WHO THE CANUCKS ALMOST DRAFTED INSTEAD OF TOM WILLANDER… St Louis Blues-Detroit Red Wings Prospects

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 7 лют 2025
  • STAY SAFE ONLINE with ExpressVPN, the internet's #1 trusted virtual private network! Get 3 MONTHS FREE @ www.expressvpn... #ad
    SUPPORT the channel with SUPER THANKS! Contributors will be recognized with individualized comments, and my sincerest gratitude. CLICK the "$ THANKS" button to get started!
    Let's talk about the Vancouver Canucks 11th overall pick, and who else they wanted to draft instead of Tom Willander.
    ‪@SekeresPrice‬ Video: / 1674583939359584256
    This video is taking place after the 2023 NHL Entry Draft, and after the 2023 Stanley Cup Playoffs.
    The 2023 NHL Draft 1st Round went as follows:
    1st) Chicago Blackhawks, Connor Bedard
    2nd) Anaheim Ducks, Leo Carlsson
    3rd) Columbus Blue Jackets, Adam Fantilli
    4th) San Jose Sharks, Will Smith
    5th) Montreal Canadiens, David Reinbacher
    6th) Arizona Coyotes, Dmitri Simashev
    7th) Philadelphia Flyers, Matvei Michkov
    8th) Washington Capitals, Ryan Leonard
    9th) Detroit Red Wings, Nate Danielson
    10th) St. Louis Blues, Dalibor Dvorsky
    11th) Vancouver Canucks, Tom Willander
    12th) Arizona Coyotes (from Ottawa Senators), Daniil But
    13th) Buffalo Sabres, Zach Benson
    14th) Pittsburgh Penguins, Brayden Yager
    15th) Nashville Predators, Matthew Wood
    16th) Calgary Flames, Samuel Honzek
    17th) Detroit Red Wings (from New York Islanders via Vancouver Canucks), Axel Sandin Pellikka
    18th) Winnipeg Jets, Colby Barlow
    19th) Chicago Blackhawks (from Tampa Bay Lightning), Oliver Moore
    20th) Seattle Kraken, Eduard Sale
    21st) Minnesota Wild, Charlie Stramel
    22nd) Philadelphia Flyers (from Los Angeles Kings via Columbus Blue Jackets), Oliver Bonk
    23rd) New York Rangers, Gabe Perreault
    24th) Nashville Predators (from Edmonton Oilers), Tanner Molendyk
    25th) St. Louis Blues (from Toronto Maple Leafs), Otto Stenberg
    26th) San Jose Sharks (from New Jersey Devils), Quentin Musty
    27th) Colorado Avalanche, Calum Ritchie
    28th) Toronto Maple Leafs (from Boston Bruins via Washington Capitals), Easton Cowan
    29th) St. Louis Blues (from Dallas Stars via New York Rangers), Theo Lindstein
    30th) Carolina Hurricanes, Bradley Nadeau
    31st) Colorado Avalanche (from Florida Panthers via Montreal Canadiens), Mikhail Gulyayev
    32nd) Vegas Golden Knights, David Edstrom
    This video is also taking place after 2023 NHL Season, and after the 2023 Stanley Cup Playoffs, where the Vegas Golden Knights defeated the Florida Panthers in the Finals.
    Twitter: @LR99Gaming
    Portfolio: giopalermo.ca/
    Twitch: legorocks99
    Hi. I'm "Gio Palermo", also known as "legorocks99" ("legorocks99Gaming", "LR99Gaming", or "LR99"). I post video game commentaries on UA-cam revolving around "hockey", with a primary focus on "Vancouver Canucks", "Montreal Canadiens", "Detroit Red Wings", and top "NHL prospects" topics. These videos are uploaded with "NHL 23" gameplay in the background. I enjoy making these videos and I hope that you enjoy watching them!
    legorocks99 and all its denominations function under "Gio Palermo Media Inc."

КОМЕНТАРІ • 34

  • @mattwebb8234
    @mattwebb8234 Рік тому +15

    You can keep that pick. Stl will keep Dvorsky. Guy is a stud.

