@@Bomtombadi1 Misinformation is a major weapon with evolutionists, just look at the trans fossils of hominids, all of them are manufactured to make us believe they are humanoid. Haeckels embryo chart was a lie and ernst heackel admitted to it and lost his tenure but his chart is still used today.
You forgot about joule heating. Look up videos on Martian dust devils, and pay attention to the base of them. You might notice how bright they are. Both Jupiter and Saturn’s moons are in a known electrical current with the planets, but everybody ignores it
@25:59 "our solar system does look young" Because it is. Genesis tells us the Earth was created 6,000 years ago, not only our solar system testifies to a young age but everything does.
@@travisbicklepopsicle "i haven't read" It starts with the daily creation then continues with the birth to birth timeline, that is if we take Adams creation on day 6 and add 130 years when his son seth was born we have the first 130 years of the timeline, then add the age of seth when his first child was born ect ect. This works till we get to Jesus Christ then add 2,000 years since Christ and we get nearly 6,000 years.
@@travisbicklepopsicle "there are cities" I think you'll find they were radiometrically dated, this method of dating is fallible, we know it has failed dismally, there are many other examples where radiometric dating has been shown to fail eg a snail shell dated to 8,000 years but the snail was still alive, samples taken from mt st helens showed the eruption took place between 350,000 and 2 million years ago but we saw the eruption occur in 1980 note: the mt st helens samples were tested by every method not just c12.
Personally, I think it would be interesting to create another artificial biosphere and improve on the mistakes. At the very least, we could gain a better understanding of the intricate checks and balances incorporated into Earth's environment and the creation.
A colony on mars requires a habitat that they would have to stay inside of, they would need a life support suit to go outside so if we colonised mars, they would die.
Researchers don't understand the internal heating of the Earth much better than the internal heating of other celestial bodies. They're still trying to figure it out.
When the moon orbits the Earth it pulls the tides along with it, which can be used to extract energy. And likewise if these "tidal forces" are constantly producing heat and energy input and output must always be equal where is all the energy coming from? If you tried to do something similar with a magnet spinning around constantly pulling on other magnets then surely the spinning magnet would slow down. Is the moon also slowing down??!?
The biosphere was set to fail before it even started. 1. The people who spent time in the biosphere here on Earth were not the same type of people you'd expect to see in a biosphere on Mars. I doubt seriously the command structure for the biosphere here on Earth was anything like the command structure you would have on Mars. Can you imagine telling a bunch of scientists and idealogs, who are probably ideologically against the military, that for the next two years they're going to be subject to the same type of command structure as you would find in the military... That wouldn't go over too well at all. 2. The mentality of do-or-die (DOD) wasn't there like it would be in a location such as Mars. Obviously we don't want to see people needlessly die for an experiment, but the reality of DOD on Mars, well.... The expression "necessity is the mother of invention" has a completely different mentality attached to it when you are not safely here on Earth where the DOD will never be possible. 3. People on Mars would have hundreds if not thousands of people on hand supporting them 24/7. The biosphere on Earth did not even come close to having that type of support. Of the 3 points I listed I would say #2 was the biggest contributor at the biospheres here on Earth failing.
A similar situation exists for the space station in Earth orbit. It has scientists, but also seems to have a good command structure keeping things safe and organized.
Well, the deep sea offers significantly fewer advantages for habitation, and due to the immense pressure and lack of sunlight, it could be just as challenging, if not more so, to live on than Mars.
It is shocking that the moon quake detected by Chandrayan 3 mission has not been considered in this discussion. It is highly unlikely that it is not known, so is it that the data is not trusted?
@SaintFluffySnow okay that makes sense. well I just thought that we are recording it with the latest equipment and may find it thrilling. Are there other equipment out there that still give us data?
8:29 "that look like they're warm" like our Earth? Genesis states Earth was created first 6,000 years ago, therefore every other celestial body is younger than Earth by a few days.
Hate to burst your bubble, but the moon has no light of its own, hence "a lesser light." It refects light from the sun, even though it has rather low albedo. That it has no light of its own is proven by its phases. Four manned missions have landed on the moon and several other unmanned missions by several nations.
I’m so grateful that you folks are making trustworthy information available to lay people like myself. Thank you.
When a “scientist” calls astronomers “evolutionists”, this instantly makes whatever they have to say untrustworthy
If they are Evolutions, whatever they have to say is untrustworthy.
*Evolutionists
@@maureenoconnell2413 what are those n the context of this discussion in mars?
@@Bomtombadi1
Misinformation is a major weapon with evolutionists, just look at the trans fossils of hominids, all of them are manufactured to make us believe they are humanoid. Haeckels embryo chart was a lie and ernst heackel admitted to it and lost his tenure but his chart is still used today.
I like the way Dr Hebert explains the science for the layman. Good interaction in this interview!
I wish to thank you for sharing this informational Podcast video with me . Amen
You forgot about joule heating. Look up videos on Martian dust devils, and pay attention to the base of them. You might notice how bright they are.
