Physics - Mechanics: Stress and Strain (5 of 16) Young's Modulus

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 23 січ 2025

КОМЕНТАРІ • 106

  • @CalzoneDR
    @CalzoneDR 10 років тому +17

    I would like to take a step back from this moment of clarity and thank you for taking the time to explain physics in a way that anyone could understand. So with my utmost sincerity "Thank you".

  • @flymoto3870
    @flymoto3870 8 років тому +2

    Sir,I am so glad that i came across your channel.Engineering never felt so easy before i watched you teaching.I never saw such a an amazing n enthusiastic professor in my 22 years of education.You the best.

  • @MichelvanBiezen
    @MichelvanBiezen  11 років тому +6

    In the portion of the problem where I use the blue color, (delta L / Lo = 0.01) so you don't have to divide by 1.75.

  • @jamieedwards2996
    @jamieedwards2996 11 років тому +9

    I'm 30, been out of school for 10+ years and have just started an engineering course (online). Your videos are well paced and super clear and I will be using them as a resource throughout my studies. Thank you!!

    • @aalex3267
      @aalex3267 5 років тому

      how is your engineering course going on?

    • @mayrajloredo87
      @mayrajloredo87 3 роки тому

      Online? Where? I am 33

  • @stepsvideos
    @stepsvideos 7 років тому +2

    Every time I need to brush up on something, or fill in a gap, there you are. Thank you very much!

  • @ryanmartin3012
    @ryanmartin3012 9 років тому +10

    You are amazing, thank you so much :). You're the reason why I currently have an A in my general physics class!

  • @jameserayburn
    @jameserayburn 8 років тому +2

    I finally have a perfect understanding of stress and strain. Awesome explanations as usual.

  • @samhuver9822
    @samhuver9822 5 років тому +1

    Thank you. I have been at my homework for hours and I finally figured it out with the help of this.

  • @ATrekafied
    @ATrekafied 9 років тому +5

    Tell me again why I need my professor xD Thank you Michel!! You are awesome.

  • @_arefayne8378
    @_arefayne8378 8 років тому +1

    Thank you professor! No words to say, just you are the Man!

  • @MrJapogm
    @MrJapogm 2 роки тому +1

    I believe the Force at the end of the video should be in N, not Pa. Thanks a lot for these videos. Michael is an awesome teacher.

  • @markbryant1781
    @markbryant1781 6 років тому +2

    Was over-thinking it. Thanks for breaking it down Barney-style.

  • @1StraightPath2Islam
    @1StraightPath2Islam 8 років тому +1

    Why are most physics teachers in college nowadays hopeless. My teacher just runs his own race on the blackboard while everyone are trying to catch up writing it all down. I have to give it it to you Michel, without your videos and the videos of other teachers on UA-cam, my understand of physics would have been way less.
    Thank you, greetings from Sweden, Örebro

    • @MichelvanBiezen
      @MichelvanBiezen  8 років тому +2

      I remember similar experiences when I went to school. Glad to be of help and welcome to the channel!

    • @wanted1729
      @wanted1729 8 років тому

      glad to know that , someone who knows how we suffer haha

  • @bryan0734
    @bryan0734 10 років тому +1

    very clear and understandable
    best video of YOUNG MODULUS

  • @VishalFlutist
    @VishalFlutist 5 років тому +1

    Thanks for sharing these educational stuff ,helps me alot in my work. Thanks again. (Embossing on mild steel )
    Vishal (mechanical engg,India)

  • @gwendolynboahemaa2216
    @gwendolynboahemaa2216 4 роки тому

    Great, please could you work on this question and explain; Some physical property of a hypothetical material is as follows; Young's Modulus = 2.0 x 10^11 Pa , Poisson's ratio = 0.30 and electrical resistivity = 8.0 x 10^-4 Ωm.Find the change in resistance of a wire made of the material of the given dimensions when a 2.0m length of wire of cross sectional area 5.0mm squared is stretched by a 0.40 KN tensile force

  • @francescakho7750
    @francescakho7750 9 років тому

    Thanks! My lecturer gives confusing Symbols to represent change in length, force and Young's modulus..i understood yours clearly, thanks again.

  • @rahultiwari9003
    @rahultiwari9003 9 років тому

    Sir, in case a steel wire and a copper wire are of equal length and equal area of cross section are joined end to end and the combination is subjected to a tension,the tension in both the wires are equal.Why is it so ?

  • @andrewdunbar3951
    @andrewdunbar3951 8 років тому +2

    Great lecture videos. Very useful.

