I used to be strongly opposed to the NIV due to its gender language (2011 edition). I only used the ESV for preaching. Then one day I was giving a sermon and I addressed the believers there as "brothers and sisters". I don't know if anyone noticed, but I paused for a second, realizing what I just did. I was speaking English that came natural to me! The light bulb went on. This is why the NIV updated the gender language; we actually talk that way and they want to translate into English we actually use. I now own and love a copy of the NIV and would not hesitate to give it to new believers, people that aren't believers yet, and especially to Christians who use word for word translations and are probably misunderstanding something on every page (like I used to). Formal and functional translations are not mutually exclusive, they're mutually dependent; especially for Christians who don't know the original languages. But for the sake of all that is holy, we need to stop slandering the CBT (NIV translators), their motives, and their competency. They are top rate scholars and are being faithful to the translation philosophy of the NIV. If I don't stop ranting now, I never will. 🙂
It is a convention in Greek and Hebrew that if there is just one man present, the whole group must be addressed as 'brothers'. Contemporary English just does not work the same way. If you translate mechanically, you get bad English. Of course, we often cannot know the makeup of the group being addressed.
Well said, the NIV is simply writing in today's English. After all, when the Bible was written it was written in the common Greek of that time so that everyone can understand it, the NIV is trying to do the same in English..
Well said. One thing that helped me with the NIV was knowing who some of the scholars were in that committee. Some of the great conservative theologians of our time worked on the NIV 2011.
The older I get... The more I reach for an easy to understand Bible translation. I was raised NKJV and memorized plenty of it. It's still my favorite, but I appreciate being able to immediately understand what I'm reading. Thank God for the CSB BSB NLT and the NIV.
I became a Christian reading the NIV. My wife and four children also read it. I have started reading other translations, and especially like the NASB, but in the end, I always return to the NIV. Thanks for your video! 😀
Your bible quotes Jesus in a lie! BLASPHEMY. In John 7:8 those bibles have Jesus telling his brothers I am not going to the feast. I am not going to the feast means I am not going to the feast. Jesus waits and then goes! Liar. Jesus actually said I am not going up yet to the feast. No, not now, not yet. He waits and then goes. No problem. God left us a standard. He ssid He preserved His word. Psalm12:6,7. KJB. But not your bible, they want to leave it open for new information. They original manuscripts were replaced by the Alexandrian manuscripts. The Codex B or Vaticanus from the Vatican basement and the Sianiticus. These manuscripts do not agree with each other and the latter has about 30 changes per page. Tares Among the Wheat Sequal video UA-cam. Stop here and see what the Lord says about the RCC. "Now the Spirt speaketh expressly, that in the latter times some shall depart from the faith, giving heed to seducing spirits, and doctrines of devils, Forbidding to marry, and commanding to abstain from meats, which God hath created to be received with thanksgiving of them which believe and know the truth." 1 Timothy 4:1-3. Forbidding to marry is a doctrine of devils??? "These people drawer nigh unto me with their mouth, and honoreth me with their lips, but their heart is far from me. But in vain do they worship me, teaching for doctrines the commandments of men." Matthew 18:8-9. The RCC places their traditions equal to or greater than God's word. This is not acceptable to God. Plus, your church accepts a Jesus that lies. They have had many years to correct it. How amazing they have not cared to do it. Thri Jesus tells his brothers I am not going to the feast. Which means I am not going to the feast. Yet he goes. Liar. This is major BLASPHEMY. Jesus actually said I am not going up yet to the feast. Not now, not yet. He waits and then goes. No problem. No lie.
@@MichaelTheophilus906 Watch "10 Contradictions in Jehovah's Witness Teachings" on UA-cam ua-cam.com/video/9g5vKqUIH_s/v-deo.html Hope this helps. Not recommending.
The NIV is a good solid translation, excellent for reading. There is a reason it is so popular, it falls right in the middle of translation philosophy, easy to understand, accurate, and well researched. You should have several versions anyway, for study, and the Psalms have to be read KJV, so beautiful.
The history is very deep. It does take a little bit of effort to get used to because it is an older version ,but I assure you that the KJV is the version of the Bible you should read if you really want to hear the word of God. Please look for "New age Bible versions" A lecture by Gail Riplinger. If you really want to know the truth about the NIV Bible. This is a very serious matter.
I got saved watching the Gospel of John and reading the KJV. But the Baptist church I got Baptized at uses the NIV. So, I got some NIV Bibles now. I love how easy it is to understand.
Thanks again, Tim. I'm glad you explained the origin of coming from the NY Bible Society. I remember early credits for the publisher of the NIV as being something other than Biblica. I'm grateful that you explained the change from International Bible Society to Biblica. I have been trying to remember who that was recently.
The history is very deep. It does take a little bit of effort to get used to because it is an older version ,but I assure you that the KJV is the version of the Bible you should read if you really want to hear the word of God. Please look for "New age Bible versions" A lecture by Gail Riplinger. If you really want to know the truth about the NIV Bible. This is a very serious matter.
@@oscarlumberg8865Gail Riplinger? Pathological liar, and, KJV only heretic. Her so called "acrostic algebra" is nothing more than the spirit of divination or witchcraft. If you think you can assure anyone that the KJV is the "true word of God" you are deluded. The KJV translators knew their work was not perfect. What makes you and false teacher Gail Riplinger think you know better? KJV onlyism is a man made tradition with no scriptural support. One of Satan's most subtle deceptions. The gospel is about Christ and him crucified not some archaic imperfect uninspired translation called the KJV.. The NIV is far stronger on the deity of Christ and the Holy Spirit than the KJV. No wonder Satan has raised up false teachers like Gail Riplinger
Many years ago I did a time of intense prayer and devotion to reading the Bible which is the NIV (older than 2011 edition). It was such an amazing time of my life and I do believe it's a faithful translation, but it does have its limits. Those limits I seem to be hitting upon more and more often. Those limits usually express themselves in answering specific questions and looking more and more at other translations and the interlinear to see what has been written. I recently got a ESV and am devoting time to that and hope and pray that God gives me that type of insight and deeper understanding so I could be of greater help to others as well as a fresh perspective with a new version. So yes I do think the NIV is wonderful in so many ways and God does use that as He sees fit. It makes scriptures understandable and easy to read. I would recommend it as a top pick.
