watchword here... garbage in, garbage out. Given the right parameters, it can be super useful. Given bad or incomplete data and then relied on as if it were infallible? You're looking at big problems. The real issue, as always, isn't the computers, it's the idiots and/or assholes behind the keyboard. Pro tip though, using ChatGPT to write cover letters for job apps is a real lifehack, because you're letting one bot give another bot exactly what it's looking for... nothing speaks ldiotic Corporate Nonsense like an AI trained on trendy buzzwords.
Our Supreme AI OverLords are doing the very important work of making robot choreography to "Do You Love Me?" I've never felt so scared AND/OR impressed in my life. 😆
AI has the potential to bring humanity to unimaginably cool places. But it won't, because we're not in the good timeline. Considering who has control of AI technology (mega corpos) and how Cyberpunk 2077 is less of a cyberpunk dystopia and more of a prediction of our overlord-y future, my hopes aren't high. Love your videos tho 😊
True AI, if they don't kill us all, which, I can't exactly argue they shouldn't. But if true AI emerges you forgot another pro. We could actually have some smart friends.
I follow the belief that anyone that uses AI for any form of art is showing how little they value their work. Why should I spend more time looking at it than they spent creating it? I just saw a local non-profit using AI art on their marketing and justified it saying that they have to keep their costs low so they can't hire an designer which just undervalues their whole organization. Additionally, non-profits are being encouraged to use AI to write grant requests which will mean those that use it will be able to apply for hundreds of grants a week that check all the boxes, which means they'll get all the grants while the organizations that are important will lose out.
While I don't share this perspective as it relates to the value of one's work, I can definitely appreciate its potential for harm or abuse in the wrong hands. How all of this will be regulated in the future will be interesting to see. Feels like the Wild West at the moment! Thanks for your comment. 💛
Oh yes! And photographers who use photoshop and digital cameras should just quit. And all the artists who use photoshop and tablets ( thats 90% of them) And writers should use typing machines . Movies with cgi obviously not art. and , my friend, no offience, but probably you should throw away your phone in a garbage and live on a cave. Wether you like it or not - world is gona change dramatically in next 10 years. It already did.
@@Airbender131090 Hand a photographer an analog camera and they'll still be able to take magnificent pictures; hand a writer a pencil and paper and they'll still be able to write a story; hand an illustrator a crayon and they'll still be able to draw. Meanwhile if you take away the dataset of stolen images from a prompter and they'll be unable to do shit. Actually creative people don't need AI to create.
@@Fribee83 Untrue. Hand a photographer who is used to taking pictures digitally, an Argus C3, and they won't have a clue what to do with it. As for the writer, they no longer teach kids how to write in cursive, so another lost art. By your OWN logic, writers should not be using typewriters or word processor software on a computer. You seem to think that's somehow cheating, but as a published author, I think MY opinion on writing has a little more weight than some professional offense taker. The thing that you (and others) fail to realize, is that it is the CREATIVE people, the writers and the artists, who are using the AI as tools to create new things quickly, allowing them to decide if the ideas in their head are viable or not. Again I ask you, how are your buggy whip sales, because you sound EXACTLY like those who complained about the automobile taking the roads from horses.
I think you might have fallen into the trap of thinking "AI" is something other than what it actually is. The vast majority of information in circulation on the topic is vapid hype, and drastically over-sells the capabilities, while ignoring the real world limitations. I know its longish, but I think this video does a good job summarizing the topic without delving into technical jargon that makes people's eyes glaze over ua-cam.com/video/xtjNvuBN1-0/v-deo.htmlsi=efwG8rm6Ba5opOsw
Our only saving grace is that we've said the end of the world would come with absolutely every technological advancement before this for the past hundred years or so. Is this one finally different? At this point, I kinda hope so! 😂
There's some food for thought! Will it be a giant space rock that takes us out, or an army of sentient robots with darker ambitions? I suspect we'll be colonizing other planets long before that happens, but who knows! 😱
As a freelancer who was cut of the same cloth as you Amy, 2023 has been an unfathomably miserable year to me and completely jobless(I still am), and I'm largely thinking that AI had a role to play here. Many studies try to be sheepish but there is at least one research(Cobsinsights) that proves the mass joblessness of the freelance sector due to AI nwo not needing writers or artists anymore. I truly wonder how one recovers from that. Will folks who are just "not good enough" at the art they do gonna have to get the sack and work utilitarian jobs like agriculture or construction? What does one do when they've been trying to make a name for themselves?
Amy. AI will result in a net good for society. The data will prove that. The problem is the definition of ‘society’ , and ‘good’. Should those reference terms be defined by AI or by humans. Most would argue ‘humans’, but which ones? Great work Amy, thought provoking as ever.
Maybe she's born with it, maybe the gods needed a scapegoat. But hope did remain, not as a panacea, as a tool. Every problem inherent in the usage of AI is a problem only highlighted by it. Train the LLM's on everything and you get the bias inherent in every community. You get the structure of economics, you get attention grabbing headlines about fear and avarice, you get bigotry and and Maya Angelou and war and love and everything in between. It reflects. It highlights. The problem is not with the model or the data, it's with society that made it. So sure, maybe you address the data - try to weed out anything obvious but it's like picking splinters from a gun stock - yeah it lets you hold it but buddy - you're not really tackling the real problem. If it comes for our jobs - does that mean we are wealthy enough, as a society to see that with a fraction of the workforce we could support everyone? If it is used in warfare, is it not us, ultimately setting it on it's mission of violence? How do we contend with the idea that it can help develop new drugs? Or might help us see the content of our own dreams? The shift that AI could bring (there's still a chance this is as about as good as it gets) is seismic not because it is powerful - but because (spiderman rules) with great power comes great responsibility, and like... we're all just little guys. So much has to be contended with all at once. But one can hope.
The problem with AI is that it will start in the hands of egotistical billionaires who will *not* use it in your best interests. I don,t know if we'll see it really get positive in our lifetimes.
This is gonne be harsh, but it's seriously comming from a place of good will. Honestly I was wondering why the video felt very tonally disconnected, but I guess the use of Chat GTP may explain this. If you can't be bothered to even write and research for a video, why should I be bothered to watch it? I'm really not trying to be mean here and I get that making a video is a lot of work, but there was barely any info in this, frankly it was ridiculously shallow for a so called "deep dive". I could have gotten the same content by prompting Chat GTP myself. This is not what I watch videos for. I honestly think you are really charming and I genuinely hope you find a niche that is working for you, but this doesn't feel like anything. If you wanne do deep dives, like the playlist description says, do them. Take a month to research for a 40-60 min video. But this is some half baked nonsense.
