Deriving the Short-Run Supply Curve

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 5 жов 2024
  • This video shows how to calculate the short-run relationship between price and quantity supplied for an individual firm or from a market of firms.
    For more information and a complete listing of videos and online articles by topic or textbook chapter, see www.economistsd...
    For t-shirts and other EDIWM items, see www.economistsd...
    By Jodi Beggs - Economists Do It With Models
    www.economistsd...
    Facebook: / economistsdoitwithmodels
    Twitter: / jodiecongirl
    Tumblr: / economistsdoitwithmodels

КОМЕНТАРІ • 75

  • @Hoppensagen
    @Hoppensagen 7 років тому +56

    You know sometimes I wonder if we even need college anymore, like we could just buy the books and watch youtube videos on things we don't understand.

    • @autumnsadventures
      @autumnsadventures 6 років тому

      We actually wouldn't do it though hahaha

    • @louaishalabi770
      @louaishalabi770 6 років тому +2

      i never use any of my books. i understand what youre saying because its like i learn 20% at school and 80% at home off youtube videos.

    • @SmartWentCrazy.
      @SmartWentCrazy. 5 років тому

      @@louaishalabi770 Some great entrepreneur is going to shake things up big time in the next ten years

    • @manganizulu1565
      @manganizulu1565 5 років тому

      @@louaishalabi770I can't more agree less I bet we should just open youtube online school...lol

    • @DutchOrbit
      @DutchOrbit 4 роки тому

      you described khan academy

  • @neelsavla6373
    @neelsavla6373 3 роки тому

    I was stuck with this and no one explained it in this way! May God bless you!

  • @KiKyO1987
    @KiKyO1987 9 років тому +1

    thanks for these videos! i'm currently doing my MBA and currently studying the economics module and struggling a bit .. so cheers with these videos! very educational!

  • @jubin3783
    @jubin3783 4 роки тому

    Thanks mam
    U cleared the concept in minutes
    U r one of the best economics teacher in this platform

  • @maherator
    @maherator 11 років тому

    You killed it! better than my professor! I hope you have videos for other markets , monopoly, oligopoly..etc

  • @FroggyStonks
    @FroggyStonks 11 років тому +1

    I absolutely love your curves ;) Thanks this helped me through my homework and I had no problem paying attention either!

  • @marthenrobinsonpellokila7445
    @marthenrobinsonpellokila7445 6 років тому

    Thank you jodiecongirl it's really helpful for my student in microeconomics

  • @jadedconformist
    @jadedconformist 11 років тому

    Thanks for showing us the light with all your vids.

  • @jodiecongirl
    @jodiecongirl  12 років тому +2

    @BradyDale I always had a light! What I didn't have was a decent camera with manual exposure adjustment. :)

  • @paragverma6381
    @paragverma6381 7 років тому +1

    U r brilliant. P.s = your way of telling you'll do better next time is just awesome. Keep up the good work. :)

  • @kusubos
    @kusubos 12 років тому

    super clear explained. cant imagine how to do it better. thanks.

  • @mdmamun-vr1xf
    @mdmamun-vr1xf 9 років тому

    You should tutor this stuff if you don't already. Very informative, super helpful for my finals!

    • @samanshp
      @samanshp 7 років тому

      She is teaching econ, but her actual job is selling whiteboards and markers. :|

  • @TheZachary86
    @TheZachary86 11 років тому +1

    Hi Jodie, love the explanation. But there is something that has been bugging me about the derivation of the supply curve. Why would a firm at minimum produce above the AVC? Shouldn't it produce at minimum above the ATC? i don't see how any sensible firm would only think of their variable cost.

  • @caseyalanjones
    @caseyalanjones 4 роки тому

    Thanks, this helped me really get the concept!
    It led me into some other confusion though. At first I thought you were doing the piecewise part of the function wrong, since it violates the vertical line test, but I realized that it's correct, since quantity produced is a function of price and not vice-versa - so at any given price below p_1*, the quantity produced will be 0. That makes sense, but it made me think that maybe the canonical choice of axes for these variables should have been reversed, since price is the independent variable here, and quantity the dependent one.
    However, if that were done, then the cost curves such as AVC would violate the vertical line test. But I suppose that for AVC et al, the roles are reversed - price depends on quantity produced; in other words, price is the dependent variable and quantity is the independent variable.
    Maybe I am overthinking this. 😕

  • @RoKdIz
    @RoKdIz 11 років тому

    @Zac Lim: think about the fact that between ATC and AVC is AFC. Thus, operating with the price between those two curves will cover some of the fixed cost which is better than shutting down (if you shut down you will suffer the whole fixed cost). Make sense?

