So I've read Babel, and unlike the majority of the time, I really cannot pinpoint whether I liked this book or not. There were parts of it that were certainly interesting but historically and linguistically I'm not qualified enough to evaluate the quality of the subject matter and the themes. As for character wise I thought they were very shallow and anachronistically modern which threw me off quite a bit, but in contrast the vibes were immaculate. Basically I'm struggling to have an informed, set opinion of this book, and so I'm really curious to hear your thoughts on this!
I don't mention the anachronistically modern aspects (review was too long as it was) but I agree with you there! Hope you enjoy the review! To echo your thoughts about conflicted feelings, I found that I thought it was solid for the first third, but the more it went on the more my enthusiasm waned.
I definitely really enjoyed this book a lot while reading it, but got somewhat more conflicted after putting it down. Kuang does do fantastic work setting things out, but I was sold a lot more on the transformation than it seems you were. While the characters don't have to deal with the downfall, I think the (spoilers) death of Robin is damning him for avoiding those consequences as well as the choice to give up and not fight on that Victoire takes. There's also a portion describing the collapse of London bridge that I think illustrates the consequences well. If I remember correctly, I think the "how far should we take this" argument also isn't quite as clean old/young - victoire fights back against him on that too. I do agree with you about the characters being flat though - I felt that some of the more extended cast felt quite one-note. The main criticism I had after putting it down was similar to that of the Poppy War, if you've read that, in that it moved too fast in going towards the final act. The books both accelerate rapidly, and occasionally left me confused from the speed. Thankfully here Kuang returns to the original setting for the finale, so that we don't have the issues with locations blurring and information not being communicated clearly that The Poppy War had. In other brief notes - I think I was able to buy into this more as a fantastical narrative and world than you seemed to in your review, and from that I didn't really see the problems with the worldbuilding that you picked up. Though some of them make sense in hindsight, I can't really say that any of them troubled me while reading. The easy style picked me up and carried me through. That's possibly the best bit about Kuang's style, and i agree with you that she has very good writing, a very readable style.
Thanks for your interesting thoughts! When it comes to dealing with the consequences, I accept that she does address them, but I think still in a detached way. To go into a bit more detail, not only is everything described at a distance, but she also mitigates the damage a lot with either convenient reasons why few people were injured, or odd expressions like "dozens" of people were harmed, when in reality it's more like "hundreds" or even "thousands." I think you're right RE Robin's death though, it does show some acknowledgement of going too far. But equally, I can't help but get the sense that he is equally framed as a kind of martyr figure. Victoire does fight back, but the description of the vote is just "Old say hold back, young say go forward." I think it's still a lazy way to describe a scene and reduce people to identity groups. Obviously, you can't give subtlety to everything, but given that this happens a few times throughout the novel, it bugs me. I've not read the Poppy War (and probably won't! :P ) but I do agree with you here about the pacing. The first portion with Robin's development and arrival at Oxford was very atmospheric and well done. But as soon as Lovell goes, the pace goes zooming! To some extent that makes sense; she's crafting a world in the first half, whereas she's destroying it in the second! But it was quite the shift! Glad that you enjoyed the book though, and she does have a readable style!
Your mouth-piece comment sort of reminds me of the end of The Ninth House. I feel like it does more disservice to the message of the story than anything. I wish authors, including ones I like, would stop doing it that.
Joshua, currently on the fourth disc of Babel audiobook , actually like the book, reminds me of Anne Rice at times, but it certainly has a certain angle behind it, I get tired of the Europe evil and cause of all the world’s woes i.e. British Empire agenda. Will need to go back and watch your videos on it when I am through. Greetings from Kansas😀
@@JoshuaJClarkeKelsall well, since I wrote the comment have gotten about half way and the anti European Colonialism axe the author has to grind is starting to wear thin on me. Never listened to a audiobook that has a different voice, in this case a Female upper class British voice come in and read the footnotes. Hearing the Chinese words pronounced is interesting to hear
You nailed this review! You've articulated what I havent been able to about this book. Thank you from colonised Australia! 🇦🇺
So I've read Babel, and unlike the majority of the time, I really cannot pinpoint whether I liked this book or not. There were parts of it that were certainly interesting but historically and linguistically I'm not qualified enough to evaluate the quality of the subject matter and the themes. As for character wise I thought they were very shallow and anachronistically modern which threw me off quite a bit, but in contrast the vibes were immaculate. Basically I'm struggling to have an informed, set opinion of this book, and so I'm really curious to hear your thoughts on this!
