260RIPS compares the new Pulsar Digex C50 and Infiray Tube TD50L Night Vision

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 25 жов 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 18

  • @StezzSquad
    @StezzSquad Рік тому +4

    We wanted one of this to see the critters in our backyard. ua-cam.com/users/postUgkxGix1RueFf66g4dKZ0w4Qsw_3Vv6Xqant The first thing that I like about this is that it has a rechargeable battery. The other is that it is small and fairly easy to use. The instructions weren't too great but we played with it awhile and figured it out. Can see very well in our back yard down to the woods which is roughly a football field length in the dark. There were certainly more expensive ones out there but this works for us and was within our price range. We have not tried the video recording portion and may update the review later.

  • @kenh6096
    @kenh6096 2 роки тому +3

    Thanks for the comparison. The TD50L looks like it has slight juddering in the video compared to the C50. A bit like it's running at a lower refresh rate. Is that seen in real life or it a UA-cam compression artifacts?

  • @iandebie
    @iandebie 2 роки тому +2

    I thought the Td50L was 4-16 x mag not 32?

  • @davidstent1
    @davidstent1 2 роки тому +1

    Which torch would you recommend for the TD50L Mark. Thanks.

  • @raymondoreilly7569
    @raymondoreilly7569 Рік тому

    Hi there I just bought the Infiray TD50L, How do you get the rectilcal up on the screen?
    Regards Raymond

  • @keesdane9687
    @keesdane9687 Рік тому

    What you think for rat 🐀 shooting with scope you prefer Mark
    Thanks for your time

  • @lachlanclifford8697
    @lachlanclifford8697 10 місяців тому

    How far away was the fallow buck in the pulsar footage?

  • @nigelbase1196
    @nigelbase1196 2 роки тому

    Drone pro still king of the hill 😉

  • @jamesholton2102
    @jamesholton2102 2 роки тому

    How do they compare for a wraith for example?

    • @TheNightVisionShow
      @TheNightVisionShow  2 роки тому +1

      DIgex C50 more sensitive in low light, and offers more realistic day time image, but it is twice the price.

  • @TwighlightLodge
    @TwighlightLodge Рік тому

    I'm surprised that the Chinese made knock-off is only 200 quid less than the Pulsar.

  • @Fox_hunter161
    @Fox_hunter161 Рік тому

    Termion & Tube th

  • @MKChase-uj9vx
    @MKChase-uj9vx 2 роки тому +1

    I have a TL35... the image is great... but the software is absolutely SHITE... you need a degree in computer science to zero it and the manual is shockingly translated..
    Honestly, I have a mate that bought one then sold it two months later for a grand less because he was that fed up with its complexity.
    Would I buy another unless they sort out the awful software... NO WAY!