The Impact of AI on Education, Work, and Jobs: Special Keynote
Вставка
- Опубліковано 20 тра 2024
- New: remixed and updated version: • Education, Work, Jobs:...
In this powerful, 180-degree-LED-walls-location, cinemax-like keynote, I address the impact of #artificialintelligence on #education, work and jobs. #futureofwork . Filmed in Warsaw at the Futurist of the year event, on April 11, 2024, the session provides a riveting analysis of how AI is shaping knowledge work, education and other sectors and what it all means for education institutions.
More about this amazing event futuristoftheyear.com/en/home/ (and thanks to the organisers for making this video available). #futurist
Go to @SzkolaKopernika and @futuristoftheyear for more videos!
👁️ What You Will Learn: AI's Influence in Education: Examination of AI’s integration into educational practices. Work Trends: Overview of how AI and automation are altering job roles and necessary skills. Job Creation through Innovation: Discussion on emerging job types due to technological progress. Ethical Considerations of AI: Consideration of ethical standards in the growing presence of AI.
We are to be architects of the future, not its victims!
If you work like a robot, a robot will take your job!
Embrace technology but don't become it.
Check out my book at www.techvshuman.com
📚 Exploring Futurism: Insights on how individuals can contribute to the field of futurism and influence technological developments.
👉 Watch the full presentation to gain a comprehensive understanding of AI’s current and potential roles in society. Presentation slides can be downloaded and viewed here: we.tl/t-wNieg47B1l
💬 Discussion Invitation:We invite you to share your views on AI’s impact in the comments section below. Subscribe to our channel for more discussions on technology and innovation.
✅ Subscribe and turn on notifications for updates on future presentations and expert discussions.
00:00 Introduction to Futurism
01:08 The Power of ChatGPT and the Future of Knowledge Work
03:16 Three Revolutions Shaping Our World
07:13 Exploring the Depths of Artificial Intelligence
15:23 The Impact of AI on Society and Trust
28:03 Navigating the Future: Humans vs. Machines
31:03 Redefining Education in the AI Era
31:36 Bolstering Human Intelligence and Creativity
35:00 The Evolution of AI: From Assistance to Autonomy (IA / AGI)
41:28 The Future of Work: Automation, Jobs, and Education
48:16 The Ethical Dilemmas of Advanced AI
56:21 Envisioning a Future with Balanced Human and Technological Growth
--------
Have a look at my films:
Look Up Now (2023): AI and the Future of Humanity: www.lookupnow.tv
TWICE UPON A TIME: • Twice upon a time: Our...
The Good Future www.thegoodfuturefilm.com
or • The Good Future: Beaut...
All about AI: www.weneedtotalkaboutai.com
or • We need to talk about ...
The future of work: www.howthefutureworks.tv
or • How The Future Works: ...
www.thegoodfutureexplained.com
Most of Gerd's videos can also be downloaded via my vimeo channel i.e. www.storiesfromthefuture.tv
#thegoodfuture #techvshuman #futurist
Please subscribe to this channel to never miss a thing, and be sure to share Gerd's videos if you like them. And hit that notification bell:))
Sign up for Gerd's 'Best Reads & Finds' curated futurist newsletter at www.gerd.digital/
Audio-only versions of most of Gerd's videos are available via SoundCloud / tracks , and Spotify see gerd.fm/spotify
If you enjoy Gerd's videos and talks, please take a look at his best-selling book “Technology vs Humanity” www.techvshuman.com - it's now available in 14 languages!
Gerd Leonhard Futurist, Author and Keynote Speaker Zürich / Switzerland www.futuristgerd.com
****For all booking inquiries please go here www.futuristgerd.com/contact/...
Twitter: @gleonhard
Great talk thank you
Glad you enjoyed it
I truly appreciate this, and I thank you for the update.
