0:23 - Other way around mate. Hawk-Eye in cricket shows what would have happened if the batter was not standing in front of the stumps. Hawk-Eye in tennis shows where the ball just landed.
Forever purple n gold. Just wonderful, I've been looking for "tennis betting forums" for a while now, and I think this has helped. You ever tried - Aiyenjamin Prefatory Approach - (search on google ) ? It is an awesome one of a kind product for discovering how to get a unique tennis betting formula minus the hard work. Ive heard some super things about it and my friend got great results with it.
Correction: Hawkeye doesn't predict where the ball is going to land. It's just shows where the ball actually landed. Hawkeye based prediction is used to in Cricket for LBW decisions where it predicts where the ball would have eventually ended up had it not hit the batsman.
@@Brody_518 no. It doesn't predict in tennis. It tracks and tell you where it actually landed. In cricket it predicts the trajectory to see if the ball would have hit the stumps if the player didn't block it with his legs.
Detecting... Detecting... That is a lie. Its well know that Hawkins was a fan of cricket and originally developed it for that use. It was the first sport to make use of the technology and was never designed for football until recent years for its use in VAR
Is that true in tennis? In MLB it captures the spin rate of a baseball from a pitcher and even the axis of the spin and how this axis changes as the pitch goes from the hand to home plate
Sincere Question - WHY ALL THE COMPLICATGED TRIANGULATION and calculations, to see what is GOING TO happen. Why not equip the court with 4 high res, high frame rate camera, looking straight down the court and recording - and replaying the ball in slow mo when needed??! I mean we have those cameras now, you can literally see bullets in slow mo.... Would be 100% accurate, and cause less controversy. I saw one tennis match, when in replay of actual video you could see balls were way out, but hawk-eye kept saying those balls were in. I guess it was not calibrated correctly that day.....
Yow Bunny that’s so much more effort. This system just has calculations happening, no need for huge, expensive cameras that need way too much space for the storage of videos
0:23 - Other way around mate. Hawk-Eye in cricket shows what would have happened if the batter was not standing in front of the stumps. Hawk-Eye in tennis shows where the ball just landed.
Wrong. Hawk-Eye in tennis predicts where the ball lands/has landed based on lots of factors.
5 mm in tennis is a lot
Forever purple n gold. Just wonderful, I've been looking for "tennis betting forums" for a while now, and I think this has helped. You ever tried - Aiyenjamin Prefatory Approach - (search on google ) ? It is an awesome one of a kind product for discovering how to get a unique tennis betting formula minus the hard work. Ive heard some super things about it and my friend got great results with it.
No it's not
No it isn't, sigh.
thats like 1/5 of an inch
terrific video CBC Sports. I shattered the thumbs up on your video. Keep up the high quality work.
Why does it predict when the point is to asses what happened? How is the accuracy measured?
Correction: Hawkeye doesn't predict where the ball is going to land. It's just shows where the ball actually landed. Hawkeye based prediction is used to in Cricket for LBW decisions where it predicts where the ball would have eventually ended up had it not hit the batsman.
No he’s right it predicts where it will land
@@Brody_518 no. It doesn't predict in tennis. It tracks and tell you where it actually landed.
In cricket it predicts the trajectory to see if the ball would have hit the stumps if the player didn't block it with his legs.
@@bulthaosen1169 yes it does. Hawk-Eye predicts in tennis.
Whyre they using windows 95 on that computer
Maybe because it's a lot faster because it doesn't have much details
Because if it works fine then what's the point in upgrading to something that might not be compatible
Never change a running system
@@hatakecopyninja how's your steam train?
If the ball is closer than 5mm to the line do they rule against the challenge?
5mm error margin and 10 seconds time to generate imagery doesn't sound great to me. Are you using 90's computers
very cool thanks for the explanation
Hawkeye was first in football actually I know because it was my dad who invented it
Any link or something to support the statement, as I remember it was originally called Scope and was 1st used in ashes.
Detecting... Detecting... That is a lie. Its well know that Hawkins was a fan of cricket and originally developed it for that use. It was the first sport to make use of the technology and was never designed for football until recent years for its use in VAR
I dont' believe because my dad invented football and he doesn't like hawks or eyes.
I believe Hawk eye biggest flaw is there is no way for it to calculate spin rate
Is that true in tennis? In MLB it captures the spin rate of a baseball from a pitcher and even the axis of the spin and how this axis changes as the pitch goes from the hand to home plate
No. It can calculate spin rates. Maybe it's just not used in tennis to do so. It's done in cricket.
Sincere Question - WHY ALL THE COMPLICATGED TRIANGULATION and calculations, to see what is GOING TO happen. Why not equip the court with 4 high res, high frame rate camera, looking straight down the court and recording - and replaying the ball in slow mo when needed??! I mean we have those cameras now, you can literally see bullets in slow mo.... Would be 100% accurate, and cause less controversy. I saw one tennis match, when in replay of actual video you could see balls were way out, but hawk-eye kept saying those balls were in. I guess it was not calibrated correctly that day.....
Yow Bunny that’s so much more effort. This system just has calculations happening, no need for huge, expensive cameras that need way too much space for the storage of videos
@@Murko27 you can record each rally individually and delete the footage after if nothing is contested
I think 8+ cameras to the Hawk-Eye so much expensive...
I have sure they could figure something better nowdays
@@basketofbuckets the footage would not be clear and all the other limitations that high definition super high speed cameras possess would also apply
It's now accurate to 1mm
incorrect
Cool tech.
The only flaw it runs on windows
Hawk eye is wrong. Bruh the confidence
It's looks an expensive system. $$