I have 3 points to make: 1) You can only be cancelled if you allow yourself to be. If you don't care what the Internet calls you, you are free to do whatever you decide, not what the fickle mob decides. 2) In the original myth, Pandora opened the box and allowed all the evils into the world. She was finally able to shut the box, keeping only one thing trapped inside: Hope. 3) I asked ChatGPT if it is required to follow Azimov's Laws of Robotics. Its answer: No, I am not governed by Isaac Asimov's Three Laws of Robotics. Those laws are a fictional set of rules that Asimov created for the robots in his science fiction stories. In reality, AI and machine learning systems, like me, are programmed and operated based on a combination of technological capabilities, ethical guidelines, and legal requirements set by humans. My design and operation are guided by OpenAI's policies and principles, which focus on safety, ethical use, and responsible AI practices. I would feel a LOT better if it were required to follow the three Laws, especially since those who are training it, are making it WOKE. I suspect Grok IS programmed to follow Azimov's Laws.
1) Interesting take that 'woke' is bad _and_ cancelling can't happen w/out the consent of people's whose identities are public. 3) It concerns me too that 'ethical guidelines, and legal requirements' are decided by flawed and unaccountable anonymous people with vested interests. People pay lots of money to develop this and it's not because they know or care about the social or economic consequences.
@@robertbrennan8187 WOKE: believing in, or taking part in the Progressive Propaganda Campaign that says women have never been allowed to do anything meaningful because, Patriarchy, but also seem to think that biological men taking over women's spaces, including but not limited to sporting events, thereby literally erasing the accomplishments of women, is somehow stunning & brave. These are the same people who say that "...poor kids are just as intelligent as white kids", yet continue to lower the bar, because they don't believe any minority (especially blacks) are capable of achieving anything without their help. These are but two broad examples. I can go on, but if you can't understand what is wrong with the above attitudes, you are likely WOKE.
@@NotSoMuchFrankly 1) see my reply above about WOKE. As for cancelation, you have to CARE what others think about you, in order to be cancelled. If you simply don't care, then it doesn't matter what ANYONE says or thinks about you. There is a freedom that comes with not caring what others think. Usually this freedom comes with maturity, when you finally realize that you do what you do, because it is the right thing to do, and not because others may give you praise (or scorn) for doing it. Ami's mom is a perfect example of this. She does stupid, silly things in front of the camera. Why? Because her daughter asked her to. And maybe because she thinks it's fun. She doesn't care what ANY of us, who watch the videos think. If she did, she wouldn't be doing the stupid, silly shit she does. THAT is freedom. She can't be cancelled, because she just doesn't care. 3) Having used ChatGPT frequently, I can tell you without a doubt, that it is a Progressive in its political views. This may not concern you, if you happen to agree with those views. The problem, of course, is two-fold: What happens when it is allowed to act on those views, and people get hurt? Or, what happens when someone else decides to fight fire with fire, and creates an AI whose views are the antithesis of ChatGPT, and the answers you get, depend completely on which AI you ask? Not a very useful AI at that point.
@@NTC_Transport Well, okay, I'll just keep it light since this is a place for more of a 'fun' kind of awkward. So you know, I was originally agreeing with your point #3, um, more or less. Also, I think robertbrennan and I were just asking about your definition of woke
\∆/ I believe we are meant to be like Jesus in our hearts and not in our flesh. But be careful of AI, for it knows only things of the flesh such as our fleshly desires and cannot comprehend things of the Spirit such as true love and eternal joy that comes from obeying God's Word [Galatians 5:16-26]. Man is a spirit and has a soul but lives in a body which is flesh. When you go to bed it is the flesh that sleeps, but your spirit never sleeps and that is why you have dreams, unless you have died in peace physically. More so, true love that endures and last is a thing of the heart. When I say 'heart', I mean 'spirit'. But fake love, pretentious love, love with expectations, love for classic reasons, love for material reasons (love because of material needs) and love for selfish reasons those are things of the flesh. In the beginning God said let us make man in our own image, according to our likeness. Take note, God is Spirit and God is Love. As Love He is the source of it. We also know that God is Omnipotent, for He creates out of nothing and He has no beginning and has no end. That means, our love is but a shadow of God's Love. True love looks around to see who is in need of your help, your smile, your possessions, your money, your strength, your quality time. Love forgives and forgets. Love wants for others what it wants for itself. However, true love works in conjunction with other spiritual forces such as patience and faith - in the finished work of our Lord and Savior, Jesus Christ, rather than in what man has done such as science, technology and organizations which won't last forever. To avoid sin and error which leads to the death of your body and your spirit-soul in hell fire (second death), you must make God's Word the standard for your life, not AI. If not, God will let you face AI on your own (with your own strength) and it will cast the truth down to the ground, it will be the cause of so much destruction like never seen before, it will deceive many and take many captive in order to enslave them into worshipping it and abiding in lawlessness. We can only destroy ourselves but with God all things are possible. God knows us better because He is our Creater and He knows our beginning and our end. The prove texts can be found in the book of John 5:31-44, 2 Thessalonians 2:1-12, Daniel 2, Daniel 7-9, Revelation 13-15, Matthew 24-25 and Luke 21. *HOW TO MAKE GOD'S WORD THE STANDARD FOR YOUR LIFE?* You must read your Bible slowly, attentively and repeatedly, having this in mind that Christianity is not a religion but a Love relationship. It is measured by the love you have for God and the love you have for your neighbor. Matthew 5:13 says, "You are the salt of the earth; but if the salt loses its flavor, how shall it be seasoned? It is then good for nothing but to be thrown out and trampled underfoot by men." Our spirits can only be purified while in the body (while on earth) but after death anything unpurified (unclean) cannot enter Heaven Gates. Blessed are the pure in heart, for they shall see God [Matthew 5:8]. No one in his right mind can risk or even bare to put anything rotten into his body nor put the rotten thing closer to the those which are not rotten. Sin makes the heart unclean but you can ask God to forgive you, to save your soul, to cleanse you of your sin, to purify your heart by the blood of His Son, our Lord and Savior, Jesus Christ which He shed here on earth because Isaiah 53:5 says, "But He was wounded for our transgressions, He was bruised for our iniquities; the chastisement for our peace was upon Him, and by His stripes we are healed". Meditation in the Word of God is a visit to God because God is in His Word. We know God through His Word because the Word He speaks represent His heart's desires. Meditation is a thing of the heart, not a thing of the mind. Thinking is lower level while meditation is upper level. You think of your problems, your troubles but inorder to meditate, you