I love the NIV, it's my favourite translation because it's got that middle ground between formal and dynamic equivalence, and it's in today's English so everyone can understand it.
This was very informative, thank you for taking the time to do it. I really enjoy these videos, I hope you continue to do the other translations. Maybe even some of the more controversial ones. God bless!
Interesting video! NIV is definitely my favorite translation and the easiest for me to understand. I'm going to watch your other videos on bible translations. The bible translation chart you have is very interesting as well. I always thought the KJV was the first translation.
i started out a a KJV only and i actually have 3 of them, but i have to admit that i find it kinda hard to read and understand, so now i actually read, the NIV, CSB, ESV and NKJV.
Aaron Crawford yes and it is very unfortunate. I know a lot of people who have English as a second language and they got saved using the NIV and have been blessed by it.
Great video, Tim. The NIV is a strange anomaly because though it is the best selling English translation, it feels under appreciated. It’s one of my favourite translations for several reasons, some which you mentioned. But I also feel it has the best scholarship of any bible today. The translation team really are powerhouses in modern translation.
AS LONG AS NIV IS # 1..IT WILL BE AVAILABLE IN MANY STYLES. I LIKE THAT. ESPECIALLY IN BIG FONT AND CLEAR PRINT. IT IS THE CAMBRIDGE OF MODERN VERSIONS.
I was raised being taught that the kjv was the "only true" bible. I was also taught that the Holy Spirit would help me understand. As a child, I would spend hours reading and trying to understand. When I came across the niv as an adult, I was shocked! I could finally read and understand! Why insist that someone read a Bible in a language that they don't understand? And what about people that don't even speak English? Should they have to learn English just so they can read the only "correct" version? The niv has been a huge blessing to me.
Regarding salvation: God has a way to approach Him that pleases Him. "The Lord is nigh unto them that are of a broken heart and saveth them that be of a contrite spirit." Psalm 34:18. KJB. How can we know our deceptive wicked hearts are not deceiving us into feeling like we had that special moment when we got saved? Jeremiah 17:9. There are witnesses, according to the Apostle John, "And there are three that bear witness in earth, the Spirit, and the water, and the blood: and these three agree in one. " 1 John 5:8. Jesus said the same. "Jesus answered, Verily, verily, I say unto thee, Except a man be born of water and of the Spirit, he cannot enter into the kingdom of God." John 3:5. [Calvinism says God alone decides who will come, Arminianism says your free will can save you, just ask Him into your heart.] Jesus said that you can ask God to send the Holy Spirit. Luke 11:13. Ask! "He will come and rebuke the world of sin, and righteousness and judgment." John 16:8. When He comes He will bring your sins gently to mind. As he does, confess them to Jesus. Warning: this is painful because pride hates it!. When you awake to your desperate need for a Saviour, to your inability to change your nature (Jeremiah 17:9), the rebelliousness and enmity your sins have thrust at God, and the ingratitude and self love you have shown, CRY OUT to Jesus to save you. He came to save sinner, not the self righteous who do not 'see' their need. Thank Him. Then call upon the name of the Lord. How? As Peter told the Jews who were pricked in the heart. Acts 2:38. And as Paul did, Acts 22:16. Meditate on Romans 6:3-11, Colossians 2:6-15. [King James Bible on line.] He has treasures of truth about Himself, His perfect character, deep, deep love; He is gracious, merciful, slow to anger and of great kindness. And learn of His severity. His word is eternal, it judges the thoughts and intents of the heart. Hebrews 4:12. It prepares you for all good works that God has set aside for you to do. 2 Timothy 3:16. The Holy Ghost will use the eternal word to lead you into all truth. 1 John 2:27. Oh, how deeply He loves! He paid it all, yet we share in His inheritance in heaven.
I like how you said downside “negativity from people” all I see is so many people hate on it I personally love the NIV and that can become so frustrating part of the reason I even watched this video lol... I read other translations such as KJV, NKJV, ESV, NASB as well Bc of there popular word for word respect but the NIV I fell in love with and just love to read a lot... wish it wasn’t as hated on as it is, always feel pressured to use the others more, granted I think the NIV is good regardless to use as back up for others such as ESV , NASB etc... but I hate the discredit NIV gets
The history is very deep. It does take a little bit of effort to get used to because it is an older version ,but I assure you that the KJV is the version of the Bible you should read if you really want to hear the word of God. Please look for "New age Bible versions" A lecture by Gail Riplinger. If you really want to know the truth about the NIV Bible. This is a very serious matter.
As someone who's using English as second language,I appreciating NIV approach in using basic/intermediate English translation which made the reading feels smooth and easy to understand. So far,besides NIV, I have read NKJV,and I must say the former is more easier to read and understand than the latter. The only gripe I have on NIV is its 'political correctness' and neutrality. For example,I don't like the usage of 'he' when referring to God,which in my opinion should be spelled 'He'. However, I'm looking forward to read other versions of Bible out there. I don't believe in KJV-only cult. For me, it's silly to only read a version of Bible. Read whatever version of Bible which make you feel comfortable to read. 😊
Tim , the saddest story I heard about the niv was a Christian book salesman was assisting a new believer pick out her bible. She was so happy in her faith and as her name was being imprinted on her bible and man interjected himself into the conversation and informed her the niv was a terrible choice of the Bible and she her only choice was the KJV. Shocked and saddened the young woman took her purchase and left the store. The KJV onliest pulling splinters with two beams in both eyes. Forgive me for my insensitivity as I have acted the same way.
The history is very deep. It does take a little bit of effort to get used to because it is an older version ,but I assure you that the KJV is the version of the Bible you should read if you really want to hear the word of God. Please look for "New age Bible versions" A lecture by Gail Riplinger. If you really want to know the truth about the NIV Bible. This is a very serious matter.
@@oscarlumberg8865Gail Riplinger? Pathological liar and deceiver like all KJV only heretics. The KJV is nothing more than an imperfect uninspired translation.
Hey Oscar you can't assure anyone about what to read.Truly you Kjv onlyists should but out when not asked for your opinion. I assure you, that's what you should do. Toni's husband
The history is very deep. It does take a little bit of effort to get used to because it is an older version ,but I assure you that the KJV is the version of the Bible you should read if you really want to hear the word of God. Please look for "New age Bible versions" A lecture by Gail Riplinger. If you really want to know the truth about the NIV Bible. This is a very serious matter.