I don't mention the anachronistically modern aspects (review was too long as it was) but I agree with you there! Hope you enjoy the review!
To echo your thoughts about conflicted feelings, I found that I thought it was solid for the first third, but the more it went on the more my enthusiasm waned.
@12:18
"They watched the death and violence from their Ivory Tower."
Did she at least notice the hypocrisy? 🙄
I would like to think, with a line like that, she definitely would have.
@@JoshuaJClarkeKelsall i hear vengeance is bad for everyone.
I definitely really enjoyed this book a lot while reading it, but got somewhat more conflicted after putting it down. Kuang does do fantastic work setting things out, but I was sold a lot more on the transformation than it seems you were. While the characters don't have to deal with the downfall, I think the (spoilers) death of Robin is damning him for avoiding those consequences as well as the choice to give up and not fight on that Victoire takes. There's also a portion describing the collapse of London bridge that I think illustrates the consequences well.
If I remember correctly, I think the "how far should we take this" argument also isn't quite as clean old/young - victoire fights back against him on that too.
I do agree with you about the characters being flat though - I felt that some of the more extended cast felt quite one-note.
The main criticism I had after putting it down was similar to that of the Poppy War, if you've read that, in that it moved too fast in going towards the final act. The books both accelerate rapidly, and occasionally left me confused from the speed. Thankfully here Kuang returns to the original setting for the finale, so that we don't have the issues with locations blurring and information not being communicated clearly that The Poppy War had.
In other brief notes - I think I was able to buy into this more as a fantastical narrative and world than you seemed to in your review, and from that I didn't really see the problems with the worldbuilding that you picked up. Though some of them make sense in hindsight, I can't really say that any of them troubled me while reading. The easy style picked me up and carried me through. That's possibly the best bit about Kuang's style, and i agree with you that she has very good writing, a very readable style.
Thanks for your interesting thoughts! When it comes to dealing with the consequences, I accept that she does address them, but I think still in a detached way. To go into a bit more detail, not only is everything described at a distance, but she also mitigates the damage a lot with either convenient reasons why few people were injured, or odd expressions like "dozens" of people were harmed, when in reality it's more like "hundreds" or even "thousands."
I think you're right RE Robin's death though, it does show some acknowledgement of going too far. But equally, I can't help but get the sense that he is equally framed as a kind of martyr figure.
Victoire does fight back, but the description of the vote is just "Old say hold back, young say go forward." I think it's still a lazy way to describe a scene and reduce people to identity groups. Obviously, you can't give subtlety to everything, but given that this happens a few times throughout the novel, it bugs me.
I've not read the Poppy War (and probably won't! :P ) but I do agree with you here about the pacing. The first portion with Robin's development and arrival at Oxford was very atmospheric and well done. But as soon as Lovell goes, the pace goes zooming! To some extent that makes sense; she's crafting a world in the first half, whereas she's destroying it in the second! But it was quite the shift!
Glad that you enjoyed the book though, and she does have a readable style!
Your mouth-piece comment sort of reminds me of the end of The Ninth House. I feel like it does more disservice to the message of the story than anything. I wish authors, including ones I like, would stop doing it that.
A reviewer said it makes a better essay than novel.
Joshua,
currently on the fourth disc of Babel audiobook , actually like the book, reminds me of Anne Rice at times, but it certainly has a certain angle behind it, I get tired of the Europe evil and cause of all the world’s woes i.e. British Empire agenda.
Will need to go back and watch your videos on it when I am through. Greetings from Kansas😀
I can't say I'm glad that you're not enjoying the book, even if I didn't, so I'll just say greetings from the UK instead! :P
@@JoshuaJClarkeKelsall well, since I wrote the comment have gotten about half way and the anti European Colonialism axe the author has to grind is starting to wear thin on me.
Never listened to a audiobook that has a different voice, in this case a Female upper class British voice come in and read the footnotes.
Hearing the Chinese words pronounced is interesting to hear