  • @Aidian1
    @Aidian1 Рік тому +11

    I think Dvorsky is going to atleast be a stud 2nd line shut down center behind Thomas one day. Very high on him.

    • @theramplocal
      @theramplocal Рік тому

      Same dude. Very high upside! LGB!!!

  • @thenuckler1062
    @thenuckler1062 Рік тому

    @ 3:30 Luke Schenn is the fastest player in the game

  • @mack8154
    @mack8154 Рік тому +6

    Blues will GLADLY keep Dvorsky lmao. And your logic is hilarious, you ALWAYS take best available in first round, ESPECIALLY when it's top 15 pick. Especially for defenseman, on avg they take five years to develop and make an impact in nhl, which in five years nhl rosters are VASTLY different. And even if you have logjam of talent at one position, you just MOVE some of it for a weakness.

  • @Septembersmith9633
    @Septembersmith9633 Рік тому +3

    Oh Lego smh...Depth>top line players wins you games. A wise GM plays the long game which is why people dislike Nate as a high pick. Teams draft BPA based on need not stats. That's why I laughed at anyone predicting Yzerman drafting a winger AT ALL! I might agree on why you might disagree with using the 9 pick to draft utility but when you need a premium commodity that best suits your team, you might need to reach a bit. That's why you take that R handed d man or that utility penalty kill C or Reinbacher at 5th. Fringe playoff teams are starting to bet on their farm team stock now so it's not about tanking for #1/bpa anymore its about that very specific need. At least not for teams like Detroit, Vancouver, Buffalo, etc who are pushing their way back up toward playoff success.

  • @Statsy10
    @Statsy10 Рік тому +5

    I too, was leery of Danielson, but a deeper dive into his stats reveals that most of his pre-WHL seasons had him averaging two points-per-game. It's quite possible that his offensive upside is still there waiting to be unleashed. I just wish we had a chance to view him in some international games where we could have seen him play with some top players, but he had some bad luck with the timing of the U18 events.

  • @bruceviviani3714
    @bruceviviani3714 Рік тому +2

    Love the Canucks fans and your massive copium.
    Calling Danielson and Dvorsky a player with a lower ceiling than the nucks pick is stupid.
    They were picked earlier for a reason, especially for teams like STL who could use a D-man.
    Dvorsky was simple the best player available

  • @ginostella8234
    @ginostella8234 Рік тому +4

    I think Vegas has proved that you have to roll 4 lines to win a cup if you don't have generational talent in your team.
    securing depth at center is not a bad way build a contending team. Connor Bedard commented that Danielson was the toughest guy to play again. Can you imagine Van Vs Chi playoff in the future and having a third line centre that matches with Connor?
    I think that is the rationale.

  • @lance2465
    @lance2465 Рік тому +5

    Surprised Danielson was getting top 12 hype after the draft including being picked at 9 by Detroit. When most mock drafts had him going around 16th or later.

    • @ericscottstevens
      @ericscottstevens Рік тому +5

      Detroit had no right handed center in their entire system. So Danielson was deemed the best of all the RHC's.
      Also Conner Bedard stated Danielson was the toughest opposing center to face in the WHL. So Detroit made the pick.

    • @florida1289
      @florida1289 Рік тому +5

      Sounds like Steve Yzerman knows what he's doing and the talking heads are just that

    • @austingill5223
      @austingill5223 Рік тому +4

      After watching the 3v3 tournament for detroit, I'm happy with the pick. Kid seems to have a good sense of getting to the net and staying involved in what's going on on the ice

    • @7srchoed
      @7srchoed Рік тому

      Every mock draft is done with incomplete information

  • @reeddixon5758
    @reeddixon5758 Рік тому

    I was hoping that danielson would get drafted by the Canucks since he is from Red Deer.

  • @Count3d
    @Count3d Рік тому +5

    Very interesting. Danielson value based on reliable floor. So a can't-miss pick in a sense? But really not sure why they would want just a reliable 3rd liner, great point. Intangibles we can't see perhaps? I really liked Dvorsky, would've been happy with him. I wasn't too big on Willander until a few weeks out from the draft the Canucks sub reddit swayed me. The more I find out about Willander the more excited I get.