I'm from Los Angeles I want to visit grace church not sure if I just go and attend been out of the church for 7 years was a Jehovah witness had to heal for this 7 years from that cult can I just attend?
Its a thought for thought translation so its not really the KJV of our day but i wonder how it compares to the NLT. Obviously this is my personal opnion but i think the ESV is the modern day KJV but thats because its more word for word translation.
The history is very deep. It does take a little bit of effort to get used to because it is an older version ,but I assure you that the KJV is the version of the Bible you should read if you really want to hear the word of God. Please look for "New age Bible versions" A lecture by Gail Riplinger. If you really want to know the truth about the NIV Bible. This is a very serious matter.
It kills me the only response to this is from a KJV only person. The vast majority of Christians... Evangelical Christians... Do NOT agree with the KJV only bunch. Glad you believe in our Lord! Greetings from the USA
@@oscarlumberg8865Gail Riplinger is a liar and false teacher. Yet Satan has used her to deceive you into believing the lies she has said about the NIV. A brilliant translation that God is blessing and using to bring many to Christ. Yet you prefer to believe the blasphemous idolatrous Gail Riplinger. Her so called acrostic algebra is the spirit of divination or witchcraft.
@@sager31708 The Living Bible originally did (in 1 Sam. 20.30), but the NLT replaces it with "whore." Either translation accurately reflects the misogyny that was inherent in Saul's insult toward Jonathan (and his mother). I've noticed that the online version of the Living Bible places the "modern equivalent" in the margin and instead says "fool" in the text.
How many bibles do you own that quote Jesus in a lie? In John 7:8, their Jesus tells his brothers I am not going to the feast. I am not going to the feast means I am not going to the feast. He waits and then goes. Liar! Im.the KJB Jesus actually said, I am not going up yet to the feast. No, not now, not yet. He waits and then goes. No problem.
I agree that all the versions of the Bible share the same message and therefore I do not deny any but there is somethng in modern Bible translations including NIV is 2nd Samuel 21:19. We all know it was David who killed Goliath in 1st Samuel yet NIV says in 2nd Samuel it was Elhanan who killed Goliath while in fact, Elhanan killed Goliaths Brother. That is a clear translators mistake.
That chart is entirely misleading. The ESV and NRSV should be next to one another. The ESV and NIV are not nearly as far apart as the NIV detractors claim. The CEB was put next to the MSG and LB! Huh? The CEB should be much more to the left of the graph.
Singular they is illogical and ungrammatical. New Revised Standard Version Updated Edition 2021 (NRSVue) Mark 8:34: “He called the crowd with his disciples and said to them, “If any wish to come after me, let them deny themselves and take up their cross and follow me.” It should be wishes not wish. It's an error.
They did more than that. They switched from the original manuscripts to the Alexandrian manuscripts. The Codex B also called the Vaticanus from the Vatican basement and the Sianiticus. They disagree with each other and the latter has 30 changes per page. I'd that the God you want to learn from? See: Look What's Missing even in Revelation Also: Deadly Translation NKJV. Excellent info on the extent of the translation butchery of God's word. Book: Look What's Missing by David Daniels Chick.com. They have quoted Jesus in a lie, they have no shame. Whst ffg oes God say about that church? "Now the Spirt speaketh expressly, that in the latter times some shall depart from the faith, giving heed to seducing spirits, and doctrines of devils, Forbidding to marry, and commanding to abstain from meats, which God hath created to be received with thanksgiving of them which believe and know the truth." 1 Timothy 4:1-3. Forbidding to marry is a doctrine of devils??? "These people drawer nigh unto me with their mouth, and honoreth me with their lips, but their heart is far from me. But in vain do they worship me, teaching for doctrines the commandments of men." Matthew 18:8-9. The RCC places their traditions equal to or greater than God's word. This is not acceptable to God. Plus, your church accepts a Jesus that lies. They have had many years to correct it. How amazing they have not cared to do it. Their Jesus tells his brothers I am not going to the feast. Which means I am not going to the feast. Yet he goes. Liar. This is major BLASPHEMY. Jesus actually said I am not going up yet to the feast. Not now, not yet. No problem. No lie.
Ok, no one uses this in their translation consideration, but I just don’t like NIV translates sex as “made love” lol. Everyone else: “was intimate”, “knew”, “relations”...
My name is Glen Sheen from Cochin Kerala India I am desperately looking for this Bible but can't afford to buy it. Can anyone gift me this Bible please
Missing verses in the NIV- mathew 17:21, mathew 18:11, mathew 23:14, mark 7:16, mark 9:44, mark 11:46, mark 11:26, mark 15:28 , luke 17:36, luke 23:14, acts 8:37, acts 15:34, acts 24:7, acts 28:29 , john 5:4 , romans 16:24 1john 5:7... All missing verses and if you check the original story of the king james bible the history of it you will find that it took a long time the story of NIV is not accurate. I pray you get your facts right. Wolves in sheeps clothing
None of the verses you cited change the Gospel message, and are generally left out because there are either more reliable or earlier copies of the texts which were not available at the time of the KJV translation. These verses do not change the message of salvation (well...one might actually be re-introducing the law...you better forgive or no forgiveness for you!), or of the position of Jesus in bringing salvation to the lost. 1 John 5:7 is a notorious example of the KJV ADDING to the text what simply is NOT in the Greek. I do not doubt the sincerity of the people who embellished the KJV with this doctrinal truth, however they are just as "guilty" of paraphrasing as anyone else who attempts to insert their doctrinal stance into the word of God. I suggest meditating on Gal 5:18-21, paying careful attention to those who sow discord and confusion among the brethren. It is a work of the FLESH. Sadly most of the KJV only advocates like to condemn Christians to hell for not reading the KJV, but in doing so become guilty of looking to scripture for salvation, and not the one it points to. (John 5:39)
You are wrong sorry but the king james bible is the inspired word of God he dosent make mistakes God is alive in the king james bible and the only documents that are wrong the new versions are using the king james bible it is written even in the times of jesus and after there was false doctrines being written and also the Catholic church tried for centuries to distroy the truth which is in the king james the other translations use a corubted text I pray that God will open your eyes to the truth.