You bet
Thank you for your sharing @GerdLeonhard. I moslty agree with your vision except the so called "climate change". Climate is also very related to cosmos cycles; we could no longer be here as species and climate will still change on Earth. In other words, we will not "control" or eradicate climate change no matter what. Besides, the so called "fossil" fuel, we depend and will keep depending of it for many years to come. (to create materials that entirely come out from them)
Thanks for sharing
Never the less there's simply no drought, that the human produced climate change exists and creates a temperature spike in a speed we just can't adapt to fast enough.
About fossile fuel Dependance I agree. But very few understand how fast this base is eroding. The energy return on investment allready has plunged from 100:1 to 20:1 global for oil. Because of the low hanging fruits.
The only production growth in the last 15 years came from USA oil racking which now is expected to peak in the next 5 years.
And after this energy will become a bumpy downhill rude, because it's the master Ressource for everything
So your take is that humanities carbon foot print has zero effect on the natural process of climate change inherent to the earth itself. Therefore, there is no need to pursue alternative forms of energy to supply the world's energy needs. Put any and all R&D funds into finding and extracting more fossil fuels to supply the world's energy needs.
@@cujo1050 no, nothing that you wrote (assumed) is my take. I didn't say that anywhere.
This talk was exceptional ❤❤❤
I learned so much thanks
Glad you enjoyed it!
Thank you for sharing this very important information.👍
Can you make a specific video discussing what being a futurist is like and how you arrived to this today, i liked the video too
Already have that on this channel!
Yes discover, imagine visualising is the way to move from information to knowledge era
Thanks for sharing! Have you tried Suno AI for music creation? I had the same feeling you mentioned until I saw it in action.
Not yet! Will have a look
You do not have to know everything, you just have to know where to find it
Wow mind blowing thanks you talk what's in my mind
There are some things I categorically disagree with in regard to ai and reason, as well as ethics and morals. Everything a human does is based upon the knowledge systems, frameworks and environments in which the absorb data frame it based upon experience and then produce output. The only distinctipn at this point is humans can do all this in a more nuanced and multi faceted way. We werent talking about AI en masse 3 years ago and look where it is now. Imagine the exponential growth curve and then say it isnt really intelligent in an equivelant format to a human.
Sorry I dont agree on that point. Organism aren’t algorithms
I dont mind machine doing all jobs ... we have a be free for our only creation reason that to worship our almighty Allah reflect his kindness and mercy to all living beings elders children and animals
@@GerdLeonhardthat's not the point. Organisms are data analysing structures as well. They operate on a different hardware, are still more advanced, but have a comparable purpose, which is surviving. And this means their world models have to be correct to the point their survival is guaranteed.
That's not the case for ai at the moment. But they allready get selected out, while in this case not directly but indirect from humans. There's no reason that at a point they could be as wise as humans. No counciousness needed.
The danger rather is that you get an intraspecific selection for unuseful aims.
The evolution for them, selection from humans could lead to ideotic ais as well, and not to increasing world understanding
@@GerdLeonhard if you think about it they are. Just extremely advanced. We cannot make decisions outside of human parameters and human parameters our framed by out hardware (body) and environmental input. We dont exists outside of those things and to do so would make us non human.
Organisms have algorithms that we don't understand.@@GerdLeonhard
❤❤❤❤
I mostly agree with what you're talking about.
But I have to say this, that the airplanes metaphore sounds similar to how elevators used to have an operator.
Great Talk Gerd. What do you think about EQORIA, United Earth, the ownerless planetarian singularity infrastructure?
Creating depth depends on the prompt you give the fruit you generate depends on the intent you carry
38:23 education shift from instruction to discovery
Thank you very much for informative and inspiring talk. I am also concern about future where education is heading, especially for developing country like Thailand where I am from. I attended BETT Asia last October, the conversation were mainly related to "How AI will advance Education" Teacher has to adapt without any tangible action plan or any safety and privacy for young students in place. On the other hand kids in rural area don't even have access to nutritious meals at school let alone access to internet.