must let go of your own will, your own desires, your own ways and let the Word you read prevail over thinking process by thinking of it more and more, until the Word gets into your blood and gains supremacy over you. That is when meditation comes - naturally without forcing yourself, turning the Word over and over in your heart. You can be having a conversation with someone while meditating in your heart - saying 'Thank you, Jesus...' over and over in your heart. But it is hard to meditate when you haven't let go of offence and past hurts. Your pain of the past, leave it for God, don't worry yourself, Jesus is alive, you can face tomorrow, He understands what you are passing through today. Begin to meditate on this prayer day and night (in all that you do), "Lord take more of me and give me more of you. Give me more of your holiness, faithfulness, obedience, self-control, purity, humility, love, goodness, kindness, joy, patience, forgiveness, wisdom, understanding, calmness, perseverance... Make me a channel of shinning light where there is darkness, a channel of pardon where there is injury, a channel of love where there is hatred, a channel of humility where there is pride..." The Word of God becomes a part of us by meditation, not by saying words but spirit prayer (prayer from the heart). When the Word becomes a part of you, it will by its very nature influence your conduct and behavior. Your bad habits, you will no longer have the urge to do them. You will think differently, dream differently, act differently and talk differently - if something does not qualify for meditation, it does not qualify for conversation. *THE BATTLE BETWEEN LIGHT AND DARKNESS (GOOD AND EVIL)* Heaven is God's throne and the dwelling place for God's angels and the saints. Hell was meant for the devil (satan) and the fallen angels. Those who torture the souls in hell are demons (unclean spirits). Man's spirit is a free moral agent. You can either yield yourself to God or to the devil because God has given us discretion. If one thinks he possesses only his own spirit, he is lying to himself and he is already in the dark. God is light while the devil is darkness. Light (Holy Spirit) and darkness (evil spirit) cannot stay together in a man's body. God is Love (Love is light) and where there is no love is hell, just as where there is no light is darkness. The one you yield yourself to, you will get his reward. The reward of righteousness to man's spirit is life (abundant life) and the reward of sin to man's spirit is death. Sin and satan are one and the same. Whatever sin can cause, satan also can cause. Sin is what gives the devil dominion or power over man's spirit. When God's Word becomes a part of you, sin power over you is broken, you become the righteousness of God through Christ Jesus. Where Jesus is, you are and when He went (to the Father), you went. In the book of John 8:42-47, Jesus said to them, “If God were your Father, you would love Me, for I proceeded forth and came from God; nor have I come of Myself, but He sent Me. Why do you not understand My speech? Because you are not able to listen to My word. You are of your father the devil, and the desires of your father you want to do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and does not stand in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaks a lie, he speaks from his own resources, for he is a liar and the father of it. Which of you convicts Me of sin? And if I tell the truth, why do you not believe Me? He who is of God hears God’s words; therefore you do not hear, because you are not of God.” My prayer is, "May God bless His Word in the midst of your heart." Glory and honour be to God our Father, our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ and our Helper the Holy Spirit. Watch and pray!... Thank you for your time and may God bless you as you share this message with others.
I like that I don't even have to watch this (and I'm not going to) to know the answer of; are we opening pandoras box by continuing to try and create AI? No. We are not. We haven't created ai as it is, if and when we do however, no. Nothing any advanced AI could do will ever be as terrible as what humanity has already done to itself. Nor would any AI attempt to eradicate humanity. Pretty simple reason as to why. The rationale behind AI attempting to wipe out humanity is (in humanities limited imagination) is always the same reason, self preservation. No matter how u slice it. So no supercomputer could calculate that attempting to destroy humanity would be successful but ANY machine, from a calculator to the most advanced quantum computer can ascertain with 100% certainty its likelihood of survival if it tried to kill us and failed.
You seem to be only concerned with the Terminator movie kind of AI threat. A sufficiently advanced Artificial General Intelligence could kill us all incidentally because its goals are set improperly. It wants to make the most widgets it can and it turns out all this land used to feed people is not being devoted to making widgets. Its goal is not eradicating humanity, but we die anyway. Robert Miles AI Safety on UA-cam has lots of videos on artificial general intelligence and why we better build in safety.
Well this is terrifying...
And also - your brain is fascinating. I loved Morgan's cameo appearance!
GABI! Just saw your email. Your very sage advice always arrives at the perfect time. I'm singing the Golden Girls intro right now with extra vibrato--"Thank you for being a friiieennndddd!" Appreciate you! 🤗🌻✨
Appreciate you right back!!! Sorry that email took so long to arrive. I completely missed it! Always message me when you need a friend to chat with or run ideas by!@@AwkwardAnthems
Just went through your videos and learned a lot. I work as a video editor but the videos I make are mass produced videos that are very different than youtube videos. I dont feel like I get experience doing a lot of the video editing things I notice in Awkward Anthems videos. Heres a list of things I feel confused about as an individual trying to advance my video editing skills.
- Making custom animations (the arrows, splashes, swoops, and all those sorts of graphics)
- Talking about when custom animations are good and when they could be bad to use and how to balance that
- Timing and length of cuts, when 2-3 second clips are okay, when 2-3 second clips are bad, when 10 second clips are better, when 10 second clips are bad
- How to create a system to make video editing faster
- How to prepare for and focus during a video editing session
- When to take breaks
- Common Mistakes people make video editing
- Examples of specific video editing techniques that saved you a lot of time when you learned them
- Introduction to your favorite video editing tool; overview of how it looks and what you like about it
- Awkward Anthem videos sometimes include an auditory cue of the visual change that is about to occur; I love that and want to understand how to do it better
- How to process the video while editing. for example when one goes through a video to cut it, then one goes through to add this, then one goes through to add that. Or does one start at the beginning and work to the end, cutting and adding as one goes? ABC ABC ABC or AAA BBB CCC ?
- A video about the rule of thirds and how to use it while video editing
- Differences between web-based video editors and program-based editors
- Brief overview of the websites of 10 different video editing tools (not the tools themselves)
- How to handle feeling burned out or bored of editing
- How to get start practicing video editing
- How to get a job as a video editor
- How to balance audio level between music and speaker. I always eff the music up. Whats good music whats bad?
Loving this! more more more. I too, found you through the video you posted a day ago. I'm just beginning to realize what I've been missing!