@@johnfoley2572 Nice. Your arguments are unassailable. I am glad to know that Jesus, and the disciples, as well as Paul and Silas all spoke to each other in 17th Century English. Shame the rest of the Roman world used Greek. Those pagans should have had the foresight to learn ye olde English! Thou hath schooleth me! Long live King James! God save the King!
Also the people who died to bring the word of God in english died by being burnt alive so yes these was men of God not profiteers to make money by changing Gods holy word and replacing them just so that they can profit by all these different translations wake up people.
The history is very deep. It does take a little bit of effort to get used to because it is an older version ,but I assure you that the KJV is the version of the Bible you should read if you really want to hear the word of God. Please look for "New age Bible versions" A lecture by Gail Riplinger. If you really want to know the truth about the NIV Bible. This is a very serious matter.
@@joehinojosa24 Remember this, the devil is very cunning and he operates in very subtle ways. He is the deceiver and the liar from the beginning. He is always twisting the words of God. In chapter 3 of genesis he said "Yea, hath God said, Ye shall not eat of every tree of the garden?" causing Eve to doubt what God had told her about not eating the forbidden fruit. He mixes truth with error. It may look and sound good but he has laced these other versions with poison. Very dangerous. Even the NKJV. One might be inclined to believe that it is just an updated easier to read version of the KJV, but not so. It too has been altered, albeit more subtly.
Nkjv waters down in Rom 11;13. It says Paul was " an " apostle to the gentiles..that's incorrect . Apostle Paul was "the "apostle to the gentiles. The KJV, Niv, and the Nlt all get it right. Apostle Paul was the apostle to the gentiles..Toni's husband
No. Thank you sir. The NIV has changed the meaning of several core Bible Doctrines, and has many missing verses, changes to many verses. KJV is the only Bible for me.
Vicki Sage: Throw away your Chick Publications! The Evangelist St. Mark, is historically purported to have been sent to Alexandria to bring the gospel message to the Egyptians. The Coptic church is of ancient duration. Although not a Coptic Christian myself, it is preferable to much of modern Protestantism.
Vicki Sage. Where's the historical evidence of what you're talking about? where are the witnesses about you're talking about who lived at a time? King James only onliest think that the alexandrian texts are corrupted. Bible scholars who are experts in the Greek and Hebrew language have clearly stated that the alexandrian texts are good. In fact as far as I know the NIV is not inspired from the alexandrian texts.
Oh really do you know the KJV uses the word Easter in Acts rather than the correct word Passover and it uses the word piss a lot rather than urine .And the Textus Receptus is corrupt !
You probably don’t understand the KJV as well as you think you do. There are probably many instances where you think you know the meaning of the text but the actual meaning goes right over your head. The older style of language combined with a high level of literalness makes it difficult to understand, despite what you think.
Vicki Sage. There is absolutely nothing wrong with the King James Version! What is wrong, are those people who will proclaim that that version alone is the Word of God, and all others being perversions. Some also think the Greek should be corrected using the KJV. I tend to see that as a dangerous viewpoint! I was once a KJV only person. Praise God, no longer true!
I used to be strongly opposed to the NIV due to its gender language (2011 edition). I only used the ESV for preaching. Then one day I was giving a sermon and I addressed the believers there as "brothers and sisters". I don't know if anyone noticed, but I paused for a second, realizing what I just did. I was speaking English that came natural to me! The light bulb went on. This is why the NIV updated the gender language; we actually talk that way and they want to translate into English we actually use. I now own and love a copy of the NIV and would not hesitate to give it to new believers, people that aren't believers yet, and especially to Christians who use word for word translations and are probably misunderstanding something on every page (like I used to). Formal and functional translations are not mutually exclusive, they're mutually dependent; especially for Christians who don't know the original languages. But for the sake of all that is holy, we need to stop slandering the CBT (NIV translators), their motives, and their competency. They are top rate scholars and are being faithful to the translation philosophy of the NIV. If I don't stop ranting now, I never will. 🙂
It is a convention in Greek and Hebrew that if there is just one man present, the whole group must be addressed as 'brothers'. Contemporary English just does not work the same way. If you translate mechanically, you get bad English. Of course, we often cannot know the makeup of the group being addressed.
Well said, the NIV is simply writing in today's English. After all, when the Bible was written it was written in the common Greek of that time so that everyone can understand it, the NIV is trying to do the same in English..
Well said. One thing that helped me with the NIV was knowing who some of the scholars were in that committee. Some of the great conservative theologians of our time worked on the NIV 2011.
The older I get... The more I reach for an easy to understand Bible translation. I was raised NKJV and memorized plenty of it. It's still my favorite, but I appreciate being able to immediately understand what I'm reading. Thank God for the CSB BSB NLT and the NIV.
I became a Christian reading the NIV. My wife and four children also read it.
I have started reading other translations, and especially like the NASB, but in the end, I always return to the NIV.
Thanks for your video!
😀
You're welcome. Thanks for commenting, and thanks for subscribing!
Your bible quotes Jesus in a lie! BLASPHEMY.
In John 7:8 those bibles have Jesus telling his brothers I am not going to the feast. I am not going to the feast means I am not going to the feast. Jesus waits and then goes! Liar.
Jesus actually said I am not going up yet to the feast. No, not now, not yet. He waits and then goes. No problem.
God left us a standard. He ssid He preserved His word. Psalm12:6,7. KJB.
But not your bible, they want to leave it open for new information.
They original manuscripts were replaced by the Alexandrian manuscripts. The Codex B or Vaticanus from the Vatican basement and the Sianiticus.
These manuscripts do not agree with each other and the latter has about 30 changes per page.
Tares Among the Wheat Sequal video UA-cam.
Stop here and see what the Lord says about the RCC.
"Now the Spirt speaketh expressly, that in the latter times some shall depart from the faith, giving heed to seducing spirits, and doctrines of devils,
Forbidding to marry, and commanding to abstain from meats, which God hath created to be received with thanksgiving of them which believe and know the truth." 1 Timothy 4:1-3.
Forbidding to marry is a doctrine of devils???
"These people drawer nigh unto me with their mouth, and honoreth me with their lips, but their heart is far from me.
