Fatigue crack growth

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 31 січ 2025

КОМЕНТАРІ • 16

  • @usernumbereighteen
    @usernumbereighteen 3 роки тому +3

    Thank you. This helped clear up 4 hours of me getting nowhere

  • @captainvlog
    @captainvlog 2 роки тому

    thank you. It's great these videos are short and to the point.

  • @lucasgrego123
    @lucasgrego123 3 роки тому +1

    Thank you for explaining this topic so clearly!

  • @janleutner11
    @janleutner11 2 роки тому +1

    Great comprehensive video, thanks!

  • @ramdhiwakarseetharaman5989
    @ramdhiwakarseetharaman5989 2 роки тому +1

    Thank you so much Taylor. Can you please give the source link for Table 6.3 at the end of the video ?

  • @Andme20
    @Andme20 3 роки тому +1

    Awesome video, thanks!

  • @christhompson7371
    @christhompson7371 2 роки тому

    Hi Taylor. Please could you provide a full reference for the Barsom ‘n’ and ‘A’ tabulated values (7 min 24s). Thanks.

  • @skyecooleyartwork
    @skyecooleyartwork 3 роки тому

    Why is the linear portion (Region II ?) important? Why do we only consider Region II and ignore the non-linear portions of the log-log curve above and below?

    • @TaylorSparks
      @TaylorSparks  3 роки тому

      You are absolutely right that all three regions are important. Before we could do advanced modelling, the steady state middle region was simply the easiest to model since it was linear.

  • @captainvlog
    @captainvlog 2 роки тому

    Do we have to make an adjustment for the net section as the crack starts to become larger in determining the critical crack length?

    • @TaylorSparks
      @TaylorSparks  2 роки тому

      Yes. Paris law only works for the steady state region not the initial or the final regions

  • @HopeScreen
    @HopeScreen 2 роки тому

    rate of crake propagation increases with increase in mean stress or not?

  • @hadjerdellil858
    @hadjerdellil858 9 місяців тому

    Sir, may i request your slide please if it is possible . Thanks