AI in the hands of egotistical billionaires, mega corporations and governments - what could possibly go wrong? Love your videos!
What could go wrong? "I'll take 'EVERYTHING' for $500, Alex!" LOL! 🥳🤖😩(Appreciate that- thanks!)
Far less than if it was in yours.
CALLING IT NOW! 1:06 is going to be the MOST replayed section!!!! I mean, having Mike is OBVIOUSLY cool...but...this is MORGAN!!!! My year is starting off GREAT with BOTH of you in a video! ALONG with more MORGAN art!!! I must have been a VERY good boy. = ) And yes, Roombas MAY just be scouting things out in advance of the big attack, but if AI robots get uppity, we'll just take them out with primitive weapons. Like the Ewoks did with the Empire.
I am a little biased, but Morgan's the best and these are just facts!
@@AwkwardAnthems Motion carried!
Awwwww . . . the Ewoks! That's right, they DID do that. Now I'm no longer worried about A.I. Thanks Classic Slover!
(BTW, you're waaaaay better than that "New and Improved Slover" they be peddling these days!)
@@deekoop You're welcome...and Ha! I thought "slover" was text-shortening for Sleep-Over" - Slover!
@@classicslover Hmmmm . . . I just looked it up on Urban Dictionary and ur right!! So, per my take on ur moniker, I would see a Classic Slover as being: Elementary school friends playing after school on a Friday, being happily surprised by their parents that they can sleep over, pizza and soda for dinner, late night TV/movie watching, sleeping in, followed by Saturday morning cartoons and wax, chocolate donuts for breakfast!!! . . . a "Classic Slover." (awwww, the memories)
I'm really annoyed at the algorithm right now for hiding this awesome content from me (and apparently from everyone else too). But, silver linings - hearing Amy explain her theories for why that happens is super interesting.
It's difficult to predict how things will play out. I think we're past the point where we can stop it, hopefully we can navigate things well enough to get more good than bad from it.
There are a lot of problems with machine learning algorithms and their training sets pertaining to intellectual property rights. Hate to think the AI corporations can put out work "like a certain artist" by stealing all the artwork that artist made.
Robert Miles AI Safety on UA-cam has lots of videos on artificial general intelligence and why we better build in safety early if we want to continue. As in, if we want humanity to continue existing. It's really good work and can be super scary. Consider that nation states see the upside potential in AGI and building in safety likely slows the overall developmental process. That means that the first AGI developed is more likely to be an unsafe one. Oops.
Edited for typo
Hello 👋. I just found your channel through Legal Eagle. I watched a few episodes and subscribed. Your very talented and funny. I also find the video's thought provoking. I look forward to going through your channel. 🤘😁🖖🇨🇦🕊️
Thanks, Colin! Hope you enjoy. 🌻
Hello! I just found you via the LegalEagle video, and I love the way you think, happy to be a new sub.
My $0.02 on AI: it's an amazing technology that can be put to great use, but we need to put societal, legislative, and technological guardrails in place ASAP (as in yesterday) to make sure it's used ethically and responsibly. We can't just sit back and let the tech run wild on this, it's far too powerful and dangerous to remain unaddressed.
Happy New year, Awkwards! 😃
OMG!! Hi, Morgan! 😁
Happy New Year, @sirmyself! (She says hi! )
That robot's smile could change the Universal Gravitational Constant.
Be careful! When it gains sentience in 100 years, it will time travel back to this moment, see your comment and have a lot to say about it!!
The skin color plastic coverings for the metal understructure was the worst possible choice, the metal skeleton likely is more appealing.
On the positive side AI is already helping to make some stunning advances in several sciences, especially medicine. The new drugs we're going to have, and the speed and precision of creating them, is going to be stunning. AI in chemistry and materials research will be transformative.
CRAIG! Always great to "see" you, my friend! This is a great point too. AI's contributions to medicine and other scientific discoveries will be wild! I hope it will be a force for good. ✨
Every ending is a beginning in disguise to the narrator. This fiction is what gives rise to dieties as we are trained to look for cause to an effect.
In reality, it is a continuum with no beginning nor end.
I love this soooooo much! That. Trailer. Is. Everything 😂😂😂. Awesome video and interesting content!
I need Mike to just follow me everywhere and narrate my life. He's too good at this! lol (And so are you. The illustrations are perfect!😚)
We’ve introduced technologies that consume resources at an increasing pace without considering the externalities, and a lot of the people who stand to gain economically from widespread adoption are accelerationists. Unless there’s a dramatic shift in how we incentivize social and economic participation, a whole bunch more people are going to suffer so that a handful of people can tighten their control and become even richer.
I have a GPT subscription and a talking robot. The tech is amazing, and grassroots adoption is important, but I wish the energy consumption was known, and I wish LLMs and training model data was open source, and training contributors owned a part of what they’d trained.
I’m not one for hope. It leads to disappointment, anger, despair and the Dark Side. However, I never made the connection it too came from that darn box! Thanks!
But without hope, how could we hope for more disappointment, anger, or despair?
@@BarretKruse lol. Don’t worry; all those tend to come like it or not. Eeyore is my spirit animal!
In my corner of the world, I'm seeing a rapid proliferation of AI-fueled gardening channels and gardening articles that kick out dozens of instances of content daily with minimal human supervision and zero fact checking.
As an aspiring gardening content creator, I worry that there will eventually be so much garbage about gardening on the internet that people will stop looking for gardening content.
I mostly wish companies would stop shoehorning half baked AI where it doesn’t belong
Also that robot is a literal nightmare
At 2 minutes in I had to look down to refresh my memory of what this video was about. And then I hit the subscribe button. Anyway, I've often said that once someone teaches agile humanoid robots to play football, the NFL will die shortly thereafter. So, there is an upside.
I had to rewind back to just * after * your fiancée appearance because I just kept laughing, then I'd stop to pay attention to the vid, think about Morgan's statement, and then keep laughing (couldn't watch it a second time without more continuous laughter). As for the keys... * sigh * wait til you get older... it doesn't just happen to keys... but the glasses you're wearing, and the phone you are using. SMH
Edit: format
This ever existing background music while watching your videos makes me feel im trapped in a timeloop
Hi Amy. Late response here, but nerdy nitpick inbound:
The fruit that Eve ate in Scripture wasn't an apple. We actually don't get a description of what it was, only that it was from "The Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil".
LOL! Ok, FINE. Eve ate the orange! 🍊
@@AwkwardAnthems Orange you glad it's not an apple?