How can we make sure that the speed of change which AI act as accelerator will not widen inequality and poverty gap and not taking away opportunities, resources and well-being from those vulnerable cohort of students ?
good question... we will need much smarter governments
❤
grandeur
25:51 "social media" y'know there's also circumstantial evidence of it. I don't remember which place it was but fb was HUGE there so I think internet got cut off for an extended perioid or may be they didn't have access to fb for some time. my memory is hazy on the details but it was found out that people of that place became much more peaceful with much less hatred being observed in that time. once they got the access back it went back to how it was, losing these benefits.
edit: you gave evidence of it too. Should have listened before commenting lol
Thank you for an eye opening video! I would love to become a futurist. How can I be one?
study, read, speak, learn from the masters
@@GerdLeonhard Thank you!
I recommend reading a few books authored by top credible futurists. "The Singularity Is Nearer: When We Merge with AI" by Ray Kurzweil. "The Future Is Faster Than You Think: How Converging Technologies Are Disrupting Business, Industries, and Our Lives" by Peter Diamandis. Both Ray and Peter are highly respected and have driven quite a bit of technological development and progress in their own right. Welcome to the club @allankctan!
Well.
A guy, talking extremely confident about many subjects, he only studied very superficial, in a way, people may beleave it.
I love scientists, because they have to be precise and their ideas have to be peer reviewed. This all is just predicting from the color of your coffee..
His distinction about human and machine intelligence exactly is where experts are devided.
Studies have shown, that the advanced ai, s for some tasks, go beyond simple statistics and have to integrate, still very simple, but world models, that can only be described as unconscious understanding.
So in the long run his destination simply could be wrong.
Furtheremore his blind beleave in technology to solve our unsustainibility problems. Is rather a religion.
Did he ever hear from rebound effects?
Ai is the one tool that is the first, that not extends our bodey for the purpose of short term aims, but extends our ability to invent in the term of short term aims, ignoring never the less long term consequences we eve don't know, and in the service of company interests, multipolar political aims and with no wisdom at all what we should not do.
Its an armed race, and it's not solving the big issues, but accelerating our race to wealth and power while ignoring all longterm known and unknown consequences.
The world is based on öcological and physical restrictions.
I could argue hours, how this gets ignored or confused by his talk, but no chance in youtube to explain it so one could realy understand it.
The whole socioeconomic system with Al it's power and complex behavior remains a fully dependent subsystem of the ecospere and growth and only can grow by displacing the ecospere it is dependent on.
So as long as it remains smal, it's no problem. But it allready starts to debilitate it's host system, which ai only is accelerating
Based on this presentation and his other videos, Gerd is credible. Generalists can connect the dots across many areas. I am a technologist and am in the weeds (cloud architectures, databases, etc.) but not being a generalist I am unable to connect the dots and provide insights akin to Gerd.
@@jasonmurphy1499
@jasonmurphy1499 I am not of your opinion. He might be a generalist, regarding technical trends. But like so many he seems to oversee the whole biophysical baseman these technologies are dependent on.
We are telling us stories of progress and technical achievements, our genius has given us acces to.
But this realy is only half of what has enabled us to come so far.
The whole industrialization should rather be caled the Fossile full revolution, because that's realy what it is for 50000 years we where as genius as we are now. So what has changed.?
Of course Fossile fuels, that pushed away all natural negative feedbacks, that held us in check, so our species, the first time could show its full potential in exponential growth. (which by the way every species has when circumstances alow for it).
Each one of us has in average 100fold more energy available as 200 years ago. When beforehand 80% of population was needed to harvest energy.. Eg. Food, now Fossile energy allows us to feed our self with 2% of the population.
Each calorie you eat, has been made possible by investing 10 calories of fossil energy.
Which on it self will get devasting when fossil energy peaks and no replacement is there.
Moreover all our technical gimmicks an robots and ai wonders are the tip of a complexity pyramid, depending totaly on vast steady inputs of materials and energy even to maintain their structure. And only in such times of enormous energy input, gigantic economies of scale are possible.