Both Jupiter and Saturn’s moons are in a known electrical current with the planets, but everybody ignores it
Thank you Sir / Madam for your wonderfull Godly explanation.
@25:59 "our solar system does look young"
Because it is. Genesis tells us the Earth was created 6,000 years ago, not only our solar system testifies to a young age but everything does.
@@travisbicklepopsicle
"i haven't read"
It starts with the daily creation then continues with the birth to birth timeline, that is if we take Adams creation on day 6 and add 130 years when his son seth was born we have the first 130 years of the timeline, then add the age of seth when his first child was born ect ect. This works till we get to Jesus Christ then add 2,000 years since Christ and we get nearly 6,000 years.
@@travisbicklepopsicle
"there are cities"
I think you'll find they were radiometrically dated, this method of dating is fallible, we know it has failed dismally, there are many other examples where radiometric dating has been shown to fail eg a snail shell dated to 8,000 years but the snail was still alive, samples taken from mt st helens showed the eruption took place between 350,000 and 2 million years ago but we saw the eruption occur in 1980 note: the mt st helens samples were tested by every method not just c12.
The plants in the biosphere weren't making enough oxygen for the people. I believe also that there was a roach infestation.
Personally, I think it would be interesting to create another artificial biosphere and improve on the mistakes.
At the very least, we could gain a better understanding of the intricate checks and balances incorporated into Earth's environment and the creation.
A colony on mars requires a habitat that they would have to stay inside of, they would need a life support suit to go outside so if we colonised mars, they would die.
Gravitational flexing is like bending a metal rod back and forth and it gets hot.
Nice job ICR. Very informative!
Why did the moon ring like a bell for hours after a large piece of equipment was dropped on it?
Says who? Ludwig Holberg?
Why are the moons craters all the same depth no matter its diameter in size? And why are the floor of the moons craters flat rather than rounded?
@@travisbicklepopsicle😊
How is it that there is no reporting on how the earth 🌎 is cooling due to age like the rest of the universe???????
Researchers don't understand the internal heating of the Earth much better than the internal heating of other celestial bodies. They're still trying to figure it out.
When the moon orbits the Earth it pulls the tides along with it, which can be used to extract energy. And likewise if these "tidal forces" are constantly producing heat and energy input and output must always be equal where is all the energy coming from? If you tried to do something similar with a magnet spinning around constantly pulling on other magnets then surely the spinning magnet would slow down. Is the moon also slowing down??!?
Every time things do not line up….. a rouge planet out of nowhere seems to be their favorite save…..
The more craters a planet has the Younger it is.
The biosphere was set to fail before it even started.
1. The people who spent time in the biosphere here on Earth were not the same type of people you'd expect to see in a biosphere on Mars.
I doubt seriously the command structure for the biosphere here on Earth was anything like the command structure you would have on Mars.
Can you imagine telling a bunch of scientists and idealogs, who are probably ideologically against the military, that for the next two years they're going to be subject to the same type of command structure as you would find in the military... That wouldn't go over too well at all.
2. The mentality of do-or-die (DOD) wasn't there like it would be in a location such as Mars. Obviously we don't want to see people needlessly die for an experiment, but the reality of DOD on Mars, well.... The expression "necessity is the mother of invention" has a completely different mentality attached to it when you are not safely here on Earth where the DOD will never be possible.
3. People on Mars would have hundreds if not thousands of people on hand supporting them 24/7. The biosphere on Earth did not even come close to having that type of support.
Of the 3 points I listed I would say #2 was the biggest contributor at the biospheres here on Earth failing.
A similar situation exists for the space station in Earth orbit. It has scientists, but also seems to have a good command structure keeping things safe and organized.
Perhaps Mars had a thick atmosphere when its moons were captured.
I doubt if they could be successful in setting up a permanent living environment on any other planet as well.
We haven't even inhabited the deep seas which are just kilometers deep, now mars? Can't you think of a better truthful content?
Well, the deep sea offers significantly fewer advantages for habitation, and due to the immense pressure and lack of sunlight, it could be just as challenging, if not more so, to live on than Mars.
Can we live on mars? Likely no, but time will tell.
The recent finding suggests that Mars is geologically active with occurrences in the millions of years. wiki.
Answer: NO
No
It is shocking that the moon quake detected by Chandrayan 3 mission has not been considered in this discussion. It is highly unlikely that it is not known, so is it that the data is not trusted?
@SaintFluffySnow okay that makes sense. well I just thought that we are recording it with the latest equipment and may find it thrilling. Are there other equipment out there that still give us data?
Nope, just like we never landed on the moon
8:29 "that look like they're warm" like our Earth? Genesis states Earth was created first 6,000 years ago, therefore every other celestial body is younger than Earth by a few days.
Moon is a light sourse, it is not a rock in space. We have never landed on the moon.
Hate to burst your bubble, but the moon has no light of its own, hence "a lesser light." It refects light from the sun, even though it has rather low albedo. That it has no light of its own is proven by its phases. Four manned missions have landed on the moon and several other unmanned missions by several nations.