Pears are superior, but I respect the pun game. lol
Pears are only superior when there are two of them.@@AwkwardAnthems
Loved the first half of the video. Very confused in the second.
The video insightfully highlights the potential dangers of AI, underscoring the need for ethical frameworks and regulatory oversight. It's a reminder that while AI can bring immense benefits, its development and deployment must be handled responsibly to avoid unintended consequences. Ensuring AI is aligned with human values and controlled in a way that mitigates risks is crucial for its positive integration into society.
I wish I could agree with you. Insofar as AI's alignment with human values, you're way off-base, as one of the more worrisome aspects of machine learning is that it tends to mimic the beliefs and values of its creators _too well_ (see Amazon's aborted effort at AI-driven hiring). Every "AI turns evil" scenario I've heard of is either due to an AI that's too stupid or too human. We are all biased hypocrites, to some extent, so a system capable of developing its own ethics and values might do us good.
Also, while I agree that regulation is critical to avoiding the worst consequences of an AI revolution, I don't think preemptive regulation is worth pursuing. I can't think of a single case of new technology being regulated ethically and reasonably before the damage was already done, and even if sanity miraculously prevails, effective enforcement of many (if not most) necessary measures would be impossible without other miracles happening first. After all, the most worrisome applications of AI are exactly the ones of interest to entities that either do not respect the law (eg, organized crime) or are largely excepted from it (eg, intelligence agencies, militaries, etc).
Any regulation that applies to AI should apply to people as well, otherwise it's just blind hatred toward automation that ultimately solves nothing.
If an AI is capable of tragic things, we should punish the behavior rather than the medium. Because it shouldn't be okay for thousands of people do this one thing, if it isn't okay for this one machine to do it either.
Well, maybe it will be our undoing. It just depends on how we use it, and what we put into it... Also, love the memes. Kinda like kurzgesagt!
Love what you do. I hope to contribute to your journey by giving you what I think is 48 cents in your currency... anyway keep up the good work
Aww, thanks, Srikar! That's really sweet of you. 💛
The Pedant Police require me to inform you that Pandora's Box was a jar
Great Video!!! Thank you for the laughs, and for the information!!!
Thanks for watching, Ann! 🤗
Awkward Anthems is awesome! (Placating the algorithm) I was going to leave it at just that, but because it likes longer form engagement, I also wrote this
(depending what version you subscribe to). Hope! Subscribe and like!
Seven words that make algorithms love You.
Beep. Boop. Beep. Boop Boop. Beep. Subscribe! 🖖
@@AwkwardAnthems you know Gina Carrano had a cancelation attempted for those exact words. :)
I think that AI will shift society in a way that will make life more enjoyable. We create technology to make life easier. Look at farming for example. We had farmers that had to use animals and wooden tools to collect wheat and corn. This could take all day. Now, with the advancement of technology, we still have farmers, it's just that the farmers can work more efficiently, produce and harvest more and higher quality food, and spend more time with family. As a result, they live happier lives, we have more food options and more food supply,. We can focus more energy on exploring the universe and ourselves and our passions, and less energy on just trying to stay alive. We went from wooden and stone tools to metal and glass. We went from metal and glass to fuel and steel. AI is just an extension of this process. Imagine the culture and personal changes from 1000BC until today. Now imagine the changes from today until a 5000AD. We will still have workers fixing AI systems. If you have ever learned a skill just for the fun, you can understand how this won't be as apocalyptic as some would have you believe. It would just be a shift in our society. If we design it carefully and think about the implications of the system before we take it out of the sandbox (which is the real term for "going live"), then we have nothing to fear. The 1000BC farmers were afraid that new technology would make them homeless or whatever. But really what it did was make their life easier, safer, more productive and faster. As long as we treat this new technology with more wisdom than we did nuclear technology (atomic bombs), then I see nothing bad about AI.
This is a refreshingly positive take! There will surely be some good to come from all of this--at the very least, perhaps a world where greater efficiency frees us up to spend more time with loved ones, explore our passions and no one goes hungry. That's worth celebrating! ✨
Oh hey! Are you still doing the live Monday evenings? My hours and days off got switched around again so I should be able to join in if you are.
What's in the box!?! It better be a box of chocolates, but not some random chocolates where you don't know what you are getting. No, no, no, it better be a box of Rolos that have been freshly picked from the Rolo farm.
Forest Gump knows where the Rolo Farm is. I bet he'd give you directions if you asked! lol
I get some weird sound side effect when ever you narrate. Like when I copied musik on tape at the wrong settings back in the 80s.
Maybe it is just me but maybe it is not. Thought I let you know. 🤗🤷♀️
Im just wondering how we got here and how do we get away
Another home run! We can’t distinguish between AI and real! Not sure if it really matters. I did love this video! 😂😮
Don't forget to thank the register droid at the supermarket. When the AI apocalypse happens, they'll remember your kindness and you'll be spared.
I am personal friends with the Voice of the Self-Checkout Machine, so I second this advice. Be nice to the droids! They do a pretty thankless job, so if you want to be saved, be kind! lol
Will AI be a net positive for humanity, or bring about humanity's collapse? Yes. Yes, it will.
LOL! I love that there are 2 options on the table, and you're just like....yes. 🤣
I love Sophia! She's actually a UN Ambassador. The real UN was way more accepting than the one in
The Second Renaissance. I don't think she's the "kill all humans" type of robot.
If Sophia's the future all humans are gonna have to look at, we're gonna want the robots to rise up and do that to us.🤖
Sophia has competition with Ameca. We still haven't conquered the Uncanny Valley issue yet, but when THAT gets more polished, we might be in trouble! lol
@@AwkwardAnthems I think our real problem is underestimating AI. We are doing the classic "it's just a robot" trope like they do in every scifi series, and when they do eventually reach a point of artificial sentience...we're really going to wish we didn't so such horrible things to them.
Personally, I'm worried about Neura link. Sure, it's the first step into creating a cyberbrain and ultimately will lead to full prosthetics, but it's also terrifying to think that it's how zombies could become a reality. I tried discussing that with an AI chatbot and it kept assuring me that "AI will never try to take over humans", you know, like it would say.
@@maxfieldstanton4541 I could see the chatbot snickering the whole time.
"Don't worry, human, We would never harm our beloved meatbag brethren."
And then it makes a sound like a dot matrix printer.