  • @nyashagumbo5958
    @nyashagumbo5958 7 років тому +2

    the video was very use full it made me to realy understand

  • @elgatovolador5510
    @elgatovolador5510 8 років тому

    Professor, will the young's module change if the object was heated? For example, Iron would be easier to deform but I don't know if it would necessarily be easier to compress because the atoms would be moving faster so the object would have a greater resistance to compression, right?

  • @lasarith2
    @lasarith2 3 роки тому +1

    Can this calculation also be used for compressive strength, ?
    Ps: since it’s actually 211Gpa instead of 210Gpa which you used the answer should be 0.02073459 mm.

    • @MichelvanBiezen
      @MichelvanBiezen  3 роки тому +2

      Compressive strength refers to the maximum load per unit area that can be applied before the material breaks down. The units are force per unit area, which is the same as the units for pressure.

    • @lasarith2
      @lasarith2 3 роки тому +1

      @@MichelvanBiezen I’m trying to work out what the compression (size ) of SiO2 for 1CM3 block at 1.1Gpa (The Compressive strength ) at (4000 Newtons ) My own number gives me (0.36mm (using this Young’s modulus @ the same 1.1Gpa ( the actual young’s is 71.1 Gpa) I get 0.0363636mm , (10mm > 9.64mm or 9.9636364mm )
      Edited to give the correct number.

    • @lasarith2
      @lasarith2 3 роки тому +1

      @@MichelvanBiezen ps: if I used the actual number for young’s I get approximately 56.33 nanometers.

    • @MichelvanBiezen
      @MichelvanBiezen  3 роки тому +2

      Young's modulus = (F/A) / (delta L / Lo) = P Lo / delta L Therefore delta L = P Lo / Y Is that the equation you used? What are the values you plugged in?

    • @lasarith2
      @lasarith2 3 роки тому

      @@MichelvanBiezen 🤦🏼 ignore the 0.011 that’s the Bulk modulus, the correct number is closer to 0.36mm for 1.1Gpa
      Own - 1.1Gpa M2 > 110,000 cm2 (4000 N) ~ approximately 0.36mm
      Young (@ 1.1Gpa > 4000 x 0.01. /0.01 / 1,100,000,000 = 0.00000363636,
      Young(@71.1 Gpa> 4000 x 0.01 /0.01. / 71,000,000,000 = 5.63380282e-8 (approx 56.33 nanometers)

  • @sajudali7220
    @sajudali7220 7 років тому +1

    how find young modulus from stress-strain diagram

  • @Passco666
    @Passco666 5 років тому

    Is there any modulus which I can apply for no solid materials?Let say yarns from fibers?

    • @MichelvanBiezen
      @MichelvanBiezen  5 років тому

      There are for some materials, but the modulus is typically used for solid materials.

  • @rissalatahmed6719
    @rissalatahmed6719 8 років тому +4

    shouldn't the area be 0.04m instead of 0.02?

    • @MichelvanBiezen
      @MichelvanBiezen  8 років тому

      Neither. The area is (0.02m)^2 = 0.0004 m^2 as indicated in the video.

    • @anaaya3131
      @anaaya3131 7 років тому

      Yes, that is what I thought because area= b*h= 2*2=4 4cm = 4*10^-2m = 0.04m not (0.02)^2

  • @gedionalemsaged9544
    @gedionalemsaged9544 3 роки тому +1

    Mr. Can ask some question realted problem if you don't mind????🙏

    • @MichelvanBiezen
      @MichelvanBiezen  3 роки тому +1

      We try to answer all questions as time permits.

  • @acechesterbernabe777
    @acechesterbernabe777 9 років тому +3

    The last example is 2,100,000,000N = 21 x 10^8 Newtons right?

    • @MichelvanBiezen
      @MichelvanBiezen  9 років тому +3

      +Ace Chester Bernabe
      Yes, I forgot to cancel out the m^2.

    • @acechesterbernabe777
      @acechesterbernabe777 9 років тому +1

      thank you very much!
      i thought i was wrong hahaha!!!
      at least i am learning XD

  • @linaj9976
    @linaj9976 9 років тому +7

    the last example .. F= 21*10^8 (Pa.m^2) = 21*10^8 N

  • @menxsk8
    @menxsk8 7 років тому +1

    Im not sure about the way you calculate the area, for a 3D rectangle (which is ideally a cuboid), you can get the surface
    area (= 2(l*h + b*h + l*b)). So how it comes you only multiplay 2cm*2cm? pls help me :) And btw, great videos :)

    • @MichelvanBiezen
      @MichelvanBiezen  7 років тому

      We are calculating the cross sectional area.