Energy input is what makes selfkrganisig complex structures possible, as well true for biological complexity as for economies.
Take out the energy, and the system reorganize, often by collapse to reorganise on a simpler an less energy dependend structure.
This is what a real generalist would understand.
But I am not sure he has any clue of the underpinning system, his thechnophantasies are a subsystem of ond totaly dependent
@@tomschuelke7955 My apologies but what does "biophysical baseman" mean?
@@jasonmurphy1499 sorry... only biophysical base,
Decent talk and well done for covering so much, but lot's of questionable statements presented as facts.
- If you ask an AI what to vote or who to marry you will not get a concrete answer. At least not from any of the ones you should take half seriously.
- It is not at all clear that the human brain operates very different from a computer. We do not have many thoughts at once, we process them one at a time. Multitasking is a mirage. I personally do think there are quantum phenomena involved, and perhaps more, but still.
- Who are the superintelligent people who started all the wars? As far as I know higher inteligence is linked to more peaceful views and actions, not the opposite (there will always be exceptions, of course).
There were a lot of others, I just got annoyed enough to put down my remodelling tools and reply at the last one.
Will hear the rest now, differing views are always welcome and interesting.
good points but yes there are dating apps using AI eg in India www.betterhalf.ai/
@GerdLeonhard Valid point. And AI will be everywhere within a few years, so you'll certainly get this advice if you want to. Dating sites already have for years though, the AI there is just improving.
In Norway most people take voluntary web tests/quizes before elections to check which parties and political leaders align the most with your views. You can take the result as a good advice or ignore it.
With better AI the advice should become more trustworthy, but they'll still be based on our views or tastes, and we can still choose. For the foreseeable future at least.
I genuinely don't think UIs are going away unless AI proves to be better and faster at giving us a limited set of choices and let us explore those choices FAST. talking has limitations. the biggest one I see is speed. People like speed (shown by studies as well). I think we will use a combination. AI and new kinds of UIs that can be used to explore ideas and options FAST WITH AIs and the data they have access to.
Or may be you're right coz who knows what will happen lol
I tend to agree on graphic interfaces
I don't want to argue! What about changing bed sheets for in-patients in hospitals?!!
Tough gig for a bot
Before the time of Romeo and Juliet, men are women were not able to marry for love because they could not find 1 of the many soulmates we each have, but modernity enables more to do so than ever before in our history; yet we are still plagued by various forms of marriage that predates this. AI matchmaking offers access to another partnership that several communities have identified as twin flame mates. However, you call it, we may not have seen another level of marriage awaiting us, just like what awaited the generations at the time of Romeo and Juliet.
35:00 AI will not replace humans involved in art, entertainment, sports, etc., bc those involve feeling, that computers can't replicate, short of their achieving consciousness, which will take a while, if ever.
agreed
Disageed
Can't tell the difference between human and ai art and music....already. so who cares about if it's ai's feeling or human.
I'm not trying to be Anti Gerd. I like him and his video. BUT
Gerd says:
How does a machine think: ones and zeros.
Humans think multilateral like maybe today... Maybe next week .....it might be too hard etcetera... multilateral.
Technology is Exploding exponentially.
Gerd says we can't ask AI philosophical questions .
I beg to differ: AI responded thus:
To summarize, a key philosophical question to ask oneself when seeking a healthy relationship with a female partne is: "How can I foster understanding, empathy, and open communication while respecting individual differences and needs?" This question highlights the importance of a strong foundation based on mutual respect, understanding, and clear communication in building a successful partnership.
So i asked: Fostering understanding, empathy, and open communication while respecting individual differences and needs in a relationship can be achieved through the following practices:
1. **Active listening**: Pay attention to your partner's thoughts, feelings, and perspectives, and respond with empathy and understanding.
2. **Open-mindedness**: Be receptive to your partner's ideas and viewpoints, even if they differ from your own. Avoid being dismissive or judgmental.