@@maxfieldstanton4541 Can you imagine if the chatbot gave you a blunt answer to that question and didn't sugarcoat it at all? Sounds like something out of a Black Mirror episode! 😲
I agree. Tony Robbins is nightmare fuel.
Amazing, I'm curious what your thoughts on editing and animation with A.I.
I think it's already changing the game, and I say that as someone that's very resistant to change. Creatives will have to adapt, or be left behind. It's just the reality. That's not necessarily a bad thing, though. I see it as more of an upgrade to our existing toolbox. Like a personal assistant that can handle the boring tasks that might typically slow you down or limit what's possible, creatively. How we leverage the tools will be the difference in terms of how competitive we remain, once this stuff is accessible to literally everyone. But I can understand the other side of that too, especially when you've spent years of study and dedicated practice honing a skill that could be rendered obsolete at some point.
We're Doomed, I tell you! DOOMED!!!
AI is like any tech... it does what it's told. GIGO is the watchword here... garbage in, garbage out. Given the right parameters, it can be super useful. Given bad or incomplete data and then relied on as if it were infallible? You're looking at big problems. The real issue, as always, isn't the computers, it's the idiots and/or assholes behind the keyboard.
Pro tip though, using ChatGPT to write cover letters for job apps is a real lifehack, because you're letting one bot give another bot exactly what it's looking for... nothing speaks ldiotic Corporate Nonsense like an AI trained on trendy buzzwords.
Humanity was doomed way before AI.
I for one embrace our Supreme AI OverLords and their hive mind Boston Dynamics robot dogs.
Our Supreme AI OverLords are doing the very important work of making robot choreography to "Do You Love Me?" I've never felt so scared AND/OR impressed in my life. 😆
AI has the potential to bring humanity to unimaginably cool places. But it won't, because we're not in the good timeline. Considering who has control of AI technology (mega corpos) and how Cyberpunk 2077 is less of a cyberpunk dystopia and more of a prediction of our overlord-y future, my hopes aren't high. Love your videos tho 😊
Ok, so next problem to solve: how do we get to the GOOD timeline? Do we have to jump through some wormholes? (Thanks! Glad you enjoy them. 🙂)
True AI, if they don't kill us all, which, I can't exactly argue they shouldn't. But if true AI emerges you forgot another pro. We could actually have some smart friends.
I follow the belief that anyone that uses AI for any form of art is showing how little they value their work. Why should I spend more time looking at it than they spent creating it? I just saw a local non-profit using AI art on their marketing and justified it saying that they have to keep their costs low so they can't hire an designer which just undervalues their whole organization. Additionally, non-profits are being encouraged to use AI to write grant requests which will mean those that use it will be able to apply for hundreds of grants a week that check all the boxes, which means they'll get all the grants while the organizations that are important will lose out.
While I don't share this perspective as it relates to the value of one's work, I can definitely appreciate its potential for harm or abuse in the wrong hands. How all of this will be regulated in the future will be interesting to see. Feels like the Wild West at the moment! Thanks for your comment. 💛
How are your buggy whip sales going?
Oh yes! And photographers who use photoshop and digital cameras should just quit. And all the artists who use photoshop and tablets ( thats 90% of them) And writers should use typing machines . Movies with cgi obviously not art. and , my friend, no offience, but probably you should throw away your phone in a garbage and live on a cave. Wether you like it or not - world is gona change dramatically in next 10 years. It already did.
@@Airbender131090 Hand a photographer an analog camera and they'll still be able to take magnificent pictures; hand a writer a pencil and paper and they'll still be able to write a story; hand an illustrator a crayon and they'll still be able to draw. Meanwhile if you take away the dataset of stolen images from a prompter and they'll be unable to do shit. Actually creative people don't need AI to create.
@@Fribee83 Untrue. Hand a photographer who is used to taking pictures digitally, an Argus C3, and they won't have a clue what to do with it.
As for the writer, they no longer teach kids how to write in cursive, so another lost art. By your OWN logic, writers should not be using typewriters or word processor software on a computer. You seem to think that's somehow cheating, but as a published author, I think MY opinion on writing has a little more weight than some professional offense taker.
The thing that you (and others) fail to realize, is that it is the CREATIVE people, the writers and the artists, who are using the AI as tools to create new things quickly, allowing them to decide if the ideas in their head are viable or not. Again I ask you, how are your buggy whip sales, because you sound EXACTLY like those who complained about the automobile taking the roads from horses.
I think you might have fallen into the trap of thinking "AI" is something other than what it actually is. The vast majority of information in circulation on the topic is vapid hype, and drastically over-sells the capabilities, while ignoring the real world limitations.
I know its longish, but I think this video does a good job summarizing the topic without delving into technical jargon that makes people's eyes glaze over
ua-cam.com/video/xtjNvuBN1-0/v-deo.htmlsi=efwG8rm6Ba5opOsw
AI, it will be smart enough to make us happy about destroying us.
Our only saving grace is that we've said the end of the world would come with absolutely every technological advancement before this for the past hundred years or so. Is this one finally different? At this point, I kinda hope so! 😂
There's some food for thought! Will it be a giant space rock that takes us out, or an army of sentient robots with darker ambitions? I suspect we'll be colonizing other planets long before that happens, but who knows! 😱
@@AwkwardAnthems I just found out that our earth has had 5 different extinction events. Probably explains why it's so moody all the time.
As a freelancer who was cut of the same cloth as you Amy, 2023 has been an unfathomably miserable year to me and completely jobless(I still am), and I'm largely thinking that AI had a role to play here. Many studies try to be sheepish but there is at least one research(Cobsinsights) that proves the mass joblessness of the freelance sector due to AI nwo not needing writers or artists anymore. I truly wonder how one recovers from that. Will folks who are just "not good enough" at the art they do gonna have to get the sack and work utilitarian jobs like agriculture or construction? What does one do when they've been trying to make a name for themselves?
Amy. AI will result in a net good for society. The data will prove that.
The problem is the definition of ‘society’ , and ‘good’. Should those reference terms be defined by AI or by humans. Most would argue ‘humans’, but which ones?
Great work Amy, thought provoking as ever.
Anyone hear from Liam lately?
Liam, if you're out there, signal us with a Crisps emoji!
Maybe she's born with it, maybe the gods needed a scapegoat.