But in vain do they worship me, teaching for doctrines the commandments of men." Matthew 18:8-9.
The RCC places their traditions equal to or greater than God's word. This is not acceptable to God.
Plus, your church accepts a Jesus that lies. They have had many years to correct it. How amazing they have not cared to do it.
Thri Jesus tells his brothers I am not going to the feast. Which means I am not going to the feast. Yet he goes. Liar.
This is major BLASPHEMY.
Jesus actually said I am not going up yet to the feast. Not now, not yet. He waits and then goes. No problem. No lie.
@@MichaelTheophilus906
I am mot familiar with his teachimgs, so i am not recommending him, but hope this is helpful.
@@MichaelTheophilus906
Watch "10 Contradictions in Jehovah's Witness Teachings" on UA-cam
ua-cam.com/video/9g5vKqUIH_s/v-deo.html
Hope this helps. Not recommending.
Sorry. It dif not copy. Here it is.
The NIV is a good solid translation, excellent for reading. There is a reason it is so popular, it falls right in the middle of translation philosophy, easy to understand, accurate, and well researched. You should have several versions anyway, for study, and the Psalms have to be read KJV, so beautiful.
The history is very deep. It does take a little bit of effort to get used to because it is an older version ,but I assure you that the KJV is the version of the Bible you should read if you really want to hear the word of God. Please look for "New age Bible versions"
A lecture by Gail Riplinger. If you really want to know the truth about the NIV Bible. This is a very serious matter.
Any one who follows this channel will be well versed in the arguments for and against KJV onlyism.
No, the Psalms have to be read in Cranmer's translation - as in the Church of England Book of Common Prayer (if you don't read Hebrew).
I was saved reading NIV.. using my NIV study bible but I also check on esv, nasb and nkjv
NIV will always be my most favorite. Christian standard bible second bringing tied 3rd are NASB 2020 and the ESV.
I love my NIV Bible.
I got saved watching the Gospel of John and reading the KJV. But the Baptist church I got Baptized at uses the NIV. So, I got some NIV Bibles now. I love how easy it is to understand.
How are u saved ?
1st Cor 15:1-4 that's how.Tonis husband
I am proud to be a Christian nerd like you 🙏🏼
Thanks again, Tim. I'm glad you explained the origin of coming from the NY Bible Society. I remember early credits for the publisher of the NIV as being something other than Biblica. I'm grateful that you explained the change from International Bible Society to Biblica. I have been trying to remember who that was recently.
The history is very deep. It does take a little bit of effort to get used to because it is an older version ,but I assure you that the KJV is the version of the Bible you should read if you really want to hear the word of God. Please look for "New age Bible versions"
A lecture by Gail Riplinger. If you really want to know the truth about the NIV Bible. This is a very serious matter.
@@oscarlumberg8865Gail Riplinger? Pathological liar, and, KJV only heretic. Her so called "acrostic algebra" is nothing more than the spirit of divination or witchcraft. If you think you can assure anyone that the KJV is the "true word of God" you are deluded. The KJV translators knew their work was not perfect. What makes you and false teacher Gail Riplinger think you know better? KJV onlyism is a man made tradition with no scriptural support. One of Satan's most subtle deceptions. The gospel is about Christ and him crucified not some archaic imperfect uninspired translation called the KJV.. The NIV is far stronger on the deity of Christ and the Holy Spirit than the KJV. No wonder Satan has raised up false teachers like Gail Riplinger
Daniel Wallace endorses it. He is one of the leading scholars behind NET.
Many years ago I did a time of intense prayer and devotion to reading the Bible which is the NIV (older than 2011 edition). It was such an amazing time of my life and I do believe it's a faithful translation, but it does have its limits. Those limits I seem to be hitting upon more and more often. Those limits usually express themselves in answering specific questions and looking more and more at other translations and the interlinear to see what has been written. I recently got a ESV and am devoting time to that and hope and pray that God gives me that type of insight and deeper understanding so I could be of greater help to others as well as a fresh perspective with a new version. So yes I do think the NIV is wonderful in so many ways and God does use that as He sees fit. It makes scriptures understandable and easy to read. I would recommend it as a top pick.
I love the NIV, it's my favourite translation because it's got that middle ground between formal and dynamic equivalence, and it's in today's English so everyone can understand it.
Your videos are outstanding
This was very informative, thank you for taking the time to do it. I really enjoy these videos, I hope you continue to do the other translations. Maybe even some of the more controversial ones. God bless!
Is there a particular translation you wanted to hear more about?
@@AFrischPerspective NET Bible, please.
Interesting video! NIV is definitely my favorite translation and the easiest for me to understand. I'm going to watch your other videos on bible translations. The bible translation chart you have is very interesting as well. I always thought the KJV was the first translation.
Sadly the NIV gets a bad rap and it is a great translation and one of the most popular ones in the world. Thank you for doing this video.
Agreed! And thanks for watching and commenting on the videos!
The KJV only crowd loves to beat this version up too.
i started out a a KJV only and i actually have 3 of them, but i have to admit that i find it kinda hard to read and understand, so now i actually read, the NIV, CSB, ESV and NKJV.
the NIV and CSB give me the best understanding of the scriptures.
Aaron Crawford yes and it is very unfortunate. I know a lot of people who have English as a second language and they got saved using the NIV and have been blessed by it.
Great video, Tim. The NIV is a strange anomaly because though it is the best selling English translation, it feels under appreciated.
It’s one of my favourite translations for several reasons, some which you mentioned. But I also feel it has the best scholarship of any bible today. The translation team really are powerhouses in modern translation.
Thanks Lewis! Great points
One of my Bibles is an NIV ‘84 top grain reference. Gorgeous 🙏🏼☺️
AS LONG AS NIV IS # 1..IT WILL BE AVAILABLE IN MANY STYLES. I LIKE THAT. ESPECIALLY IN BIG FONT AND CLEAR PRINT. IT IS THE CAMBRIDGE OF MODERN VERSIONS.
I use a NIV when I'm speed reading. But base doctrine on NASB.
Thanks for a honest review
I was raised being taught that the kjv was the "only true" bible. I was also taught that the Holy Spirit would help me understand. As a child, I would spend hours reading and trying to understand. When I came across the niv as an adult, I was shocked! I could finally read and understand! Why insist that someone read a Bible in a language that they don't understand? And what about people that don't even speak English? Should they have to learn English just so they can read the only "correct" version? The niv has been a huge blessing to me.