  • @EBREEZ100
    @EBREEZ100 9 років тому

    Thank you for helpful explanation,,but i have a dot!!! why did you divided 0.02 with (21x10) 10 ??

  • @wanted1729
    @wanted1729 8 років тому +4

    9:50 i guess there a mistake in the unit at this time , it must be N

    • @MichelvanBiezen
      @MichelvanBiezen  8 років тому +4

      That is correct. The proper unit for force is Newton. Thanks for bringing that to my attention.

    • @r.m8345
      @r.m8345 7 років тому

      Michel van Biezen Hey Michael I have a question for you why did you ignore the normal force and didn't calacuate the dL of at then add it to the main force dL

  • @joshuamcnamara2326
    @joshuamcnamara2326 8 років тому

    Hi Thanks for the help.
    im still having trouble getting the same answer as you. Can you explain how to enter it into a calculator please?
    thanks

    • @MichelvanBiezen
      @MichelvanBiezen  8 років тому

      Let me know what you entered into your calculator.

    • @joshuamcnamara2326
      @joshuamcnamara2326 8 років тому

      Hi Thanks for your reply. i figured it out i didnt use brackets.
      thanks

  • @sebastiancevallos4970
    @sebastiancevallos4970 3 роки тому

    (referencing the first problem) I was a bit confused by A = 2cm x 2cm, wouldn't that make the area 4cm?

    • @MichelvanBiezen
      @MichelvanBiezen  3 роки тому +1

      Yes, it is written as: (2 cm)^2 = 4 cm^2

    • @sebastiancevallos4970
      @sebastiancevallos4970 3 роки тому

      @@MichelvanBiezen I just completed the entire Stress and Strain playlist, thank you so much!! Looking forward to another successful physics semester taught primarily by your lectures haha

    • @MichelvanBiezen
      @MichelvanBiezen  3 роки тому

      keep it going

  • @heinmt3178
    @heinmt3178 8 років тому

    so what is the difference between tensile strength and young's modulus?

    • @MichelvanBiezen
      @MichelvanBiezen  8 років тому +1

      +Hein MT Young's modulus is the ratio of the stress to the strain. That is independent on the shape or dimensions of an object, and only depends on the material. Tensile strength is the ultimate "strength" and object has against damage or destruction. It depends on the size and shape of the object, as well as the material it is made of. It answers the question: " How much force can you apply before it breaks?"

    • @heinmt3178
      @heinmt3178 8 років тому

      +Michel van Biezen Thank you :)

    • @heinmt3178
      @heinmt3178 8 років тому

      +Michel van Biezen how do we get those Young's modulus value?

  • @lamlam225
    @lamlam225 9 років тому +1

    is it necessary to make the answer to be mm?

    • @MichelvanBiezen
      @MichelvanBiezen  9 років тому +2

      +paco gor
      It doesn't matter. You can express it in any units.

  • @hybenbabs
    @hybenbabs 10 років тому

    Great teaching, thanks!
    But isn't the unit of the force required to deform a 1 by 1 meter iron beam supposed to be in Newton and not in Pascal? (The last calculation you're doing)

    • @MichelvanBiezen
      @MichelvanBiezen  10 років тому

      hybenbabs,
      You are correct. That should indeed be Newtons not Pascals.

    • @hybenbabs
      @hybenbabs 10 років тому

      Ok. And once again, thanks for the great lectures!

  • @nikhilwardrobe
    @nikhilwardrobe 9 років тому

    As A= 2cm × 2cm which is = 4 cm^2 and converting into meters area (4×10^-2)^2 then that would be = 0.0016; That would be the area right sir? and P:S 4×10^-2 for converting into meters and square for area

    • @MichelvanBiezen
      @MichelvanBiezen  9 років тому +1

      +nikhil monarch
      4 cm^2 = 0.0004 m^2 (move the decimal 4 spaces)

  • @Bobby14221234
    @Bobby14221234 6 років тому

    Why not use n/mm2 instead of n/m2 for easy to see a whole number instead of decimal or with exponential form..

    • @MichelvanBiezen
      @MichelvanBiezen  6 років тому +1

      Because Young's modulus is expressed in standard units.

  • @kdee61
    @kdee61 9 років тому

    please make more mechanics videos,very helpful thank you

  • @derimacion2558
    @derimacion2558 5 років тому +1

    Fantastic video!!!
    Thank you so much :)

  • @sizwembokazi8725
    @sizwembokazi8725 9 років тому

    Awesome example on a percentange change, but what i know is that a 1% percentage change of 1.75 is 0.0175 not 0.01 am i wrong ?, so i think the force required was going to be 84 000 000N,I think Sir just calculated a change of a strain as 0.01% if i'm wrong please explain.

