Russia's very own "Panama Canal" in Iran

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 21 вер 2024
  • Join us as we delve into one of the most ambitious infrastructure projects of our time. Explore the geopolitical significance, environmental considerations, and the potential impact on global trade as we uncover Russia's plan to construct a canal connecting the Caspian Sea to the Persian Gulf through Iran. Stay tuned for an insightful exploration of this monumental endeavor! 🌊🛠️ #CanalProject #Geopolitics #Infrastructure
    Watch the full video to learn more about this groundbreaking initiative!

КОМЕНТАРІ • 33

  • @armandoneri3607
    @armandoneri3607 Рік тому +11

    They don't need a canal, they already have a rail and road route which is much safer.

    • @TheMystixCube
      @TheMystixCube 10 місяців тому +7

      the canal would be much cheaper for shipping, while also being marketable

    • @iranazadi7
      @iranazadi7 5 місяців тому +2

      I was originally against this idea but I like it now due to the fact that iran needs this water for desalination. One plan says they want to desalijnate water and fill it, which is silly. It will cost over 10 billion obviously to dig it, however, there are some rivers that can be widened and used. The fresh water can temporarily be held back to fill the canal. This river is also connected to another one which is dammed. A large river through iran would solve a lot of problems.

    • @MahdiyarAbdollahi
      @MahdiyarAbdollahi 2 місяці тому

      ​@@iranazadi7I think making big, modern cities would solve the problem for less money. The disastrous location of mega cities like Tehran and Qom is the problem not Iran's lack of water

    • @iranazadi7
      @iranazadi7 2 місяці тому

      @@MahdiyarAbdollahi you have no idea what you'e talking about. There are two large lakes above tehran. Those cities dono't have a water problem.

  • @roberturbanczyk204
    @roberturbanczyk204 Місяць тому +3

    How would water evaporate if it will fullfill caspian sea? Water from persian gulf would cause more rains and maybe even fullfill aral sea. Caspian sea is drying. Water evaporated in caspian sea might cause bigger rainfalls in central Asia and lower the level of the oceans. Central Asia needs this water source.

    • @simonemezzacapo6544
      @simonemezzacapo6544 Місяць тому

      The video is very generic and has many errors. If the cost is 10 billions and china likes it, it will be made part of belt and road. Als evaporation could make more benefits than damages greening those areas. But the Caspian sea getting filled is not a problem

  • @DanielSilva-jj2lz
    @DanielSilva-jj2lz 3 місяці тому +3

    Evaporation would never be a problem as it would just let the sea water flow. To say that nowadays someone doesn't have the technical knowledge to drill a hole in a mountain is incredibly stupid, to say that Russia can't get 10 billion dollars is another colossal stupidity. The only thing that prevents this channel from existing is that Russia does not feel confident about the political variations that may exist over time. For example, Russia is torn between investing and not investing in new gas projects in Germany, but the economic group managed to make the investment, now that the Western government has kidnapped all investments. the conservative side killed everyone involved in business with europe. Russia doesn't build this, because Russia doesn't believe in contracts, something that was broken once will be broken again.

  • @Xander27-k3d
    @Xander27-k3d 4 місяці тому +1

    Man I congratulate you for your work on this youtube channel. Your shorts seem to have worked for views

  • @HeavenlyDeathKing
    @HeavenlyDeathKing 11 місяців тому +3

    Man this is much better than the last video. Hope tge next video gets better.

  • @TVOrientalTelesofiabartolomeu
    @TVOrientalTelesofiabartolomeu Місяць тому

    Único canal que trabalhou esse tema.
    🇧🇷🇧🇷🇧🇷

  • @robertfoster7807
    @robertfoster7807 Місяць тому

    These is already a canal between black and Caspian sea built by the ussr but its only small

  • @EpicanoCzechThessaGaming
    @EpicanoCzechThessaGaming 10 місяців тому +1

    man you are so close to 100k you on 99.9k

  • @daveweiss5647
    @daveweiss5647 5 місяців тому

    Well... it would need locks regardless due to the mountains... also due to mountains if the locks are destroyed the Caspian would not be flooded... but you're correct, it will never happen,it would be too big a project...$10 isn't even 1/20th the cost...

  • @pohmoh3590
    @pohmoh3590 2 місяці тому

    Can have control flow of water into canal to take care of water loss through evaporation.

  • @lanonymequicroitenlascience
    @lanonymequicroitenlascience Місяць тому +1

    WTF are you even talking about, a river needs altitude to produce flow, a canal can not be built with water just sitting there (or otherwise it evaporates...)
    Actually every problem you mentioned in your analysis cancel out each other besides the one on Iran's ressources. As the crow flies, an iranian canal would be about 800 km in length. Let's take an example, the Danube river drops 50m in altitude within the last 800 km of its route. A 30 m difference for the canal would barely allow for a flow to compensate evaporation, without flooding the Caspian sea. Therefore even an earthquake would not cause a flooding since the natural slope would limit the flow.
    The only real problem is to be able to dig a continnuous slope through Iran, which means huge canal tunnels for freiht ships or massive canyons. Take a look at "The Line", multiply it by 1000.
    The lowest path would still go through 1000 m high mountain passes, which means digging a 1km deep canyon over tenths of kilometers ?!!

  • @RusselTanTing-kf8zm
    @RusselTanTing-kf8zm 6 місяців тому

    One mistake you made is that the point of a Russian trade route through Iran is to ensure shorter and cheaper route for Russia oil exports to India, not to venture out into the Atlantic because Russia’s Arctic vessels can already reach out into the open Atlantic.

  • @porus6312
    @porus6312 Місяць тому

    They should build a modern rail line that will be a simple and inexpensive solution

  • @RotaryMC24_Hello
    @RotaryMC24_Hello 3 місяці тому

    If both canals in the video were built
    Then Kuzehkstan (did I spell it correctly) would benefit not going through the strait of Hormuz

  • @peterwong4779
    @peterwong4779 Місяць тому +1

    👍👍👍

  • @danieloehler2494
    @danieloehler2494 Місяць тому

    First: calling Turkey an allie of the West is courageous. Turkey regards itself as the leader of the Sunni muslim world. For the Turks the supporters of Israel in the West are enemies.
    Second: Russia has access to the Sea in the far North.
    Third: Russia, Iran and India have united to build a corridor using rail transport where necessary.
    Forth: Russia's main partner is China. To connect they use rail and pipelines.

  • @marlotree6909
    @marlotree6909 7 місяців тому +1

    BRICS+ waytogo.... wtch this space!

  • @chw5044
    @chw5044 Місяць тому +1

    Russia is a marvel ❤❤❤

  • @malarconxx7341
    @malarconxx7341 Місяць тому

    Build trains and oleoducts

  • @maxbnz
    @maxbnz 3 місяці тому

    This will happen and alreay started long time ago!!!

  • @arnolddavis-cu7nh
    @arnolddavis-cu7nh 4 місяці тому +2

    Russia has no money

    • @omidr4084
      @omidr4084 3 місяці тому

      at least they know what the mercy is but Muslims and islamic republic regime even do not know waht is that entirely

  • @Superator69
    @Superator69 Місяць тому +2

    What are you smoking?😂

  • @sandersdev
    @sandersdev 16 днів тому

    Iranians are not stupid to let Russians on their land, whatever the excuse may be.

  • @robertstanley3799
    @robertstanley3799 Місяць тому

    How are they landlocked there right next to water