Regarding salvation:
God has a way to approach Him that pleases Him. "The Lord is nigh unto them that are of a broken heart and saveth them that be of a contrite spirit." Psalm 34:18. KJB.
How can we know our deceptive wicked hearts are not deceiving us into feeling like we had that special moment when we got saved? Jeremiah 17:9.
There are witnesses, according to the Apostle John,
"And there are three that bear witness in earth, the Spirit, and the water, and the blood: and these three agree in one. " 1 John 5:8.
Jesus said the same. "Jesus answered, Verily, verily, I say unto thee, Except a man be born of water and of the Spirit, he cannot enter into the kingdom of God." John 3:5.
[Calvinism says God alone decides who will come, Arminianism says your free will can save you, just ask Him into your heart.]
Jesus said that you can ask God to send the Holy Spirit. Luke 11:13. Ask!
"He will come and rebuke the world of sin, and righteousness and judgment." John 16:8.
When He comes He will bring your sins gently to mind. As he does, confess them to Jesus. Warning: this is painful because pride hates it!.
When you awake to your desperate need for a Saviour, to your inability to change your nature (Jeremiah 17:9), the rebelliousness and enmity your sins have thrust at God, and the ingratitude and self love you have shown, CRY OUT to Jesus to save you. He came to save sinner, not the self righteous who do not 'see' their need. Thank Him.
Then call upon the name of the Lord. How? As Peter told the Jews who were pricked in the heart. Acts 2:38. And as Paul did, Acts 22:16.
Meditate on Romans 6:3-11, Colossians 2:6-15. [King James Bible on line.]
He has treasures of truth about Himself, His perfect character, deep, deep love; He is gracious, merciful, slow to anger and of great kindness. And learn of His severity.
His word is eternal, it judges the thoughts and intents of the heart. Hebrews 4:12. It prepares you for all good works that God has set aside for you to do. 2 Timothy 3:16.
The Holy Ghost will use the eternal word to lead you into all truth. 1 John 2:27.
Oh, how deeply He loves! He paid it all, yet we share in His inheritance in heaven.
Great video, I love the NIV!!!
Thanks a lot. I learned a lot.
Great to hear! Thanks for the comment!
I like how you said downside “negativity from people” all I see is so many people hate on it I personally love the NIV and that can become so frustrating part of the reason I even watched this video lol... I read other translations such as KJV, NKJV, ESV, NASB as well Bc of there popular word for word respect but the NIV I fell in love with and just love to read a lot... wish it wasn’t as hated on as it is, always feel pressured to use the others more, granted I think the NIV is good regardless to use as back up for others such as ESV , NASB etc... but I hate the discredit NIV gets
Read NIV, shalom!
Wow, never saw you without a cap!
I really like the niv. I'm about half way through it right now.
I read NIV too but for some reason people say its manipulated by the Devil :(
That's because they're not very bright. Toni's hubby
I like NIV BASED ON CRITICAL TEXT.
The history is very deep. It does take a little bit of effort to get used to because it is an older version ,but I assure you that the KJV is the version of the Bible you should read if you really want to hear the word of God. Please look for "New age Bible versions"
A lecture by Gail Riplinger. If you really want to know the truth about the NIV Bible. This is a very serious matter.
Hello. Brother. I,m. from. South. Africa. But. I. live. in. Taiwan. Can. You. Tell. Me. Where. Can. I. Find. Niv. Bible. Thank. Uou. Brother. Shalom
You like periods. 😂
You mentioned that the NIV is a modern KJV bible for today. How would you sum up the NIV bible compared to the NKJV and the amplified bible?
As someone who's using English as second language,I appreciating NIV approach in using basic/intermediate English translation which made the reading feels smooth and easy to understand. So far,besides NIV, I have read NKJV,and I must say the former is more easier to read and understand than the latter. The only gripe I have on NIV is its 'political correctness' and neutrality. For example,I don't like the usage of 'he' when referring to God,which in my opinion should be spelled 'He'. However, I'm looking forward to read other versions of Bible out there. I don't believe in KJV-only cult. For me, it's silly to only read a version of Bible. Read whatever version of Bible which make you feel comfortable to read. 😊
Shalom!!
The inclusive language problem is why the evangelical church I attend has shifted tot he ESV.
Tim , the saddest story I heard about the niv was a Christian book salesman was assisting a new believer pick out her bible. She was so happy in her faith and as her name was being imprinted on her bible and man interjected himself into the conversation and informed her the niv was a terrible choice of the Bible and she her only choice was the KJV. Shocked and saddened the young woman took her purchase and left the store. The KJV onliest pulling splinters with two beams in both eyes. Forgive me for my insensitivity as I have acted the same way.
The history is very deep. It does take a little bit of effort to get used to because it is an older version ,but I assure you that the KJV is the version of the Bible you should read if you really want to hear the word of God. Please look for "New age Bible versions"
A lecture by Gail Riplinger. If you really want to know the truth about the NIV Bible. This is a very serious matter.
@@oscarlumberg8865 Gail Riplinger is the LAST person on the planet I would consult to inform anyone about Bible versions.
@@oscarlumberg8865You are incorrect. Watch the KJVO debates with James White.
@@oscarlumberg8865Gail Riplinger? Pathological liar and deceiver like all KJV only heretics. The KJV is nothing more than an imperfect uninspired translation.
Hey Oscar you can't assure anyone about what to read.Truly you Kjv onlyists should but out when not asked for your opinion. I assure you, that's what you should do. Toni's husband
AS LONG AS NIV IS # 1. IT WILL BE BEST. AND MOST POPULAR. AND AVAILABLE IN MORE STYLES AND BIG PRINT.
What’s your opinion of the NLT?
The history is very deep. It does take a little bit of effort to get used to because it is an older version ,but I assure you that the KJV is the version of the Bible you should read if you really want to hear the word of God. Please look for "New age Bible versions"
A lecture by Gail Riplinger. If you really want to know the truth about the NIV Bible. This is a very serious matter.
A great translation. I wish I would have discovered it many years ago. Toni's husband
@@oscarlumberg8865KJV onlyism is a very serious matter. Because it is a satanic deception.