3. **Emotional intelligence**: Develop the ability to recognize, understand, and manage your own emotions and those of your partner. This helps build a strong emotional connection.
4. **Effective communication**: Practice clear and respectful communication, expressing your thoughts and feelings while also considering your partner's perspective. Avoid blaming, criticism, or defensiveness.
5. **Acceptance**: Embrace the unique qualities, needs, and differences of your partner, demonstrating respect and appreciation for who they are as an individual.
6. **Conflict resolution**: Address disagreements and challenges in a constructive manner, focusing on finding solutions that meet both partners' needs.
By prioritizing these practices, you can create an environment of understanding, empathy, and open communication that nurtures a healthy and strong relationship.
Looks like AI is there already. Bedside manner and lateral thinking I'm not seeing 1's & 0's in the answer, even though they are the building blocks.
Cool but this is still just ‘fancy parrot “ behavior
We've never properly innovated especially in education..take calculator, type writers, use of audio & video tech reactions in education. Sectors tax funded don't like it. It's not like a farmer who took Jethro tull plow and wouldn't survive without adopting it day one atleast since bring forced to do so.
20 years ago we should've witness younger more efficiently trained youth entering the workforce but we didn't it was the opposite.
You would suspect nurse practitioners style incremental entry with more close nit interactive education closer to feilds and markets incremental growth and further education instead of removing 18-35 keeping them within a consolidation that has to move abroad creates lots of debt .
The west has many phases grandfathered in that's obstacles where as most of the world only industrialized after the transitor age.
You'd expect online coops subcontracted out skills & labor all under one domain closing loopholes for buyer,seller ,supplier, producer investor but it's slowly adopted reluctantly..lol
It's almost like open slate would be better to have an open canvas of medium density more spread out
56:13 - a whole talk about the dangers of AI, then he skips over "The Good Future" 😅
Wish I could reverse that
He says things that sound like they might be true, and feel true to a lot of people, but upon examination, are based on false categories, false distinctions. He is actually a bit of a Luddite in that regard. Technology is, of course, a tool. It is literally *how* humans do things. Ways and means. It goes back to our prehuman ancestors who kept making the same stone knives in the same way for thousands of years. Throughout much of our history technology changed very little. Over the past couple of centuries, however, humans have realized something: the technology we have is nowhere near what we could have, what the laws of physics allow, and what we can find a path toward developing. Further, as many people in Silicon Valley realize, all *material* problems are essentially technological problems. We don't know what kind of world is possible, how much better all of our lives could be, and what we're missing for lack of technologies that haven't yet been conceived. Some of us reasonably suspect that we should push forward, that there may be something of great value just over the horizon if we continue to reach for it.
Of course, we need the humanities because they help us find better solutions when it comes to issues of human *behavior* (e.g., morality and ethics, incentive structures, ways of relating to each other, etc.). We need the humanities as a complement to technological solutions, because they enable us to utilize technology in ways that are less destructive and more sustainable.
As to artificial intelligence -- it *is* intelligence. As to what it does, it *thinks*, or at least some forms of it do what can arguably be described as thinking and reasoning. No, it's not the same kind of intelligence that humans have. No, it doesn't think in exactly the same ways that humans do. It may not even be conscious in the sense that humans are. But look at the outputs it generates, the solutions it comes up with. We can't say these are less creative or less real merely because its process of arriving at these outputs is different from ours -- that *we* do real thinking, but it doesn't. Some talk about honoring the dignity of people on the autistic spectrum, respecting the differences in how they think -- honoring neurodiversity. We should also respect the dignity of the different kinds of intelligence that are instantiated in our machines -- large language models, diffusion models, etc... These other kinds of intelligence, though different from what we find in the human brain, are still worthy of respect, and still have value.
