That’s so true. We know exactly why they want to be PM, for example. They know it too, then we play this “be polite” game in interviews and discussions.
Motivation could be viewed as the amount of hope, and or fear perceived in the pursuit of move away from and move towards goals. Essentially fear (pushing) and hope (pulling)....I posit that the lack of honesty and ownership towards said goals also amounts to our courage quotient! It takes courage to hope, it takes courage to move forwards under the weight of fear! Hope and fear are at the root of motivation. I suggest that you cannot begin to understand this until you understand the origin and purpose of hope and fear, and their polarity. Which is the better motivator? Fear is better at overcoming inertia, but it wasnt designed to be felt as a long term state. Hope is designed for the long term, and for direction. Hope is a lighthouse in this respect! We hope vaguely and fear precisely! Positive Psychology is the domain that studies these complex emotions and states scientifically. It bridges philosophy and psychology. Entertaining talk. I expected more science, philosophy and debate though...
Oh wow, the first Psychotherapist using movies to explain psychological theories instead of showing power point presentations with complicated figures. I love it.
This guy is a very good speaker and seems like a nice person to chat with. But this video was pretty useless to me for understanding the psychology of motivation. More over, about the internal and external thing. I agree that people might have a predisposition about to think their success has to do with their own actions or with the circumstances. What he fail to account for is that besides what are our opinions, there is a reality. And the reality of the circumstances that the new generations live in is different than what older generations lived in. Also, there is a ideology, that is party of the meritocratic ideal, that hard work is rewarded with success and successful people achieved it mainly through their own actions. Well, when you have an ideology that is now in conflict with reality in such a way you can't hide it anymore, people start to not adhere to it anymore. And worse, things are not going to get better anytime soon now. More over, he fails to mention the detriments of having the expectations of being successful by your own hands when the circumstances don't allow for it and you incorrectly take responsibilities for things that were truly out of your control. It brings unnecessary and unescapable guilt. Ultimately motivation has nothing to do with being external or internal. Because for the external, even if he believes that the circumstances are predominantly responsible for success or failure, he can still change the circunstances he put himself into. Maybe he did nothing wrong in that interview and failed anyway, but if he tries again in another company (ie. another circunstance) he will achieve what he wants. The important thing is to have self criticism and despite your own tendencies, try to have a honest view of when your failure and success is predominantly something you need to change on yourself or with you need to find a better environment where you can thrive.
Thanks for the detailed explanation, and though I can't reply in detail to this I can say that I agree on your points made. I also think that our socio-economic environment shapes us way more than we're usually aware of and yet in many regards we have more options to respond than we think. It ultimately boils down to the question of how much control we actually have on our lives, choices, moods and emotions or do we have a free will at all... The works of Robert Cialdini, Daniel Kahneman and Rory Sutherland have are quite interesting reads on these topics.
how embarrassing a presentation by a practitioner of dangerous pseudoscience. Typical over confidence and hubris - I feel sorry for those paying a fortune to see him.
I read his first book some 20+ years ago. This entire clip is a planned and scheduled, well timed series of set piece elements.
He’s that good.
This man is a genius........I am a huge fan
That’s so true. We know exactly why they want to be PM, for example.
They know it too, then we play this “be polite” game in interviews and discussions.
Motivation could be viewed as the amount of hope, and or fear perceived in the pursuit of move away from and move towards goals. Essentially fear (pushing) and hope (pulling)....I posit that the lack of honesty and ownership towards said goals also amounts to our courage quotient! It takes courage to hope, it takes courage to move forwards under the weight of fear!
Hope and fear are at the root of motivation. I suggest that you cannot begin to understand this until you understand the origin and purpose of hope and fear, and their polarity. Which is the better motivator? Fear is better at overcoming inertia, but it wasnt designed to be felt as a long term state. Hope is designed for the long term, and for direction. Hope is a lighthouse in this respect! We hope vaguely and fear precisely! Positive Psychology is the domain that studies these complex emotions and states scientifically. It bridges philosophy and psychology. Entertaining talk. I expected more science, philosophy and debate though...
Congratulation whatever you do don’t lose it
Excellent Content Doctor! Please keep talking and posting.
Oh wow, the first Psychotherapist using movies to explain psychological theories instead of showing power point presentations with complicated figures. I love it.
Yes will do.
Motivated to like and subscribe.
psychology class bringing me here bruh
🙌💯
After ten minutes, I'm stopping this. I got nothing from. Just a bunch of fast talking mumbo jumbo and NOTHING about the psychology of motivation.
Shame you stopped at 10 minutes.
This guy is a very good speaker and seems like a nice person to chat with. But this video was pretty useless to me for understanding the psychology of motivation.
More over, about the internal and external thing. I agree that people might have a predisposition about to think their success has to do with their own actions or with the circumstances. What he fail to account for is that besides what are our opinions, there is a reality. And the reality of the circumstances that the new generations live in is different than what older generations lived in. Also, there is a ideology, that is party of the meritocratic ideal, that hard work is rewarded with success and successful people achieved it mainly through their own actions. Well, when you have an ideology that is now in conflict with reality in such a way you can't hide it anymore, people start to not adhere to it anymore. And worse, things are not going to get better anytime soon now.
More over, he fails to mention the detriments of having the expectations of being successful by your own hands when the circumstances don't allow for it and you incorrectly take responsibilities for things that were truly out of your control. It brings unnecessary and unescapable guilt.
Ultimately motivation has nothing to do with being external or internal. Because for the external, even if he believes that the circumstances are predominantly responsible for success or failure, he can still change the circunstances he put himself into. Maybe he did nothing wrong in that interview and failed anyway, but if he tries again in another company (ie. another circunstance) he will achieve what he wants. The important thing is to have self criticism and despite your own tendencies, try to have a honest view of when your failure and success is predominantly something you need to change on yourself or with you need to find a better environment where you can thrive.
Thanks for the detailed explanation, and though I can't reply in detail to this I can say that I agree on your points made. I also think that our socio-economic environment shapes us way more than we're usually aware of and yet in many regards we have more options to respond than we think. It ultimately boils down to the question of how much control we actually have on our lives, choices, moods and emotions or do we have a free will at all...
The works of Robert Cialdini, Daniel Kahneman and Rory Sutherland have are quite interesting reads on these topics.
how embarrassing a presentation by a practitioner of dangerous pseudoscience. Typical over confidence and hubris - I feel sorry for those paying a fortune to see him.