  • @homeyrapirmomen8344
    @homeyrapirmomen8344 2 роки тому

    Thank you for the video, I've been struggling to understand !! :D

  • @oatstralia
    @oatstralia 11 років тому

    Very informative, super helpful for my finals! You should tutor this stuff, if you don't already :D

  • @Prinxali
    @Prinxali 11 років тому

    Thanks! Made it very simple to understand.

  • @AsgharKhan-fd1ul
    @AsgharKhan-fd1ul 12 років тому

    i request you show it graphically how to derive market supply curve when firms face different cost curves, thanks. I face such problem in the book i have. so please, do this favor

  • @hnt7961
    @hnt7961 4 роки тому

    Hi teacher. Is this only applied to a competitive firm, not a monopoly? thank you so much.

  • @ultimage7
    @ultimage7 12 років тому

    As long as it gets me motivated to move on to the next lesson, sure.

  • @johnfritz2310
    @johnfritz2310 7 років тому

    What are the assumptions used in deriving the supply curve

  • @BradyDale
    @BradyDale 12 років тому

    @jodiecongirl Ooooh... well, the videos are looking better, so either way!

  • @jesuslovestoastyaya
    @jesuslovestoastyaya 9 років тому

    great help, thanks

  • @zafar111
    @zafar111 12 років тому

    Thank you so much.

  • @felixnanawiafeakenten7326
    @felixnanawiafeakenten7326 4 роки тому

    you are a genius

  • @johncharles3907
    @johncharles3907 10 років тому +1

    Why does Marginal cost equal supply? I don't understand. Thanks for any reply! :)

    • @edwinbuddy
      @edwinbuddy 10 років тому +5

      P=AR=MR for competitive firms.
      Firm will maximize profit at MR =MC

    • @betofx7
      @betofx7 7 років тому

      Although the video is great, what you said is all I needed to understand. Thank you!!!!

    • @GodIsEverPowerful
      @GodIsEverPowerful 5 років тому

      @@edwinbuddy nice

  • @BradyDale
    @BradyDale 12 років тому

    You bought a light! You bought a light! Way to go!

  • @Lizelena10x
    @Lizelena10x 9 років тому

    thankyou helped a lot !!!

  • @adilbeksultanov8853
    @adilbeksultanov8853 9 років тому

    Thank you!

  • @adarsh601
    @adarsh601 3 роки тому

    This is only true for a perfectly competitive market right?

  • @LeandroLimaeSilva
    @LeandroLimaeSilva 9 років тому

    Excelent. Thanks!

  • @panashtakawira4674
    @panashtakawira4674 7 років тому +1

    great!!

  • @janklimicek2494
    @janklimicek2494 10 років тому

    Thank a lot for your help! :)

  • @tatendajojo9285
    @tatendajojo9285 7 років тому

    guys is this a perfect competition market

    • @mellisagrandison6463
      @mellisagrandison6463 7 років тому

      the concepts of the supply curve being a part of the MC applies to both perfect and imperfect firms

  • @GodIsEverPowerful
    @GodIsEverPowerful 5 років тому

    super!

  • @sunnykfd
    @sunnykfd 12 років тому

    i was studying for my exam and i chose to watch your video so i can learn some new stuff. But i could not concentrate cause it was so hard to focus because your accent and smartness distracted me the whole time.

  • @microeconomiks
    @microeconomiks 11 років тому

    Notice how the MC has a negative slope.