    • @theramplocal
      @theramplocal Рік тому +2

      I have a feeling Danielson will be another huge pick aka seider. I'm happy my blues got dvorsky, I also think Vancouver will have a great day man in Wallander

    • @theramplocal
      @theramplocal Рік тому

      Dman

  • @bryantlawson6270
    @bryantlawson6270 Рік тому

    Simply put. Willander was a reach for Vancouver. Benson, Moore, Barlow, even Honzek are better options.

  • @kev2322
    @kev2322 Рік тому +1

    It was just developmental camp but nate looked good... think ur wrong on him.... seen people compare him to cozens

    • @bryantlawson6270
      @bryantlawson6270 Рік тому

      Cozens is a better skater and a little bigger. Danielson is better 2way

  • @ericscottstevens
    @ericscottstevens Рік тому +2

    I was thinking Detroit going with a Wallinder and Willander combo. Oh well.
    I was okay with Danielson, as the Detroit Lions had a player named Gary Danielson.
    Kept it in the name family.

  • @jamielennard3388
    @jamielennard3388 Рік тому +2

    Dvorsky was the dream scenario; a strong, physical, defensively responsible centre with a great shot. Happy with Willander though; Dvorsky falling was always a long-shot.

  • @polarisoutdoors3105
    @polarisoutdoors3105 Рік тому +1

    I think the Blues got lucky picking Dvorsky at #10. Time will tell how these lads will play out, but I think Dvorsky is the best right now over Daniellson and Willander

  • @johncastro2148
    @johncastro2148 Рік тому +3

    Dalibor would've been a great pick, ill take willander tho. Both great players

  • @YoungMatt81
    @YoungMatt81 Рік тому +1

    Danielson's profile reminds me of Brandon dubinsky a little bit
    Edit- also drafting based on future salary cap issues sounds like incredibly poor asset management

  • @andywhite40
    @andywhite40 Рік тому +1

    Willander is a good pick for the Canucks, you didn't need an "offensive" defenseman like ASP and with Reinbacher off the board Willander was an obvious choice. Some good players were overlooked by making that selection though but Willander is performing well in an adult league so there should be no concerns about his selection IMHO.

  • @epistiepucks_811
    @epistiepucks_811 Рік тому +4

    Noooooooo lego! Not after THIS week. Zadina was this mythical "BPA" you keep talking about; plus, since a bunch of idiot teams passed on him he was also the "draft steal of the century". A year later they called Sieder a "reach". Who's deciding BPA again? Cuz they don't seem so great at it. Yzerman chose Danielson because he liked his attitude during the interview, specifically about leading a struggling team since the Weat Kings were turrible. They are valuing leadership, and I'm for it.

  • @bwest2010
    @bwest2010 Рік тому

    Danielson's junior numbers are simply not high enough, especially as he is a big junior. With big kids in junior, unless elite skills are blatant, there is always a risk that their success, or a large part of it is simply because of size/strength. Everybody is strong at the next level so that advantage disappears.

  • @t-dot8368
    @t-dot8368 Рік тому +3

    If Benson, Dvorsky and Willander were all available my order would have been Dvorsky, Benson, and then Willander. I think we are going to watch Benson in the future and be jealous. Like us Canucks fans are with Tkackuk.

  • @rossgreggson4832
    @rossgreggson4832 Рік тому +1

    Lol in 2030 we’ll probably have a good idea if it was the right move or not

  • @7srchoed
    @7srchoed Рік тому

    Your opinion of Danielson is WRONG

  • @angelodaconceicao7614
    @angelodaconceicao7614 Рік тому

    Canucks could of have two top picked if they didn't win any Games or fired the coach 5 picked at 44 points screwed themselves at 11 or 12 islanders picked The Drafted never moved Down if canucks just lose games

  • @pierremichaux318
    @pierremichaux318 Рік тому +1

    I'm so bored of draft picks talkings.