With the NIV, I like the gender neutral pronouns because in the original KJV it sounds like it was gearing towards men, and I'm a woman.
I'm from Los Angeles I want to visit grace church not sure if I just go and attend been out of the church for 7 years was a Jehovah witness had to heal for this 7 years from that cult can I just attend?
Yes, you can just show up. But it will probably be very crowded. I think there is meeting space outside as well as in the auditorium. Not sure though.
@@AFrischPerspective thanks
I love my teenager NIV BIBLE
Its a thought for thought translation so its not really the KJV of our day but i wonder how it compares to the NLT. Obviously this is my personal opnion but i think the ESV is the modern day KJV but thats because its more word for word translation.
Did you used to work at First Baptist Church in Aston, PA?
Wait no, that was Ron and Michelle... you’re his brother right?
I haven't live in the USA for over 25 years, and I still have a bunch of English translations of the Bible. 📖📘📕📓📜📖
The history is very deep. It does take a little bit of effort to get used to because it is an older version ,but I assure you that the KJV is the version of the Bible you should read if you really want to hear the word of God. Please look for "New age Bible versions"
A lecture by Gail Riplinger. If you really want to know the truth about the NIV Bible. This is a very serious matter.
It kills me the only response to this is from a KJV only person. The vast majority of Christians... Evangelical Christians... Do NOT agree with the KJV only bunch. Glad you believe in our Lord! Greetings from the USA
@@oscarlumberg8865Gail Riplinger is a liar and false teacher. Yet Satan has used her to deceive you into believing the lies she has said about the NIV. A brilliant translation that God is blessing and using to bring many to Christ. Yet you prefer to believe the blasphemous idolatrous Gail Riplinger. Her so called acrostic algebra is the spirit of divination or witchcraft.
Brothe please do a video on NLT translation.
Thanks for the suggestion! I've been thinking about it. I also had a request for the NRSV.
I love the NLT. It's one of my favorites.
That bible has the b word in it
@@sager31708 Where? And in what context?
@@sager31708 The Living Bible originally did (in 1 Sam. 20.30), but the NLT replaces it with "whore." Either translation accurately reflects the misogyny that was inherent in Saul's insult toward Jonathan (and his mother). I've noticed that the online version of the Living Bible places the "modern equivalent" in the margin and instead says "fool" in the text.
I’m almost ashamed to say Thst this is one translation I don’t have, but I have read parts of it,mand it was definitely an easy read.
How many bibles do you own that quote Jesus in a lie?
In John 7:8, their Jesus tells his brothers I am not going to the feast. I am not going to the feast means I am not going to the feast. He waits and then goes. Liar!
Im.the KJB Jesus actually said, I am not going up yet to the feast. No, not now, not yet. He waits and then goes. No problem.
I agree that all the versions of the Bible share the same message and therefore I do not deny any but there is somethng in modern Bible translations including NIV is 2nd Samuel 21:19. We all know it was David who killed Goliath in 1st Samuel yet NIV says in 2nd Samuel it was Elhanan who killed Goliath while in fact, Elhanan killed Goliaths Brother. That is a clear translators mistake.
I read that it's not a translation error. The Hebrew text doesn't have it and the KJV inserted brother to clarify that it was Goliath's brother.
@@JohnPatricio661 As far as I know Hebrew text has brother in it 😂
@@predragjo5977 in the 1984 edition of the NIV yeah we do see that error you're talking about, but in the 2011NIV I think it was corrected .
@@carloswater7 Ohh, ty buddy 😊😊
it was KJV insertion of Brother.. but check nasb and esv
MIDDLE OF ROAD IS GOOD PLACE TO BE.
which one you read
NIV is written for a grade 8 reading level which leads to its wide usage!
That chart is entirely misleading. The ESV and NRSV should be next to one another. The ESV and NIV are not nearly as far apart as the NIV detractors claim.
The CEB was put next to the MSG and LB! Huh? The CEB should be much more to the left of the graph.
Singular they is illogical and ungrammatical. New Revised Standard Version Updated Edition 2021
(NRSVue) Mark 8:34: “He called the crowd with his disciples and said to them, “If any wish to come after me, let them deny themselves and take up their cross and follow me.”
It should be wishes not wish. It's an error.
Grammarians! Love it!
But they removed the word "begotten" a word that is in the original Greek!
They did more than that. They switched from the original manuscripts to the Alexandrian manuscripts. The Codex B also called the Vaticanus from the Vatican basement and the Sianiticus. They disagree with each other and the latter has 30 changes per page. I'd that the God you want to learn from?
See: Look What's Missing even in Revelation
Also: Deadly Translation NKJV.
Excellent info on the extent of the translation butchery of God's word. Book: Look What's Missing by David Daniels Chick.com.
They have quoted Jesus in a lie, they have no shame.
Whst ffg oes God say about that church?
"Now the Spirt speaketh expressly, that in the latter times some shall depart from the faith, giving heed to seducing spirits, and doctrines of devils,
Forbidding to marry, and commanding to abstain from meats, which God hath created to be received with thanksgiving of them which believe and know the truth." 1 Timothy 4:1-3.
Forbidding to marry is a doctrine of devils???
"These people drawer nigh unto me with their mouth, and honoreth me with their lips, but their heart is far from me.
But in vain do they worship me, teaching for doctrines the commandments of men." Matthew 18:8-9.
The RCC places their traditions equal to or greater than God's word. This is not acceptable to God.
Plus, your church accepts a Jesus that lies. They have had many years to correct it. How amazing they have not cared to do it.
Their Jesus tells his brothers I am not going to the feast. Which means I am not going to the feast. Yet he goes. Liar.
This is major BLASPHEMY.
Jesus actually said I am not going up yet to the feast. Not now, not yet. No problem. No lie.
The problem with gender wording is that sometimes God is speaking to a certain gender. If the text is clear of that fact then no problem
I GROW UP IN TEENAGERS BIBLE NIV IN YOUTH GROUP
Never says he would not love us again or lost his reproductive ability?
Kjv is not the first English bible
Ok, no one uses this in their translation consideration, but I just don’t like NIV translates sex as “made love” lol. Everyone else: “was intimate”, “knew”, “relations”...
Me too! That’s precisely why I don’t use NIV.