  • @lahirulowe4752
    @lahirulowe4752 3 роки тому

    watching this 10 years later in 2021

  • @olivezoo
    @olivezoo 2 роки тому

    nice

  • @jaehee7196
    @jaehee7196 3 роки тому

    Me reading over the text 5 times for 30minutes and still being confused with this two graphs
    Me watching this video: 10 minutes later... ohhhhh this is what that gibberish was about

  • @andrewtabbert8062
    @andrewtabbert8062 11 місяців тому

    As helpful with visuals as this is, if you are going to state you are serving something you should probably show the math behind it

  • @georgekutubidze3316
    @georgekutubidze3316 6 років тому

    the best

  • @kimarawynter4900
    @kimarawynter4900 9 років тому +1

    kinda too slow and i lose focus take tips from ACDC

  • @aritrachatterjee3353
    @aritrachatterjee3353 3 роки тому

    9 yrs old this video...what is the oldest video on youtube?

  • @supunliyon8940
    @supunliyon8940 10 років тому +9

    Too distracting :/

  • @rajeshsavji4663
    @rajeshsavji4663 3 роки тому

    Advnatge Asia Subject facilites naw India nation facilites law Subject naw current facilites advnatge take care issue Subject salution Index take care issue Subject as per educatioan.

  • @lalitkushwaha3303
    @lalitkushwaha3303 6 років тому

    the teacher Is hot 🔥

  • @grantedwards8546
    @grantedwards8546 9 років тому +9

    This is why I cannot stand microeconomics. The entire course consists of drawing graphs. Would calculus applications not make economic theory more useful? I'm sorry but I feel like this is why economics departments attract all of the lazy students...because professors are hesitant to use advanced math.

    • @julia5229
      @julia5229 8 років тому +13

      +Grant Edwards Economics does use calculus, more so in advanced classes. And, just because you maybe don't understand the material, you shouldn't insult those who choose to take it or choose to major in it. Economics is not meant for anyone who is "lazy." It requires a lot of hard work and effort, and as you delve farther into economics, the harder it becomes.
      Sincerely,
      A biology and economics major.

    • @grantedwards8546
      @grantedwards8546 8 років тому +3

      Julia Jean Thanks for your input. It just seems that economics professors shy away from using advanced math because business majors are usually not as strong in mathematics when compared to students in other departments, unless top-tier economics programs are taken into consideration. All of the material in this video could have easily been expressed in formal mathematics notation instead of the primary use of graphs.
      Sincerely,
      BA Economics, BS Mathematics, MA Financial Engineering

    • @mostinho7
      @mostinho7 7 років тому +1

      Grant has a point. I'm in engineering and taking Econ and I can see what he's saying. Sometimes though, it's better to express things in this "nice" way instead of formal math.

  • @XzxXadrianXxzX
    @XzxXadrianXxzX 8 років тому

    Hey so just an idea here; I think it would be great to get actual bikini models to give the lesson! I can see myself being much more attentive.

  • @beerndumplings
    @beerndumplings 12 років тому +2

    along with showing more emotion, why doesn't she just fix your a drink while she teaches you economics?

  • @Wthisthishandler
    @Wthisthishandler 11 років тому

    hahaha just move out of the way next time please ...good work thanx a lot i owe you big

  • @GeomaticsEngineer
    @GeomaticsEngineer 7 років тому

    Not sure I can drink the micro economics koolaid any more. If one firm has a upward sloping MC curve and you derive its supply curve from the Marginal curve. And is if you take two firms and combine them to show that they can both produce that same marginal cost curve, but have double the output. Then you just proved that one firm that buys two firms can then have half the marginal cost curve. Which then implies that all this is bull shit. LOL.

  • @xmassan20906
    @xmassan20906 11 років тому

    Any one else just click on this to see her face the board? Economics doesn't seem so bad now.

  • @ultimage7
    @ultimage7 12 років тому

    You're so adorable! You shouldn't act so stiff and professional. Joke around, show more emotion and your lessons would be perfect!

  • @pedrotodaro1808
    @pedrotodaro1808 9 років тому

    Marry me!

  • @jordantaylor9542
    @jordantaylor9542 9 років тому +1

    Maybe get rid of the overtly crass and gross intro branding/watermark.. Are these videos aimed at 15y/o boys?

    • @dionsilverman4195
      @dionsilverman4195 8 років тому +5

      It took a whole of 1.5-2 seconds. I don't like Economics (quantum chemistry major), and I still found it funny. And I'm a 27 year old boy. But maybe we just have different senses of humour.

  • @Phazratali786
    @Phazratali786 7 років тому

    nice