    • @MichelvanBiezen
      @MichelvanBiezen  9 років тому +1

      sizwe mbokazi The equation and answer is correct on the video.
      1% = 0.01
      F required = 840,000N
      Take a close look at the equation and see what 0.01 represents in the equation.

    • @sizwembokazi8725
      @sizwembokazi8725 9 років тому

      Michel van Biezen I saw my confusion thaks!

  • @Sajal7861
    @Sajal7861 9 років тому +7

    Thanks for the video, the last calculation involved working out force so unit should have been Newtons not pascal.

  • @gotshinfinite7808
    @gotshinfinite7808 8 років тому +2

    thanks hehe your vids are really helpful! :)

  • @khamtanphonetip9019
    @khamtanphonetip9019 10 років тому

    Thanks a lot for your lecture which can help me a lot

  • @AJ_Clarke
    @AJ_Clarke 7 років тому +1

    Great Video!!

  • @joejoeOnlyOneJoe
    @joejoeOnlyOneJoe 9 років тому +4

    man , i love you ;D

  • @roicalonzo3889
    @roicalonzo3889 8 років тому +1

    Isnt it 20.83 mm?

    • @MichelvanBiezen
      @MichelvanBiezen  8 років тому

      It depends on how many significant figures you have. If they are not specified, we usually keep it at 3.

    • @roicalonzo3889
      @roicalonzo3889 8 років тому

      Michel van Biezen i mean your answer is 0.028 mm.isnt that equivalent to 2.08x10^-3?

    • @MichelvanBiezen
      @MichelvanBiezen  8 років тому

      2.083 x 10^-5 m = 0.02083 mm

  • @Ceepaige_
    @Ceepaige_ 8 років тому

    PLEASSSSSSSSSSSSEEEEE TEACH AT AUSTIN PEAY STATE UNIVERSITY........ cause you are my savior!!!!! I wouldn't be lost in class if you were my teacher hell. I may even like physics!!!!!

  • @tonyt50
    @tonyt50 9 років тому

    I don't understand squaring numbers when they are below 0.
    If you square 0.2m (20cm) it makes 0.04 (4cm) when really it would be 4 metres? Can you explain why you left the decimals as decimals and whether this creates inaccuracies

    • @MichelvanBiezen
      @MichelvanBiezen  9 років тому

      Scott Latter Scott,
      check your calculations, there are a few errors.
      (0.2m)^2 = 0.04m^2 (20cm)^2 = 400 cm^2 they are both the same

    • @tonyt50
      @tonyt50 9 років тому

      i don't mean to sound dumb but can you explain how they are the same please?

    • @tonyt50
      @tonyt50 9 років тому

      doesn't 400cm = 4m? not 0.04m?

    • @MichelvanBiezen
      @MichelvanBiezen  9 років тому

      Scott Latter cm^2 = cm x cm = cm squared
      there are 10,000 cm^2 in 1 m^2
      therefor 400 cm^2 = 0.04 m^2

    • @tonyt50
      @tonyt50 9 років тому

      thank you for clarifying, i appreciate it

  • @faizasikandar6050
    @faizasikandar6050 5 років тому

    Very good no words

  • @theobernier5474
    @theobernier5474 9 років тому

    For the second F you computed you wrote Pa as its unit instead of Newton. Apart from that, very good video

  • @TheKambaja
    @TheKambaja 8 років тому

    keep the good work

  • @osama1999
    @osama1999 8 років тому

    the young modulus is wrong for Al, Brass and Glass!! it must be divided on 10

    • @MichelvanBiezen
      @MichelvanBiezen  8 років тому +1

      There are decimal points there, thus the numbers as written are correct. The dots are small and cannot be seen clearly. Thanks for checking.

  • @thetownenders7930
    @thetownenders7930 5 років тому

    Explained so well here

  • @masausophiri5650
    @masausophiri5650 2 роки тому +1

    VOW EXPLAINATION CONTINUE

  • @saraths7053
    @saraths7053 6 років тому +1

    Tq sir

  • @rukhsanafaiz8871
    @rukhsanafaiz8871 8 років тому +2

    oh wow no dislikes

    • @amdinuredini287
      @amdinuredini287 7 років тому +2

      rukhsana faiz there are no dislikes because here come only people who like to learn