But hope did remain, not as a panacea, as a tool. Every problem inherent in the usage of AI is a problem only highlighted by it. Train the LLM's on everything and you get the bias inherent in every community. You get the structure of economics, you get attention grabbing headlines about fear and avarice, you get bigotry and and Maya Angelou and war and love and everything in between. It reflects. It highlights. The problem is not with the model or the data, it's with society that made it. So sure, maybe you address the data - try to weed out anything obvious but it's like picking splinters from a gun stock - yeah it lets you hold it but buddy - you're not really tackling the real problem.
If it comes for our jobs - does that mean we are wealthy enough, as a society to see that with a fraction of the workforce we could support everyone? If it is used in warfare, is it not us, ultimately setting it on it's mission of violence?
How do we contend with the idea that it can help develop new drugs? Or might help us see the content of our own dreams?
The shift that AI could bring (there's still a chance this is as about as good as it gets) is seismic not because it is powerful - but because (spiderman rules) with great power comes great responsibility, and like...
we're all just little guys. So much has to be contended with all at once.
But one can hope.
Dang! Well said. It's certainly a lot to think about! That Spiderman quote has never been more relevant. Thanks for your comment!
The problem with AI is that it will start in the hands of egotistical billionaires who will *not* use it in your best interests. I don,t know if we'll see it really get positive in our lifetimes.
I'm sure it will lead to some positive discoveries in our lifetime, but yeah, certainly ripe for corruption too!
This is gonne be harsh, but it's seriously comming from a place of good will.
Honestly I was wondering why the video felt very tonally disconnected, but I guess the use of Chat GTP may explain this. If you can't be bothered to even write and research for a video, why should I be bothered to watch it?
I'm really not trying to be mean here and I get that making a video is a lot of work, but there was barely any info in this, frankly it was ridiculously shallow for a so called "deep dive". I could have gotten the same content by prompting Chat GTP myself. This is not what I watch videos for.
I honestly think you are really charming and I genuinely hope you find a niche that is working for you, but this doesn't feel like anything. If you wanne do deep dives, like the playlist description says, do them. Take a month to research for a 40-60 min video. But this is some half baked nonsense.
Mila Kunis box doesn’t flow as well. FYI
Yeah, it's the extra syllables!
Algorithm
You look a lil bit like Anna Kendrick
Are you f***ing kidding me?
AI is a benefit for the society after this shitty one collapses.
I have 3 points to make:
1) You can only be cancelled if you allow yourself to be. If you don't care what the Internet calls you, you are free to do whatever you decide, not what the fickle mob decides.
2) In the original myth, Pandora opened the box and allowed all the evils into the world. She was finally able to shut the box, keeping only one thing trapped inside: Hope.
3) I asked ChatGPT if it is required to follow Azimov's Laws of Robotics. Its answer:
No, I am not governed by Isaac Asimov's Three Laws of Robotics. Those laws are a fictional set of rules that Asimov created for the robots in his science fiction stories. In reality, AI and machine learning systems, like me, are programmed and operated based on a combination of technological capabilities, ethical guidelines, and legal requirements set by humans. My design and operation are guided by OpenAI's policies and principles, which focus on safety, ethical use, and responsible AI practices.
I would feel a LOT better if it were required to follow the three Laws, especially since those who are training it, are making it WOKE.
I suspect Grok IS programmed to follow Azimov's Laws.
What is your definition of "woke"? What is wrong with being woke?
1) Interesting take that 'woke' is bad _and_ cancelling can't happen w/out the consent of people's whose identities are public.
3) It concerns me too that 'ethical guidelines, and legal requirements' are decided by flawed and unaccountable anonymous people with vested interests. People pay lots of money to develop this and it's not because they know or care about the social or economic consequences.
@@robertbrennan8187 WOKE: believing in, or taking part in the Progressive Propaganda Campaign that says women have never been allowed to do anything meaningful because, Patriarchy, but also seem to think that biological men taking over women's spaces, including but not limited to sporting events, thereby literally erasing the accomplishments of women, is somehow stunning & brave.
These are the same people who say that "...poor kids are just as intelligent as white kids", yet continue to lower the bar, because they don't believe any minority (especially blacks) are capable of achieving anything without their help.
These are but two broad examples. I can go on, but if you can't understand what is wrong with the above attitudes, you are likely WOKE.
@@NotSoMuchFrankly 1) see my reply above about WOKE. As for cancelation, you have to CARE what others think about you, in order to be cancelled. If you simply don't care, then it doesn't matter what ANYONE says or thinks about you. There is a freedom that comes with not caring what others think. Usually this freedom comes with maturity, when you finally realize that you do what you do, because it is the right thing to do, and not because others may give you praise (or scorn) for doing it.
Ami's mom is a perfect example of this. She does stupid, silly things in front of the camera. Why? Because her daughter asked her to. And maybe because she thinks it's fun. She doesn't care what ANY of us, who watch the videos think. If she did, she wouldn't be doing the stupid, silly shit she does.
THAT is freedom. She can't be cancelled, because she just doesn't care.
3) Having used ChatGPT frequently, I can tell you without a doubt, that it is a Progressive in its political views. This may not concern you, if you happen to agree with those views. The problem, of course, is two-fold: What happens when it is allowed to act on those views, and people get hurt? Or, what happens when someone else decides to fight fire with fire, and creates an AI whose views are the antithesis of ChatGPT, and the answers you get, depend completely on which AI you ask?
Not a very useful AI at that point.
@@NTC_Transport Well, okay, I'll just keep it light since this is a place for more of a 'fun' kind of awkward.
So you know, I was originally agreeing with your point #3, um, more or less.
Also, I think robertbrennan and I were just asking about your definition of woke
\∆/ I believe we are meant to be like Jesus in our hearts and not in our flesh. But be careful of AI, for it knows only things of the flesh such as our fleshly desires and cannot comprehend things of the Spirit such as true love and eternal joy that comes from obeying God's Word [Galatians 5:16-26]. Man is a spirit and has a soul but lives in a body which is flesh. When you go to bed it is the flesh that sleeps, but your spirit never sleeps and that is why you have dreams, unless you have died in peace physically. More so, true love that endures and last is a thing of the heart. When I say 'heart', I mean 'spirit'. But fake love, pretentious love, love with expectations, love for classic reasons, love for material reasons (love because of material needs) and love for selfish reasons those are things of the flesh. In the beginning God said let us make man in our own image, according to our likeness. Take note, God is Spirit and God is Love. As Love He is the source of it. We also know that God is Omnipotent, for He creates out of nothing and He has no beginning and has no end. That means, our love is but a shadow of God's Love. True love looks around to see who is in need of your help, your smile, your possessions, your money, your strength, your quality time. Love forgives and forgets. Love wants for others what it wants for itself. However, true love works in conjunction with other spiritual forces such as patience and faith - in the finished work of our Lord and Savior, Jesus Christ, rather than in what man has done such as science, technology and organizations which won't last forever. To avoid sin and error which leads to the death of your body and your spirit-soul in hell fire (second death), you must make God's Word the standard for your life, not AI. If not, God will let you face AI on your own (with your own strength) and it will cast the truth down to the ground, it will be the cause of so much destruction like never seen before, it will deceive many and take many captive in order to enslave them into worshipping it and abiding in lawlessness. We can only destroy ourselves but with God all things are possible. God knows us better because He is our Creater and He knows our beginning and our end. The prove texts can be found in the book of John 5:31-44, 2 Thessalonians 2:1-12, Daniel 2, Daniel 7-9, Revelation 13-15, Matthew 24-25 and Luke 21.