Why are you on this site?
My name is Glen Sheen from Cochin Kerala India I am desperately looking for this Bible but can't afford to buy it. Can anyone gift me this Bible please
Pretty sure you would be able to buy an NIV in a city.
I'm getting judge on NIV BIBLE
Missing verses in the NIV- mathew 17:21, mathew 18:11, mathew 23:14, mark 7:16, mark 9:44, mark 11:46, mark 11:26, mark 15:28 , luke 17:36, luke 23:14, acts 8:37, acts 15:34, acts 24:7, acts 28:29 , john 5:4 , romans 16:24 1john 5:7...
All missing verses and if you check the original story of the king james bible the history of it you will find that it took a long time the story of NIV is not accurate. I pray you get your facts right. Wolves in sheeps clothing
None of the verses you cited change the Gospel message, and are generally left out because there are either more reliable or earlier copies of the texts which were not available at the time of the KJV translation. These verses do not change the message of salvation (well...one might actually be re-introducing the law...you better forgive or no forgiveness for you!), or of the position of Jesus in bringing salvation to the lost.
1 John 5:7 is a notorious example of the KJV ADDING to the text what simply is NOT in the Greek. I do not doubt the sincerity of the people who embellished the KJV with this doctrinal truth, however they are just as "guilty" of paraphrasing as anyone else who attempts to insert their doctrinal stance into the word of God.
I suggest meditating on Gal 5:18-21, paying careful attention to those who sow discord and confusion among the brethren. It is a work of the FLESH. Sadly most of the KJV only advocates like to condemn Christians to hell for not reading the KJV, but in doing so become guilty of looking to scripture for salvation, and not the one it points to. (John 5:39)
You are wrong sorry but the king james bible is the inspired word of God he dosent make mistakes God is alive in the king james bible and the only documents that are wrong the new versions are using the king james bible it is written even in the times of jesus and after there was false doctrines being written and also the Catholic church tried for centuries to distroy the truth which is in the king james the other translations use a corubted text I pray that God will open your eyes to the truth.
@@johnfoley2572 Nice. Your arguments are unassailable. I am glad to know that Jesus, and the disciples, as well as Paul and Silas all spoke to each other in 17th Century English. Shame the rest of the Roman world used Greek. Those pagans should have had the foresight to learn ye olde English! Thou hath schooleth me! Long live King James! God save the King!
@@wfp9378 textus receptors the greek used in Antioch translated by irasimus the genuine text 👍
Also the people who died to bring the word of God in english died by being burnt alive so yes these was men of God not profiteers to make money by changing Gods holy word and replacing them just so that they can profit by all these different translations wake up people.
NIV Doesn't sound like a Bible. It is a contemporary translation without GRAVITAS. NKJV sounds like a Bible.
The history is very deep. It does take a little bit of effort to get used to because it is an older version ,but I assure you that the KJV is the version of the Bible you should read if you really want to hear the word of God. Please look for "New age Bible versions"
A lecture by Gail Riplinger. If you really want to know the truth about the NIV Bible. This is a very serious matter.
@@oscarlumberg8865 Thanks. I know you care about the certainty of faith be preserved
@@joehinojosa24 Remember this, the devil is very cunning and he operates in very subtle ways. He is the deceiver and the liar from the beginning. He is always twisting the words of God. In chapter 3 of genesis he said "Yea, hath God said, Ye shall not eat of every tree of the garden?" causing Eve to doubt what God had told her about not eating the forbidden fruit. He mixes truth with error. It may look and sound good but he has laced these other versions with poison. Very dangerous. Even the NKJV. One might be inclined to believe that it is just an updated easier to read version of the KJV, but not so. It too has been altered, albeit more subtly.
Nkjv waters down in Rom 11;13. It says Paul was " an " apostle to the gentiles..that's incorrect . Apostle Paul was "the "apostle to the gentiles. The KJV, Niv, and the Nlt all get it right. Apostle Paul was the apostle to the gentiles..Toni's husband
No thanks.
No. Thank you sir. The NIV has changed the meaning of several core Bible Doctrines, and has many missing verses, changes to many verses. KJV is the only Bible for me.
16 missing verses, IIRC
What Bible doctrines are changed by the NIV?
Love my king James Bible,,, you people trying to making money off God words
Did u know that the kjv is word perfect from the hebrew bible.It was from antioch all these other bibles are from Alexandria egypt dump.
Vicki Sage: Throw away your Chick Publications!
The Evangelist St. Mark, is historically purported to have been sent to Alexandria to bring the gospel message to the Egyptians. The Coptic church is of ancient duration.
Although not a Coptic Christian myself, it is preferable to much of modern Protestantism.
Vicki Sage. Where's the historical evidence of what you're talking about? where are the witnesses about you're talking about who lived at a time? King James only onliest think that the alexandrian texts are corrupted. Bible scholars who are experts in the Greek and Hebrew language have clearly stated that the alexandrian texts are good. In fact as far as I know the NIV is not inspired from the alexandrian texts.
Oh really do you know the KJV uses the word Easter in Acts rather than the correct word Passover and it uses the word piss a lot rather than urine .And the Textus Receptus is corrupt !
If you can’t understand the King James Bible it’s because you’re not saved.
What a ridiculous sentence, only people that can read English are saved then?
@@Imsaved777 That's a depraved response
You probably don’t understand the KJV as well as you think you do. There are probably many instances where you think you know the meaning of the text but the actual meaning goes right over your head. The older style of language combined with a high level of literalness makes it difficult to understand, despite what you think.
@@stevetucker5851 Your opinion means nothing to me; being a theologian, I know where I am coming from.
You sound like a Pharisee
Money making with these bibles
Why are you taking about the erroneous NIV Bible?.
The niv is very dark all these new bible are very wicked.
Willful ignorance.
Your opinion of the niv is very dark and very wicked :-(
Why? God has bought many to christ via the niv
Vicki Sage.
There is absolutely nothing wrong with the King James Version! What is wrong, are those people who will proclaim that that version alone is the Word of God, and all others being perversions. Some also think the Greek should be corrected using the KJV. I tend to see that as a dangerous viewpoint!
I was once a KJV only person. Praise God, no longer true!
@@shirleygoss1988 Praise the Lord for your deliverance and liberation; happy for you :-)