We need to get away from fear and hatred of Silicon Valley tech bros. They have something good to teach us about how to approach problems, how to approach the quest for knowledge, and how to approach technology, if we are willing and able to pick up on what that is. No, they aren't necessarily heroes or saviors, but they aren't necessarily villains either. They offer something of value, and not just in a monetary sense.
ok I see your points but ... this is not a black/white yes/no issue. We can have amazing technology and still remain human, - but probably not if it's all about more profit.imho
@@GerdLeonhard, like a lot of those tech bros, I support the idea of Universal Basic Income as a guarantee from the government to every citizen. If we could do that, then people wouldn't worry so much about ending up homeless out on the street. Perhaps then, the drive for profit would be better balanced with other concerns. I believe we'll get there some day.
And thank you for your reply.
Being 'politically right' is most important than daring to be politically incorrect.
meaning...?
@@GerdLeonhard I have watched many (if not all) of your future prediction video presentations and they are good, this one is its continuation. Yet I feel there is something basically missing not about technology but a radical social change and the human nature.
BLUE, not green planet !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
ok yes
Didn’t watch further than 12 min. Mostly don’t agree with anything he said up to that point. I think he is not as up to date on current and upcoming technology as he himself thinks he is and is greatly underestimating AI capabilities towards the future. Please tell me if I’m wrong or missed the point.
Wrong on both counts:)
@@GerdLeonhard alright if you say so I’ll watch the whole thing and get back to you
Yeah, if we join EU, I'll leave my country which has bright sunshine and live in cloudy, foggy, rainy, cold England(!)... So nonsense arguments. I think the opposite will be true... Even some retired English people live in Turkiye now... I don't understand how these so well educated English people buy this... And Turkish people are not monsters, they are just people... Turkish people will come to learn more science, for no other reasons.
I disagree about most of these claims and plugs.
Such as
You lose.
Great talk but very bad video editing… maybe should use AI…
we do, but this was recorded live so... there's limitations
@@GerdLeonhardno u doing great already, i love you
That's what I thought about assignment for organizing the house based on what we want and need most by element to each relative field in proper capacity for public health and safety relative to an individual hobbies and interests skills sets.
26:12 And that's exactly why we don't need to re-qualify for Medicaid or anything after we already got born, you don't need to qualify again, and again, and again, and again, for clean air and water food healthcare education travel freedom from malicious undue prosecution for extortion from every source including shelter and $2,000 per week per person for product testing and development enforcement of codes upgrades at all abandoned buildings into wheelchair accessible living facilities with aquaponic production lines of organic produce and industry the 50k things we can make from the sticks and stems from cannabis soldiers pick up prisoners civilian law enforcement pick up people in need distribute goods and services door to door throughout the community especially the farms ranches construction sites fisheries provide housekeeping groundskeeping maintenance personnel caregivers cosmologists therapists primary care physicians dentists and manufacturer recall of alcohol tobacco firearms high fructose corn syrup unhealthy frying fats pesticides and pollution from the market with replacement in the hydroelectric fuel cell recycling centers and septic tanks avocado oil agave cannabis tea with honey.
26:12 And that's exactly why we don't need to re-qualify for Medicaid or anything after we already got born, you don't need to qualify again, and again, and again, and again, for clean air and water food healthcare education travel freedom from malicious undue prosecution for extortion from every source including shelter and $2,000 per week per person for product testing and development enforcement of codes upgrades at all abandoned buildings into wheelchair accessible living facilities with aquaponic production lines of organic produce and industry the 50k things we can make from the sticks and stems from cannabis soldiers pick up prisoners civilian law enforcement pick up people in need distribute goods and services door to door throughout the community especially the farms ranches construction sites fisheries provide housekeeping groundskeeping maintenance personnel caregivers cosmologists therapists primary care physicians dentists and manufacturer recall of alcohol tobacco firearms high fructose corn syrup unhealthy frying fats pesticides and pollution from the market with replacement in the hydroelectric fuel cell recycling centers and septic tanks avocado oil agave cannabis tea with honey.
Often wrong and never in doubt. Sounds like a university professor.
leftie
Too much climate change talk
It’s never enough talk about climate emergency
Good talk but don't care about your political plugs
and which ones are those?