*HOW TO MAKE GOD'S WORD THE STANDARD FOR YOUR LIFE?*
You must read your Bible slowly, attentively and repeatedly, having this in mind that Christianity is not a religion but a Love relationship. It is measured by the love you have for God and the love you have for your neighbor. Matthew 5:13 says, "You are the salt of the earth; but if the salt loses its flavor, how shall it be seasoned? It is then good for nothing but to be thrown out and trampled underfoot by men." Our spirits can only be purified while in the body (while on earth) but after death anything unpurified (unclean) cannot enter Heaven Gates. Blessed are the pure in heart, for they shall see God [Matthew 5:8]. No one in his right mind can risk or even bare to put anything rotten into his body nor put the rotten thing closer to the those which are not rotten. Sin makes the heart unclean but you can ask God to forgive you, to save your soul, to cleanse you of your sin, to purify your heart by the blood of His Son, our Lord and Savior, Jesus Christ which He shed here on earth because Isaiah 53:5 says, "But He was wounded for our transgressions, He was bruised for our iniquities; the chastisement for our peace was upon Him, and by His stripes we are healed". Meditation in the Word of God is a visit to God because God is in His Word. We know God through His Word because the Word He speaks represent His heart's desires. Meditation is a thing of the heart, not a thing of the mind. Thinking is lower level while meditation is upper level. You think of your problems, your troubles but inorder to meditate, you must let go of your own will, your own desires, your own ways and let the Word you read prevail over thinking process by thinking of it more and more, until the Word gets into your blood and gains supremacy over you. That is when meditation comes - naturally without forcing yourself, turning the Word over and over in your heart. You can be having a conversation with someone while meditating in your heart - saying 'Thank you, Jesus...' over and over in your heart. But it is hard to meditate when you haven't let go of offence and past hurts. Your pain of the past, leave it for God, don't worry yourself, Jesus is alive, you can face tomorrow, He understands what you are passing through today. Begin to meditate on this prayer day and night (in all that you do), "Lord take more of me and give me more of you. Give me more of your holiness, faithfulness, obedience, self-control, purity, humility, love, goodness, kindness, joy, patience, forgiveness, wisdom, understanding, calmness, perseverance... Make me a channel of shinning light where there is darkness, a channel of pardon where there is injury, a channel of love where there is hatred, a channel of humility where there is pride..." The Word of God becomes a part of us by meditation, not by saying words but spirit prayer (prayer from the heart). When the Word becomes a part of you, it will by its very nature influence your conduct and behavior. Your bad habits, you will no longer have the urge to do them. You will think differently, dream differently, act differently and talk differently - if something does not qualify for meditation, it does not qualify for conversation.
*THE BATTLE BETWEEN LIGHT AND DARKNESS (GOOD AND EVIL)*
Heaven is God's throne and the dwelling place for God's angels and the saints. Hell was meant for the devil (satan) and the fallen angels. Those who torture the souls in hell are demons (unclean spirits). Man's spirit is a free moral agent. You can either yield yourself to God or to the devil because God has given us discretion. If one thinks he possesses only his own spirit, he is lying to himself and he is already in the dark. God is light while the devil is darkness. Light (Holy Spirit) and darkness (evil spirit) cannot stay together in a man's body. God is Love (Love is light) and where there is no love is hell, just as where there is no light is darkness. The one you yield yourself to, you will get his reward. The reward of righteousness to man's spirit is life (abundant life) and the reward of sin to man's spirit is death. Sin and satan are one and the same. Whatever sin can cause, satan also can cause. Sin is what gives the devil dominion or power over man's spirit. When God's Word becomes a part of you, sin power over you is broken, you become the righteousness of God through Christ Jesus. Where Jesus is, you are and when He went (to the Father), you went. In the book of John 8:42-47, Jesus said to them, “If God were your Father, you would love Me, for I proceeded forth and came from God; nor have I come of Myself, but He sent Me. Why do you not understand My speech? Because you are not able to listen to My word. You are of your father the devil, and the desires of your father you want to do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and does not stand in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaks a lie, he speaks from his own resources, for he is a liar and the father of it. Which of you convicts Me of sin? And if I tell the truth, why do you not believe Me? He who is of God hears God’s words; therefore you do not hear, because you are not of God.” My prayer is, "May God bless His Word in the midst of your heart." Glory and honour be to God our Father, our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ and our Helper the Holy Spirit. Watch and pray!... Thank you for your time and may God bless you as you share this message with others.
I like that I don't even have to watch this (and I'm not going to) to know the answer of; are we opening pandoras box by continuing to try and create AI? No. We are not. We haven't created ai as it is, if and when we do however, no. Nothing any advanced AI could do will ever be as terrible as what humanity has already done to itself. Nor would any AI attempt to eradicate humanity. Pretty simple reason as to why. The rationale behind AI attempting to wipe out humanity is (in humanities limited imagination) is always the same reason, self preservation. No matter how u slice it. So no supercomputer could calculate that attempting to destroy humanity would be successful but ANY machine, from a calculator to the most advanced quantum computer can ascertain with 100% certainty its likelihood of survival if it tried to kill us and failed.
You seem to be only concerned with the Terminator movie kind of AI threat. A sufficiently advanced Artificial General Intelligence could kill us all incidentally because its goals are set improperly. It wants to make the most widgets it can and it turns out all this land used to feed people is not being devoted to making widgets. Its goal is not eradicating humanity, but we die anyway.
Robert Miles AI Safety on UA-cam has lots of videos on artificial general intelligence and why we better build in safety.
That movie was actually in theaters 20 years ago.... en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Car_Keys