Professor Mary Beard addresses 'Who owns the past?' An Octavia Hill Lecture with the National Trust
Вставка
- Опубліковано 21 бер 2024
- Join guest speaker, Professor Mary Beard, a leading classicist, historian, author and broadcaster, as she focuses on the historic houses and collections in the care of the National Trust. This is the second annual Octavia Hill Lecture from the National Trust, in collaboration with Times Radio.
Professor Beard asks ‘Who owns the past?’ She examines what the past is for, how we can learn from and challenge it, and how we can bring it to life. Throughout her lecture, Professor Beard considers issues of authenticity and ownership and questions who makes the decisions about collection displays. She looks at how the past is reconstructed and how it's discussed and presented.
Professor Beard uses the National Trust and the historic houses in our care as a gateway to speak on wider debates around history, heritage and ownership, and to shed a light on what the past says about society and the wider world.
The histories, people and artefacts explored in this talk are drawn from a variety of the places in our care, including Dyrham Park in Gloucestershire, Wimpole in Cambridgeshire and The Children’s Country House at Sudbury in Derbyshire.
This lecture was recorded in front of a live audience on 19 March 2024 at The Royal Society, London, UK. We’re working in collaboration with Times Radio to bring history to everyone. Times Radio provides intelligent and thought-provoking live coverage of news, politics and culture. Together, through this series of annual lectures, respected voices and commentators lead us in reflecting on nature, beauty and history.
For more information about Times Radio, you can find it on their website.
Selective Bibliography for ‘Who owns the past?’ recommended by Professor Mary Beard as follows, or visit
www.nationaltrust.org.uk/disc...
Jennifer Jenkins and Patrick James, From Acorn to Oak Tree: Growth of the National Trust, 1895-1994
John Gaze and Len Clark, Figures in a Landscape: History of the National Trust
Paula Weidegger, Gilding the Acorn: Behind the Facade of the National Trust
R. Fedden, The Continuing Purpose: A History of the National Trust, its Aims and Work
Merlin Waterson, The National Trust: The First Hundred Years
Howard Newby (ed), The National Trust: the next hundred years
More specialised and academic contributions include:
Elizabeth Baigent and Ben Clarke (eds), Octavia Hill, social activism and the remaking of British society
Melanie Hall, ‘The Politics of Collecting: the early aspirations of the National Trust, 1883-1913’, Transactions of the Royal Historical Society 13 (2003), 345-57
Gillian Darley, Octavia Hill: a life
C. R. Ashbee and the Guild of Handicraft (Cheltenham Art Gallery)
Patrick Wright, A Journey through Ruins
Patrick Wright, On Living in an Old County
Peter Mandler, The Fall and Rise of the Stately Home
Polly Bagnall and Sally Beck, Ferguson's Gang: The Remarkable Story of the National Trust Gangsters
Anna Hutton-North, Ferguson's Gang - The Maidens behind the Masks
Adrian Tinniswood, A History of Country House Visiting
Stephanie Barczewski, Country Houses and the British Empire, 1700-1930
Important ‘primary’ texts include:
Clough Williams-Ellis, On Trust For The Nation
C. R. Ashbee, American Sheaves & English Seed Corn: Being a Series of Addresses Mainly Delivered in the United States, 1900-1901.
G. M. Trevelyan, Must England's Beauty Perish?: A Plea on Behalf of the National Trust for Places of Historic Interest or Natural Beauty
Lord Montagu of Beaulieu, The Gilt and the Gingerbread
We protect and care for places so people and nature can thrive. Everyone can get involved, everyone can make a difference. Nature, beauty, history. For everyone, for ever. You can donate to us at www.nationaltrust.org.uk/donate
Find things to do near you: www.nationaltrust.org.uk/sear...
Like us on Facebook: / nationaltrust
Follow us on Instagram: / nationaltrust
Follow us on Twitter: / nationaltrust
www.nationaltrust.org.uk/donate
This was a wonderful presentation! I'm just finishing my undergraduate thesis on Country Houses, the Interim Report, and cultural politics in places of collective heritage. You've arrived at many of the same conclusions I have and spoken them very well. I'm glad to see the trust continuing to open up conversations and new approaches in their properties to make the past come alive for newer generations. Professor Beard's point on explicitly instructing thought as being as exclusionary as red ropes was very well put!
We're glad you enjoyed this presentation
much appreciated and enjoyed.....
Thank you for your support!
I found one of the speakers statement interesting. The Trust complained about the original owner of Stonehenge surrounding it with barbed wire and charging 5d. Going there last year I found it was surround with wire and they were charging 25.00 pounds.
We don't know how 5d back then compares with £25 now but Stonehenge circle is owned and managed by English Heritage. They allow National Trust members to enter for free. The surrounding landscape is looked after by the National Trust and is free to access.
I had been a member of the NT for over 30 years, sadly no more. 'National Trust" is more concerned with a Globalist agenda. I would encourage anyone still contributing to withdraw your support now.
You have posted identical comments on several unrelated videos. This makes you sound like a bot.
I couldn’t agree with you less. In fact, I have just joined. History is written by the victors and thus should not be set in stone. If it concerns an empire then it should always be reassessed not only when new evidence comes to light, but also from the perspective of those affected by it.
@@Worldtree-dw5dt Guilty as charged.
@@susanbloor8541 Someone swallowed the little red book.
@@eilidh771 It’s always sad when someone feels so threatened by a different perspective that they cannot engage and resort to stereotyping. Ive said that I disagree with you: I didn’t cast aspersions or make assumptions about your political ideology. In this instance you could not be more wrong.
Anyone watching the videos online, reading the seasonal magazine or visiting any of the houses, can clearly see the obnoxious and encroaching DEI agenda. I don't think it's appropriate to lecture at the membership, to tell them it isn't happening.
Can we please have a rebuttal? Or better still, a removal of the Quick Vote so that dissenting opinions can be presented without being suppressed?
Most of their videos on UA-cam seem to be about flowers or scones so I don't think your assessment reflects the facts. And if you think equality is obnoxious, why would you care if people's views are represented or not?
@@Worldtree-dw5dtyou’re doing gods work replying to these trolls :)
@@Worldtree-dw5dtDiversity, Equity and Inclusion has nothing to do with Equality. We are living in an age of enlightened Sophists believing that they're civilising and rebuilding Rome. The "National Trust" should be renamed to the "Post-National Trust"
@@Mojo1701 How do you know they're trolls and not concerned citizens? How do you know there's a god to do 'work' for?
I would say that the damage that the National Trust has done to itself is reflected in the fact it has a mere under 25k subscribers on a channel that should have hundreds of thousands as one of the UK's premier charities.
Why pay for national trust when you can go and enjoy nature for free. It's a captured BS organisation